cluster-based artificial neural network on ultrasonographic parameters for fetal weight estimation...
DESCRIPTION
Introduction Accurate estimation of fetal weight (EFW) and fetal growth rate become an important is in obstetrics. In 2008, fetal birth weight.[1] Low birth weight (less than 2.5 Kg) : 8.54% Macrosomia (equal to or more than 4 Kg) : 1.87% Low birth weight infants have high risk incidences of cerebral dysfunction. 3TRANSCRIPT
Cluster-Based Artificial Neural Network on Ultrasonographic Parameters for Fetal Weight
Estimation
Reporter : Huang Kun-Yi
From : International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.BY Yueh-Chin Cheng, Chi-Chun Hsia, Fong-Ming Chang, Chun-Ju Hou, Yu-Hsien Chiu, and Kao-Chi Chung.
Outline Introduction Material and Methods Experiments and Results Discussion
2
Introduction Accurate estimation of fetal weight
(EFW) and fetal growth rate become an important is in obstetrics.
In 2008, fetal birth weight.[1] Low birth weight (less than 2.5 Kg) :
8.54% Macrosomia (equal to or more than 4 Kg) :
1.87% Low birth weight infants have high risk
incidences of cerebral dysfunction.
3
Introduction Based on ultrasonographic parameters
(USPs), fetal weight estimation methods: Multiple regression models. Artificial neural network models. (ANN)
Large estimation error is a thorny problem in the clinical treatment for obstetricians.
The accuracy of fetal weight estimated is eagerly waiting to be improved.
4
Introduction This study proposes a cluster-based
ANN model to estimate fetal weight for different body figure.
5
System Diagram6
Material and Method7
Fetal biometric measurements were quantified by ultrasound with a 3.5 MHz convex transducer. Numerical parameters : 7 Nominal parameters : 2
Material and Method8
Parameter Abbreviation Chinese
Biparietal diameter BPD 頂骨直徑Occipitofrontal
diameterOFD 額頭直徑
Abdominal circumference
AC 腹圍Head circumference HC 頭圍
Femur length FL 股骨長度Gestational age GA 胎齡
Birth weight BW 出生重量Gender SEX 性別
Fetal presentation FP 胎兒介紹
Material and Method9
TfUfff
xxxX,,2,1
,...,,
FUUU
F
F
FFU
xxx
xxxxxx
XXXX
,2,1,
,22,21,2
,12,11,1
21
...............
...
...
,...,,
U is the total numbers of USPs.
F is the total numbers of fetal.
Material and Method10
),min(,)( FUnDSTX T
nFnnnUFU
Tffff
T
FUFU
nnn
PCPCPCxDSTX
ndiagS
,,2,1
21
,...,,ˆ)(ˆ
),...,,(
,
Use Singular value decomposition. (SVD)
K-means Method for Fetal Size Classification.
Material and Method11
Cluster-Based ANN Modeling.
Experiments and Results Estimated fetal weights and the birth
weights. Mean absolute error(MAE). Mean absolute percent error(MAPE).
12
n
i iixx
nMAE
1
1
%100ˆ1
1
n
ii
ii
xxx
nMAPE
Experiments and Results13
Cluster Train Data Test Data MAE MAPE
All 1489 638 149.4±110.2g
4.9±3.5%
I 95 40 104.5±93.6g
5.4±4.7%
II 743 319 147.1±108.4g
4.9±3.6%
III 617 264 166.2±111.2g
4.8±3.2%
IV 34 15 19.8±19.2g 2.9±2.5%
Experiments and Results14
Discussion ANN mode is trained predicting fetal
weight for each body figure cluster based on BPN algorithm and has also verified that the accuracy of fetal weight estimation of the cluster-based ANN model is genuinely preferable than those previous models.
15
Thank you for your attend~
16