inthr_(8b) compensation (1)

12
Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan 1 International Compensation Week 8

Upload: rriittuu

Post on 11-Jun-2015

1.203 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

international compensation-objectives,key components & approaches to international compensation.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

1

International Compensation

Week 8

Page 2: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

2

International CompensationWeek 8

• EARLIER TODAY• Objectives for Int’l

Compensation– The Firm’s perspective– The Int’l Employees’

perspective

• Key Components of an Int’l Compensation program

• Two Approaches to Int’l comp ( + pros/cons):

– The Going Rate Approach– The Balance Sheet Approach

• Four special Problem Areas (taxation, COLA,TCN pay)

• Summary

What enables people to perform? ( & What Challenges do Expatriates face when interpretating performance expectations?)

What Challenges do Firms face in accurately appraising international performance?

What additional cultural/ logistical challenges arise in managing international performance?

Page 3: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

3

The Firm’s objectives for Int’l Compensation

• Consistent

• Competitive

• Cost-Effective facilitation of transfers

• Equitable

• Administratively manageable

Page 4: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

4

Int’l Employees’ Objectives for Int’l Compensation

• Financial protection

• Financial advancement

• Logistics

• Career advancement perks

Page 5: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

5

Key Components of an Int’l Compensation Program

• Base Salary• Foreign Service Inducement / Hardship Premium• Allowances

• COLA (Cost of living)• Housing• Home Leave Allowance• Education Allowance• Relocation Allowance• Spousal Assistance

• Benefits

Page 6: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

6

Approaches to Int’l compensation: The Going Rate Approach

(a/k/a the “Market Rate approach”; adapted from Text Table 6-1)

• Based on local market rates

• Relies on survey comparisons among:– Local nationals (HCNs)– Expatriates of same nationality– Expatriates of all nationalities

• Compensation based on the selected survey comparison

• Base pay and benefits may be supplemented by additional payments for low-pay countries

Page 7: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

7

Approaches to Int’l compensation: The Going Rate Approach (con’d)

(Advantages & Disadvantages, adapted from Text Table 6-2)

Advantages Disadvantages

• Equality with local nationals•Simplicity• Identification with host country•Equity amongst different nationalities

• Variation between assignments for same employee•Variation between expatriates of same nationality in different countries• Potential re-entry problems

Page 8: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

8

Approaches to Int’l compensation:

The Balance Sheet Approach• Popularity: Most common system in usage by MNCs• Basis: Home-country pay + benefits are the foundations of this

approach• Objective: Maintenance of home-country living standard +

financial inducement • Home package is adjusted to balance additional expenditure needed in

host country• Financial incentives (hardship/”expatriate” premium) are added to make

the package more attractive

• Main Categories of Outlays:1. Goods & Services

2. Housing

3. Income Taxes

4. Reserve

Page 9: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

9

Approaches to Int’l compensation: The Balance Sheet Approach (con’d)

Advantages Disadvantages

• Equity between foreign assignments for same employee•Equity between expatriates of same nationality in different countries• Repatriation is facilitated by the fact that expat compensation remains anchored to the parent-country compensation system• Simple to communicate

•Not necessarily equality amongst different nationalities – PCNs may get paid more than local nationals (HCNs) or TCNs (expats of different nationalities) for doing the same work•Not necessarily simple to administer• Unclear whether it promotes identification with home or host country

Page 10: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

10

Four Special Problem Areas

1. Taxation– Tax Equalization– Tax Protection

– Not-recommended Variations:» Ad-hoc» Laissez-faire

2. Pension & Other Benefits Issues

Page 11: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

11

Four Special Problem Areas (con’d)

3. Valid int’l living cost data (COLA) (vs. Cost of doing business)

4. Managing TCN compensation

Page 12: IntHR_(8b) Compensation (1)

Copyright 2006, Sharon L. O'Sullivan

12

Points to Reflect On…1. What should be the objectives

of international compensation? How might pay norms/assumptions (about hierarchical pay structures vs egalitarianism, for example) influence objectives?

2. What would be the most important component of an int’l compensation system for YOU?

3. Which of the 2 approaches to int’l compensation makes more sense to you? Why?

4. If you were an expat, how would you like your employer to address the 4 special problem areas? And if you were the employer?