antibioprophylaxis in surgery and mdros atelier antibioprophylaxie en chirurgie workshop antibiotica...
TRANSCRIPT
Antibioprophylaxis in surgery and MDROs
Atelier antibioprophylaxie en chirurgieWorkshop Antibiotica profylaxe in de chirurgie
Baudouin Byl
Hygiène Hospitalière
et Gestion de l’antibiothérapie
Hôpital Erasme – ULB
Plan
• MDR definition• Prophylaxis – spectrum - principles• Literature – prophylaxis et SSI MDROs• Discussion
Definition MDR
• Clinical microb infec 2011: 18(3), 268-281
Definition MDR
2013 9
Antibioprophylaxiscommon principles
• Limited to well proven indications• Targeted to organisms involved in SSI• Timing of administration• Perop administration if needed• Duration < 24 hrs
2013 10
Antibioprophylaxis
• new recommendations Bratzler DW et al
Am J Health-Sys Pharm
Vol 70, feb1, 2013
previous:
Clin Infect Dis, 1994; 18: 422-427
ASHPIDSASHEASIS
Spectrum
• The narrowest
• Resistance patterns from organisms causing SSI should take precedence over hospitalwide antibiograms
• In some cases, procedure-specific resistance patterns!
Consensus 2013
2013 12
Spectrum
• Skin incision: SSI:
~ 80% Gram positive~ 20% Gram négative
First choice: anti-staph (oxa-S) + anti bgn cef 1 (cef2)
2013 14
From 1994 to 2013 …
• Dramatic decrease in sensitivity to cef1 (cef2)
• MDR ….
2013 15
• R rate cef1 cef2, enterobacterial species Erasme• 1993-2011
1993 1996 2000 2004 2007 20110
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
czol ambucfur ambuczol hospicfur hospi
2013 16
Rec 2013 - Quid des MDR?
• MRSA• MDR Enterobacteriacae• Pseudomonas aeruginosa
• VRE• …
2013 17
Rec 2013 - Quid des MDR?
Consensus 2013
2013 18
2013/ MRSA
• Glycopeptides en prophylaxie– Consensus 2013
• Cluster of MRSA or MRSE• known MRSA colonisation (or at high risk)
AND who will have a skin incision• !!! vanco less effective on MSSA !!!
– czol+vanco!
• (Specific setting: community MRSA)
2013 19
2013/ MR(S)SA
• From controverse to growing evidence…• S aureus carriage eradication recommended
– Cardiac surgery– Orthopedic surgery– Spinal procedures
• ! Surveillance of R to mupi !• ? Timing? Duration?• ! operational considerations ! (BB)
Consensus 2013
2013 20
MRSA
• Screening vs high risk conditions – Pts/units
• Eradication• + Vancomycine
2013 21
VRE
• Enteroccoccus uncovered by conventional prophylaxis (rare exceptions)
• VRE to be considered in special settings (Li TX, …)
2013 22
Enterobacteriaceae
2013 23
Gram neg / PUBMED
• MDR / prophylaxis / surgery : 0• Carbapenemase / SSI / prophylaxis: 0• Carbapenemase / prophylaxis: 0• ESBL / prophylaxis: 47
– Surgery 12- 7 urology- 4 transplantation- 1 obesity (pharmaco ertapenem)
2013 24
MDR carriage / exposition to antibiotics
• Abundant literature – overlaps between:
– ESBL– UTI– Neutropenic patients– Quinolone use
2013 25
Urology / ciproR
• Urology• Transrectal prostate biopsy• E coli : first causative (75-
90%)• Haute prévalence esbl et
ciproR
• E coli ciproR 17%!!!• Quid proph quinolones?
Qi et al J Urol 2013: 2026
Williamson et al, CID, 2013:267
2013 26
Urology / customized prophylaxis
• FQ vs [ctri or genta or sxt or cefpodox]• Reduction infection / ctrl histor
• by screening and adapted prophylaxis• Reduction infection
Taylor J Urol 2012: 1275
Duplessis et al Urology 2012: 556-563
2013 27
Urology / cipro + amikacin
Kehinde J Urol 2013; 189: 911
Historic contrl : ciproIntervention: cipro+amika
2013 28
ESBL / epidemiology / liver Tx
• Independant risk factors – fecal carriage ESBL– Previous infection with ESBL– Previous Blactam– Previous SBP (quinolones!)
• Need for targeted prophylaxis
Bert , Transplant infect disease, 2013:0: 1-6
2013 29
ESBL / epidemiology / liver Tx
Bert , Transplant infect disease, 2013: 1-6
2002 20100
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
ESBL+ carriageESBL+ infection
%pts
2013 30
Colonisation / Clinical impact
• ICU~7 % infections caused by ESBL+– Among carriers
• 10% first infection and 27% second infection caused by ESBL+
Razazi Int Care Med 2012; 38:1769-1778
2013 31
ESBL / prophylaxis
2013 32
Antibioprophylaxis
• new recommendations Bratzler DW et al
Am J Health-Sys Pharm
Vol 70, feb1, 2013
previous:
Clin Infect Dis, 1994; 18: 422-427
2013 33
Rec 2013
• Transplanted pts (liver, lungs):– Include coverage for any potential pathogen
(isolated < donor / receiver)
• Colo-rectal– czol+ metro– Or ctri+metro (if high R cef1/2)
• [or ertapenem!!]
Consensus 2013
Quid Gram neg MDRO?
2013 35
Quid Gram neg/MDR?
• Consider customising– Urology (trans rectal biopsy)– Local SSI epidemiology
• Screening!(rectal)• Screening high risk• Customize to screening results• Customize to high risk (ex
uro!)
2013 36
Operational considerations
• Preoperative clinical path• Customize vs systematic
screening (lab costs!)
2013 37
Operational considerations
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Evolution nombre de frottis BMR par mois et unité
mois
No
mb
re
Your opinion?