Account Jobs Shop Events Awards Webinars White Papers Videos Advertise

Email Sign me up!

Get Avionics Weekly Eletter

A member of the Aviation Today Network Join us on:

Search AdvancedSearch

Subscribe

Digital Edition

Change Address

Thursday, April 12, 2012

GPS Backup: Is eLoran the Answer?by Callan James

Recent headlines about possible threats to the GPS network is bringing new

life to the discussion about the vulnerability and potential backups to the

ubiquitous system. Despite the defeat of the LightSquared broadband

proposal, the threat of GPS interruption, intentional or otherwise, remains a

reality for the aviation industry, experts say.

According to researchers in the U.K., using its Sentinel GPS monitor network, between 50 and 450

jamming incidents were detected every day over a six month period last year. The Department of

Homeland Security (DHS) in the coming years plans a similar monitoring scheme across the United

States, called Patriot Watch. Unquestionably, such continuing investigations can only be an endless

cat-and-mouse game between adversaries, during which time experts anticipate civil GPS jamming will

continue to escalate in intensity, coupled with decreasing availability and integrity for users, while

underscoring the increasingly urgent need for an unjammable GPS backup for aviation and all other

critical national needs for positioning and timing.

This has brought about the recent Federal Register request for public comment on the FAA (/search

/?query=FAA) plan to reduce the size of the national VOR network — while retaining DME — in readiness

for NextGen’s Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) plan, and as a skeleton backup to GPS and Wide

Area Augmentation System (WAAS), should jamming render them unusable. Under the plan, most ILS

installations would be retained as backups for GPS Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) for the

same reason. But reducing VOR numbers down to FAA (/search/?query=FAA) ’s Minimum Operational

Network (MON) has the unfortunate effect of raising the VOR’s nationwide reception “floor” to above

5,000 feet, due to line of sight limitations. Losing GPS at night while cruising at 3,000 feet sounds

challenging

Experts say eLoran, an enhanced version of the Loran-C long-range, ground-based navigation system,

could provide a backup to GPS from the ground up and the essential timing signals for the nation’s

critical infrastructure. ELoran was not included in FAA’s plan. (The U.S. Coast Guard terminated the

transmission of all U.S. Loran-C signals in 2010.)

“Today, eLoran is the only system that can fully back up GPS, and all other GNSS systems planned or in

use in other countries,” said UrsaNav President and CEO Charles Schue. UrsaNav, a diversified

technology company based in Chesapeake, Va., has assembled what could probably be described as

one of the world’s leading centers of excellence in Loran-C and eLoran.

“What’s more, it’s becoming clearer and clearer that GPS interference, whether inadvertent or

deliberate, will continue to grow, thereby causing GNSS to become less and less valuable. In that

arena, eLoran provides two benefits. First, it can prevent the interruption or loss of vital satellite

services. But second, and less widely appreciated, it can vastly reduce the incentive to jam GNSS

systems when it becomes known that they have constant and essentially unjammable backups,” Schue

said.

ELoran retains the powerful long range — and unjammable — 90-110 KHz low frequency signals of its

predecessor, plus their solid coverage from the surface to well above 60,000 feet, and out to over 1,000

miles, it is otherwise totally different.

TweetTweet 2 0ShareShare 0

-T (javascript:void(0);) / T (javascript:void(0);) / +T (javascript:void(0);) | Comment(s) (#comments)

10LikeLike

DecisionBriefs Military Commercial Business & General Aviation Unmanned Systems Air Traffic Management

In-Flight Connectivity Insider

Avionics Magazine :: GPS Backup: Is eLoran the Answer? http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/commercial/GPS-Backup-I...

1 of 2 2/24/14, 10:57 AM

From a pilot’s point of view, Loran-C suffered from two serious drawbacks — precipitation static and the

transmitter station’s inconvenient configurations in “chains” or groups of three or four stations to

provide regional navigation coverage. P-static was eliminated by H-field antennas, such as semi-flush

ADF loop antennas. ELoran dispenses with the old “chain” concept. Every eLoran transmitter would be

totally independent of all others, with the system operating on an “all in view” basis, exactly like GPS,

where incoming signals are selected for their best fix geometry.

But while the old Loran-C concept provided fix accuracies of less than a quarter mile, differential eLoran

has met and exceeded International Maritime Organization standards of 8 to 10 meters for harbor

entrance applications, with that performance attributed to its much higher signal stability of its

predecessor. Similarly, its +/- 100 nanosecond accuracy at the receiver antenna underscores its unique

timing capability, making it one of just three methods of achieving the US national Stratum 1 standard,

with the others being GPS and certain laboratory atomic clocks. One consequence of this is that a

U.S.-wide eLoran network could provide continuous RNP 0.3 performance throughout the CONUS.

“It is now generally recognized that advanced low frequency signals, of which eLoran is one example,

can provide alternative timing — either as a stand alone service or as a component of an existing

positioning, navigation and timing service,” said Don Jewell, retired U.S. Air Force and GPS subject

matter expert. Jewell has been involved in GPS since its inception; he has served as a commander at

Schriever Air Force Base, Colo. — the “home” of GPS — before retiring as deputy chief scientist at Air

Force Space Command.

“High power, virtually jam and spoof proof low-frequency signals operate independently of GPS and

provide a Stratum-1 Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) reference. The recognition of the criticality of

time to many aspects of our overall critical infrastructure beyond simply GPS has hopefully finally led to

an evaluation of the benefits of a nationwide low-frequency timing system,” Jewell added.

Airborne eLoran operating procedure concepts would also be very different. Many see it as a totally

autonomous sensor on a chip, running in parallel and cross checking with the GPS — possibly even

embedded in that unit — but with the FMS automatically switching to eLoran should tracking divergence

due to GPS jamming be indicated. When the FMS determines that the GPS is no longer being jammed,

it switches back to satellite navigation. And there would be no pilot eLoran controls or displays, other

than perhaps a flight deck annunciator indicating a GPS sensor outage.

Rockwell Collins Names Olsen VP ofBusiness and Regional Systems1 comment • 2 months ago

AvatarBrad — Correction, Craig Olsen will workfor Kent Statler.

Airbus A350 XWB Makes Doha Debut1 comment • 19 days ago

AvatarSirajudeen B Mohamed — Qalbie MarhabaA350 to the land of sacrifice

U.S. Congress Reverses Cancellation ofUH-72A Lakotas1 comment • 25 days ago

AvatarAndre Leonard — Finally some goodnews..

Rotor & Wing Magazine :: Looking for aLift: Hoists 1011 comment • 20 days ago

AvatarDick Johnson — My Commentary: "TheRest Of The Story" MSPAC AW139Botched Hoisting Training-blade back …

ALSO ON AVIATION TODAY

0 Comments Aviation Today Logind

Sort by Best Share ⤤

Start the discussion…

WHAT'S THIS?

Subscribe✉ Add Disqus to your sited

Favorite ★

Avionics Magazine :: GPS Backup: Is eLoran the Answer? http://www.aviationtoday.com/av/commercial/GPS-Backup-I...

2 of 2 2/24/14, 10:57 AM