erh studies of papaya cheese-libre

Upload: surabhiraiifs

Post on 03-Jun-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 ERH STUDIES of Papaya Cheese-libre

    1/4

    J. Adv. Sci. and Tech.,7 (l and ll), June, Dec., 2004'12'16. ISSN:0971-9563

    EQUTLIBRIUM REIATIVE HUMIDITY (ERH) STUDIES OFPAPAYA CHEESE

    SURABHI RAI, VIJAY SETHIAND K.S. JAYACHANDRANDivision of Post harvest Technology, l.A.R.l., Pusa, New Delhi - 1 10012'

    :d

    ilil

    ABSTRACT

    Measurement of water activity (aw) is important to determine theoptimum storage conditions of any product. ERH studies of papayacheese revealed optimum RH for storage was 68.3%. The criticalmoisture content of the product was 23.5 per cent having 79.6% RHand beyond this point the quality of the product deteriorated as itbecome soft, darker and mould growth began.Keywords : ERH, water activity, a*, fruit cheese.

    INTRODUCTION

    The shelf life of processed products is determined by a variety of factors that includes

    temperature, pH, relative humidity, moisture content etc. While all these factors can influence

    the chemical reactions and microbial activity water activity (aw) is one of the most critical

    factors that controlling chemical and biological spoilage of product. Thus it is important to

    determine the water activity (aw) refers to the available water in any product and is calculatedby dividing vapour pressure of solution (of solutes in water in most foods) by the vapourpressure of the solvent, usually water (Frazier and Westhoff; 1995). The water activity of a

    product can be determined from the relative humidity of the air surrounding the sample when

    the air and the sample are at equilibrium. Therefore, the sample must be in an enclosed space

    where this equilibrium can take place. Once this occurs, the water activity of the sample and

    the relative humidity or ERH. ln the present study the ERH studies of papaya cheese were

    carried out to determine the optimum storage RH to as calculate the packaging materialrequirements.

    MATERIAL AND METHODSpapaya cheese prepared as per the procedure given by Jain (1954) was used in the present

    investivation. Equilibrium relative humidity of guave cheese was determined by the weight

    equilibrium method (Wink, 1946). Two grams of cheese was weighed in small aluminiumdishes and these dishes were exposed to different relative humidities, ranging from 0-100%

    at ambient temperature. The gian or loss in weight of the product under each humidity was

    determined at 24 hours intervals. The observations were recored for product appearance'

    discolouration and presence of mold growth etc to determine the critical moisture content,

    fi

    t(I

    It

    I(

    t(

    I

    I

  • 8/12/2019 ERH STUDIES of Papaya Cheese-libre

    2/4

    I

    I

    i

    I

    i

    1.

    des

    EEI

    ncehcat

    Fto)tedlourpfahen

    FceandirereBrial

    Fgent

    pight

    niumo0%'uras[lce,[ent,

    13al. ,Aor- Sci. and Tech., 7 (l and ll), June, Dec', 2004

    danger point and ideal RH for storage. The selection of packaging materialwas done as per

    ffie required quantity of the material to be packed for a certain period of storageat a particular

    iernperature and relative humidity as per the standard procedure (Ranganna'1997)

    .REVIEW OF LITERATURE

    Products equilibrating with a relative humidity of less than 50 per cent are termed

    hygroscopic and those with relative humidity above 50 per cent are termed ashygroemmesive

    (Landrockand procter, 1951). Various considerations involved in the selection of the

    right type

    of package are the initial moisture content, ERH of the product, the critical moisture content

    above which the product becomes unusable, premissible moisturepickup' size and shape of

    the container, desirable shelf life of the product and climatic conditions prevailingduring

    storage and transport (Mulikrishna, 1964). The ERH curve for osmoticallydried papaya slices

    strowed that finat product has on ERH of 59 per cent. The water activity(aw) achieved was too

    low(0.59)forthegrowthofmicroorganisms(AhmedandChoudhari'1995)'sagarandMaini{1992) observed that the critical point and danger

    point of dehydrated guava power to be 1 1 '26

    and 8.40 percent respectively. Mould growth occurred al21'5 per cent equilibriummoisture

    content.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    The relationship between the equilibrium moisture content, number of days theproduct took

    to equilibriate at a particular relative humidity and the general condition of theproduct at

    different relative humidities for the papaya cheese is presented in Table 1 ' The initialmoisture

    content of papaya cheese was 1 7.42%.lt can be seen from the moisture equilibrium curve

    (Figure 1), that mould growth'commenced at relative humidity of 92 per cent and above'

    Aspergitus spp and Penicillium spp were found to be the predominant moulds' The critical

    moisture content of the product was 21.4 per cent having 79'6% RH and beyond thispoint the

    quality of the product deteriorated as the product became soft, darker and mould growth

    began. Danger point was less by 5% relative humidity (19.75"/"\.The optimum relative humidityfor the storage of papaya cheese was found to be 68'3%'

    The calculations (Table 2) revealed that the permeability limit (water vapour transmission)

    of the packaging material required for storage of papaya cheese was 26.42 X 10-6 cclcmzlsecl

    cm of Hg at 250c. The permeability limits indicated that papaya cheese could be safelypacked

    in awide range of packaging materials like low-density polyethylene, high-density polyethylene,

    polyproPylene etc.

    CONCLUSION

    The present study predicted that papaya cheese shows best stability at a relative humidity

    of 6g.3 per cent, as storage at higher relative humidity condition would result in deteriorationof the product. Moreover the cheese can be safely packed in a wide range of packaging

    materials like low-density polyethylene, high-density polyethylene, polypropylene etc'

  • 8/12/2019 ERH STUDIES of Papaya Cheese-libre

    3/4

    J. Adv. Sci. and Tech., 7 (l and ll), June, Dec., 2OO4

    REFERENCES

    Ahmed, J. and Choudhary, D.R. (1995). Osmotic dehydration of papaya. Ind. Fd. packer.49:5-9-

    Frazier, W.C. and Westhoff, D.C. (1995). Food Microbiology. Edn.4ih. Tata McGraw Hill publishingCompany Limited, New Delhi.

    Jain, N. L; Das, D. P. and Lal, G. (1954). Preparation of guava cheese. Chem. Age of lndia Series9:88.

    Landrock, A.R. and Proctar; B. E. (1951). A new graphical interpolation method for obtainnghumidity equilibrium data with special reference to its role in food packging studies. FoodIech.5:332-335

    Ranganna, S. (1997). Handbook of Analysis of Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable products.

    Edn. 2d. Tata McGraw Hiil Pubtishing Company Limited, New Dethi.Sagar, V. R. and Maini S.B. (1992). Economic utilization of rainy season Guava:drying aspects. lncl

    Fd. Packer.6:19-22.

    Wink, W. A. (1946). Determinig the moisture equilibrium curves of hygroscopic materials. tnd. Eng.Chem. Anal.18:251.

    11.1 32.4 43.7 52 68.3 71.4 79.61Equilibrium relative humidity(%)

    14

    s8,20o'coo915sr,'6EroE3L

    .ct=3CTIIJ

    Figure 1 : Humidity moisture equilibrium curve for papaya cheede.

    MG: MOULDGROWTH

    CP: CRITICAL POINT

    DP: D.TNGER POINT

  • 8/12/2019 ERH STUDIES of Papaya Cheese-libre

    4/4

    riiry

    15

    {i

    1,.

    th,nnh;

    h

    P

    I

    r

    I

    i

    J. Adv. Sci. and Tech., 7 (l and ll), June, Dec.' 2004

    Table 1 : Relationship between the equilibrium moisture content and time for equilibration atditferent relative humidities for papaya cheese at embient temperature (11.5 to 12.50c)

    (lnitial moisture cpmtemt 19.36%)

    Equilibruimrelative

    humidity(%)

    Equilibriummoisturecontent

    (%)

    Number ofdays required

    to reachequilibrium

    Remarks

    11.1

    32.4

    38.0

    43.7

    52.0

    68.3

    71.4

    79.61

    100

    3.82

    5-30

    6.30

    7.82

    12.1

    18.2

    19.3

    21.4

    52

    47

    42

    38

    31

    26

    18

    13

    Product very hard, brittle, cracks allaround, colour became lighter.

    Product very hard, brittle, cracks all around,very light colour

    Product very hard, brittle, cracks all around,very light colour

    Product very hard, brittle, cracks all around,very light colour

    Product had good texture and very lightcolour.

    Product had good texture.

    Product had good texture but there wasdarkening of product.

    Product hecame very soft and mould growthoccurred after 7 days.

    Product became semisolid after 2 days and

    mould growth occurred after 7 daYs