bordo credit market turmoil

Upload: ecrcau

Post on 03-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    1/45

    Credit Market Turmoil, Monetary Policy and Business Cycles: an historical

    view.

    Michael D. BordoRutgers University and NBER

    Joseph G. Haubrich1

    Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

    1 The views expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank

    of Cleveland or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. We thank Kent Cherny and Sagar

    Shah for excellent research assistance, and David Wheelock for sharing data.

    1

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    2/45

    I. Introduction

    Creditmarketdistressarisesinitsmorevirulentformonlyincertainmonetary

    environments,andhasitsmostextremeeffectswhenitexacerbatesabusiness

    cycledownturn. Policyquestionsaboutacentralbanksroleaslenderoflast

    resortorregulatormustbeseeninthecontextofmonetarypolicy.

    Therelativelyinfrequentnatureofmajorcreditdistresseventsmakesan

    historicalapproachtotheseissuesparticularlyuseful.Usingacombinationof

    historicalnarrativeandeconometrictechniques,weidentifymajorperiodsof

    creditdistress1875to2007,examinetheextenttowhichcreditdistressarisesas

    partofthetransmissionofmonetarypolicy,anddocumentthesubsequenteffect

    onoutput.

    Theseissues

    involve

    relationships

    between

    policy

    rates

    (monetary

    aggregates)creditspreads,andGDPgrowth. Usingturningpointsdefinedby

    theHardingPaganalgorithm,wecomparethetiming,duration,amplitudeand

    comovementofcyclesinmoney,creditandoutput. Fortheperiodsincethe

    1920s,thisismosteasilydonewithariskspreadbetweencorporateand

    Treasurybonds,thediscountrate,andrealGDP. Thisallowsustopickoutand

    compareperiodsoftightcreditthatresultfromtightmonetarypolicyandthose

    thathaveamoreexogenouscause. Fortheperiodfrom1875to1920creditspreads

    are

    measured

    by

    differences

    between

    yields

    on

    different

    rail

    road

    bonds,

    andtheconditionsinthemoneymarketaremeasuredbycommercialpaper

    yields. Wealsoexaminethepatternsforrealstockpricessincestockmarketcrashesalsocanactasanexacerbatingfactorincreditturmoil.

    Literaturereview

    Theeffectofcreditonthebroadereconomyhasbeenofconcerntoeconomists

    sincetheearlydaysoftheprofession.Nineteenthcenturyauthorsoftenspokeof

    discredit,atermKindleberger(2000)adoptsforthelaterphaseofafinancial

    crises. Mitchell(1913)wasanearlyexpositorofthecreditchannelaswas

    Hansen(1921),andJ. LaurenceLaughlin(1913)testifiedthattheorganization

    creditismoreimportantthanthequestionofbanknotes.Disentanglingthe

    impactofcreditsupplyfromchangesindemandaswellasfromthemyriad

    2

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    3/45

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    4/45

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    5/45

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    6/45

    althoughthereweresomefamousregionalbusts,eg.Californiainthe1890s.In

    threeoftherecessionsassociatedwithpanics,BankofEnglandtighteningleadingto

    suddenstopofcapitalinflowswaslikelythesourceoftheshock.Inaddition

    monetarytighteningcontingentonthefearthatlegislationassociatedwiththeFree

    Silvermovement(BlandAllisonAct of1878andtheShermanSilverPurchaseActof

    1893)likelyledtothepanicof1893andthecurrency(andminorbanking)crisisof

    1896(FriedmanandSchwartz1963,Gorton1987).AccordingtoCalomirisand

    Hubbard(1989)citingSpragueandothers,creditcrunchesoccurredinthemajor

    recessions.

    ImportantEpisodes

    1873.AseriousinternationalcrisiswithoriginsinarealestatebustinViennaand

    BerlinwasintheU.S.associatedwithcorporatemalfeasanceinthedominantrailroadsector(BenmelechandBordo2008),astockmarketcrashandabanking

    panicwithwidespreadbankingfailures.Thepanicendedwiththesuspensionofof

    convertibilityofbankliabilitiesintocurrency.Theevidenceoffraudinrailroads

    precipitatedasuddenstopincapitalinflowsfromEngland.Theresultantrecession

    lasteduntil1879.Mishkin(1990)providesevidencethataqualityspreadbetween

    MoodysBaacorporatebondrateandthelongtermTreasurybondratespikedafter

    thebankingpanicandstockmarketcrash.Thisiscitedasevidenceforthepresence

    ofdeclining

    net

    worth

    and

    asymmetric

    information,

    which

    in

    turn

    increased

    agency

    costsandreducedbanklending.

    1893.Aseriousbankingandstockmarketcrashinthesummerof1893wastriggered

    bythepassageoftheShermanSilverPurchaseActwhichledtofearstheU.S.would

    beforcedoffthegoldstandardandtocapitalflight.Inthecrisishundredsofbanks

    failed.AttemptsbytheNewYorkClearingHousetoissueclearinghouseloan

    certificatesdidnotstopthepanic.Itendedwiththesuspensionofconvertibility.As

    inthecrisisof1873,CalomirisandHubbardciteevidenceofequilibriumcredit

    rationing,eg.Stevens(1894)wholesaletransactions[are]usuallydoneoncredit.

    [New]generalbusinesswasbeingdonealmostonacashbasispage141,and

    Mishkin(1990)showsthequalityspreadpeakswiththecrisis.Thecontractionof

    lendingbythebankingsystemasaresultofitstroublereduceditsroleinsolving

    6

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    7/45

    adverseselectionandagencyproblemsandclearlymadetheseproblemsworsein

    thefinancialmarkets(page19).

    1907.Thisseriousrecessionwasalsoaccompaniedbyabankingpanicandstock

    marketcrash.ItmayhavebeentriggeredbyBankofEnglandtighteningin1906in

    reactiontoagoldoutflowtotheU.S.tocoverinsuranceclaimsfromtheSan

    Franciscoearthquake(OdellandWeidenmeir2004).IntheU.S.thecollapseofa

    cornerofthecoppermarketinOctoberledtothefailureof8banks,followedbythe

    failureoftheKnickerbockerTrustCompany.Thisledtoarunontheothertrust

    companiesandthenageneralpanic.Theissueofclearinghouseloancertificates,the

    transferoffundsfromtheTreasurytokeyNewYorkbanksandarescuebya

    syndicateorganizedbyJ.P.Morganalleviatedthepressure,butthepaniconly

    endedwiththesuspensionofconvertibility.Thepanicwasassociatedwithhundredsofbankfailures,asignificantdropinmoneysupplyandadeeprecession.

    Asinotherpanicepisodes,CalomirisandHubbardcitecontemporaryevidencefora

    creditcrunch.Persons(1920)discussesahaltinfurthercreditexpansionpage147;

    Sprague(1910)Itwouldseem,then,pastbusinessdistressfromlackofcredit

    facilitieswasdueatleasttothreeinfluences:therestrictionofcashpaymentsbythe

    banksincreasedtherequirementsofborrowers;thesupplyofloanswasreducedby

    amoderateamountofcontraction;andtheshiftingofloansinvolvedconsiderable

    uncertaintyand

    inconveniences

    page

    303.

    Mishkin(1990),

    as

    in

    the

    previous

    crisis

    showsaspikeinthequalityspread.Accordingtohimthedeclineinthevaluation

    offirms[inthestockmarketcrash]raisesadverseselectionandagencyproblemsfor

    borrowingfirmsbecauseithasineffectloweredtheirnetworth.Theresulting

    increasesinasymmetricinformationproblemsevenbeforetheOctoberbanking

    panic,shouldraisethespreadbetweeninterestratesforhighandlowquality

    borrowers.Theprocessofsevereasymmetricproblemsevenbeforethebanking

    panicsuggeststhattheywerepotentiallyimportantfactorsincreatingasevere

    businesscyclecontraction.pp2127.

    1914.TheoutbreakofWorldWarIledtoamassivecapitaloutflowfromU.S.

    financialmarketstothebelligerents.ThismassivesuddenstopthreatenedtheNew

    Yorkstockmarket,thebankingsystemandU.S.goldreserves.TreasurySecretary

    McAdooinvokedtheAldrichVreelandActtoissueemergencycurrencytoallaythe

    7

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    8/45

    bankingpanic,closedtheNYSEandpooledU.S.goldreserves.Thecrisiswas

    largelyaverted.Thereisnonarrativeevidenceofacreditcrunch.

    2.19181945

    TheFederalReservewasestablishedin1914inparttosolvetheabsenceofalender

    oflastresortinthecrisesofthepre1914NationalBankingera.Initsfirst25years

    therewerethreeveryseverebusinesscycledownturns:192021,192933and1937

    38.Allthreewereassociatedwithverytightmoney.The192933recessionhadfour

    bankingpanicsproducingtheGreatContraction.Thestockmarketcrashedin1920,

    1929,193032 and1937.AccordingtoWhite(2008)therewasarealestateboombust

    inthe1920sandanotherin192933.Thereisconsiderableevidenceforcollapseof

    banklending(acreditcrunch)in193033and193738.AccordingtoBernanke(1983)

    boththenumerousbankfailuresthatoccurredandthecollapseinnetworthbroughtaboutbybankruptcies,fallingassetpricesanddeflation,increasedthecostofcredit

    intermediationandreducedrealoutputoverandabovetheeffortsofadeclinein

    moneysupplypositedbyFriedmanandSchwartz(1963).

    192021.

    TheFedtighteneddramaticallyraisingitsdiscountrateinlate1919torollback the

    inflationthathadbuiltupduringWorldWarIandtorestoreeffectiveadherenceto

    thegold

    standard.

    This

    followed

    asevere

    but

    brief

    recession

    (industrial

    production

    fell23%,wholesalepricesfell37%andunemploymentincreasedfrom4%to12%)

    possiblybecauseFedactionswerenotanticipated(Bordo,ErcegandLevin2007).No

    bankingcrisesoccurredbuttherewasastockmarketcrashaccordingtoMishkin

    andWhite(2002).Alsothereisnonarrativeevidenceforacreditcrunch,the

    transmission oftightmoneyoccurredthroughariseinrealinterestrates(Meltzer

    2005p.118).

    192933

    TheFedtightenedbeginninginearly1928tostemthestockmarketboomwhich

    beganin1926.ThistighteningledtoarecessioninAugust1929andastockmarket

    crashinOctober.TheNewYorkFedinitiallyfollowedexpansionarypolicyto

    preventamoneymarketpanicinOctober.Itthenstoppedeasingbytheendofthe

    year.DespitedemandsfromNewYork,theFederalReserveBoardinWashington,

    8

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    9/45

    followingtherealbillsdoctrine,wasconcernedaboutrekindlingstockmarket

    speculation.AseriesofbankingpanicsbeginninginOctober1930ensued.TheFed

    didlittletooffsetthemhenceallowingtherecessiontobecomeadepression.

    AccordingtoFriedmanandSchwartz(1963),thebankingpanicsreducedthemoney

    stockbyathirdandledtosimilardeclinesinrealoutputandprices.Theprocess

    wasaggravatedbydebtandassetpricedeflation.AccordingtoBernanke(1983)the

    bankfailuresandthecollapseofnetworth(Mishkin1978)raisedthecostofcredit

    intermediationseeninanincreaseinqualityspreads.Inaddition,Calomirisand

    Mason(2003) andCalomirisandWilson(2004)identifytheshockstobanklending

    (creditcrunch)usingrespectivelyapanelofbankdatabystatesandbyNewYork

    Citynationalbanks.

    193738RecoveryfromtheGreatContractionbeganwithRooseveltsBankingHolidayin

    earlyMarch1933andTreasurygoldpurchases(Romer1992).Itwasslowed

    somewhatbythesupplyshocksoftheNIRA(ColeandOhanian2004).Asecond

    severerecessionin193738wasproducedbyamajorFedpolicyerror.Itdoubled

    reserverequirementsin1936tosopupbanksexcessreserves.Thisledtoanother

    collapseinmoneysupplyandareturntosevererecession.BothBernanke(1983)and

    CalomirisandWilson(2004)seeevidenceforadeclineinthesupplyofbankloans

    (acrunch)

    in

    response

    to

    deflation

    and

    declining

    net

    worth.

    3.19451980

    TheFedemergedfromWorldWarIIstillpeggingTreasurybondprices.Thispolicy

    ledtohighinflationwhichendedwithtighteninginOctober1947(Romerand

    Romer1989)thatledtoarecessionin1948.ThefamousFederalReserveTreasury

    accordof1951restoredFedindependence.Thenext15yearswascharacterizedby

    relativelystablemonetarypolicy(Meltzer2004).TheFedunderWilliamMcChesney

    Martininthe1950sviewedpricestabilityasitsprimaryobjective.Onseveral

    occasions,whenfacingincipientinflation,theFedtightened, precipitatinga

    recession.

    Inthepostwarperiodtherewerenobankingpanicsandnoseriousstock

    marketcrashes.However,accordingtoWojinlower(1980,1982,1992),Credit

    crunchesoccurredwhentheFedtightenedraisingshortterminterestrates.Asrates

    9

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    10/45

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    11/45

    requirements:apparentlyithadshiftedtoapolicybasedonthepricemechanism

    ratherthancreditavailability.4(OwensandSchreft1993page26).YetonMay22,

    ChairmanBurnswrotealettertobankersaskingthemtoallocatecreditthrough

    nonpricerationinginsteadofraisingratesfurther(ibid).TheFedcontinuedto

    tightenthrough1974byrepeatedhikesinthediscountratebutceasedpressuring

    thebankswithnonpriceallocationtechniques(ibidpage28).

    4.19802007

    Inflationcontinuedunabatedthroughthe1970s.Debateswirlsoverthecausesof

    theGreatInflation19651982.Someobserversattributeittotheaccommodationof

    expansionaryfiscalpolicy,otherstothePhillipsCurvetradeoffandanunwilling

    nessdrivenbypoliticalpressuretoraiseunemploymentattheexpenseof inflation

    andotherstomeasurementerrorsinestimatingpotentialoutput(BordoandOrphanides2009).Finallyinthefaceofanexchangeratecrisisandgrowingpopular

    discontent,PresidentCarterinOctober1979appointedPaulVolckerasChairmanof

    theFederalReserve.MonetarypolicytightenedsignificantlyasVolckereffectively

    targeted monetaryaggregatesinsteadofinterestrates,andproducedaseriesof

    sizeablehikesinthefederalfundsrate.Howeverthetightmonetarystancewas

    temporarilyabandonedinmid1980aseconomicactivitydeceleratedsharply.

    InMarch1980attherequestoftheCarterAdministration,asasignaltothe

    publicin

    an

    election

    year

    of

    its

    willingness

    to

    fight

    inflation,

    the

    Fed

    imposed

    selectiveconsumercreditcontrols.Thecontrolsinvolveddirectrestrictionsonbank

    loangrowth.TheFedprovidedbroadguidelinesforcreditallocationsuggestingfor

    examplethatbanksavoidmakingunsecuredconsumerloans(OwensandSchreft

    1993page30).Theprogramledtoamarkeddeclineinconsumercreditaslending

    rateshitbindingusurylawceilings.Thisreducedpersonalconsumption,

    contributing toaverysharpdeclineineconomicactivity.Thecontrolswereliftedin

    July1980.

    TheFederalReserveembarkedonanewroundofmonetarytighteninginlate

    1980.Thefederalfundsrateroseto20percentinlateDecember,implyinganexpost

    realrateofabout10percent(Bordo,ErcegandLevin2007).NewlyelectedPresident

    ReaganssupportofVolckerspolicywassignificantingivingtheFederalReserve

    4According to Owens and Schreft (1993) the 1973-74 episode was not a true credit crunch which they

    define as non price credit rationing because bank lending rates were permitted to rise.

    11

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    12/45

    themandateitneededtokeepinterestrateselevatedforaprolongedperiod,and

    providedsomeshieldfromgrowingoppositioninCongress(Feldstein1993).This

    secondandmoredurableroundoftighteningsucceededinreducingtheinflation

    ratefromabout10percentinearly1981toabout4percentin1983,butatthecostof

    averysharpandveryprolongedrecession.Inthisepisodethereisnonarrative

    evidenceofacreditcrunch.

    Therecessionof199091wasprecededbyFedtighteningbeginningin

    December1988(RomerandRomer1994).ItcoincidedwiththefirstGulfWar.There

    wasnobankingcrisisbuttherewasastockmarketcrashinAugust1990.Therealso

    wasnotarealestatebustalthoughrealhousepricesdeclined13%19891993.

    AccordingtoBernankeandLown(1991)therewasacreditcrunchwhichtheydefine

    asasignificantleftwardshiftinthesupplyofbankloansholdingconstantthesafe

    realinterestrateandthequalityofpotentialborrowers.AccordingtothemacollapseinNewEnglandrealestatereducedtheirequitycapitalandforcedbanksto

    scalebacktheirlending.Thisreducedaggregatedemandviathelendingchannel

    (BernankeandBlinder1988)andcontributedtotherecession.

    OwensandSchreft(1993),whodefineacreditcrunchasnonpricecredit

    rationing,alsopositthattherewasacreditcrunchinthecommercialrealestate

    market,asectorspecificcreditcrunchthatpreventedcommercialrealestate

    developersandbusinessborrowersusingrealestateascollateralfromgettingcredit

    atany

    price

    (page

    50).

    Therecessionof2001wasprecededbyamildtighteningofmonetarypolicy

    (thefundsratewasraisedfrom41/2%inNovember1998to6%inMay),andthe

    collapseofthetechboominthestockmarketinthespringof2001.Thereisno

    narrativeevidenceofarealestatebustoracreditcrunch.

    FinallytherecessionwhichbeganinDecember2007wasprecededbyFed

    tighteningbeginninginJune2004following3yearsofexcessivelylowrates.The

    lowpolicyratesaswellasaglobalsavingsgluthelpedfundahousingboomwhich

    begandeflatingattheendof2006.Theensuinghousingbustinitiallycentered on

    theU.S.subprimemortgagemarket inthespringof2007.Factorsbehindtheboom

    inadditiontolowinterestrates includeU.S.governmentinitiativestoextendhome

    ownership,changesinfinancialregulation,laxoversightandtherelaxingofprudent

    standards(Bordo2008).

    12

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    13/45

    Thedefaultonsubprimemortgagesproducedspillovereffectsaroundtheworld

    viathesecuritizedmortgagederivativesintowhichthesemortgageswerebundled,

    tothebalancesheetsofinvestmentbanks,hedgefundsandconduitswhich

    intermediatebetweenmortgageandotherassetbackedcommercialpaper andlong

    termsecurities.Theuncertaintyaboutthevalueofthesecuritiescollateralizedby

    thesemortgagesledtothefreezingoftheinterbanklendingmarketinAugust2007

    andsubsequentlytoamassivecreditcrunch.Thecollapseincreditreflectedasevere

    dropinassetpriceswhicherodednetworthandcollateralgreatlyincreasingagency

    costs andqualityspreads.Inadditiontheweakeningofmajorbanksbalancesheets

    hasimpairedtheirlending.Thishasbeengreatlyaggravatedbyamorethan50%

    dropinstockprices.Despiteextensivecentralbankliquidityinjectionsandthe

    creationofanumberoffacilitiesattheFedtorejuvenatethecreditmarkets,the

    crunchstillprevails.ThecreditcrunchhasproducedaseriousrecessionintheU.S.whichhasspreadtotherestoftheworld.

    III. EmpiricalMethodologyWithanaimofexaminingcyclesinmoney,creditandoutputsince1875,data

    availabilityandconsistencybecomekeyissues. Forbusinesscycles,weusethe

    NBERchronology(ataquarterlyfrequency). ForRealGrossNationalProduct(note

    itisGNP,notGDP)weusethenumbersfromBalkeandGordon(1986),extended

    viathe

    NIPA

    accounts.

    Likewise

    for

    the

    money

    supply,

    we

    use

    the

    M2

    numbers

    fromBalkeandGordon,splicedandupdatewiththeM2numbersfromtheBoardof

    Governors. Formanyotherseries,1919becomesanaturalbreakpoint.Forthe

    interestrate(risk)spreadin1919andafter,weuseMoodysSeasonedBaaCorporate

    BondYield(%p.a.)lessLongTermTreasuryComposite,Over10Years(%p.a.). For

    theearlierperiod,weconstructadifferencebetweenaveragesofthehighyielding

    andlowyieldingrailroadbondyieldstakenfromMaCaulay(1938)5. MaCaulayis

    alsothesourceforearlyvaluesofcommercialpaper. Thediscountratesince1945is

    theratefromtheBoardofGovernorsandpriortothatistherateattheFederal

    ReserveBankofNewYork,fromBankingandMonetaryStatistics(1943). Thestock

    priceindexfor18751917istheCowlesCommissionindex,itsleveladjustedto

    5 For 1914 quarter 3, the markets were closed, and we entered a judgmental value of 1% for the spread. As

    this was a time of turmoil in the markets, it is not an innocuous assumption.

    13

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    14/45

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    15/45

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    16/45

    Thesecondsetofregressionslooksathowmonetary,credit,andasset

    cyclesaffectthebusinesscycle. Forexample,dorecessionsthatstartduringa

    creditcrunchlookdifferentthanthosethatdont? EachNBERcontractionis

    associatedwiththemoney,credit,orassetcyclephasethatitstartsin. The

    amplitudeofthecontractionisthenregressedagainsttheamplitudeoftheother

    cyclephases. Forexample,arecessionthatstartsinaperiodoftighteningcredit

    andtighteningmonetarypolicyisassociatedwiththeamplitudesofthosetwo

    contractionphases.

    IV. EmpiricalResultsCyclecharacteristics

    Inoursample,from1875:Ito2007:III,wehave27(NBER)recessions,counted

    ascompletepeaktotroughepisodes.Tables2and3reportthemeanamplitudeanddurationofcyclesforthe1875:I1918:IVperiod,andtables4and5reportthe

    amplitude and durations for 1919:I2007:IV, calculated for the peaktotrough

    andtroughtopeak. Ifthebeginningquartersbelongtoacontractionthatstarted

    before our sample, those are not counted. Likewise for an expansion that

    continuesbeyondoursample.

    Theaveragedurationofarecession(peaktoTrough)is15.4months,thatof

    anexpansion39months. Becauseofdatalimitations,weseparatelylookattwo

    subsamples,

    from

    1875:I

    to

    1918:IV

    and

    from

    1919:I

    to

    2007:IV,

    the

    period

    for

    which we have Federal Reserve discount rate data. For the later period,

    recessionshaveshortenedandexpansionslengthened. Fortheearlyperiod,the

    averagedurationofa recession is6quarters (8.3 forexpansions).For the later

    period,thedurationsare4.5forcontractions,17.7quartersforexpansions.

    Creditshowsalongercycle. Fortheearliersample,ourmeasureofcredit

    is the spreadbetweendifferent rail roadbonds. These show ameanpeakto

    trough duration of 8.25 quarters, and a troughtopeak duration of nearly 10

    quarters,aswellasshowingnoticeably longermaximumcycles. Alsonotethe

    greater symmetry between expansions and contractions in the credit spread

    series.Forconsistency,thePTofratesandspreadsshouldbecomparedtotheT

    PofRGNP.For the latersample,using the spreadbetweenMoodys seasoned

    Baacorporatebondyieldlessthe longtermtreasurycomposite,contractions,

    orperiodsofgenerally falling spreads, lastanaverageof11.1quarters, longer

    16

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    17/45

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    18/45

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    19/45

    associate the amplitude of the NBER recession with the amplitude of that

    monetary contraction (which will rarely have the same turning points or

    duration). Tables10and11reporttheresultsforthe19thand20thcenturies. The

    resultsarebroadlysimilar to those in theNBER focusedregressionofTables9

    and10,buttherearesomedifferences. Thecoefficientontheriskspreadshows

    up as positive in the 20th century. The stock index remains positive and

    significant,exceptwheninteraction2isadded.

    Both the historical narrative and the empirical results suggest that a

    confluence of financial shocksin risk spreads, assets prices and money

    supplywill exacerbate a contraction, or at least be associated with deeper

    contractions. Acloser look that thedeeperrecessions inoursamplebears this

    out, even though the correspondencebetween financial shocks and depth of

    recession is not onetoone. Figures 2 and 3 provide scatterplots of recessionamplitude against the risk spread, shortterm rates,money supply, and stock

    movements.

    SincetheFirstWorldWar,fourrecessionareparticularlydeep(measured

    aspercentchange inrealGNP frompeak to trough): thoseof1929,1945,1920,

    and 1937. Thesewere at least triple the sizeof anyother contraction (with a

    possible exception of the combined 19801981 drop). 1945 stands out as an

    anomaly, but the other three stand out as having the three largest drops

    percentagedrops

    in

    the

    money

    supply

    and

    stock

    prices,

    and

    two

    of

    the

    three

    largest increases in the risk spread. Contemporary accounts of the 1920

    contraction do not mention a credit crunch in line with the only moderate

    increaseintheriskspreadinthatcontraction.

    PriortotheFirstWorldWar,threecontractionsstandout,allovertwiceas

    deepastheothers:1907,1893,and1913. Theconnectionswithfinancialshocks

    areperhapsnot as striking as for the laterperiod,but still strong. The three

    contractionshavetwoofthetopthreedeclines instockprices,andthetoptwo

    changes inmoney andbond spread. Contemporary accounts noted a credit

    crunchin1893despiteonlyasmallmovementintheriskspread.

    An alternative approach is to sort on the size of movements in risk

    spreads,money and stockprices, looking to see if largermovements in these

    variables leads to larger recessions. SinceWorldWar I, four contractionshad

    particularlylargeincreaseintheBaaspread,fourhadparticularlylargedropsin

    19

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    20/45

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    21/45

    the differencebetween the yield on Baabonds and longterm Treasuries has

    movedup393basispoints,a larger increase that seen in the1929contraction,

    and approaching the combine increase of 436 bp over both the Depression

    contractions. ThepercentagedropininS&Pindexof44.5%issecondonlytothe

    78% of theGreatContraction. Money supply,however, is adifferentmatter,

    withanincreaseof15.2%inthecurrentperiod,thelargestincreaseofM2seenin

    any contraction. This should not be particularly surprising, however. As

    Friedman and Schwartz point out, prior to deposit insurancebanking panics

    wouldcauseacollapse in themoneymultiplier,drivingM2down. Zarnowitz

    (1992)showsthatbusinesscyclesdownturnswithpanicsaremuchmoresevere

    thanothers. Todaybecauseofdeposit insuranceetc financialturmoildoesnot

    lead topanicsandcollapses in themoneymultiplier,andcredit turmoil is less

    likely to feed into the money supply. The credit disturbance thusbecomesrelatively more important, given that disturbances on the asset side of the

    balancesheetnolongerhaveasstronganinfluenceonthemoneysupply.

    21

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    22/45

    References

    PatrickK.AseaandS.BrockBlomberg(1998)LendingCycles,Journalof

    Econometricsvol.83pp.89128.

    NathanS.BalkeandRobertJ.Gordon,(1986)AppendixB:HistoricalData,The

    AmericanBusinessCycle:continuityandchange,NBERStudiesinBusinessCycles,

    UniversityofChicagoPress,Chicago.

    RobertJ. BarroandJosF.Ursa,(2009)StockMarketCrashesand

    Depressions,NBERworkingpaper14769.

    AnneL.BeattyandAnneGron,(2001)Capital,Portfolio,andGrowth:Bank

    BehaviorunderRiskBasedCapitalGuidelinesJournalofFinancialServices

    Research,vol.20pp.531.

    EphraimBenmelechandMichaelBordo(2008)TheFinancialCrisisof1873and

    19thCenturyAmericanCorporateGovernanceHarvardUniversity(mimeo)

    BenBernanke(1983)NonMonetaryEffectsoftheFinancialCrisisinthe

    PropagationoftheGreatDepression.AmericanEconomicReviewLXXIII.pp217

    76

    BenBernanke

    and

    Alan

    Blinder

    (1988)

    Credit,

    Money,

    and

    Aggregate

    Demand

    AmericanEconomicReview PapersandProceedings78:43539

    BenBernankeandMarkGertler,(1989) AgencyCosts,NetWorthandBusiness

    Fluctuations,AmericanEconomicReview,vol.79,pp.1431.

    BenBernanke,MarkGertlerandSimonGilchrist,(1996)TheFinancial

    AcceleratorandtheFlighttoQuality,TheReviewofEconomicsandStatistics,vol.

    78pp.115.

    BenBernankeandCaraLown (1991)TheCreditCrunch.BrookingsPapers

    on

    EconomicActivity.2:1991.pp205239

    BoardofGovernorsoftheFederalReserveSystem,(1943)BankingandMonetary

    Statistics,19141941,Washington,DC.

    22

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    23/45

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    24/45

    CharlesCalomirisandBerryWilson(2004).BankCapitalandPortfolio

    Management:The1930sCapitalCrunchandtheScrambletoShedRisk.

    JournalofBusiness.Vol77.No.3.pp421455.

    CharlesT.CarlstromandTimS.Fuerst,(1997)AgencyCosts,netWorkand

    BusinessFluctuations:acomputablegeneralequilibriumanalysisAmerican

    EconomicReview,vol.87,pp.893910.

    Claessens,Stijn,MAyhanKoseandMarcoE.Terrones,(2008)WhatHappens

    duringRecessions,CrunchesandBusts? IMFworkingpaper,WP/08/274.

    OttoEcksteinandAllenSinai(1986)TheMechanismsoftheBusinessCyclein

    thePostwarEra.InRobertJ.Gordoned.TheAmericanBusinessCycle:Continuity

    andChange.NationalBureauofEconomicResearchStudiesinBusinessCycles,

    vol25.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress

    M.Fazzari,R.GlennHubbard,andBruceC.Petersen,(1988), Financing

    ConstraintsandCorporateInvestmentBrookingsPapersonEconomicActivity,

    Vol.1988,No.1pp.141206

    MiltonFriedmanandAnnaJ.Schwartz(1963)AMonetaryHistoryoftheUnited

    States18671960.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.

    SimonGilchrist,

    Vladimir

    Yankov,

    and

    Egon

    Zakraj

    sek,(2008)

    Credit

    Market

    ShocksandEconomicFluctuations:EvidencefromCorporateBondandStock

    Marketsworkingpaper.

    GaryB.Gorton(1988)BankingPanicsandBusinessCycles?OxfordEconomic

    Papers NewSeries40.pp751781.

    Gorton,GaryB.,andPingHe,(2008)BankCreditCycles.

    Harding,DonandAdrianPagan,SynchronizationofCycles,Journalof

    Econometrics,vol.132,(2006)pp.5979.

    _________and______,DissectingtheCycle:amethodologicalinvestigation

    JournalofMonetaryEconomics,vol.49,(2002)pp.365381.

    24

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    25/45

    Haubrich,JosephG.andPaulWachtel,(1993)CapitalRequirementsandShifts

    inCommercialBankPortfoliosEconomicReview,(FederalReserveBankof

    Cleveland)vol.29,pp.215.

    AlvinH.Hansen,(1927)BusinessCycleTheory,Boston,Ginn.

    OwenLamont,(1997),CashFlowandInvestment:EvidencefromInternal

    CapitalMarketsTheJournalofFinance,Vol.52,pp.83109

    CaraLownandDonaldP.Morgan(2005)TheCreditCycleandtheBusiness

    Cycle:newfindingsusingthesurveyofseniorloanofficers,JournalofMoney,

    CreditandBankingvol.

    FrederickR.Macaulay,(1938)SomeTheoreticalProblemsSuggestedbyThe

    Movementsof

    Inerest

    Rates,

    bond

    Yields

    and

    Stock

    Prices

    in

    the

    United

    States

    since

    1856,NBER.

    AllanH.Meltzer(2003)AhistoryoftheFederalReserveVolume1,19131951.

    Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.

    FredericS.Mishkin(1978)TheHouseholdBalanceSheetandtheGreat

    DepressionJournalofEconomicHistory38(December):91837.

    FredericS.

    Mishkin(

    1990)

    Asymmetric

    Information

    and

    Financial

    Crises:

    A

    HistoricalPerspectiveNBERWorkingPaperNo.3400.July

    FredericS.MishkinandEugeneN.white(2002)U.S.StockMarketCrashesand

    TheirAftermath;ImplicationsforMonetaryPolicy.NBERWorkingpaper

    no.8992June.

    WesleyClairMitchell,(1913),BusinessCycles,Univ.ofCaliforniaPress,Berkeley.

    KerryOdellandMarcWeidenmeir(2004)RealShock,MonetaryAftershock:

    the1906SanFranciscoEarthquakeandthePanicof1907Journalof

    Economic

    History52(December):757784.

    RaymondE.OwensandStaceyL.Schreft,(1993)IdentifyingCreditCrunches.

    FederalReserveBankofRichmondWorkingPaper932.

    25

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    26/45

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    27/45

    AlbertM.Wojnilower(1985) PrivateCreditDemand,SupplyandCrunches,

    HowDifferentarethe1980s.AmericanEconomicReview.Vol75No.2May,pp

    351356.

    AlbertM.Wojnilower(1992) CreditCrunchesintheNewPalgraveDictionary

    ofMoneyandFinance.London:MacMillan.

    27

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    28/45

    TABLE 1:Descriptive Data 1873-2008

    NBERBusiness

    Cycle Peak

    BankingCrises

    StockMarketCrash

    RealEstateBust

    TightMonetary

    Policy

    CreditCrunch

    Comments

    1 October

    1873

    September

    1873

    September

    1873

    no Bank of

    Englandtightens

    ? International Financial

    Crisis; real estate bustin Germany, Austria;

    Railroad scandal stockmarket crisis andserious recession

    focused on railroads.Panic ends withsuspension ofconvertibility.

    2 March 1882 June 1884 February1884

    no no yes1

    Minor panicconsequent upon

    failure of Grant andWard, attenuated byNY clearing house.

    3 March 1887 no no no no no Minor recession

    4 July 1890 November1890

    November1890

    no Bank ofEnglandtightens

    no Baring crisis inLondon caused byArgentine defaults.Bank of England

    tightening leads tosudden stop, minor

    banking panicattenuated by NYclearing house.

    5 January1893

    May 1893 May 1893 no Silver risk yes1

    Major U.S. bankingpanic related to fearsU.S. would be found

    off gold standard afterpassage of ShermanSilver Purchase Act.

    Panic ends with

    suspension ofconvertibility.

    6 December1895

    October1896

    2

    no no Silver risk no Gorton(1987)identifies a banking

    panic but Sprague andFriedman and

    Schwartz (1963) donot. Silver risk inducedrun on U.S. Treasury

    gold reservesstemmed by Belmont

    MorganSyndicate(Friedman

    and Schwartz)

    7 June 1899 no no no no no Minor recession

    8 September1902

    no October1903

    no no no Minor recession. Richman's panic

    (Friedman andSchwartz p.151)

    28

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    29/45

    NBERBusiness

    Cycle Peak

    BankingCrises

    StockMarketCrash

    RealEstateBust

    TightMonetary

    Policy

    CreditCrunch

    Comments

    9 May 1907 October1907

    October1907

    no Bank ofEnglandtightens

    yes1

    Major recession andbanking panic, rescue

    by JPMorgan,

    suspension ofconvertibility.

    Contemporariesdiscuss credit

    squeeze.

    10 January1910

    no no no no no Minor recession

    11 January1913

    August1914

    (incipient)

    August1914

    (incipient)

    no no no Outbreak of WorldWar I

    12 August 1918 no Fall 1917 no no no Mild recession,Mishkin and

    White(2002) attributestock market crisis torising interest rates

    and controls on newissues.

    13 January1920

    no Fall 1920 no yes no Major recessioninduced by Fed tightmoney to roll backwartime inflation.

    14 May 1923 no no no yes no Minor recession. Fedfollowed policy of

    moderaterestraint(Friedman

    and Schwartz 1963.p.287) to offset

    incipient inflation.

    15 October1926

    no no no3

    yes no Minor recession. Fedtakes "moderate

    restrainingmeasures"(Friedmanand Schwartz 1963.

    p.288)

    16 August 1929 October1930 April

    1931Sept/Oct

    1931Jan/Feb

    1933

    October1929

    yes4

    yes yes5

    Great contraction.Tight Fed policy 1928-

    29 to stem stockmarket speculation for

    Banking crises.Contraction in net

    worth, debt deflation,bank capital crunch.

    17 May 1937 no February1937 May

    1940

    no yes yes6

    Major recession. Feddoubles reserve

    requirements in 1936,Contraction in networth, bank capital

    crunch.

    18 February1945

    no September1946

    no no no End of World War II.Sharp decreases in

    governmentexpenditures.

    Adjustment from warto peace.

    29

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    30/45

    NBERBusiness

    Cycle Peak

    BankingCrises

    StockMarketCrash

    RealEstateBust

    TightMonetary

    Policy

    CreditCrunch

    Comments

    19 November

    1948

    no no no yes no Fed tightens to offset

    post war inflation.

    20 July 1953 no no no yes yes8

    Mild recession.

    Moderate tightening

    reflecting Fed concern

    of inflation. Bond crisis

    raises rates.

    21 August 1957 no no no yes9

    yes10

    Significant recession

    induced by Fed

    tightening. Evidence

    of credit rationing.

    22 April 1960 no Spring

    190211

    no yes yes12

    Mild recession

    induced by Fed

    tightening.Disintermediation as

    market rates pierced

    Regulation Q. ceilings

    leads to reduced bank

    lending.

    August

    - Sept

    196613

    "Credit crunch" of

    1966 background of

    Fed tightening

    monetary policy end of

    1965. Fed bank

    regulators urged

    restraint on bank

    lending.Disintermediation

    Regulation Q. ceilings

    bound.

    23 December

    1969

    no14

    May 1970 no yes15

    yes16

    Mild recession. Fed

    tightening and

    jawboning by Fed and

    government to restrain

    lending.

    Disintermediation as

    market rates exceed

    Regulation Q. ceilings.

    24 November

    1973

    no17 November

    197318

    no yes yes19 Fed tightening. OPEC

    shock. Significant

    recession. Arthur

    Burns May 1974 urges

    banks to allocate

    credit through non

    price rationing.

    30

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    31/45

    NBERBusiness

    Cycle Peak

    BankingCrises

    StockMarketCrash

    RealEstateBust

    TightMonetary

    Policy

    CreditCrunch

    Comments

    25 January

    1980

    no no no yes yes Significant Fed

    tightening begins

    October 1979 (Volcker

    shock). March 1980Fed at Carter's

    administration request

    imposes selective

    consumer credit

    controls. Controls

    lifted July 1980.

    26 July 1981 no no no yes no Tight Fed policy

    induces serious

    recession.

    27 July 1990 no August

    1990

    no25

    yes26

    yes27

    Fed tightening. Gulf

    war. Mild recession.Evidence of non price

    credit rationing and a

    capital crunch.

    28 March 2001 no Spring

    2001

    no yes no Fed restraint leads to

    mild recession, tech

    bust

    29 December

    2007

    September October28

    yes29

    yes30

    yes Fed tightening

    beginning in June

    2004 may have

    helped trigger a real

    estate bust, Lehman

    Brothers failure, creditcrunch, stock market

    slide, and severe

    recession.

    Endnotes

    1Calomiris and Hubbard(1989) Citing Sprague and others.

    2Gorton(1987).

    3Florida land bust, White(2008).

    4White(2008).

    5

    Bernanke(1983), Calomiris and Mason(2003), Calomiris and Wilson(2004).6Bernanke(1983), Calomiris and Wilson(2004).

    7Romer and Romer(1989) pick October 1947 as the start of Fed tightening.

    8Wojnilower(1992) states that bank lending was impaired by the collapse in Treasury bond

    prices.9Romer and Romer(1989) date tightening as beginning September 1955.

    10Wojnilower(1980, 1982, 1992), Eckstein and Sinai(1985) discuss credit rationing as leading to

    the 1957-58 recession.

    31

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    32/45

    11Real stock prices decline by 29% January 1966 to October 1966(Bordo, Dueker and Wheelock

    2008).12

    According to Wojnilower(1980, 1992), Fed tightening pushed T-bill rates above the Regulation

    Q ceiling leading to disintermediation.13

    Wojnilower(1980), Owens and Schreft(1993).14

    Penn Central collapse in July 1970. The Fed averted a crisis by backstopping the money center

    banks' support of the commercial paper market.15

    Romer and Romer(1989) date Fed tightening as beginning in December 1968.16

    Owens and Schreft(1993).17

    Failures of Franklin National Bank October 1974 and Germany's Herstatt Bank June 1974.18

    Romer and Romer(1989) date monetary tightening as beginning in April 1974.19

    Owens and Schreft(1993).20

    Real stock prices decline by 20%, November 1980 to July 1982(Bordo, Dueker and Wheelock

    2008).21

    Shiller(2005) figure 2.1 shows a 13% decline in real house prices 1979-1993.22

    Owens and Schreft(1993).

    23Failures of Continental Illinois and Penn Square banks in 1984. Also Savings and Loan crisis in

    1984.24Owens and Schreft(1993).

    25Shiller(2005) figure 2.1 shows a 13% decline in real house prices 1989-1993.

    26Romer and Romer(1989) give December 1988 as the beginning of tight policy.

    27Bernanke and Lown(1991) provide evidence of a capital crunch in New England. Bonds

    reduced lending to replenish their capital to meet regulatory standard. Owens and

    Schreft(1993) document non price credit rationing in the real estate sector.

    28The Standard and Poor stock price index declined 55%. July 2007 to March 2009.

    29The Case and Shiller real home price index declined 33% from December 2006 to October

    2008.

    30The Federal Funds rate increased from a trough in May 2004 at 1.00% to a peak of 5.26% in

    July 2007.

    Sources

    Banking Crises: Bordo(1986), Friedman and Schwartz(1963), Gorton(1987).

    Stock Market Crashes: Bordo(1985), Bordo, Dueker and Wheelock(2008), Friedman and

    Schwartz(1963), Mishkin and White(2002), Sprague(1910)

    Real Estate Busts: Shiller(2005), White(2008).

    Tight Monetary Policy: Friedman and Schwartz(1963), Meltzer(2004), Romer and Romer(1989).

    Credit Crunch: Bernanke(1985), Bernanke and Lown(1991), Calomiris and Hubbard(1987),

    Calomiris and Mason(2003), Calomiris and Wilson(2004), Eckstein and Sinai(1985), Owens and

    Schreft(1993), Wojnilower(1980, 1985, 1992).

    32

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    33/45

    Amplitude Peak-

    Trough

    P-T % Trough-peak T-P %

    RGNP (NBER

    cycles)

    -11.13 -7.8% 36.37 34.1%

    Rail Road Spread -0.28 0.27CP -2.63 2.51

    M2 growth 10.4% 12.1%

    Table 2: Cycle Amplitudes, 1875:1-1918:4, quarterly

    Duration (Quarters) 19th Peak-Trough Trough-peak

    RGNP (NBER cycles) mean 6

    max 13min 3

    8.3

    125

    Rail Road Spread mean 8.25max 18

    min 2

    9.89

    36

    2

    CP mean 5.54max 11

    min 3

    6.75

    14

    3

    M2 growth mean 7.45max 18

    min 4

    6.91

    12

    3

    Table 3 Cycle durations, 1875:1-1918:4, quarterly

    33

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    34/45

    Amplitude Peak-Trough P-T % Trough-peak T-P %

    RGNP (NBER

    cycles)

    -28.69 -5.9% 238.52 29.0%

    Baa Spread -1.18 1.14

    Discount Rate -2.18 2.18M2 growth -2.9% 3.1%

    Table 4: Cycle Amplitudes, 1920:1 to 2007:4

    Duration

    20thPeak-Trough Trough-peak

    RGNP

    (NBER

    cycles)

    mean 4.5

    max 14

    min 2

    17.7404

    Baa Spread mean 11.1max 30

    min 4

    8.421

    2

    Discount

    Rate

    mean 8.8125

    max 18

    min 2

    20.8

    66

    9

    M2 growth mean 11max 65

    min 3

    6152

    Table 5: Cycle Durations, 1920:1 to 2007:4

    34

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    35/45

    Baa Discount M2 (log dif) NBER

    Baa SpreadconcordanceExpected concordance

    Prob. Of independence

    1 54.0%

    48.8%

    26%

    40.3

    50.5

    0.5%

    34.4%

    45.5%

    0.005%Discount Rate 1 38.1

    49.50.4%

    61.6

    54.60.9%

    M2 (log difference) 1 50.3

    48.0

    35.4%

    NBER cycle 1

    Table 6: Concordances, expected concordances, and probability of independence(regression method) for 20th century series: 1920:1 to 2007:4, quarterly, M2 is annual log

    difference, using data from 1919:1 calculated from Balke-Gordon, spliced with Board of

    Governors M2 data.Moody's Seasoned Baa Corporate Bond Yield (% p.a.) less Long-Term TreasuryComposite, Over 10 Years (% p.a.)

    Discount Rate: Pre 1945, FRB NY rate, then BOG rate.

    NBER Rail spread CP rate M2 (log dif)

    NBER CycleconcordanceExpected concordance

    Prob. Of independence

    1 59.7%

    50.1%

    8.1%

    63.6

    51.0

    1.3%

    50.6%

    49.8%

    80.9%Railroad Spread 1 54.0

    50.137.9%

    50.0

    50.084.3 %

    Commercial Paper

    rate

    1 39.2

    49.76.4%

    M2 (log difference) 1

    Real GNP 67.054.1%

    0.000%

    Table 7: same as above, for 19th

    century data, 1875:1 to 1918:4 (quarterly).

    35

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    36/45

    Table 8 NBER 19 Recession Amplitude, 19th Century.Recession amplitude (Peak-trough Real GNP as a fraction of Peak RGNP) for NBERcontractions, regressed against the Peak-Trough change in other variables. Money supply andStock index are also measured as fractional changes.Dependent Variable: RNGP

    Data is for the NBER recessions starting in 1882,1887,1890, 1893,1895,1899,1902,1907,1910,

    and 1913.With Heteroscedasticity-Consistent (Eicker-White) Standard Errors

    (t-statistics in parentheses)

    IndependentVariables

    1 2 3 4

    Constant0.404**(2.39)

    0.002(0.08)

    -0.032(-1.54)

    0.041**(2.53)

    RR Spread-0.282**(2.43)

    -0.485*(-1.91)

    -0.032(-0.33)

    -0.291*(-1.78)

    Commercial Paper 0.679***(5.31)

    0.684***(5.33)

    Stock Index0.237**(2.19)

    0.319**(2.38)

    0.636***(5.63)

    0.233**(2.10)

    M2 growth0.008(0.37)

    0.025**(2.54)

    Interaction 1-0.548***(-6.94)

    Interaction 2-0.174(-0.10)

    Observations 10 10 10 10

    R2

    0.814 0.407 0.732 0.814

    R-bar2

    0.720 0.111 0.518 0.665

    * 10% significance level

    ** 5% significance level

    *** 1% significance level

    36

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    37/45

    TABLE 9 NBER 20 Recession Amplitude, 20th

    century.Recession amplitude (Peak-trough Real GNP as a fraction of Peak RGNP) for NBERcontractions, regressed against the Peak-Trough change in other variables. Money supply andStock index are also measured as fractional changes.Dependent Variable: RNGP

    Data is for the NBER recessions starting in 1920, 1923,1926,1929, 1937, 1945, 1948, 1953,

    1957, 1960, 1969, 1973, 1980, 1981, 1990, 2001.Dependent Variable: RNGP

    With Heteroscedasticity-Consistent (Eicker-White) Standard Errors

    (t-statistics in parentheses)

    IndependentVariables

    1 2 3 4

    Constant0.048**(2.48)

    0.061***(4.49)

    0.039***(2.82)

    0.072***(2.67)

    Baa Spread-0.010(-0.48)

    -0.025***(-3.12)

    -0.014(-1.08)

    0.031(0.94)

    Discount Rate-0.004(-0.35)

    -0.039***(-2.93)

    Stock Index0.218**(2.27)

    -0.045(-0.85)

    0.014(0.22)

    0.168**(2.45)

    M2 growth0.765***(7.45)

    -0.024(-0.05)

    Interaction 1-0.341*(-1.76)

    Interaction 2-0.041***(-3.54)

    Observations 16 16 16 16

    R2

    0.506 0.743 0.834 0.763

    R-bar2

    0.383 0.679 0.774 0.677

    * 10% significance level

    ** 5% significance level

    *** 1% significance level

    37

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    38/45

    TABLE 10: PAGAN 19 Recession Amplitude associated with cycles in other variables.

    This shows the results of regression of RGNP percent amplitude in an NBER contraction (P-T)

    against the change other variables over their individual Harding-Pagan cycle.

    Dependent Variable: RNGP

    For the recessions of the 19th

    century.

    With Heteroscedasticity-Consistent (Eicker-White) Standard Errors

    (t-statistics in parentheses)

    IndependentVariables

    1 2 3 4

    Constant-0.128***(-4.65)

    -0.095***(-3.54)

    -0.114***(-3.54)

    -0.232***(-4.74)

    RR Spread-0.003(-0.08)

    -0.058(-1.43)

    -0.109**(-2.37)

    -0.471***(-3.61)

    Commercial Paper0.029***(3.81)

    0.058***(6.71)

    Stock Index0.384***(2.75)

    0.509***(4.91)

    0.616***(4.44)

    0.552***(4.42)

    M2 growth-0.206***(-3.65)

    -0.038(-0.22)

    Interaction 1-0.539(-1.18)

    Interaction 20.196***(4.07)

    Observations 10 10 10 10

    R2

    0.609 0.578 0.632 0.806R-bar

    20.414 0.367 0.339 0.651

    * 10% significance level

    ** 5% significance level

    *** 1% significance level

    38

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    39/45

    Table 11: PAGAN 20 Recession Amplitude associated with cycles in other variables.

    This shows the results of regression of RGNP percent amplitude in an NBER contraction (P-T)

    against the change other variables over their individual Harding-Pagan cycle.

    Dependent Variable: RNGP

    With Heteroscedasticity-Consistent (Eicker-White) Standard Errors

    (t-statistics in parentheses)

    IndependentVariables

    1 2 3 4

    Constant0.075**(2.37)

    0.064***(2.86)

    0.038**(2.27)

    0.033(0.82)

    Baa Spread0.019(0.83)

    0.012(0.68)

    0.024***(3.63)

    0.039(1.38)

    Discount Rate-0.012**(-2.01)

    0.020(1.19)

    Stock Index0.014**(2.40)

    0.006**(2.18)

    0.003*(1.64)

    -0.002(-0.23)

    M2 growth0.083(0.41)

    0.071(0.97)

    Interaction 10.138***(13.34)

    Interaction 2-0.015(-1.63)

    Observations 15 15 15 15

    R2

    0.293 0.167 0.858 0.400R-bar

    20.100 -0.060 0.801 0.160

    * 10% significance level

    ** 5% significance level

    *** 1% significance level

    39

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    40/45

    Table 12 Recession Amplitudes with and without large financial events.

    P-T RGNP

    Amplitude, 20th

    credit M2 Stock

    With crunch 10.4% 14.8% 15.2%

    Without crunch 3.8% 2.9% 2.8%

    t-statistic 0.98 1.57 1.34

    P-T RGNPAmplitude, 19th

    credit M2 Stock

    With crunch 7.1% 6.9% 5.4%

    Without crunch 0.1% -0.7% 0.8%

    t-statistic 1.83** 3.12** 0.94

    t-tests for equal mean with unequal variances.*significant at 10% level

    **significant at 5% level

    ***significant at 1% level

    40

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    41/45

    41

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    42/45

    -15

    -10

    -505

    10

    15

    20

    25

    18

    75

    18

    80

    188

    5

    18

    90

    18

    95

    19

    00

    19

    05

    19

    10

    19

    15

    Log

    change

    Rea

    lGNP

    Comm

    erc

    ialban

    ks

    loans

    M2

    Source:Balke

    &G

    ordon,

    NBER,

    FederalReserve

    Board,

    FDIC,

    Fried

    m

    an

    &S

    chw

    artz,

    Authors

    calculations

    012345678910 7

    5

    0

    5

    0

    5

    0

    5

    0

    5

    0

    0.0

    0

    0.2

    5

    0.5

    0

    0.7

    5

    1.0

    0

    1.2

    5

    1.5

    0

    Percen

    t

    Ra

    ilroa

    d

    bon

    d

    sprea

    d(

    rightsca

    le)

    Com

    m

    erc

    ialpaper

    ra

    te

    (leftsca

    le)

    Percen

    t

    -35

    -25

    -15

    -55

    15

    25

    35

    45

    19

    20

    19

    25

    19

    30

    19

    35

    19

    40

    19

    45

    19

    50

    19

    55

    19

    60

    19

    65

    19

    70

    19

    75

    19

    80

    19

    85

    19

    90

    19

    9520

    00

    20

    05

    Log

    change

    Rea

    lGNP

    Com

    m

    erc

    ialbank

    sloans

    M2

    Source:Balke

    &G

    ordon,

    NBER,

    FederalReserve

    Board,

    FDIC,

    Friedm

    an

    &S

    chwartz,

    Authors

    calculations

    0246810

    12

    14

    0

    5

    0

    5

    0

    5

    0

    5

    0

    5

    7 0

    7 5

    0

    5

    0

    5

    0

    5

    Percen

    t

    Baa

    bon

    d

    sprea

    d

    Discoun

    tra

    te

    Figure1

    42

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    43/45

    43

    012345678910

    11

    12

    18

    75

    18

    80

    188

    5

    18

    90

    18

    95

    19

    00

    19

    05

    19

    10

    19

    15

    19

    20

    Source:

    Stan

    dar

    d

    an

    d

    Po

    or

    s

    S&P

    500

    index

    In

    dex,

    Logar

    ithm

    icsca

    le

    110

    100

    1000

    10000

    19

    20

    19

    25

    19

    30

    19

    35

    19

    40 1

    94

    519

    50

    19

    55

    19

    60

    19

    65

    19

    70

    19

    75

    19

    80

    19

    85 1

    990

    19

    95

    20

    00

    20

    05

    Source:Standard

    &P

    oors

    S&P5

    00

    index

    Index,

    Logarit

    hm

    icscale

    Figure1

    continued

    020

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    220

    1

    1

    1

    2 1

    3 1

    4 1

    5 1

    6 1

    7 1

    1

    1

    1

    Rea

    lHPI

    In

    dex

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    44/45

    44 -0.10

    -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15 -

    0.10

    -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    BLS

    Data

    RGNPvs.RR

    Spread(1800s)

    RGNPcontraction

    RR

    sp

    readcontraction

    93

    07

    13

    -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    RGNPvs.

    M2(1800s)

    RGNPcontraction

    93

    07

    13

    -0.10

    -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15 -

    0.20

    -0.12

    -

    0.04

    0.04

    0.12

    0.20

    0.28

    BLSData

    RGNPvs.CP(1800s)

    CPcontraction

    RGNPcontraction -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    RGNPvs.Stocks(1800s)

    RGNPcontraction

    93

    07

    13

    93

    07

    13

    Figure2

  • 7/29/2019 Bordo Credit Market Turmoil

    45/45

    50

    -2.00

    -1.50-

    1.00

    -0.50

    0.00

    0.50

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    NPvs.BaaSpread(1900s)

    Baaspreadcontraction

    45

    20

    37

    -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    0.30

    0.35

    0.40 -

    1.00

    0.00

    1.00

    2.00

    3.00

    4.00

    5.00

    BLSData

    RGNP

    vs.Discount(19

    00s)

    Discountratecontraction

    RGNPcontraction

    45

    29

    20

    37

    RGNPv

    s.M2(1900s)

    45

    29

    20

    3

    7

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    0.30

    0.35

    0.40

    RGN

    Pvs.Stocks(190

    0s)

    RGNPcontraction

    45

    29

    20

    37

    Figure3