geophysical survey assessment report - ontario
TRANSCRIPT
Matrix GeoTechndogies Ltd. 172 Grand Lake Drive Wellington(Halifax)N.S. Phone (902)860-2726 Fax (902)484-7982
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd.
Geophysical Survey Assessment Report
GRADIENT and DIPOLE-DIPOLE ArrayTDIP\RESISTIVITY SURVEYSat the Hess Property, Ontario, onbehalf ofCHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD.Calgary,Alberta
M -220 4 8
MSTM6TMGTG Kallfa L Kapllani M Parent February 2001
S-160
^OSCIENCMSSESSMEM
41I12NE2017 2.22048 HESS 0 10
1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................^
2. General Survey Details................................................................................................................................ 4
2.1. LOCATION...............................................................................................................................^2.2. ACCESS.................................................................................................................................^2.3. SURVEY GRID.......................................................................................................................... 4
3. Survey Work Undertaken............................................................................................................................ 5
3.1. GENERALITIES.........................................................................................................................^3.2. PERSONNEL............................................................................................................................. 53.3. SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS.......................................................................................................... 53.4. SURVEY COVERAGE.................................................................................................................. 73.5. INSTRUMENTATION...................................................................................................................?3.6. PARAMETERS........................................................................................................................... 73.7. MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY.......................................................................... 83.8. DATA PRESENTATION ...............................................................................................................8
4. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION..........................................................................................................^
4.1. OVERVIEW............................................................................................................................. 10HESS GRID....................................................................................................................................... 114.7. GRADIENT TDIP SURVEY RESULTS.......................................................................................... 114.8. POLE-DIPOLE IP/RESISTIVITY AND QUANTITATIVE SECTION RESULTS ..............................................
5. Contusion and Recommendations..............................................................................................................
LI
Figures 1: General Location..............................................................................................................4
Figure 2: Gradient Array Layout.......................................................................................................6Figure 3: Pole Dipole 0=6 Array ........................................................................................................6
Table l: Reconnaissance Gradient TDIP Survey Coverage ............................................................... 7Table III: Pole Dipole TDIP Survey Coverage ................................................................................... 7Table IV: Decay Curve Sampling Iris IP10 (Cole-Cole windows)....................................................... 8Table VIM : Recommended IP Targets for Follow up at Hess Grid................................................... 12
QS160-February, 2001
41I12NE2017 2.22048 HESS 0 10C
1.
* MGT Project No:
* Project Name:
* Survey Period:
* Survey Type:
. Client:
* Client Address
QS-160
Hess Property
Feb 6 to Feb 9 , 2001; Feb 16 to Feb 23, 2001.
1) Gradient Time Domain Induced Polarization2) Pole Dipole Time Domain Induced Polarization
Champion Bear Resources Ltd.
200-9 Street S.W.
Calgary,Alberta,T2T 3C4
Client Representative: Mr. Seymour SearsSears, Barry and Associates Ltd.
Objectives:
1. Using IP\Resistivity, to map bulk conductivity and chargeabilitydistributions in order to locate potential base-metal sulphide concentrations associated with diabase dykes for the purposes of drill targeting, and to assist in general geologic mapping of lithology, structure and alteration.
2. The n^-6 Dipole-dipole array was chosen based on its simplicity, cross- sectional imaging capabilities and shallow to moderate depth penetration characteristics. The gradient profiling technique was later chosen due to better signal-to-noise, improved survey economics, and superior lateral resolution and depth penetration.
* Report Type: Summary interpretation, suitable for assessment
QS160-Febmary, 2001
2. GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS
2.1. LOCATION
* Township or District:
* Province or State:
* Country:
* Nearest Settlement:
2.2. ACCESS
* Base of Operations:
* Mode of Access:
2.3. SURVEY GRID
* Coordinate Reference System:
* Line Separation:
* Station Interval:
* Method of Chaining:
Hess Property
Ontario
Canada
Sudbury, ON
Sudbury.On
Road and Ski-doo trail
Local exploration grid
100 meters
25 meters
Metric, slope-chained
g J1Q11 BtTi Champion Bear Property
Figure 1: Champion Bear Properties General Location
QS160-February, 2001
, }.'3\-M-l f"-'
; ')lXk -n..
ro- \\\
Mud Lake
^^l ^
r
* j /' M 1/)
\ ~ u i '-Ai yHess TownshipJ
otftzp-i* j *j
n\^.-? \ !^.
\ V-1 ,^-O l/n)\ Cvh,O/ \ f i \ 6
O
(^
•'j s
i *--s
39c?'
r vi\o.i/^ M
s'-.
J/"-
^, 02,
Ys Green J
Lad
^ "^
i \
\Z.Scale 1:20,000
X ~
Figure IB: Location Map - Hess Grid, Champion Bear Resources Ltd.
s*PViS^^^-vb.."1***j,i*#., wao, J... 1.^w,,, !,,.j(f?vSrt:^. 1 ,r^
\\
3.
3.1. GENERALITIES
* Survey Dates:2001
* Survey Period:
* IP Survey Days (read time):
* Total km Surveyed:
. Standby/BW Days
Feb 6' H to Feb 9 m , 2001; Feb 16" to Feb 23,
12 days
12 days
Gradient Pole Dipole
15.8km 2.7km
0.5 day
3.2. PERSONNEL
* Project Supervisor:
* Project Manager:
* Field Technician:
* Field Assistants:
3.3. SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS
* Array:
* AB (Tx dipole spacing)
* MN (Rx dipole spacing):
* Sampling Interval:
Jack MacNeil, Halifax,N.S.
Maurice Parent.Edmunston.N.B.
Frederick (Brent) Thomas,NFLD
Arthur Andrews,NFLD Tyson Andrews,NFLD
Gradient (see Figure 2 ) Dipole Dipole (see Figure 3)
1.6km Gradient
50 meters Gradient 50 meters Dipole Dipole
50 meters TDIP
Profile Spacing: 50-100m
Total Gradient Blocks: 4 Blocks
Number of Dipole Dipole Lines: 6
QS160-Februay, 2001
GRADIENT AB s length c
MN = length P ,-P2 (6 x P,-P2 Spread)
GRADIENT ARRAY COVERAGE AREA
Picture 2: Gradient Arrav Lavout
Tx Pole
Infinite Wire
Rx Array (6 d ipoles 0=1 to 6)
l
X-Section Consisting of 6 Readings
Figure 3: Pole-Dipole Roll-Along (11=6) Array Lavout
QS160-February, 2001
Matrix GeoTechnotogies Ltd. TDIP/Resistivity Survey
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES, Ltd.
SURVEY COVERAGE
1. Reconnaissance Gradient IP: 1 5.81cm
2. Pole Dipole IP Detail follow up: 2.7 km
3 Total Field Magnetic:
LINEHess
BLOCK MIN. EXTENT MAX. EXTENT
Total
TOTAL (m)15,800
15,800
Table l: Reconnaissance Gradient TDIP Survey Coveraae
LINEHess
BLOCK MIN EXTENT MAX EXTENT
Total
TOTAL (m)2700
2700
Table H: Dipole Dipole TDIP Survey Coveraae
INSTRUMENTATION
3.1.1. TDIP Survey
* Receiver:
* Receiver Settings:
Transmitter:
Transmitter Settings:
Iris ELREC IP6 (time domain f G channels)
Delay time = 1 60 msec.
M1 = 1 40 msec. M2 = 160 msec.M3 = 160 msec. M4 = 160 msec.M 5 = 1 60 msec. M6 = 160 msec.M7 = 160 msec. M8 = 160 msec.M9 = 160 msec. M^ 160 msec.
Power Supply:
Phoenix IPT1
2 sec. On/Off Time .
8 sec. Total duty cycle
Phoenix IP Honda Generator (400 Hz 12.5Kw output)
QS160-February, 2001
Matrix GeoTechnotogies Ltd. TDIP/Resistivily Survey
PARAMETERS
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES, Ltd.
3.1.2. TDIP Survey
* Input Waveform: 0 .125 Hz square wave at 5007o duty cycle (2 seconds On/Off)
* Receiver Sampling Parameters: IRIS Cole-Cole windows
* Measured Parameters:
1) Chargeability in millivolts/Volt. 20 time slices are used for the calculation of decay curve parameters1 . Total Chargeability is calculated over an integration period of 20 to 1850ms (Cole - Cole windows).
2) Primary Voltage in millivolts and Input Current in amperes for Resis tivity calculation according to the gradient array geometry factor (Ap pendix C).
Table III: Decay Curve Sampling Iris IP6 (Cole-Cole windows)
MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY
* Chargeability:
Resistivity:
general^ 0.5 mV/V but acceptable to 1.0 mV/V.
less than 50Xo cumulative error from Primary vo- lage input current measurements.
DATA PRESENTATION
3.1.3. Gradient Survey
* Maps:
Plan Maps:
Interpretation Plan Maps:
Posted/contoured plan maps of Total Chargeability and Apparent Resistivity, compiled for all Gradient Blocks, at 1:2500 scale.
Interpreted Gradient chargeability axes, according to strength and resistivity association, geoelectric contacts and areas of priority follow-up, compiled with dipole-dipole, at 1:2500 scale.
C!S160-Febaiary, 2001
Vatrix GeoTechnotagies Ltd rniP/ResistMty Survey
Digital: Raw data:
Processed data:
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES, Lid.
Iris IP-6 digital dump file (See also Appendix D).
Geosoft .XYZ format.
using the following format:
Column 1 = Station/Line position, in meters Column 2 = Station/Line position, in meters Column 3 z Total Chargeability, in mV/V Column 4 z Vp in millivolts Column 5 = Mcc in mV/V Column 6 = Tau in seconds
3.1.4. Dide Dipole Survey
Maps:
Pseudosections:
Digital:
Raw data:
Processed data:
Posted/contoured pseudo depth section maps of combined Apparent Resistivity (interpreted) and Total Chargeability (M), for n^-6, at 1: 2500 scale.
IRIS IP6 digital dump file
Geosoft .XYZ format.
3S160-Febfuary, 2001 10
Matrix GeoTechnotogies Ltd. CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES, Ltd. TDIP/Resistivity Survey
4.1. OVERVIEW
The following discussion summarizes the results of the Gradient/ Dipole-Dipole TDIP/Resistivity surveys over the Hess Grid, undertaken by Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd. The exploration target consists of offset dyke deposit, with the mineralization occurring as disseminated to massive sulphides.
The present geophysical interpretation makes use of both the Resistivity and Time Domain Induced Polarization surveyed parameters, but puts particular emphasis on the chargeability parameter, due to its ability to detect and discern sulphide mineralization ranging from disseminate to massive concentrations. Furthermore, given its property wide coverage, the gradient array survey results are relied upon as a bulk conductivity/chargeability mapping tool - with the more limited dipole-dipole coverage used to better define and detail the cross-sectional nature of the TDIP responses at depth. Of note, regarding the differences in information provided by the dipole-dipole and gradient arrays, in contrast to the dipole-dipole array data, which are more localized in their application, the nature of the information obtained, and the depth control, the present gradient surveys map are more regional in character - owing to the broader and stationary Tx array used and the resulting single stationary field distribution for the entire survey. The large transmit dipole employed provides significant depth of investigation in the central region of the grid and the narrow receiver dipoles also offer significant lateral resolution, but are none the less subject to significant volume averaging.
Based on the array geometry chosen, gradient investigation depths approaching 250 meters were obtained - with the deepest penetration in the middle third of the array and shallower depths of investigation progressively closer to the transmit electrodes. The gradient apparent resistivity and chargeability data therefore represent a bulk average, from surface to depth, when observed in plan view- this also contrast the dipole-dipole results, which are best considered in cross-sectional representation format. Furthermore, the gradient array anomaly patterns are essentially subvertical (i.e. without complex, asymmetric pant-leg shapes, as in dpdp), and can be visualized in plan in the same manner as magnetic data. However, in the presence of moderate to shallow dips, the gradient array anomalies tend to be shifted down-dip relative to shallower arrays, such as dipole-dipole - greater discrepancies can also occur with dipole-dipole, owing to the asymmetric array geometry, which tends to bias anomalies towards the infinity pole.
The geophysical interpretation plan presents the interpreted anomaly axes, highlighting the strength and resistivity association of the IP axes to their source/alteration type:
a) High resistivity IP axes, related to either disseminated sulphides or magnetite possibly associated with quartz-carbonate alteration or, alternatively, more felsic/less porous geology and/or bedrock/overburden topographic effects;
b) Nil (flat) resistivity and contact-type IP axes likely correspond to possibly more weakly- altered and/or thin/buried sulphide zones and/or mineralization along geologic contacts, or magnetite/hematite; and
c) Low (conductive) resistivity IP axes representing the key target signature relating to possible massive to stringer sulphides or, alternatively, faulted or clay-altered disseminated sulphides magnetite/hematite.
Clearly, while all anomaly types (high p / low p / nil p), could potentially represent equally valid exploration targets, the high resistivity/high chargeability association best represents the key geophysical target signature, based on the geologic model.
QS160-Februafy, 2001 11
The chargeability axes identified on the anomaly axis map have been: a) categorized according to their strength (weak, moderate, strong, very strong) using symbols, and b) classified according to their resistivity association (high p, nil p/contact-type, low p) using colored axes. The line-to-line correlation of anomalies into axes is based primarily on the resistivity association (i.e. resistive and conductive anomalies never aligned along the same axis due to likely dissimilar mineralogy l a lteration l origin) - thereby providing some measure of geologic/geophysical control to the interpretation. Note that, due to the relative insensitivity of Gradient to depth of burial, target depths have not been determined for the anomalies of interest.
In order to better highlight the close relationship between the IP (sulphide magnetite) and Resistivity (lithology, structure, alteration), the areas of geophysical interest have been identified on the interpretation plan, using variable cross-hatching styles: a) contrasting zones of resistivity, highlighting potential geological contacts, alteration zones and fault-fracture structure, b) zones of high chargeability, outlining potential regions of increased sulphide mineralization. In addition, fault structures have also been interpreted based on evidence from the TDIP results, generally represented by lower resistivity and lower chargeability.
HESS GRID
GRADIENT TDIP SURVEY RESULTS
The following represent the geophysical interpretation of the gradient survey over the Hess Grid, making use of Resistivity and TDIP surveyed parameters, particularly emphasis on the chargeability parameter, due to its ability to detect and discern sulphide mineralization ranging from disseminate to massive concentrations. Furthermore, given its property wide coverage, the gradient array survey results are relied upon as a bulk conductivity/chargeability mapping tool.
The total chargeability and apparent resistivity show that the Hess Grid is characterized by moderate to strong IP responses, ranging from 10 mV/V to 14 mV/V. This is associated with high/nil resistivity, which form NE-SW bands following - suggesting possible disseminated to semi-massive sulphides. Hence, in addition to more favorable, in terms of strength of chargeability the nil/high resistivity association of the highest priority targets also best fit the geologic target model, likely representing the mineralization along an offset dyke and/or contact deposit type. On the other hand, low resistivity/strong to moderate IP responses are observed, suggesting possible presence of massive mineralization in the property, implying the property is characterized by two type of geophysical targets.
More moderate chargeabilities associated with similar resistivity either indicate more deeply buried mineralization or weaker sulphide/magnetite content.
The gradient chargeability responses at Hess Grid a re characterized by the broad range in strength, varying between weak to very strong (1.0 to 19.4 mV/V) but generally falling in the weak category (avg. 6.0 mV/V) - consistent with non-polarizable geological units and/or moderate overburden cover. The total chargeability shows a well-defined chargeability contact in the north, associated with resistivity contact, likely defining the geological contact between more polarizable units to the north, consistent to intrusives and less polarizable metasediments. The strong measured chargeabilities observed in the central part of the grid are consistent to massive sulphides, when conductive, otherwise important concentration of disseminated sulphides and/or magnetite (when magnetic), particularly when high resistivity. The most important IP axes are generally strike extensive ^200 m), displaying generally strong responses, either reflecting high in concentration or shallow depth of burial along the strike. In addition to, the high IP features display wide, oval shape, occurring along high/low resistivity contacts, suggesting contact deposit types, likely with semi-massive to massive mineralization in the center rimmed by disseminated sulphides.
QS160-February, 2001 11
The apparent resistivities display a wide range, varying between 195 ohm-m to 77.5 k ohm-m (avg. 19.6k Q-m), indicative of a mixed low porosity bedrock at depth - with the average consistent with outcropped or shallow buried volcanics. Generally, the apparent resistivity plan map shows a more complicated distribution of the geological units, with higher resistivity units in the north and grid center, likely representing intrusives or metavolcanics. The very high resistivity values possi bly reflect the outcropping and/or shallow occurrence. The conductive units likely represent me- '^sediments and/or deep overburden, following the same trends as weak chargeability geology. As n roviously mentioned, the high/low resistivity contact observed in the north, approximately follow-
i q the TL2+OOS, likely represents the geological contact between volcanics and the more porousnetasedimentary units.
Nearly all the strong anomalies present good geophysical targets, especially those exhibiting conductive and nil/contact type resistivity association represent the primary geophysical target - ins list presented in Table VII is designed to help direct follow-up and possibly also DDH-testing into the best portion of the major axes.
LINE
L700E
L600E
L300E
L200E
STATION
4+75S
5+75S
6+25S
3+75S
6+25S
STRENGTH
Strong
Strong
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
RES. ASSOC.
Low
High
Nil/Contact
High
Nil
PRIORITY
1.5
1.5
1.5
2
2
DEPTH COMMENTS
Prominent low resistivity signature associ ated with strong IP. Not strike extensive axis. Likely dipping to south. Geophysical follow-up recommended.Strong IP response centered on high resis tivity axis. Strike extensive; axis (more than 400m). Likely representing mineralization along offset dyke. Geophysical follow-up recommended.Prominent strong IP response centered on high resistivity axis. Located in the same IP axis with the target at L600E, st.5+755. Likely representing contact type of minerali zation. Geophysical follow-up recom mended.Moderate IP signature associated with high/contact resistivity. Wide, oval shape anomaly, likely still open to west, and inter preted as contact type of mineralization. Geophysical follow-up recommended.Moderate IP signature associated with high/contact resistivity. Likely still open to west, and interpreted as contact type of mineralization. Geophysical follow-up rec ommended.
Table VII: Recommended IP Targets for Follow up at Hess Grid
QS160-February, 2001 19
CHAMPION BEAR "SOURCES. Ud
Hess Grid
The Hess Grid exhibits moderate to strong IP anomalies in plan, dominant high/nil/contact re sistivity association, suggest the possibility of disseminated mineralization. In addition to, low re sistivity/strong chargeability present in the grid likely are related with heavily disseminated to mas sive. The geophysical axes of significance predominate the central part of the survey area. The gradient data shows a NE-SE band of high resistivity/weak to moderate chargeability likely repre senting disseminated volcanics or deeper zones of interest.
In response to the survey objectives, three (3) high priority targets have been identified in the central part of the grid area, which are of significant strength to warrant geophysical follow-up prior DDH-drilling program. For the most part, these also feature high bulk resistivities, consistent with disseminated sulphide mineralization. As many as two (2) lower priority targets are also defined, which either feature weaker chargeability - ground geophysical follow-up is strongly recommended prior DDH-drilling program.
We recommend the interpreted anomalous chargeability zones delineated by the combination of gradient and dipole-dipole surveys, represented as. Quantitative Sections, to be examined by drill-testing. Also, ground magnetic survey can provide useful information regarding the geological structures and the delineation of offset dyke in the property.
Further evaluation of the geophysical results in combination .with existing geoscientific data is also recommended. Drill testing the interpreted geophysical targets described above has been recommended according to target specifications defined based primarily on the combined inter pretation of gradient and dipole-dipole cross-sectional coverage, finalized in Quantitative Sec tions.
The chargeability axes display a variety of strengths and resistivity associations, such that, based on the gradient survey alone, all the most significant anomalies represent equally good tar gets, particularly the conductors - possibly differing only in their type-alteration. Particular atten tion should be given to the probable type of mineralization and alteration indicated by the resistivity association (i.e. high p s silicic, nil p = weak silicic/argillic, low p = argillic or stringer-to-massive). Additional comparisons against recommended ground magnetics could provide insight on the source mineralogy of many IP targets, i.e. magnetic = probable pyrrhotite or magnetite iron forma tion. The continued use of combined geophysical techniques, such as magnetics and TDIP, should prove useful in fully determining physical property distributions and mineral composition throughout the property.
Clearly, we recommend that the ground surveys be extended, as the strongest IP anomalies remain open, and additional geophysical follow-up are strongly recommended in the grids with gra dient survey coverage only, in order to obtain information regarding the depth extension of the geological structures and/or mineralization. Also, as previously mentioned additional ground mag netics survey is recommended helping to define the non-magnetic targets and/or structural geol ogy.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTEDf
'5encKallfa L/ / Ludvig Kapllani, Ph.D. Senior Geophysicist Senior Geophysicist
20
Witrix GeoTechnologies Ltd. ' ' P/Pesistivity Survsy
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES, Ltd.
'EORFTICAL BASIS AND SURVEY PROCEDURES
GRADIENT INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
The Gradient Array measurements are unique in that fiey best represent a bulk average of the sur- unding physical properties within a relatively focused sphere of influence, roughly equal to the width of the neiver dipole, penetrating vertically downward from surface t j great depths. These depth of penetration*d lateral resolution characteristics are typically presented in plan.
The resistivity is among the most variable of all geophysical parameters, with a range exceeding f. Because most minerals are fundamentally insulators, with the exception of massive accumulations of etallic and submetallic ores (electronic conductors) which are rare occurrences, the resistivity of rocks de- irids primarily on their porosity , permeability and particularly the salinity of fluids contained (ionic conduc- n), according to Archie's Law. In contrast, the chargeability responds to the presence of polarizeable min- iis (metals, submetallic sulphides and oxides, and graphite), in amounts as minute as parts per hundred. 1 1 the quantity of individual chargeable grains present, and their distribution with in subsurface current•" paths are significant in controlling the level of response. The relationship of chargeability to metallic itent is straightforward, and the influence of mineral distribution can be understood in geologic terms by nsidering two similar, hypothetical volumes of rock in which fractures constitute the primary current flow iths In one, sulphides occur predominantly along fracture surfaces. In t!ie second , the same volume per- rit of sulphides are disseminated throughout the rock. The second example will, in general, have signifi- r tly lowor intrinsic chargeability.
y-ax/s
.LJM N
Bx-axis
Figure B1: Gradient array configuration
3Si60-Febmsy,2001 23
Matrix GeoTechnotogies Ltd. TDIP/Resistivily Survey
CHAMPION BEEAR RESOURCES, Ltd
Using the diagram in Figure B1 for the gradient array electrode configuration and nomenclature: , the gradient array apparent resistivity is calculated:
where: the origin O is selected at the center of ABthe geometric parameters are in addition to a = AB/2 and b = MN/2 X is the abscissa of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative) Y is the ordinate of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative)
Gradient Array Apparent Resistivity:
pa = K —— ohm - metres
where: K =2n
(AM~* -AN' 1 -BM'1
+y
AN =
-b-a) + y
BN =
Using the diagram in Figure 82 for the Total Chargeability:
Measured Voltage Line
positive
negative
One half of Transmit Cycle
"Off Time"
Time Line
Figure B2: The measurement of the time-domain IP effect
From Terraplus\BRGM, IP-6 Operating Manual. Toronto, 1987.
QS160-February, 2001 24
Matrix Gee-Technologies Ltd. TDIP/Resistivity Survey
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES, Ltd.
the total apparent chargeability is given by:
Total Apparent Chargeability:3
Mr = (t)dt millivolts per volt
where t -f fy+i are the beginning and ending times for each of the chargeability slices,
More detailed descriptions on the theory and application of the IP/Resistivity method can be found in the following reference papers:
Cogan, H., 1973, Comparison of IP electrode array; , Geophysics, 38, p 737 - 761.
Langore, L., Alikaj, P., Gjovreku, D., 1989, Achievements in copper sulphide exploration in Albania with IP and EM methods, Geophysical Prospecting, 37, p 925 - 941.
DIPOLE DIPOLE
The collected data sets are reduced, using IP10 receiver, to apparent resistivity and total chargeability as explained in the following figures and equations:
Using the following diagram (Fig. B3) for the electrode configuration and nomenclature:4
POLE-DIPOLE ARRAY
P2 P,na
i i i
Figure B3: Po/e-D/'po/e Electrode Array
3 From Telford, ei al, Applied Geophysics. Cambridge U Press, New York, 1983..4 From Telford, et al., Applied Geophysics. Cambridge U Press, New York, 1983..
QS160-February, 2001 25
Matrix GeoTechnotogies LW. TDIP/ResistMty Survey
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES, Ltd.
the apparent resistivity is given by:
VPM v r r n -f 1) a x — 0/im - metres
where:"a" is the MN dipole spacing (metres) "n" is the separation parameter between Ci and PiP2 "Vp" is the primary voltage measured between PiP2 (volts) "l" is the output current between CiC2 (amperes)
' sing the following diagram (Figure B4) for the Total Chargeability:5
Measured Voltage Line One half of Transmit Cycle
"Off Time"positive j
Time Line
negative"On Time" t (0) td
Figure B4: Measurement of the IP Effect in the Time-Domain
the total chargeability.-6 is given by:
T7~ S*IJ i-ltolO
TOW Jt' millivolt - seconds per volt
where f/, tj+i are the beginning and ending times for each of the chargeability slices.
The sets are then ready for plotting, profiling using the Geosoft Sushi program. The Apparent Resistivity and total Chargeability results of the Dipole-Dipole surveys are presented in pseudo section format. All resistivities are in Q-metres and chargeabilities in mV/V.
5 From Terraplus\BRGM, IP-6 Operating Manual. Toronto, 19879 From Tetford, et al., Applied Geophysics. Cambridge U Press, New York, 1983..
QS160-Februay, 2001 26
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd. TDIP/Resistivity Survey
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES, Ltd.
APPENDIX A. . . . . . ,. .-
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Ludvig Kapllani, declare that
1 l am a consulting geophysicist with residence in Toronto, Ontario and am presently work ing in this capacity with Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd. of Toronto, Ontario.
2. l obtained a Bachelor's of Science Degree, (B.Sc.), Geophysics, in spring 1976, a Masters of Science Degree, (M.Se.), Geophysics, in June 1986, and a Ph.D in January 1995, Geo physics, from Polytechnic University of Tirana, Albania.
3. l have practiced my profession continuously since May 1976, in North America and Europe.
4. l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive anv interest in the properties or securities of Champion Bear Resources Ltd.
5. l am the author of this report and the staterm nts contained represent my professional opinion based on my consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.
Toronto, Ontario March, 2001
1
udvig Kapllani, Ph.D.
Senior Geophysicist Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd.
QS160-Febnjary, 2001 27
M 'ri, GeoTechnologies Ltd. CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES, Ltd. : tp Resistivity Survey
APPENCMXA
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:
l, Gene Kallfa, declare that:
1. l am a consulting geophysicist with residence in Toronto, Ontario and am presently working in this capacity with Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd. of Toronto, Ontario.
2.l obtained a Bachelor's of Science Degree, (B.Se.), Geophysics, from the Polytechnic Univer sity, in Tirana, Albania, in spring 1987.
3. l have practiced my profession continuous y since May 1987, in North America and Europe.
4. l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Champion Bear Resources Ltd..
5. l am the author of this report and the statements contained represent my professional opinion based on my consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this re port.
Toronto, Ontario March, 2001
Gene1 KaHfa, B.Sc.
Senior Geophysicist Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd.
8160-February, 2001 28
Matrix GeoTechnokxjies LW. TDIP/Resistivity Survey
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES, Ltd.
APPENDIX B
INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS
IRIS ELREC 6 Receiver(from IRIS Instruments IP 6 Operating Manual)
Weather proof case
Dimensions: Weight:
Operating temperature:
Storage: Power supply:
V externalInput channels:Input impedance:Input overvoltage protection:Input voltage range:
'' ^ compensation:
f oise rejection:
Primary voltage resolution: accuracy:
Secondary voltage windows:
1 .1 npling rate: Synchronization accuracy: Chargeability resolution:
accuracy:
Battery test: Grounding resistance: Memory capacity:
31 cm x 21 cm x 21 cm6 kg with dry cells7.8 kg with rechargeable bat.-200C to 70"C(-40DC to 70"C wLh optional screen heater)(-400C to 700C)6 x 1.5 V dry cell 5 (100 hr. @ 200C) or2 x 6 V NiCad rechargeable (in series) (SOhrs @ 20"C) or 1 x12
610 Mohmup to 1000 volts10V maximum on each dipole15V maximum sum over eh 2 lo 6automatic 10 V with linear drift correctionup to 1 mV/s50 to 60 Hz powerline rejectiori100 dB common mode rejection (for Rs^)automatic stacking1 nV after stackingQ.3% typically; maximum 1 over wholetemperature rangeup to 10 windows; 3 preset window specs.plus fully programmable sampling.10 ms10 ms, minimum 40 (.iV0.1 mV/Vtypically D.6%. maximum 2% of reading 1 mV/V forVp > 10 mVmanual and automatic before each measurement0.1 to467kohm2505 records, 1 dipole/record
QS160-Febfuary, 2001 29
Saturday, February 3, 2001.Day-21: Operating: Bear Tag Property Gradient Array
Read 2500 meters. Read L-600W from BL-0+00 to lOOOS; L-700W from 25 N to 975S; L-800W from fiL-C^W to 500S.
Sunday, February 4, 200 1Day-22: Operating; Bear Tag Property Gradient Array
Read 2050 meters. Read L-800W from 500S to 1000S; L-900W from BL-OHX) to 1000S; L-1000W from BL-0+00 to 550S.
Monday, February 5,Day-23: Operating: Bear Tag Property Gradient Array
We went to pick up the equipment and the infinite wires and rods. We went to the Hess property to try and get to L-500E on the lake but there is too much slush on the lake. It took 2 1/2 hours to get the snowmobiles back to the truck. We put a hole in the ice to check how thick h was and there seemed to be only 5 inches. We returned to the motel and called Seymore.
Tuesday, February 6, 2001.Dav-24: Onemtiiw Hess Property Gradient Array
Gradient. Read 2000 meters. Read L-400E from BL-0 to 1000S; L-500E from BL-0 to 1000S. We were lucky to find a trail that brought us to 1 175S on L-500E. After setting up the infinite (500n to 11 75s) on L-SOOE we started reading.
Wednesday, February 7, 2001.Day-25: Operating; Hess Property Gradient Array
Gradient. Read 3400 meters. Read L-300E from BL-0 to 1000S; L-600E from BL-0 to 1000S; L-700E from BL-0 to 700S; L-800E from BL-0 to 700S.
Thursday, February 8, 2001.Day-26: 0.5 Operating: Hess Property Gradient Array
GradientRead 1000 meters. Read L-200E from BL-0 to 1000S. The line cuttershad to finish cutting L-200E. we read the line then picked up the infinite wire androds. We started the dipole-dipole on L-500E.End of Hess Block # A
Logistics Report
Thursday, February 8,2001.Day-lfo 0.5 Operating; Hess Property Dipole-Dipolg
Read 600 meters. Read L-500E, from 1100S to 500S. We had done gradient also.
Friday, February 9,2001.Way-27: O.S Operating; Hess Property Dipolc-Dipole
Read 500 meters. Read L-500E from 500S to BL-0.0.5 Bad Weather We finished the dipole-dipole survey on block # A and thenpacked the equipment and drove back to Windy Lake Motel. We had freezingrain and it rained hard starting at 11:00 am.
Logistics Report
Operator Journal:
Project # 0049-3 - February 16 to 23, 2001
Friday, February 16, 2001Day-1: 0.5 Operating: Hess property Gradient array
(Finished the project with the other client this morning.) Then we returned to the Hess property to lay the infinite wire on L-1000E from SOON to 1200S. Block-B.
" ? 3turday, February 17, 2001.; ny-2: Operating: Hess property Gradient array
Read 2800 meters. Read L-800E from BL-0 to 700S, L-900E from BL-0 to 700S, L-1000E from BL-0 to 700S, L-11 GOE from BL-0 to 700S. We were delayed a bit because we had to repair a broken wire on the power board of the generator. Everything is working fine now.
Sunday, February 18, 2001. X-iy-3: Operating: Hess property Gradient array
Read 3100 meters. Read L-1200E from BL-0 to 700S, L-1300E from BL-0 to 700S. End of Block-B. We laid the infinite on L-1500E from 450N to 1200S for Block-C and read L-1300E from BL-0 to 700S, L-1400E from BL-0 to 500S, and L-1500E from BL-0 to 500S.
Monday, February 1 9, 2001Day-4: Operating: Hess property Gradient array
Read 2550 meters. Read L-1600E from 25S to 525S, L-1700E from BL-0 to 500S, and L-1800E from BL-0 to 500S. We set the Block-D infinite on L-2000E from SOON to 11 SOS and read L-1800E from BL-0 to 500S, L-1900E from BL-0 to 550S.
Tuesday, February 20, 2001Day-5: Operating: Hess property dipole-DipOi'e
Read 1700 meters. Read L-300E from BL-0 tolOOOS, L-700E from BL-0 to 700S.
Wednesday, February 2 1, 2001Day-6: 0.5 Operating: Hess property Dipole-Dipole
Read 1000 meters. Read L-500E from BL-0 to 1000S.0.5 Operating: Hess property Gradient arrayRead 1300 meters. Read L-2000E from BL-0 to 600S and L-2100E from BL-0to 700S on Block-D.
Thursday, February 22, 2001Day-7: Operating: Hess property Gradient array
Read 3200 meters. Block-D. Read L-2200E from BL-0 to 750S, L-2300E from BL-0 to 800S. Block-E, read L-2300E from BL-0 to 800S; L-2400E from BL-0 to 850S. Infinite on L-2500E from SOON to 11508.
Friday, February 23, 2001Day-8: Operating: Hess property Gradient array
BlockE. Read 2850 meters. Read L-2500E from Bl-0 to 900S, L-2600E fromBL-0 to 950S; L-2700E from BL-0 to l GOGS'. We picked up the infinite andequipment and returned to the hotel.END OF HESS PROPERTY
isties Report.
Matrix Geo Technologies Ltd. Induced Polarization Survey - Sudbury Basin, Ontario
Page 1Property
HessHessHessHessHessHess
HessHessHessHessHessHess
HessHessHessHessHessHess
HessHessHessHessHess
Total:
HessHessHessTotal:
Line #800E900E1000E11 GOE1200E1300E
1300E1400E1500E1600E1700E1800E
1800E1900E2000E2100E2200E2300E
2300E2400E2500E2600E2700E
300E500E700E
FromBL-0BL-0BL-0BL-0BL-0BL-0
BL-0BL-0BL-0
025SBL-0BL-0
BL-0BL-0BL-0BL-0BL-0BL-0
BL-0BL-0BL-0BL-CBL-0
BL-0BL-0BL-0
To700S700S700S700S700S700S
700S500S500S525S500S500S
500S550S600S700S750S800S
800S850S900S950S1000S
1000S1000S700S
Distance (m)7007007007007007004200700500500500500500320050055060070075080039008008509009501000450015800
100010007002700
Survey TypeGradient - Block- BGradient - Block- BGradient - Block- BGradient - Block- BGradient - Block- BGradient - Block- B
Gradient - Block- CGradient - Block- CGradient - Block- CGradient - Block- CGradient - Block- CGradient - Block- C
,
Gradient - Block- DGradient - Block- DGradient - Block- DGradient - Block- DGradient - Block- DGradient - Block- D
Gradient - Block- EGradient - Block- EGradient - Block* EGradient - Block- EGradient - Block- E
Gradient
Dipole-DipoleDipole-DipoleDipole-DipoleDipole-Dipole
8
\ x \
\ /
8
PR
OF
ILE
S
o g
:OD
l .
"*
JK
i ~
oi ^
(B
t-*
Q.
DO
OD
Q)
. __
,
P-D J "T
8
PR
OFI
LES
~L2
5^
rn CO —i
rn 73 en
rn Q ~T3 ir
-c CO
l—l
o CO
t en
o 00
1
001
n
— i
r
^-
Q.O
D
01 O
gi II
*"
"l 2
en re
m
S3
1*i
s to
o 1C CO m XJ
X
I m CO
8-o
8
PR
OFI
LES
m
^
en -H m en
m
a
~u IE
-C
CO
l—l
o CO
r o
V
Oj"n
Ni.
Kn
-*o
o i
a o O
00
tn T
Ol QL
ii" 3 en c n 1C
5
ZC
D5
n i—
mm
0
~a
cnn
5C
ox-
i-.* i ~
oi ^ IB
•~
Q.O
J
g i 7
J-r
en
rer
owro
aa
m
ID* 73 73 rn
en
IT
CO
8 8
PR
OFI
LES
rn CO -H rn 73 z en
rn
a ir C
O i—i
o CO
l *—
^ '
, ..
n i
o
JLV*
J
.o
-. ~
M. o
"n
N
-.
f? o o 00
-i DI Q. i
J
SOD
l" "
5*
2.0
cnn
*c o
*-
roi
T! **
^c*
Q
. CO
m
Z-S
-wo
IB
*M8?
o
H ^-
aim
O
M
O a OD m ^ 73 m CO
K a
8P
RO
FILE
S
5~n
rn CO -H rn X) z CD rn
a
~o
n: -c CO l—l
o CO
a,..
12.5
-0^P
o
,— ~
~i vi
C7
in o
-.
—
nt-H
o
'n N
-i
ft,a
a <
2
Cd 1— 1
O
X*
01
N
-~ n o CD
- a,
IS" 5
1 D
™^
"
Q.C
D
W
ow
a CD m m CO
m
o CO it o f
m
8
PR
OFI
LES
m CO •H rn z CD m
o ~D n: -c CO l—l
n CO
z —l
—
3
TJ ;
0LO
--
e o
re
mo 0
in S
-O?
^3-H
3
f*t
Dj
^^ l
-- "
Q
. CD
: i
•—re
Jt
n N
--c
cnra
fe^
i "H
O CD rn CO
m CO —i
rn en
rn
Q
~D n -K CO l—
ln CO
8
J__
__
__
L.
8
\\ /
X
\
\
8P
RO
FILE
S
IS
en y
Tgffl
"l 2
9^
en
r r-
j1,t^
. . ^
|A
O
-.
——
—
o
-n N
r.
O*
01
<n
— -.
O tt o fs) o 00
s.
™
H l-
'
- - "
CLO
D
m
K ,
Sf
" •*
z en
mT
3
to
VI
O a CD m XI m CO
8
8
/
\ } \\
g
8
PRO
FILE
S
fi *co i^ ^
CO —H rn 73 CD rn Q
13 CO o CO
CO n o
'en
'i i
,
. .
o IsJ
oo
-,
D ^
T);
;*'
~*
mr-
2**
S-"
0.03
w
O IE ~D i—i
Q CO m 73
3O m CO
a -n y "i rv t-*i
o
l c?
m
^ CO —i
m 73 z CD IE -C
CO o
B
r e
n /
//
\
\
fi *COis B
PRO
FILE
S
z ,—
—i
. 3 ~
D 3D
^ J.
5. S.
8O
ti
t, -.
Ss ;
s-". T < K
1C
OJ
55 s*"
T)
OD
^ i?, s s
en re
o in -D
i—i
Q CD rn 73 m CO
rn
^ CO —i
rn 73 •z. CD rn
o ir CO l—t
o CO
J
8
CO
X f
x/f
^
8 S
PRO
FILE
S
o NJ
ZO
J
cnn
o CD m 3d m CO
1 o 3
8 CO y CO CO ^ LO CO LO I LO | LO
( ( ilgb b I
1 ) \ 1
i
8 S
31
i t
'
en
a -
Ii
t
8 S
[
^f
/
f 7 7 i**s~
- ,.
H 3 j
\ \ /
s/^
i ^-^
^
\ y \N
,
1 '
S8en
Q
! '
1
8 S
"-i c ^PR
OFI
LES
EASTERN
en rn
ea T) -c CO 1 — 1
o CO
en
n o- m ^~
*-
wLn
i:!i f
i S'CD 70 N
J
^o z"
i0
'K
)
CD
D 3
1 W
-. i
r1
V" ^
D en c :
^
ZC
Dm
" "
o'
2-Q
mn
?!FJ?
^
Q.O
3 W
" ?
- "
'"'C
D
^ a"
S ^
^ ^**
" T
o
Q-g
^ to
3 rn
*i
-i01
g
5"1
to
0
IE I* TJ
i — i
a z DO m "^ TO 73 m CO -
R a g —H
* O t Of -1 n o ? m a CO n jj U -H s o o Oi 8. Cf
8 S
3 i.i,,-'
*
•—
CO
t—O
LH
O
-I
i 1
i 1
^
g
. H 3 i
' P
i
en
8'
LO g LO CO CO CO LO hj
0*
LO | CO 0
,'
ys
i \\
~v. N
\ y7
x
;c
\ i
. v\ 1
s
Sg'
te is^
H
g
Xc/
1
EASTERN
en m Q ~D CO i — i
o CO
b
!n
' \S
-
8 S"
PRO
FILE
S
n ,
3
f ^
ZC
D
" S™
" cT
z ..
w
[Jxi
tn n
05 in
"2
-8
""
SK*"
3
l~~
?1 -:
.i ?
-5
^"a
'z—
D
-HN
-
j,
-0^
-0
ID
5 l:
i- i
I1-
2 s*
wo
o ic
(L*
^*
Q
. CD
"^~i
3
ID
u
^^
3
^
fTl
i.?
co ^ 2
s" s S
"N.
e
^ -l o
Q-
o *
S"™ a
3 m
3 "
5 W
"
**
S
—
cnra
i ^
ow
rn
' IS)
— * D ^ O 1C 3 i —
i Q
Z OD rn 3
^70 50 rn CO m
g Q g -n -H 3 S J- t; tt O*
-i A m w *, A W ™j
O O 0 b 1
- R
S
3:r
P i -
n
o
en
O ' —
'1
,1
,1
u
, i
i i
U)
8 CO CO CO CO CO CO M S1 CO i CO B
1 /' \ \ \ \ \
\ /'"l
l \\ \
i i
i i \\
^-^ y \ 1
s
S lg
SSm
3 O
5^
t/)
t/l
O
t/
8 S"
71
PRO
FILE
S
CO
rn
2 2
leo
o7^
^
Sf1"
" o*
5
CO
z
SJB
cnn
3*—
1 -"
77
ac -
o x;
~
z
e o"f
~g
' cO
jn
fio* ^
''3
l~™
"~
Tl
?o
-—
iw
C5
^3
^*
—.
| _ ,
z
"0 ?||
S. ?[z
*n S
i
en
S S
c i?
""Q
.CD
w
r*1
a. i^
P'-^cn
^Q
TO
S-iiS
o"1
m~
Ui*
f
Sa
Srn
*"^
11
- ?.
^ i"
^030
~^
* Q
-B d
i a
rn00
-1-
ic
o '
""
^i —
'z"i
*w
"^"
rn0
g
" cn
n CO
CO
n
o**
~
i 3
M
\ S \ 7MF IP RES X f \ 1 RES IP MF
10K.
100-
i
30.
15-
n
SDK.
5000-
wn
\ ^ / r50" r\ J \~/
•^-^ —
— 5000
____ ^*-•^— - —— —— — -^" ~~ —— ——— """^
. w
30 10K
CDLL!
15 .100 " LLOCtD-
D 17+00 S S+OQ S 5+00 S 4+00 S 3+00 S 2+00 S 1+00 S 0+00
CHAMPION BEAR RES.Hess Gr Id
Line 1300 EBlock C AB~ 1650 metres
MN:: 50m Read Interval 50mEquipnant: ELREC IP-6,
PHOENIX IPT-l and HONDA MG-2
IP Gradient Survey
Scale 1:5000 Date: 01/02/16NTS Ref: BL-Az: TN
EASTERN GEOPHYSICSGEOSOFT (tin) Software for the Earth Sciences, Toronto, Canada
MF IP ^ X ~^\ /' K6S ,P MF CHAMPION BEflR RES.10K-
t
100-
1
30-
-
15-
50K-
-
5000-
sno
s ^. ^ _
—
—
-- -- — — — -~-^ ^
50K
JOW
fm
30
.15
Jl
f1CK Hess GrJdLine 1400 E
Block C AB" 1650 netresft MN= 50m Read interval 50m-J Equipment: ELREC IP-6.
- 100 ^ P HOENIX IPT-l and HONDA MG-2
S IP Gradient Survey
-l5+00 S 4+00 S 3+00 S 2+00 S 1+00 S 0+00 Scale 1:5000 Date: 01/02/18
NTS Ref: BL-fl z : TN
EASTERN GEOPHYSICSGEOSOFT (tnl Software for the Earth Sciences. Toronto. Canada
\ ""^7MF IP RES V\ y \ / RES IP MF
10K
100-
-
'-
30
-
15-
-
0
SDK
-
5000-
-
500
~~~~ v.-"- x
—
—
^^ _ ^ — -^-5+00 S 4+00 S 3+00 S 2+00 S 1+00 S OH
^SOK
-5000
50000
-30
.15
-0
-IGK
10 UJ
-"^ODC Q-
J
CHAMPION BEAR RES.Hess Gr I d
Line 1500 EBlock C AB* 1650 metres
M^ 50m Read Interval 50mEquipnant: ELREC IP-6.
PHOENIX IPT-l and HONDA MG-2
IP Gradient Survey
Scale 1:5000 Date: 01/02/18NTS Ref: BL-flz: TN
EASTERN GEOPHYSICS
EASTERN
GEOPHYS
1 — 1
O CO
1 < 1
8 l/) en LO i LO LO to s CO i CO ^ LO o 0 rf z ^
-H ..
" OD ir -"2
Z ^
^ o NJ ro
8 S
3i
l j
1 '
*-*
m t —
ID en
o -.
-.,
l i
r ^
, i
, i
L
l (
\ X
\ \ \
; is
s{
\'
N
\\
\
1 1
1 /"
f*"
C ^^. >
U L?
9
f
|[
bl
' 1
H(—
* (li
—en
a
8
S"
PR
OFI
LES
3 io
,"m
"
ST
o QI
-'
.- "O
n
— "
l in
ff3
^ s
*-
* ^'
n —
- -
Q
. 7*
^ 2
-B
W
2. 5
P - -
^ o e
n
C ^n ^
gO
Q,
!* 1? J
L?
f"11
*"
T
s
aifo
m
ow
IO
i H ) j ^ \
y
"J ; x 2 n n 5 5 CHAMPIO
z OD m DO
3D m CO
S o CO o
-n 3 ~ a \ n o* r rn Q) CO n 7? W -. o o o
b S.
Qt
1 l l
en CO ^ s CO CO cV LO K) to i CO o i C
O
m
C3*
r
CO
^-
1 L^
" m
^S
1 I
S
en S -
S T
O ?-
-c
"*CO
^o
l — l
Z ~
00
Is
l00
i ID
8 5-
^i
j i
i "^
3 K
a-i
1 i
l U
, i
, l
CO
\ \ 1 1 1/
, y
f ^"^
^[
{\
"~"-
--^.
\
^s
\ \
\ \ \
i ii
i i
i \ i /1
i '
i )9"
o s
m
D Se
n o
0 5
8^
b s^
or^
nc
1 ri
c'o
PR
OFI
LES
^
loj
05
m n
~ ir.
?o
"?
-S
*
C
O7C"| _
T
^T. U
T
—J
-1*1*—
' -n
N -
. m
-TJ?
^
Z
(0
QS.
r. i-
S- ^n
S*
10 5
zo
o ic
t7
i—
""
Q,
CD
W~*
J
S
m
H *-*
i-n
n*
— *
^r^
r^
^^
o.30
^ m
f**
l ™*
^
? ^"^
o0
^
5aj
|7^n m
30
*
m " ^
rn
^
aim
CO
f f
wN
)
S o CO o ~n 3 ~ "* C t o l-** o l m b i ?- CO f. ID e in l ^ 6 o (J 3 S. ft*
1 1 :
w 8 LO I CO s D LO M to i (J! 1 C
O
rn
Ss
4m
^sX
I ?o
11
CT 3 ?0
-D i*
3H
H.
n-C CO
-,
o1 —
1 ^ ~
^( —
) C
107
s CD
3 R a 0
??
t f o.-
o o"
8 S
2P
, i
"n
i i
i i
"D
l ,
i U
)
"•N
.
^ /
f
f
\
\
\
\
\
\ s s \ \ \^-.
^
\ 1
i i
i i
y
i '
|3S
ST
J
L '
L^
8 S
^1P
RO
FILE
S
? le
o
n"m
" o
* -*
-.^
z-0
""
^
-^•p
tj zc
o^
_
3:--
en
X-i*'
* o
-.
"^
s o-
r* s
3."
w z
^
B
- "
^ f H
- ^
2. ^?
-.^o
o^
ro^
""S
* S
o
^
* g
- <
rnw
z "^
^ n
'
' 5Q
^ S?
n *
m
,
aim
to
T o
wK
)
EASTER z en rn Q no n ~"
"^ CO i — i
o CO
1 c 1 G
B'
LO
- i- LO S LO g LO i LO i CO LO i LO 1 LO rt it z ^ t? 0
CD 70 i i ?.
" " ^2o
rs
)
ro K)
3 i
\
9 0 ——
—
It
t
o* !
~n i
n. ;
o
8 9
^i
i i
i n
ut
ai
i i
i vJ
l ,
i l tO
1 \ \ \\ y i \
} x) ; ;
y \\
\ ' ^N
y y i i i i \ \ i il i
'l r
- l
X3
o
gm
1 i
' i
i — i
en
o ~"
Q
8""*
Q "
H
3?
PRO
FILE
S
5 zaj
O"m
"
~
-1-
|TI
—
~
~T
^
??
TJ
2c
o*"
,-
3
f- S
u x^
' a
r-
-TQ"5
^
M *
^"n:
*-i
Jj'o
i "o
S30
5
"
C3
.- ^
Q-
T1 *
2 ^
w
Z3ic
J"
F-
CL
CD
W
- sg
s'lS
w S
co
m m
Si S
*"*
-^c
^
n o
Q-
^D^
O fc
"' ^
r^i
m x
"? "L
? *^
Tn
,—
i
H-* Q
^w
—^ 0
1 tt
^^
i1 yn
fn*
S!!
m
ow
-
1 3
K)
m CD a -n 3" f (1 o -1 l m Of -i T CO n a u q^ o 3 O
O Oi s. a
m
:o CO —i
m X3 z en m Q 13 n: ^ CO i — i
o CO
c l
•sj
o LO |.
LO en 8'
CO LO S o CO I LO i CO 1 LO n ID
z —i 77
i? o
77 OD i? -.2 o N
)s^ K
)Is
)
3 3 9 b) i 3E i
D
0b
1
Ri
OQ
i
g2
Bilil
U
l ,
i (-0
x \
\
\
\
\ 1 l \ )/
S ^\\ 1
1 1
/l 1 i 1 1 l \ \ 11
y
S '
Pb
- fe^
1 L
' U
^8
3^
PRO
FILE
S
5
loo
O
i " -
n:
lii't/in
^
j 3D
^
1 1 c
n n
e* ^^
*^g
-w
x *
^ 3
'
~TI
-.
..
f
D -
, ^^
w S
5 i-i
B
IL
X
l~~l
V b
""5
^
m
f" Q
'ic"
j'
—"0
.03
"!3
*m
— "^
lCT
) ^
CO
0"m
fB"t
JlO
'"'
-^^
l"^ 0
0Q
- 33
* Z
7" S
— n
^^
2O^
gtn
H —
rnx
tfin
CO
T
i"*
N]
3-
LO
i
8
s (tn
\ \ \\ \
\
7 \ \ 'fl SCO
8
PR
OFI
LES
rn
^ co -H rn 73 Z en
rn
Q
TJ 1C -•c CO o CO
It
Z ,.
it o
n T3
— *
— m
Oi
b —
-~
— -
i w
CI
-. —
T
TI N
—
n,8
* •e
Si! r
, ^
Q- 5" 3
o Is)
-. "s* cnn ~
o
l T)
*) 3
j l
^* (9
!- H
.*
tnrt
CO m
^ TD m CO
— 8"T
I
I I
Sffl -l
LO /
\
f
\ \\ \
\\ \
\
n5^
Sen
8 9
PR
OFI
LES
rn
Dfr co -H rn 3D Z en
rn
a co
t—t
o CO
itz ^
- "
" ^
?S 7
s
n--
Q.
l ? l 3
W
^.-
s o
5f
" ^
^ en
rt
S o
w
O en
m ID-
3d m CO
S O a n t-K
O T m 01 -i LO n n ut - o D O O tt i a
EASTERN
CD m
Q HO :r CO 1 — 4
o CO
i i ! .
I CO ^J CO co LO | CO cB CO fo 8 CO i CO 1 LO n ti ID
Z
— i
IB i^ CD 7a
?-
-(0 o M K
)
D ?
,
},
S 0
3C
T
C
0
t "i
J B
n - ?i
8 S
?
s S
t±i
1 ,
1 O
8 8m
i ,
i LO \
\ y / V N y xX
x ^N
^x
l \4
^
i l
\N\ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ 1 1 ; i i V
i --
r-
T L
^
is '
cS^
g '
5^P
RO
FILE
S
2
zoo
O
Iffg
S
5•T j
^r-
^ 2
yi,
""S
?
5
(D
Q
^
CL
7^*2
3,
. ^
W
Z5
"*— ''
"T (O
^,
3 *
^ ^
, ^*
f—
s O
D
to a"
mJT
5S
" ^
^ x
2 o
aa.
^3
i g^*
3 r
n -n
16 S
^Ti
S
*.
-i '
'3
ui
ra
COT
3
K)
s o 3 3 ~ S S ft M*
0 -1 m t; CO
A A A in o -i o 3 O O tt i b
EASTERN
CD rn
o ~D,
u: CO 1 — 1
o (f)
1 1
8 CO g LO I en y 8 LO *. 8 LO LO g LO g
LO ^ to
n tt n z (— "tA ?s O
) 7o ii "*. -*2
Z
-v^ o ^.
N)
Ki
-J i
y
9 b i— 3 -
n c
* !
-n? X ! si
8 52
. 1
i 1
M
ffi 8M
i i
i i
~0
i Ss
i .
i CO
f f '
\\ 1 1 (
) )
' x
1' l
SS s \ \\
1 1 ^
N \ 1 l V\
i '
S8en
8
-0
L '
L 3
8 8^
PRO
FILE
S
2
zoo
0^m
" ^
^
^
2^
i cn
n ^
? *
""*?
rt"
^
1 **
H
IVi
f ^
*
^ *
* ^
\ f~
*l ^
^
I to
"i
J1 ~
* ~
r ^,
^
T s
" 2
0
^
^
|J~
Q i
t—* o
73
*? H
*
m,
Ull
i C
Om
O
W
*i
SM
B
"CO
\ \ \ \\\\
\
l l
; \ \
8
PR
OFI
LES
m
^ CO —i
rn 3D Z en
rn
a •n CO 1——
4
O
CO
rtz -H
..
"
o 1-0
g
DDm
0
-0 en
n
rn
aim
O CD m 30 m CO
1 3 S t" n o -i f m
o T tf iences. ^ S o Canada
i c i i -
l'
g CO CO en CO eo CO en l CO i CO 1 CO
m
2LO
zl
m "
g
xi J
" g
en i Ir
31
?.
"
-C
CO
-,o
i— i
z C
O
DV
' K
)CO
-- K
) C
i)
3 J 9 b *—
^4
~n
hb
An
* o
c
R
p ~
^
K S
-
i ,
i CO s
\ 1 l 1 s y \ \ \ \ 1 \
i ^.
'f i
x\ 1 ^
( "X
XN
f l \ \ 1
g |S
1 1
' 1
t — 1
S
813
g 5^
PR
OFI
LES
Tj
^ r
p
f— \
|n,
"S"
^
^
z11
oln
,' V
2
T?'0
m
m
C!
j fc
m ^
"
|y*
Q^
^ i
O
Q-
X)
^en
n rf-
p
r,'
m*
enS
p
w1
3fO
Resistivity(ohm-m)
RES IP 20K 20
10K.I 9.8.
OJ
Chargeability (mV/V)
10+003
Filter
[1=1 0=2
0=3
0=4
n=5
n=6
10*00 S
Filter
n-1
n=2
0=3
0=4
0=5
0=6
IP RES .20 20K
-9.8 L.10K
.0 uO
9+OOS 5*005 7+00 S 6*OOS 5+OOS 4*OOS 3+OOS 2+00 S 1+00 S1838 1903 1895 1707 9681
1379 -x- 179 -__ 407 —— 820
19K 13K 13K 12K 5912 9085 8315 5454 5632 5213 8838 16K
79K — 3974 ^ 4784O-^—N15K ^ 9966 -—- 15K 3205 — 2977
25*5 C: 4202 4903 .X 9346.' ) '1470
18K
5331
. 1473\\y\i4479 4286 ^ ) .870
4671 2418'-^818——"l
9+OOS 8+OOS 7+00 S 6*OOS 5*OOS 4*OOS 5+OOS 2+00 S 1+00 S1.9 2.4 3.3 7.9
7.5,
11 12
J 4 i- 2 '14
16
13
;yi^}\i / s\-\ ^—o\\xr~^1.4 J 3 ,8 1 1 1 4 18//B.3I ) 20 23 \\3.8/s s//yf \ -^xo f \v\\i1.6 ,X3.5VO 12 14 .^5.8 /y 14 27 23 \\Jrrxvx/ - f \ vv
\Z S .-H///
9.2 6.t 3.7 3.6 2.7 2.4 3.3 3.6
5.1 65
0*00
Filter
0=1
n-2
0=3
0=4
0=5
0=6
0+00
Filter
0=1
0=2
0=3
0=4
0=5
n-6
Topography
Resistivity(ohm-m)
Chargeability(mV/V)
Filter*
* *x c *
* * * *
Line 300 E
Dipole-Dipole Arrayna
a = 50 M-s'
plot point
Logarithmic Contours 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10,.
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONSReceiver:
Settings:ELREC IP-6Delay Time 160 mSec.M1^ 140 mSec. ^ 1 60 mSec.l^ 160 mSec. M^ 1 60 mSec.M5^ 160 mSec. Mfc 1 60 mSec.1^ 160 mSec. M8= 160 mSec.M9^ 160 mSec. M^ 160 mSec.
Transmitter: Phoenix IPT-1 3 kW Settings: 2 Sec. on/off Time
8 Sec . Total Duty Cycle
Generator: Phoenix MG-2 2.5 kVA
Scale 1:500050 A , 50 - - 100 150, - 200 - 250- - 300
(meters)
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYHess Grid
Cartier, Ontario
Date: 01/02/21 Operator: M. ParentNTS ref: Baseline Azimuth:
Prepared by: B. d'Eon
Eastern Geophysics Limited
RES 15K
IP
7635J 6.3,
Resistivity(ohm-m)
Chargeability(mV/V)
Oj Oj
IP RES .13 15K
.6.3 L7635
.0 LO
10+00 SFilter
0=1
o-2
n=3
n-4
n=5
0-6
10*005
Filter
n-1
0=2
0=3
0=4
0=5
n-6
9+OOS WU S—i—i—f- 7+00 S 6+OOS 5*OOS 4+COS 3+OOS 2+00 S 1+00 S
9+OOS ft+OOS-l——l——l——l——l——l——I- 7+00 S 6KXJS 5+OOS 4+OOS 3+OOS 2+00 S 1+00 S
9.10.08 0.4* 1.1 2.5 5.2 6.3 9.4
-0.03- -0.36 -073 -0.0100 ,. 3.4 , 9 .9
-1.1 -1.J -1.4 !! M
4 0.82 -1 -1.9 -1.8 -0.97 0.28 2.2
-0.96 -0.021 -0.13 0.043 v 1.5s. N 5'.'( \V
-2.3 -1.1 -1.1 -1.1 .0.91 1.5.\
7.3 10
-i.9 -4.6 -3.6 -3.1 -0.30 x v\ 1.2
-8.5 -i.3 -3.2 -Z.2 -0.1B
-7.8 -2.S -2.1 -1.8
-4.4 -1.5 -1.6
0+00
530 973 1566 3562 8842 13K 12K 13K 5287 5599 3317 2381 2557 2647 2877 3366 4001 14K
.2180 — 3256^ vx9!4 730 l W y B1 v-._.* J-v "S ^ -f* 2Mt -\\ M
6997 5937 \V 541 —— 476 \ 73 -—— \S;^3St^/ 1 337 2942
'2491 . //'m ' 9021 . 3192 V\ 293-—279 ^- *Q^**^— f l*2 1462
1237 " 7955 ^ 12K// 4129 1573 Y\ IsT"^). •m^^'^. 2878 .^ 1188
9447 7994 — 5153 J 1 818 88fl.
Filter
0=1
o-2
0=3
0=4
0=5
0-6
0+00
Filter
0-1
0=2 0=3 0=4 0=5 0-6
Topography
Resistivity (ohm-m)
Chargeability(mV/V)
Filter
Line 500 E
Dipole-Dipole Arrayno Q
* * * ** 4 * * *
* t * * 4
Logarithmic Contours
\ x , ' a = 50 M \ f'
plot point
1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10,..
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
Receiver: ELREC IP-6Settings: Delay Time 160 mSec.
M1^ 140 mSec. k^ 160 mSec. M^ 160 mSec. f^ 160 mSec. M5= 160 mSec. M6^ 160 mSec. M7^ 160 mSec. M8= 160 mSec. h^ 160 mSec. M10* 160 mSec.
Transmitter: Phoenix IPT-1 3 kW Settings: 2 Sec. on/off Time
8 Sec. Total Duty Cycle
Generator: Phoenix MG-2 2.5 kVA
Scale 1:500050 O 50 100 150 200 250 300i"j"*jr ~ - "".""y ri-'i"1-'f-'tiiruTr
(meters)
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYHess Grid
Cartier, Ontario
Date: 01/02/22 Operator: M. ParentNTS ref: Baseline Azimuth:
Prepared by: B. d'Eon
Eastern Geophysics Limited
RES IP 29K 19
l
1
14K. 9.7.
1
O. 0.
Resistivity 74(ohm-m) Filter
0=2
0=3
0=5
0=6
Chargeability 7*(mV/V) Filter
0-1
0=2
0=3
0=4
0=5
0-6
::K^Xi i i i i i i i i i i l i i i iS. i i J —— \ — t — * \ "~i iiit
LAKE.
•DOS p 6+pOS ( 5+pOS f WWS|r 3*00 S f 2+00 S 1+00 S 0+00m 1 4K 11K 7311 6B81 4190 SK 3246 3425 3441 8808 IOK
34K N. I3K - 17K / 1 ?K *^ 1flK ^ 7822 ^ 4M — —— 204 759 ?774 17K 14Jf
31K Vs UK 12K 9383 — 7806^/^353 7005EE916 ^s 307^^2538 ^\ 17K
1 1 f /sl^fc^-ijffi/ s \\X?^10K 1 2321^: 137^ 181^r 77*1 -- 1CK -~. 8378 X 1762
* '7 f f f if ^ U.T "SZ&FJ* * * ' ' ^*^ \3087 ' *' 197 " — 185 *r*' 441A v 11K I3K 5815
OOS | 6*00 S | ( 5*pOS ( 4tOOS | 3^S r 2+00 S 1+00 S 0+0011 12 15 18 15 6.6 2.6 -0.46 0.22 0.40 1 2
9.4 8.6,, 15 28 26 i y 4.1 3=2.5 v^ -1.5 0.49 ^ 2.3 ^ 4 3.9
9 J 1 4 J 30 —— 30 20 \U-0.78 "^1.M\ -2.5 0.88 — .1.8 ^^ 3.6
18 .^13 '7 \ 7 -L^^.5'^^^"2 ' 8 0' 07J "4 "1 " 1p *
13 /•X"^N\- 14 llf^3j\j7"^\-2 * -O*4 -*-5
8.5 — 7—^ -O.Oa'^IO 15^^-2.2 -0.35
IP RES .19 .-29K
r9.7 -14K
lr0 -0
Tosography
Resistivitypi|ter (ohm-rn)
0=1
o-2
0=3
0=5
0-6
Chargeability niter (mV/V)
0-1
0=2
0=3
0=4
0=5
n-6
Line 700 E
•r ' lter Dipole-Dipole Array* i a no a
* * * r\.. jOi* * * * l — — l l — — l
****** \ , ' X \ ^7 a = 50 M
Ncf plot point
Logarithmic Contours 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10,. .
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
Receiver: ELREC IP-6 Settings: Delay Time 160 mSec.
M^ 140 mSec. Iv^ 160 rnSec. M^ 1 60 mSec. M4= 1 60 mSec. Iv^ 160 mSec. M6^ 160 mSec. M7^ 160 mSec. MQ= 1 60 mSec.M9- 160 mSec. M 10- 160 mSec.
Transmitter: Phoenix IPT-1 3 kW Settings: 2 Sec. on/off Time
8 Sec. Total Duty Cycle
Generator: Phoenix MG-2 2.5 kVA
Scale 1:500050 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
(meters)
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY Hess Grid
Cartier, Ontario
Date: 01/02/22 Operator: M. Parent NTS ref: Baseline Azimuth:
Prepared by: B. d'Eon
Eastern Geophysics Limited
ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES
Transaction No:
Recording Date:
Approval Date:
Client(s):116945
Survey Type(s):
W0170.30695
2001-SEP-12
2001-DEC-05
Work Report Summary
Status: APPROVED
Work Done from: 2001-FEB-01
to: 2001-SEP-12
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD.
IP
Work Report Details:
Claim#
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
1210838
1210839
1210840
1210841
1210842
1224157
1229424
1230847
1231178
1231179
Perform
SO
sososoSO
310,504
S256
S3, 330
52,820
S8.710
525,620
Perform Approve
SO
sosososo
S10.760
SO
S3.330
S2.820
S8.710
S25.620
Applied
S800
S6.400
S4,800
S1.600
S2.400
SO
SO
SO
SO
soS16.000
Applied Approve
S800
S6.400
S4.800
S1,600
52,400
SO
SO
SO
50
SO
516,000
Assign
SO
sosososo
S884
S256
53,330
52,820
58,710
516,000
Assign Approve
0
0
0
0
0
1,140
0
3,330
2,820
8,710
S1 6,000
Reserve
SO
SO
soso50
S9.620
SO
50
SO
SO
S9.620
Reserve Approve Due Date
SO 2002-SEP-12
SO 2002-SEP-12
SO 2002-SEP-12
SO 2002-SEP-12
SO 2002-SEP-12
59,620 2002-APR-20
SO 2002-JUN-10
SO 2002-APR-20
50 2001 -DEC-09
SO 2001 -DEC-09
S9.620
Status of claim is based on information currently on record.
41I12NE2017 2.22048 HESS 900
2001-Dec-11 03:20 Armstrong-d Page 1 of 1
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Date: 2001-DEC-06
Ministere duDeveloppement du Nord et des Mines Ontario
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE 933 RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, 6th FLOOR SUDBURY, ONTARIO P3E 6B5
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD. 2005-9TH STREET, S.,W., CALGARY, ALBERTA T2T 3C4 CANADA
Tel: (888)415-9845 Fax:(877)670-1555
Dear Sir or Madam
Submission Number: 2 .22048 Transaction Number(s): W0170.30695
Subject: Approval of Assessment Work
We have approved your Assessment Work Submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached Work Report Summary indicates the results of the approval.
At the discretion of the Ministry, the assessment work performed on the mining lands noted in this work report may be subject to inspection and/or investigation at any time.
Assessment work credit has been redistributed, as outlined on the attached Work Report Summary to better reflect the location of the work.
If you have any question regarding this correspondence, please contact LUCILLE JEROME by email at [email protected] or by phone at (705) 670-5858.
Yours Sincerely,
Ron GashinskiSupervisor, Geoscience Assessment Office
Cc: Resident Geologist
Champion Bear Resources Ltd. (Claim Holder)Seymour M Sears (Agent)
Assessment File Library
Champion Bear Resources Ltd. (Assessment Office)
Visit our website at http://www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm Page: 1 Correspondence 10:16640
o oCN
K X
•^t! W i m.- -- g\rr*PJiC-*T - -*H.S'y f *':^—.-ri
, f.nK* rdtie *i*iuy Ji wrtnern En?, aiapp*
nkiid Itrjiijtl III* kjcwlwirii IHtoi iw R fylDlr
efal Infofrnatlon and Limitationsw^H fkuJiiiij mm*.lk:nfiti*3 j i ufrnria'i ITT If.i iJ rdnl- *l4ft C iMTan ixin ^•IFR dn
MINING LAND TENURE
MAP
Date ; Time ot Issue Sep 12 2001
TOWNSHIP/AREA
HESS
16;C3h Eastarr
PLAN
G-4062
ADMINISTRATIVE D ISTRICTS J1 DIVISIONSMining Division Sudbury
Land Titles'Registry Division SUDBURY
Ministry o1 Natural Resources District SUDBURY
TOPOGRAPHIC
D ' •••'
Q ..-.. s ..
LAND TENURE
"S™1 ..-.,,., s ,.Q
m"g"
Q G Q
eQ
LAND TENURE WITHDRAWALS
IMPORTANT NOTICES
LAND TENURE WITHDRAWAL DESCRtPTfONS
J IMS iEtl'j'VLL rrajrtH 04T *il*T ms?i nlK^ Mu'iLi itihnlLiiiitiM
Sb^lS W L.: C !l
h***i rteitftc i
WLL J01 Ww
lundirv li 11 m ay flu hrraiiii rfw •.*rnJ[(n*fl
ItKIV IC-Q^ltl.^ y iiliLS Itnlji w*h^imu^
Cc m*,. JIL.M P nn m , l" Ulilt Tin* U illiUu F 4.
4n u Nm^io beyciuilliiiWllidraMlOr
IMPORTANT NOTICES
APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)
••'Ut.
Gradient Array-AB-
MN l MSLL-r, ^\ ' \ ",
plot paints
Scale 1:5000O 50 100 150 200 250 300
(metres)
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD.HESS GRID
ERMATINGER TWP., ON
TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEYGradient Array
APPARENT RESISTIVITYAB= 1600 metres
Transmitter Frequency Transmitter Current Decoy Curve:
Station Interval: Resistivity Contour Interval: Colour Scale:
O.O525 Hz (5035 duty cycle) 1.0 Amps
Semilogarithmic Windows 10 Gates
50 metres10 levels/log decode
Equal Area Zoning
Survey Date: Instrumentation:
Jan. - Feb. 2001Rx ^ IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)
Tx ^ Phoenix IPT-1 * Hondo 1.5
Surveyed # Processed by: MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.
DWG. |: QS-160-PLAN-RES-1
41I12NE2Q17 2 .22048 HESS 210
TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)
\
-N
Gradient Array————— AB —————
"x'.. \.
50 O
^r---V ' N ' -'~.-•st*—*c-
plot points
Scale 1:500050 100 ISO 200 250 300
(metres)
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD.HESS GRID
ERMATINGER TWP., ON
TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY Gradient Array
TOTAL CHARGEABILITY AB= 1600 metres
Transmitter Frequency Transmitter Current Decoy Curve:
0.0625 Hz (507. duty cycle) 1,0 Amps
Semilogarithmic Windows 10 Gates
Station Interval: 50 metresChargeability Contour Interval: 0.5, 2.5 mV/VColour Scale: Equal Area Zoning
Survey Date: Instrumentation:
Jan. - Feb. 2001Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)
Tx = Phoenix IPT-1 * Hondo 1.5
Surveyed 4 Processed by: MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.
DWG. j : QS-160-PLAN-CHG-1
41112^2017 2.22048 HESS 220
INTERPRETATION PLAN MAP
<
N
LEGEND
Nil
H
\
Very Strong IP Signature and respective Resistivity Association
Strong IP Signature and respective Resistivity Association
Moderate IP Signature and respective Resistivity Association
High Resistivity Axis and respective IP Association
Nil/Contact Resistivity Axis and respective IP Association
Low Resistivity Axis and respective IP Association
Zone of Geophysical Interest — Increased IP
High Resistivity Zones — Low Porosity Unit
Interpreted Geological Contact or Fault
1st Priority Target (DDH or Follow-up Recommended)
2nd Priority Target (Follow-up Recommended)
2.22
Gradient Array———— AB ————
MN MN
25 O
o o plot points
Scale 1:250025 50 75 100 125 150
(metres)
41I12NE2017 2.22048 HESS 230
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD. HESS GRID
TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY
Gradient Array INTERPRETATION PLAN MAP
ABs 1600 metres
Transmitter Frequency Transmitter Current Decay Curve:
Station Interval:
Interpretation by:
0.0625 Hz (SON duty cycle) 1.0 Amps
Semilogarithmic Windows 10 Gates
50 metres
G-Ka l (fa
Date: Instrumentation:
Jan. -Feb. 2001Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)
Tx * Phoenix IPT-1 * Honda 1.5
Surveyed A Processed by:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.DWG. tt: QS-160-P LAN-l NT-1
TOTAL CHARGEABILITY (mV/V)
41I12NE2017 2.22048 HESS240
10.810.29.79.39.18.78.48-27.97.77A727.06.86.6646.26.05.85.6S.35.26.04.74.54.34.13.93.6343.12,8221.81.3
Gradient Array
AB-nv-
j MN!
2.220 4Scale 1:2500
25 O 25 50 75 100 125 150
(metres)
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD. HESS GRID
TIME DOMAIN IP SURVEY
Gradient Array TOTAL CHARGEABILITY
^ 1600 metres
Transmitter Frequency Transmitter Current
Decay Curve:
Station Interval: Chargeability Contour interval: Colour Scale:
0.0625 Hz (50* duty cycle) 1.0 Amps
Semilogarithmic Windows 10 Gates
50 metres0.5, 2.5 mV/V
Equal Area Zoning
Survey Date: Instrumentation:
Jan.-Feb. 2001Rx s IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)
Tx ^ Phoenix IPT-1 * Honda 1.5
Surveyed A Processed by:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGffiS LTD.DWG. ft QS-160-PLAN-CHG-1
APPARENT RESISTIVITY (ohm-metres)
63346.48368.39220. 33579. 28685. 24867. 21779. 19612. 17283. 1S379. 13919. 12413. 11071. 10020.8916.7896.7075.6197.5372.4589.3929.3188.3435.1706.
Resistivity (ohm-tn)
Gradient Array———AB——————0———
2.22048o o pkrt points
Scale 1:250025 50 75 100 125 150
<
41I12NE2017 2.22048 HESS 250
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD. HESS GRID
TIME DOMAIN) IP SURVEY
Gradient ArrayAPPARENT RESISTIVITY
s 1600 metres
Transmitter Frequency Transmitter Current Decay Curve:
Station Interval: Resistivity Contour Interval: Colour Scale:
0.0625 Hz (501; duty cycle) 1.0 Amps
Semilogarithmic WindowslOGates
50 metres10 levels/tog decade
Equal Area Zoning
Survey Date: Instrumentation:
Jan. -Feb. 2001Rx = IRIS IP-6 (6 channels)
Tx ~ Phoenix IPT-1 * Honda 1.5
Surveyed S, Processed by:
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGffiS LTD.DWG. tt QS--60-PLAN-RES-1