an introduction to monitoring and evaluation in outcome mapping applied and adapted use bern, 15...

25
An introduction to An introduction to Monitoring and Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Mapping Applied and adapted use Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Upload: colin-dawson

Post on 20-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

An introduction to Monitoring An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome and Evaluation in Outcome

MappingMapping

Applied and adapted useApplied and adapted use

Bern, 15 April 2010

Page 2: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010
Page 3: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010
Page 4: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

ACTIVITIES

OUTPUTS

OUTCOMES

IMPACT

INPUTS

Applied Monitoring

Inspired by Jeff Conklin, cognexus.org

Time

Page 5: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

ACTIVITIES

OUTPUTS

OUTCOMES

IMPACT

INPUTS

Applied Monitoring

Inspired by Jeff Conklin, cognexus.org

Time

Page 6: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

ACTIVITIES

OUTPUTS

OUTCOMES

IMPACT

INPUTS

Applied Monitoring

Inspired by Jeff Conklin, cognexus.org

Time

Performance

Your programme’s functioning as an organizational unit

Page 7: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

ACTIVITIES

OUTPUTS

OUTCOMES

IMPACT

INPUTS

Applied Monitoring

Inspired by Jeff Conklin, cognexus.org

Time

Strategy

The effectiveness of how you are attempting to influence boundary partners

Page 8: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

ACTIVITIES

OUTPUTS

OUTCOMES

IMPACT

INPUTS

Applied Monitoring

Inspired by Jeff Conklin, cognexus.org

Time

Outcomes

Change you influence in the boundary

partners

Page 9: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Adapted Monitoring

For example…You have no baselineAre in complex situations where relations of cause and effect are unknownAre a non-hierarchal organisation

Page 10: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

ACTIVITIES

OUTPUTS

OUTCOMES

IMPACT

INPUTS

Inspired by Jeff Conklin, cognexus.org

Time

Situations in which this…

Page 11: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Looks like this

Page 12: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

OUTPUT

OUTCOME

INPUTS

ACTIVITY

INPUTSACTIVITY

INPUTS

ACTIVITY

INPUTS

OUTPUT

OUTPUT

ACTIVITY

OUTPUT

OUTPUT

OUTCOME

OUTCOME

OUTCOME

OUTCOME

OUTCOME

OUTCOME

Page 13: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

You monitor by

Watching social actors for changes in their behaviour, relationships, actions, policies or practices

Focusing on the outcomes you are achieving

Working backwards from outcomes to determine how you contributed to that change, rather than attempt to attribute the change to your activities

And then deciding how to improve strategy and organisational performance in order to achieve outcomes

Page 14: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010
Page 15: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Evaluation is the least developed of the three stages of Outcome Mapping, formally at least.

Limited to designing the Evaluation Plan.

Page 16: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Elements of an Outcome Mapping Evaluation Plan

EXAMPLE EVALUATION PLAN

Evaluation Issue: Results Achieved by Recipient Research Institutions

Who Will Use the Evaluation?

How? When?Questions

Information Sources

Evaluation Methods

Who Will Conduct and Manage the Evaluation?

Date (Start

& Finish)

Cost

Executive director to use findings to inform program proposal

What influence has the institution had on research users and other researchers?

Progress Markers & Outcome JournalTrip reportsStrategy Journal

Key informant interviews with program staff

Senior Consultant with regional and sectoral expertise

Six months

35K

www.idrc.ca/evaluation

Page 17: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

But as with monitoring, the outcome concept is wonderfully adaptable.

It can potentially serve the three principal evaluation modes.

Page 18: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Formative evaluation

18

Page 19: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Summative evaluation

19

Page 20: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Developmental evaluation

Page 21: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Examples of formal evaluationsTreatment response for

problematic use of ecstasy, ketamine and gamma-hydroxybutyrate in Australia

Six civil society projects in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Community development program with Roma and non-Roma communities in Bosnia and Herzegovina

OM applied as a planning, monitoring and evaluation tool to the Ceja Andina project in Carchi, Ecuador

A working group on 'values’

Page 22: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Examples of adaption of Outcome Mapping in evaluation

7 international networks – 2 based in Latin America, 2 in Europe, 2 in Asia, and I in the USA.

8 programmes of five grant makers – Oxfam Novib, IDRC, Ford Foundation, Hivos, and the Open Society Institute

Their 130+ social change and development grantees

Outcomes not predefined

Page 23: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Evaluation

■ Internal outcomes

■ External outcomes

■ Their significance

■ The organisation’s contribution

Page 24: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

In these evaluations we “harvested” descriptions of who changed what, when and where, its significance and the contribution of the organisation.

In addition, we substantiate the outcomes with independent third parties who have a working knowledge of the change and how it came about.

We mapped processes of change to understand how outcomes reinforce or undermine each other.

Page 25: An introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation in Outcome Mapping Applied and adapted use Bern, 15 April 2010

Thank you! For more information, examples of use and to share your experiences

www.outcomemapping.cawww.idrc.ca/evaluation

[email protected]