braddock road (route 620) and pleasant valley road (route ... · final or estimated contract value...
Post on 29-Sep-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection ImprovementA Design-Build ProjectFairfax County, Virginia
From: 0.168 miles west of Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)To: 0.076 miles east of Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)
Proposal SubmittalLetter of Submittal and Attachments
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501Federal Project No.: STP-5A01 (382)
Contract ID Number: C00103318DB71
Proposal Submitted By:
& April 24, 2014
Section 4.1Letter of Submittal
Section 4.2Attachments to Letter of Submittal
Section 4.2.1Affiliated/Subsidiary Companies List
Section 4.2.2Certification Regarding Debarment Forms
Attachment 4.2.2 (a)Attachment 4.2.2 (b)
Section 4.2.3VDOT Prequalification Certificate
Section 4.2.4Surety Letter
Section 4.2.5License & Registration Information
Section 4.2.6Work History Forms
Attachment 4.2.6 (a)Attachment 4.2.6 (b)
ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)
LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design
consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.
c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.
d. Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)
Original Contract Value
Final or Estimated Contract Value
Name: Intercounty Connector Contract A Location: Montgomery County, MD
Name: Parsons Transportation Group
Name of Client./ Owner: Maryland SHA Phone: 410.677.4000 Project Manager: Melinda Peters Phone: 410-545-0400 Email: mpeters@sha.md.us
8/2010 12/2010 $464,000 464,000 $102,107
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly. Contract A of the Intercounty Connector was a large design-build project in Montgomery County Maryland. ($464 million dollar design-build best value). Wagman was an equity member of a fully integrated construction joint venture, so we were joint and severable with each partner and financially responsible for the project. The project was 8.5 miles long with 18 structures, 350,000 sf of noise walls, utility relocations, ROW acquisition, environmental permitting and monitoring, drainage, over 3 million cubic yard of excavation, and construction of 4 interchanges. On the western end of the project we had 1.5 miles of existing I-370 to widen and reconstruct. I-370 was widened to the median to create an additional lane and 8 existing structures were widened to the median. After the bridges were widened we placed a latex concrete overlay. Wagman performed this work, since we are the largest latex modified concrete supplier in the mid-Atlantic region. The interface of I-370 and the new ICC required us to widen to the median and to the outside and reconstruct 4 additional structures to accommodate new ramps for the new interchange. Major traffic control and traffic switches were required on the western end to minimize impacts to the travelling public. The project included extensive ITS and signalization within the project limits and beyond the project limits to inform the motorists and maintain traffic flow. Many innovative ideas were utilized to reduce cost and minimize impacts to the environment, such as open-bottom culverts, underground storm-water management structures to reduce thermal impact to adjacent streams, redesign of the interchange with existing I-370 and the MAR access road to eliminate structures and reduce the quantity of retaining walls. KCI was involved in structure design, roadway design and environmental clearance. As a Joint Venture Partner, Wagman was responsible for the design and construction of the entire project. We utilized the ATC Process to redesign a three level interchange into a 2 level trumpet interchange reducing bid cost, but also reducing long term maintenance costs for the owner. A Complete Traffic Management Plan was developed for the project that included all phases of construction and project completion. Context Sensitive Design was incorporated to ensure compliance with the aesthetic requirements and the projects commitment check list. Wagman personnel held key positions such as General Roadway Superintendent, General Structure’s superintendent, Pile Driving Manager, Design Coordination Assistant Manager, E&S Superintendent, and various construction field engineers and field employees. The project utilized three dimensional modeling to assist with survey and earth moving operations. We were able to adjust the vertical and horizontal alignment to eliminate excess excavated material Verifiable Evidence of Performance
2012 National Design-Build Award 2012 Exemplary Ecosystem Initiatives Award 2012 America’s Transportation Awards Top 10 Finalist 2012 ARTBA Globe Award for Environmental Excellence 2011 Northeast’s Region Best Overall Project 2011 President’s Award for highways
Lessons Learned Environmental Compliance Maintenance & Protection of Traffic
Similar Scope Elements to Braddock Road project Environmental Compliance X Geotechnical Challenges X Work within environmentally sensitive areas X Maintenance of Traffic X
Design-Build X Major Existing Utilities X Earthwork, Drainage & Paving X
ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)
LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design
consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.
c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.
d. Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)
Original Contract Value
Final or Estimated Contract Value
Name: Salisbury Bypass Phase II – Wicomico River Bridge Location: Salisbury MD
Name: Whitney Baily Cox and Magnami
Name of Client./ Owner: Maryland SHA Phone: 410.677.4000 Project Manager: Donnie Drewer Phone: 410.677.4006 Email: ddrewer@sha.md.us
10/14/02 10/14/02 $6,681 $6,665 $6,665
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly. Wagman constructed the bridge structures on the Salisbury Bypass Phase 2. The main structure was s dual bridge across the Wicomico river in Salisbury MD. Due to environmental impacts the new bridges were to be constructed from a trestle bridge. All pile driving, substructure concrete, beam erection and deck placement was completed from the temporary bridge. Wagman was responsible for the design and construction of the temporary structure. During planning for bridge construction we identified that the original design created a large environmental impact to the wetlands and Wicomico floodplain. Through a partnership with Maryland SHA and the local district we proposed the re-design the bridge structure to lengthen the bridge and get the bridge abutments outside of the floodplains. Maryland SHA responded favorably to our proposition and we worked together to re-design the bridge and eliminate or minimize impacts to the flood plain and wetlands. The Army Corps of Engineers awarded the project an environmental award for the effort. This project also received the Maryland Quality Initiative award for best Large Project. The Wicomico River is a slow moving with a deep channel but wide floodplains, because the river overflows its banks with any major storm event.
Lessons Learned Driving 24-inch pile Environmental permit modifications to minimize impacts Limited access for construction High water fluctuation due to storm events
Similar Scope Elements to Braddock Road project Environmental Compliance X Geotechnical Challenges X Work within environmentally sensitive areas X
DB Coordination on bridge re-design X Permit modification to minimize environmental impacts
X
ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)
LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design
consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.
c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.
d. Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)
Original Contract Value
Final or Estimated Contract Value
Name: Route 604 Improvements Location: Chesterfield County, VA
Name: Virginia DOT
Name of Client./ Owner: Virginia DOT Phone: 800-367-7623 Project Manager: Chris Winstead, P.E. Phone: 804-674-2800 Email: christopher.winstead@vdot
Nov. 2003 Nov. 2003 8,100 8,100 8,100
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly. The route 604 Improvement Project was awarded to Key Construction Co., Inc. (Acquired by G.A. & F.C. Wagman, Inc.) by VDOT. The Contractor’s responsibilities included grading, drainage, curb and gutter, utilities, paving, guardrail, striping, signals, landscaping and a new bridge across Route 288. Included within the project was the reconstruction of two major signalized intersections with extended connection construction. These reconstructed intersections included the intersection of Genito/Warbro Road and Genito/Old Hundred Road. D.W. Lyle Corporation was subcontracted to provide bridge construction and worked diligently to successfully meet the schedule for the project. In addition to high volume traffic, complicating factors encountered during construction included numerous utility conflicts and a temporary project shutdown due to a VDOT funding crises. Despite these factors, the project was finished ahead of schedule and earned an early completion incentive bonus. Both Key Construction Co., Inc. and D.W. Lyle Corporation were acquired by G.A. & F.C. Wagman, Inc. in 2013. The acquisitions were part of a strategic venture to supplement our construction abilities in Virginia and other Southern States. G.A. & F.C. Wagman have retained the key personnel from these acquisitions and utilize their experience to strengthen G.A. & F.C. Wagman’s overall capabilities. G.A. & F.C. Wagman is justified in utilizing a Key Construction Co. past project to satisfy the relevant project experience on this project due to the retention of the acquired firms’ personnel and resources. The past experience of the acquired firms with VDOT combined with G.A. & F.C. Wagman’s past experience with VDOT along with the combined resources will promote a successful completion of this project. Before Construction After Construction
Similar Scope Elements to Braddock Road project Utility Relocations X Geotechnical Challenges X High Traffic Volume X Earthwork X Asphalt Paving X Intersection Work & Related MOT X Curbs/Concrete Flatwork X
ATTACHMENT 3.4.1(b) LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Narrative describing nature of Firm’s Responsibilities
c. Client/Owner/Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities. Include address and current phone number
d. Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in Thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. (in thousands)
Contract Value (Original)
Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)
Mowatt Lane Roundabout College Park, Maryland
Design of Roadway Improvements and Roundabout
Owner: University of Maryland, College Park 1301 Service Building College Park, MD 20742 Bill Olen: (301) 405-7336
Contractor: OPUS East, LLC 2099 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 David Coleman: (973) 753-3500 (now with Skanska USA)
2004 2004 $2,200 $2,180 $175
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant.
AMT provided comprehensive planning and design for the widening and construction of Mowatt Lane from Campus Drive to Knox Road, including the construction of an intersection roundabout located on the campus of the University of Maryland, College Park. Services provided include background and data collection, engineering alignment development, client coordination, surveying, preliminary and final design, storm drain design, utility relocation coordination, permitting, landscaping, lighting, Maintenance of Traffic (MOT), signing and striping, and erosion and sediment (E/S) control. Specific project components included:
Alignment Development – Developed roadway options including horizontal alignment, vertical alignment to minimize pavement excavation, and typical section segments including landscape strip, lane widths, and closed section. AMT minimized impacts to the natural environment and surrounding buildings by developing an alignment that would fit within an existing right of way and coordinated with the University of Maryland and City of College Park to design an alignment to meet their desired needs and Master Plan.
Roundabout Design – A traffic analysis was conducted to determine the appropriate traffic control, and a roundabout design was recommended and constructed. Design of the roundabout followed the FHWA Roundabouts Informational Guide for a single lane roundabout and adhered to AASHTO and SHA design criteria.
Drainage Design and Stormwater Management – Prepared drainage area map; determined adequacy of existing facilities, location/size of proposed inlets and culverts for a closed system; and designed required outfall protection. Met significant SWM quantity and quality control requirements through bioretention and CPV design.
Lighting – Aesthetically pleasing lighting was provided to accommodate vehicular/pedestrian traffic.
Maintenance of Traffic – Extensive MOT and phasing was required to accommodate pedestrian safety, and maintain a minimum one lane of traffic in each direction.
Utility Relocations – Required relocation of utility poles through PEPCO. Early coordination was provided with the utility company to provide time in the schedule for the design of the relocation and the construction.
Signing and Striping – Signing was critical to ensure pedestrian safety. Pavement markings at the pedestrian crosswalks were developed to provide high visibility for student crossings.
Surveying – Conducted in-house topographic survey to establish base mapping for subsequent design. Recovered buried utility data identified by Miss Utility and identified all topographic elements. Conducted property research to identify ROW lines.
Permitting – Expedited permitting was utilized for MDE/USACE joint permitting for wetlands adjacent to the project. E/S control approval was coordinated through Prince George’s County. Prepared Forest Conservation Plan, coordinating with MDNR until the permit was granted..
Project Features
Roundabout design and associated traffic analyses
3,000 feet of roadway improvements
Extensive utility relocations
Lead Contractor: OPUS East, LLC
Scope and Complexity Similarities
Roundabout design and roadway improvements
Combination of state and federal funding
High sensitivity to maintenance of traffic and safety during construction
Evidence of Good Performance The project was completed on time, within budget, safely and without any unusual traffic situations.
Challenges & Solutions
Providing adequate pedestrian access with limited right-of-way and off-roadway obstructions –narrow road through lanes to accommodate adequate sidewalk width
Providing adequate geometrics for roundabout with limited right of way – AMT used the design standards for an urban single lane roundabout that uses a 120 ft diameter inscribed circle to have the appropriate turning radius and safety features.
Maintain traffic during construction – AMT prepared MOT plans that used 4 phases of construction to allow for 2 directions of travel at all times through the intersection in order to construct the roundabout and not create traffic delays. Provided for construction time frames that would limit traffic during peak periods.
ATTACHMENT 3.4.1(b) LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Narrative describing nature of Firm’s Responsibilities
c. Client/Owner/Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities. Include address and current phone number
d. Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in Thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. (in thousands)
Contract Value (Original)
Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)
Route 7 Improvements Loudoun County, Virginia
Design of Roadway & Intersection Improvements and Safety Measures
Owner: Loudoun County / VDOT 1 Harrison Street, SE Leesburg, Virginia 20177 Ron Mallory: (703) 737-8398 James Zeller, PE: (703) 737-2014
Contractor: General Excavation, Inc. 9757 Rider Road Warrenton, VA 20187 Dwayne Miller: (540) 439-2202
2013 2013 $3,700 $3,700 $510
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant.
AMT provided transportation design, traffic engineering, surveying and construction phase services for the Route 7 Improvements project involving roadway widening and improvements to six intersections. More specifically, AMT provided the following services:
Geometrics – Widening of the existing facilities to include the expansion and addition of both right and left turn lanes as well as expanding intersections to allow for multi left turn lanes at several intersections. Work includes modifying median noses for turning radii.
Drainage – Modifications to accommodate the widened roadway involved ditch, inlet, storm drain, and culvert design as well as watershed modeling. Designed bioretention basins to manage the increases in runoff for stormwater management. Prepared E&S Control plans.
Landscaping – Prepared landscaping plans for community gateways as well as the proposed bioretention basins.
Traffic Data Collection – Collected traffic data including peak-hour turning movement counts at all major intersections along the Route 7 corridor during the AM, mid-day, and PM peak-hours. Field observations included the identification of peak hour queues and bottlenecks, their location, and approximate reason for their occurrence.
Traffic Analysis – Studied existing and future traffic conditions based on existing signal timing/phasing to identify operational deficiencies. Synchro/SimTraffic modeling simulations were developed for existing and future conditions to determine the levels of services, delays, travel times, and queues at each signalized intersection.
Signal Design and Optimization – New traffic signal poles and related infrastructure were designed where widening impacted the existing poles. Other signals were modified to accommodate the new turn lane configurations. The existing signal-system was optimized and re-timed as necessary to obtain the most efficient cycle lengths during the AM, mid-day, and PM peak periods, as well as examine the splits, phasing, offsets, and clearance intervals throughout the coordinated corridor based on ITE guidelines.
Traffic Control Plans – Prepared traffic control plans in accordance with VDOT and MUTCD requirements including phased sequence, barrier service, temporary signs and drums.
Survey, Utility Designation, and ROW – Providing topographic survey, utility designation and test pits for improvement areas throughout the corridor. Also preparing ROW plats.
Project Features
Traffic analysis and improvement design for six intersections
1.1 miles of roadway and safety improvements
Lead Contractor: General Excavation, Inc.
Scope and Complexity Similarities
Intersection analyses and design improvements
Similarly sized project - $3.7 million
VDOT standards and approval
Sensitivity to maintenance of traffic and safety during construction
Evidence of Good Performance The project was completed on time, within budget, safely and without any unusual traffic situations.
Challenges & Solutions
Providing additional lanes with limited right-of-way and off-roadway obstructions – AMT proposed widening into the existing bifurcated median and shifting through traffic into the newly developed median lanes to provide the required right turn lane additions.
Providing stormwater management for all proposed improvements without acquiring right-of-way – AMT provided the design for a series of low-impact design bio-filtration basins in the median. The grades of the bifurcated median limited available space for the proposed basins requiring a more complex series of basins that were smaller in size. Basins were then integrated into the median landscaping for more aesthetic appeal.
Avoiding utility conflicts in the median – AMT took a non-standard approach to the typical shoulder design and proposed a closed drainage system where needed, pulling culverts and ditch lines away from the center of the median where the existing utilities were concentrated.
ATTACHMENT 3.4.1(b) LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM
(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)
a. Project Name & Location b. Narrative describing nature of Firm’s Responsibilities
c. Client/Owner/Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities. Include address and current phone number
d. Contract Completion Date (Original)
e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)
f. Contract Value (in Thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. (in thousands)
Contract Value (Original)
Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)
Route 80 Buchanan and Dickenson Counties, Virginia
Roadway Design and Traffic Engineering
Owner: Virginia Department of Transportation 870 Bonham Road Bristol, VA 24201 Amanda Cox, PMP: (276) 669-6151
Contractor: Bizzack Construction, LLC 2257 Executive Drive Lexington, KY 40505 Stewart Gaither, PE: (859) 299-8001
2013 2013 $4,200 $4,200 $620
h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant.
AMT provided all highway design, hydraulic design, utility relocation plans, right-of-way plans, stormwater management plans, transportation management plan (TMP), and erosion and sedimentation control plans for a two lane collector roadway as well as the associated connections and improvements to three local roadways. Included within the scope of the project is 0.56 miles of roadway tying into existing Route 80, relocation of existing Route 693, relocation of existing Route 768, relocation of existing Route 609, a new connection of proposed Route 768 with proposed Route 609, and a 300 foot long bulb-T girder bridge crossing Hunt’s Creek and Route 768.
The stormwater management for the project is being controlled primarily through the implementation of one primary basin controlling the majority of the project runoff. The erosion and siltation control is being handled by smaller basins throughout the project site as well as sediment traps and other control measures.
A major challenge with the project was the development of a functional maintenance of traffic plan as a subset of the overall Transportation Management Plan. The relocation of Route 693, Route 768, and Route 609 in conjunction with the construction of a new bridge including overhead work above Route 768 presented numerous challenges with regard to maintenance of traffic. The tie-ins to the existing routes required the development of two and three phase plans in order to route the traffic through and around the work zone. In one case, a temporary detour road was designed within the project environmental footprint to bypass traffic around the work zone.
AMT was also responsible for developing the project QA/QC Plan, including both the design and construction portions of the document. AMT has provided detailed design schedule information for inclusion into the Baseline Schedule and is participating in regular project meetings with VDOT officials. AMT provided construction inspection services and project documentation.
Project Features
Roadway design
Hydraulics and stormwater management plans
Maintenance of Traffic
Lead Contractor: Bizzack Construction, LLC
Scope and Complexity Similarities
Roadway design
VDOT project
Similarly sized project - $4.2 million
Combination of state and federal funding
High sensitivity to maintenance of traffic and safety during construction
Evidence of Good Performance The project was completed on time, within budget, safely and without any unusual traffic situations.
Challenges & Solutions
Development of a functional maintenance of traffic plan – AMT developed a temporary detour road, designed within the project environmental footprint, to bypass traffic around the work zone.
Utility accommodations – AMT minimized utility conflicts by adjusting geometrics and working closely with the utility companies to partner in the accommodations.
Environmental impact optimization – AMT adjusted geometric features to minimize impacts to environmental features and optimize permit issuance.
Section 4.2.7Conceptual Roadway Plans
NOTES
CP-
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
LEGEND
Mill & Overlay Pavment
Proposed Drainage Features
Proposed Lighting
Full Depth Pavement
SCALE
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
6. St’d. CG-12 Type A Req’d.
Mod. CG-3 Curb Req’d. (See Detail Sheet 1B)5.
St’d. CG-2 Curb Req’d.4.
St’d. CG-6 Curb & Gutter Req’d.3.
St’d. MS-1A Median Req’d.2.
St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d.1.
12. St’d. CG-12 Type M Req’d.
Prop. 8’ Asphalt/Stone Multi-Use Path Req’d.11.
10. Prop. Concrete Truck Apron
9. Prop. 8’ Paved Shoulder
8. St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement Conc. Sidewalk Req’d.
7. St’d. CG-12 Type B Req’d.
WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED.
THIS PROJECT IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
AND BRIDGE STANDARDS, 2009 MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA SUPPLEMENT TO
AMENDED BY CONTRACT PROVISIONS AND THE COMPLETE ELECTRONIC
PDF VERSION OF THE PLAN ASSEMBLY.
THE MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL AND AS
DEPARTMENT’S 2007 ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS, 2008 ROAD
STATE
PROJECT
NO.
SECTIONEQUALITIES
FEET
LENGTH INCLUDINGFEDERAL AID
PROJECT NO.FEET FEETMILES MILES
LENGTH EXCLUDINGTYPE
PROJECTDESCRIPTIONBRIDGE(S) BRIDGE(S)TYPE
CODE
UPC
NO.
NONEPENG.
3 4
5B
5D
Project Lengths are based on Construction Baseline
ALL CURVES ARE TO BE SUPERELEVATED, TRANSITIONED AND
5
103318STP-5A01 (382)
0620-0
29-0
17
0 200’ 400’
SCALEDESCRIPTION REFERENCE
0.200
6
Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)
(US Route 50)
To Lee Jackson Memorial Hwy
(US Route 29)
To Lee Hwy(U
S
Route 15)
To Ja
mes
Monroe H
wy
Fairfax County Population 1,081,726 (2010 Census)
WIDENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD TC5.11 ULS, EXCEPT
STA. 100+50
.00Begin Pr
oject
STA. 113+39.3
6End Pro
ject
PRELIMINARY1056.361056.36 0.200
End ConstructionBegin Construction
STA. 205+14.78
Braddock Road (R
oute 620)
(US
Route 66)
To Curtis
Me
morial P
kwy
200
205
215
220
225
110
115
105
100
210
STP-5A01 (382) 103318 NONE 1056.36 0.200 1056.36 0.200 RIGHT OF WAYRW-201 ROWA
FROM: 0.168 MI. WEST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY RD)
TO: 0.076 MI. EAST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY RD)
TO: 0.076 MI. EAST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY RD)
FROM: 0.168 MI. WEST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY RD)
PR
OJE
CT: 0
620-0
29-0
17, P-10
1, RW-2
01
P-101
STA. 229+85.27
WAGMAN DESIGN-BUILD TEAM CONCEPT PLANS
1
ROUTE 609
INT. OF ROUTE 620 &
POI STA. 109+37.27 RTE. 609
TO: 0.076 MI. EAST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD)
FROM: 0.168 MI. WEST OF RTE. 609 (PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD)
ROUTE 620 (BRADDOCK ROAD)
FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA
TYPICAL SECTIONS
2%
Center Point of Island
BL
Point of Finished Grade
2:12%2% 2%
1’ MIN
2%
2:1
to to
to to
Varies 13’ - 49’ 2.5’Varies 13’ to 18’2.5’
ROUTE 609
Sta 221+67
Sta 222+67 Sta 226+00
Sta 108+04 Sta 108+87
Sta 109+87 Sta 112+00
ROUTE 620
BL
Point of Finished Grade
2:12%
1’ MIN
Varies 9’ - 19’ 2.5’ 10’2.5’10’
Match Exist. Slope
Varies 9’ to 24’
Varies Varies1’ MIN
2%Match Exist. Slope
to to
to to
ROUTE 609
Sta 102+07 Sta 108+04
Sta 112+00
ROUTE 620
Sta 226+00
2:1
St’d. UD-4 Underdrain
St’d. UD-4 UnderdrainSt’d. UD-4 Underdrain
with CG-2 Face
St’d. MS-1A Median
Curb & Gutter
St’d. CG-6
Curb & Gutter
St’d. CG-6
Curb & Gutter
St’d. CG-6
Curb & Gutter
St’d. CG-6
5%
10’
2’
8’ Paved Shoulder
Underdrain
St’d. UD-4
2:1
SHOULDER SECTION LEFT
6’
5%
10’
2’
8’ Paved Shoulder
Underdrain
St’d. UD-4
2:1
6’
ROUTE 609 ROUTE 620
to toSta 227+34 Sta 110+94 Sta 113+39Sta 224+89
SHOULDER SECTION RIGHT
ROUTE 609
to toSta 219+68 Sta 110+94Sta 217+23
ROUTE 620
Sta 113+39
2% 2%
2:1
2.5’ 10’
5’4’
St’d. UD-4 Underdrain
Curb & Gutter
St’d. CG-6
15’30’
1’
Apron
5’ Truck
St’d. UD-4 Underdrain
Conc. Sidewalk
St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement
Conc. Sidewalk
St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement
Conc. Sidewalk
St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement
2%
ROUNDABOUT TYPICAL
2%2%
2:1
2.5’10’
5’ 4’
St’d. UD-4 Underdrain
Curb & Gutter
St’d. CG-6
15’ 30’
1’
Apron
5’ Truck
St’d. UD-4 Underdrain
Conc. Sidewalk
St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement
100’
3% 3%
St’d. CG-2 Curb
St’d. CG-2 Curb
ROUNDABOUT APPROACH OVERLAY AND WIDENING
2:1
TYPICAL OUTFALL DITCH SECTION
2:1
(See Detail This Sheet)
Mod. CG-3 Curb(See Detail This Sheet)
Mod. CG-3 Curb
Underdrain
St’d. UD-4
1’ In Accordance with WP-2
Saw-Cut Exist. Pavement
Type I, No. 21B
Base Material,
4" AggregateType I, No. 21B
Base Material,
4" Aggregate
Sta 217+22.66
Sta 227+33.79 Sta 113+39.36
Sta 219+71.62
Sta 219+71.62
Type I, No. 21B
Base Material,
4" Aggregate
Type I, No. 21B
Base Material,
4" Aggregate
ROUNDABOUT APPROACH NEW PAVEMENT
10’
4’ 5’
2:12:1
10’ & Var.
16’ Clear Zone
10.5’ Lateral Offset
35 MPH
10.5’ Lateral Offset
35 MPH
10.5’ Lateral Offset
35 MPH
10.5’ Lateral Offset
35 MPH
35 MPH
16’ Clear Zone
35 MPH
10.5’ Lateral Offset
35 MPH
10.5’ Lateral Offset
35 MPH
Exist. Pavement 18’ - 22’
Roundabout To Be Landscaped
Inner Circle Of
Asphalt
Stone
8’
PATH CONNECTOR
ALTERNATE ASPHALT
Sta 221+50 Rt.
St’d. UD-4 Underdrain
2
St’d. EC-2 Lining Req’d.
V-Ditch Sta. 208+00 to Sta. 219+75
4’ Min. Depth
Str. 3-1 to Sta. 208+00
Flat Bottom Ditch Req’d.
Depth 2.5’ & Var.
2
1
3
4
5
PAVEMENT SECTION NOTES
Notes:
in splitter islands)(3) Minimum widths are 15’ (face of curb to face of curb
(4) Roundabout should accommodate through movement for a WB-62 vehicle
year as determined by VDOT(1) The design year for this project is viewed as an interim design
directions (N,E,S,W) away from the intersection(2) The minmum lane widths will tie into existing 9’ wide lanes in all
4:1 Min. 4:1 Min.
SURFACE - 1.5" ASPHALT CONCRETE, TYPE SM-9.5D @ 182 LBS/SQ YD
INTERMEDIATE - 2" ASPHALT CONCRETE, TYPE IM-19.0A @ 244 LBS/SQ YD
BASE - 6" ASPHALT CONCRETE, TYPE BM-25.0A
beneath the paved shoulder.
connected to a standard UD-4 edgedrain beneath the curb and gutter or SUBBASE NO. 1 - 6" AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL, TYPE I SIZE NO. 21B,
the edge of pavement
pugmill mixed with a 4% hydrualic cement by weight extended 12" beyond SUBBASE NO. 2 - 18" AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL, TYPE I SIZE NO. 21A
CG-3 MODIFIED
NOTES:
AS STANDARD CG-3.
HEIGHT OF THE CURB AS SHOWN. MODIFIED CURB SHALL BE PAID FOR
4. THE MODIFICATION TO THE STANDARD CG-3 IS TO REDUCE THE EXPOSED
IN DEPTH.
IN THE PRICE BID IS TO BE MADE FOR A DECREASE OR AN INCREASE
OTHERWISE, THE DEPTH IS TO BE 16" AS SHOWN. NO ADJUSTMENT
WITH THE TOP OF A COURSE OF THE PAVEMENTS SUBSTRUCTURE.
IN ORDER THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE CURB WILL COINCIDE
(13" DEPTH) OR INCREASED AS MUCH AS 3" (19" DEPTH)
3. THE DEPTH OF CURB MAY BE REDUCED AS MUCH AS 3"
IF PRECAST.
2. CONCRETE TO BE CLASS A3 IF CAST IN PLACE, 4000 PSI
1. THIS ITEM MAY BE PRECAST OR CAST IN PLACE.
2" 5"
2" 3"
SURFACE
BASE
SUBBASE
7" N.T.S
SE
E
NO
TE 3
(16") 1’ 4"
2" R
1" R
FOR USE ON ROUNDABOUT TRUCK APRONS ONLY
NOT TO SCALE
12
3
45
PAVEMENT SECTION
ADT (2012)
ADT (2020)(1)
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AND TRAFFIC DATA
CLASSIFICATION
FUNCTIONAL
TC STD.
GEOMETRIC STD. GS-6
8,800
7,525
FROM:
TO:
Roundabout Design Vehicle
MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
MIN. LANE WIDTH
Urban Minor Arterial
35 MPHDESIGN SPEED (MPH)
16’-6"
11’ (2)(3)
TC-5.11 ULS
WB-40 (4)
GS-6
10,000
8,550
0.140 miles North of Route 6200.322 miles South of Rte. 620
Urban Minor Arterial
35 MPH
16’-6"
11’ (2)(3)
TC-5.11 ULS
WB-40 (4)
BRADDOCK ROAD
RTE 620
PLEASANT VALLEY ROAD
RTE 609
0.076 miles East of Route 6090.168 miles West of Rte. 609
5’ 4’
10’
1’ MINVaries3’-20’
NOTES
CP-
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
LEGEND
Mill & Overlay Pavment
Proposed Drainage Features
Proposed Lighting
Full Depth Pavement
SCALE
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
6. St’d. CG-12 Type A Req’d.
Mod. CG-3 Curb Req’d. (See Detail Sheet 1B)5.
St’d. CG-2 Curb Req’d.4.
St’d. CG-6 Curb & Gutter Req’d.3.
St’d. MS-1A Median Req’d.2.
St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d.1.
12. St’d. CG-12 Type M Req’d.
Prop. 8’ Asphalt/Stone Multi-Use Path Req’d.11.
10. Prop. Concrete Truck Apron
9. Prop. 8’ Paved Shoulder
8. St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement Conc. Sidewalk Req’d.
7. St’d. CG-12 Type B Req’d.
Asphalt Sidewalk
Conc.
Head
wall
Conc. End
wall
Inv. =2
62.0
1’
Inv. =2
61.59’
In Pl. 3
0" C
M
Pip
e
Inv. =2
64.5
4’
Inv. =2
65.0
0’
In Pl. 4
5" x 29"
Conc. Pip
e
Inv. =2
64.5
2’
Inv. =2
64.9
5’
In Pl. 4
5" x 29"
Conc. Pip
e
Barbed Wire Fence
Barbed Wire Fence
Barbed Wire Fence
Woods
Rip
Rap
Inv. =2
64.9
6’
In Pl. 4
5" x 29"
Conc. Pip
eIn
v. =2
64.5
4’
155.29’(TIE)
(N26°31
’53"E
1380.06
’)
Z
PI 119+15.5
80
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
Conc.
Well
Vegetation
Planter W/
1’ W Stone4’ Woven Wire Fence
Existing 15’ Trail Esm’t
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
Existing RWExisting RWExisting RW
Existing 15’ Trail Esm’t
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
Trav. #10
0
Asphalt Sidewalk
(N82°06’39"
W 122.10’)
Storm Drainage Easement
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
(N84
°13’29"
W 121.71’)
(N44°22’45"W 165.97’)
(S43°09’46"W 291.06’)
Prescriptive Esmt.
IPF
+32.01
4.55’
PL
171.07’(TIE)
(N61°48’4
5"W 12
3.75’)
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801Conservation Easement
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
Conservation Easement
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
Conservation Easement
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
Conservation Easement
13.8084 AC.
Tax# 043-1-01-0018-Z
COX-RICHARD FAMILY FARM LLLPDB21045 PG23
001
FAIRFAX CO PARK AUTHORITYDB12261 PG1801
146.1379 AC.
Tax# 043-3-04-A
Parcel "A"
005
NO
VE
C # 333436
NO
VE
C # 333435
NO
VE
C #333 434
3-1
3-2
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 4 -
ST
A. 210
+00.0
0
3
(703) 750 - 1000
Springfield, VA
6801 Industrial Road
Washington Gas
Gas:
Noah Dobbins (703) 464 - 7529
Herndon, Va 20171
2950 Towerview Rd. Suite 150
dba CenturyLink Government Programs
Qwest Government Services (QGS)
Wayne Haithcox (540) 522 - 3776
Herndon, VA 20170
950 Herndon Pkwy
FiberLight LLC (FBL)
Quincy Henderson (703) 480 - 7860
Herdon, VA 20171
3080 Centerville Rd.
Cox Cable
Dave Fisher (703) 350 - 8463
Reston, VA 20191
12379 Sunrise Valley Drive
Verizon Business
or (540) 520 - 1001
Rick Boswell (540) 829 - 2709
Ashburn, VA 20147
22001 Loudon County Pkwy
Verizon Va.
Telecomm:
(703) 754 - 6732
Gainesville, VA 20155
5399 Wellington Road
Northern Virginia Electric Coop.
Power:
Michael Jenkins (703) 698 - 5600
Fairfax, VA 22031
8570 Executive Park Ave
Fairfax Water Authority
Water:
Utility Owners List
Fairfax County, VA
Braddock Road
NOTES #
CP-
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
LEGEND
C
F
Mill & Overlay Pavment
Demolition of Pavement
Construction Limits in Fills
Proposed Drainage Features
Proposed Lighting
Full Depth Pavement
0
SCALE
25’ 50’
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Denotes Proposed Truck Apron
Denotes 8’ Asphalt Stone Multi-Use Path
Denotes Prop. V-Ditch
6. St’d. CG-12 Type A Req’d.
Mod. CG-3 Curb Req’d. (See Detail Sheet 1B)5.
St’d. CG-2 Curb Req’d.4.
St’d. CG-6 Curb & Gutter Req’d.3.
St’d. MS-1A Median Req’d.2.
St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d.1.
12. St’d. CG-12 Type M Req’d.
Prop. 8’ Asphalt/Stone Multi-Use Path Req’d.11.
10. Prop. Concrete Truck Apron
9. Prop. 8’ Paved Shoulder
8. St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement Conc. Sidewalk Req’d.
7. St’d. CG-12 Type B Req’d.
Denotes 5’ HCC Sidewalk
Construction Limits in Cuts
203
204
205
206
207
208
209L
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
RTE 609 CONSTR. B
POT STA. 205+14.78
RTE. 609 CONSTR. BL
C
C
210
210
PROP. R/WCONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 4
A -
ST
A. 210
+00.0
0
3A
ROUTE 609 PROFILE
CP-
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
EXISTING GRADE
Existing Grade
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
RTE 609 CONSTR. B
POT STA. 205+14.78
LPROPOSED GRADE
SPLINE GRADE
MILL & OVERLAY EXIST. PAVEMENT
SPLINE GRADE
+0.27%+0.18%265.6
0+0.33% +1.04% +1.12% +1.21% +1.21% +1.26% +1.05% +0.92% +1.35% +1.36% +1.36% +1.20% +1.19% +1.19% +1.09% +0.90%+1.01%
+0.86%
250_
255_
260_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
203+00.00 204+00.00 205+00.00 206+00.00 207+00.00 208+00.00 209+00.00 210+00.00
266.4
2
266.2
7
266.15
266.0
3
265.9
3
265.8
1
265.7
5
265.6
8
265.6
0
265.6
1
265.6
8
265.7
6
266.0
2
266.3
0
266.6
0
266.9
1
267.2
2
267.4
8
267.7
1
268.0
5
268.3
9
268.7
3
269.0
3
269.3
3
269.6
3
269.9
0
270.15
270.3
7
270.5
9
265.7
6
265.6
1
265.6
8
266.0
2
266.3
0
266.6
0
266.9
1
267.2
2
267.4
8
267.7
1
268.0
5
268.3
9
268.7
3
269.0
3
269.3
3
269.6
3
269.9
0
270.15
270.3
7
270.5
9
250_
255_
260_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
0 LF
5 LF
50 LF
SCALE
Barbed Wire Fence
Asphalt SidewalkAsphalt Sidewalk
15’ TRAIL ESM’T
Gravel Ent.
In Pl. 12" Plastic Pip
e
4’ Woven Wire Fence 4’ Woven Wire Fence 4’ Woven Wire Fence
Inv. In=
272.8
0’
Inv. O
ut= 2
72.5
0’
N 42° 34’ 46" E126
127
128
129
130
131
132
Existing RWExisting RW
Trav. #
101
Prescriptive Esmt.
(S43°17’37"W 1462.70’)
PL
Existing 15’ Trail Esm’t
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
(N43°30’47"E 1820.43’)
(S43°30’47"W 1290.58’)
( A=26.73’)
(R=192.50’)
( A=28.82’)
(R=207.50’)
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
Conservation Easement
NO
VE
C # 333437
NO
VE
C # 333432
Novec #4334111
13.8084 AC.
Tax# 043-1-01-0018-Z
COX-RICHARD FAMILY FARM LLLPDB21045 PG23
001
FAIRFAX CO PARK AUTHORITYDB12261 PG1801
146.1379 AC.
Tax# 043-3-04-A
Parcel "A"
005
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 3 -
ST
A. 210
+00.0
0
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 5 -
ST
A. 217
+00.0
0
4
NOTES #
CP-
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
LEGEND
C
F
Mill & Overlay Pavment
Demolition of Pavement
Construction Limits in Fills
Proposed Drainage Features
Proposed Lighting
Full Depth Pavement
0
SCALE
25’ 50’
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Denotes Proposed Truck Apron
Denotes 8’ Asphalt Stone Multi-Use Path
Denotes Prop. V-Ditch
6. St’d. CG-12 Type A Req’d.
Mod. CG-3 Curb Req’d. (See Detail Sheet 1B)5.
St’d. CG-2 Curb Req’d.4.
St’d. CG-6 Curb & Gutter Req’d.3.
St’d. MS-1A Median Req’d.2.
St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d.1.
12. St’d. CG-12 Type M Req’d.
Prop. 8’ Asphalt/Stone Multi-Use Path Req’d.11.
10. Prop. Concrete Truck Apron
9. Prop. 8’ Paved Shoulder
8. St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement Conc. Sidewalk Req’d.
7. St’d. CG-12 Type B Req’d.
Denotes 5’ HCC Sidewalk
Construction Limits in Cuts
211
212
PC 212
+77.2
7
213
PT 213
+70.6
9
214
215
216
217
Curve RTE609-1
PI = 213+23.98
T = 46.71’
L = 93.42’
R = 10,000.00’
212+77.27PC =
PT = 213+70.69
RTE. 609 CONSTR. BL
1
1
V = > 35 MPH
NORMAL CROWN
210
210
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 5
A -
ST
A. 217
+00.0
0
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 3
A -
ST
A. 210
+00.0
0
4A
ROUTE 609 PROFILE
CP-
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
EXISTING GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
MILL & OVERLAY EXIST. PAVEMENT
SPLINE GRADE
+0.87%
+0.85%
+0.85% +0.67% +0.68% +0.74% +0.75% +0.72% +0.77% +0.77% +0.75% +0.85% +0.85% +0.84%+0.66% +0.52% +0.40% +0.40%
+0.66%+0.60%+0.48%+0.17%+0.36% +0.42% +0.43% +0.48% +0.51% +0.51%
250_
255_
260_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
210+00.00 211+00.00 212+00.00 213+00.00 214+00.00 215+00.00 216+00.00 217+00.00
270.5
9
270.8
1
271.02
271.19
271.36
271.54
271.73
271.91
272.10
272.3
0
272.4
8
272.7
0
272.9
1
273.12
273.3
3
273.4
6
273.5
8
273.7
3
273.9
0
274.0
6
274.19
274.2
9
274.3
9
274.4
8
274.5
9
274.6
9
274.8
1
274.9
4
275.0
7
270.5
9
270.8
1
271.02
271.19
271.36
271.54
271.73
271.91
272.10
272.3
0
272.4
8
272.7
0
272.9
1
273.12
273.3
3
273.4
6
273.5
8
273.7
3
273.9
0
274.0
6
274.19
274.2
9
274.3
9
274.4
8
274.5
9
274.6
9
274.8
1
274.9
4
275.0
7
250_
255_
260_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
0 LF
5 LF
50 LF
SCALE
PLGravel P
arking
Lot
Barbed Wire Fence
Split Rail Fence
Woven
Wire Fence
36" Oak
18" Cedar
30" Oak
1 - Sty. F
r. Buildin
g
1’ Stone
Wall Planter
Water Spigot
Water Spigot
Asphalt Sidewalk
Braddock Road - R
oute 620 - G
ravel
PLEASANT VALLEY RD - RTE. 609( Variable Width RW )
(S59°31’3
6"E 502.2
4’)
Z
(N51°58’4
8"W 615.0
1’)
S59°39’3
0"E
Existin
g R/
W Per D
B13
784 P
G183
Asp
halt Sidew
alk
Fr. S
hed
Fr. S
hed
Conc.
Patio
In Pl. 12" CM
Pipe
In Pl. 23" x 14" Conc. P
ipe
Chevron
Chevron
Chevr
on
ShedFr.
She
d
Fr.
Wood Cano
py
DeckWood.
Inv. In= 276.66’
Inv. Out= 276.54’
Inv. In= 276.3
6’
Inv. Out= 2
76.12’
Inv. Out= 276.22’
Inv. In= 276.46’
PI 13
6+8
6.8
70
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
Prescriptiv
e Es
mt.
Willow8" Weeping
Willow8" Weeping
Willow8" Weeping
16" Cedar
2- 1’ W Ston
e Planters
In Pl. 2
3" x 14" Conc. Pipe
Shoulder
Asphalt
Existing RW
Trav. #145
Asphalt Di
tch
(N55°14’0
0"W 12
22.2
0’)
DB13784 PG183
Existing R/W Per
(S51°16’12"W 251.29’)
( S2102
’40"W
17.90’ )
( A=42.16’)
(R=107.50’)
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
Existing 15’ Trail Esm’t
(S43°30’47"W 107.34’)(R=192.50
’)
(R=207.50’)
( A=24.51’)
( A=26.42’)
(S33°53’11"W 10
4.17’)
(S33°53’24"W
104.49’)
( A=63.67’)
(R=207.50’)
( A=59.07’)
(R=192.50’)
(S51°28’12"W 130.23’)
(S51°28’12"W 130.23’)
S59°4
2’4
6"E
(R=25.00’)
( A=33.91’)
Z
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
Conservation Easement
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
Conservation Easement
Woo
dCanop
y
1-Sty. Fr. B
arn
PG 1111)
(DB 23370
Easement
Ex. 5’ Utility
13.8084 AC.
Tax# 043-1-01-0018-Z
COX-RICHARD FAMILY FARM LLLPDB21045 PG23
001
Tax# 043-1-01-0013-Z
3.6696 AC.
COX-RICHARD FAMILY FARM LLLPDB21045 PG23
002
FAIRFAX CO PARK AUTHORITYDB12261 PG1801
146.1379 AC.
Tax# 043-3-04-A
Parcel "A"
005
Tax# 043-1-01-0010
DB16486 PG838
67.2634 AC.
FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITY
004
FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITYDB12604 PG550
39.763 AC.Tax# 043-1-01-0003-A
003
Novec #433412
0
NO
VE
C # 333412
1
NOVEC # 3334119
NOVEC # 3334118
NOVEC # 333
428
NOVEC
# 333
429
NO
VE
C # 333424
BA Telephone B
ox
Guy Pole
NOVEC #333 41 22
U/G FO B
ox
12 Guy Wires
2- FO M
arkers8 Guy Wires
LP NOVE
C # 3334123
(FB
L)
EOI
Elec.
Outlet
FO1
FO2
Elec. Outl
et
Elec. Outlet
Elec. OutletElec. Outlet
MATCHLINE SHEET 5B - STA. 107
+75.00
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 4 -
ST
A. 217
+00.0
0
MATCHLIN
E SHEET
5D - S
TA. 111+2
5.00
EXIST. RW
5
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 6 -
ST
A. 224+0
0.0
0
NOTES #
CP-
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
LEGEND
C
F
Mill & Overlay Pavment
Demolition of Pavement
Construction Limits in Fills
Proposed Drainage Features
Proposed Lighting
Full Depth Pavement
0
SCALE
25’ 50’
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Denotes Proposed Truck Apron
Denotes 8’ Asphalt Stone Multi-Use Path
Denotes Prop. V-Ditch
6. St’d. CG-12 Type A Req’d.
Mod. CG-3 Curb Req’d. (See Detail Sheet 1B)5.
St’d. CG-2 Curb Req’d.4.
St’d. CG-6 Curb & Gutter Req’d.3.
St’d. MS-1A Median Req’d.2.
St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d.1.
12. St’d. CG-12 Type M Req’d.
Prop. 8’ Asphalt/Stone Multi-Use Path Req’d.11.
10. Prop. Concrete Truck Apron
9. Prop. 8’ Paved Shoulder
8. St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement Conc. Sidewalk Req’d.
7. St’d. CG-12 Type B Req’d.
Denotes 5’ HCC Sidewalk
Construction Limits in Cuts
5-10
5-11
5-5
5-6
5-13
5-7A
5-9
5-3
5-4
5-17
5-12
5-14
5-7
5-2
5-8
15"
15"
15"
15"
15"
15"
15"
15"
15"
15"
15"
15"
5-3A
42"
42"
36"
36"
15"
5-10A
5-15
5-16
PROP. R/W PROP. R/W
PROP. R/W
PROP. R/W
PR
OP. R/
W
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
EASEMENT
CONSTR.
PROP. TEMP.
108
PC 108+54.13
PT 108+94.58
109
PC 109+44.29
110
PT 110+
21.52
PC 111+2
0.73
PC 217
+48.13
218
219
PT 219
+72.6
6
220
PC 220+2
8.16
221
PRC 221+1
4.83
PT 221+7
6.4
2
222
223
PRC 223+04.23
PT 224+2
1.02
Curve RTE620-9
PI = 108+74.40
T = 20.27’
L = 40.45’
R = 251.00’
108+54.13PC =
PT = 108+94.58
Curve RTE609-5
PI = 222+87.89
T = 16.39’
L = 32.74’
R = 251.00’
222+71.49
223+04.23
PC =
PRC =
PI = 218+60.40
Curve RTE609-2
T = 112.27’
L = 224.53’
R = 10,000.00’
217+48.13PC =
PT = 219+72.66
Curve RTE609-3
PI = 220+71.93
T = 43.77’
L = 86.67’
R = 251.00’
220+28.16PC =
PRC =221+14.83
Curve RTE609-4
PI = 221+45.78
T = 30.95’
L = 61.59’
R = 251.00’
221+14.83PRC =
PT = 221+76.42
PI = 223+63.70
Curve RTE609-6
T = 59.47’
L = 116.79’
R = 251.00’
223+04.23PRC =
PT = 224+21.02
PC 222+71.49
221
PC 221+6
3.3
7
222
PT 22
2+21.
46
9
1
1
6
3
3
2
2
7
7
2
3
3
7
8
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
5
5
4
4
2
33
11
10
10
L
BEGIN PROJECT
RTE 609 CONSTR. B
POT STA. 217+22.66
LRTE. 609 CONSTR. B
13
3
4
2
5
9
2
5
9
10
3
4
13
LRTE. 609 AUX. CONSTR. B
CF
CF
217
111
L
LPOT 109+37.27 RTE. 620 CONSTR. B
= 87°52.33" RT.
PI 222+16.96 RTE. 609 CONSTR. B
6
V = 25 MPH
NORMAL CROWN (ULS)
V = 25 MPH
NORMAL CROWN (ULS)
V = 25 MPH
NORMAL CROWN (ULS)
V = 25 MPH
NORMAL CROWN (ULS)
V = > 45 MPH
NORMAL CROWNV = 25 MPH
NORMAL CROWN (ULS)
P0
T 220+2
8.16
Curve 609AUX-13
PI = 221+95.87
T = 32.50’
L = 58.09’
R = 52.00’
221+63.37PC =
PT = 222+21.46
6
Curve RTE620-3
PI = 109+83.21
T = 38.93’
L = 77.24’
R = 251.00’
109+44.29PC =
PT = 110+21.52
10
V = 25 MPH
NORMAL CROWN (ULS)
EXIST. CONC. PATIO
DO NOT DISTURB
FC
12
12
12
12
12
CF
FC
224
224
12’
12’
12’
12’
12’
12’
12’
12’
12’
15’
15’
30’5’
9
9
YIE
LD
YIELD
YI
EL
D
YIELD
ON
LY
ROUTE 609 PROFILE
ROUTE 620 PROFILE
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 6
A -
ST
A. 224+0
0.0
0
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 4
A -
ST
A. 217
+00.0
0
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 5
C -
ST
A. 10
7+7
5.0
0
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 5
E -
ST
A. 111+25.0
0
5ACP-
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
EXISTING GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED GRADE
L
BEGIN PROJECT
RTE 609 CONSTR. B
POT STA. 217+22.66
SPLINE GRADE
MILL & OVERLAY EXIST. PAVEMENTSPLINE GRADE
+0.43%
275.2
5
+0.84% +0.49% +0.46% +0.50% +0.72%
V = 60 MPH
STA = 219+28.16
EL = 276.49
L = 100.00
K = 192
ex = -0.07’
SSD = 2122’
+0.22%
STA = 220+28.16
EL = 276.69
L = 100.00
K = 108
ex = 0.12’
V = 50 MPH
+1.13%
STA = 221+66.96
EL = 278.26
+2.00% -2.00%
STA = 222+16.96
EL = 279.26
STA = 222+66.96
EL = 278.26
+0.74%
ROUNDABOUT GRADEPROPOSED RAISED
EXISTING GRADE
+0.51%
217+00.00 218+00.00 219+00.00 220+00.00 221+00.00 222+00.00 223+00.00 224+00.00
275.0
7
275.19
275.3
1
275.4
4
275.5
6
275.6
7
275.8
0
275.9
4
276.11
276.2
2
276.3
2
276.4
1
276.5
1
276.5
6
276.6
1
276.7
1
276.8
2
276.4
9
277.12
277.2
0
277.2
0
277.7
2
277.3
2
277.8
9
277.9
4
277.7
6
277.7
4
278.0
8
278.2
5
275.0
7
275.19
275.5
6
275.3
5
275.6
8
275.8
0
275.9
2
276.10
276.2
7
276.4
1
276.5
1
276.5
8
276.6
6
276.7
9
276.9
8
277.2
2
277.5
1
277.7
9
278.0
7
278.4
2
278.9
2
279.10
278.6
0
278.3
2
278.5
1
278.6
9
278.8
7
279.0
6
279.2
4
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
108+00.00 109+00.00 110+00.00 111+00.00
278.7
1
278.4
9
278.3
8
278.2
8
278.12
277.7
6
277.3
4
277.6
3
278.0
0
277.7
4
277.8
7
278.0
8
278.4
0
278.7
7
278.9
0
278.8
3
278.6
3
278.5
2
278.4
2
278.3
2
278.5
2
279.0
2
279.0
1
278.5
1
278.3
5
278.4
9
278.6
3
278.7
7
278.9
1
279.0
4
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADEEXISTING GRADE
-0.88% -0.44% -0.39% -0.43%
+2.00% -2.00%
STA = 108+87.27
EL = 278.26
STA = 109+37.27
EL = 279.26
STA = 109+87.27
EL = 278.26
+0.56%
ROUNDABOUT GRADEPROPOSED RAISED
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
295_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
295_
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
0 LF
5 LF
50 LF
SCALE
PL
PL PL
Gravel Road
Gravel Road
4’ Split Rail Fence
Gravel Parking Lot
Row of Cedar Trees
Row of Trees and Brush
Braddock Road - Route 620 - Gravel
(S51°58’48"E 692.01’)(S
25°44’2
4"W 260.3
3’)
(N33°29’0
5"E 245.3
6’)
Per D
B 210
44 P
G873
Ex. 30’ Ingress-E
gress Esmt.
Gravel Parking Lot
1’ W Wooden Planter
2
Metal Posts
4’ Split Rail Fence
(S58°56’53"E 227.83’)
Prescriptive Esmt.
In Pl. 23" x 14" C
onc. Pipe
Ex. 5’ Utility Easement ( DB 23370 PG 1111)
( DB 23370 PG 1111)
Ex. 5’ Utility Easement
PLN25°3
9’13"E
(N25°44’2
4"E 15
5.9
5’)
N25°40’11"E
(S59°31’36"E 128.09’)
PL
(N51°58’48"W 615.01’)
Tax# 043-1-01-0013-Z
3.6696 AC.
COX-RICHARD FAMILY FARM LLLPDB21045 PG23
002
CO
X-RIC
HA
RD
FA
MIL
Y F
AR
M
LLLP
FAIR
FA
X
CO
UN
TY P
AR
K
AU
TH
ORIT
YTax# 043-1-0
1-0003-A
FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITYDB12604 PG550
39.763 AC.Tax# 043-1-01-0003-A
003
Tax# 043-1-01-0017-Z
AARON COX-RICHARD DB21044 PG873
5.0 AC.
NO
VE
C # 333416
NO
VE
C # 333415
4
Guy
Wires
NO
VE
C #3330410
17
Novec #3330410
07
(FBL)
Elec.
Outlet
Elec.
Outlet
Elec.
Outlet
Elec.
Outlet
Elec.
Outlet
Elec.
Outlet
Elec.
Outlet
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 5 -
ST
A. 10
7+7
5.0
0
5B
NOTES #
CP-
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
LEGEND
C
F
Mill & Overlay Pavment
Demolition of Pavement
Construction Limits in Fills
Proposed Drainage Features
Proposed Lighting
Full Depth Pavement
0
SCALE
25’ 50’
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Denotes Proposed Truck Apron
Denotes 8’ Asphalt Stone Multi-Use Path
Denotes Prop. V-Ditch
6. St’d. CG-12 Type A Req’d.
Mod. CG-3 Curb Req’d. (See Detail Sheet 1B)5.
St’d. CG-2 Curb Req’d.4.
St’d. CG-6 Curb & Gutter Req’d.3.
St’d. MS-1A Median Req’d.2.
St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d.1.
12. St’d. CG-12 Type M Req’d.
Prop. 8’ Asphalt/Stone Multi-Use Path Req’d.11.
10. Prop. Concrete Truck Apron
9. Prop. 8’ Paved Shoulder
8. St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement Conc. Sidewalk Req’d.
7. St’d. CG-12 Type B Req’d.
Denotes 5’ HCC Sidewalk
Construction Limits in Cuts
5D-3
5D-1
5D-2
15"
15"
15"
101 103 104
PC 10
4+2
2.0
9
105
106
107
PT 10
7+2
8.7
8Curve RTE620-8
PI = 105+75.45
T = 153.36’
L = 306.69’
R = 10,000.00’
104+22.09
107+28.78
PC =
PT =
3
3
L
LPOT STA. 100+50.00 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B
END CONSTRUCTION
STA. 100+50.00 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B
LRTE. 620 CONSTR. B
8
8
BEGIN PROJECT 0620-029-017, P-101
LE
NT
R. #1
CO
NS
TR.
B
CF
POT 10
9+3
7.2
7 R
TE. 620
CO
NS
TR.
B
=
87°52.3
3" R
T.
PI 222+16.9
6
RT
E. 609
CO
NS
TR.
B
V = > 45 MPH
NORMAL CROWN
POT 106+08.00 RTE. 620 CONSTR. B
L
L
= 90°00" RT.
PI 10+00.00 ENTR. #1 CONSTR. B
33
102
POT 101+62.44 RTE. 620 CONSTR. B
L
L
= 90°00" LT.
PI 10+00.00 ENTR. #2 CONSTR. B
40’FC TO FC
POT 10+80.25
RE
Q’D., W
=40’
ST’D.
CG-11
AS
PH
ALT
EN
TR
AN
CE
EN
TR
AN
CE
RE
Q’D., W
=40’ (F
C
TO F
C)
ST’D. A
SP
HA
LT
CO
MM
ER
CIA
L
3
3
C
C F
F C
CC
12’
12’
12’
12’
12’
PROP. R/W
PROP. R/W
PROP. R/W
PROP. R/W
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
ENTRANCE RECONSTRUCTION
CONSTR. EASEMENT FOR
PROP. TEMPORARY
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
PROP. R/W
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
EAS
EM
EN
T
CO
NS
TR.
PR
OP. T
EM
P.
RTE. 620 PROFILE
ENTRANCE #1
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 5
A -
ST
A. 10
7+7
5.0
0
300_
295_
290_
285_
280_
275_
270_
289.5
4
288.4
0
289.7
8
289.9
6
288.9
0
289.3
0
10+00.00
ENTRANCE #2
5CCP-
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
L
L
BEGIN PROJECT 0620-029-017, P-101
L
L
390’ SIGHT DISTANCE
390’ SIGHT DISTANCE
EYE 3.5’
OBJECT 3.5’
POT STA. 100+50.00 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B
END CONSTRUCTION
STA. 100+50.00 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B
+0.82%
290.2
8
-2.18%
286.2
3
-2.62% -2.76% -2.76% -2.58% -2.51% -1.77% -1.58% -1.60% -1.31% -1.19%
106+0
8.0
0
RT
E. 620
CO
NS
TR.
B
10+0
0.0
0
EN
TR. #
1 C
ONS
TR.
B
-1.20%
10+0
0.0
0
EN
TR. #
2
CO
NS
TR.
B
101+62.4
4
RT
E. 620
CO
NS
TR.
B
-0.95% -0.92% -0.91% -0.88% -0.98% -0.92%
L
L
L
L
-1.93 %
-1.96 %-1.88 %
-1.88 %-1.80 %
-1.80 %
-1.64%-1.20 %
-1.30%
101+00.00 102+00.00 103+00.00 104+00.00 105+00.00 106+00.00 107+00.00
290.2
8
290.0
6
290.2
3
289.9
3
289.5
2
289.0
7
288.6
2
288.15
287.6
8
287.19
286.6
5
286.10
285.5
6
284.9
0
284.2
1
283.5
2
282.8
8
282.2
5
281.81
281.41
281.01
280.6
9
280.3
9
280.0
9
279.8
6
279.6
3
279.4
1
279.19
278.9
4
278.7
1
290.2
8
290.2
3
289.9
3
289.5
2
289.0
7
288.6
2
288.15
287.6
8
287.19
286.7
1
286.2
3
286.7
0
285.6
8
285.0
3
284.3
4
283.6
5
283.0
0
282.3
8
281.93
281.54
281.10
280.8
1
280.5
2
280.2
2
279.9
9
279.7
6
279.5
3
279.3
1
279.0
6
278.8
3
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
295_
300_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
280.2
9
281.05
281.06
280.4
2
280.7
8
10+00.00
EL = 280.27
STA = 10+12.09
+4.00%
-1.24%
EP
280.4
2
281.06
+0.05%
EN
D
CO
NS
TR.
STA = 10+31.64
EL = 281.05
L = 20.00
K = 5
ex = -0.10’
SSD = 284’
V = 15 MPH
290_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
295_
STA = 10+57.00
EL = 288.26
289.2
5
289.6
4
-33.3
3%
STA = 10+60.00
EL = 287.26
+33.3
3%-2.00%
0 LF
5 LF
50 LF
SCALE
PL
Woven Wire Fence
Barbed Wire Fence
4’ Chain Link Fence
Barbed Wire Fence
Woods
Cemetary
Braddock Road - Route 620
( Variable Width RW )
(N52°36’02"W 550.00’) (N52°36’02"W 16.48’)
(N52°36’02"W 214.74’)
Existing RWN59°03’17"W
N59°03’17"W
N59°03’17"W
(S58°45’56"E 1084.94’)Existing RW
Existing RWN58°49’39"WTrav. #12
Trav. #
11
Trav. #
13
Existing RW
Trav. #11
N58°59’37"W 214.74’
Trav. #13
IPF+44.50
561.78’ IPF+92.55
770.93’
PL
(S37°23’5
8"W 202.8
5’)
PL
+42.20
516.30’
S31°0
0’2
3"W
N31°00’2
3"E
(N37°2
3’5
8"E 202.8
5’)
PL
IPF
Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
Conservation Easement Per Plat DB12261 PG1801
Conservation Easement
Per Plat
DB12
261 P
G18
01
Conservation Ease
ment
CATHOLIC CHURCH
DB4215 PG0256
1.0000 AC.
Tax# 043-1-01-0009
MOST REV T J WELSH
BISHOP OF ARLINGTON VA
Tax# 043-1-01-0010
DB16486 PG838
67.2634 AC.
FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITY
004
FAIRFAX CO PARK AUTHORITYDB12261 PG1801
146.1379 AC.
Tax# 043-3-04-A
Parcel "A"
005
NO
VE
C # 333425
NO
VE
C # 333429
NO
VE
C # 333426
NO
VE
C # 333427
U/
G F
O
Box
FO
Marker
FO
Marker
(FBL)
U/
G F
OH
H
FO1
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 5 - S
TA. 111+2
5.0
0
5D
NOTES #
CP-
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
LEGEND
C
F
Mill & Overlay Pavment
Demolition of Pavement
Construction Limits in Fills
Proposed Drainage Features
Proposed Lighting
Full Depth Pavement
0
SCALE
25’ 50’
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Denotes Proposed Truck Apron
Denotes 8’ Asphalt Stone Multi-Use Path
Denotes Prop. V-Ditch
6. St’d. CG-12 Type A Req’d.
Mod. CG-3 Curb Req’d. (See Detail Sheet 1B)5.
St’d. CG-2 Curb Req’d.4.
St’d. CG-6 Curb & Gutter Req’d.3.
St’d. MS-1A Median Req’d.2.
St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d.1.
12. St’d. CG-12 Type M Req’d.
Prop. 8’ Asphalt/Stone Multi-Use Path Req’d.11.
10. Prop. Concrete Truck Apron
9. Prop. 8’ Paved Shoulder
8. St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement Conc. Sidewalk Req’d.
7. St’d. CG-12 Type B Req’d.
Denotes 5’ HCC Sidewalk
Construction Limits in Cuts
5F-1
5-1
15"
PROP. R/W
PROP. R/W
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
PC 111+20.7
3
112
PT 112
+43.8
8
113
114
115
116
117
118
9
9
L
LPOC STA. 113+39.36 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B
END CONSTRUCTION
STA. 113+39.36 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B
LRTE. 620 CONSTR. B
11
11
END PROJECT 0620-029-017, P-101
C
F
V =
25
MP
H
NO
RM
AL C
RO
WN (U
LS)
V = 40 MPH
NORMAL CROWN (ULS)
221+63.3
7222+2
1.46
Curve RTE620-11
PI = 111+82.38
T = 61.65’
L = 123.15’
R = 1,000.00’
111+20.73PC =
112+43.88PT =
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 5
A -
ST
A. 111+25.0
0
RTE. 620 PROFILE
5ECP-
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
112+00.00 113+00.00 114+00.00 115+00.00 116+00.00
278.9
0
278.9
8
279.0
6
279.2
4
279.4
3
279.6
2
279.8
6
280.10
280.3
3
280.5
8
280.8
5
281.10
281.38
281.68
282.0
4
282.4
8
282.9
3
283.4
8
284.0
4
284.6
0
279.0
4
279.18
279.3
2
279.4
6
279.6
0
279.7
6
279.9
9
280.2
2
280.3
7
255_
260_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
295_
300_
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
LPOC STA. 113+39.36 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. B
END CONSTRUCTION
STA. 113+39.36 ROUTE 620 CONSTR. BL
END PROJECT 0620-029-017, P-101
+0.66%+0.94% +0.94% +0.61%
280.4
4
255_
260_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
295_
300_
0 LF
5 LF
50 LF
SCALE
PL
Woods
Pleasant Valley Road - Route 609
( 30’ Prescritive RW )
PI 14
6+5
5.4
60
N 43° 58’ 46" E
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
(S49°00’00"W 729.47’)
(N51°07’04"E 1337.28’)
Prescriptive Esmt.
N44°40’00"E
(S41°0
0’0
0"E 437.0
5’)
PLS45°2
8’46"E
Tax# 043-1-01-0010
DB16486 PG838
67.2634 AC.
FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITY
004
FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITY
FAIRFAX COUNTY PARK AUTHORITYDB12604 PG550
39.763 AC.Tax# 043-1-01-0003-A
003
NO
VE
C # 333423
NO
VE
C # 333424
NO
VE
C # 333422
BA Telephone B
ox
6
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 5 -
ST
A. 224+0
0.0
0
NOTES #
CP-
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
LEGEND
C
F
Mill & Overlay Pavment
Demolition of Pavement
Construction Limits in Fills
Proposed Drainage Features
Proposed Lighting
Full Depth Pavement
0
SCALE
25’ 50’
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Denotes Proposed Truck Apron
Denotes 8’ Asphalt Stone Multi-Use Path
Denotes Prop. V-Ditch
6. St’d. CG-12 Type A Req’d.
Mod. CG-3 Curb Req’d. (See Detail Sheet 1B)5.
St’d. CG-2 Curb Req’d.4.
St’d. CG-6 Curb & Gutter Req’d.3.
St’d. MS-1A Median Req’d.2.
St’d. MS-1 Median Req’d.1.
12. St’d. CG-12 Type M Req’d.
Prop. 8’ Asphalt/Stone Multi-Use Path Req’d.11.
10. Prop. Concrete Truck Apron
9. Prop. 8’ Paved Shoulder
8. St’d. 5’ Hydr. Cement Conc. Sidewalk Req’d.
7. St’d. CG-12 Type B Req’d.
Denotes 5’ HCC Sidewalk
Construction Limits in Cuts
6-16-1A
15"
15"
PROP. R/W
PROP. R/W
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
UTILITY EASMENT
VDOT JOINT-USE
PROP. PERMANENT
EASEMENT
CONSTR.
PROP. TEMP.
CONSTR. EASEMENT
PROP. TEMPORARY
PROP. R/W
PROP. R/W
PT 224+2
1.02
PC 224+9
5.6
7
225
226
PT 226+2
2.3
4
227
228
PO
T 228+6
7.0
6
Curve RTE609-7
PI = 225+59.33
T = 63.66’
L = 126.66’
R = 510.00’
224+95.67PC =
PT = 226+22.34
3
9
3
2
L
LRTE. 609 CONSTR. B
7
7
END CONSTRUCTION
RTE 609 CONSTR. B
POT STA. 229+85.27
F
V = 25 MPH
NORMAL CROWN (ULS)
V = 35 MPH
NORMAL CROWN (ULS)
V = 25 MPH
NORMAL CROWN (ULS)
Curve R
TE620-11
PO
T 230+2
5.0
0
229
230
33
POT 228+47.32 RTE. 609 CONSTR. B
L
L
= 90°00" LT.
PI 10+00.00 ENTR. #3 CONSTR. B
40’
FC TO FC
POT 10+82.20
EN
TR
AN
CE
RE
Q’D., W
=40’ (F
C
TO F
C)
ST’D. A
SP
HA
LT
CO
MM
ER
CIA
L
C
CF
FC
224
224
11’
11’
FF
MA
TC
HLIN
E
SH
EE
T 5
A -
ST
A. 224+0
0.0
0
RTE. 609 PROFILE
ENTRANCE #3
283.13
282.3
6
282.6
1
282.7
2
282.8
0
282.3
0
10+00.00
6ACP-
Fairfax County, Virginia
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501
Contract ID No.: C00103318DB71
Braddock Road and Pleasant Valley Road Intersection Improvments
IATMA. ORTON HOMAS AND SSOCIATES, NC.
PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
EYE 3.5’
390’ SIGHT DISTANCE
OBJECT 3.5’
390’ SIGHT DISTANCE
L
L
END CONSTRUCTION
LRTE 609 CONSTR. B
POT STA. 229+85.27
+0.74%
STA = 226+22.34
EL = 280.88
+0.84% +1.03% +0.69%
EXISTING GRADE
281.77
228+4
7.3
2
RT
E. 609
CO
NS
TR.
B
10+0
0.0
0
EN
TR. #
3
CO
NS
TR.
B
224+00.00 225+00.00 226+00.00 227+00.00 228+00.00 229+00.00
278.2
5
278.5
1
278.8
6
279.16
278.8
7
279.8
5
280.12
280.3
9
280.5
8
280.7
7
280.9
9
281.24
281.50
281.66
281.97
282.2
8
282.5
5
282.8
3
283.18
283.6
1
284.0
4
284.5
1
285.0
2
285.5
3
279.2
4
279.4
3
279.6
1
279.7
9
279.9
8
280.16
280.3
5
280.5
3
280.7
1
280.9
0
281.11
281.37
281.54
281.71
255_
260_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
255_
260_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
STA = 10+59.11
EL = 282.12
283.0
8
282.7
4
-2.00%
-33.3
3% +3
3.3
3%
STA = 10+62.11
EL = 281.12 255_
260_
265_
270_
275_
280_
285_
290_
0 LF
5 LF
50 LF
SCALE
Section 4.2.8Compliance Statement
&
Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection ImprovementA Design-Build ProjectFairfax County, Virginia
From: 0.168 miles west of Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)To: 0.076 miles east of Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)
Price Proposal
State Project No.: (NFO) 0620-029-017, P101, R201, C501Federal Project No.: STP-5A01 (382)
Contract ID Number: C00103318DB71
Proposal Submitted By:
& April 24, 2014
Section 4.3.1Attachment 4.3.1Price Proposal Form
Section 4.3.2Price Adjustment Information and Forms
Section 4.3.3Proposal Guaranty
Section 4.3.4Forms C-104 and C-105
Attachments 4.3.4 (a) and 4.3.4 (b)
&
top related