csbg 2015-16 application process needs assessment, logic model, and work plan office on volunteerism...

25
CSBG 2015-16 Application Process Needs Assessment, Logic Model, and Work Plan Office on Volunteerism and Community Services, Office of Community Services January 20, 2015

Upload: haylie-woomer

Post on 16-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

CSBG 2015-16 Application Process

Needs Assessment, Logic Model, and Work Plan

Office on Volunteerism and Community Services, Office of Community Services

January 20, 2015

Application Content

1. Community Services Block Grant Application coversheet - (CSBG A-01)

2. Certification of Required Documentation - (CSBG A-02)

3. List of Grantee Board of Directors - (CSBG A-03)◦ Need to have plan for vacancies

4. Certification of Needs Assessment - (CSBG A-04)

COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION

JULY 1, 2015 TO JUNE 30, 2016 Grantee: Counties to be Served: Cities to be Served: BOARD CERTIFICATION This Community Services Block Grant Application was/will be reviewed and

approved by the Grantee's Governing Board on: .

Signature of Board Chairperson Date Typed Name of Board Chairperson:

Application Content (cont’d)

◦ 5. Budget Summary - (CSBG A-05) – 2 Tabs - Federal CSBG and TANF

◦6. Program Budget–Non-CSBG Match(CSBG A-06)

◦7. Funded Positions by Program Area -(CSBG A-07) – Federal CSBG and TANF

◦8. TANF Non-Assistance Expenditures Budget -(CSBG A-08)

Application Contents (cont’d)

◦ 9. TANF Budget Documentation Worksheet - (CSBG A-09)

◦ 10. CSBG Estimated Outcomes – (CSBG A-10) New form that matches the reporting form, insert targets

for each outcome, and outputs that feed into outcome.

◦ 11.Sub-Grant Summary Sheet – (CSBG A-11) If necessary

◦ 12. Logic Model and Workplan – (CSBG A-12)

Areas that have changed

A-04 (Cert of needs assessment)

◦Listing primary needs in each service area

Some may be same in multiple areas

Some may be needs you can’t address personally◦Needs shouldn’t match your programs 100%◦Must lead in region on finding solutions to needs (partners,

planning)

These needs will feed into the logic model

Do not focus on the #◦4 is a minimum, give a good feel for what is needed

Areas that have changed

A-10 CSBG Estimated Outcomes◦No listing of $’s per output

◦New reporting form used Added target columns

Added instruction to list (in “other” area) the outputs that feed up into outcome (the NPI)

Enables alignment (make sure outputs with correct NPI)

Able to use same form throughout

Areas that have changed

A-12 (Logic Model and Workplan)◦New addition

◦Process

Needs Assesmen

t

Logic Model Workplan

Needs Assessment reviewed for

changes next year

Logic Model reviewed, feedback given and changes

made before contract

Workplan reviewed, feedback given and

changes made before contract

Timeline

Date Action Responsible

January 21-Mar. 31 Develop Application materials

CAA (contact OVCS for assistance)

April 1 Application DueSubmit 2 hard copies, 1 electronic to OVCS

CAA

April 1 – April 20 All feedback sent by OVCS to CAA’s

OVCS

May 15 All changes made and approved by OVCS

CAA (approval by OVCS)

June 30Date depends on notification of funding

Contract preparation OVCS

Key points to consider

Needs Assessments address all needs

◦Constantly improve your processes to get the best information possible

◦Always conduct a review after to discuss strengths/weaknesses

Key Points to Consider

Logic Model preparation requires needs, operations, and measurement to complete

◦This is first year for this requirement. You will need to begin thinking about improvement to this as soon as this application is submitted. OVCS expectation will be higher next year

◦Requires input of multiple stakeholders Is it realistic, measurable, and clear?

Key points to consider

Workplan operationalizes the Logic Model

◦OVCS expectations for next year much higher

◦As detailed as you need to easily track success/challenges

◦How all needs are met (identified, may be by partners)

Logic Model

Logic Model is often confused with the work plan

◦LM is a support for planning and carrying out the plan

◦Logic Model shows Changes that occur because of your activity Connects the operation of the program to

measurable outcome

Logic Model Group Exercise

You will be given information for your group (you can create your own)

Follow the format of the Logic Model Template from left to right◦Focus on creating clear needs/problems and

giving practical but innovative steps for meeting the needs

◦Follow format◦Take the time to really discuss, and list

problems/questions you came across

Logic Model Group Exercise

Each group will report out for 3 to 5 minutes◦ We will discuss NPI matchup

These sample Logic Models will be sent out as resources to the Network

Getting to a Workplan

Needs assessment fed into Logic Model

Logic Model shows what we want to happen (the change)

Workplan is how we get there, and how we know we’ve arrived

Attachment 2 (Workplan)

Attachment 2 of the CSBG Application Instructions

◦A list of the elements expected in the Workplan

OVCS Expectations

All identified needs addressed◦ Tied to existing or new programs◦ Partners identified for those you can’t serve

Includes agreements/resources needed, or those you have and how used

Plan for building additional resources/partners

Clear, measurable, impactful outcomes◦ Outputs feed up into an outcome◦ Long-term outcomes have a review process

Specific, detailed◦ Anyone that reads this should know what you’re doing and

why

OVCS Expectations

Responsibilities assigned

Timelines for completion of elements

Who will track progress and how?◦The reports people receive, how used◦Processes for review of information◦Evaluation methods

Elements of the plan

Programs/activities/strategies

The objective of each program (outcome)◦ How it was derived◦ Specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, time-bound

Who are you targeting? How are customers identified?◦ Marketing of program (traditional, social media)

Means of measuring outcomes◦ Specific tools, people responsible◦ Types of data

Who will review it How its evaluated

◦ Concerns, things to develop

Elements of the plan

Consider using a Responsibility Chart with Timeline

◦Break down to individual tasks, person responsible, support people needed, when due

◦There will be upfront burden/work this year, but should become a regular update in future

Elements of the Plan

Individual program descriptions

◦How they fit into the agency mission

◦How they tie specifically to the outcome and the need

Ultimate requirements

All applications must have a logic model and workplan◦Feedback will be given◦CAA’s must address/respond to feedback◦Technical assistance will be available

This process should be constructive and will result in better contract documents

What is the point?

Eventual goal is that you can provide this workplan to anyone, and they can clearly know what you are doing and how

◦For our office, this will enable us to understand program needs, what we should be expecting to see in reporting, and ways to target training/additional resources

Final thoughts

Your workplan is a tool. Develop it as suchSpend appropriate time on development

◦For this year, there is an understanding that this will be a first step

Next year, your workplan should be an instructive and useful guide to all things CSBG (and CSBG-related)