inglewood transit connector project pre-bid …

INGLEWOOD TRANSIT CONNECTOR PROJECTPRE-BID CONFERENCE – RFP 0152: APM INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONSULTANT

July 7, 20201

INGLEWOOD TRANSIT CONNECTOR

AGENDA

2

1. Overview of City’s Historic Transformation

2. Background on Inglewood Transit Connector Project

3. Current ITC Project Refinements

4. ITC Project Delivery

5. Scope of Services Requested

6. Evaluation and Selection Process

CITY’S HISTORIC TRANSFORMATION

3


INGLEWOOD’S HISTORIC TRANSFORMATIVE INVESTMENTS

LA STADIUM AND ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT: $4.8 billion LASED MIXED-USE / RETAIL CENTER

INGLEWOOD BASKETBALL & ENTERTAINMENT CENTER:

$1.6 billion

THE FORUM: $100 million

4


LOS ANGELES SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT (LASED)

• State-of-the-art NFL SoFi Stadium (72k seats)

• Performing arts venue (6k seats)

• Public parks and open space (~25 acres), pedestrian walkways, and bike paths

• New retail space (850k+ sf)

• New office space (750k+ sf)

• New residences (2,500 units)

• New hotel (300 rooms) 5


TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) + AFFORDABLE HOUSING

• New TOD Plans will increase density around new Metro Crenshaw/LAX transit stations

• Downtown Inglewood and Fairview Heights Plan

• Westchester/Veterans Plan

• Crenshaw/Imperial Plan

• New Measure H funded affordable/ supportive housing under construction with co-developers Linc Housing and National CORE adjacent to Metro Fairview Heights Station

• Total of 101 units; 50 units for formerly homeless, 50 units for households earning between 30-80% of the area median income, and one manager’s unit

• The City's density bonus ordinance goes beyond state requirements to incentivize even more affordable housing units.

• City has most affordable housing units per capita anywhere in South Bay region! 6

VISION FOR INGLEWOOD TRANSIT

CONNECTOR PROJECT

8


JACKSONVILLEATLANTASAN FRANCISCO

BALTIMORE HOUSTON SEATTLE

LOS ANGELES MINNEAPOLIS CLEVELAND

WORLD CLASS CITIES HAVE WORLD CLASS TRANSIT CONNECTIONS

9


EXPO LINE

CRENSHAW LINE

FUTURE LAWA APM

GREEN LINE

GOLD LINE

RED LINE

PURPLE LINE

BLUE LINE

LACK OF DIRECT REGIONAL TRANSIT CONNECTION TO CITY’S GROWTH CENTER

10


LACK OF DIRECT REGIONAL TRANSIT CONNECTION TO CITY’S GROWTH CENTER

● City must connect existing ½ mile gap between Metro Crenshaw/LAX Line and the sports, entertainment, housing and employment center

● By 2040, ITC Project area is projected to generate 3x the growth rate in population, 2x in households, and 8x as much employment than the County of Los Angeles 11


Independent “Automated People Mover” OperationsInterlined Crenshaw/LAX Line

LA Metro’s Study Key Findings: • Venues are major traffic generators / high event driven ridership• “Single seat” interline spur operations not viable due to complex impacts on Metro mainline• Independent Automated People Mover more appropriate for event venues to handle surges • Public/Private Partnership strategy should be pursued; ITC not a Measure M project

Alignment 2A:

Market –Manchester

Urban Rail/LRT

(At-grade/Underground/ Elevated)

Alignment 2B:

Arbor Vitae

APM/Monorail

(Elevated)

Alignment 2C:

Century Boulevard

APM/Monorail

(Elevated)

Alignment 1:

Fairview Heights

LA Metro LRT

(Trench/Underground)

BACKGROUND: METRO STUDIED FOUR CONCEPTS

12


CITY STUDIED TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS: AUTOMATED PEOPLE MOVER (APM) SYSTEM

Common characteristics for APMs around the country are:

• Elevated guideways to eliminate interference with surface roads

• Automated system - driverless technologies can be operated at shorter (more frequent) headways

• Very short wait times at stations (3 minutes or less)

• Ability to meet peak hour ridership (line capacity)

• Electric-powered cars that will improve air quality and reduce traffic congestion

LAS VEGAS MONORAIL

BART AT OAKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

13


Alignment Alternatives

Option A – Market-Manchester

Option B – Fairview Heights

Option C – Arbor Vitae

Option D – Century Boulevard

Guiding Principles for Preferred Plan:

• Proximity to major City venues (traffic generators)

• Available City amenities to event-based riders

• Avoid/minimize traffic impacts – elevated

alignment

• Preserve future expansion opportunity

• Robust intermodal and transit connectivity

• Activate Downtown Inglewood (Market Street) &

create synergy with City’s economic development

goals

ENVISION INGLEWOOD – BUILDING ON PRIOR METRO STUDIES

14


INITIATED CEQA PROCESS ON PREFERRED ITC ALIGNMENT

Notice of Preparation (NOP) released July 16, 2018

and Scoping Meeting for Initial Study/NOP held July

26, 2018

• ~150 attendees / 27 comments received

• Only 28 comments received; 3 State agencies, 5

Regional agencies and 1 Local agency

Top Issues Raised:

• Environmental Impacts (noise, traffic, air quality,

visual impediments)

• Safety and Security

• Construction Impacts

• Locations of Intermodal Facilities and

Maintenance Storage Facilities

• Community Engagement

15

ITC PROJECT - DESIGN AND EIR

CURRENTLY UNDERWAY

16


• ~1.6-mile elevated automated people mover system with three stations connecting to: • Metro Crenshaw/LAX Line• Downtown Inglewood / Market Street• The Forum• Los Angeles Stadium and Entertainment District (LASED)• Inglewood Basketball and Entertainment Center (IBEC)

• Transit system can accommodate 9,000-12,000+ passengers per hour at peak hours

• Project includes a maintenance and storage facility along Manchester Blvd and joint development opportunity at Market Street

REFINED PROJECT DESCRIPTION

17


VIEW FROM METRO STATION PLATFORM

MARKET STREET STATION CONNECTION TO METRO

18


19


MARKET STREET STATION JOINT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY AS SEPARATE PROJECT

• Proposed uses include ~600,000 square feet of mixed income and affordable housing, commercial uses, parking, and pick-up and drop-off services 20


TRELLIS FLOATING BOX LANTERN SCULPTURAL CANOPY SCULPTURAL TUBE

DESIGN STUDIES – CANOPIES

21


TYPICAL STATION DESIGN / COMPONENTS

22


● Projected annual ridership on the Inglewood Transit Connector Project:

ESTIMATED RIDERSHIP FOR TIRCP APPLICATION

Year Event Non-Event Total Unlinked Trips2026 4,601,841 2,358,157 6,959,9982076 7,931,575 5,974,535 13,906,110

Year Total VMT Reduction2026 30,023,6752076 67,434,551

Project Lifetime 2,322,426,448

● Projected annual vehicle miles traveled reduction generated by the Inglewood Transit Connector Project:

23

Projected Total GHG Emission Reductions: 768,922 (MTCO2e)

ITC PROJECT DELIVERY AND FUNDING

PLAN

24


PROJECTED SCHEDULE AND COST ESTIMATES

ITC Project Cost Estimates

Design and Construction $686 M

Owner Soft Costs and Contingencies $212 M

Right-of-Way Acquisitions $105 M

Financing Costs $13 M

TOTAL $1.016 B

Operations and Maintenance (annual) ~$17.5M

Project Milestones Target Dates

Certification of CEQA EIR and Entitlements March 2021

Acquisition Process March 2021 – November 2021

Award DBFOM Contract December 2021

Design and Construction December 2021 – May 2026

Testing and Commissioning October 2025 – May 2026

Start of Passenger Service May 2026

25


SOURCES OF FUNDS

Metro / South Bay Cities Council of

GovernmentsProject Generated

Infrastructure Impact Fees / Real Estate Developer Contributions

City Funds

Measure R South Bay Highway ProgramFunds

● Farebox (variable pricing for event and non-event ridership)

● Corporate Sponsorship● Advertising● Joint Development

● Parking surcharge/tax during events

● Employee transit payments● Admissions Tax/Surcharge● Access management fees (during

events)● Mitigation package(s)

● Local Business Tax● General Property Tax● Sales Tax ● Short term rental tax (e.g. Airbnb)● TNC and Shuttle Bus access fees● Digital Billboard Advertising

26

Funding Sources Amount (in millions) Percentage

TIRCP (approved) $95.2 9.4%

SBCCOG Measure R Funds (approved, available by June 2021) $233.7 23.0%

Infrastructure Impact Fees / Real Estate Developer Contributions $110 10.8%

City Funds (commitments in progress) $131 12.9%

Private Developer Financing $445.8 43.9%

TOTAL $1,016 100%


Project Delivery

• City is developing a Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain (DBFOM) and Availability Payment

structure for the ITC Project

• DBFOM and Availability Payment structure is focused on:

• Performance/outcome-based specifications

• Private sector innovation

• Lifecycle cost efficiencies

• Developer typically selected competitively on basis of fixed-price, fully-banked proposals. Developer

obligated to complete project and carry out O&M for asset life (20-35 years)

Project Governance

• City is exploring a Community Services District (CSD), a single purpose entity that would be responsible

for permanent governance of the ITC Project and dedicated to overseeing construction and completing

the Project by 2026

PROJECT DELIVERY AND GOVERNANCE STRATEGY

27


WIDESPREAD SUPPORT FOR ITC PROJECT

● Senator Dianne Feinstein

● Congresswoman Maxine Waters

● Senator Steven Bradford and Senator Holly Mitchell

● Assemblymember Sydney Kamlager-Dove and Assemblymember Autumn Burke

● Los Angeles County Supervisors Mark Ridley-Thomas, Janice Hahn and Hilda-Solis

● City of Los Angeles, City Council Resolution; City of El Segundo, Mayor Drew Boyles; City of Carson, Mayor Pro Tem Cedric L. Hicks Sr.

● Los Angeles Rams and Chargers, Stadco Stadium

● Metro, Phil Washington, Chief Executive Officer

● 2028 Olympics Committee, Casey Wasserman

● Caltrans, Los Angeles Department of Transportation, Los Angeles World Airports, South Coast Air Quality Management District, South Bay Cities Council of Government, UCLA, SCAG

● LA/OC Building Trades, Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters, Coalition for Clean Air, MoveLA, Los Angeles Cleantech Incubator, and other labor groups, environmental groups, transit advocates, and City stakeholders including homeowner associations, block groups and local church organizations 28

SCOPE OF REQUESTED SERVICES

RFP-0152: APM INFRASTRUCTURE

ENGINEERING AND DESIGN

CONSULTANT

29


SCOPE OF SERVICES: APM INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONSULTANT

30

● Advance planning and project definition of the APM Civil Works Infrastructure consistent with the requirements of APM Operating System, Architecture and Urban Design requirements

● Develop performance based technical specifications, drawings and other technical requirements as required for incorporation into the DBFOM procurement documents;

● Coordinate with regulatory authorities to obtain concurrence on requirements to comply with applicable codes and standards

● Develop construction logistics/requirements, maintenance of traffic requirements, shut down requirements, work hours, etc;

The selected Consultant will provide a range of technical services to support the City in the definition, procurement and delivery of the Project.


SCOPE OF SERVICES CONTINUED

31

Support the procurement and contract award process, including:

• Provide technical reviews of DBFOM proposals;• Assist with negotiations and contract award to the selected DBFOM Contractor;• Oversee the administration of the DBFOM Contract;

Supporting the City’s program management of the overall Project, including providing reports, findings, recommendations etc. as requested.

• Review of DBFOM Contractor design and other submittals;• Review safety certification and security reviews for the integrated Project;• Oversee operations and maintenance;


EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS

32

• All Proposals that are responsive and meet all the minimum qualifications will be evaluated

• If a Proposal is non-responsive or fails to satisfy any of the minimum qualifications, then the City may reject the Proposal and disqualify it from further evaluation and consideration for award

• The written proposal, and potentially an oral interview, will be evaluated using the following weighted criteria:

1. Cover Letter and Executive Summary 5 pts 2. Proposer Team Organization 25 pts 3. Proposer Team Experience 25 pts 4. Approach and Methodology to Scope of Services 30 pts 5. Cost Proposal 15 pts

Total: 100 pts


PROCESS AND TIMELINE

33

RFP PROCESS AND TIMELINE DAY DATE

Release RFP Monday 6/29/2020

Pre-Bid Conference Tuesday 7/7/2020

Questions Due Friday 7/10/2020

Answers Posted Friday 7/17/2020

RFP Responses Due Wednesday 7/29/2020

Proposer Interviews (optional) Tuesday 8/11/2020

City Council Approval of Selected Term (approx.)

Wednesday 8/21/2020


OTHER KEY ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

34

Agreement• A form of Agreement will be issued via Addendum. Proposers will be required to review and

provide any comments or objections as part of their proposal• Term: 3 years, with City option to extend another 3 years and one optional 2-year extension at

discretion of City Council

Inclusion of SBE/DBE/DVBE: Encouraged, provide a description of your plans in Section 5.5 of the proposal.

For all administrative requirements, please refer to the RFP-0152.

Questions• Submit to [email protected] by July 10th• Responses to questions from the Pre-Bid will be included in the written response to questions• All responses will be posted by July 17th

mailto:[email protected]


THANK YOU

35

inglewood transit connector project pre-bid …

Documents