aquatic risk assessment of the ely copper...
TRANSCRIPT
Aquatic Risk Assessment of the Ely Copper Mine
Nicholas Dove, Meghan Arpino, Kelsey Mcauliff, Jordan Monahan, Walt Auten, Nikola Pejovic
Executive Summary
The extraction, metal processing, and waste disposal stages in an ore mining
operation can increase the availability of heavy metals leading to acid mine drainage
(AMD) into sediment, soil, groundwater, and downstream surface water. AMD is a
process in which sulfuric acid is created and metals such as copper, aluminum,
cadmium, and zinc are mobilized when metal sulfides are in the presence of oxygen
and water (US EPA). The mobilization of these metals from the mine tailing waste
increases their bioavailability. Heavy metals and acidic discharge readily accessible
for ecosystem uptake can become a threat to streams, ecosystems, and human
health. The Ely Copper Mine, in Vershire, Vermont has contributed both heavy metal
contamination, specifically copper, and AMD to its downstream river system.
Although impacts to humans are fairly benign, there are many impacts to aquatic
organisms such as macroinvertebrates and trout species (Seal et al., 2010). Biotic
and abiotic remediation techniques have the potential to reduce the bioavailability
of these heavy metals lower pH discharge, and mitigate the stress these pollutants
are imposing on the stream system near the Ely Copper Mine (US EPA). We will
investigate techniques such as phytoextraction and chemical remediation, for their
potential to remediate Ely Copper Mine and the surrounding watershed.
Problem Statement
Runoff from the Ely Copper Mine’s tailings contain heavy metals and toxins
that have negative impacts on aquatic ecosystems, specifically macroinvertebrate
and fish populations (Seal et al., 2010). Therefore, we aim to assess the impacts of
the Ely Copper Mine and discuss the associated risks for aquatic
organisms. Additionally, we aim to discuss possible remediation techniques that
will facilitate the future success of the site’s many aquatic systems
Justification
Several metallic elements including copper are essential for plants and other
forms of life (Srivastava and Gupta, 1996). However, in large quantities, copper can
become toxic to organisms and have ecosystem-wide detrimental effects through
food web interactions and bioaccumulation (Dixon and Sprague, 2002). Fish can be
directly and indirectly harmed by both pH and aquatic copper concentrations in the
long and short term (Soldo and Behra, 2000). Copper can cause direct harm by
accumulating in the gills and flesh of the fish; in high enough concentrations there
can be acute toxicity resulting in death (MacRae et al., 1999). In lower
concentrations, the fish become more tolerant of higher copper concentrations
resulting in a magnification of copper concentrations flowing up the trophic
pyramid as predation occurs; combined with the increased mortality of rate of
juveniles could magnify the collapse of fish populations and community structure
(Soldo, 2000; Sloman, 2003). Ambient pH is also an important stressor of both
brook trout and blacknose dace; low environmental pH results in a significantly
higher mortality rate of cold-water riverine fish species (van Sickle et al., 1996).
Both species of fish could be indirectly affected by the persistence of a low
environmental pH and high copper concentrations. High amounts of environmental
stress in the riverine ecosystem could cause collapsing trophic cascade from the
bottom-up; the stressors in question will, over time, change the community
structure by eliminating sensitive species (Soldo, 2000). Even singular pollutants
can have devastating effects on fish populations, but stressors have been shown to
have synergistic effects on fish, meaning stressor levels considered to be safe will
have measurable, negative effects on fish (Power, 1997).
The deleterious effects of copper are especially evident in copper mining
operations, where excess copper can cause Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) (Utgikar et al.,
2000). AMD causes devastating effects in aquatic ecosystems including reducing
diversity and biomass of aquatic organisms (Kelly, 1988). It has been estimated that
17,000km of streams within the US are contaminated by AMD (Herlihy et al., 1987).
Copper ore is mostly made up of a class of compounds called sulfide minerals which
are in a class of minerals that are commonly associated with mining. Some forms of
copper sulfides include: Chalcocite (Cu2S), Bornite (Cu5FeS4) and Covellite (CuS).
These compounds are intentionally broken down in the refining process, resulting
in pure elemental copper. When the sulfur that was bound to the copper is removed,
it creates the by-product sulfur dioxide gas, which is then intentionally reacted with
water and oxygen to create sulfuric acid. Sulfuric acid is also produced when mine
wastes containing sulfide minerals are exposed to oxygen and water. In turn,
sulfuric acid contributes to the acidity of water bodies surrounding a mining site,
like the Ely Mine, through AMD. The following reactions show the breakdown of
Chalcocite, one of the most prevalent forms of copper ore, to elemental copper and
sulfuric acid that occurs in AMD (Gray et al., 1997):
2Cu2S + 3O2 → 2Cu2O + 2SO2 (1)
Cu2S + 2Cu2O → 6Cu + SO2 (2) 2 SO2 + 2 H2O + O2 → 2 H2SO2 (secondary RxN)
(Figure)
The Ely Copper Mine in Vershire, VT was in operation from 1821-1905 (Figure
1). In 2001, The Ely Copper Mine Superfund site was placed on the US
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) National Priorities List due to on site acid
mine drainage and contamination from mine wastes (Seal et al., 2010). To be
placed on the National Priorities List the Ely Copper Mine achieved a high numerical
ranking within the Environmental Protection Agency’s Hazards Ranking System
(HRS). The HRS evaluates a site based on the likelihood that the site has/will
released a hazardous substance, characteristics of the substance, and
surrounding/impacted ecological and human communities.
Heavy metal and AMD contamination have major implications for the aquatic
community downstream of the mine (Figure 2). Such contamination and acidity
could reduce overall aquatic biodiversity and anthropogenically important fish
populations. Therefore, it is essential to assess and quantify the specific risks posed
to the aquatic ecosystem around the Ely Mine.
Purpose
The purpose of this project is to assess the environmental risks associated with the
Ely Copper Mine and propose potential remediation plans.
Objectives
1. Find the current state of chemical contamination of the mine site and adjacent areas (Al, Co, Cu, Fe, pH, ect.).
2. Research species in the surrounding water bodies (Ely Brook, Schoolhouse Brook, Ompompanoosuc River) that may be negatively impacted by the contamination.
3. Assess current remediation efforts and propose potential future techniques for remediation.
Methods
Using a variety of sources from EPA reports to scientific articles, we
researched acid mine drainage, The Ely Copper Mine, and mining remediation. We
used the search engines Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Academic Search
Premier. Much of the information specific to the Ely Copper Mine came from
reports by the US EPA and third party researchers. We contacted Ed Hathaway, the
remedial project manager for the Ely Mine, and Pam Harting Barrat, the community
involvement coordinator for the Ely Copper Mine to answer questions about the
current status of the Ely Copper Mine. However, we did not hear back from either of
them.
To identify chemical or abiotic remediation techniques that would be
appropriate at the Ely Mine we reviewed the literature for popular techniques. Once
a technique was chosen, we assessed the benefits and costs that could be associated
with using that specific technique at the Ely mine site. In addition, research was
done on what biotic remediation technique would be appropriate for the Ely Mine
site. The plants, resources, and challenges associated with phytoextraction were
researched to assess the risks and benefits of using phytoextraction at the Ely
Copper Mine.
Results Current State:
Currently, the Ely Copper Mine has the potential to pose threats to organisms
living in the water bodies that surround the contaminated area. For this reason, the
mine was placed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (US EPA)
National Priorities List in 2001 (Seal et al., 2010). The National Priorities List helps
the US EPA to determine which sites warrant further investigation. Being placed on
the National Priorities List is a preliminary step in the Superfund cleanup process.
Once the site has been cleaned so that it no longer poses a threat to human and
environmental health, the site will be taken off the list. Cleanup of the Ely Copper
Mine is still in the planning phase, and thus, the timeline for it coming off the
National Priorities List is quite long.
Metal and acid contamination will continue to persist in soils and streams
around the Ely Copper Mine if no remediation efforts are undertaken. Both of these
stressors will continue to cause environmental degradation; perhaps the most
severe impact will be the loss of biotic diversity and abundance in aquatic systems
(Chiras, 2006). The data collected for biotic assessments conducted by the USGS
shows that the loss of biotic diversity and abundance in the aquatic systems
surrounding the Ely Copper Mine has occurred. The USGS 2010 Aquatic Assessment
report indicated that invertebrate abundance and invertebrate species richness
have declined downstream of the Ely Copper Mine (Figure 3). Cold-water fish
species such as trout and blacknose dace, which are found in riverine ecosystems
adjacent and downstream from the Ely mine, are of special concern because of their
ecological and human-use importance (Seal et al., 2010). Both the brook trout and
the blacknose dace are sensitive to aquatic copper concentrations and acid mine
drainage. In sampling for the USGS 2010 Aquatic Assessment report, it was
determined that the concentrations of Copper in Brook trout exceeded the EPA’s
Critical Body Residue (CBR) value of 2.4 micrograms per gram wet weight at one out
of three downstream sampling location. The concentrations of copper in Blacknose
Dace exceeded the same CBR value at four out of eight downstream sampling
locations (Figure 4) (Seal et al., 2010). CBR refers to the concentration of a chemical
that has bioaccumulated in an aquatic organism that is associated with some level of
toxicity such as mortality or reproduction (Barron et al., 1997). CBR values have
been considered accurate for chemicals that organisms are exposed to through the
water; however, the values for sediment and soil exposure pathways are still being
determined (Barron et al., 1997).
Runoff from the mine is contributing to heavy metal contamination and
highly acidic waters in local streams and surface waters such as the Ely Brook, Ely
Brook Tributaries, Schoolhouse Brook, and the Ompompanoosuc River. The Aquatic
Assessment of the Ely Copper mine found many elements had concentration were
greater than Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC) standards at different
intervals throughout the contaminated area (Table 1 ) (Seal et al., 2010).
Concentration above the AWGC indicate that aquatic species will be stressed in
many of these waters. Even though Ely Brook only contributes 7% of the flow to the
Schoolhouse Brook, it is obvious that Ely Brook’s contribution is impacting the pH of
the water in Schoolhouse Brook as well as introducing heavy metal contaminants
(Seal et al., 2010).
Metal or
pH
Upstream
Background
On-site Ely
Brook
Downstream of the mine Chronic
AWQC for
Aquatic Life
Schoolhouse
Brook 1
Schoolhouse
Brook 2
Ompompan-
oosuc River
Al 730 34,000 1400 700 930 87
Cd 0.02 17 0.051 0.29 <.02 1.1
Co 0.05 630 11 6.2 0.24 3.06
Cu 2 15,000 300 170 0.7 11.8
Fe 700 71,000 1700 800 360 1000
Mn 59 3,600 110 55 38 80.3
Ni 0.83 140 3.6 2 0.65 52
Pb 0.82 3 1.1 0.65 0.5 3.2
Zn 20 2,300 46 27 10 106
Lowest
pH 6.55 3 6.2 6.87 6.34 6.5-9
*Metal Concentrations = ug/L
Table 1 . Al, Co, Fe, and Mn were found in concentrations above the Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC) both on site and in Schoolhouse Brook. Concentrations in red indicate exceedance of EPA criteria. Remediation Technique 1:
Plants take up metals from the soil and incorporate the metals into their
tissue. The rate of metal uptake can vary from one species to the next. Plants also
have varying sensitivity to metal concentrations; a concentration that may be toxic
to one plant may be tolerated, or even necessary for another plant. Plants that are
tolerant of high concentrations of metal(s) are called metallophytes. Plants that
accumulate high amounts of contaminants (not limited to metals) are called
hyperaccumulators.
Phytoextraction is a restoration technique that uses plants that are both
hyperaccumulators and metallophytes to target a specific contaminant.
Phytoextraction is an effective technique that could be used to mitigate the harmful
effects of copper at, and surrounding, the Ely Copper Mine site. The success of
phytoextraction process depends on biomass production and metal concentration in
plant shoots (Raskin et al., 1994). Researchers have determined corn to be a
valuable crop in the phytoextraction process, specifically Zea mays L, because it has
a relatively large biomass. it is also capable of accumulating and tolerating high
levels of heavy metals in their tissue (Ebbs et al., 1997). One challenge associated
with phytoextraction is determining what to do with the plants once they have
extracted the metal. While an expensive process, the plants can be sent to labs
where the metals can be extracted and then reused or disposed of in a safe
manner. Another issue is the threat of metals entering the food chain due to
consumption of the plants by wildlife. However, when done in a responsible
manner in which the stalks of the plants are removed and kept from being
consumed, phytoextraction has proven to be an effective measure with little
negative effects to the ecosystem in which it is carried out.
During or after the phytoextraction has occurred, the area may be
manipulated reach a desired future condition in terms of species composition and
structure. A potential technique that we propose in order to reach a pre-mine state
is to revegetate affected areas with native plant species. These native species may
not be tolerant of copper, so they be inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi. A study in
China found that the presence of mycorrhizal fungi, attached to roots of plants,
inhibit the uptake of copper and other present metals (Chen et al., 2007). If the
results are consistent, this fungi would protect the roots of copper intolerant species;
the fungi also aided in phosphorus uptake, which is vital to the growth of plants.
These plantings could be established among plantings of metallophytes, as the
mycorrhizal fungi that will inhibit copper uptake by non-metallophytes.
Remediation Technique 2:
One of the more commonly used techniques for copper remediation in mine
wastewaters is chemical precipitation. Hydroxides or carbonates can be used to
precipitate available copper from the water column under appropriate high pH
conditions. The resulting precipitate complex is insoluble and not bioavailable to the
surrounding environment. This process can be inexpensive as alkaline products can
be utilized to achieve the desired pH. However, there are some disadvantages to
using a chemical precipitation technique.
Disadvantages include the large volume of sludge that forms after
precipitation. Though there is a large amount of sludge, it must be removed
physically. Physical removal does not solve the problem of what to do with the
precipitate; it must either be disposed of like conventional mining wastes, or further
processed into elemental metals. Secondly the alkaline materials will only
precipitate labile copper within the water column, however a significant portion of
the copper is insoluble and will not be precipitated. This insoluble copper will
remain in the system despite precipitation efforts. Finally, the copper within the
stream network would be permanently lost during this process and could not be
utilized afterward (Jordanov et al., 2007).
One type of system used for chemical precipitation in streams and rivers is a
doser. Image 1 is of a medium sized doser located along a tributary that runs into
the North Branch Potomac River. Studies have found that using dosers in tributaries
of the North Branch Potomac River. The doser releases set amounts of an alkaline
material, such as hydrated lime, pebble quicklime, and limestone.
Image 1. Doser along the Lostland Run that feeds into the North Branch Potomac
River.
Aquafix systems is a company that designs dosers for acid mine drainage
systems. Aquafix provides estimated costs of running dosers for 10 year intervals on
their website. For ten years, running an Aquafix system can cost anywhere in the
range of $128,000-175,500 total (Jenkins, 2012). Costs can vary depending on the
type of alkaline material that is used.
These systems work well when a specific stream is being targeted for
remediation, such as the Schoolhouse Brook. Some other benefits are that the
systems can be heated and used during the winter, are suitable for more rugged
terrain, and require little monitoring or maintenance (Jenkins, 2012). However, it is
important to determine whether or not the economic costs of installing an Aquafix
system are feasible for the Ely Copper Mine. In addition, using alkaline materials
that are mined from another location may mean that the negative impacts of mining
are being shifted from one location to another instead of being solved. Small-scale
reducing and alkalinity producing systems have been found to be effective at
removing metals and increasing the pH at site suffering from AMD on a smaller scale,
such as the Ely Copper Mine (Trumm & Watts, 2009). Field trials of a small scale
chemical precipitation system could be appropriate for raising the pH of the Ely and
Schoolhouse Brooks, since the effects of AMD are not as apparents further
downstream in the Ompompanoosuc River.
Conclusion
If the Ely Copper Mine were to employ a chemical precipitation scheme for
their copper laden waste discharge flowing into the Ely Brook and other local
tributaries, a significant amount of copper would remain within the immediate
ecosystem as sludge. While the remaining copper would be insoluble, the acid mine
drainage that is also an issue at the Ely Copper Mine, has the potential to mobilize
the insoluble copper over time if the precipitate sludge is not removed. While
chemical precipitation may be a useful form of remediation, it is not a technique that
can singularly achieve a satisfactory remediated state. An ideal solution for the Ely
Brook may include a combination of chemical precipitation with a biotic
remediation technique in order to achieve efficient and successful remediation
efforts.
Phytoextraction may be most suitable directly at the Ely Copper Mine site if plants
that are able to stand high heavy metal concentrations and a pH as low as 3.5 are
used. However, it may be difficult to find vegetation that would survive in the
conditions created by the Ely Copper Mine tailings and is naturally found in the
ecosystem that the Ely Mine is located. Using a combination of phytoextraction and a
doser system may be the most effective acid mine remediation technique for Ely
Copper Mine , the Schoolhouse Brook and the Ely Brook. Constructing an alkaline
doser system on only the Schoolhouse Brook would minimize costs. Actively
pursuing remediation techniques may improve the quality of the aquatic systems
within the Ely Copper Mine area so that the area can be removed from the list of
Superfund Sites.
Literature Cited
Barron, M., Anderson, M., Lipton, J., & Dixon, D. (1997). Evaluation of critical body residue QSARs for predicting organic chemical toxicity to aquatic organisms. SAR QSAR Environ Res, 6(1-2).
B.D. Chen, Y.-G. Zhu, J. Duan, X.Y. Xiao, S.E. Smith. 2007. Effects of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae on growth and metal uptake by four plant species in copper mine tailings. Environmental Pollution. Volume 147. Issue 2.
Chen, B. D., Zhu, Y. G., Duan, J., Xiao, X. Y., & Smith, S. E. (2007). Effects of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae on growth and metal uptake by four plant species in copper mine tailings. Environmental Pollution, 147(2), 374-380. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.04.027
Chiras, D. D. (2006). Environmental science (7th ed.). Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett.
Ebbs, S. D., Lasat, M. M., Brady, D. J., Cornish, J., Gordon, R. and Kochian, L.V.: 1997, ‘Phytoextraction of cadmium and zinc from a contaminated soil’, J. Environ. Qual. 26, 1424–1430.
Gray, N.F. (1997). Environmental impact and remediation of acid mine drainage: a management problem. Environmental Geology, 30(1), 62-71
Herlihy, A. T., Mills, A. L., Hornberger, G. M., & Bruckner, A. E. (1987). The importance of sediment sulfate reduction to the sulfate budget of an impoundment receiving acid mine drainage. Water Resour. Res., 23(2), 287-292. doi: 10.1029/WR023i002p00287
Kelly, M. (1988). Mining and the freshwater environment. Durham.
Jenkins, M. (2005). Aquafix: How it works. 2012, from http://www.aquafix.com/works.htm
Jordanov, S. H., Maletii, M., Dimitrov, A., Slavkov, D., & Paunovii, P. (2007). Waste
waters from copper ores mining/flotation in ‘Bucbim’ mine: characterization and remediation. Desalination, 213, 65-71.
MacRae, R. K., Smith, D. E., Swoboda-Coiberg, N., Meyer, J. S., & Bergman, H. L. (1999). Copper Binding Affinity of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) Gills: Implications for Assessing Bioavailable Metal. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18(6), 1180-1189.
MacRae, R. K., Smith, D. E., Swoboda-Colberg, N., Meyer, J. S., & Bergman, H. L. (1999). Copper binding affinity of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) gills: Implications for assessing bioavailable metal. Environmental Toxicology, 18(9), 1180–1189.
Mine Vershire Vermont. United State Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved February 17, 2012
Nobis Engineering Inc. (2011). Remedial Investigation Executive Summary, Ely Copper
Power, M. (1997). Assessing the effects of environmental stressors on fish populations. Aquatic toxicology., 39(2), 151.
Raskin, I., Kumar, P. B. N. A., Dushenkov, V. and Salt, D. E.: 1994, ‘Bioconcentration of
heavy metals by plants’, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 5, 285–290. Seal, Robert R., Kiah G. Richard, Nadine M. Paitak, John M. Besser, James F. Coles,
Jane M. Hammarstrom, Denise M. Argue, Denise M. Levitan, Jeffrey R. Deacon, and Christopher G. Ingersoll. Aquatic Assessment of the Ely Copper Mine Superfund Site, Vershire Vermont. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5084. 2010. Web. 16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.epa.gov/region1/superfund/sites/ely/473837.pdf>.
Sickle, J. V., Baker, J. P., Simonin, H. A., Baldigo, B. P., Kretser, W. A., & Sharpe, W. E.
(1996). Episodic Acidification of Small Streams in the Northeastern United States: Fish Mortality in Field Bioassays. Ecological Applications, 6(2), 408-421
Soldo, Diana, and Renata Behra. "Long-term Effects of Copper on the Structure of
Freshwater Periphyton Communities and Their Tolerance to Copper, Zinc, Nickel and Silver." Aquatic Toxicology 47.3-4 (2000): 181-89. Science Direct. Elsevier, 2 Dec. 1999. Web. 17 Feb. 2012. <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166445X9900020X>.
Sloman, K. A. (2003). Effects of trace metals on salmonid fish: The role of social
hierarchies. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 104(3-4), 326–345. Srivastava P.C., U.C. Gupta Trace Elements in Crop Production
Trumm, D., & Watts, M. (2009). Results of small-scale passive system trials to treat acid mine drainage, West Coast Region, South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 53(23), 227237.
United States. Environmental Protection Agency. The Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual. Environmental Protection Agency, Nov. 1992. Web. 26 Apr. 2012.
United States. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Division of
Health Assessment and Consultation. 2003. Web. 20 Feb. 2012. Utgikar, V., Chen, B. Y., Tabak, H. H., Bishop, D. F., & Govind, R. (2000).
Treatment of acid mine drainage: I. Equilibrium biosorption of zinc and copper on non-viable activated sludge. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 46(1), 19-28.
Figures
Figure 1: Site location of the Ely Copper Mine in Vershire, Vermont (Seal et al., 2010).
Figure 2: Nobis Inc. map delineating surface water contamination (red line), site waste areas (tan), impaired sediment (pink), and stream location (blue line) (Nobis Engineering Inc., 2011).
Figure 3: Invertebrate abundance (graph A) and richness (graph B) in Ely Brook. Horizontal axis indicates river meters, with 1,080 m being a reference site above the mine. (Seal et al., 2010)
Figure 4: Copper concentration in micrograms per liter in the surface waters of Ely Brook Tributaries. The number above the error bar indicates number of samples taken at each tributary location. The red line indicates the EPA’s Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC) standard for Copper (Seal et al., 2010).
Figure : USGS figure. The dashed line represents the critical body residue value for salmonoids (2.4 ug/g wet weight). Each dot represents a single fish sample for Brook trout, and a composite sample for Blacknose Dace. Horizontal axis represents river meters (Seal et al., 2010).