bordo credit market turmoil
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
1/45
Credit Market Turmoil, Monetary Policy and Business Cycles: an historical
view.
Michael D. BordoRutgers University and NBER
Joseph G. Haubrich1
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
1 The views expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank
of Cleveland or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. We thank Kent Cherny and Sagar
Shah for excellent research assistance, and David Wheelock for sharing data.
1
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
2/45
I. Introduction
Creditmarketdistressarisesinitsmorevirulentformonlyincertainmonetary
environments,andhasitsmostextremeeffectswhenitexacerbatesabusiness
cycledownturn. Policyquestionsaboutacentralbanksroleaslenderoflast
resortorregulatormustbeseeninthecontextofmonetarypolicy.
Therelativelyinfrequentnatureofmajorcreditdistresseventsmakesan
historicalapproachtotheseissuesparticularlyuseful.Usingacombinationof
historicalnarrativeandeconometrictechniques,weidentifymajorperiodsof
creditdistress1875to2007,examinetheextenttowhichcreditdistressarisesas
partofthetransmissionofmonetarypolicy,anddocumentthesubsequenteffect
onoutput.
Theseissues
involve
relationships
between
policy
rates
(monetary
aggregates)creditspreads,andGDPgrowth. Usingturningpointsdefinedby
theHardingPaganalgorithm,wecomparethetiming,duration,amplitudeand
comovementofcyclesinmoney,creditandoutput. Fortheperiodsincethe
1920s,thisismosteasilydonewithariskspreadbetweencorporateand
Treasurybonds,thediscountrate,andrealGDP. Thisallowsustopickoutand
compareperiodsoftightcreditthatresultfromtightmonetarypolicyandthose
thathaveamoreexogenouscause. Fortheperiodfrom1875to1920creditspreads
are
measured
by
differences
between
yields
on
different
rail
road
bonds,
andtheconditionsinthemoneymarketaremeasuredbycommercialpaper
yields. Wealsoexaminethepatternsforrealstockpricessincestockmarketcrashesalsocanactasanexacerbatingfactorincreditturmoil.
Literaturereview
Theeffectofcreditonthebroadereconomyhasbeenofconcerntoeconomists
sincetheearlydaysoftheprofession.Nineteenthcenturyauthorsoftenspokeof
discredit,atermKindleberger(2000)adoptsforthelaterphaseofafinancial
crises. Mitchell(1913)wasanearlyexpositorofthecreditchannelaswas
Hansen(1921),andJ. LaurenceLaughlin(1913)testifiedthattheorganization
creditismoreimportantthanthequestionofbanknotes.Disentanglingthe
impactofcreditsupplyfromchangesindemandaswellasfromthemyriad
2
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
3/45
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
4/45
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
5/45
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
6/45
althoughthereweresomefamousregionalbusts,eg.Californiainthe1890s.In
threeoftherecessionsassociatedwithpanics,BankofEnglandtighteningleadingto
suddenstopofcapitalinflowswaslikelythesourceoftheshock.Inaddition
monetarytighteningcontingentonthefearthatlegislationassociatedwiththeFree
Silvermovement(BlandAllisonAct of1878andtheShermanSilverPurchaseActof
1893)likelyledtothepanicof1893andthecurrency(andminorbanking)crisisof
1896(FriedmanandSchwartz1963,Gorton1987).AccordingtoCalomirisand
Hubbard(1989)citingSpragueandothers,creditcrunchesoccurredinthemajor
recessions.
ImportantEpisodes
1873.AseriousinternationalcrisiswithoriginsinarealestatebustinViennaand
BerlinwasintheU.S.associatedwithcorporatemalfeasanceinthedominantrailroadsector(BenmelechandBordo2008),astockmarketcrashandabanking
panicwithwidespreadbankingfailures.Thepanicendedwiththesuspensionofof
convertibilityofbankliabilitiesintocurrency.Theevidenceoffraudinrailroads
precipitatedasuddenstopincapitalinflowsfromEngland.Theresultantrecession
lasteduntil1879.Mishkin(1990)providesevidencethataqualityspreadbetween
MoodysBaacorporatebondrateandthelongtermTreasurybondratespikedafter
thebankingpanicandstockmarketcrash.Thisiscitedasevidenceforthepresence
ofdeclining
net
worth
and
asymmetric
information,
which
in
turn
increased
agency
costsandreducedbanklending.
1893.Aseriousbankingandstockmarketcrashinthesummerof1893wastriggered
bythepassageoftheShermanSilverPurchaseActwhichledtofearstheU.S.would
beforcedoffthegoldstandardandtocapitalflight.Inthecrisishundredsofbanks
failed.AttemptsbytheNewYorkClearingHousetoissueclearinghouseloan
certificatesdidnotstopthepanic.Itendedwiththesuspensionofconvertibility.As
inthecrisisof1873,CalomirisandHubbardciteevidenceofequilibriumcredit
rationing,eg.Stevens(1894)wholesaletransactions[are]usuallydoneoncredit.
[New]generalbusinesswasbeingdonealmostonacashbasispage141,and
Mishkin(1990)showsthequalityspreadpeakswiththecrisis.Thecontractionof
lendingbythebankingsystemasaresultofitstroublereduceditsroleinsolving
6
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
7/45
adverseselectionandagencyproblemsandclearlymadetheseproblemsworsein
thefinancialmarkets(page19).
1907.Thisseriousrecessionwasalsoaccompaniedbyabankingpanicandstock
marketcrash.ItmayhavebeentriggeredbyBankofEnglandtighteningin1906in
reactiontoagoldoutflowtotheU.S.tocoverinsuranceclaimsfromtheSan
Franciscoearthquake(OdellandWeidenmeir2004).IntheU.S.thecollapseofa
cornerofthecoppermarketinOctoberledtothefailureof8banks,followedbythe
failureoftheKnickerbockerTrustCompany.Thisledtoarunontheothertrust
companiesandthenageneralpanic.Theissueofclearinghouseloancertificates,the
transferoffundsfromtheTreasurytokeyNewYorkbanksandarescuebya
syndicateorganizedbyJ.P.Morganalleviatedthepressure,butthepaniconly
endedwiththesuspensionofconvertibility.Thepanicwasassociatedwithhundredsofbankfailures,asignificantdropinmoneysupplyandadeeprecession.
Asinotherpanicepisodes,CalomirisandHubbardcitecontemporaryevidencefora
creditcrunch.Persons(1920)discussesahaltinfurthercreditexpansionpage147;
Sprague(1910)Itwouldseem,then,pastbusinessdistressfromlackofcredit
facilitieswasdueatleasttothreeinfluences:therestrictionofcashpaymentsbythe
banksincreasedtherequirementsofborrowers;thesupplyofloanswasreducedby
amoderateamountofcontraction;andtheshiftingofloansinvolvedconsiderable
uncertaintyand
inconveniences
page
303.
Mishkin(1990),
as
in
the
previous
crisis
showsaspikeinthequalityspread.Accordingtohimthedeclineinthevaluation
offirms[inthestockmarketcrash]raisesadverseselectionandagencyproblemsfor
borrowingfirmsbecauseithasineffectloweredtheirnetworth.Theresulting
increasesinasymmetricinformationproblemsevenbeforetheOctoberbanking
panic,shouldraisethespreadbetweeninterestratesforhighandlowquality
borrowers.Theprocessofsevereasymmetricproblemsevenbeforethebanking
panicsuggeststhattheywerepotentiallyimportantfactorsincreatingasevere
businesscyclecontraction.pp2127.
1914.TheoutbreakofWorldWarIledtoamassivecapitaloutflowfromU.S.
financialmarketstothebelligerents.ThismassivesuddenstopthreatenedtheNew
Yorkstockmarket,thebankingsystemandU.S.goldreserves.TreasurySecretary
McAdooinvokedtheAldrichVreelandActtoissueemergencycurrencytoallaythe
7
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
8/45
bankingpanic,closedtheNYSEandpooledU.S.goldreserves.Thecrisiswas
largelyaverted.Thereisnonarrativeevidenceofacreditcrunch.
2.19181945
TheFederalReservewasestablishedin1914inparttosolvetheabsenceofalender
oflastresortinthecrisesofthepre1914NationalBankingera.Initsfirst25years
therewerethreeveryseverebusinesscycledownturns:192021,192933and1937
38.Allthreewereassociatedwithverytightmoney.The192933recessionhadfour
bankingpanicsproducingtheGreatContraction.Thestockmarketcrashedin1920,
1929,193032 and1937.AccordingtoWhite(2008)therewasarealestateboombust
inthe1920sandanotherin192933.Thereisconsiderableevidenceforcollapseof
banklending(acreditcrunch)in193033and193738.AccordingtoBernanke(1983)
boththenumerousbankfailuresthatoccurredandthecollapseinnetworthbroughtaboutbybankruptcies,fallingassetpricesanddeflation,increasedthecostofcredit
intermediationandreducedrealoutputoverandabovetheeffortsofadeclinein
moneysupplypositedbyFriedmanandSchwartz(1963).
192021.
TheFedtighteneddramaticallyraisingitsdiscountrateinlate1919torollback the
inflationthathadbuiltupduringWorldWarIandtorestoreeffectiveadherenceto
thegold
standard.
This
followed
asevere
but
brief
recession
(industrial
production
fell23%,wholesalepricesfell37%andunemploymentincreasedfrom4%to12%)
possiblybecauseFedactionswerenotanticipated(Bordo,ErcegandLevin2007).No
bankingcrisesoccurredbuttherewasastockmarketcrashaccordingtoMishkin
andWhite(2002).Alsothereisnonarrativeevidenceforacreditcrunch,the
transmission oftightmoneyoccurredthroughariseinrealinterestrates(Meltzer
2005p.118).
192933
TheFedtightenedbeginninginearly1928tostemthestockmarketboomwhich
beganin1926.ThistighteningledtoarecessioninAugust1929andastockmarket
crashinOctober.TheNewYorkFedinitiallyfollowedexpansionarypolicyto
preventamoneymarketpanicinOctober.Itthenstoppedeasingbytheendofthe
year.DespitedemandsfromNewYork,theFederalReserveBoardinWashington,
8
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
9/45
followingtherealbillsdoctrine,wasconcernedaboutrekindlingstockmarket
speculation.AseriesofbankingpanicsbeginninginOctober1930ensued.TheFed
didlittletooffsetthemhenceallowingtherecessiontobecomeadepression.
AccordingtoFriedmanandSchwartz(1963),thebankingpanicsreducedthemoney
stockbyathirdandledtosimilardeclinesinrealoutputandprices.Theprocess
wasaggravatedbydebtandassetpricedeflation.AccordingtoBernanke(1983)the
bankfailuresandthecollapseofnetworth(Mishkin1978)raisedthecostofcredit
intermediationseeninanincreaseinqualityspreads.Inaddition,Calomirisand
Mason(2003) andCalomirisandWilson(2004)identifytheshockstobanklending
(creditcrunch)usingrespectivelyapanelofbankdatabystatesandbyNewYork
Citynationalbanks.
193738RecoveryfromtheGreatContractionbeganwithRooseveltsBankingHolidayin
earlyMarch1933andTreasurygoldpurchases(Romer1992).Itwasslowed
somewhatbythesupplyshocksoftheNIRA(ColeandOhanian2004).Asecond
severerecessionin193738wasproducedbyamajorFedpolicyerror.Itdoubled
reserverequirementsin1936tosopupbanksexcessreserves.Thisledtoanother
collapseinmoneysupplyandareturntosevererecession.BothBernanke(1983)and
CalomirisandWilson(2004)seeevidenceforadeclineinthesupplyofbankloans
(acrunch)
in
response
to
deflation
and
declining
net
worth.
3.19451980
TheFedemergedfromWorldWarIIstillpeggingTreasurybondprices.Thispolicy
ledtohighinflationwhichendedwithtighteninginOctober1947(Romerand
Romer1989)thatledtoarecessionin1948.ThefamousFederalReserveTreasury
accordof1951restoredFedindependence.Thenext15yearswascharacterizedby
relativelystablemonetarypolicy(Meltzer2004).TheFedunderWilliamMcChesney
Martininthe1950sviewedpricestabilityasitsprimaryobjective.Onseveral
occasions,whenfacingincipientinflation,theFedtightened, precipitatinga
recession.
Inthepostwarperiodtherewerenobankingpanicsandnoseriousstock
marketcrashes.However,accordingtoWojinlower(1980,1982,1992),Credit
crunchesoccurredwhentheFedtightenedraisingshortterminterestrates.Asrates
9
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
10/45
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
11/45
requirements:apparentlyithadshiftedtoapolicybasedonthepricemechanism
ratherthancreditavailability.4(OwensandSchreft1993page26).YetonMay22,
ChairmanBurnswrotealettertobankersaskingthemtoallocatecreditthrough
nonpricerationinginsteadofraisingratesfurther(ibid).TheFedcontinuedto
tightenthrough1974byrepeatedhikesinthediscountratebutceasedpressuring
thebankswithnonpriceallocationtechniques(ibidpage28).
4.19802007
Inflationcontinuedunabatedthroughthe1970s.Debateswirlsoverthecausesof
theGreatInflation19651982.Someobserversattributeittotheaccommodationof
expansionaryfiscalpolicy,otherstothePhillipsCurvetradeoffandanunwilling
nessdrivenbypoliticalpressuretoraiseunemploymentattheexpenseof inflation
andotherstomeasurementerrorsinestimatingpotentialoutput(BordoandOrphanides2009).Finallyinthefaceofanexchangeratecrisisandgrowingpopular
discontent,PresidentCarterinOctober1979appointedPaulVolckerasChairmanof
theFederalReserve.MonetarypolicytightenedsignificantlyasVolckereffectively
targeted monetaryaggregatesinsteadofinterestrates,andproducedaseriesof
sizeablehikesinthefederalfundsrate.Howeverthetightmonetarystancewas
temporarilyabandonedinmid1980aseconomicactivitydeceleratedsharply.
InMarch1980attherequestoftheCarterAdministration,asasignaltothe
publicin
an
election
year
of
its
willingness
to
fight
inflation,
the
Fed
imposed
selectiveconsumercreditcontrols.Thecontrolsinvolveddirectrestrictionsonbank
loangrowth.TheFedprovidedbroadguidelinesforcreditallocationsuggestingfor
examplethatbanksavoidmakingunsecuredconsumerloans(OwensandSchreft
1993page30).Theprogramledtoamarkeddeclineinconsumercreditaslending
rateshitbindingusurylawceilings.Thisreducedpersonalconsumption,
contributing toaverysharpdeclineineconomicactivity.Thecontrolswereliftedin
July1980.
TheFederalReserveembarkedonanewroundofmonetarytighteninginlate
1980.Thefederalfundsrateroseto20percentinlateDecember,implyinganexpost
realrateofabout10percent(Bordo,ErcegandLevin2007).NewlyelectedPresident
ReaganssupportofVolckerspolicywassignificantingivingtheFederalReserve
4According to Owens and Schreft (1993) the 1973-74 episode was not a true credit crunch which they
define as non price credit rationing because bank lending rates were permitted to rise.
11
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
12/45
themandateitneededtokeepinterestrateselevatedforaprolongedperiod,and
providedsomeshieldfromgrowingoppositioninCongress(Feldstein1993).This
secondandmoredurableroundoftighteningsucceededinreducingtheinflation
ratefromabout10percentinearly1981toabout4percentin1983,butatthecostof
averysharpandveryprolongedrecession.Inthisepisodethereisnonarrative
evidenceofacreditcrunch.
Therecessionof199091wasprecededbyFedtighteningbeginningin
December1988(RomerandRomer1994).ItcoincidedwiththefirstGulfWar.There
wasnobankingcrisisbuttherewasastockmarketcrashinAugust1990.Therealso
wasnotarealestatebustalthoughrealhousepricesdeclined13%19891993.
AccordingtoBernankeandLown(1991)therewasacreditcrunchwhichtheydefine
asasignificantleftwardshiftinthesupplyofbankloansholdingconstantthesafe
realinterestrateandthequalityofpotentialborrowers.AccordingtothemacollapseinNewEnglandrealestatereducedtheirequitycapitalandforcedbanksto
scalebacktheirlending.Thisreducedaggregatedemandviathelendingchannel
(BernankeandBlinder1988)andcontributedtotherecession.
OwensandSchreft(1993),whodefineacreditcrunchasnonpricecredit
rationing,alsopositthattherewasacreditcrunchinthecommercialrealestate
market,asectorspecificcreditcrunchthatpreventedcommercialrealestate
developersandbusinessborrowersusingrealestateascollateralfromgettingcredit
atany
price
(page
50).
Therecessionof2001wasprecededbyamildtighteningofmonetarypolicy
(thefundsratewasraisedfrom41/2%inNovember1998to6%inMay),andthe
collapseofthetechboominthestockmarketinthespringof2001.Thereisno
narrativeevidenceofarealestatebustoracreditcrunch.
FinallytherecessionwhichbeganinDecember2007wasprecededbyFed
tighteningbeginninginJune2004following3yearsofexcessivelylowrates.The
lowpolicyratesaswellasaglobalsavingsgluthelpedfundahousingboomwhich
begandeflatingattheendof2006.Theensuinghousingbustinitiallycentered on
theU.S.subprimemortgagemarket inthespringof2007.Factorsbehindtheboom
inadditiontolowinterestrates includeU.S.governmentinitiativestoextendhome
ownership,changesinfinancialregulation,laxoversightandtherelaxingofprudent
standards(Bordo2008).
12
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
13/45
Thedefaultonsubprimemortgagesproducedspillovereffectsaroundtheworld
viathesecuritizedmortgagederivativesintowhichthesemortgageswerebundled,
tothebalancesheetsofinvestmentbanks,hedgefundsandconduitswhich
intermediatebetweenmortgageandotherassetbackedcommercialpaper andlong
termsecurities.Theuncertaintyaboutthevalueofthesecuritiescollateralizedby
thesemortgagesledtothefreezingoftheinterbanklendingmarketinAugust2007
andsubsequentlytoamassivecreditcrunch.Thecollapseincreditreflectedasevere
dropinassetpriceswhicherodednetworthandcollateralgreatlyincreasingagency
costs andqualityspreads.Inadditiontheweakeningofmajorbanksbalancesheets
hasimpairedtheirlending.Thishasbeengreatlyaggravatedbyamorethan50%
dropinstockprices.Despiteextensivecentralbankliquidityinjectionsandthe
creationofanumberoffacilitiesattheFedtorejuvenatethecreditmarkets,the
crunchstillprevails.ThecreditcrunchhasproducedaseriousrecessionintheU.S.whichhasspreadtotherestoftheworld.
III. EmpiricalMethodologyWithanaimofexaminingcyclesinmoney,creditandoutputsince1875,data
availabilityandconsistencybecomekeyissues. Forbusinesscycles,weusethe
NBERchronology(ataquarterlyfrequency). ForRealGrossNationalProduct(note
itisGNP,notGDP)weusethenumbersfromBalkeandGordon(1986),extended
viathe
NIPA
accounts.
Likewise
for
the
money
supply,
we
use
the
M2
numbers
fromBalkeandGordon,splicedandupdatewiththeM2numbersfromtheBoardof
Governors. Formanyotherseries,1919becomesanaturalbreakpoint.Forthe
interestrate(risk)spreadin1919andafter,weuseMoodysSeasonedBaaCorporate
BondYield(%p.a.)lessLongTermTreasuryComposite,Over10Years(%p.a.). For
theearlierperiod,weconstructadifferencebetweenaveragesofthehighyielding
andlowyieldingrailroadbondyieldstakenfromMaCaulay(1938)5. MaCaulayis
alsothesourceforearlyvaluesofcommercialpaper. Thediscountratesince1945is
theratefromtheBoardofGovernorsandpriortothatistherateattheFederal
ReserveBankofNewYork,fromBankingandMonetaryStatistics(1943). Thestock
priceindexfor18751917istheCowlesCommissionindex,itsleveladjustedto
5 For 1914 quarter 3, the markets were closed, and we entered a judgmental value of 1% for the spread. As
this was a time of turmoil in the markets, it is not an innocuous assumption.
13
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
14/45
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
15/45
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
16/45
Thesecondsetofregressionslooksathowmonetary,credit,andasset
cyclesaffectthebusinesscycle. Forexample,dorecessionsthatstartduringa
creditcrunchlookdifferentthanthosethatdont? EachNBERcontractionis
associatedwiththemoney,credit,orassetcyclephasethatitstartsin. The
amplitudeofthecontractionisthenregressedagainsttheamplitudeoftheother
cyclephases. Forexample,arecessionthatstartsinaperiodoftighteningcredit
andtighteningmonetarypolicyisassociatedwiththeamplitudesofthosetwo
contractionphases.
IV. EmpiricalResultsCyclecharacteristics
Inoursample,from1875:Ito2007:III,wehave27(NBER)recessions,counted
ascompletepeaktotroughepisodes.Tables2and3reportthemeanamplitudeanddurationofcyclesforthe1875:I1918:IVperiod,andtables4and5reportthe
amplitude and durations for 1919:I2007:IV, calculated for the peaktotrough
andtroughtopeak. Ifthebeginningquartersbelongtoacontractionthatstarted
before our sample, those are not counted. Likewise for an expansion that
continuesbeyondoursample.
Theaveragedurationofarecession(peaktoTrough)is15.4months,thatof
anexpansion39months. Becauseofdatalimitations,weseparatelylookattwo
subsamples,
from
1875:I
to
1918:IV
and
from
1919:I
to
2007:IV,
the
period
for
which we have Federal Reserve discount rate data. For the later period,
recessionshaveshortenedandexpansionslengthened. Fortheearlyperiod,the
averagedurationofa recession is6quarters (8.3 forexpansions).For the later
period,thedurationsare4.5forcontractions,17.7quartersforexpansions.
Creditshowsalongercycle. Fortheearliersample,ourmeasureofcredit
is the spreadbetweendifferent rail roadbonds. These show ameanpeakto
trough duration of 8.25 quarters, and a troughtopeak duration of nearly 10
quarters,aswellasshowingnoticeably longermaximumcycles. Alsonotethe
greater symmetry between expansions and contractions in the credit spread
series.Forconsistency,thePTofratesandspreadsshouldbecomparedtotheT
PofRGNP.For the latersample,using the spreadbetweenMoodys seasoned
Baacorporatebondyieldlessthe longtermtreasurycomposite,contractions,
orperiodsofgenerally falling spreads, lastanaverageof11.1quarters, longer
16
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
17/45
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
18/45
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
19/45
associate the amplitude of the NBER recession with the amplitude of that
monetary contraction (which will rarely have the same turning points or
duration). Tables10and11reporttheresultsforthe19thand20thcenturies. The
resultsarebroadlysimilar to those in theNBER focusedregressionofTables9
and10,buttherearesomedifferences. Thecoefficientontheriskspreadshows
up as positive in the 20th century. The stock index remains positive and
significant,exceptwheninteraction2isadded.
Both the historical narrative and the empirical results suggest that a
confluence of financial shocksin risk spreads, assets prices and money
supplywill exacerbate a contraction, or at least be associated with deeper
contractions. Acloser look that thedeeperrecessions inoursamplebears this
out, even though the correspondencebetween financial shocks and depth of
recession is not onetoone. Figures 2 and 3 provide scatterplots of recessionamplitude against the risk spread, shortterm rates,money supply, and stock
movements.
SincetheFirstWorldWar,fourrecessionareparticularlydeep(measured
aspercentchange inrealGNP frompeak to trough): thoseof1929,1945,1920,
and 1937. Thesewere at least triple the sizeof anyother contraction (with a
possible exception of the combined 19801981 drop). 1945 stands out as an
anomaly, but the other three stand out as having the three largest drops
percentagedrops
in
the
money
supply
and
stock
prices,
and
two
of
the
three
largest increases in the risk spread. Contemporary accounts of the 1920
contraction do not mention a credit crunch in line with the only moderate
increaseintheriskspreadinthatcontraction.
PriortotheFirstWorldWar,threecontractionsstandout,allovertwiceas
deepastheothers:1907,1893,and1913. Theconnectionswithfinancialshocks
areperhapsnot as striking as for the laterperiod,but still strong. The three
contractionshavetwoofthetopthreedeclines instockprices,andthetoptwo
changes inmoney andbond spread. Contemporary accounts noted a credit
crunchin1893despiteonlyasmallmovementintheriskspread.
An alternative approach is to sort on the size of movements in risk
spreads,money and stockprices, looking to see if largermovements in these
variables leads to larger recessions. SinceWorldWar I, four contractionshad
particularlylargeincreaseintheBaaspread,fourhadparticularlylargedropsin
19
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
20/45
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
21/45
the differencebetween the yield on Baabonds and longterm Treasuries has
movedup393basispoints,a larger increase that seen in the1929contraction,
and approaching the combine increase of 436 bp over both the Depression
contractions. ThepercentagedropininS&Pindexof44.5%issecondonlytothe
78% of theGreatContraction. Money supply,however, is adifferentmatter,
withanincreaseof15.2%inthecurrentperiod,thelargestincreaseofM2seenin
any contraction. This should not be particularly surprising, however. As
Friedman and Schwartz point out, prior to deposit insurancebanking panics
wouldcauseacollapse in themoneymultiplier,drivingM2down. Zarnowitz
(1992)showsthatbusinesscyclesdownturnswithpanicsaremuchmoresevere
thanothers. Todaybecauseofdeposit insuranceetc financialturmoildoesnot
lead topanicsandcollapses in themoneymultiplier,andcredit turmoil is less
likely to feed into the money supply. The credit disturbance thusbecomesrelatively more important, given that disturbances on the asset side of the
balancesheetnolongerhaveasstronganinfluenceonthemoneysupply.
21
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
22/45
References
PatrickK.AseaandS.BrockBlomberg(1998)LendingCycles,Journalof
Econometricsvol.83pp.89128.
NathanS.BalkeandRobertJ.Gordon,(1986)AppendixB:HistoricalData,The
AmericanBusinessCycle:continuityandchange,NBERStudiesinBusinessCycles,
UniversityofChicagoPress,Chicago.
RobertJ. BarroandJosF.Ursa,(2009)StockMarketCrashesand
Depressions,NBERworkingpaper14769.
AnneL.BeattyandAnneGron,(2001)Capital,Portfolio,andGrowth:Bank
BehaviorunderRiskBasedCapitalGuidelinesJournalofFinancialServices
Research,vol.20pp.531.
EphraimBenmelechandMichaelBordo(2008)TheFinancialCrisisof1873and
19thCenturyAmericanCorporateGovernanceHarvardUniversity(mimeo)
BenBernanke(1983)NonMonetaryEffectsoftheFinancialCrisisinthe
PropagationoftheGreatDepression.AmericanEconomicReviewLXXIII.pp217
76
BenBernanke
and
Alan
Blinder
(1988)
Credit,
Money,
and
Aggregate
Demand
AmericanEconomicReview PapersandProceedings78:43539
BenBernankeandMarkGertler,(1989) AgencyCosts,NetWorthandBusiness
Fluctuations,AmericanEconomicReview,vol.79,pp.1431.
BenBernanke,MarkGertlerandSimonGilchrist,(1996)TheFinancial
AcceleratorandtheFlighttoQuality,TheReviewofEconomicsandStatistics,vol.
78pp.115.
BenBernankeandCaraLown (1991)TheCreditCrunch.BrookingsPapers
on
EconomicActivity.2:1991.pp205239
BoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSystem,(1943)BankingandMonetary
Statistics,19141941,Washington,DC.
22
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
23/45
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
24/45
CharlesCalomirisandBerryWilson(2004).BankCapitalandPortfolio
Management:The1930sCapitalCrunchandtheScrambletoShedRisk.
JournalofBusiness.Vol77.No.3.pp421455.
CharlesT.CarlstromandTimS.Fuerst,(1997)AgencyCosts,netWorkand
BusinessFluctuations:acomputablegeneralequilibriumanalysisAmerican
EconomicReview,vol.87,pp.893910.
Claessens,Stijn,MAyhanKoseandMarcoE.Terrones,(2008)WhatHappens
duringRecessions,CrunchesandBusts? IMFworkingpaper,WP/08/274.
OttoEcksteinandAllenSinai(1986)TheMechanismsoftheBusinessCyclein
thePostwarEra.InRobertJ.Gordoned.TheAmericanBusinessCycle:Continuity
andChange.NationalBureauofEconomicResearchStudiesinBusinessCycles,
vol25.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress
M.Fazzari,R.GlennHubbard,andBruceC.Petersen,(1988), Financing
ConstraintsandCorporateInvestmentBrookingsPapersonEconomicActivity,
Vol.1988,No.1pp.141206
MiltonFriedmanandAnnaJ.Schwartz(1963)AMonetaryHistoryoftheUnited
States18671960.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.
SimonGilchrist,
Vladimir
Yankov,
and
Egon
Zakraj
sek,(2008)
Credit
Market
ShocksandEconomicFluctuations:EvidencefromCorporateBondandStock
Marketsworkingpaper.
GaryB.Gorton(1988)BankingPanicsandBusinessCycles?OxfordEconomic
Papers NewSeries40.pp751781.
Gorton,GaryB.,andPingHe,(2008)BankCreditCycles.
Harding,DonandAdrianPagan,SynchronizationofCycles,Journalof
Econometrics,vol.132,(2006)pp.5979.
_________and______,DissectingtheCycle:amethodologicalinvestigation
JournalofMonetaryEconomics,vol.49,(2002)pp.365381.
24
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
25/45
Haubrich,JosephG.andPaulWachtel,(1993)CapitalRequirementsandShifts
inCommercialBankPortfoliosEconomicReview,(FederalReserveBankof
Cleveland)vol.29,pp.215.
AlvinH.Hansen,(1927)BusinessCycleTheory,Boston,Ginn.
OwenLamont,(1997),CashFlowandInvestment:EvidencefromInternal
CapitalMarketsTheJournalofFinance,Vol.52,pp.83109
CaraLownandDonaldP.Morgan(2005)TheCreditCycleandtheBusiness
Cycle:newfindingsusingthesurveyofseniorloanofficers,JournalofMoney,
CreditandBankingvol.
FrederickR.Macaulay,(1938)SomeTheoreticalProblemsSuggestedbyThe
Movementsof
Inerest
Rates,
bond
Yields
and
Stock
Prices
in
the
United
States
since
1856,NBER.
AllanH.Meltzer(2003)AhistoryoftheFederalReserveVolume1,19131951.
Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.
FredericS.Mishkin(1978)TheHouseholdBalanceSheetandtheGreat
DepressionJournalofEconomicHistory38(December):91837.
FredericS.
Mishkin(
1990)
Asymmetric
Information
and
Financial
Crises:
A
HistoricalPerspectiveNBERWorkingPaperNo.3400.July
FredericS.MishkinandEugeneN.white(2002)U.S.StockMarketCrashesand
TheirAftermath;ImplicationsforMonetaryPolicy.NBERWorkingpaper
no.8992June.
WesleyClairMitchell,(1913),BusinessCycles,Univ.ofCaliforniaPress,Berkeley.
KerryOdellandMarcWeidenmeir(2004)RealShock,MonetaryAftershock:
the1906SanFranciscoEarthquakeandthePanicof1907Journalof
Economic
History52(December):757784.
RaymondE.OwensandStaceyL.Schreft,(1993)IdentifyingCreditCrunches.
FederalReserveBankofRichmondWorkingPaper932.
25
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
26/45
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
27/45
AlbertM.Wojnilower(1985) PrivateCreditDemand,SupplyandCrunches,
HowDifferentarethe1980s.AmericanEconomicReview.Vol75No.2May,pp
351356.
AlbertM.Wojnilower(1992) CreditCrunchesintheNewPalgraveDictionary
ofMoneyandFinance.London:MacMillan.
27
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
28/45
TABLE 1:Descriptive Data 1873-2008
NBERBusiness
Cycle Peak
BankingCrises
StockMarketCrash
RealEstateBust
TightMonetary
Policy
CreditCrunch
Comments
1 October
1873
September
1873
September
1873
no Bank of
Englandtightens
? International Financial
Crisis; real estate bustin Germany, Austria;
Railroad scandal stockmarket crisis andserious recession
focused on railroads.Panic ends withsuspension ofconvertibility.
2 March 1882 June 1884 February1884
no no yes1
Minor panicconsequent upon
failure of Grant andWard, attenuated byNY clearing house.
3 March 1887 no no no no no Minor recession
4 July 1890 November1890
November1890
no Bank ofEnglandtightens
no Baring crisis inLondon caused byArgentine defaults.Bank of England
tightening leads tosudden stop, minor
banking panicattenuated by NYclearing house.
5 January1893
May 1893 May 1893 no Silver risk yes1
Major U.S. bankingpanic related to fearsU.S. would be found
off gold standard afterpassage of ShermanSilver Purchase Act.
Panic ends with
suspension ofconvertibility.
6 December1895
October1896
2
no no Silver risk no Gorton(1987)identifies a banking
panic but Sprague andFriedman and
Schwartz (1963) donot. Silver risk inducedrun on U.S. Treasury
gold reservesstemmed by Belmont
MorganSyndicate(Friedman
and Schwartz)
7 June 1899 no no no no no Minor recession
8 September1902
no October1903
no no no Minor recession. Richman's panic
(Friedman andSchwartz p.151)
28
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
29/45
NBERBusiness
Cycle Peak
BankingCrises
StockMarketCrash
RealEstateBust
TightMonetary
Policy
CreditCrunch
Comments
9 May 1907 October1907
October1907
no Bank ofEnglandtightens
yes1
Major recession andbanking panic, rescue
by JPMorgan,
suspension ofconvertibility.
Contemporariesdiscuss credit
squeeze.
10 January1910
no no no no no Minor recession
11 January1913
August1914
(incipient)
August1914
(incipient)
no no no Outbreak of WorldWar I
12 August 1918 no Fall 1917 no no no Mild recession,Mishkin and
White(2002) attributestock market crisis torising interest rates
and controls on newissues.
13 January1920
no Fall 1920 no yes no Major recessioninduced by Fed tightmoney to roll backwartime inflation.
14 May 1923 no no no yes no Minor recession. Fedfollowed policy of
moderaterestraint(Friedman
and Schwartz 1963.p.287) to offset
incipient inflation.
15 October1926
no no no3
yes no Minor recession. Fedtakes "moderate
restrainingmeasures"(Friedmanand Schwartz 1963.
p.288)
16 August 1929 October1930 April
1931Sept/Oct
1931Jan/Feb
1933
October1929
yes4
yes yes5
Great contraction.Tight Fed policy 1928-
29 to stem stockmarket speculation for
Banking crises.Contraction in net
worth, debt deflation,bank capital crunch.
17 May 1937 no February1937 May
1940
no yes yes6
Major recession. Feddoubles reserve
requirements in 1936,Contraction in networth, bank capital
crunch.
18 February1945
no September1946
no no no End of World War II.Sharp decreases in
governmentexpenditures.
Adjustment from warto peace.
29
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
30/45
NBERBusiness
Cycle Peak
BankingCrises
StockMarketCrash
RealEstateBust
TightMonetary
Policy
CreditCrunch
Comments
19 November
1948
no no no yes no Fed tightens to offset
post war inflation.
20 July 1953 no no no yes yes8
Mild recession.
Moderate tightening
reflecting Fed concern
of inflation. Bond crisis
raises rates.
21 August 1957 no no no yes9
yes10
Significant recession
induced by Fed
tightening. Evidence
of credit rationing.
22 April 1960 no Spring
190211
no yes yes12
Mild recession
induced by Fed
tightening.Disintermediation as
market rates pierced
Regulation Q. ceilings
leads to reduced bank
lending.
August
- Sept
196613
"Credit crunch" of
1966 background of
Fed tightening
monetary policy end of
1965. Fed bank
regulators urged
restraint on bank
lending.Disintermediation
Regulation Q. ceilings
bound.
23 December
1969
no14
May 1970 no yes15
yes16
Mild recession. Fed
tightening and
jawboning by Fed and
government to restrain
lending.
Disintermediation as
market rates exceed
Regulation Q. ceilings.
24 November
1973
no17 November
197318
no yes yes19 Fed tightening. OPEC
shock. Significant
recession. Arthur
Burns May 1974 urges
banks to allocate
credit through non
price rationing.
30
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
31/45
NBERBusiness
Cycle Peak
BankingCrises
StockMarketCrash
RealEstateBust
TightMonetary
Policy
CreditCrunch
Comments
25 January
1980
no no no yes yes Significant Fed
tightening begins
October 1979 (Volcker
shock). March 1980Fed at Carter's
administration request
imposes selective
consumer credit
controls. Controls
lifted July 1980.
26 July 1981 no no no yes no Tight Fed policy
induces serious
recession.
27 July 1990 no August
1990
no25
yes26
yes27
Fed tightening. Gulf
war. Mild recession.Evidence of non price
credit rationing and a
capital crunch.
28 March 2001 no Spring
2001
no yes no Fed restraint leads to
mild recession, tech
bust
29 December
2007
September October28
yes29
yes30
yes Fed tightening
beginning in June
2004 may have
helped trigger a real
estate bust, Lehman
Brothers failure, creditcrunch, stock market
slide, and severe
recession.
Endnotes
1Calomiris and Hubbard(1989) Citing Sprague and others.
2Gorton(1987).
3Florida land bust, White(2008).
4White(2008).
5
Bernanke(1983), Calomiris and Mason(2003), Calomiris and Wilson(2004).6Bernanke(1983), Calomiris and Wilson(2004).
7Romer and Romer(1989) pick October 1947 as the start of Fed tightening.
8Wojnilower(1992) states that bank lending was impaired by the collapse in Treasury bond
prices.9Romer and Romer(1989) date tightening as beginning September 1955.
10Wojnilower(1980, 1982, 1992), Eckstein and Sinai(1985) discuss credit rationing as leading to
the 1957-58 recession.
31
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
32/45
11Real stock prices decline by 29% January 1966 to October 1966(Bordo, Dueker and Wheelock
2008).12
According to Wojnilower(1980, 1992), Fed tightening pushed T-bill rates above the Regulation
Q ceiling leading to disintermediation.13
Wojnilower(1980), Owens and Schreft(1993).14
Penn Central collapse in July 1970. The Fed averted a crisis by backstopping the money center
banks' support of the commercial paper market.15
Romer and Romer(1989) date Fed tightening as beginning in December 1968.16
Owens and Schreft(1993).17
Failures of Franklin National Bank October 1974 and Germany's Herstatt Bank June 1974.18
Romer and Romer(1989) date monetary tightening as beginning in April 1974.19
Owens and Schreft(1993).20
Real stock prices decline by 20%, November 1980 to July 1982(Bordo, Dueker and Wheelock
2008).21
Shiller(2005) figure 2.1 shows a 13% decline in real house prices 1979-1993.22
Owens and Schreft(1993).
23Failures of Continental Illinois and Penn Square banks in 1984. Also Savings and Loan crisis in
1984.24Owens and Schreft(1993).
25Shiller(2005) figure 2.1 shows a 13% decline in real house prices 1989-1993.
26Romer and Romer(1989) give December 1988 as the beginning of tight policy.
27Bernanke and Lown(1991) provide evidence of a capital crunch in New England. Bonds
reduced lending to replenish their capital to meet regulatory standard. Owens and
Schreft(1993) document non price credit rationing in the real estate sector.
28The Standard and Poor stock price index declined 55%. July 2007 to March 2009.
29The Case and Shiller real home price index declined 33% from December 2006 to October
2008.
30The Federal Funds rate increased from a trough in May 2004 at 1.00% to a peak of 5.26% in
July 2007.
Sources
Banking Crises: Bordo(1986), Friedman and Schwartz(1963), Gorton(1987).
Stock Market Crashes: Bordo(1985), Bordo, Dueker and Wheelock(2008), Friedman and
Schwartz(1963), Mishkin and White(2002), Sprague(1910)
Real Estate Busts: Shiller(2005), White(2008).
Tight Monetary Policy: Friedman and Schwartz(1963), Meltzer(2004), Romer and Romer(1989).
Credit Crunch: Bernanke(1985), Bernanke and Lown(1991), Calomiris and Hubbard(1987),
Calomiris and Mason(2003), Calomiris and Wilson(2004), Eckstein and Sinai(1985), Owens and
Schreft(1993), Wojnilower(1980, 1985, 1992).
32
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
33/45
Amplitude Peak-
Trough
P-T % Trough-peak T-P %
RGNP (NBER
cycles)
-11.13 -7.8% 36.37 34.1%
Rail Road Spread -0.28 0.27CP -2.63 2.51
M2 growth 10.4% 12.1%
Table 2: Cycle Amplitudes, 1875:1-1918:4, quarterly
Duration (Quarters) 19th Peak-Trough Trough-peak
RGNP (NBER cycles) mean 6
max 13min 3
8.3
125
Rail Road Spread mean 8.25max 18
min 2
9.89
36
2
CP mean 5.54max 11
min 3
6.75
14
3
M2 growth mean 7.45max 18
min 4
6.91
12
3
Table 3 Cycle durations, 1875:1-1918:4, quarterly
33
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
34/45
Amplitude Peak-Trough P-T % Trough-peak T-P %
RGNP (NBER
cycles)
-28.69 -5.9% 238.52 29.0%
Baa Spread -1.18 1.14
Discount Rate -2.18 2.18M2 growth -2.9% 3.1%
Table 4: Cycle Amplitudes, 1920:1 to 2007:4
Duration
20thPeak-Trough Trough-peak
RGNP
(NBER
cycles)
mean 4.5
max 14
min 2
17.7404
Baa Spread mean 11.1max 30
min 4
8.421
2
Discount
Rate
mean 8.8125
max 18
min 2
20.8
66
9
M2 growth mean 11max 65
min 3
6152
Table 5: Cycle Durations, 1920:1 to 2007:4
34
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
35/45
Baa Discount M2 (log dif) NBER
Baa SpreadconcordanceExpected concordance
Prob. Of independence
1 54.0%
48.8%
26%
40.3
50.5
0.5%
34.4%
45.5%
0.005%Discount Rate 1 38.1
49.50.4%
61.6
54.60.9%
M2 (log difference) 1 50.3
48.0
35.4%
NBER cycle 1
Table 6: Concordances, expected concordances, and probability of independence(regression method) for 20th century series: 1920:1 to 2007:4, quarterly, M2 is annual log
difference, using data from 1919:1 calculated from Balke-Gordon, spliced with Board of
Governors M2 data.Moody's Seasoned Baa Corporate Bond Yield (% p.a.) less Long-Term TreasuryComposite, Over 10 Years (% p.a.)
Discount Rate: Pre 1945, FRB NY rate, then BOG rate.
NBER Rail spread CP rate M2 (log dif)
NBER CycleconcordanceExpected concordance
Prob. Of independence
1 59.7%
50.1%
8.1%
63.6
51.0
1.3%
50.6%
49.8%
80.9%Railroad Spread 1 54.0
50.137.9%
50.0
50.084.3 %
Commercial Paper
rate
1 39.2
49.76.4%
M2 (log difference) 1
Real GNP 67.054.1%
0.000%
Table 7: same as above, for 19th
century data, 1875:1 to 1918:4 (quarterly).
35
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
36/45
Table 8 NBER 19 Recession Amplitude, 19th Century.Recession amplitude (Peak-trough Real GNP as a fraction of Peak RGNP) for NBERcontractions, regressed against the Peak-Trough change in other variables. Money supply andStock index are also measured as fractional changes.Dependent Variable: RNGP
Data is for the NBER recessions starting in 1882,1887,1890, 1893,1895,1899,1902,1907,1910,
and 1913.With Heteroscedasticity-Consistent (Eicker-White) Standard Errors
(t-statistics in parentheses)
IndependentVariables
1 2 3 4
Constant0.404**(2.39)
0.002(0.08)
-0.032(-1.54)
0.041**(2.53)
RR Spread-0.282**(2.43)
-0.485*(-1.91)
-0.032(-0.33)
-0.291*(-1.78)
Commercial Paper 0.679***(5.31)
0.684***(5.33)
Stock Index0.237**(2.19)
0.319**(2.38)
0.636***(5.63)
0.233**(2.10)
M2 growth0.008(0.37)
0.025**(2.54)
Interaction 1-0.548***(-6.94)
Interaction 2-0.174(-0.10)
Observations 10 10 10 10
R2
0.814 0.407 0.732 0.814
R-bar2
0.720 0.111 0.518 0.665
* 10% significance level
** 5% significance level
*** 1% significance level
36
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
37/45
TABLE 9 NBER 20 Recession Amplitude, 20th
century.Recession amplitude (Peak-trough Real GNP as a fraction of Peak RGNP) for NBERcontractions, regressed against the Peak-Trough change in other variables. Money supply andStock index are also measured as fractional changes.Dependent Variable: RNGP
Data is for the NBER recessions starting in 1920, 1923,1926,1929, 1937, 1945, 1948, 1953,
1957, 1960, 1969, 1973, 1980, 1981, 1990, 2001.Dependent Variable: RNGP
With Heteroscedasticity-Consistent (Eicker-White) Standard Errors
(t-statistics in parentheses)
IndependentVariables
1 2 3 4
Constant0.048**(2.48)
0.061***(4.49)
0.039***(2.82)
0.072***(2.67)
Baa Spread-0.010(-0.48)
-0.025***(-3.12)
-0.014(-1.08)
0.031(0.94)
Discount Rate-0.004(-0.35)
-0.039***(-2.93)
Stock Index0.218**(2.27)
-0.045(-0.85)
0.014(0.22)
0.168**(2.45)
M2 growth0.765***(7.45)
-0.024(-0.05)
Interaction 1-0.341*(-1.76)
Interaction 2-0.041***(-3.54)
Observations 16 16 16 16
R2
0.506 0.743 0.834 0.763
R-bar2
0.383 0.679 0.774 0.677
* 10% significance level
** 5% significance level
*** 1% significance level
37
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
38/45
TABLE 10: PAGAN 19 Recession Amplitude associated with cycles in other variables.
This shows the results of regression of RGNP percent amplitude in an NBER contraction (P-T)
against the change other variables over their individual Harding-Pagan cycle.
Dependent Variable: RNGP
For the recessions of the 19th
century.
With Heteroscedasticity-Consistent (Eicker-White) Standard Errors
(t-statistics in parentheses)
IndependentVariables
1 2 3 4
Constant-0.128***(-4.65)
-0.095***(-3.54)
-0.114***(-3.54)
-0.232***(-4.74)
RR Spread-0.003(-0.08)
-0.058(-1.43)
-0.109**(-2.37)
-0.471***(-3.61)
Commercial Paper0.029***(3.81)
0.058***(6.71)
Stock Index0.384***(2.75)
0.509***(4.91)
0.616***(4.44)
0.552***(4.42)
M2 growth-0.206***(-3.65)
-0.038(-0.22)
Interaction 1-0.539(-1.18)
Interaction 20.196***(4.07)
Observations 10 10 10 10
R2
0.609 0.578 0.632 0.806R-bar
20.414 0.367 0.339 0.651
* 10% significance level
** 5% significance level
*** 1% significance level
38
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
39/45
Table 11: PAGAN 20 Recession Amplitude associated with cycles in other variables.
This shows the results of regression of RGNP percent amplitude in an NBER contraction (P-T)
against the change other variables over their individual Harding-Pagan cycle.
Dependent Variable: RNGP
With Heteroscedasticity-Consistent (Eicker-White) Standard Errors
(t-statistics in parentheses)
IndependentVariables
1 2 3 4
Constant0.075**(2.37)
0.064***(2.86)
0.038**(2.27)
0.033(0.82)
Baa Spread0.019(0.83)
0.012(0.68)
0.024***(3.63)
0.039(1.38)
Discount Rate-0.012**(-2.01)
0.020(1.19)
Stock Index0.014**(2.40)
0.006**(2.18)
0.003*(1.64)
-0.002(-0.23)
M2 growth0.083(0.41)
0.071(0.97)
Interaction 10.138***(13.34)
Interaction 2-0.015(-1.63)
Observations 15 15 15 15
R2
0.293 0.167 0.858 0.400R-bar
20.100 -0.060 0.801 0.160
* 10% significance level
** 5% significance level
*** 1% significance level
39
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
40/45
Table 12 Recession Amplitudes with and without large financial events.
P-T RGNP
Amplitude, 20th
credit M2 Stock
With crunch 10.4% 14.8% 15.2%
Without crunch 3.8% 2.9% 2.8%
t-statistic 0.98 1.57 1.34
P-T RGNPAmplitude, 19th
credit M2 Stock
With crunch 7.1% 6.9% 5.4%
Without crunch 0.1% -0.7% 0.8%
t-statistic 1.83** 3.12** 0.94
t-tests for equal mean with unequal variances.*significant at 10% level
**significant at 5% level
***significant at 1% level
40
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
41/45
41
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
42/45
-15
-10
-505
10
15
20
25
18
75
18
80
188
5
18
90
18
95
19
00
19
05
19
10
19
15
Log
change
Rea
lGNP
Comm
erc
ialban
ks
loans
M2
Source:Balke
&G
ordon,
NBER,
FederalReserve
Board,
FDIC,
Fried
m
an
&S
chw
artz,
Authors
calculations
012345678910 7
5
0
5
0
5
0
5
0
5
0
0.0
0
0.2
5
0.5
0
0.7
5
1.0
0
1.2
5
1.5
0
Percen
t
Ra
ilroa
d
bon
d
sprea
d(
rightsca
le)
Com
m
erc
ialpaper
ra
te
(leftsca
le)
Percen
t
-35
-25
-15
-55
15
25
35
45
19
20
19
25
19
30
19
35
19
40
19
45
19
50
19
55
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
9520
00
20
05
Log
change
Rea
lGNP
Com
m
erc
ialbank
sloans
M2
Source:Balke
&G
ordon,
NBER,
FederalReserve
Board,
FDIC,
Friedm
an
&S
chwartz,
Authors
calculations
0246810
12
14
0
5
0
5
0
5
0
5
0
5
7 0
7 5
0
5
0
5
0
5
Percen
t
Baa
bon
d
sprea
d
Discoun
tra
te
Figure1
42
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
43/45
43
012345678910
11
12
18
75
18
80
188
5
18
90
18
95
19
00
19
05
19
10
19
15
19
20
Source:
Stan
dar
d
an
d
Po
or
s
S&P
500
index
In
dex,
Logar
ithm
icsca
le
110
100
1000
10000
19
20
19
25
19
30
19
35
19
40 1
94
519
50
19
55
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85 1
990
19
95
20
00
20
05
Source:Standard
&P
oors
S&P5
00
index
Index,
Logarit
hm
icscale
Figure1
continued
020
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
1
1
1
2 1
3 1
4 1
5 1
6 1
7 1
1
1
1
Rea
lHPI
In
dex
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
44/45
44 -0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15 -
0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
BLS
Data
RGNPvs.RR
Spread(1800s)
RGNPcontraction
RR
sp
readcontraction
93
07
13
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
RGNPvs.
M2(1800s)
RGNPcontraction
93
07
13
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15 -
0.20
-0.12
-
0.04
0.04
0.12
0.20
0.28
BLSData
RGNPvs.CP(1800s)
CPcontraction
RGNPcontraction -0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
RGNPvs.Stocks(1800s)
RGNPcontraction
93
07
13
93
07
13
Figure2
-
7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil
45/45
50
-2.00
-1.50-
1.00
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
NPvs.BaaSpread(1900s)
Baaspreadcontraction
45
20
37
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40 -
1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
BLSData
RGNP
vs.Discount(19
00s)
Discountratecontraction
RGNPcontraction
45
29
20
37
RGNPv
s.M2(1900s)
45
29
20
3
7
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
RGN
Pvs.Stocks(190
0s)
RGNPcontraction
45
29
20
37
Figure3