many thanks to - canso middle east... · standardization issues. canso an-conf/12 timeline 8-9...

Many thanks to our host

Many thanks to our Lead Sponsor

Opening Addresses

Eng. Hussein MassoudMinister of Civil Aviation

Egypt

Opening Addresses

Paul RiemensCANSO Chairman of the Executive

Board & CEO, LVNL

Opening Addresses

Mohamed KhonjiRegional Director, Middle East Office

ICAO

Opening Addresses

Massimo GarbiniCANSO EC3 Chair &CEO, ENAV S.p.A.

Opening Addresses

Mohey RaghebChairman

NANSC, Egypt

Opening Addresses

H.E. Moh’d Amin Al QuranCANSO MEC3 Chair &

Chief Commissioner / CEOCARC

ICAO Block Upgrade

Eugene HoevenDirector ICAO Affairs

CANSO

A CANSO Perspective

Aviation System Block Upgrades

CANSO Middle East ConferenceCairo, 26-28 March 2012

Eugene Hoeven MBA

Director ICAO Affairs

CANSO Vision

CANSO's Global Vision

identifies the areas of change

needed within the regulatory

and operational domains, as

well as the issues we must

address if we are to achieve a

truly global ATM system

ICAO has recognised that:

Global framework is needed to ensure:Safety is maintained and enhanced ATM improvement programmes are harmonizedBarriers to efficiency and environmental gains are removed

Investment certainty is required for:OperatorsInfrastructure providersEquipment manufacturers

Regulatory approval process must be streamlined Support States in introduction of significant changes

The Challenge of Global Harmonization

Future ATM technologies must be compatible and interoperable (Standards)

Integration of new technologies, systems, procedures and concepts into domestic airspace (mixing new with old)

Regional collaboration and coordination is needed (cross-boundary and multilateral harmonization)

Service Provider and Operator investments required to realize full benefits (infrastructure, avionics, procedures)

ICAO, CANSO and others must continue leadership role in promoting cross-regional harmonization (Block Upgrades)

The ASBUs has been a Team Effort

21

Air & GroundEquipment / Systems

Measurable Operational

Improvement Air & Ground

Standards / Procedures

Positive Business Case

What is a Block Upgrade?

Operational approval /certification

A Block is Made Up of Modules…

…and a Block is Scalableto Meet Regional or Local Needs

25

Understanding the Relationships

Optimum Capacity and

Flexible Flights

Globally Interoperable Systems and

Data

Efficient Flight Path

Greener Airports

Performance Improvement

Areas

Block 0(2013)

Block 1(2018)

Block 2(2023)

Block 3(2028 & >)

ThreadsModules

Threads Between Modules…and Across Blocks

Greener Airports

Improved Approach & Departure Management through Integration

Block 1

Improved Traffic Flow

through Runway Metering

Block 0 Block 2

Linked AMAN/DMAN

Block 3

Integrated AMAN/ DMAN/ SMAN

Global Interoperable Systems & DataThrough Global SWIM

Increased Interoperabil

ity, Efficiency &

Capacity through Ground-Ground

Integration

Block 0 Block 2

Improved Coordination

through multi-centre

Ground-Ground

integration: (FF-ICE/1

& Flight Object,

SWIM)

Block 3

Improved Operational Performance through the

introduction of Full FF-ICE

Block 1

Increased Interoperabi

lity, Efficiency &

Capacity through FF-

ICE/1 application

before Departure


Optimum Capacity & Flexible FlightsThrough Global Collaborative ATM

Improved Flow

Performance through Planning

Based on a Network-Wide View

Block 0 Block 2

Increased User Involvement in

the Dynamic Utilisation of the Network

Block 3

Traffic Complexity

Management

Block 1

Enhanced Flow

Performance through Network

Operational Planning


Efficient Flight PlanThrough Trajectory-based Operations

Improved Flexibility

& Efficiency in Descent

Profiles (CDOs)

Block 0 Block 2

Optimised Arrivals in

Dense Airspace

Block 3

Full 4D Trajectory

based Operations

Block 1

Improved Flexibility

& Efficiency in Descent

Profiles (OPDs)


Global Rollout

ASBU concept introduced at GANIS State Letter consultation on ASBUs – 16 Feb 2012Regional outreach

High Level Briefings – DGCA Meetings plus Symposia5 day workshops with practical implementationPre- AN-Conf/12 Workshop

AN-Conf/12 Paper distributed – 30 June 2012States’ consideration in NovemberWorking Document posted on website

www.icao.int/anconf12/asbu

31

Harmonized ATM - Towards a truly seamless global system

Align firmly with Block concept - Operators & OEMsSynchronized investments in avionics (Roadmaps)Removes need for regulatory mandatesReduces lead time (6 years away)Reduces costsMinimizes Retrofits (very expensive)Integrated Avionics and quicker installation & Certification

Synchronized investments by ANSPs / StatesBlock design recognizes regional differencesReduces complexity of competing safety prioritiesIntegrates Needs of domestic & international operationsRecognizes Budgets“Threads the modules’’

12th Air Navigation Conference

AN-Conf/12, 19-30 November 2012Acknowledge Block 0Agree to Block 1

Block 1 will serve as the enabler and foundation for the envisioned future aviation systems

Endorse the Strategic Direction to Blocks 2 & 3Strategies for longer-term requirementsOpportunity to formalize future infrastructure & equipage

Present revised GANPOperational capabilities to manage ATM system requirements

CANSO comments on Block 1

Budget considerations greater for Block 1Involves technology insertion in ground and/or air

Requires moving to network-based communicationsMany States require substantial infrastructure investment

Regional synchronization issuesEquipage and capabilitiesEssential to successful implementation of future Blocks

Global Standards can mitigate such risks Ensure interoperability between regional ANSPs Offers stakeholders common guidelines

The CANSO Position

Need for STANDARDS NOT MANDATESNeed for Global Interoperability is very clear:

Avionics-Ground system: very long lead timeGround-Ground stakeholders: more connectivity desired

Diverse regional requirements need greater recognition:

Seamless operations require synchronized investment across multiple FIRsMany States have particular needs, priorities, and approaches not always shared by others

The CANSO Position

Unification of Global InitiativesFocus of NextGen, SESAR, CARATS, FIANS, CNAS, et. al.Concentrated, focused, modular, complete

Harmonization of Timeframes and CapabilityGlobally between regions and larger actorsRegionally between neighborsDomestically between States and ATC stakeholders

Business CaseJustification for internal actionCross-organizational stakeholder buy-inSupports Cost-Benefit Analyses

CANSO AN-Conf/12 Preparation

Monthly conference calls of OSC and PSC chairs, ASBU WG Chair, Program Managers, CANSO RDsOSC has committed to drafting the following papers:

GANP, ASBUs and roadmapsData CommunicationsAIS to AIMSWIM evolution pathANSP requirements for UASFlight efficiency and ATM environmental performance

CANSO AN-Conf/12 Preparation

PSC has committed to drafting papers on the following topics:

Policy and regulatory impediments (e.g. sovereignty, funding issues, regulatory approvals, etc.)Implementation incentives/issues (i.e. principles such as “Best equipped, best served”)Standardization issues

CANSO AN-Conf/12 Timeline

8-9 March – proposed topics for working papers agreed during CANSO ATM Operations Conference12-13 March – proposed topics for working papers agreed during 1st meeting of the PSCmid-April – drafting of papers and review of ICAO Secretariat papers when available23-26 June – 1st drafts ready for review during time of the AGM end-July – 2nd drafts ready for review by Standing Committeesend-September – final review and approval of papers; papers submitted for translation30 October – submission of papers to ICAOJune-November – lobby States and stakeholders

CANSO feedback message to ANSPs

Cross-reference your ATM plans with the ASBUsFocus on Operational Improvements, less on TechnologyStart talking to your Regulator NOW!Consult with GA, Military, other stakeholdersLook at training requirements: involve controllers early!Work toward Regional AgreementsFocus on the business case - metrics and CBAs are ‘key’:

InvestmentsMinimize mixed equipage

Address your Safety Net requirements; for example: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA)Airspace re-design

Future Aviation Challenge Team

Develop consensus and advocacy to address impediments to interoperability and implementation

Brings together senior aviation decision-makersTechnical/Operational challenges are considered in the ASBU frameworkPolitical/Economic challenges are much more difficult and an impediment to progress

Develop “One Voice” communications to policy-makers, legislators, stakeholders, general publicPropose a set of operational and financial principles / policies to accompany the ASBU program

To be considered during the AT-Conf/6 in 2013

ICAO Block Upgrade

Matt RileyGeneral Manager Air Traffic Services

Serco

Advise | Design | Integrate | Deliver

Aviation System Block UpgradesCANSO ASBU Work Group / A ME Regional ANSP perspective

Matthew RileyGeneral Manager ATSSerco – Dubai Air Navigation Services

27th March 2012

State Letter FeedbackWhat is CANSO’s role in ASBUs?

Serco Internal

State Letter FeedbackConcerns of States, Industry and

ANSPs

Serco Internal

Stakeholder Feedback

Serco Internal

examples to tie to Modules and Roadmaps

From CANSO Need a mechanism for State feedback, including

the reasons for acceptance/rejection Discussed at TT #8, no determination

provided by ICAO but accepted the idea Needs a globally-harmonized, cross-regional

approach Modules should include Training, Human Factors,

and Procedures section Included and expanded based on comments

ANSPs should be providing ICAO good examples to tie to Modules and Roadmaps

Stakeholder Feedback

From International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations

Non-required vs global interoperability Many metrics are just notional benefits, need value

and measurable benefits SAE Team is going to continue the work

How ANSP can identify bundles of modules

From States Business case needs strengthening, across regions

Expanded but needs more work

Need more clarity in CNS enablers

Add dynamic sectorization module TT – already included in other Modules

Add a Shared surveillance cross FIR module TT determined not to address at this time. This

is a Best Practice

Serco Internal

CANSO Feedback

Feedback to CANSO helped immensely:

A better understanding of ANSP requirements and challenges

Feedback to the Tech Team for ASBU revisions

CANSO now serves as a “global voice’’; the transition to a “Global Partner” needs to take stage now

States and ANSPs to ‘socialize’ ASBUs

Global Best-Practices, in the spirit of “Partnership for Progress”

Serco Internal

The CANSO Position

NOT A MANDATE

Unification of Global Initiatives Focus of CARATS, NextGen, SESAR, FIANS, CNAS, et al

Concentrated, focused, modular, complete

Harmonization of Timeframes and Capability Globally between regions and larger actors

Regionally between neighbours

Domestically between States and ATC stakeholders

Serco Internal

The CANSO Position

Business Case

Justification for internal action

Cross-organizational stakeholder buy-in

Supports Cost-Benefit Analyses

STANDARDS NOT MANDATES

Need for Global Interoperability very clear:

Avionics-Ground system: have a very long lead time

Diverse regional requirements are recognised:

Seamless operations require synchronized investment across multiple FIRs

Many States have particular needs, priorities, and approaches not always shared by others

Serco Internal

Moving forward

If you wait for clearly defined ASBU Module and Roadmap descriptions for exactly what ICAO desires for implementation and harmonization…

If you want all the data and plans to make your job easy…

…you will never get anywhere!

Serco Internal

Challenges to Regional Harmonization

It is critical that future ATM technologies be compatible and interoperable (Standards)

Integration of new technologies, systems, procedures and concepts into domestic airspace (mixing new with old)

Regional collaboration to coordinate modernization technologies and time lines (cross boundary and multilateral harmonization)

Service Provider and Operator investment required to realize full benefits (infrastructure, avionics, procedures)

ICAO, CANSO and others must continue leadership role in promoting cross-regional harmonization (ICAO Block Upgrades)

Serco Internal

State Letter FeedbackWhat does this mean to an ANSP?

Serco Internal

CTAB1-65 - Optimised Airport Accessibility

B1-75 - Enhanced Safety & Efficiency of Surface Operations (ATSA-SURF) & EVS

B1-80 - Optimised Airport Operations

through A-CDM

B1-15 - Improved Apt Ops through Departure,

Surface, and Arrival Management

B1-70 - Wake Vortex Separation - Refined

B1-30 - Service Improvement through Integration of Digital

ATM Information

ToD B1-05 - Improved Flexibility & Efficiency in Descent Profiles (OPDs)

B1-90 - Initial Integration of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Systems into non-

segregated airspace

B1-25 - Increased Interoperability, Efficiency & Capacity though FF-

ICE/1 application before Departure

ToCB1-85 - Increased Capacity &

Flexibility through Interval Management

B1-105 - Better Operational Decisions

through Integrated Weather Information

B1-10 - Improved Operations through

Free Routing

B1-35 - Enhanced Flow Performance through Network

Operational Planning

B1-40 - Improved Traffic Synchronisation and Initial Trajectory-Based Operation

B1-31 - Performance Improvement through the

application of System Wide Information Management (SWIM)

B1-81 - Remotely Operated Aerodrome

Control Tower

Block 1 in Perspective

Serco Internal

State Letter FeedbackThis isn’t just about technology

Serco Internal

Thoughts for going forward

• CANSO should clearly state the desired outcomes of the ASBU initiative

• Serco are working to identify our desired outcomes for the ASBU effort.

• What do our customers need?• What are our customers’ Goals?• Will ASBUs meet them?

• Provide innovation to ICAO, Regions, etc., when an issue is identified by offering examples, alternatives or in some instances solutions

Serco Internal

Key Decisions for CANSO

• Datacom convergence

• SWIM

• Human-in-the-loop challenges (Man-Machine)

• Other decisions• Best-equipped best served• Mandates• Equipment Incentives• Policy• Financial/Economics• RPA integration

• How CANSO can support less capable States implement

Serco Internal

Requests of you

• Read the ASBU documentation

• Feed back to your State

• Feed back to CANSO

• Look for political as well as operational solutions for our region

Serco Internal

Requests of you

Thank you

ICAO Block Upgrade

Hazim A. AbudaowdChair of CANSO MESCC &

Director General, Systems Engineering Directorate

GACA

ASBU Presentation

Formulating ME Regional Position on ASBU

Presentation Outline

Introduction ASBU Modules Selection Factors SESAR & NEXGE Requirements/EnvironmentModule Prerequisites ME Regional Position DevelopmentConclusion

IntroductionASBU Objectives: Facilitate Global Interoperability Ensure Global Harmonization ATM Modernization Utilize current airborne equipage Focus on performance improvements Suite of capabilities “ modules”

ASBU Modules Selection Factors

ICAO Global ATM Operational Concept ICAO Global Air Navigation PlanBlock upgrades are based largely on SESAR NextGenGlobal interoperabilityClear operational rationale &measurable valueCurrent knowledge on the feasibility of the modules

SESAR & NEXGE Requirements/Environment

SESAR & NEXGEN Requirements/Environment

Traffic demandWeather ConditionsAirport Operation Infrastructures CapabilitiesAircraft EquipageAircraft Mixed Capacity Limit R&D capability and Industry support Airspace Definition Phase

Module Prerequisites

Availability of ICAO SARPsConcept definition & Feasibility studyPositive Cost/Benefit Analysis Availability National regulatory frameworks Validation & Operational Trails Safety assessment & Safety case

Module Prerequisites

Stakeholders coordination and cooperationAvailability of new technologies Implementation of the enablers Synchronization of Airborne & Ground systems implementation

What is the status of the Module Prerequisites ?

Globally Interoperable…. SARPs/Procedures… B0

Greener Airport Globally Interoperable Systems and Data

Optimum Capacity and Flexible Flights


GNSS‐based approaches

Ground‐GroundIntegration(AIDC)

Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories

continuous descent operations (CDOs)

Wake Vortex Separation

AIS/AIM Planning based on a Network‐Wide view

application of Data Link En‐Route(FANS1/A)

(A‐SMGCS) Air Traffic Situational Awareness (ATSA)

continuous climb operations (CCOs)

A‐CDM

RunwayMetering

Globally Interoperable…. B1Greener Airport Globally Interoperable

Systems and DataOptimum Capacity and Flexible Flights


Optimized Airport Accessibility

FF‐ICE/1 application Dynamic ATSRouting

ImprovedDescent Profiles

DynamicWake Vortex Separation

Integration ofall Digital ATM Information

Interval Management Improved Traffic Synchronization and Initial Trajectory‐Based Operation.

(A‐SMGCS/ATSA‐SURF)

System Wide InformationManagement (SWIM)

Climb/Descent Procedures usingADS‐B

Remotely PilotedAircraft (RPA) non‐segregated airspace

Optimized A‐CDM prioritization forcollaboratively defining ATFM

Remote Operated Aerodrome Tower

Integrated Weather Information

AMAN/DMAN

What is the status of the Module Prerequisites ?

ME Plan/Definition phase/ATM Requirements? ME Cost‐Benefit Analysis ? ME Stockholders Coordination ? Synchronization of Airborne & Ground systems implementation in ME ? National regulatory frameworks ME Trial Phase/ Safety Case ?

ME Regional Position development

Regional understanding of ASBU Conduct workshop & Seminar on ASBU Develop ME “ Definition Phase “ Develop ME regional Requirements/Plan Conduct Business case Stakeholders coordination & cooperation


GNSS Augmentation ?FANS1/A implementation ?Remote Tower Operation(B1)?Module solutions are not required in all airspacesSome Modules are not necessary in many parts of the worldModule implementation date is not mandated


Use CANSO platform to develop ME Position on ASBU

Develop ME ATM requirements /Plan

Make the necessary preparation for the 12th ICAO ANC


Introduction ASBU Modules Selection Factors SESAR & NEXGE Requirements/EnvironmentASBU Performance Improvement AreasBolck‐1 ModulesBolck‐2 ModulesModule Prerequisites ME Regional Position on ASBUConclusion

ConclusionME ANSP’s need to work together to develop a ME regional position on the ASBU

CANSO is a good platform to help the ME region to have a good understanding of ASBU and to have a ME regional position in the ICAO 12th ANC

many thanks to - canso middle east... · standardization issues. canso an-conf/12 timeline 8-9...

Documents