grav-d project update

GRAV-D Project Update

Vicki Childers, Ph.D.GRAV-D Project Manager

• Replace the Vertical Datum of the USA by 2022 (at today’s funding) with a gravimetric geoid accurate to 1 cm

• Orthometric heights accessed via GNSS accurate to 2 cm

• Three thrusts of project:– Airborne gravity survey of entire

country and its holdings– Long-term monitoring of geoid

change– Partnership surveys

• Working to launch a collaborative effort with the USGS for simultaneous magnetic measurement

Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D)

January 10, 2012 2Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting

January 10, 2012 3

Building a Gravity Field

Long Wavelengths:(≥ 350 km)

GRACE and GOCE (not shown)

Intermediate Wavelengths(500 km to 20 km)

Airborne Measurement

Surface Measurement

Short Wavelengths(< 100 km)

+

+

Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting

January 10, 2012 Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting 4

Ship gravity

Terrestrial gravity

New Orleans

20-100 km gravity gaps along coast

• Field is not sampled uniformly

• Data range in age and quality, some w/o metadata

• Some surveys have systematic errors

• Data gaps in littoral areas

Problems with Gravity Holdings

GRAV-D Update

5

Alaska FY8-12 West Coast FY11

Great Lakes FY11-13

FY8-10 = GreenFY11 = BlueFY12 = OrangeFY13 = White

FY12 Texas

15.6% of total area is

surveyed (as of 11-23-11)

January 10, 2012

Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting

GRAV-D Aircraft

• NOAA – Gulfstream Jet Prop– NOAA P-3 Hurricane Hunter

• DOI Bureau of Land Management– Pilatus PC-12

• Fugro– King Air E-90A

• Naval Research Lab– King Air RC-12

January 10, 2012 Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting 6

Pilatus PC-12King Air E-90A

Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting

http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/GRAV-D/data_products.shtml

Data Distribution

January 10, 2012 7

Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting

http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/GRAV-D/data_products.shtml

Data Distribution

January 10, 2012 8

Data Products• Detailed map of region• Data download link to zip

file: – ReadMe text file– gravity data file– supplementary data file – block data user manual – GRAV-D data general user

manual – xml metadata– kml block extent and

block data lines.• Gridded image of gravity

data• Older versions if available

January 10, 2012 Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting 9

Future Contracting Plans• Minimum of 10% of annual surveying will be

contracted out (~100 flight hours/yr) • Contract Aircraft Services

– FY11 Fugro: 10.7%– FY12 Fugro (estimated): 20.6%

• If additional funding can be found, the percentage of contract surveying would be increased

• Explore options for dedicated aircraft enabled for magnetic measurement

11January 10, 2012 Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting

GRAV-D Federal Partnerships

• Department of Interior– Bureau of Land Management: shared use of Pilatus

aircraft– US Geological Survey: launching effort to collect

simultaneous magnetic measurements• Naval Research Laboratory

– VXS-1 Squadron aircraft services• National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA)

– Funded AK survey in 2009– Absolute and relative gravimetry coordination

12January 10, 2012 Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting

Summary

• GRAV-D project is on course for completion in 2022

• Involvement with contract data services is planned at the 10% level minimum

• The new vertical datum produced by this effort will be invaluable for all geospatial concerns

13January 10, 2012 Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting

GRAV-D Contracting Expenditures

• Contract employees:– FY11: 24.5% of total expenditures– FY12 (planned): 24.8%

• Contract Surveys– FY11 Fugro: 10.7%– FY12 Fugro (estimated): 20.6%

• Fugro– Provided aircraft and operator in FY11– Exploring option for data products in FY12

10January 10, 2012 Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting

Geoid Slope Validation Survey

January 10, 2012 Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting 14

325 km218 points1.5 km apart

Austin

Rockport

• Observe geoid shape (slope) using multiple independent terrestrial survey methods– GPS + Leveling– Deflections of the Vertical

• Compare observed slopes (from terrestrial surveys) to modeled slopes (from gravimetry or satellites)– With / Without new GRAV-D

airborne gravity

Geoid Slope Survey Conclusions• Including airborne gravity data improves geoid

slope accuracy at nearly all distances <325 km• The NGS geoid in the TX survey meets the 1

cm accuracy objective only if airborne data are included– No other model achieved 1 cm accuracy

• Gravimetric geoid models and GPS are a viable alternative to long-line leveling

January 10, 2012 Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Meeting 15