be final

25
Bioplastics Synthesis of polymeric films using waste banana peels Abhijit Mohapatra 60011100028 Hemant Sharma 600011100054 Shruti Prasad 60011100034

Upload: hemant-sharma

Post on 01-Jun-2015

222 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Be final

BioplasticsSynthesis of polymeric films

using waste banana peels

Abhijit Mohapatra 60011100028

Hemant Sharma 600011100054

Shruti Prasad 60011100034

Page 2: Be final

Why Banana Peels?

Page 3: Be final

Objective of the Project

The Objective of this project was to synthesize bio-polymeric

films from banana peels and identify the ideal combination of

parameters which would give the maximum tensile strength to

the sample.

The parameters considered were :

i. pH of the reaction mixture

ii. Residence time for hydrolysis of the reaction mixture

iii. Choice of plasticizer

Page 4: Be final

Procedure for Synthesis

Preparation of Banana Paste

Boiling Decant water Drying Grindin

g

Page 5: Be final

Production of Film

25gm Paste

Add 3ml HCl

Add 2ml Plasticize

r

Add NaOH Baking Polymeri

c film

Page 6: Be final

Reaction Mechanism

Starch consists of two different types of polymer chains:

1. Branched chained amylopectin

2. Linear Chained Amylose

Page 7: Be final

Hydrolysis

Amylose is a straight polymer, a desirable

polymer to make plastic

Amylopectin is branched polymer which

makes the plastic brittle

Acid Hydrolysis is done to break the branched

chains of amylopectin to aid plastic formation

Page 8: Be final

Addition of Plasticizer

The Plasticizer gets in between the

polymer chains and prevents them from

lining up in rows to form a crystalline

structure.

The Plasticizer increases flexibility, and

develops the plasticity of the product.

Page 9: Be final

Addition of NaOH

If hydrolysis time is prolonged,

amylose also gets hydrolysed

Hence, NaOH is added to neutralize

the Acid

Page 10: Be final

Phase wise Synthesis

Stage 1: pH and Residence time were varied keeping

plasticizer same. Best combination obtained by strength

test was used for Stage.

Stage 2: Based on the values of parameters obtained,

Fresh samples were prepared. This time Plasticizers were

changed. Plasticizers used were:

• Glycerine

• Sorbitol

• Polyethylene glycol (PEG)

Page 11: Be final

Trials Conducted

9 Experimental trials were conducted, out of this 3

were accepted for testing

Reasons for discarding samples:

• Perforations on the sample

• Incomplete baking

• Incorrect Concentration of reagents

Page 12: Be final

Procedure: Tensile Strength Test

Step 1: Visual inspection

Step 2: The approved sample is cut

into a 2cm by 4cm rectangular slice

Step 3: The samples are clamped such

that 60% of the sample is our testing

region

4cm Sample

20%

 

60%

20%

  2 cm  

Page 13: Be final

Step 4: After sample is clamped, weights are added in

Steps of 10gm with 20 seconds between each step.

Step 5: Final weight at which the sample tears is noted.

Step 6: Tensile strength is Calculated using:

Page 14: Be final

Tensile Strength Test Apparatus

Page 15: Be final

ObservationspH Residence Time

(Minutes)

Sample Weight (grams)

Acidic 5 1/04-8 341.41

  10 1/04-7 351.89

  15 3/04-2 200.94

  20 1/04-5 271.53

       

Basic 5 26/03-4 331.2

  10 3/04-4 160.9

  15 26/03-2 240.89

  20 26/03-1 131.15

       

Neutral 5 3/04-3 231.59

  10 1/04-3 331.50

  15 1/04-2 406.19

  20 1/04-1 301.69

Page 16: Be final

pH Sample Thickness (mm)

    1 2 3 4 5 Mean

Acidic 1/04-8 0.94 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.74 0.836

  1/04-7 0.66 0.62 0.6 0.64 0.62 0.628

  3/04-2 0.72 0.6 0.48 0.48 0.5 0.556

  1/04-5 0.5 0.52 0.54 0.56 0.42 0.508

               

Basic 26/03-4 0.62 0.6 0.68 0.7 0.62 0.644

  3/04-4 0.9 0.84 0.7 0.78 0.94 0.832

  26/03-2 0.66 0.66 0.7 0.7 0.84 0.712

  26/03-1 0.6 0.52 0.54 0.48 0.58 0.544

               

Neutral 3/04-3 0.6 0.64 0.74 0.68 0.78 0.688

  1/04-3 0.62 0.58 0.66 0.68 0.66 0.64

  1/04-2 0.6 0.52 0.54 0.66 0.58 0.58

  1/04-1 0.6 0.52 0.54 0.62 0.52 0.56

Page 17: Be final

Analysis

Page 18: Be final

4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 220

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

Tensile Strength Vs Residence Time (Combined Plot)

Acidic NeutralBasic

Residence Time (mins)

Ten

sile S

tren

gth

(M

Pa)

Stage 1

Page 19: Be final

4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 220

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Conversion Vs Residence Time (Combined)

Acidic BasicNeutral

Residence Time

% C

on

vers

ion

Page 20: Be final

Final Trial

pH Plasticiser Residence

Time

(Minutes)

Sample Weight

(grams)

Neutral Glycerine 15 16/04-2 456.2

Neutral Sorbitol 15 16/04-3 794.95

Neutral PEG 15 16/04-4 558.11

Plasticiz

er

Sample Thickness (mm)

    1 2 3 4 5 Mean

Glycerin

e

16/04-2 0.68 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.72 0.68

Sorbitol 16/04-3 0.48 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.516

PEG 16/04-4 1.1 0.94 0.82 0.8 0.7 0.872

Page 21: Be final

Stage 2

Glycerine

Sorbitol

PEG 400

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

Tensile Strength for Different Plasticizers

Tensile Strength for Dif-ferent Plasticisers Ten-sile Strength (N/mm^2)

Page 22: Be final

Properties Sorbitol Glycerine PEG

Brittleness Least Flexible Flexible structure Flexible structure

Tensile strength Highest

TS :26.06MPa

14.31MPa 16.14MPa

Glycerine

Sorbitol

PEG

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Conversion For Different Plasticizers

Conversion %

Page 23: Be final

Suggested PPS

Page 24: Be final

Future Scope

Exploring other Sources of Starch

Effect of varying concentrations of Reagents

Extensive Testing

Extraction of Starch from peels

Understanding the effect of Reagents on other

components of the peel

Page 25: Be final

Thank You