atomic, molecular and optical data requirements for plasma processing 20 th escampig, novi sad, july...
Post on 20-Jan-2016
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Atomic, Molecular and Optical Data requirements for plasma processing
20th ESCAMPIG, Novi Sad,
July 13 – 17, 2010
Nigel MasonThe Open University
UK
Workshop on data needs for plasma physics
• Session to discuss fundamental processes and applications in plasma processing
• This talk will review our knowledge of the fundamental processes
• Discuss what we know and what we don’t know. • and comment on the critical need for
DATA BASES
ESCAMPIG 2010
• At this meeting a wide range of plasmas will be discussed.
Technological plasmas in semiconductor industry, CVD, magetrons and pollution abatement
Related to Nanotechnology
Biophysics and medical applications
Plasmas cover a wide range
• Divide into three categories;
• Low pressure • Atmospheric
plasma• Fusion plasma
However, in order to understand all of these, we require knowledge of the fundamental processes – physical and chemical !
So how do we collect such data ?
So how do we collect such data ?
Look at the plasma !
So how do we collect such data ?
Look at the plasma !
Optical spectroscopy
(and IR and UV !)
So how do we collect such data ?
Optical Spectroscopy Identify chemical species;May gain knowledge ofGas Temperature;Electron Temperature E fields (U Czarnetski and S Hamaguchi CARS
for atmospheric pressure plasmas)
Optical Spectroscopy What data do we need ?
Absorption spectra
Emission spectra
Einstein coefficients
but also …
OpticalSpectroscopy What data do we need ?
• Branching ratios (cascade)
• Stark & Doppler broadening
• Temperature dependence
• Quenching rates
Optical Spectroscopy What data do we need ?
• And what we cant measure
(easily)
• Dark states (forbidden transitions)
• Short lived radicals
• Dust
• Anions
So how do we collect such data ?
Charged species
• Electrons
• Ions
Electrons
Measure electron flux and temperature
• Langmuir probe
• Thompson Scattering
• Some problems in reactive/corrosive gases
• And limited temporal resolution
Ions
Measure ion flux and composition
• Measure ion mobility – not distinct
• Mass spectrometry – hard to do in situ. fragmentation patterns, kinetic energy effects (radicals ?)
Dynamics and Chemistry
• Need to build models/simulations to test observations
Dynamics and Chemistry
• Need to build models/simulations to test observations
• Only as good as data you put into them
(even if you know the physical parameters)
Ideal is to have the ‘Virtual factory’
Plasma modelling and database assessment
Plasma modelling and database assessment
Plasma modelling and database assessment
• What data is needed ?
Plasma modelling and database assessment
• What data is needed ?
Electron impact processes• Energy resolved cross sections• Average temperature dependent rate coeffs• Dissociation/ionisation processes (including DEA, DR)
• Collisions with fragments (eg CF3 and CF2 )
• Emission cross sections for diagnostics• SURFACE REACTIONS
Plasma modelling and database assessment
• So how good is the data base ?
So where are we now in electron studies ?
• Electron – atom scattering
• Really quite good now at least for light atoms
• Elastic, excitation (including resonances)
• Ionisation
Elastic Scattering - rare gases
0.1
1
10
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Present DataMimnagh et al.McEachran & Stauffer
DC
S (
10-1
6 cm
2 sr-1
)
Scattering Angle (degrees)
Kr10 eV
0.1
1
10
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Present
Srivastava et al.
McEachran & Stauffer WoA
McEachran & Stauffer WA
DC
S (
10-1
6 cm2 sr
-1)
Scattering Angle (degrees)
Kr20 eV
0.01
0.1
1
10
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Present
Srivastava et al.
McEachran & Stauffer WoA
McEachran & Stauffer WA
DC
S (
10-1
6 cm2 sr
-1)
Scattering Angle (degrees)
Kr30 eV
Cho, McEachran, Tanaka, BuckmanJPB 37 4639 (2004)
So where are we now in electron studies ?
• Electron –molecule interactions
• Very poor c.f. atoms
• Difficulty is complexity of target
• New processes – dissociation – drives chemistry
So where are we now in electron studies ?
Electron –molecule interactions
Total cross sections;
Accurate to some 5%
(allow for forward scattering)
Lowest energies few meV !
Total cross sections for electron scattering
1 10 1000
20
40
60
80
100
CH3I 1.62 D CH3Br 1.81 D CH3Cl 1.87 D CH3F 1.85 D
To
tal c
ross
se
ctio
n (
10-2
0 m2 )
Electron energy (eV)Szmytkowski and collaboratorsSzmytkowski and collaborators
)exp(0 nlII
So where are we now in electron studies ?
Electron –molecule interactions
Elastic cross sections;
Accurate to some 10% - good standardsAngular range – can now measure 0 to 180
So momentum transfer cross section data are improving
Elastic scattering - H2O
1
10
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Present
Rescigno & Lengsfield (1992)
Okamoto et al (1993)
Gianturco et al (1998)
Varella et al (1999)
DC
S (
10-1
6 cm
2 sr-1
)
Scattering Angle (degrees)
10 eVElastic
0.1
1
10
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Present (CNU)Johnstone & NewellRescigno & LengsfieldOkamoto et alGianturco et alVarella et al
DC
S (
10-1
6 cm
2 sr-1
)
Scattering Angle (degrees)
6 eVElastic
0.1
1
10
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Present
Shyn & Cho
Varella et al.
Dif
fere
nti
al C
ross
Sec
tion
(10
-16 c
m2 s
r-1)
Scattering Angle (degrees)
4 eVElastic
Cho, Park, Tanaka, BuckmanJPB 37 625 (2004)
So where are we now in electron studies ?
Electron –molecule interactions
Inelastic cross sections;
Vibrational (but resolution and deconvolution)
Excitation – very poor despite importance
Transmission effects
Rotational excitation…
Vibrational excitationEnergy loss spectra
-0,2 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,60
3
6
9
12
15
18CH
2stretch
CH2 bend
CH2 twist + wag
CH2 rock
C-C stretch
THF
10eV, 110o
x50x15
x5Cou
nts
(*10
3 )
Energy loss (eV)
Vibrational excitation - HCOOH
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
C - O Stretch
Sca
tter
ed s
ign
al
(arb
.un
its)
Incident energy (eV)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
C = O Stretch
Sca
tter
ed s
ign
al
(arb
.un
its)
Incident energy (eV)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
C - H Stretch
Sca
tter
ed s
ign
al
(arb
.un
its)
Incident energy (eV)
0
5
10
15
20
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
O - H Stretch
Sca
tter
ed s
ign
al
(arb
.un
its)
Incident energy (eV)
So where are we now in electron studies ?
Electron –molecule interactions
Ionisation;
Better data sets
(cf Theory – Kim (BE) and Deutsch Maerk )
But Kinetic effects in products
Dissociative Electron Attachment (DEA)
Production of Negative Ions in Plasmas
ABC +
e-ABC # -
A(*) - + BC
A (*) - + B + C
Resonance ~ 10 -14 s
So where are we now in electron studies ?
Negative ions in plasmas
•Many commercial plasma/etchant gases are electronegative
•E.g. The fluorocarbons, chlorine and oxygen (H2 in fusion plasmas)
• Negative ions may be major negative charge carrier (> ‘free‘ electron flux) e.g. in CF4 and oxygen plasmas 10x electron
So where are we now in electron studies ?
Dissociative Electron Attachment –
Question as to how establish cross section
Few/no standards
Kinetic effects in products
Zero energy peaks !
So where are we now in electron studies ?
Electron –molecule interactions
Dissociation to neutrals particularly radicals
Ground state products – in its infancy
Still testing methodologies
No standard
Kinetic effects in products
So where are we now in electron studies ?
Electron –molecule interactions
Dissociation to excited states
Fluorescence– lots of data but
Detector calibrations
Role of cascade
Kinetic energy – Doppler broadening
Summary electron molecule database
• Lots of data • But few complete and self consistent datasets
(N2 best --- Loureiro)• Need to bring database together and cross
reference. • Combine expt with theory on-line calcns
(Quantemol J Tennyson)• Emol database under development
What about other processes ?
• Ion molecule and
• Neutral reactive chemistry
• Similar problems
• Reported rate coefficients may differ by orders of magnitude, depends on temperature, pressure (three body effects)
What about clusters ?
• Important in atmospheric pressure plasmas
• Particularly the role of water/humidity !
• Indeed key role in atmospheric discharges
• (Kushner Bubbles and biological systems)
21.04.23
Mass analysis of ions in atmospheric plasma (Hiden)
Mass analysis of ions in atmospheric plasma --- coronal discharge in air All are clusters no monomers
Mass analysis of ions in atmospheric plasma --- coronal discharge in air All are clusters no monomers
Mass analysis of ions in atmospheric plasma --- coronal discharge in air All are clusters no monomers
So cluster chemistry dominates !And key role of water !!!
Anions made by dissociative electron attachment to molecular oxygen
O- in region near wire (glow region)and O2
- in drift region
So cluster chemistry dominates !And key role of water !!!
Clusters formed
Anions cluster to water molecules easily
What about surfaces ?
• Introduce role of heterogeneous chemistry
Characterisation of surface processing
Effects of Plasma Processing Parameters on the Surface
Reactivity of OH(X2Π) in Tetraethoxysilane/O2 Plasmas
during Deposition of SiO2
K. H. A. Bogart, J. P. Cushing and R. Fisher
Surface Processes • Surfaces exposed to plasmas experience bombardment by energetic ions,electrons, neutrals, and photons.
• The detail in which we understand the effects of such bombardment varies widely depending on the particular process.
• The goal of fundamental surface studies, both theoretical and experimental, should be to provide insight and data for process simulation and/or reactor design.
• Examples of the data needed are cross sections and rate constants for energytransfer, reaction, emission, surface diffusion, implantation, reflection,disordering, and recombination. All these processes affect material properties, andall are affected by exposure to the non equilibrium, low-energy plasma.
• http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=1875&page=R11
Open Questions
Surface studies
• How to define a cross section on a surface
• Role of molecular orientation
• Role of morphology
• Shift in energy levels and electronic states !
Water ice Note : Blue shift in the solid phase
0.0E+00
2.0E-18
4.0E-18
6.0E-18
8.0E-18
1.0E-17
1.2E-17
1.4E-17
1.6E-17
1.8E-17
2.0E-17
6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5
Photon Energy / eV
Cro
ss S
ectio
n
/ cm2
Comparison of gas and solid phase Methylamine
Note absence of low lying bands in solid phase
Energy (eV)
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Cro
ss S
ectio
n (
cm
2 )
0
1e-18
2e-18
3e-18
4e-18
5e-18
6e-18
7e-18
Gas PhaseSolid Phase
Sputtering
• For physical sputtering and energy transfer, the most important properties of the projectile and target are their masses and their interaction potentials.
• This relative simplicity combined with a wealth of experimental data on sputtering has facilitated the development of sophisticated theories and simulation tools.
Etching feature characterisation
• An understanding of the transfer of energy between surface and ion and the modification of the sidewall surface is needed to model the feature profile and to predict the dependence of etch and deposition rates on microstructure.
• Little is known about the surface chemistry and physics at atmospheric pressure and high temperature (greater than 800°C), which are typical conditions for rapid deposition of diamond and superconducting films.
Beam Surface Experiments • Much of our fundamental
understanding of surface processes occurring during etching and deposition comes from well-controlled plasma simulation experiments in which beams of ions, electrons, neutrals, and photons are directed either at well- characterized surfaces.
• The beams are typically analyzed using mass spectrometry. The surface chemistry is usually diagnosed using XPS, AES etc
Published in: K. H. A. Bogart; J. P. Cushing; Ellen R. Fisher; J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 10016-10023.DOI: 10.1021/jp971596oCopyright © 1997 American Chemical Society
Synergy of ion and neutral chemistry
• Experiments have clearly demonstrated synergy between ion bombardment and neutral chemistry in plasma etching
• The etching rate with combination of ion and reactive neutrals exceeds the sum of the individual etch rates for ion sputtering and neutral reaction.
Extending surface studies
• Beam-surface studies have been focused largely on etching reactions,
• But there is perhaps an even greater need for experimental simulation of plasma deposition processes.
• E.g. diamond and diamond-like film deposition from methane and other hydrocarbon plasmas. With appropriate free radical and ion beams, sticking probabilities are key data
What about sticking coefficients ?
Method to Determine the Sticking Coefficient of O2 of Deposited AlDuring Reactive Magnetron Sputtering, Using Mass SpectrometryW P. Leroy, S Mahieu, R Persoons, D Depla (2009)Plasma Processes and Polymers 0.1002/ppap.200932401
Coefficient of 0.107 ± 0.032 for O2 on depositedaluminium during reactive magnetron sputtering.
Mass spectrometry used to measure local, effective O2 partial pressure during sputtering, combined with electron probe microanalysis of theoxygen content in deposited layers, we calculate the sticking coefficient.
• Chemical surface transformations using electron induced reactions/
• DEA produces products that subsequently react on the surface
• E.g. Irradiate film of NF3 and CH3Cl
• Form CH3F
Electron Induced surface chemistry
e-
F-
CH3Cl CH3F
Cl-
Basice--moleculeinteractions
Resonances
E0 dependence
Control via e--induced chemistry developing electron lithography
e--induced chemistry
Cross sections
Typical reactions and products
Reaction sequences
Surface functionalization
Reactionsat the interface
of materials
Modification of materials properties
- structural- electrical- permeability- optical
Anions and dust/aerosol formation ? • Anions are known to be precursors
of dust formation in plasmas (eg fluorocarbon plasmas etching Silicon wafers) or in silane plasmas
• but we know little on heterogeneous chemistry on dust
• Key to Titan aerosol chemistry ?
So how to assemble necessary databases ?
• Vital but
• How is it assembled and updated ?
• How is data selected ?
• Who pays ?
• One data base or several ?
Any database must fulfill several basic pre-requisites.
• It should be comprehensive with a full listing of experimental and, where applicable, theoretical results.
• Often it is assumed that the most recent results are the most accurate – this is often not the case since often both experimentalists and theoreticians publish ‘calibration data’ when designing new apparatus/codes.
• This data is used to illustrate the general operational performance of their system prior to conducting research on new systems. Such ‘calibration data’ is seldom of the same rigorous quality as the original data against which it is compared Replacing such ‘calibration data’ in a data base for older data is therefore often a mistake and is not the intention of the authors.
Any database must fulfill several basic pre-requisites.
• Any database that aims to be adopted by an applied community should include a list of recommended values.
• These may be subject to compilers’ bias (often the choice of which data set to adopt is a question of ‘gut feeling’ based on the experience and personal knowledge of the authors providing the data).
• Therefore it is necessary to have some method by which databases may be compared with one another.
Summary of database needs
• Develop database that community has ownership of
• Access is easy for posting data
• Discussion is easy !
• Provides up to date summary of data and recommendations
VAMDC is funded under the “Combination of Collaborative
Projects and Coordination and Support Actions” Funding
Scheme of The Seventh Framework Program.
Call topic: INFRA-2008-1.2.2 Scientific Data Infrastructure.
Grant Agreement number: 239108.
• VAMDC will provide a scientific data
e-infrastructure enabling easy access to A+M resources
• Http://www.vamdc.org/
Virtual Atomic and Molecular Data Centre (VAMDC) aims to build a secure, documented, flexible and interoperable e-science environment-based interface to the existing AM data.
The VAMDC will be built upon the expertise of existing AM databases, data producers and service providers with the specific aim of creating an infrastructure that is easily tuned to the requirements of a wide variety of users
The project will cover the building of the core consortium, the development and deployment of the infrastructure and the development of interfaces to the existing AM databases as well as providing a forum for training potential users
VAMDC does not collect or commission data but…
Will be a ‘one stop shop’ access to databases (currently some 17 are planned)
Wants to know what data is needed and the format it is most usefully presented in ; hence supports these meetings and discussions
WHAT DO YOU NEED ? Survey will follow this meeting !
Brussels -Negociation - S1 - 23/01/2009VAMDC - Brussels - Nov 08
Brussels -Negociation - S1 - 23/01/2009
Main Objectives• Atomic & Molecular data underpins a wide range of
basic and applied research and industrial development• VAMDC will provide the extensible scientific data
infrastructure enabling cost effective, European wide access to the increasingly large, distributed and complex A+M resources
• VAMDC will provide flexible interfaces to A+M resources supporting improved producer/consumer linkages
• Existing European wide grid (EGEE), network (GEANT) and application (Euro-VO) infrastructures form the effective baseline platform to create the VAMDC infrastructure
• VAMDC will extend these infrastructures to support common access to A+M data thus placing this primary data at the heart of the scientific progress
Brussels -Negociation - S1 - 23/01/2009
Main Objectives of the Proposal
We will deliver an electronic infrastructure which is general, flexible and useful for collecting and accessing A&M data. In order to demonstrate those properties we will:
• implement VAMDC interface for accessing major existing databases containing heterogeneous data and aimed at different users
• demonstrate data queries across multiple DBs that are focussed on specific research topic(s)
• demonstrate data publishing/quality control process for major A&M data producers
• involve wide user and producer communities in those test applications of VAMDC
Funding
3 million Euros for 42 months from July 1st 2009 to develop this data base
Meetings with major user communities will be held (including the plasma community)
Operational and sustainable by end of project
top related