ardmore shipping corporation 2014ardmoreshipping.investorroom.com/download/asc... · this...
TRANSCRIPT
Modern Fleet of Eco-design and Eco-mod built at high quality Korean and Japanese shipyards with upgrades to improve fuel efficiency and commercial capability
2
Disclaimer
This presentation contains certain statements that may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of applicable U.S. federal securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that
address activities, events or developments that Ardmore Shipping Corporation (“Ardmore” or the “Company”)
expects, projects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, statements
about: future operating or financial results; global and regional economic conditions and trends; pending vessel
acquisitions or possible upgrades to vessels; the Company’s business strategy and expected capital spending or
operating expenses; competition in the tanker industry; shipping market trends; the Company’s financial condition
and liquidity, including ability to obtain financing in the future to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions and other
general corporate activities; the Company’s share repurchase program; ability to enter into fixed-rate charters after
the current charters expire and the Company’s ability to earn income in the spot market; expectations of the
availability of vessels to purchase and the time it may take to construct new vessels and vessels’ useful lives are
forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that its expectations stated in this presentation are
based on reasonable assumptions, actual results may differ from those projected in the forward-looking
statements.
Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, the risk factors
described in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), including the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014. This presentation is for
information purposes only and does not constitute an offer to buy or sell securities of the Company. For more
complete information about the Company, the information in this presentation should be read together with the
Company 's filings with the SEC which may be accessed on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.
Modern Fleet of Eco-design and Eco-mod built at high quality Korean and Japanese shipyards with upgrades to improve fuel efficiency and commercial capability
3
Earnings Release – Fourth Quarter & Full Year 2015
Performance and Recent Activity
Product and Chemical Tanker Markets
Fleet Update
Financial Results
Summary
Appendix
Agenda
Modern Fleet of Eco-design and Eco-mod built at high quality Korean and Japanese shipyards with upgrades to improve fuel efficiency and commercial capability
4
Highlights
Modern Fleet of Eco-design and Eco-mod built at high quality Korean and Japanese shipyards with upgrades to improve fuel efficiency and commercial capability
5
Performance and Recent Market Activity
Reported EBITDA of $17.1 million and net income of $5.4 million, equating
to $0.21 per share for the quarter
Delivered strong spot MR performance: $18,508 per day for 4Q15 and
$21,548 per day for the 12 months ended Dec 31, 2015
Maintained tight control of operating costs and overhead expenses,
sustaining a meaningful cost advantage
Generated record earnings of $1.23 per share for the 12 months ended
Dec 31, 2015 with an average of 20 vessels in operation
Took delivery of the remaining two vessels in our newbuilding program in
4Q15: 10 product / chemical tankers delivered 2015 bringing the fleet to 24
Agreed the terms of sale for the Ardmore Calypso and Ardmore Capella:
en bloc sale price of $38.5 million, resulting in a net gain on delivery
Completed a refinancing of $344 million of debt, reducing our interest
expense by ~$2 million and improving surplus cashflow by ~$6 million in
2016
Declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 / share, which brings the total
dividend declared for 2015 to $0.64 / share. Annualized run rate under new
dividend policy is $0.88 / share
Highlights
6
High Quality Fleet
1. Agreed sale of the Ardmore Calypso and Ardmore Capella, expected to deliver to buyer in 2Q162. Average age of fleet as at Jan 27th, 2016
Vessel Name Type Dwt Tonnes IMO Built Country Flag SpecificationArdmore Seavaliant Product/Chemical 49,998 2/3 Feb-13 Korea MI Eco-designArdmore Seaventure Product/Chemical 49,998 2/3 Jun-13 Korea MI Eco-designArdmore Seavantage Product/Chemical 49,997 2/3 Jan-14 Korea MI Eco-designArdmore Seavanguard Product/Chemical 49,998 2/3 Feb-14 Korea MI Eco-designArdmore Sealion Product/Chemical 49,999 2/3 May-15 Korea MI Eco-designArdmore Seafox Product/Chemical 49,999 2/3 Jun-15 Korea MI Eco-designArdmore Seawolf Product/Chemical 49,999 2/3 Aug-15 Korea MI Eco-designArdmore Seahawk Product/Chemical 49,999 2/3 Nov-15 Korea MI Eco-designArdmore Endeavour Product/Chemical 49,997 2/3 Jul-13 Korea MI Eco-designArdmore Seafarer Product/Chemical 45,744 3 Aug-04 Japan MI Eco-modArdmore Seatrader Product 47,141 — Dec-02 Japan MI Eco-modArdmore Seamaster Product/Chemical 45,840 3 Sep-04 Japan MI Eco-modArdmore Seamariner Product 45,726 — Oct-06 Japan MI Eco-modArdmore Sealeader Product 47,463 — Aug-08 Japan MI Eco-modArdmore Sealifter Product 47,472 — Jul-08 Japan MI Eco-modArdmore Dauntless Product/Chemical 37,764 2 Feb-15 Korea MI Eco-designArdmore Defender Product/Chemical 37,791 2 Feb-15 Korea MI Eco-designArdmore Centurion Product/Chemical 29,006 2 Nov-05 Korea MI Eco-modArdmore Cherokee Product/Chemical 25,215 2 Jan-15 Japan MI Eco-designArdmore Cheyenne Product/Chemical 25,217 2 Mar-15 Japan MI Eco-designArdmore Chinook Product/Chemical 25,217 2 Jul-15 Japan MI Eco-designArdmore Chippewa Product/Chemical 25,217 2 Nov-15 Japan MI Eco-designArdmore Calypso(1) Product/Chemical 17,589 2 Jan-10 Korea MI Eco-modArdmore Capella(1) Product/Chemical 17,567 2 Jan-10 Korea MI Eco-mod
Average Age (Yrs)(2): 4.6
Modern Fleet of Eco-design and Eco-mod built at high quality Korean and Japanese shipyards with upgrades to improve fuel efficiency and commercial capability
7
Product and Chemical Tanker Market
8
Product Tanker Market
Average MR Triangulation Rates(1)
Product Tanker Orderbook and Fleet Development(4)
Product tanker rates eased in 4Q15 but still strong:
o Spot & Pool TCE averaged $18,508 in 4Q15 down from a very
strong $23,974 in 3Q15
o Primarily driven by refinery maintenance in USG and Asia reducing
cargo volumes
• Seaborne product trade increased by 1.3 million bpd to 22 million bpd
in 2015 (~6% YoY increase), while tonne mile demand grew by ~7%
YoY(4)
EIA data shows US Gulf Coast (PADD 3) exports of finished
petroleum products averaged ~2.3 million bpd from Jan to Nov 2015,
a 7% increase YoY(3)
US Gulf refineries currently operating at 83.5% utilization(2) due to:
o Scheduled maintenance (turnarounds)
o Power outage at Exxon's 344kbd Beaumont refinery on Jan 21st
Orderbook at ~9.5% of the fleet which is the lowest level since 2001:
o 146 MR’s delivered and 20 MR’s scrapped in 2015
o Est. 99 MR deliveries and net fleet growth of ~4% in 2016(5)
o Orderbook may be <5% of the fleet by year end 2016(6)
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
$20,000
$22,000
$24,000
$26,000 Trailing 12 Mth. Average Rates
1. Source: HRP - Trailing 12 month average of TC11/TC4 and TC2/TC14 triangulation rates as at December 31st, 20152. Source: EIA Weekly Inputs & Utilization report for the week ending January 22nd, 20163. Source: EIA Finished Petroleum Product Export Data4. Source: Clarksons Shipping Intelligence Network 5. Based on management estimates6. Assumes no new orders placed in 2016
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
OB
as
% F
leet
Mill
ion
DW
T
9
Product Tanker Demand Outlook
Seaborne Volume of Oil Products Traded(2)Estimate of 2016 Seaborne Imports / Exports(1)
1. Source: Clarkson's Shipping Intelligence Network, forecast for 2016 according to Clarkson’s SIN data2. Source: Seaborne volume of Oil Products sourced from Clarkson's Shipping Intelligence Network, forecast for 2016 according to Clarkson’s SIN data3. Source: IEA Medium Term Market Report 2015 and management estimates
Global Refinery Capacity Growth(3)
94.0
95.0
96.0
97.0
98.0
99.0
100.0
101.0
102.0
2015 2016e 2017e 2018e
mb
/d
+1.6mbd
+1.2mbd
+1.5mbd
12.2
22.8
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
e
MM
bp
d
Import Export NetImports as % Total Trade
Exports as % Total Trade
Middle East 1.2 2.7 1.5 5.3% 11.8%
North America 1.8 3.3 1.5 7.9% 14.5%
China 0.5 0.6 0.1 2.2% 2.6%
Asia (ex China) 8.1 5.7 -2.4 35.5% 25.0%
Europe 7.1 5.7 -1.4 31.1% 25.0%
Latin America 1.9 0.6 -1.3 8.3% 2.6%
Africa 1.3 0.4 -0.9 5.7% 1.8%
FSU n/a 3.1 n/a n/a 13.6%
Other 0.9 0.7 -0.2 3.9% 3.1%
Total Trade MMbpd 22.8 22.8 100% 100%
CAGR +4%
~1.6 million bpd of new refining capacity expected to come on
stream in 2016(3):
o United States +300kbd (primarily PADD3)
o China +490kbd / Other Asia +330kbd / Middle East +296kbd
Increasing diesel exports from China driving trade
Refinery margins remain strong, particularly for gasoline,
resulting in higher outputs worldwide
Comments
10
Chemical Tanker Market
25k Dwt / 37k Dwt Chemical Tanker TCE $/day(1)
Chemical Tanker Orderbook and Fleet Development (2)
1. TCE $/day based on internal chemical tanker voyage data2. Orderbook for coated IMO2 with average tank size <3000m3 and stainless steel ships above 10,000 Dwt3. Based on comparison of Chemical Tanker “Eco-Mod” rates FY2015 vs FY20144. Based on management estimates5. Based on management estimates and assumes no new orders placed in 20166. Source: Richardson Lawrie Associates, Chemical Carrier World No. 40. Calculation based on the growth in the combined exports of the US and Middle East from 2014 to 2015
Chemical tanker charter rates were strong in 2015, evidenced by
ASC rate performance up 18% year-on-year(3)
The chemical tanker market continues to improve:
o Continued expansion of petrochemical plants in US and Middle
East leading to increased exports of commodity chemicals (+6%
YoY)(6)
o Imports of chemicals into China remain strong despite slowdown in
GDP growth, in particular those used in light industrial / textile
manufacturing
o Strong start to 2016 with Veg Oil / Biodiesel volumes at historical
highs
Simpler, coated chemical tankers such as those in ASC fleet are
benefiting from strong product tanker market:
o Continuing to engage in regional CPP trade to a greater degree
o ASC chemical fleet spending 50% of time in CPP trade, 25% in veg
oils and 25% in commodity chemicals
o As chemical market strengthens further, these ships can swing
back into more chemical business
Fleet growth expected to be relatively moderate with:
o Orderbook at ~11% of the fleet
o Est. 80 deliveries (~2 mln Dwt), resulting in net fleet growth of ~5%
in 2016(4)
o Orderbook expected to be <5% of the fleet by year end 2016(5),
assuming no new orders placed
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
TCE
$/d
ay
CHEM-25s CHEM-37s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
OB
as
% F
leet
Mill
ion
DW
T
Modern Fleet of Eco-design and Eco-mod built at high quality Korean and Japanese shipyards with upgrades to improve fuel efficiency and commercial capability
11
Fleet Update and 1Q16 Outlook
12
Chartering Profile
Revenue Day Estimates 1Q16(1)Fleet Employment Profile
Vessel Employment TC Expiry
Ardmore Seavantage Time Charter Jan-17
Ardmore Seavanguard Time Charter Feb-17
Ardmore Seafarer Time Charter Feb-16
Ardmore Cheyenne Time Charter Mar-16
Ardmore Chinook Time Charter May-16
Ardmore Chippewa Time Charter Sep-16
Ardmore Calypso Time Charter Apr-16
Ardmore Capella Time Charter Apr-16
Ardmore Seavaliant Spot n/a
Ardmore Seaventure Spot n/a
Ardmore Endeavour Spot n/a
Ardmore Sealifter Spot n/a
Ardmore Sealeader Spot n/a
Ardmore Seatrader Spot n/a
Ardmore Seamaster Spot n/a
Ardmore Seamariner Spot n/a
Ardmore Centurion Spot n/a
Ardmore Sealion Pool n/a
Ardmore Seafox Pool n/a
Ardmore Seawolf Pool n/a
Ardmore Seahawk Pool n/a
Ardmore Dauntless Pool n/a
Ardmore Defender Pool n/a
Ardmore Cherokee Pool n/a
29%
71%
1Q 2016 E
31%
69%
FY 2015
634
466
273
153182
60
273
120
MR Eco-design MR Eco-mod Prod/Chem Eco-design Prod/Chem Eco-mod
Spot / Pool TC Days
1. Includes estimated drydock days for 1Q16
4,280
7,071
8,221
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
FY14 1Q15 ACT 2Q15 ACT 3Q15 ACT 4Q15 ACT FY15 ACT FY16 EST
Rev
enu
e D
ays
13
Fleet Update
Revenue Days Growth From New Deliveries(1)Fleet Update
+16% (Y-o-Y) 10 product / chemical tankers delivered in 2015 contributing to
earnings and cash flow:
o Ardmore Sealion: 49,999 Dwt - SPP Shipbuilding, Korea
o Ardmore Seafox: 49,999 Dwt - SPP Shipbuilding, Korea
o Ardmore Seawolf: 49,999 Dwt - SPP Shipbuilding, Korea
o Ardmore Seahawk: 49,999 Dwt - SPP Shipbuilding, Korea
o Ardmore Dauntless: 37,764 Dwt - Hyundai Mipo, Korea
o Ardmore Defender: 37,791 Dwt - Hyundai Mipo, Korea
o Ardmore Cherokee: 25,215 Dwt - Fukuoka, Japan
o Ardmore Cheyenne: 25,217 Dwt - Fukuoka, Japan
o Ardmore Chinook: 25,217 Dwt - Fukuoka, Japan
o Ardmore Chippewa: 25,217 Dwt - Fukuoka, Japan
Four scheduled drydockings in 2016:
o Ardmore Seamariner expected to enter drydock in 1Q16
o Others later in year, timing dependent on positioning
Continued growth in revenue days forecast for 2016: 16%
increase in 2016 vs. 2015
1. Revenue Days based on managements estimates. FY16 estimates included the impact of sale of Ardmore Calypso and Ardmore Capella
Modern Fleet of Eco-design and Eco-mod built at high quality Korean and Japanese shipyards with upgrades to improve fuel efficiency and commercial capability
14
Financial
Modern Fleet of Eco-design and Eco-mod built at high quality Korean and Japanese shipyards with upgrades to improve fuel efficiency and commercial capability
15
Solid Financial Performance
1. EBITDA is a non-GAAP measures, a reconciliation of this measure is included in Appendix of this presentation 2. Definitions: Time Charter Equivalent (“TCE”) daily rate is the gross charter rate or gross pool rate, as appropriate, per revenue day plus Communication Victualing and Entertainment Income (“CVE”). For vessels employed on voyage
charters, TCE is the net rate after deducting voyage costs incurred by commercial managers.3. Fleet operating costs per day are routine operating expenses and comprise crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils and communication costs. They do not include additional costs related to upgrading or
enhancement of the vessels that are not capitalized. 4. Technical management fees per day are fees paid to third-party technical managers
INCOME STATEMENT DATA Three months ended Twelve months ended
US$ millions, unless otherwise stated Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Results
Revenue 41.8 22.3 157.88 67.33
EBITDA(1) 17.1 8.0 70.58 22.70
Net profit 5.4 1.9 31.95 1.66
Earnings per share ($/share) 0.21 0.07 1.23 0.07
OTHER OPERATING DATA
Average Number of Vessels 23.3 14.0 19.8 12.1
Fleet time charter equivalent per day ($/day)(2) 16,967 15,327 18,309 14,393
Fleet operating costs per day ($/day)(3) 6,133 6,500 5,976 6,197
Technical management fees per day ($/day)(4) 370 353 357 359
Upgrades / enhancements expensed in period ($) 240,654 191,331 915,677 586,446
14,393
15,913
14,793
-
11,404
18,309 19,149
20,223
17,507
13,417
AVG. FLEET TCE MR ECO-DES MR ECO-MOD PROD/CHEM ECO-DES PROD/CHEM ECO-MOD
FY 2014 FY 2015
16
Charter Rates Increased Substantially YoY
1. Time Charter Equivalent (“TCE”) daily rate is the gross charter rate or gross pool rate, as appropriate, per revenue day plus Communication Victualing and Entertainment Income (“CVE). For vessels employed on voyage charters, TCE is the net rate after deducting voyage costs incurred by commercial managers
2. Calculations based on existing cost structure and assume (a) a fully-delivered fleet of 24 vessels, (b) utilization of 99.45% and (c) 26.1 mln shares. Assumes no change in tax rate, cost of debt or share count
For every $1,000/day increase in rates, EPS increases by $0.34 cents(2)
Time Charter Equivalent ($ / day)(1)
+27% YoY
+20% YoY
+37% YoY
+18% YoY
Low Financial Leverage and every $1M increase in vessel values = $0.92 in NAV / share(2)
17
Strong Balance Sheet
1. Includes impact of netting of deferred finance fees of $8.6 mln in 2015 ($8.5 mln in 2014)2. 24 ships x $1 million = $24 million / 26.1 million shares = $0.92 / share; assumes no change in share count3. Debt = gross debt of $423.6 mln4. Net Debt = gross debt – cash
BALANCE SHEET DATA As at
US$ millions, unless otherwise stated Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
Cash 40.1 59.9
Receivables, Inventories and Other Assets 38.6 12.3
Vessels, Instalment Payments & Drydock 699.4 490.0
Total Assets 778.2 562.2
Payables and Accruals 15.6 10.1
Debt & Capital Lease Obligations(1) 415.0 224.9
Equity 347.6 327.2
Total Liabilities and Equity 778.2 562.2
Debt / (Debt + Equity)(3) 54.9% 41.6%
Net Debt / (Net Debt + Equity)(4) 52.5% 34.7%
$423.6
$699.4 $1.3 $9.4 $9.4 $9.4
Vessel Assets @ 4Q15 Gross Debt @ 4Q15 (1) 1Q 2016 2Q 2016 3Q 2016 4Q 2016
Debt Repayments
18
Conservative Capital Structure
Book value of vessel assets ~$700 mln and gross debt of ~$424 mln as at Dec 31, 2015(1)
Low corporate leverage: ~55% as at Dec 31, 2015, with significant balance sheet cash
Completed a refinancing of $344 mln of debt in January 2016, reducing our interest expense by ~$2 mln and improving surplus
cashflow by ~$6 mln in 2016
Additional incremental commitment of ~$20 mln provided by ABN AMRO and DVB Bank to fund future acquisitions
All debt is amortizing at ~$38 mln per year
Debt Profile(2)
1. Gross Debt excludes impact of netting of deferred finance fees as required under US GAAP ($423.6 mln - $8.6 mln = $415 mln)2. Proforma debt repayment profile based on 1Q16 debt refinancing
Modern Fleet of Eco-design and Eco-mod built at high quality Korean and Japanese shipyards with upgrades to improve fuel efficiency and commercial capability
19
Summary
Modern Fleet of Eco-design and Eco-mod built at high quality Korean and Japanese shipyards with upgrades to improve fuel efficiency and commercial capability
20
Summary
Reported strong financial results: net income of $5.4 million and EPS of $0.21 for the fourth quarter and net
income of $32 million and EPS of $1.23 for the full year
Near-term outlook remains positive, anticipating a solid charter market in 2016 driven by refinery expansion and
increased output, underpinned by continuation of oil market dynamics (volatility and congestion)
Strong secular demand growth continues as worldwide refinery expansions and complexity of trading activity
drives tonne mile demand, almost independent of underlying oil consumption growth (6% vs 1.4% over the last
seven years)
MR orderbook now at lowest point in 15 years and set to decline by year-end to around 5% without additional
ordering
Maintaining our flexible chartering strategy between spot and time charters to maximize earnings
Ardmore is well positioned to take advantage of continued strong rates - every $1,000 increase in charter rates
across the delivered fleet equates to $0.34 in EPS and $0.20 in dividend(1)
Declaring a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 / share, which brings the total dividend for 2015 to $0.64 / share,
reflecting both a strong market and a highly efficient operation. Annualized run rate under new dividend policy
is $0.88 / share
1. Calculations based on a full year at our existing cost structure and assumes (a) fleet of 24 vessels, (b) utilization of 99.45% and (c) 26.1 mln shares. Assumes no change in tax rate, cost of debt or share count.
Modern Fleet of Eco-design and Eco-mod built at high quality Korean and Japanese shipyards with upgrades to improve fuel efficiency and commercial capability
21
Appendix
22
Non-GAAP Measures
1. EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. This non-GAAP measure is presented in this press release as the Company believes that it provides investors with a means of evaluating and understanding how Ardmore’s management evaluates operating performance. This non-GAAP measure should not be considered in isolation from, as substitutes for, or superior to financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In addition, this non-GAAP measure does not have standardized meanings, and are therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.
NON-GAAP MEASURES Three months ended Twelve months ended
expressed in US$, unless otherwise stated Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014
EBITDA
Net profit / (loss) 5,365,550 1,861,883 31,954,965 1,660,474
Interest income (4,883) (3,067) (15,571) (16,444)
Interest expense and finance costs 4,337,015 1,172,531 12,282,704 4,119,283
Income tax 36,172 9,641 79,860 46,749
Depreciation 6,905,001 4,349,854 24,157,022 14,854,885
Amortization of deferred dry dock expenditure 503,175 564,013 2,120,974 2,031,100
EBITDA 17,142,030 7,954,855 70,579,954 22,696,047