introduction and background of "the river, the bay and the strait" public forum
DESCRIPTION
Presentation at "The River, the Bay and the Strait" public forum on 5 October, 2008 in Hervey Bay.TRANSCRIPT
Introduction to “The River, the Bay and the Strait” Public Forum
5 October 2008
•Does SEQ need a new dam?
•Estuaries, freshwater & today’s presentations
Where the decision making process is at…
• QWI have provided Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement to Qld Govt
• Now with Queensland Coordinator General• Supplementary EIS was “exposed” to the public • Once Queensland Coordinator General hands
his report to Peter Garrett, the Minister has 30 working days for a decision• Four of seven Matters of National Environmental
Significance (MNES)
• Decision is possible by Christmas??
Does South East Queensland need a new dam?
Reason 1:The water isn’t needed
From 2008 SEQ Water Strategy document
2006 2056
Pre
dict
ion
of W
ater
SE
Q w
ill u
se We are paying for a water surplus
Reason 2: There are better alternatives
• Meet domestic and business water needs with less water (I)
• Reduce water use in power generation: Shift to dry cooling in power stations (II)
• Capture of stormwater eg Orange• Recycling • Desalination (III)• Other methods
Supplementary EIS has not addressed these possibilities adequately
Alternative I: smart approachMeet domestic and business water needs with less water
Elements of proposed program and water saved (Mary Council of
Mayors report, 2007)
• Negative Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Average unit cost: $1.15 per 1000 L
TOTALADDITIONAL
SAVINGS190,000ML/a
Alternative II:expanded DM in the power sector• In SEQ, electricity generation accounts for over
6% of total water consumption• The majority lost as evaporation in cooling towers• Alternative to evaporative cooling -
“Dry Cooling” or “Air Cooling”• Similar concept to car radiator• ~95% reduction in water use
• Savings ~40,000 ML/a • Unit cost ~ $1.08 per 1000 L
Source: Qld Govt Dept. of Energy
Alternative III: Desalination
• This was the main alternative that Queensland Government compared with the dam
• Some things to know: • Energy use assumed by Government is about 34%
higher than Kwinana plant in Perth• Cost is of desal inflated, cost of dam deflated• Greenhouse gas emissions are less than proposed
dam (by up to 190,000 tonnes CO2 per year) • Reliable process that can be operated when needed
• Mary council report recommended desal as a “readiness option”, unit cost approximately $2.39 per 1000 kL
Side by side comparison
Dry cooling (II)
Desal (III)
Dam
Smart approach (I)
Cost(per 1000 L) Reliability
GHG(cars)
Dam has worst social and environmental impacts
$1.15 Very High 142,000 cars off the road
$1.08
$2.39
$3.38
Very high
Low
Very high No estimate available
Up to 50,000 new cars
Up to 71,000 new cars
There is not a shortage of better alternatives
But
a shortage of political will to choose the best options from an economic,
environmental and social point of view.
Photo Nikki Michail South Head of the Mary River
A brief introduction to estuaries, why they need rivers and what to expect
from today’s presentations
Photo Stewart Riddel
What to expect…
• Brief Introduction to estuarine ecology• Role of freshwater• Role of nutrients, salinity etc• Impacts on the plants and animals and their
interactions (food web, behaviours etc)
• Brief summary of QWIPL and Qld Government views
• Explanation of how the presentations today relate to the estuarine and river system
Estuaries & Rivers• Estuaries are the downstream reaches of rivers where
they enter the coastal ocean and are influenced by tidal motions.
• An estuary isn’t an estuary without freshwater flow• Estuaries produce approximately 75% of Queensland’s
seafood• Estuaries are some of the most productive ecosystems on
the planet• We have a lot to learn about how they interact• Great Sandy Strait is unique & internationally significant
So what do QWIPL and Qld Government have to say about this?
Currently, the supplementary EIS says:
• “The Integrated Quantity and Quality Model (IQQM) for the Project has demonstrated the reliability of the system to deliver the legislated requirements of the Mary River WRP.”
• “overall it is concluded that the dam will not have any substantial impact upon the values of the Great Sandy Strait Ramsar wetland. The impact is expected to be negligible.”
BUT.. Many important issues not addressed
MO
RN
ING
SE
SS
ION
Sediment
Source: Beach Protection
Authority, 1989
Transport paths ,
sediment source
Mary river
Fraser Island
Continental shelf
AF
TE
RN
OO
N S
ES
SIO
N
Mangroves Seagrass
Dugong
Phyto-plankton
Zoo-plankton
Benthic fish
Fish eating fish
Seabirds
Plant eating fish
Zoo-planktivorou
s fish
Prawns
Crabs
Mud eating fish Green
turtles Benthic Invertebrates
Micro-phyto-benthos
Macro-algae Detritus
Burnett Mary Region Coastal Food web
Adapted from: Gehrke, P.C. 2007. A comparative analysis of coastal fishery food webs in the Great Barrier Reef region. CSIRO: Water for a Healthy
Country National Research Flagship
Whales??
Dolphins
Loggerheadturtles
Key messages from today• The flows from the river play a role that is
complex, intricately balanced. • Application of the precautionary principles
requires the proponent to show they will “not have a significant impact” under the EPBC Act
• Presentations today aim to increase our understanding of this beautiful ecosystem
• With this knowledge our message to Garrett and Bligh will be even stronger
We hope you leave today full of ideas for your own letters to decision makers and full of inspiration to save
the Sandy Strait and the Mary River
Key references
• Peirson, WL., Bishop, K., Van Senden, D., Horton, PR. and Adamantidis, CA., Environmental Water Requirements to Maintain Estuarine Processes (2002), Environmental Flows Initiative Technical Report Number 3, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. (available on internet)
• Beach Protection Authority Queensland (BPA) 1989, Hervey Bay Beaches, Beach Protection Authority, Queensland.
• Gehrke, P.C. 2007. A comparative analysis of coastal fishery food webs in the Great Barrier Reef region. CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship. (available on internet)