daniel berchtold, head business unit rail automation, schweizer electronic

16
Increasing Safety at User Worked Crossings – How can Human Factors be Considered in a Technical Approach Daniel Berchtold Head Business Unit Rail Automation Schweizer Electronic

Upload: russell-publishing

Post on 19-Jan-2015

257 views

Category:

Automotive


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

Increasing Safety at User Worked Crossings – How can Human Factors be Considered in a Technical Approach

Daniel Berchtold Head Business Unit Rail Automation Schweizer Electronic

Page 2: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

Contents

1. Summary of relevant Human Factors on LX

2. Experience made during Swiss Trial

3. Network Rail requirements for EUWC

4. VaMoS: Technical Approach

5. Resulting safety requirements

6. How does cost influence safety?

7. Conclusion

Page 3: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

1 Human Factors on LX

Unconscious failure

– Distraction / Fatigue / Habit

– Misunderstandings

– Unclear situation / unclear indication

Conscious failure

– Violation => avoiding waiting time

– Wrong decision making => unawareness of risks

Page 4: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

2 Experience from Swiss Trial

Page 5: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

2 Experience from Swiss Trial

Red light well understood – absence of red light was not

Instructions were rarely read

Language problem

Uncertainty on persistent “Dark signal”

“No Red” was quickly associated with “No Train”

Waiting time was crucial

On-Call function was accepted/understood

Trust in system when indication clear and just-in-time

Page 6: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

3 Network Rail Requirements

Page 7: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

3 Network Rail Requirements

Minimum: Red Light & audible signal

Minimize warning time

Clear user interface / independent from user language

SIL 1

Page 8: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

4 VaMoS: Technical approach

1. Road User Interface: Red and Green light

2. Just-in-time warning: 10/20 secs

3. No instructions / unmistakable user indication

Page 9: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

4 VaMoS: Technical approach

Page 10: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

4 VaMoS: Technical approach

Road User Interface

Well known principle (code of practice) – Green: GO

– Red: STOP

– Dark: Not in operation

Broadly understood (children, foreigners)

Fail-safe principle

Audible warning

No instructions

Page 11: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

4 VaMoS: Technical approach

Train Detection

Frauscher RSR123 wheel detection – Fail-safe, reliable

– Maintenance free

– Exact train position

– Well proven

Just-in-time warning

Simple and easy to install

No interference with existing systems

Page 12: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

5 Resulting Safety Requirements

Red and especially Green light indication MUST be fail-safe

– Failed Red => increased risk for user

– Failed Green => immediate danger

– Risk based approach => SIL 3 like regular LX

Train indication and approaching time MUST be fail-safe

Much higher system availability

– Dark mode = increased risk

Automatic, reliable, remote failure indication

Page 13: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

6 How does cost influence safety ?

The lower the cost, the quicker and higher number of systems will be installed

Minimized power consumption => allows cost effective alternative power supplies

No maintenance => high maintenance cost is often an obstacle to install additional systems on a network

Page 14: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

7 Conclusion

A fail-safe and reliable system with just-in-time warning combined with an unmistakable user interface remarkable reduces risk due to human misbehaviour

Red light is associated with immediate danger rather than just “waiting time”.

Supports “safe” decision making of the road user:

Page 15: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

7 Conclusion

"Assumed" value of violation

Associated price of violation

Decision

Old Gain of time =

high value

Little risk awareness =

low price

Violation is assumed being beneficial

New No gain of time =

small value

Red light means danger =

high price

Waiting is beneficial

Page 16: Daniel Berchtold, Head Business Unit Rail Automation, Schweizer Electronic

07.03.2014

Value for Money Systems

Carefree Signalling Solutions

Questions?