green practices in electrical system - ciigbc© confederation of indian industry electrical system...
TRANSCRIPT
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Electrical System
vEnergy efficiency measures will add $505
billion to India’s gross domestic product
(GDP) between 2009 and 2017
vImmense energy efficiency potential
possible
vAround 2500 MW of energy savings
possible only in electrical system
1
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Generators
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Improving Power Factor Of Generator
vCan generator be operated in higher power factor than the design value?ØYES
vUsually designed for 0.80 PF lag as specified by standards
vLower power factor demands higher excitation currents and results in increased losses
2
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Alternator Capability Curve
Source: Cummins Power
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Improving Power Factor Of Generator
vHigher power factor
ØLower excitation current
ØHigher alternator efficiency
ØHigher generation due to higher efficiency
vAt the least, 0.4% efficiency improvement
possible by improving PF from 0.8 to Unity
3
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Improving Power Factor Of Generator
vTGs rated forØ30 MW & 37.50 MVA
vOperating at 0.80 PF
96.9196.03%25% Load98.1897.59%50% Load98.597.98%75% Load98.5698.08%100 % Load0.990.8Efficiency @ P.F
© Confederation of Indian Industry
vImproved PF in steps
ØEfficiency improved by 0.59%
vAction Taken:
ØImproved power factor from 0.80 to 0.99 in steps
vReduced the excitation slowly
ØInstalled additional capacitor banks to meet
kVAR requirement
Improving Power Factor Of Generator
4
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Improving Power Factor Of Generator
Annual Saving - Rs 35.0 Lakhs
Investment - Rs 38.0 Lakhs
Simple Payback - 14 Months
© Confederation of Indian Industry
TransformervIndustries are the not the only one
which has transformersØA Cell phone chargers also does
© Confederation of Indian Industry
TransformervA quick calculationØTotal mobile phones in India = 300 million
(According to IDC reports)
ØAssuming 10% of people are habitual of leaving chargers on = 30 million
ØAssuming the charger is left on for 10 hrs for 365 days a year
© Confederation of Indian Industry
TransformervA quick calculationØCharger consumes 0.5 W power
ØEnergy Loss per year = 55000 MWhvAccording to NokiaØ switching off cell phone charges can save
power equivalent to power consumed in 66,000 European homes
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Transformer Efficiency
vEnergy Efficiency in transformer system
ØTechnology up gradation
ØFine Tuning of system
vTechnology up gradation
ØAmorphorous Transformers
vFine Tuning of System
ØTransformer Loss Calculation
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Transformer Loss Calculation
132 KV Breaker
50 MVA11 KV / 132KV
80% Loaded
50 MVA11 KV / 132KV
No Load
Bus Coupler
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Transformer Loss CalculationvLosses – from test certificateØIron loss = 25 kW
ØFL. Copper losses = 225 kW
Loss calculation
vOne transformer in operation
(25) + 225 x (0.80) 2 = 169 kW
vAdditional loss in stand by transformerØ25 kW – Iron loss
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Transformer Loss Calculation132 KV Breaker
50 MVA11 KV / 132KV
40% Loaded
50 MVA11 KV / 132KV
40% Loaded
Bus Coupler
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Transformer Loss CalculationvBoth transformers in operation
[(25) + 225 x (0.40) 2 ] x 2 = 122 kW
vReduction in loss : 72 kW
Annual Saving - Rs 18.0 Lakhs
Investment - Nil
1
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Distribution
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Distribution Loss – Case Study
vTotal technical & commercial loss in TN
Ø 2011 – 12 > Rs 60,000 Crores
ØNext five years> Rs 1,00,000 Crores
vPunjab State Electricity Board’s (PSEB)
transmission and distribution loss
Ø25%
qDecided to reduce losses
2
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Distribution Loss – Case StudyvReplaced the existing 3-phase 400V Low
Voltage Distribution System feeding Agricultural Pumps, with an 11-kV High Voltage Distribution System (HVDS)vBenefits of the projectØReduction in transmission lossesØEnergy saved could be used by additional
consumersØImproved voltage profile to consumersØReduction in failure of transformers due to over
loading
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Distribution – A Case Study
6 MW
11kV
11kV11kV
Plant A Load
Plant B load
415V415V
415V
1000kVA 1000kVA 1000kVA2500kVA 2500kVA
Tr -2
Tr -3
Plant A Plant B
3
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Distribution – A Case Studyv11 kV feeder of Plant A – Not in operationØCable Failure
vLoad of Plant A catered by Transformer 2 of Plant BvThree level voltage transformation usedØLT – HT – LT
vEach voltage transformation has its own efficiency ØHigher no. of transformations, higher the
lossesØInherent losses of transformers
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Distribution – A Case Study
vAction Taken:ØLoad of Plant A directly connected to
secondary of Transformer 2 of Plant BqInstalled bus coupler and separate breakers at the
secondary of Plant A distribution transformers
ØSwitched off Plant A transformers
Annual Saving - Rs 7.00 LakhsInvestment - Rs 21.00 LakhsPayback period - 36 Months
4
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Voltage Dropv Voltage drop is an indication of distribution
loss
v Causes of voltage dropØ Poor power factor
Ø Inadequate cable size laid
Ø Poor contact surface atq Cable Termination
q Cable joints
q Contactors/Switches
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Voltage Drop
v In a large complex distribution system,
voltage drops are very common
v Acceptable limit in a 3 Ph. System is
4-5 Volts / Phase
vMore than 5 V/Phase indicates energy
loss in the distribution
5
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Case Study-Voltage Dropsv Voltage drop – PCC to MCC
Measurements
q Voltage at PCC = 418 V
q Voltage at MCC = 405 V
q Drop in Voltage = 13 Volts
q Load current = 225 A
q Power factor = 0.6 Lag
q Cable size = 1R x 3C x 300 Sq.mm
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Case Study-Voltage Drops
v Cable loss = 5.1 kW
v Capacitor installed at Load end = 60 kVAr
v Reduction cable loss = 2.5 kW
Annual savings= 0.76 Lakhs
1
© Confederation of Indian Industry
LoadsMotor - Lighting
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Operation of VFD
vVFDs not an universal remedy for energy
efficiency
vVFDs also has efficiency
Ø~96 - 98% efficient
vAt full speed, no energy saving
vEnergy loss operating VFD @ 50 Hz
Ø2% to 2.5 %
2
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Operation of VFD
vA plant operated 20 VFDs at full speed
vAction taken
ØBypassed VFDs at full speed
Annual Saving - Rs 0.90 Lakhs
Investment - Nil
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Motor Efficiency
vEnergy Efficiency in Motors
ØTechnology up gradation
ØFine Tuning of system
vTechnology up gradationØEnergy Efficient motors
vFine Tuning of System
3
© Confederation of Indian Industry
System Fine Tuning
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Power = √3 V I Cos φ
Cos φ is power factor
Capacity α Torque
α Voltage 2
Basic Formulae
4
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Optimization Of Lightly Loaded Motorsv OptionsØ Delta connection to permanent star connection -Steady load applicationØ Automatic star-delta-star converters- for
variable loadsØ Soft starter cum energy savers - High Starting torque applicationsØ Variable voltage devicesØ Down sizingØ Overall voltage optimization
© Confederation of Indian Industry
v Impact on motor operating parameters
ØReduction in voltage dependent losses - Drop in
Magnetization current
ØCapacity reduces
ØPF improves
ØLoad current drops
ØLoad factor improves
ØEfficiency Improves
Capacity α Voltage 2
5
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Automatic Star-delta-starv Principle of Voltage optimizationv Starting torque problems
ØStarting equipment on loadv Now available with DOL changer switch
for starting purpose
Energy Saving Protection
% LStar Mode (Low Load) (High Load) ∆ Mode
Load Sensor
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Automatic Star Delta Star Starters for Belt Conveyors
v Most of the time lightly loadedv Subject to heavy loadØ Rated KW = 90.0KW(3 nos)Ø Actual load = 35.0 KWØ In star mode consumes = 32.0 KWØ Savings in KW = 9.0 KW
Annual savings - Rs 2.8 LakhsInvestment - Rs 1.2 LakhsPayback period - 5 months
6
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Optimise operating frequency A Case study from a Cement Plant
vHas captive power plant – 45 MW
ØOperated in island mode
ØOperating frequency : 50 Hz
vStudied all major equipment
ØCapacity utilisation : 60 – 80%
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Optimise operating frequency vReduced the overall frequency to 49 Hz in
steps of 0.2 Hz ØObserved the operating parametersØNo effect on productionØFound reduction in energy consumption
Annual Saving - Rs 37.0 Lakhs
7
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Lighting System Efficiency Improvement
vImproving Lighting System Efficiency ØTechnology up gradationØFine Tuning of system
vTechnology up gradationØUsage of higher efficacy lampsØEnergy efficiency LED lampsØLight pipesØOptical fibre
vFine Tuning of SystemØVoltage optimisation
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Technology Up Gradation
8
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Latest Technologies – Light Pipe
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Latest Technologies – Light Pipe
9
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Latest Technologies – Fibre OpticsvFibre OpticsØPopular in medical fieldqUsed for lighting in operation theatres
ØSame concept applicable for other applications
vFibre optics in combination with solar PV –an excellent choice
© Confederation of Indian Industry
Latest Technologies – Fibre Optics