daniel cornejo cisco. centros de datos unificados y su evolución hacia la nube de servicios

© 2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 1

Daniel Cornejo Reyes [email protected] Sales Specialist - Data Center


2013 2010 2007

56 Exabytes per month

12.8 Billion DVDs crossing the network





Source: Cisco Visual Networking Index


Total 500 Million

2007 1/10th of a Device per

Person on Earth

Total 35 Billion

2010 5 Devices per

Person on Earth

Total 50 Billion

2013 7 Devices per

Person on Earth

Total 500 Billion~

2020 70~ Devices per Person on Earth

Source: Forrester Research, Cisco IBSG


Reference: J. Rabaey, “A Brand New Wireless Day,” Keynote Presentation, ASPDAC Jan. 2008

Data Centers

Mobile Devices

Sensors Data Center

© 2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 5 © 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

1960 2010 2000 1970 1980 1990

Mainframe

Minicomputer

Client Server

Web

Virtualization Cloud


•  John Chambers and the Cisco executive team saw 3 trends on the horizon that would change the Data Center

1.  10Gb Ethernet 2.  X86 Evolution 3.  Virtualization


Management & Control

Primary Network

Secondary Network

Legacy Server = Application • Inefficient • Complex • High Cost • Fragile

Unified Server = Resource • Efficient • Simple • Lower cost • Agile

Unified Fabric

Wire Once and Walk Away


LAN/SAN SAN LAN

Nexus 7000

Nexus 1000V

Nexus 1010

Nexus 5000

Nexus 2000 Nexus 3000

MDS 9500

MDS 9100

MDS 9200

Nexus 4000

Cisco NX-OS: One OS from the Hypervisor to the Data Center Core

Convergence VM-Aware Networking

10 GbE switching

Fabric Extensibility

Cloud Mobility

Sca

labi

lity


More than Just Transistors

• Moore’s Law wins •  Density of transistors will double

approximately every 2 years

• Migration from RISC/Itanium/Unix to x86

•  WW shipment of x86 servers up 25.3% in Q1 2010*

•  Shipment of RISC/Itanium down 23.7% in Q1 2010*

Gordon Moore

*Gartner Study, June 2010


More Than Just Software

•  Virtualization is not new It’s just mainstream now

•  Changing the Data Center Applications now move around in the network Driving different system requirements

•  Integral piece of IT infrastructure 18.2% of all servers shipped in 2009 were virtualized* Virtualization is a top priority for x86 servers*

* IDC Report, April 2010


$0 $50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

Spending (US$B)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 60

Admin Costs Dominate Budgets

Source: IDC

New server spending Power and cooling costs Server mgmt. and admin. costs

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Physical Server Installed Base (Millions)

Logical Server Installed Base (Millions)

Virtualization = Administrative Avalanche

Operations and Maintenance Now ~80% of IT Budgets and Growing


• Unified Fabric • Common Compute Architecture • Mainstream Virtualization


Unify the Compute, Storage and Virtualization environments via The Network.

Reduces total cost of ownership

§  CAPEX: Up to 20% reduction §  OPEX: Up to 30% reduction

§  Cooling and power efficient, cost-effective scalability

Increases business agility

§  Provision applications in minutes instead of days §  Automation reduces service outages §  Just-in-time resource provisioning

Investment protection

§  Industry standards-based §  Co-exist with existing data center infrastructure

§  Leverage existing management applications via API


Mgmt Server Over the past 20 years •  An evolution of size, not thinking •  More servers & switches than ever •  More cores, more memory •  More switches per server •  Management applied, not integrated

An “accidental” architecture •  Evolved by default vs planned design

Result: Complexity •  More points of management •  More difficult to maintain policy coherence •  More difficult to secure •  More difficult to scale


Mgmt Server Mgmt Server § Embed management

§ Unify fabrics

§ Optimize for virtualization

§ Remove unnecessary switches, adapters, cables, management modules

§  Less than 1/3rd the support infrastructure for a given workload

Mgmt Server


§  A single system that encompasses: Network: Unified fabric Compute: Industry standard x86 components Capable: Optimized for virtualization

§  Efficient Scale Wire once: Nearly the same effort for 1 or 320 servers Fewer servers: More memory without more servers

§  Lower cost Fewer servers, switches, adapters, cables Less effort to install and grow Lower power consumption Fewer points of management

§  Unified management model Single point of management with unsurpassed control Dynamic resource provisioning optimized


SAN B

Mgmt SAN A LAN


Traditional Blade Server

Cisco Unified Computing System

§  40% cost savings in cabling, fiber, patch cords and labor (86% cable reduction)

§  30% more power available to servers

§  50%+ physical servers in the same space §  of power

§  Up to 4 times more virtual machines per kilowatt of power; minimum of 76 virtual machines are being deployed per kilowatt of power


Intel Xeon 5600 Processor Family

Intel Xeon 7500 Processor Family

2-Socket Servers

Extended Memory 2S Servers

4S Servers

2S Servers High Memory Small form factor

Blade Form Factor

Rack Mount Form Factor

B200 M2

B250 M2

C200 M2 C210 M2

C260 M2

C460 M1 B440 M1

B230 M1

SRE 700 / 900 SM ISR G2-Integrated

Intel Core2 Duo

C250 M2


Cisco Joins Computing’s Top Tier X

86 S

erve

r Bla

de M

arke

t Sha

re, Q

1 C

Y11

1

UCS After Two Short Years

7400 UCS Customers WW

1.1B annualized bookings run rate: +245% Y/Y

UCS momentum is fueled by game-changing innovation

Cisco is quickly passing established players in fastest growing segment of x86 computing market 2

Source: 1 IDC Worldwide Quarterly Server Tracker, Q1 2011, May 2011 2 IDC Q4 CY10 Server Forecaster


0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

% of Respondents

Gartner report: Fabric Computing Poised as a Preferred Infrastructure for Virtualization and Cloud Computing, February 11, 2011, George J. Weiss and Andrew Butler Report. ID number: G00210438. You can read the full Gartner report here: http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/cisco/210438.html

Which vendor would you perceive to be the most competent to deliver on a fabric–based strategy in your enterprise?

Dell

Egenera

HP

IBM

VMware

Other

Don’t Know/Not Sure

Cisco


Challenges in the Journey to Private Clouds

SLOW ROLL-OUT of Applications

CONSTRAINED IT Resources

POOR Operational VISIBILITY & CONTROL

UNPREDICTABLE System Integration


Private Cloud Architecture and Portfolio

Unified Data Center Infraestructure

Unified Fabric

Unified Computing

Unified Network Services

Business Application Solutions

Cisco Virtual eXperience

Infrastructure Tier-1

Business Applications

Unified Data Center Solutions

Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)

Cloud Management

Vblock FlexPod


§  Vblock Series 700 (MX) Storage: EMC Symmetrix Vmax

Compute: Cisco UCS

Virtualization: VMware

Orchestration: Unified Infrastructure Manager (UIM)

§  Vblock Series 300 (EX, FX, GX, HX) Storage: EMC VNX

Compute: Cisco UCS

Virtualization: VMware

Orchestration: Unified Infrastructure Manager (UIM)

Designed for a Broad range of Organizations


Cisco – NetApp – vmware ¡  Complete DC in one rack cabinet

¡  Base configuration supports 100, 300, 500 and 1,500 users for four popular workload applications simultaneously

– Virtual Desktop Infrastructure – Microsoft® Exchange – Microsoft SharePoint® – Microsoft SQL Server® – With headroom for multiple applications

¡  Flexibility to support multiple classes of compute and storage in a single FlexPod™

28

VMware® vSphere® vCenter®

Cisco® UCS B-Series UCS Manager

Cisco Nexus family switches Cisco 1000V

NetApp® FAS 10 GbE/FCoE

Proven, Flexible, and Future-Proof Data Center Solution


Clients

Cisco UCS Platform

Desktop Virtualization S/W VMware/Citrix

Virtualized Data Center

Cisco WAAS

Hypervisor VMware/Citrix/Microsoft

Cisco ACE

Desktop O/S

Cisco ASA

Cisco MDS9000

Family

App App Data

Storage

Unified Network Services Unified

Computing Unified Fabric

Cisco Nexus

WAN

Partner Solution Elements

§  60% greater density of virtual desktops per server blade

§  1/3 cost of networking infrastructure

§  UCS Service Profiles

§  Bandwidth optimization and Rich Media acceleration

§  Over 20% savings per seat* vs. competitors

§  Removes VDI deployment barriers

§  Combined joint partner solutions with industry leaders

§  Cisco Validated Designs & Services to accelerate customer success

Cisco Data Center Business Advantage Framework

Virtualization


VDI/VXI – Cisco virtual desktop solution

Cisco CIUS


Video Out

Keyboard/ Mouse

Virtual Desktop

Cisco Cius

HDMI

USB/BT

§  Virtual Desktop Solution

§  Lower Opex and TCO

§  Security

§  Central Managment


Other VXI Clients

Pure Hosted Remote Managed On Prem Hybrid

Customer 3

Dedicated / Private Network

Customer 1

Customer 2

Customer 4 Customer 5

Unified Communications and Collaboration

© 2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 36 36 36 36 36

Cis

co In

telli

gent

Aut

omat

ion

for C

loud

Service Catalog and Self-Service Portal newScale FrontOffice Suite

Global Orchestration & Reporting Cisco Tidal Enterprise Orchestrator

Adapter Framework

Compute Resources

Virtual Infrastructure

Network Resources

Storage Resources

OS / Software Provisioning

Cisco Tidal Server Provisioner

Virtualization Managers

eg. VMware vCenter

CMDB

IT Service Management

Tools

Clo

ud A

utom

atio

n P

ack

Billing/ Chargeback

Monitoring & Governance

Hardware Managers

eg. UCS Manager, Tivoli


•  300,000 sq ft of DC space

•  28 MW of UPS power to raised floors

•  57% servers virtualised

•  Virtualisation goal = 80%

•  300 locations in 165+ countries

•  450+ offices

•  90 data centres and server rooms

•  72,000 + employees


Leading Technologies

UCS Nexus

Operational Excellence

MVDC

Customer Friendly

Tours and displays

Resilient

Tier III

Green

PUE 1.35 Air-side economizers Rotary UPS LED lighting

Flexible

Expandable Multitenant

Allen, Texas


(1MW 10,000 sq ft)

March 2009


Resumen §  1MW UPS al piso §  12 kW/rack §  Rack de Chimeneas §  TO3R §  21 Pods

To3R §  Nexus 5000 §  Console §  Nexus 2000 Core §  Nexus 7000 §  Catalyst 6500 §  MDS Virtualización: VMWare Storage: NetApp y EMC Panduit - Emerson

March 2009


Nuevo diseño – Impacto energético utilizando Unified Computing

Diseño tradicional

Unified Fabric

Comparación

Pod Racks # Rack 135 72 63 menos Cableado Fibra 4,320 1,008 5,472 menos Cobre 2,160 Energía Centro de Datos (kW) 1,000 Almacenamiento (kW) 247 25% 21% Red Centro de Datos (kW)

186 19% 8%

Otras Redes (kW) 79 8% 8% Disponible para Servidores (kW)

488 49% 63% 129%

Ahorro ~5500 cables.

(40%. Aprox $1.1M)

~30% más energía para

servers

March 2009


Cisco IT

Tradicional Unified Fabric

UCS

DC efficiency 100% 130-150% 130% 170-200%

10,000 sq ft, 1 MW

Cableado

$2.7 millones $1.6 millones $1.6 millones

# Servidores Físicos

720 930 -1080 1,200-1,400

# Máquinas virtuales VM

7200 9,300-10,800 12,000-28,000

Mayor Eficiencia

12,000 a 28,000

máquinas virtuales

VMs – en el mismo DC

~40% Ahorro en Cableado


$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

Legacy (rackmount); all physical

Legacy; medium virtualization (54%)

Current state; 46/54% Legacy/UCS; 75%

Virtualized

Target state; 100% UCS/Cloud; 80% virtualization

IT Maintenance/ IT Innovation

70/30

TCO Virtual

Compute TCO ($/Qtr/OS instance)

Average TCO Today

-27%

-27%

Delivery Time

6 - 8 weeks (on demand ) 2 - 3 weeks

(manual ) 15 mins VM (2-9 days E2E)

15 minutes (self - service)

Updated: Q2FY11

Virtualisation> Unified Computing > Cloud


60/40


40/60


40/60


www.cisco.com/go/virtualdatacenter


Hybrid Cloud

Automation

Virtualization

Consolidation

Private Cloud

Public Cloud

Ready for the Cloud?


-27% -24% “Using the same components (processor and memory), the combination of Unified Computing, Unified I/O and Automation results in 27% savings for bare-metal and 24% for virtual offerings.”

*Silver = 50% CPU resource reservation; 75% Memory resource reservation, Includes DC Networking and SAN, excludes actual storage consumption, Based on normal discount for Legacy (3rd party) & Cisco UCS

Typical Bare-Metal Average Virtual

TCO ($/Qtr)

8 CPU core + 32 GB @ Dedicated Linux

2 vCPU core + 4 GB @ Silver* Linux

Legacy Rack Mount + Cat6k

UCS blade + Unified I/O (N7K) +

CITEIS

Legacy Rack Mount + Cat6k

UCS blade + Unified I/O (N7K) +

CITEIS

Arch and Design 135 135 135 135

Implementation 122 20 69 9

Operation 421 271 483 314

Automation - 41 - 41

Software 30 30 119 119

Equipment 2212 1723 256 200

Facility 840 507 97 59

Total 3759 2727 1160 877

Updated: Q2FY11

daniel cornejo cisco. centros de datos unificados y su evolución hacia la nube de servicios

Technology