cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and ...scripties.umcg.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/files/root/... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
“CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN GOUT”
Patterns of cardiovascular dysfunction in patients with chronic gout
Student: M.S Stob
Student number: 1721275
E-mail: [email protected]
Location: Department of Cardiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Supervisor:
L.J. Wagenaar, MD, PhD, Cardiologist, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede.
E-mail: [email protected]
External Supervisor:
E.O.F van Gorselen, MD, Cardiologist, Slingeland Ziekenhuis, Doetinchem
E-mail: [email protected]
In cooperation with:
H.E. Vonkeman, MD, PhD, Rheumatologist, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede.
E-mail: [email protected]
M.S. Stob Page 2
Summary (½ A4)
Dutch Uit recente onderzoeken is gebleken dat mensen met jicht een verhoogd risico op
cardiovasculaire ziekte hebben. Jicht is een veelvoorkomende ziekte, met name onder
mannen, die gekarakteriseerd wordt door recidiverende ontstekingen van gewrichten. Eén van
de theorieën is dat chronische ontstekingen artherogenese en thrombogenese bevorderen. Met
behulp van cardiale beeldvormende technieken als echo en MRI hopen wij patronen te kunnen
vinden van subklinische cardiovasculaire dysfunctie. 10 mannen met intermitterende of
chronische jicht en minimaal verhoogd cardiovasculair risicoprofiel zijn geïncludeerd.
Daarvan hebben 6 personen zowel MRI als echo ondergaan en 1 persoon alleen MRI.
Gebruikelijke echografische parameters ter analyse van de systolische functie van de linker
ventrikel lieten vrijwel normale waarden zien. Opmerkelijk was wel dat 83.3% een
afwijkende diastolische functie liet zien, in totaal hadden 66.6% graad 1 en 16.6% graad 2
diastolische dysfunctie. Alle personen met diastolische dysfunctie hadden tevens een vergroot
linker atrium. Dit is hoger dan de normale prevalentie (29.8%) van diastolische dysfunctie
onder gezonde proefpersonen in dezelfde leeftijdscategorie. Gezien de zeer kleine
onderzoeksgroep is het onmogelijk te zeggen of de duur van de klachten, aantal aangedane
gewrichten en het wel of niet aanwezig zijn van tophi van invloed zijn op de kans op
diastolische dysfunctie. MRI liet geen afwijkende waarden zien, met name geen aanwijzingen
op oedeem of littekenweefsel in het myocard. Dit onderzoek laat zien dat er een verhoogde
prevalentie van diastolische dysfunctie is bij personen met intermitterende of chronische jicht.
Verder onderzoek is noodzakelijk om deze uitkomsten te toetsen. Prospectief onderzoek met
langdurige follow-up kan bijdragen aan de theorie dat jicht een onafhankelijke risicofactor is
voor diastolische dysfunctie.
English Recent studies have shown an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk amongst patients with gout.
Gout is a common worldwide disease, particularly amongst men, characterized by recurrent
arthritis. Most accepted theory for the increased CV risk amongst patients with gout is the
impact of chronic inflammation, which may promote atherogenesis and thrombogenesis.
Using cardiac imaging such as echocardiogram and cardiac MRI (CMR), we hope to
distinguish patterns of subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction. 10 men with intermittent or
chronic gout and a minimal increased cardiovascular risk profile were included. 6 participants
underwent both CMR and echocardiogram, 1 subject only had CMR. Usual
echocardiographic parameters used for analysis of left ventricle (LV) function showed normal
values. Remarkable, diastolic function was impaired in 83.3% of all participants,
accompanied by enlargement of the left atrium. A total of 66.6% showed grade I and 16.6%
showed grade II diastolic dysfunction. These percentages are higher than the normal
prevalence (29.8%) of diastolic dysfunction amongst a healthy population in the same age-
group. Because of the small study population it is impossible to say if the onset of symptoms,
number of affected joints or the presence of tophi are of influence on the chance to develop
diastolic dysfunction. CMR showed no abnormal parameters, especially no signs of edema or
scarring in the myocardium. This study shows an increased prevalence of diastolic
dysfunction in male patients with intermittent or chronic gout. Further research is needed to
test these findings. Prospective studies with long follow-up can be useful to contribute to the
concept of gout as an independent risk factor for diastolic dysfunction.
M.S. Stob Page 3
Table of Contents
Summary (½ A4) ........................................................................................................................ 2
Dutch .................................................................................................................................. 2
English ................................................................................................................................ 2
Introduction on Gout .................................................................................................................. 5
Incidence and prevalence ................................................................................................... 5
Pathophysiology and etiology ............................................................................................ 5
Risk Factors .................................................................................................................... 5
Classification .................................................................................................................. 5
Clinical presentation ....................................................................................................... 6
Symptoms ....................................................................................................................... 6
Diagnostic criteria .......................................................................................................... 6
Treatment ........................................................................................................................ 6
Problem definition ...................................................................................................................... 8
Cardiovascular risk ............................................................................................................. 8
Cardiac imaging ............................................................................................................... 10
Echocardiography ......................................................................................................... 10
Magnetic resonance imaging ........................................................................................ 12
Atherosclerosis ............................................................................................................. 12
Aim of the study ........................................................................................................... 12
Research questions ....................................................................................................... 12
Hypothesis .................................................................................................................... 12
Material & Methods ................................................................................................................. 14
Study population .............................................................................................................. 14
Demographics and medical data ................................................................................... 14
Cardiac Imaging ............................................................................................................... 15
Echocardiography ......................................................................................................... 15
Cardiac MRI ................................................................................................................. 15
Results ...................................................................................................................................... 17
Patient population ............................................................................................................. 17
Patient characteristics ....................................................................................................... 18
Echocardiography ............................................................................................................. 19
LV function .................................................................................................................. 19
M.S. Stob Page 4
LV diastolic function .................................................................................................... 19
LA function .................................................................................................................. 19
RV function .................................................................................................................. 19
Anatomy ....................................................................................................................... 19
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging ............................................................................... 21
LV function .................................................................................................................. 21
RV function .................................................................................................................. 21
Anatomy ....................................................................................................................... 21
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 23
Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 24
References ................................................................................................................................ 26
Appendices ............................................................................................................................... 34
1. Drugs that raise and lower serum urate concentrations ......................................... 34
2. Echo parameters ..................................................................................................... 35
3. MRI parameters ..................................................................................................... 36
M.S. Stob Page 5
Introduction on Gout
Incidence and prevalence Gout is a common worldwide disease which can be very disabling. Over the past decades gout
has become more common across the entire world, including China, Polynesia, New Zealand
and urban sub-Saharan Africa (1-4). However the incidence and prevalence are difficult to
determine precisely because of the short and recurrent nature of the attacks of gouty arthritis
(5,6). The prevalence of gout in Dutch general practice is about 17 per 1000 patients (7),
which is similar to the prevalence of 1-2 percent in international literature and is more
common amongst men (3-4:1)(1,8). There are indications of an increase in incidence of gout
among Western populations (1,9-11). This can most likely be explained by increasing
longevity (1), higher percentages of obesity, and rise in prevalence of hypertension and
metabolic syndrome (12), which are all associated with gout (1,13). Along with the increase
in hypertension, a rise in prescriptions of diuretics might lead to an increase in the prevalence
of gout, since diuretics are highly associated with gout (14).
Pathophysiology and etiology Gout is the generic term for conditions which are characterized by periods of severe joint
inflammation with the presence of crystallized uric acid, called monosodium urate (MSU)
crystals, in the affected joints, bones and/or soft tissues. The precise correlation between the
deposition of these MSU crystals and the joint inflammation is not fully known. The
commonly accepted concept is that the body shows an auto-immune reaction against these
MSU crystals. Through absorption of the crystals by macrophages, a pro-inflammatory
cytokine called interleukin-1β is formed. Subsequently this leads to the production of
chemokines and inflammatory mediators, which in turn attracts leukocytes and which
eventually lead to a painful and/or chronic inflammation.
Researchers found a clear correlation between increased concentration of serum uric acid and
the prevalence of gout (1). In most cases this is caused by an abnormal increase in
reabsorption of uric acid in the kidneys (15-17). In most of the other cases the increase in uric
acid is caused by an increased production of uric acid as a result of breaking down purine
nucleotides such as RNA, DNA and ATP (16,17).
Risk Factors
Multiple risk factors are associated with the development of gout arthritis. These are divided
in two groups: non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors. Non-modifiable risk factors are:
male gender, increased age, postmenopausal status and ethnicity. Modifiable risk factors are:
obesity, hypertension, use of thiazide or loop diuretics and other medication (see appendix 1),
purine-rich meals like meat and seafood, beverages containing alcohol (mainly beer and
distilled liquors) or beverages high in fructose like soft drinks and fruit juice.
Classification
Gout is classified in primary and secondary gout, depending on the cause of the
hyperuricemia. Primary hyperuricemia is when an increase in serum urate is not caused by a
disease or by medication that has a positive influence on the production or an inhibitory effect
excretion of uric acid.
Secondary hyperuricemia is defined as an increase in serum urate caused by increased
production or impaired excretion due to a disease, medication, diet or toxin.
M.S. Stob Page 6
Clinical presentation
The clinical presentation of gout is divided in 3 clinical syndromes; acute gouty arthritis,
intercritical gout and chronic recurrent or tophaceous gout. After an acute gouty arthritis,
patients sometimes proceed to the intercritical stadium, a variable time period between
recurrent attacks which is usually asymptomatic. If untreated, this intercritical stadium will
progressively become shorter and attacks will recur more often until deformities, bone erosion
or tophi occur.
Symptoms
A typical gouty attack is limited to one joint in 85-90 percent of the cases (18), with the first
metatarsophalangeal joint being most often affected. Furthermore, a gouty arthritis attack has
a typical acute onset, prolongs for 2 to 5 days and has the characteristics of an inflammatory
reaction, with pain, redness, heat, swelling and dysfunction of the affected joint or joints.
After an asymptomatic period a second attack often occurs within 6 months to 2 years.
Figure 1: Deposits of uric acid (tophi) in the helix of the ear (left) and within the skin overlying the finger joints (right)
(19).
Diagnostic criteria
There are a lot of conditions which may mimic the clinical features of an acute gouty attack,
like septic arthritis, pseudogout, trauma or other crystal deposition arthritis. A definitive
diagnosis must exclude the previous named conditions to support the perhaps lifelong
treatment.
The golden standard for the diagnosis of gout is the identification of MSU crystals in the
synovial fluid from an affected joint during an acute gouty attack or from a punctate from a
tophus.
Sometimes it is necessary to maintain a tentative diagnosis, for example with a negative
outcome from a joint aspiration. The tentative diagnosis of gout can be based on clinical
(symptoms, previous episodes) and biochemical criteria and perhaps medical imaging.
Researchers found these findings less specific and hard to apply in the general practice, so
they made a risk calculator which general practitioners can use to predict the 3-years
probability of gout (20).
Treatment
The treatment of gout depends on the clinical presentation of the patient and is divided in
acute treatment and chronic treatment.
M.S. Stob Page 7
Acute attacks The goals of acute treatment is to relieve pain and stop the inflammatory reaction. Most
effective and applicable medications are colchicine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAID) and corticosteroids (19). Medication should be started as soon as possible after the
onset of symptoms to get the best results. When the symptoms are gone, it is recommended to
discontinue the medication. NSAID’s are preferred above colchicine when there are no
contra-indications. In severe conditions, NSAID’s and colchicine can be combined. Recently,
intra-articular corticosteroids have been proven to be effective (21). However, this is mostly
used in refractory cases or in case of severe contra-indications. Researchers are currently
finding promising results from anti-IL-1 medication (canakinumab) for the treatment of acute
gouty arthritis when NSAID’s, corticosteroids or colchicines are out of option (19,22).
Besides medication, resting and cooling of the affected joint helps with recovery (23).
Chronic treatment Primary goal of chronic treatment is to prevent recurrence, thus preventing the complications
of chronic gout (figure 2). Frequently, allopurinol is used to accomplish this by reducing
serum levels of uric acid, preventing the formation of monosodium urate and dissolve the
already present crystals deposits (tophi). Long term follow-up of patients is recommended
with regular control of uric acid and other influencing factors like osteoarthritis, comorbid
conditions or co-medication. Just as in acute treatment, in chronic treatment research is still
ongoing and shows new and promising developments (24). Due to a high prevalence of
comorbidities known for increasing cardiovascular disease, it is advised to keep this in mind
while treating chronic gout. Therefore management of other risk factors, like hypertension,
diabetes, hyperlipidemia and obesity is recommended.
Figure 2: Complications of chronic gout (19)
Complications of chronic gout
Tophi and soft tissue damage
Erosive bone damage
Renal disease o Uric acid calculi o Chronic urate nephropathy o Acute uric acid nephropathy
(usually secondary to chemotherapy)
Disability and work absence
Avascular necrosis of the femoral head.
M.S. Stob Page 8
Problem definition
Cardiovascular risk Over the past decades it was shown that patients diagnosed with hyperuricemia or gout have
an increased risk of CV disease (25-29). This was first shown in 1988 in a large prospective
cohort study (30), and the latest review by Agabiti&Grassi states: “hyperuricemia and gout
have been identified as independent risk factors for the development and progression of CV
disease, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality in a variety of populations” (31). There is also a
correlation between the levels of hyperuricemia and the prevalence and severity of coronary
disease in non-gout populations. (32-34).
Analyses in several studies showed an increased prevalence of traditional CV risk factors,
including hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking habits and obesity among patients with gout
compared to patients without gout (27,35-41). The correlations found between hyperuricemia
and diabetes have been contradictory (42). Most importantly, apart from an increase in CV
co-morbidity, hyperuricemia is also correlated with an increase in all-cause and CV disease
mortality (43-51). Hyperuricemia is associated with an average 1.5-1.7 fold risk of death by
CV disease, including myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke (26,52). Niskanen et al.
showed that higher levels of serum uric acid increases the risk of death from CV disease and
all-cause death (53). After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors and variables commonly
associated with gout, they showed an increased relative risk factor of 3,73 for the upper third
vs the lower third serum uric acid (figure 3 and table 2). Women with hyperuricemia appear to
have a higher relative risk of death from CV disease than men (54,55).
A larger and more recent retrospective cohort study (n=151,018) showed an adjusted hazard
ratio of 1.10 (95% CI 1.07-1.13) for CV mortality, corrected for gender, age, smoking habits,
alcohol related diseases, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and atrial fibrillation (52).
So we can say the increased prevalence of traditional CV risk factors among gout populations
can only partly explain the increased risk of CV disease and mortality.
Keeping this in mind, there might be other pathophysiological mechanisms for the increased
risk of CV mortality among patients with gout or hyperuricemia.
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier hazard curves for cardiovascular (a) and all-cause (b) mortality for serum uric acid
categorized into tertiles. (53)
M.S. Stob Page 9
Table 1: Risk of death from CVD and any cause during the 11-year follow-up for serum uric acid levels categorized
into tertiles in 1423 middle-aged men. (53)
Mechanism
Several theories about potential mechanisms have been formed by professionals trying to
explain the observed increased CV death in patients with gout. Already established is that
hyperuricemia is associated with CV disease, although it remains unclear whether the
hyperuricemia itself plays a pathogenic role or if hyperuricemia can only be seen as a marker
for associated CV risk factors (56,57).
Independently of serum uric acid levels, one of the possible explanations for this increase in
CV disease is ongoing low-grade inflammation among patients with gout, may promote
atherogenesis and thrombogenesis. This hypothesis is based upon findings which suggest that
atherosclerosis itself, the main cause of acute coronary syndrome, is an inflammatory disease
(58,59). This has already been suggested in other chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases
associated with higher CV disease risks, like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or systematic lupus
erythematodes (SLE) (60,61). Recently RA has been included as an independent risk factor
for CV diseases in the guidelines for Dutch general practitioners (7). Other chronic
inflammatory rheumatic diseases like SLE and Bechterew (ankylosing spondylitis) have not
been included. However, practitioners must be aware of increased incidence of CV diseases
within these patient population (58).
Gouty arthritis can vary in frequency from once to several times a year, there are indications
that gout not only affects the joints but may also have a systemic inflammatory component
(62). The notion of a systemic inflammatory component in gout is based on several findings
showing urate crystals causing neutrophil- and platelet activation, which in turn release
cytokines, acute-phase proteins, chemokines and adhesion molecules, which could eventually
causes CV damage (63-65). Even in the intercritical periods, low-grade inflammatory activity
is still found in the synovial fluid of gout patients (66,67).
Researchers also found an association between hyperuricemia and several inflammatory
markers (e.i. CRP, IL-6, neutrophils, leucocytes and TNF-alpha (68-71) which further
contribute to the idea that inflammatory processes in patients with gout may play a role in the
development of atherosclerosis. The combination of both systemic inflammation and joint
inflammation might reinforce each other to increase CV risk (72).
M.S. Stob Page 10
Within both the hyperuricemic and the gout population there is 2-3 times higher incidence of
heart failure(73-75), which is associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality and hospital
utilization. Interestingly, among people with HF, hyperuricemia differed significantly between
patients with and without an ischemic etiology (76). Moreover, hyperuricemia is associated
with an increased relative risk in mortality (77) and might be used as prognostic marker (78).
Cardiac imaging Cardiac imaging could be useful to detect signs of subclinical cardiac and/or CV dysfunction
in patients with long term gout. CMR has significantly been improved the past couple of years
and it’s applicability’s is still in development. Although CMR has such an impressive quality
of imaging, CMR has never been used to evaluate cardiac dysfunction in the gout population
thus far.
Echocardiography
Until now only a few studies performed echocardiography among patients with hyperuricemia
and gout. Looking at hyperuricemia, Krishnan et al. describes significant differences at
multiple parameters such as LV thickness, LV diastolic internal dimension and LV mass,
comparing highest and lowest serum uric acid quartile. They also found a multivariable-
adjusted odds ratio of 9.01 for abnormal LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and 4.58 for LV
systolic dysfunction, comparing highest and lowest serum uric acid quartile (79). Regarding
gout, Krishnan et al described significant difference between patients with or without gout.
Multiple echocardiographic parameters such as LV thickness, LV diastolic internal
dimension, LV mass, systolic function and ejection fraction were significantly impaired in
patients with gout. In addition to previous findings they found a relative risk of 3.6 and 3.7
for respectively systolic dysfunction and abnormally low ejection fraction (74).
One of the parameters which is interesting among the gout population to evaluate is diastolic
dysfunction. Diastolic dysfunction is described as impaired relaxation of the left ventricle
causing problems with the filling of the left ventricle. After a certain amount of time this will
cause stiffness of the LV wall, thus increasing left atrial pressure. Diastolic dysfunction is
associated with several diseases which have a high prevalence within the gout population,
such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM) and kidney failure (Figure 4). Diastolic function
is of clinical significance because it is associated with incident heart failure after adjustment
for age, hypertension, diabetes and coronary artery disease with a hazard ratio of 1.81 (95%
CI, 1.01-3.48)(80).
Figure 4: causes of diastolic LV-dysfunction (81)
Causes of diastolic LV-dysfunction
Coronary disease
Hypertension
Valvular abnormalities
Cardiomyopathy
Diabetes mellitus
Systemic diseases
Kidney failure
M.S. Stob Page 11
A few associations between hyperuricemia and diastolic dysfunction have been described.
Elevated uric acid levels are associated with diastolic dysfunction in patients with Chronic
Heart Failure (CHF) (76) and even has a correlation with LV diastolic dysfunction amongst
patients without CHF (82,83).
Cicoira et al. described a correlation between serum uric acid levels and several
echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function (E max, E/A ratio, DtE and A-A’), this
was only analysed in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (76). Tavil et al. compared
echocardiographic parameters of LV anatomy, systolic and diastolic function amongst
patients with hypertension and compared those with and without hyperuricemia. Results
showed significant differences in the isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), tissue Doppler-
derived isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT-m) and the LV-myocardial performance index.
Furthermore they also found significant correlations between serum uric acid levels and other
echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function (E/A ratio & deceleration time) (83).
Therefore patterns of subclinical diastolic dysfunction in CMR might be present within the
gout population. As far as we know, there are no publications on valvular abnormalities or
pericardial disease among patients with gout.
Figure 5: Doppler criteria for classification of diastolic function(84).
M.S. Stob Page 12
Magnetic resonance imaging
Even though CMR probably still has its best years to come, CMR is already considered a
powerful tool to assess ventricular function, cardiac morphology, perfusion, viability, and
metabolism, as well as the vasculature. Particularly the sensitivity of CMR in defining cardiac
volumes, cardiac mass and the detection of previous ischemia can be of use in this study.
Up and coming within CMR is the possibility to measure previous mentioned diastolic
function. All of this imaging is possible without the need for ionizing radiation, and with high
resolution in three dimensions.
Atherosclerosis
The relationship between atherosclerosis and CV events is well known. However, to
determine the extent of atherosclerosis and the risk of cardiovascular events it is probably best
to visualize arterial plaques. There are multiple imaging techniques to do this. Most
commonly non-invasive techniques used are Computed Tomography (CT) and ultrasound.
Within the hyperuricemic population, researchers have used both techniques to see if there is
any relation between hyperuricemia and the presence of arthrosclerosis.
One of the markers for arthrosclerosis using CT is called Coronary Artery Calcification
(CAC). It has a positive correlation with the degree of coronary plaque (85,86) and is an
independent marker for the risk of coronary disease(87,88). Researchers found an independent
association between hyperuricemia and the presence and severity of calcification.
Hyperuricemic patients have a three times increased risk of presence and increased severity of
coronary calcification (89-91).
Carotid intima media thickness (IMT) is another marker for arthrosclerosis using ultrasound.
Like CAC this marker has a predictive value for clinical events (92,93). A positive association
is found between hyperuricemia and carotid IMT in both men and woman (94-99). One recent
study also found a significant difference in carotid IMT between patients with gouty attacks
and asymptomatic hyperuricemia (100). Furthermore, Ukurova noticed a trend that patients
with gout have a greater risk of subclinical atherosclerosis than patients with rheumatoid
arthritis (100).
Aim of the study
We wanted to find and describe patterns of CV dysfunction in patients diagnosed with gout
with a relative low prior probability of cardiovascular disease using CMR and
echocardiography.
To assess CV dysfunction, different variables will be scored including wall motion score,
diastolic function, valvular abnormalities, left and right ventricular ejection fraction, left
ventricular mass and presence of myocardial fibrosis.
Research questions
Because of the unique features and design of this study and the first time using CMR in
patients with gout the question we want to answer is:
Can we identify patterns of CV dysfunction using CMR and echocardiography in patients
diagnosed with gout with a relative low prior probability of cardiovascular disease?
Hypothesis
All findings stated in the problem definition contribute to the idea that despite the intermittent
nature, gout could play a chronic role in atherosclerosis, increasing CV risk (101). Even
though the increased CV risk is well researched within the gout population, besides CAC and
M.S. Stob Page 13
carotid IMT few studies have been performed using cardiac imaging techniques among the
gout population. Especially the contribution of CMR has not been researched so far. We
expect to find an increased prevalence of dysfunction in CV variables, especially diastolic
function, in this small cohort of gout population.
M.S. Stob Page 14
Material & Methods
Study population Patients were selected using a diagnosis specific code, from a large cohort of patients
(currently containing over 3000 patients) attending the outpatient department of the Arthritis
Center Twente of the University Twente & Medisch Spectrum Twente hospital group in
Enschede. Details on the methods of patient inclusion and data collection have been
previously published (102). Briefly, as part of routine clinical care, data are collected,
including traditional CV risks parameters used in the SCORE and PROCAM risk set, disease
duration, radiographic scores, extra-articular manifestations, ESR, hs-CRP and specific
medications. Patients are subsequently followed up to a first cardiovascular event or death.
Inclusion criteria gout patients Patients with crystal proven gouty arthritis and a maximum of one of the following
cardiovascular risk factors were invited to participate:
Smoking
Hypercholesterolemia/dyslipidemia (total serum cholesterol ≥ 6.5 mmol/l)
Hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90
mmHg) or current use of antihypertensive medication
Exclusion criteria gout patients Previous CV disease
Age < 18 or > 75 years
Pregnancy
Kidney dysfunction (GFR < 60 ml/min)
Diabetes mellitus (fasting glucose level ≥ 7.0 mmol/l) or current use of anti-diabetic
medication
Body Mass Index > 30 kg/m2
Claustrophobia or other exclusion criteria for MRI, such as implanted metal materials
Demographics and medical data
Baseline data had already been collected in the Arthritis Center Twente Cardiovascular
Disease cohort (ACT-CVD) of the University Twente & Medisch Spectrum Twente hospital
group in Enschede.
Demographic and patient data include:
Demographics, including age, gender, family history of CV disease and smoking
habits
Medical history, including onset of symptoms, year of proven gouty arthritis, arterial
hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, previous CV or cerebral events,
kidney failure and other co-morbidities.
Current medication
Body Mass Index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart frequency
Laboratory testing: total cholesterol, triglycerides, high density lipoprotein, low
density lipoprotein and serum uric acid (maximum and last known).
M.S. Stob Page 15
Cardiac Imaging
Echocardiography
An echocardiogram was performed in all patients. Multiple parameters were measured in all
groups: LV ejection fraction, presence of wall motion abnormalities, diastolic function,
presence of valvular disease, right ventricle (RV) function and presence of cardiomyopathy.
See Appendix 2 for an overview of the echocardiographic parameters.
Research protocol echocardiography Echocardiography was performed, using a Philips iE33 xMATRIX Ultrasound system
machine (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). Final interpretation of the images and
measurements was done by two investigators (EvG, LJW).
Conventional two dimensional echocardiograms were acquired in the parasternal long axis
and short axis, apical four-chamber, apical two-chamber, apical long axis and subcostal
views. Colour tissue Doppler images were acquired in parasternal and apical views. M-mode
echocardiograms were acquired at the level of the left atrium and aortic valve, the mitral valve
and tips of the mitral leaflets. Tissue Doppler images were acquired from the left ventricle in
the apical view. Tissue Doppler signals from septal, lateral, inferior and anterior LV-wall and
the lateral RV-wall will be recorded. For each wall, the basal and mid-segments will be
recorded. Measurements will be done for left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT) diameter, peak
mitral E and A wave velocities with and without Valsalva maneuver, systolic aortic velocity
and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), pulmonary venous inflow (left atrial pressure wave:
A-Ar interval) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE).
Three dimensional echocardiograms acquired to obtain a full volume 3D dataset.
Measurements from this dataset of end systolic and end diastolic volumes done to derive
stroke volume and ejection fraction.
When applicable, measurements are corrected for body surface area (BSA).
LV analysis performed according to the guidelines of the European Association of
Echocardiography (103). LV function was defined as normal, mildly, moderately or severely
impaired. Wall motion scores scored using the 17 segment model (104). Valvular disease was
classified as none, mild, moderate or severe, according to the guidelines of the European
Association of Echocardiography(105). Diastolic dysfunction was classified as none or grade
I to III (84).
Using the wall motion score, patients were scored as normal LV-function (1 or 0
abnormalities), one vessel disease or multivessel disease.
In case of ventricular dysfunction, patterns of cardiomyopathy were scored in three
categories, dilated cardiomyopathy (diffuse abnormalities without regional differences),
ischemic cardiomyopathy (regional wall abnormalities) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
(wall thickness > 15 mm). When there is presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, the pattern
of hypertrophy will be scored as concentric or asymmetric.
Valvular calcification was scored as absent or present. Grading of stenosis of regurgitation
was classified as mild, moderate or severe.
Cardiac MRI
A CMR was performed in all patients. Multiple parameters were measured in all groups: LV
and RV systolic and diastolic dimension, LV and RV ejection fraction, LV mass, wall motion
abnormalities and presence of fibrosis. See appendix 3 for an overview of the CMR
parameters. To detect possible myocardial fibrosis it is important to perform contrast imaging
during this investigation, as this offers the unique possibility of tissue characterization.
M.S. Stob Page 16
Research protocol Cardiac MRI CMR examination was performed on a 1.5-T whole body scanner (Achieva scan, Philips
Medical System, Best, The Netherlands) using commercially available CMR software. For
signal-reception a five-element cardiac synergy coil was used. Electrocardiogram triggering
will be done with a vector-electrocardiogram-set-up. Subjects were examined in the supine
position. Morphologic images in the cardiac short axis, four chamber long axis, three
chamber, and two chamber long axis, and left ventricular outflow tract views were acquired
by using fast field echo cine images (slice thickness 8.0mm; repetition time 3.4ms; echo time
1.7ms; flip angle 60°; matrix 256×256).
Subsequently, a breath-hold, black-blood, T2-weighted double-inversion recovery sequence
with a fat-saturation pulse was performed in 8-10 short-axis slices, covering the base, mid and
apex of the heart, with the following parameters: repetition time 1800-2400ms; echo time
80ms; matrix 256x256; field of view 32-40cm; slice thickness 12mm; number of excitations
1. Myocardial scar was assessed on contrast enhanced multislice short-axis, long-axis, and
four chamber views, obtained approximately 10 minutes after intravenous bolus injection of
0.5 mmol gadoteric acid (gadoterate meglumine) per kilogram body weight (Dotarem ®,
Guerbet SA, Villepinte, France). A three-dimensional Turbo Field Echo-inversion recovery
T1-weighted sequence was used with the following parameters: repetition time 4.0ms; echo
time 1.3ms; flip angle 15°; inversion time individually optimized to null myocardial signal
(usually between 180-250ms); matrix 157; slice thickness 10 mm.
Cine imaging was used to determine volumes (end-systolic and end-diastolic) and LV mass
and LV mass index. Cardiac output was defined as (end-diastolic volume minus end-systolic
volume) x heart rate. Ejection fraction was defined as stroke volume/end-diastolic volume.
RV ejection fraction was determined in the same way as LV ejection fraction.
Regional wall motion abnormalities were scored using the 17 segment model.
LV mass was calculated by substracting the endocardial border tracings of the LV from the
epicardial border tracings and were compared with reference values adjusted to age and sex.
Percentages of fibrosis and patterns will be determined.
LV geometry and function: Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV and
ESV; ml), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; %), and end-diastolic wall mass (EDWM;
g) were calculated from contiguous short-axis loops by segmentation of endocardial and
epicardial borders on each frame. Papillary muscles was regarded as part of the ventricular
cavity.
The left ventricular wall regions were divided into 17 segments according to a standardized
myocardial segmentation model. Wall motion was assigned the following scores: normal wall
motion is 0, hypokinesia 1, severe hypokinesia 2, akinesia 3, and dyskinesia 4. The wall
motion score index (WMSI) was calculated by dividing the sum of scores in each segment by
the total number of observed segments. WMSI of 0 was considered as normal, 0-1 as
moderate, 1-2 as poor, and >2 as bad.
At the end of the research protocol delayed enhancement, 10minutes after Gadolineum-
injetion, was acquires to search for infarction or fibrosis. The infarcted myocardium is defined
as the zone of hyper-enhancement on the contrast enhanced (CE) images, in contrast with the
dark-gray signal of the normal myocardium. New techniques to determine diastolic function
will be used such as left atrium transit time (LATT) and E/A ratio of LV and RV inflow.
Contraindications to cardiac MRI included mobile implanted metallic devices, reported
metallic particles in eye, exposure to metalworking or welding in past without available skull
radiographs, renal insufficiency and claustrophobia.
M.S. Stob Page 17
Results
Patient population
For this present sub study we were able to include a total of 10 patients over a 5 month period
between June 2013 and October 2013. No adverse events occurred during the study period.
Using the long-term gout specific diagnosis code, a total of 660 patients, both male and
female were identified for further screening. After age exclusion a total of 490 patients were
screened for eligibility. Patients with an age >75 were not screened for comorbidities. After
applying both in- and exclusion criteria of the remaining patients, only 2 female and 90 male
patients were potentially eligible. Table 2 shows the numbers and percentages of patients who
met exclusion critera. In 18% of all cases, patients met more than one of the exclusion criteria.
Table II shows the total amount of exclusion criteria met by excluded patients, including those
who were excluded because they met more than one criteria. DM, glomerular filtration rate
(GFR) <60, >1 risk factor, body mass index (BMI) >30 and previous cardiovascular event
(CVE) were the main reasons for exclusion. The other reasons for exclusions were contra
indications, non-punctate proven gout, non-sufficient information or other causes (for
example; psychiatric conditions and terminal malignancies).
Table II. Reasons to exclude subjects from participating
Reason n %
Contra indication
29
5,90%
Diabetes 81 16,50% GFR<60 72 14,70% >1 risk factor 81 16,50% BMI>30 78 15,90% CVE 98 20,00% NPP 43 8,80% <information 18 3,70% Other 11 2,20%
Data are expressed as numbers (%). GFR. glomerular filtration rate; RF, risk factor; BMI, body mass index; CVE, cardiovascular event; NPP, not punctate proven.
Invitations to enroll this study were sent by the rheumatic research department of the Medisch
Spectrum Twente (MST). Patients were not randomly selected. The patients without any
comorbidity were invited in the first place to preserve the healthiest population. Only 10
invitations at the same time were allowed to be in circulation, because no more than 10 spots
were available for research. A total of 16 invitations were sent before we had 10 responders.
One patient was excluded after responding, he had gained weight and therefore had a
BMI>30. Due to troubles with the logistics during the holiday season not all patients
underwent both examinations yet. So far, 6 patients underwent an echocardiography and
CMR. One subject only underwent cardiac CMR.
M.S. Stob Page 18
Patient characteristics
The median age of the studied population was 61.5 years (IQR 53.8-67.8). All patients
included were male. Due to the strict in- and exclusion criteria the prevalence of co-morbidity
was very low. None of the studied population was obese, 6 subjects were overweight. There
were no current smokers. Only 3 patients met the criteria of hypertension when measured at
one of the 2 examinations. 30% had a positive familial history. 80% of the patients obeyed
their restrictive diet of alcoholic consumptions. 2 patients used cholesterol-lowering
medication, 100% had a normal to slightly elevated cholesterol but still below the 6,5 mmol/l
mark. The median last known serum uric acid was 0.29 mmol/l (IQR 0.20-0.33). For some of
the patients the maximum serum uric acid could be underreported, some of their data was not
present before they already used serum acid lowering medication. Still the median remained
0.56 mmol/L (IQR 0.51-0.60). Most of the patients had oligoarticular gout (70%), only 1
(10%) had polyarticular gout. 40% of the patients had current signs or a history of tophi, only
1 patient had radiographic signs of erosion due to gouty attacks. The median time since onset
of symptoms and the median time since punctate proven diagnosis were 8 years (IQR 7-10)
and 2.5 years (IQR 1-6) respectively.
Table III. Clinical characteristics of study population
Parameter Median (IQR) or N(%)
Age (years) 61.5 (53.8-67.8)
Male sex 10 (100%)
BMI (kg/m2) 27 (25-27)
Smoking 0 (0%)
SBP (mm Hg) 138 (128-145)
DBP (mm Hg) 79 (76-87)
Alcohol (units per week)
<10 8 (80%)
10-20 1 (10%)
>20 1 (10%)
Cholesterol (mmol/L) 5.4 (4.8-5.7)
Triglycerides (mmol/L) 2.2 (0.7-2.5)
HDL (mmol/L) 1.3 (1.2-1.4)
LDL (mmol/L) 2.9 (2.8-3.6)
Maximum serum uric acid (mmol/L) 0.59 (0.53-0.60)
Last known S-uric acid (mmol/L) 0.29 (0.20-0.33)
Familial history 3 (30%)
Symptom duration (years) 8 (7-10)
Time since diagnosis (years) 2.5 (1-6)
Affected joints
Monoarticular 2 (20%)
Oligoarticular 7 (70%)
Polyarticular 1 (10%)
Tophi 4 (40%)
Erosion 1 (10%)
Continuous data are expressed as median (25%-75% interquartile range) and categorical as number (%). BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.
M.S. Stob Page 19
Echocardiography
A total of 6 participants underwent echocardiography so far. Some parameters could not be
measured due to poor signal. In one exam biplane parameters (LV end systolic dimensions
and LV diastolic dimensions) could not be measured and another exam showed an incomplete
3D examination, these outcomes were not included in table III.
LV function
LV ejection fraction in 2D echocardiography was slightly impaired in 66% (n=4) of the
participants, although LV dimensions in 2D echocardiography showed almost no
abnormalities. There was one subject whose end diastolic volume (EDV) and end systolic
volume (ESV) were respectively moderate and severely abnormal. 3D echocardiography did
not show any impaired LV ejection fraction, nor did it show any abnormalities in LV
dimensions. It is remarkable that the dimensions from 3D echocardiography were a lot lower
than the 2D echocardiographic dimensions.
LV diastolic function
According to 2D echocardiography, 83% (n=5) showed some form of diastolic dysfunction.
66.6% of the participants (n=4) had grade I diastolic dysfunction and 1 participant (16,6%)
had grade II diastolic dysfunction. The time since onset of symptoms was no longer among
the subjects with diastolic dysfunction compared to the subjects without diastolic dysfunction.
All subjects with diastolic dysfunction had either oligoarticular arthritis or polyarticular
arthritis and just one was diagnosed with topheus gout.
Amongst participants with diastolic dysfunction grade I, 2 out of 4 showed a prolonged
deceleration time. Isovolumetric relaxation time was abnormal in 4 out of 5 participants with
diastolic dysfunction. At first glance, table IV shows no abnormal values for diastolic
dysfunction. However this table shows all participants joined together. The subjects who had
diastolic dysfunction grade I had a median E/A ratio of 0,83 which is impaired as expected.
LA function
When we look at the left atrium (LA), 83.3% (n=5) of all subjects had an increased LA
volume when corrected for BSA with a median (IQR 25%-75%) of 31.1 (29.2-33.8). 33.3%
(n=2) of all subjects had an moderate increased LA volume index (LAVI >34 ml/m2) and
50% (n=3) showed a mildly increased LA volume index (LAVI 28<34 ml/m2). 3D
echocardiography however showed normal LA volumes corrected for BSA, reference range
<28 ml/m2 according to the American association of echocardiography (103). It is important
to remember this threshold was based on 2D measurements.
RV function
Valvular or annulus calcification was present in 50% (n=3) of the subjects. All three of the
subjects had diastolic dysfunction. Two of them had grade I diastolic dysfunction and one had
grade II diastolic dysfunction. The subject with grade II diastolic dysfunction also had a mild
aortic valve stenosis. Median RV basal diameter is 3.6, which is moderately abnormal (103).
A total of 66,6% (n=4) of the subjects had an enlarged RV basal diameter, 2 were moderately
abnormal and 2 were severely abnormal.
Anatomy
Anatomical analysis showed normal IVSd, LVIDd, LVPWd and LV mass/BSA in both
subjects with and without diastolic dysfunction.
M.S. Stob Page 20
Table IV. Echocardiographic parameters of study population Parameters Median (IQR 25%-75%)
LV function
2D EF (%) 53.8 (51.8-53.8)
2D EDV (ml) 137.3 (126.9-138.0)
2D ESV (ml) 61.2 (54.0-63.5)
2D SV (ml) 73.8 (65.7-90.5)
3D EF(%) 58.9 (57.7-59.3)
3D EDV (ml) 88.7 (79.2-106.4)
3D ESV (ml) 36.5 (34.1-39.4)
3D SV (ml) 52.2 (45.1-67.0)
Diastolic function E (cm/s) 62.3 (58.7-77.6)
E/A 0.9 (0.8-1.1)
IVRT (sec) 0.08 (0.06-0.09)
Dec time (sec) 0.19 (0.15-0.22)
e’ (lateral) (cm/s) 13.9 (11.7-15.1)
e’ (septal) (cm/s) 8.5 (8.0-9.7)
PV S/D ratio 1.4 (1.2-1.5)
PV A max (cm/s) 23.4 (20.7-25.1)
PV A dur (sec) 0.11 (0.11-0.13)
Grade (no, %)
Normal 1 (16,6%)
I 4 (66.6%)
II 1(16,6%)
III 0 (0%)
LA function LAVI (ml/m
2) 31.1 (29.2-33.8)
3D EDV (ml) 29.4 (28.3-33.1)
3D ESV (ml) 8.4 (8.1-10.5)
3D SV (ml) 20.2 (18.9-24.8)
3D EF(%) 69.0 (64.3-71.4)
RV function Diameter, basal (cm) 3.6 (3.0-3.8)
RV S’ (cm/s) 14.7 (13.0-15.8)
TAPSE (cm) 2.7 (2.6-3.0)
Anatomy IVSd (cm) 1.1 (1.0-1.2)
LVIDd (cm) 4.8 (4.4-5.2)
LVPWd (cm) 0.94 (0.85-0.97)
LV mass index (g/m
2) 88.6 (83.7-93.6)
LVOT area (cm
2) 4.1 (4.1-4.9)
Continuous data are expressed as median (25%-75% interquartile range) and
categorical as number (%). EF, ejection fraction; EDV, end diastolic volume; ESV, end systolic volume; SV, stroke volume; E, mitral peak velocity of early filling; E/A, ratio
between the early mitral peak velocity and the late mitral peak velocity; IVRT, isovolumetric relaxation time; Dec time, deceleration time; e’, mitral annulus tissue velocity; PV S/D, ratio between systolic and diastolic pulmonary vein velocity, PV A
max, maximum end diastolic pulmonary vein velocity; PV A dur, duration of end diastolic pulmonary vein flow; LAVI, left atrial volume index; RV S’, velocity of tricuspid anular systolic motion; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; IVSd, diastolic
intraventricular septal thickness; LVIDd, diastolic left ventricular internal dimension; LVPWd, diastolic left ventricular posterior wall dimension; LVOT, left ventricular
outflow tract.
M.S. Stob Page 21
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
A total of 7 participants underwent CMR. Appendix 3 shows the parameters we examined in
preformed CMR’s. Some experimental scans were performed but not yet examined.
LV function
The LV function on 2 patients (28,6%) was impaired although their LV volumes were not
particularly abnormal. LV mass corrected for BSA was lower than reference values in both
patients, however this was the case in a total of 3 participants (42.9%). Cardiac index
however was clearly lower in both patients compared to the other participants. In total 2
patients (28.6%) showed an impaired cardiac index.
RV function
Right ventricular function was within normal borders in all participants. Overall, RV volumes
were of normal value, except the RV EDV was slightly impaired in 2 participants (28,6%)
Anatomy
Wall motion score, delayed enhancement, edema and the anatomy of the great vessels were
normal in all patients.
Table V. Cardiac MRI parameters of study population
Parameters Median (IQR 25%-75%)
LV function
EF (%) 61.2 (54.6-62.4)
EDV (ml) 150.0 (132.1-161.6)
EDV/BSA (ml/m
2) 70.2 (68.2-80.7)
ESV (ml) 62.4 (46.6-68.7)
ESV/BSA (ml/m
2) 30.5(22.9-34.6)
SV (ml) 80.0 (72.8-106.4)
LV mass/BSA (g/m
2) 43.6 (40.7-50.0)
RV function
EF (%) 56.6 (53.3-58.2)
EDV (ml) 167.8 (130.8-170.0)
EDV/BSA (ml/m
2) 75.0 (62.9-86.2)
ESV (ml) 61.8 (56.1-79.3)
ESV/BSA (ml/m
2) 32.3 (25.8-38.9)
SV (ml) 89.2 (75.4-102.5)
Continuous data are expressed as median (25%-75% interquartile range). (%). EF, ejection fraction; EDV, end diastolic volume; ESV, end systolic volume; SV, stroke volume; BSA, body surface area; LV, left ventricular; RV, right ventricular.
M.S. Stob Page 22
Figure 3. Cardiac imaging from one patient. a) Black blood sequence, short axis. b) cine image, short axis. c) delayed
enhancement sequence, no delayed enhancement is visible.
M.S. Stob Page 23
Conclusion
The main finding of this study is a high prevalence of 83.3% in impaired diastolic function in
patients with intermittent or chronic gout. Overall, this small study group showed relatively
normal echocardiographic parameters of LV systolic function, RV function and anatomy.
Cardiac MRI did not show any remarkable abnormalities on LV or RV function, nor did
cardiac MRI showed signs of edema or scarring. The impact from several characteristics such
as time since onset of symptoms, the presence of mono-, oligo- or polyarthritis, the presence
of calcification, regurgitation or stenosis, nor the presence of tophi and erosions on x-ray
could be evaluated in such small study population.
M.S. Stob Page 24
Discussion
This study is the first study which performed cardiac MRI and echocardiography on patients
with gout, to find out if there are any leads on finding patterns of CV dysfunction. Some
studies analyzed correlations for echocardiographic parameters amongst patients with
hypertension or heart failure who also happened to have hyperuricemia, but none amongst
gout. Unfortunately none of them described the prevalence of subjects actually having
diastolic dysfunction, only the parameters of diastolic function. None of the previous studies
explicitly researched diastolic dysfunction among subjects with just hyperuricemia or gout. So
it is not possible to make a good comparison between previous performed studies and the
results of this study.
We tried to exclude as many confounders as possible by only allowing ≤1 traditional risk
factor so only the effect of gout with/without current hyperuricemia will be examined and
therefore exclude any comorbidities influencing on diastolic function like hypertension or
chronic heart failure.
The main finding of this study is an increased percentage of diastolic function in this small
group of patients with intermittent or chronic gout. So far, systolic function looked relatively
normal compared to healthy subjects. Kane et al. studied diastolic function in a healthy
subgroup, these 531 participants were without hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease,
heart failure or use of cardiovascular medication (80). In this healthy subgroup the prevalence
of diastolic dysfunction was 11.9% at examination and 29.8% at examination 2 after a 4 year
follow up, showing age-related increase in diastolic dysfunction. Previous studies already
described an increased prevalence in impaired parameters of diastolic function in subjects
with hyperuricemia (76,82,83). This study shows a prevalence of 83,3% in a small group with
gout and low CV risk. With extreme caution we could say intermittent or chronic gout can be
associated with an increased prevalence of diastolic dysfunction.
We also saw a high prevalence of atrial dilatation. The theory behind this is that impaired
relaxation of the left ventricle will cause problems with the filling of the left ventricle. After a
certain amount of time this will cause stiffness of the LV wall and eventually chronic volume
overload of the left atrium. After a long time of increased left atrial pressure, this eventually
will cause atrial dilatation.
Krishnan et al described significant anatomical differences such as LV thickness, LV diastolic
internal dimension, LV mass, systolic function and ejection fraction between subject with the
highest levels of serum uric acid and subjects with low levels of serum uric acid(79). They did
not described if these subjects actually had dilated atria, left ventricular hypertrophy or an
impaired ejection fraction.
We excluded subjects with a high risk for cardiovascular disease and subjects who already
had an cardiovascular event, so the probability of finding signs of myocardial infarction in
CMR was low. Therefore we weren’t surprised none of the subjects showed any delayed
enhancement, abnormal wall motion score or edema on CMR, nor did we expect any
cardiovascular events during the study, which did not occur.
This study contributes to the already performed studies in favor for the association between
hyperuricemia/gout and cardiovascular disease. The high prevalence of diastolic dysfunction
M.S. Stob Page 25
does contribute to the hypothesis that gout is not just a local inflammation but there also plays
a systemic role, which impairs the cardiac vasculature and therefore impairs cardiac function.
We have to consider the possibility of a publication bias that over-represents study results in
favor of the association between hyperuricemia and cardiovascular disease (106).
The main limitation of this study was the very small sample size of subjects, this was because
it was a subgroup of the entire CAMERA population. A study being performed at the moment
to find patterns of CV dysfunction in subjects with RA using both echocardiography and
CMR. Also logistic problems caused a delay in the time between enrolling subject and
actually performing echocardiography and CMR. Therefore no hard conclusions could be
made with the results provided. However it did show a high prevalence in diastolic
dysfunction amongst this subgroup with gout.
Other limitations of this study were the lack of comparison in time, there were no subjects
with a recent onset of first symptoms so we could not really compare the effect of time of
symptoms and the grade of diastolic function. Also we did not knew if subject already had
some form of diastolic dysfunction previous at the onset of their gouty arthritis.
In addition to the already performed cardiac imaging in this study, coronary CT could be
performed to compare the coronary artery calcification with the subjects who showed
diastolic dysfunction.
For the future more research is needed to establish the relation between gout and
cardiovascular disease. Regarding cardiac imaging, diastolic function parameters in MRI has
yet to be validated and standardized. Prospective studies, studying echo parameters amongst
patients with acute, intermittent and chronic gout with long follow-up could be useful for
evaluating the impact of gout on diastolic function in time.
M.S. Stob Page 26
References
(1) Saag K, Choi H. Epidemiology, risk factors, and lifestyle modifications for gout. Arthritis
research therapy 2006;8 Suppl 1:S2-S2.
(2) Darmawan J, Rasker J, Nuralim H. The effect of control and self-medication of chronic
gout in a developing country. Outcome after 10 years. J Rheumatol 2003;30(11):2437-2443.
(3) Klemp P, Stansfield S, Castle B, Robertson M. Gout is on the increase in New Zealand.
1997;56(1):22-26.
(4) Miao Z, Li C, Chen Y, Zhao S, Wang Y, Wang Z, et al. Dietary and lifestyle changes
associated with high prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout in the Shandong coastal cities of
Eastern China. J Rheumatol 2008;35(9):1859-1864.
(5) Schlesinger N. Response to application of ice may help differentiate between gouty
arthritis and other inflammatory arthritides. Journal of clinical rheumatology 2006;12(6):275-
276.
(6) Lawrence R, Felson D, Helmick C, Arnold L, Choi H, Deyo R, et al. Estimates of the
prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis
rheumatism 2008;58(1):26-35.
(7) Janssens HJEM, Lagro HAHM, Van Peet PG, Gorter KJ, Van der Pas P, Van der Paardt
M†, et al. NHG-standaard Artritis. Huisarts Wet 2009;52(9):439-453.
(8) Janssens HJEM. Behandeling van jicht. Geneesmiddelenbulletin 2010 05-10;44(10):109-
115.
(9) Arromdee E, Michet C, Crowson C, O'Fallon WM, Gabriel S. Epidemiology of gout: is
the incidence rising? J Rheumatol 2002;29(11):2403-2406.
(10) Terkeltaub R. Clinical practice. Gout. N Engl J Med 2003;349(17):1647-1655.
(11) Choi H, Curhan G. Gout: epidemiology and lifestyle choices. Curr Opin Rheumatol
2005;17(3):341-345.
(12) Go A, Mozaffarian D, Roger V, Benjamin E, Berry J, Borden W, et al. Executive
summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart
Association. Circulation 2013;127(1):143-152.
(13) Choi H, Atkinson K, Karlson E, Curhan G. Obesity, weight change, hypertension,
diuretic use, and risk of gout in men: the health professionals follow-up study. Arch Intern
Med 2005;165(7):742-748.
(14) McAdams DeMarco, Mara Maynard, Janet Baer, Alan Gelber, Allan Young, J H
Alonso,Alvaro Coresh, Josef. Diuretic use, increased serum urate levels, and risk of incident
M.S. Stob Page 27
gout in a population-based study of adults with hypertension: the Atherosclerosis Risk in
Communities cohort study. Arthritis & rheumatism 2012;64(1):121-129.
(15) Choi H, Mount D, Reginato A. Pathogenesis of gout. Ann Intern Med 2005;143(7):499-
516.
(16) Jacobs JW, Bijlsma JW. [Gout: current aspects of etiology, diagnosis and therapy]. Ned
Tijdschr Geneeskd 1996;140(4):187-191.
(17) Teng G, Nair R, Saag K. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatment of gout.
Drugs 2006;66(12):1547-1563.
(18) Richette P, Bardin T. Gout. Lancet (London, England) 2010;375(9711):318-328.
(19) Jordan K, Cameron JS, Snaith M, Zhang W, Doherty M, Seckl J, et al. British Society for
Rheumatology and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology guideline for the
management of gout. Rheumatology 2007;46(8):1372-1374.
(20) Janssens HJEM, Fransen J, van de Lisdonk EH, van Riel,Piet L C M., van Weel C,
Janssen M. A diagnostic rule for acute gouty arthritis in primary care without joint fluid
analysis. Arch Intern Med 2010;170(13):1120-1126.
(21) Janssens, H J E M Lucassen, P L B J Van de Laar, F A Janssen, M Van de Lisdonk,E H.
Systemic corticosteroids for acute gout. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2008(2):CD005521-CD005521.
(22) Schlesinger N. Canakinumab in gout. Expert opinion on biological therapy
2012;12(9):1265-1275.
(23) Schlesinger N, Detry M, Holland B, Baker D, Beutler A, Rull M, et al. Local ice therapy
during bouts of acute gouty arthritis. J Rheumatol 2002;29(2):331-334.
(24) Grassi D, Ferri L, Desideri G, Di Giosia P, Cheli P, Del Pinto R, et al. Chronic
hyperuricemia, uric acid deposit and cardiovascular risk. Curr Pharm Des 2013;19(13):2432-
2438.
(25) Choi H, Curhan G. Independent impact of gout on mortality and risk for coronary heart
disease. Circulation 2007;116(8):894-900.
(26) Kuo C, See L, Luo S, Ko Y, Lin Y, Hwang J, et al. Gout: an independent risk factor for
all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Rheumatology 2010;49(1):141-146.
(27) Zhu Y, Pandya B, Choi H. Comorbidities of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general
population: NHANES 2007-2008. Am J Med 2012;125(7):679-687.e1.
(28) Kim SY, De Vera MA, Choi HK. Gout and mortality. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008;26(5
Suppl 51):S115-S119.
M.S. Stob Page 28
(29) Chen, Shih-Yang Chen,Ching-Lang Shen, Ming-Lai. Severity of gouty arthritis is
associated with Q-wave myocardial infarction: a large-scale, cross-sectional study. Clin
Rheumatol 2007;26(3):308-313.
(30) Abbott RD, Brand FN, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Gout and coronary heart disease: the
Framingham Study. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41(3):237-242.
(31) Agabiti Rosei E, Grassi G. Beyond gout: uric acid and cardiovascular diseases. Curr Med
Res Opin 2013;29 Suppl 3:33-39.
(32) Rich MW. Uric acid: is it a risk factor for cardiovascular disease? Am J Cardiol
2000;85(8):1018-1021.
(33) Kivity S, Kopel E, Maor E, Abu Bachar F, Segev S, Sidi Y, et al. Association of serum
uric acid and cardiovascular disease in healthy adults. Am J Cardiol 2013;111(8):1146-1151.
(34) Shah A, Keenan R. Gout, hyperuricemia, and the risk of cardiovascular disease: cause
and effect? Curr Rheumatol Rep 2010;12(2):118-124.
(35) Janssens HJEM, van de Lisdonk EH, Bor H, van den Hoogen,H J M., Janssen M. Gout,
just a nasty event or a cardiovascular signal? A study from primary care. Fam Pract
2003;20(4):413-416.
(36) Sundström J, Sullivan L, D'Agostino R, Levy D, Kannel W, Vasan R. Relations of serum
uric acid to longitudinal blood pressure tracking and hypertension incidence. Hypertension
2005;45(1):28-33.
(37) Hikita M, Ohno I, Mori Y, Ichida K, Yokose T, Hosoya T. Relationship between
hyperuricemia and body fat distribution. Internal medicine 2007;46(17):1353-1358.
(38) Edwards NL. The role of hyperuricemia in vascular disorders. Curr Opin Rheumatol
2009;21(2):132-137.
(39) Kansui Y, Ohtsubo T, Goto K, Sakata S, Ichishima K, Fukuhara M, et al. Association of
serum uric acid with blood pressure in Japanese men. Cross-sectional study in work-site
group. Circulation Journal 2011;75(12):2827-2832.
(40) Loeffler L, Navas Acien A, Brady T, Miller E, Fadrowski J. Uric acid level and elevated
blood pressure in US adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-
2006. Hypertension 2012;59(4):811-817.
(41) Lottmann K, Chen X, Schädlich P. Association between gout and all-cause as well as
cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2012;14(2):195-203.
(42) Bandaru P, Shankar A. Association between Serum Uric Acid Levels and Diabetes
Mellitus. International journal of endocrinology 2011;2011:604715-604715.
(43) Milionis HJ, Kalantzi KJ, Goudevenos JA, Seferiadis K, Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf MS.
Serum uric acid levels and risk for acute ischaemic non-embolic stroke in elderly subjects. J
Intern Med 2005;258(5):435-441.
M.S. Stob Page 29
(44) Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis D, Tziomalos K, Sileli M, Savvatianos S, Kakafika A, et al.
Serum uric acid as an independent predictor of early death after acute stroke. Circulation
Journal 2007;71(7):1120-1127.
(45) Meisinger C, Koenig W, Baumert J, Döring A. Uric acid levels are associated with all-
cause and cardiovascular disease mortality independent of systemic inflammation in men
from the general population: the MONICA/KORA cohort study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc
Biol 2008;28(6):1186-1192.
(46) Strasak A, Ruttmann E, Brant L, Kelleher C, Klenk J, Concin H, et al. Serum uric acid
and risk of cardiovascular mortality: a prospective long-term study of 83,683 Austrian men.
Clin Chem 2008;54(2):273-284.
(47) Kim S, Guevara J, Kim K, Choi H, Heitjan D, Albert D. Hyperuricemia and risk of
stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis rheumatism 2009;61(7):885-892.
(48) Kim S, Guevara J, Kim K, Choi H, Heitjan D, Albert D. Hyperuricemia and coronary
heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Research 2010;62(2):170-
180.
(49) Silbernagel G, Hoffmann MM, Grammer TB, Boehm BO, März W. Uric acid is
predictive of cardiovascular mortality and sudden cardiac death in subjects referred for
coronary angiography. NMCD.Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
2013;23(1):46-52.
(50) Nam G, Lee K, Park Y, Cho K, Lee S, Ko B, et al. An increase in serum uric acid
concentrations is associated with an increase in the Framingham risk score in Korean adults.
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2011;49(5):909-914.
(51) Chen, Jiunn-Horng Chuang, Shao-Yuan Chen, Hsin-Jen Yeh,Wen-Ting Pan, Wen-Harn.
Serum uric acid level as an independent risk factor for all-cause, cardiovascular, and ischemic
stroke mortality: a Chinese cohort study. Arthritis & rheumatism 2009;61(2):225-232.
(52) Kok V, Horng J, Lin H, Chen Y, Cheng K. Gout and subsequent increased risk of
cardiovascular mortality in non-diabetics aged 50 and above: a population-based cohort study
in Taiwan. BMC cardiovascular disorders 2012;12:108-108.
(53) Niskanen L, Laaksonen D, Nyyssönen K, Alfthan G, Lakka H, Lakka T, et al. Uric acid
level as a risk factor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in middle-aged men: a
prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2004;164(14):1546-1551.
(54) Dawson J, Jeemon P, Hetherington L, Judd C, Hastie C, Schulz C, et al. Serum Uric Acid
Level, Longitudinal Blood Pressure, Renal Function, and Long-Term Mortality in Treated
Hypertensive Patients. Hypertension 2013.
(55) Kawai T, Ohishi M, Takeya Y, Onishi M, Ito N, Yamamoto K, et al. Serum uric acid is
an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality in hypertensive patients.
Hypertension research 2012;35(11):1087-1092.
M.S. Stob Page 30
(56) Oparil, Suzanne Zaman,M A Calhoun, David. Pathogenesis of hypertension. Ann Intern
Med 2003;139(9):761-776.
(57) Johnson, Richard Kang, Duk-Hee Feig, Daniel Kivlighn, Salah Kanellis, John Watanabe,
Susumu Tuttle, Katherine Rodriguez Iturbe, Bernardo Herrera Acosta,Jaime Mazzali,
Marilda. Is there a pathogenetic role for uric acid in hypertension and cardiovascular and renal
disease? Hypertension 2003;41(6):1183-1190.
(58) Hansson G. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med
2005;352(16):1685-1695.
(59) Kanellis J, Kang D. Uric acid as a mediator of endothelial dysfunction, inflammation,
and vascular disease. Semin Nephrol 2005;25(1):39-42.
(60) Krishnan E, Baker J, Furst D, Schumacher HR. Gout and the risk of acute myocardial
infarction. Arthritis rheumatism 2006;54(8):2688-2696.
(61) Wong M, Toh L, Wilson A, Rowley K, Karschimkus C, Prior D, et al. Reduced arterial
elasticity in rheumatoid arthritis and the relationship to vascular disease risk factors and
inflammation. Arthritis rheumatism 2003;48(1):81-89.
(62) Tausche A, Manger B, Müller Ladner U, Schmidt B. [Gout as a systemic disease.
Manifestations, complications and comorbidities of hyperuricaemia]. Zeitschrift für
Rheumatologie 2012;71(3):224-230.
(63) Boogaerts MA, Hammerschmidt DE, Roelant C, Verwilghen RL, Jacob HS. Mechanisms
of vascular damage in gout and oxalosis: crystal induced, granulocyte mediated, endothelial
injury. Thromb Haemost 1983;50(2):576-580.
(64) Chapman PT, Yarwood H, Harrison AA, Stocker CJ, Jamar F, Gundel RH, et al.
Endothelial activation in monosodium urate monohydrate crystal-induced inflammation: in
vitro and in vivo studies on the roles of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1.
Arthritis rheumatism 1997;40(5):955-965.
(65) Kang D, Park S, Lee I, Johnson R. Uric acid-induced C-reactive protein expression:
implication on cell proliferation and nitric oxide production of human vascular cells. Journal
of the American Society of Nephrology 2005;16(12):3553-3562.
(66) Pascual E. Persistence of monosodium urate crystals and low-grade inflammation in the
synovial fluid of patients with untreated gout. Arthritis & rheumatism 1991;34(2):141-145.
(67) Krishnan E, Svendsen K, Neaton J, Grandits G, Kuller L. Long-term cardiovascular
mortality among middle-aged men with gout. Arch Intern Med 2008;168(10):1104-1110.
(68) Fröhlich M, Imhof A, Berg G, Hutchinson WL, Pepys MB, Boeing H, et al. Association
between C-reactive protein and features of the metabolic syndrome: a population-based study.
Diabetes Care 2000;23(12):1835-1839.
(69) Ruggiero C, Cherubini A, Ble A, Bos AJG, Maggio M, Dixit V, et al. Uric acid and
inflammatory markers. Eur Heart J 2006;27(10):1174-1181.
M.S. Stob Page 31
(70) Coutinho TdA, Turner S, Peyser P, Bielak L, Sheedy P, Kullo I. Associations of serum
uric acid with markers of inflammation, metabolic syndrome, and subclinical coronary
atherosclerosis. American journal of hypertension 2007;20(1):83-89.
(71) Lyngdoh T, Marques Vidal P, Paccaud F, Preisig M, Waeber G, Bochud M, et al.
Elevated serum uric acid is associated with high circulating inflammatory cytokines in the
population-based Colaus study. PLoS ONE 2011;6(5):e19901-e19901.
(72) Alderman M. Podagra, uric acid, and cardiovascular disease. Circulation
2007;116(8):880-883.
(73) Krishnan E. Hyperuricemia and incident heart failure. Circulation.Heart failure
2009;2(6):556-562.
(74) Krishnan E. Gout and the risk for incident heart failure and systolic dysfunction. BMJ
open 2012;2(1):e000282-e000282.
(75) Robinson P, Merriman T, Herbison P, Highton J. Hospital admissions associated with
gout and their comorbidities in New Zealand and England 1999-2009. Rheumatology
2013;52(1):118-126.
(76) Cicoira M, Zanolla L, Rossi A, Golia G, Franceschini L, Brighetti G, et al. Elevated
serum uric acid levels are associated with diastolic dysfunction in patients with dilated
cardiomyopathy. The American heart journal 2002;143(6):1107-1111.
(77) Harzand, Arash Tamariz,Leonardo Hare, Joshua. Uric acid, heart failure survival, and the
impact of xanthine oxidase inhibition. Congestive heart failure 2012;18(3):179-182.
(78) Kaufman MG, Maya. Uric acid in heart failure: a biomarker or therapeutic target? Heart
Fail Rev 2013;18(2):177-186.
(79) Krishnan E, Hariri A, Dabbous O, Pandya B. Hyperuricemia and the echocardiographic
measures of myocardial dysfunction. Congestive heart failure 2012;18(3):138-143.
(80) Kane, Garvan Karon, Barry Mahoney, Douglas Redfield, Margaret Roger, Veronique
Burnett, John Jacobsen,Steven Rodeheffer, Richard. Progression of left ventricular diastolic
dysfunction and risk of heart failure. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association
2011;306(8):856-863.
(81) Kamp O. Hoofdstuk 7: De diastolische linkerventrikelfunctie. In: Hamer J.P.M PPG,
editor. Praktische echocardiografie Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 2004. p. 66.
(82) Hsieh M, Su H, Wang S, Tsai D, Lin S, Chen S, et al. Significant correlation between left
ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction and decreased glomerular filtration rate. Ren
Fail 2011;33(10):977-982.
(83) Tavil Y, Kaya M, Sen N, Tacoy G, Okyay K, Yazici H, et al. Assessment of left
ventricular systolic and diastolic function by tissue Doppler analysis in patients with
hypertension with or without hyperuricemia. Blood Press Monit 2008;13(2):79-84.
M.S. Stob Page 32
(84) Redfield M, Jacobsen S, Burnett J, Mahoney D, Bailey K, Rodeheffer R. Burden of
systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the
heart failure epidemic. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association
2003;289(2):194-202.
(85) Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS. Coronary artery
calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque
area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation 1995;92(8):2157-2162.
(86) Liu Y, Sun Z, Tsay P, Chan T, Hsieh I, Chen C, et al. Significance of coronary
calcification for prediction of coronary artery disease and cardiac events based on 64-slice
coronary computed tomography angiography. BioMed Research International
2013;2013:472347-472347.
(87) Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen S, Doherty T, Detrano R. Coronary artery calcium score
combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA: the
Journal of the American Medical Association 2004;291(2):210-215.
(88) Arad Y, Goodman K, Roth M, Newstein D, Guerci A. Coronary calcification, coronary
disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the
St. Francis Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46(1):158-165.
(89) Santos R, Nasir K, Orakzai R, Meneghelo R, Carvalho JAM, Blumenthal R. Relation of
uric acid levels to presence of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography
in men free of symptomatic myocardial ischemia with versus without the metabolic
syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2007;99(1):42-45.
(90) Krishnan E, Pandya B, Chung L, Dabbous O. Hyperuricemia and the risk for subclinical
coronary atherosclerosis--data from a prospective observational cohort study. Arthritis
research therapy 2011;13(2):R66-R66.
(91) Berezin, A E Kremzer,A A. Serum uric Acid as a marker of coronary calcification in
patients with asymptomatic coronary artery disease with preserved left ventricular pump
function. Cardiology research and practice 2013;2013:129369-129369.
(92) Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, Rosamond W, Szklo M, Sharrett AR, et al.
Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major
risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987-1993. Am J
Epidemiol 1997;146(6):483-494.
(93) Davis PH, Dawson JD, Riley WA, Lauer RM. Carotid intimal-medial thickness is related
to cardiovascular risk factors measured from childhood through middle age: The Muscatine
Study. Circulation 2001;104(23):2815-2819.
(94) Iribarren C, Folsom AR, Eckfeldt JH, McGovern PG, Nieto FJ. Correlates of uric acid
and its association with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis: the ARIC Study.
Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6(4):331-340.
M.S. Stob Page 33
(95) Takayama S, Kawamoto R, Kusunoki T, Abe M, Onji M. Uric acid is an independent
risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis in a Japanese elderly population without metabolic
syndrome. Cardiovascular Diabetology 2012;11:2-2.
(96) Tavil Y, Kaya M, Oktar S, Sen N, Okyay K, Yazici H, et al. Uric acid level and its
association with carotid intima-media thickness in patients with hypertension. Atherosclerosis
2008;197(1):159-163.
(97) Erdogan D, Gullu H, Caliskan M, Yildirim E, Bilgi M, Ulus T, et al. Relationship of
serum uric acid to measures of endothelial function and atherosclerosis in healthy adults. Int J
Clin Pract 2005;59(11):1276-1282.
(98) Elsayed A, Mostafa M, Abdelkhalik A, Eldeeb MEA, Abdulgani M. Hyperuricemia and
its association with carotid intima-media thickness in hypertensive and non hypertensive
patients. Journal of the Saudi Heart Association 2010;22(1):19-23.
(99) Mutluay R, Deger S, Bahadir E, Durmaz A, Citil R, Sindel S. Uric acid is an important
predictor for hypertensive early atherosclerosis. Adv Ther 2012;29(3):276-286.
(100) Ҫ ukurova S, Ünü E, Pamuk GE, Ҫ akir N. Subclinical atherosclerosis in gouty arthritis
patients: a comparative study. Rheumatol Int 2012;32(6):1769-1773.
(101) Gagliardi ACM, Miname M, Santos R. Uric acid: A marker of increased cardiovascular
risk. Atherosclerosis 2009;202(1):11-17.
(102) Meek, Inger Picavet, H Susan J Vonkeman, Harald Verschuren, W M Monique van de
Laar,Mart A F J. Increased cardiovascular risk factors in different rheumatic diseases
compared with the general population. Rheumatology 2013;52(1):210-216.
(103) Lang R, Bierig M, Devereux R, Flachskampf F, Foster E, Pellikka P, et al.
Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of
Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification
Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of
Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. Journal of the American
Society of Echocardiography 2005;18(12):1440-1463.
(104) Cerqueira M, Weissman N, Dilsizian V, Jacobs A, Kaul S, Laskey W, et al.
Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the
heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the
Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. The international journal
of cardiovascular imaging 2002;18(1):539-542.
(105) Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, Butchart E, Dion R, Filippatos G, et al. Guidelines
on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular
Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007;28(2):230-268.
(106) Gaffo, Angelo Edwards,N L Saag, Kenneth. Gout. Hyperuricemia and cardiovascular
disease: how strong is the evidence for a causal link? Arthritis research & therapy
2009;11(4):240-240.
M.S. Stob Page 34
Appendices
1. Drugs that raise and lower serum urate concentrations
Drugs that raise serum urate concentrations
Diuretics
Tacrolimus
Ciclosporin
Ethambutol
Pyrazinamide
Cytotoxic chemotherapy
Ethanol
Salicylates (low dose)
Levodopa
Ribavirin and interferon
Teriparatide
Drugs that lower serum urate concentrations
Ascorbic acid
Benzbromarone
Calcitonin
Citrate
Oestrogens
Fenofibrate
Losartan
Probenecid
Salicylates (high dose)
sulfinpyrazone
M.S. Stob Page 35
2. Echo parameters
1. LVF/EF (Biplane en 3D full volume)
a. Normal (EF ≥55%)
b. Mild (EF 45-54%)
c. Moderate (EF 36-44%)
d. Severe (EF ≤ 35%)
2. WMA (wall motion abnormalities)
a. Absent
b. Single-vessel disease
c. Multi-vessel disease
3. Diastolic function (E/A, E’, Color Doppler M-mode, IVRT, pulmonary venous
inflow, TDI, dimensions LA)
a. Normal
b. Grade I (abnormal relaxation)
c. Grade II (pseudonormal relaxation)
d. Grade III (restrictive)
4. Valvular disease
a. Calcification? Yes or no
b. Stenosis? None, mild, moderate, severe
c. Regurgitation? None, mild, moderate, severe
5. RVF (TAPSE)
a. Good > 20 mm
b. Normal 16-20 mm
c. Mild 13-15 mm
d. Moderate 10-12 mm
e. Severe <10 mm
6. Left ventricular hypertrophy
a. Absent
b. Concentric
c. Asymmetric
7. Cardiomyopathy
a. Absent
b. Dilating
c. Hypertrophic
d. Ischemic
M.S. Stob Page 36
3. MRI parameters
1. LV ESD and EDD (corrected for BSA)
a. Normal
b. Dilatation
2. LV ESV and EDV (corrected for BSA)
a. Normal
b. Increased
3. LVEF (EDD – ESD/EDD)
a. Normal
b. Abnormal
4. Cardiac index
5. RV ESD and EDD (corrected for BSA)
a. Normal
b. Dilatation
6. RV ESV and EDV
a. Normal
b. Abnormal
7. RVEF (EDD-ESD/EDD) (corrected for BSA)
a. Normal
b. Abnormal
8. LV mass (corrected for BSA)
a. Normal
b. Low
c. High
9. Wall motion score
a. Normal
b. Single vessel disease
c. Multivessel disease
10. Wall motion score index
11. Delayed enhancement (fibrosis)
a. Absent
b. Present
12. Myocardial edema
a. Absent
b. Present
13. Aspect of great vessels
a. Normal
b. Abnormal