DOCikiF.NT UMF

ED 023 167By -McDonald, Blair W.; And OthersA Selected Bibliography of Organizational Chmate Studies Relevant to Research Performance.

Richardson Foundation, Greensboro, NC. Creativity Research Inst.

Pub Date Nov 67Note -19p.EDRS Price MF -$025 HC -$105Descriptors -'4Bibliographies, Creativity Research, *Industry, *Organizational Climate, *Performance Factors,

*Research, ScientistsThis selected bibbography of articles and books concerns the effects of

industrial climate on research performance. (1-1W)

EA 001 637

A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF

ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES

RELEVANT TO RESEARCH PERFORMANCE

,

Blair W. McDonald, Robert L. Ellisonand Lawrence R. James

I7Istitute for Behavioral Research in Creativity

Calvin W. TaylorUniversity of Utah

Reproduced byThe Creativity Research Institute

of

The Richardson Foundation, Inc.

No.'tember, 1967

A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF

ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES

RELEVANT TO RESEARCH PERFORMANCE

Blair W. McDonald, Robert L. Ellisonand Lawrence R. James

Institute for Behavioral Research in Creativity

Calvin W. TaylorUniversity of Utah

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE

OFFICE OF EDUCATION

THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE

PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT. POINTS OF VIEW OR PINIONS

STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION

POSITION OR POLICY.

Reproduced byThe Creativity Research Institute

of

The Richardson Foundation, Inc.

November, 1967

a

Introduction and Acknowledgements

The authors have herein attempted to assemble a series of articles

and books which have some bearing upon the study of industrial climate

as it effects research performance. We readily admit that the list of

sources may be incomplete. However, we have attempted to make it as

comprehensive as possible.

Wa wish to acknowledge the contributions of Robert T. Snarr,

Richard M. Minen, Shig Fujitani, and Lawrence James without whose

assistance this bibliography could not have been completed.

a

A SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES RELEVANTTO RESEARCH PERFORMANCE

Abrahamson, Mark. The integration of industrial scientists. Adminis-trative Science Quarterly, 1964, 9 (2), 208-218.

Administration of a government agency under conditions of rapid change.

Federal Government Accountant (September, 1962)

Afterq, C. D. & Honey, J. C. Attitudes of scientists and engineers about

their government employment, Vol.-T. SyracuseilreirrradThSchool of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University,

July, 1950.

Ahlberg, Clark D., & Honey, John C. Some administrative problems in

government research. Syracuse University, Washington Researchbffice, Washington, D. C., 1951.

Allen, Louis A. Us!ng new training methods to improve production. American

_tint. Assn. Manufacture Service, 1952, 203, 3-11.

American Management Association. The management of scientific manpower. AMA

Management Report No. 22 (New York: American Management Association,

1958).

Andrews, F. M. & Pelz, D. C. Dimensions of organizational atmosphere,Analysis Memo #7, 1961, SPC Publication #1825, ($517677,-Werldix H).

Andrews, F. M. Revised adjustmeni of performance measures to hold constant

some background faci.ors, Analysis Memo #21, 1966, SPC-P'ub-IIcation

MOO. Appendix G.

Andrews, F. M. Factors affecting the manifestation of creative ability by

scientists. Journal of Personality, 1965, Vol. 33, No. I, pp. 140-

152. (Chapter 9).

Andrews, Frank M. Scientific performance as related to time spent on

technical work, teaching, or administration. Administrative Science

Quarterly., 9 (2), 1964, 182-193.

Andrews, F. M. An exploration of scientists' motives, Analysis Memo #8,

1961, SRC 15ublicatIon #1825, (CriPTFFS-67-Tir"..

_

-2-

Anthony, R. A. Management control in industrial research organizations.

Cambridge: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard

University, 1952.

Argyris, C. Personality and organization. New York: Harper, 1957.

Balderston, J. A Performance and salary review system for scientists,

Research Management, VII, 1964, 209-224.

Barber, B., & Hirsch, W. (eds.), The Sociolo y of Science. The Free Press:

Glencoe, Illinois, 1962.

Barron, F. The needs for order and disorder as motives in creative activity,

in Taylor, C. W., & Barron, F. (eds.), Scientific creativity! Its

reco nition and development, John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1963.

hapter 12.

Bass, B. M., & Wurster, C. R, Effects of company rank on LGD performance

of oil refinery supervisors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953,

37, 100-104.

Baumgartel, Howard. Leadership, motivations and attitudes in research

laboratories. Journal of Social Issues, XII, 1956, 24-31.

Beebe, T. H. Company practices in rewarding outstanding research

achievements, Research Management, VIII, 1965, 311-330.

Bello, F. The world's greatest industrial laboratory. Fortune, Nov., 1958.

Bennis, W. G. A new role for the behavioral sciences: Effecting organizational

change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1963, 8 (2), 125-165.

Boehm, G. A. W. Research management - The new executive job, Fortune,

October, 1957.

Bowie, Robert M. The direction and control of research and development,

Research Man2222121, VI, 1963, 305-312.

Bowie, R. M. The role and qualifications of top-level research management,

Research Management, VII, 1964, 279-286.

Boyd, J. B. Interests of engineers related to turn-over, selection and

management. latrnalat_AsilieLl.L., 19610 45, 143-149.

Braunstein, Daniel N. The measurement of organizational behavior.

Dissertation Abstracts, 1964, 25 (2), 1317.

1.

41,

.3-

Brown, Charles W. Sources of variance in the response of supervisory to inter-

personal supervisory situations. Dissert. Abstracts, 1962, 23 (2)

689-690.

Brown, Paula & Shepard, C/ovis, Factionalism and organizational change in a

research laboratory. Social Problems III, 1956, 235-243.

Bush, G. P. BibHgrphy on research administration. Washington, D. C.:

University Press of WashIngton, b. 4.

Bush, G. P., & Hattery, L. H., eds. Scientific research: Its administration

and organizatjon. Adapted froiirfErFFEEMT75-FrIT771717-177FPFIn

on Administration of Scientific Research and Development. Washington:

American University Press, 1950.

Chapman, R. P. The role of research service in industrial research. Research

Management, VII, 1964, 27-34.

Chrichton, Anne. Managing professional people. Personnel Manapement, 1966,

48 (376), 78-82.

Clare, J. W. H. Current trends in the organization of industrial research.

Research Manadement, VI, 1963, 135-152.

Collier, Donald W., A "Civilian" looks at government-sponsored R&D, Research

Manapement, VI, 1963, 335-346.

Collinson, H. A. tiaLogiaement for research and development. Pitman and Sons,

Ltd.: London, 064.

Comrey, Andrew L., Pfiffner, John M. & Beem, Helen P. Factors influencing

organizational effectiveness. The Department of Employment Survey.

Personnel Psychology, 1953, 6, 65-79.

Cooley, William W., Predictin choice of a career in scientific research.

Paper presented an e nnua onven on of e merican sycho ogical

Association, Division 17, September 1, 1962, pp. 8-9.

Cottrell, A. H. Scientists: Solo or concerted. In Barber and Hirsch, Soci-

olmafice. New York: The Free Press, 1960.

Cox, Henry L. The personal approach in dealing with technical people. Research

Management, VI, 1963, 153-162.

Creativity and the Scientist. The direction of research establishments,

National Physical Labora ory, mer ajes y s a onery u t ce, ondon.

1957.

Cudd, Herschel H. The transition from scientist to general manager, ResearchManagement, VII, 1964, 371-380.

Davis, R. C. Commitment to professional values as related to 'the role per-

formance of research scientists. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation,University of Michigan, 1957.

Davis, R. D. Factors related to scientific research performance. Interpersonal

Factors in Research, Part I. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research,University of Michigan, 1954. Mimeographed.

Deutsch & Shea, Inc. Company climate and creativity. New York:, IndustrialRelations News,-1-0597---

Drevdahl, John E. Some developmental and eqvironmental factors in creativity.In Taylor, C. W. Widening horizons in creativit/. New York: John

Wiley & Sons, 1964, pp. 170-186.

Orucker, Peter F. Management and the professional employee. Harvard BusinPFbs

Review, Vol. 30 (1952), 84-90.

Drucker, Peter F. Twelve fables of research management. Harvard Business

Review, 1963, 41 (I), 103-108.

Dunteman, G. H. Organizational conditions and behavior in 234 industrial

manufacturing organizations. 12.22.212u221128.alEt22122., 1966, 50,

300-305.

Eiduson, Bernice T. Scientists:_ Their,psychological world. New York: Basic

Books, 1962.

Elder, James T. Basic research in Industry: Appraisal and forecast Research

tufammt, VI, 1963, 5-14.

Emery, David A. Managerial leadership through motivation by objectives.

Personnel psycholo9y, XII, 1959, 65-79.

Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. The causal texture of organizational environments.

Muman Relations, 1965, 18 (I), 21-32.

English, J. Morley, & Mclivaine, W. D. Faculty impressions of professional

climate in industry. Journal of Engineering Education, 1962, 520 249-251.

Evan, W. M. Conflict and performance in R&D organizations: Some prelininary

findings. Industrial Mana ement Review, 1965, Vol. 7, No.11, pp. 37-46.

(Chapters 80 I

Evans, J411. Factors related to the performance of scientists and engineers:

Synopses of research findings. Center for Research on Utilization of

Scientific Knowledge, Institute for Solial Research, University of

Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, (in press).

MEL

Farr, James N., Motivating an industry research group, Research Management, VI,

1963, 109-124,

Farris, G. F., Congruency of scientists' motives with their organizations'provisions for satisfying them: Its relationships to motivation,affective job experiences, style of work, and performance, Departmentof Psychology, University of Michigan, 1962. (Chapter 7).

Favorable and unfavorable working conaitiobs reported by scientists at two

research centers. Research conference on_the identification of creativescientific talent. -77717477797-nniversity of Utah'Press,

Fiedler, F. E., Leader attitudes and group effectiveness, University of Illinois

Press, UrrgT177775$67TrIFF7g7117774------

Fine, S. A., & Dickermann, R. A. Satisfaction and Productivity. American

......122Psellmist, 17, 1962, 353.

Foundation for Research on Human Behavior, Human factors in research adminis-tration, University of Michigan, Ann Arbd'r, 1,1drq,171-,17§77----

Franken, Peter. Research inhibitions. International Science and Techaaim

(May, 1963, D. 490

Friedlander, F. Criteria for research performance. American Psychologist,

18, 1963, 447.

Friedlander, F. Job characteristics as satisfiers and dissatisfiers. Journal

auzplad_filsnal2a, 48, 1964, 388-392.

Friedlander, F. Motivations to work and organizational performance. Journal

of Applied Psycholop, 50, 1966, 143-151.

Friedlander, F. Underlying sources of job satisfaction. 122E221.21122.LiaPsychology, 47, 1963, 246-250 (b).

Friedlander, F., & E. Walton. Positive and negative motivations toward

work. Administrative Science Quarterly, (in press).

Furnas, C. C., Ed. Research in industr Its organization and mana ement.

New York: Van Nostrand, I 4

Fusefeld, H. I. Effective government expenditure on long range industrialresearch. aazrsinasoment, VII, 1964, 107-128.

-6-

Gibson, R. E. A systems approach to research management, Part 3, The

operation and management of research and development organizations.

Research Management, VI, 1963, 15-28.

Gibb, Jack R. Communication and productivity. Personnvl Administration, 1964,

27, (I), 9-13, 45,

Given, W. B., The engineer goes into management. Harvard Business Review,

XXXII!, 1955, 43-52.

Glaser, Barney G. Attraction, autonomy and reciprocity in the scientist-

supervisor relationship. Administrative Science Ouarterly, VIII (Dec.---

1963), 379-398.

Gmitter, G. T., Towards a better understanding of industrial R&D and cost

control. Research Manasement, VIII, 1965, 229-240,

Gordon, G., & Marquis, Sue. Effect of differin administrative authorit on

scientific jnnovation, or mg aper , , rom projec oni,

OrganizaIronai tetting and Scientific Accomplishment, Graduate School

of Business, University of Chicago. (Chapter 2).

Griffin, J. Dennis. Experience with technicians in industrial research

laboratories. Management, VIII, 1965, 347-356.

Herbertt George R. The surroundings which research requires. Research

Management, VI, 1963, 401-410.

Hertz, D. B., & Rubenstein, A. H. Personnel practices and communications in

41 industrial research laboratories. Personnel, XXVII, 1951, 247-251.

Hertz, D. B. The theory and practice of industrial research. New York:

McGraw-H

Hinrichs, John R. Ths impact of industrial organization on the attitudes of

research chemists. Dissertation_Abetracts 1962, 23 (5)0 1772-1773.

Hirsch, I., MINitto Ws, & Oakes, O. Increasing the productivity of scientists.

Harvard Business Review, XXXV1, 1958, 66-76.

Hower, R. M., & Orth C. D., Ill. Mane ers and Scientists. Boston: Harvard

Univeristy Graduate School of us ness dm n s rat on, 1963.

Howton, William F. Work assignment and interpersonal relations In a research

organization. .22/q2a1=21221.2212222.1=12114, VII, 1963, 507-511.

.

4

-7-

Indik, Bernard P. Some effects of organization size on member attitudes and

behavior. Human Relations, 1963, 16 (4), 369-384.

Industrial Research Institute, Research is Peo le, Industrial Research

Institute, Inc., 1956.

Jenkins, D. J., Carleton, F. D., Peres, S. H., & Garcia, J. R. Studies in

managing research and development personnel. Research ManaientEL, VII.

1964, 349-365.

Jex, Frank B. Negative validities for two different ingenuity tests. Scientific

creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: John viTrw77.17----

Sons, 19t3, 299-561.

Kaplan, N. Some organizational factors affecting creativity. Institute of

Radio Engineers Transactions of the Professional Group arEn9ineering

management, 'Vol. EM-7, March 1960, 24-30.

Kaplan, N. The Role of the research administrator. Administrative Science

Ouarterly, IV, 1959, 20-42.

Kaplan, Norman. Organization: Will it choke or promote the growth of science,

in Karl Hill (ed.), The Management of scientists. Boston: Beacon Press,

Inc., 1964.

Kaplan, Norman. The Relation of creativity to sociological variables in

research organizations. Scientific creativity: Its recognition and

development. New York: John Wiley A Sons, 1963, 195-204.

Katzell, Raymond A. Contrasting systems of work organization. American

_ps/E121221,21, 1962, 17, 102-108.

Kidd, Charles V. Basic research descriptions vs. definition. Science, 1959,

CXXXIX, 376, 381.

Kidd, Charles V. Resolving promotion problems in a federal research

institution. Personnel Administration, 1952, XV, No. I.

King, Gilbert W. Problems of outlying research laboratories.Management, VI, 1963, 347-354.

Kipp, E. M. -Naive guides to effective human relations in R&D.

Management, VII, 1964, 419-436.

Koch, Edward G. Three approaches to organization. Harvard Business Review,

1961, 39 (2), 32-43, 160-162.

Korman, Abraham K. Selective perception among firstline supervisors.Personnel Administration, 1963, 26, (5), 31-36.

Research

Research

-8-

Kornhauser, William, & Hagstrom, Warren D. Fcientists in industr : Conflict

and accomodation. Los Angeles, Californ a: Univérsify of California

Press, 1962.

Knapp, Robert H. Demographic cultural and personality attributes of scientists.

Scientific creativit : Its reco nition and development. New York: John

Wiley & Sons, 19 3, 205-216.

Kornhauser, W. Scientists in industry. Berkeley: University of California

Press, 1962.

Krohn, Roger G. The institutional location of the scientist and 11;s scientific

values. IRE Transactions in EngineerJg Mana ement, VIII (Sept. 1961).

Kubie, Lawrence S. The fostering of creative scientific productivity.

Daedalus, XCI (Spring 1962), 304.

Kuhn, T. S. The essential tension: Tradition and innovation in scientific

research. In Taylor, C. W. & Barron, F. (eds.), Scientific creativity:

Its recognition and development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963,

(Chapter II).

Lamouria, Lloyd H., & Harrell, Thomas W. An approach to an objective criterion

for research managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1963, 47 (6)

353-357.

Lancaster, P. Handle with care - Scientists in industry often baffle the

bosses, force policy changes. Wall Street Journal, April 6, 1959.

pp. 1,8.

Likert, R. New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.

Livingston, R., & Milberg, S., (eds.), Human relations in industrial research

mumment. Including Papers frO771-he Sixt!- and lgventh Annual Confer-

ences on Industrial Research, Columbia University, 1955 and 1956. New

York: Columbia University Press, 1957.

Livingston, R. T., & Stanley, H. M. (eds.), Industrial Research Management.

New York: Columbia University Press, 1957.

McPherson, J. H. Prospects for future creativity research in industry. In

Taylor, C. W. Widening horizons in creativity. New York: John

Wiley & Sons, 11964, pp. 414-415,

MacNaughton, J. O. A study of foremen's communication. Personnel Practice

Bull, 1963, 19 (1), 10-17.

Mahoney, Thomas A., Jerdee, Thomas H., & Carroll, Stephen J. Development of

managerial performance: A research alproach. Cincinnati, Ohio:

South-Western, 1963. Monograph C-9.

10,

-9-

Mahoney, T. A., Sorenson, W. W., Jerdee, T. H., & Nash, A. N. Identification

and prediction of manageriAl effectiveness. Personnel Administration,

1963, 26, (4), 12-22.

Maier, N.R.F., & Hayes,,J. J. Creative maapement. New York: Wiley, 1962.

Maier, Norman R. F., A Hoffman, L. Richard. Organization and creative problem-

solving. Journal of Applied Psycholopy, 1961, 45, 277-280.

Mainzer, Lewis C. Scientific freedom in government-sponsored research.

Journal of Politics, XXIII (May, 1961), 230.

Maizill, R. E., Cronin, V., Haglind, J. B., & Lindwall, H. G. An index of

skills for research and development personnel. Research Management,

Vi, 1963, 209-222.

Marcson, Simon. Organization and authority in industrial research. Social

Forces, 1961, 40, 72-80.

Marcson, Simon. The scientist in american industr : Some organization

determinan s in manpower uti Ization. Nevi ork: Harper & Row, 1960:

1TrorrBIT"-=T'Tser,cienissiandWHian industry, conflict and

accomodation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962.

Marks, Melvin R. An objective criterion for research managers: A critique.

Journalof...±Eliediolo, 1965, 49 (2), 91-92.

Massey, Robert J., & Suojanen, Waino W. Molding organizational climate.

Advanc. M9mts 1961, 26 (10), 5-7.

Mees, & Leermakers, J. A. The or anization of industrial scientific

research. New York: McGraw41 I, 1950.

Meltzer, L., & Salter, M. Organizational structure and the performance and

job satisfaction of physiologists. American Sociolo9ical Review, 1962,

27 (3), 351-362.

Meltzer, L. Scientific productivity in organizational settings. Journal of

Social Issues XXII, 1956, 32-40.

Miller, D. B. Professional growth a shared responsibility. Research Manage-

ment, VII, 1964, 407-418.

Moore and Renck, The professional employee in industry. Journal of Business,

Jan. 1955, 58.

National Society of Professional Engineers. How to Improve En91neering-Management_.Communications. Prepared under the direction of the Pro-fessional Engineers Conference Board for Industry. Executive ResearchSurvey No. I. Washington: National Society of Professional Engineers,

1952.

Paine, Frank T., Carroll, Stephen, J., Jr., & Lette, Burt A. Need satisfactionsof managerial level personnel in a government agency. Journal of AppliedPsycholop, 1966, 50(3), 247-249.

Parnes, S. J. (ed), BibliThe Creative ducaBuffalo, 1964.

ra h on the nature and nurture of creative behavior.oun ation,bae In versiyo New or at

Patchem, M. Supervisory methods and group performance norms. Admin. ScienceQuarterly, 1962, 7(3), 275-294.

Patchen, M. The choice of wa9e comparisons. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,New Jersey, 1961.

Patchen, M. A conceptual framework and some empirical data regarding com-parisons of social rewards. Sociometry, 1961, vol. 24, pp 136-156.

Pease, Hugh M. Raising productivity in problem solving operations. PersonnelAdministration, 1964, 27(1), 39-42.

Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, Frank M. Autonomy, coordination and stimulation,in relation to scientific achievement. Behavioral Science, 1966,II (2), 89-97.

Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. Scientists in organizations. New York: JohnWiley & Sons, Inc., 19667-

Pelz, D. C. Freedom in research, Science and Technology, (Feb. 1964), 54-66.

Pelz, D. C. Influence: A key to effective leadership in the first-linesupervisor. Personnel, XXIX, 1952, 209-217.

Pelz, D. C. Interaction and attitudes between sceintists and auxiliarystaff: I Viewpoint of Staff, II Viewpoint of Scientists, Admin-istrative Science Quarterly, IV (Dec. 1959 and March 1960), 321=33e,4;0-425.

Pelz, D. C. Motivation of the engineering and research specialists. GeneralManagement Series, No. 186, (New York: American Management Assoc., nc.)

I.

Pelz, D. C. Relationships between mnasures of scientific performance and other

variables. Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development.

New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1963, 302-310.

Pelz, D. C. Social factors in the motivation of engineers and scientists,

School science and mathematics, June 1958, 428.

Pelz, D. C. Some social factors related to performance in a research

organization. In Barber and Hirsch (eds.) Sociology.,of science. New

York: The Free Press, 1960.

Peres, S. H. An exploration of engineer's and scientist's motives related

to job performance. American Psychologist, 18, 1963, H14,

Peter, Hollis W. Human factors in research administration. In Rensis Likert

and Samuel P. Hayes, Jr. (eds.) Some applications of behavioral

research.. New York: UNESCO, 1957.

Phelps, Ernest D. Help your engineers to get ahead. Harvard Business Review,

1962, 40(1), 125-132.

Pierce, J. R. Freedom in research. Science, CXXX (Sept. 1959), 540-542.

Randle, C. Wilson. Problems of R&D management. Harvard Business Review,

1959, 128-136, p. 136.

Reeves, E. Duer. Measuring research effectiveness, making effective use of

research and development. American Management Association, General

Management Series, No. 180, New York, 1956.

Reif, Fred. The Competitive world of the pure scientist. Science, CXXXIV

(1961), 1957, 1962.

Research is People. A collection of papers discussing the recruitment,

motivation, recognition, rating and evaluation of research personnel.

Reviews of data on research & development. National Science Foundation Report

NSF 62-9 (Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1962),

p. 8.

Reynolds, Wm., B. Research evaluation Research Management, VIII, 1965,

117-120.

Ritti, Raymond R. Engineers and managers: A study of engineering organization.

Dissertation Abstracts, 1961, 21 (12), 3845.

-12-

Rubenstein, A. H. A Directory of Research on Research. College on Researchand Development of the Institute of Management Sciences, NorthwesternUniversity, Evanston, Illinois, May, 1964.

Rushing, William A. Organizational rules and surveillance: Propositions In

comparative organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly,1966, 10 (4), 423-443.

Saunders, David R. Some measures related to success and placement in basicengineering research and development. Scientific creativity: Its

recognition and development, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1963.

Schumacher, Joseph C. Salary administration of scientific and engineeringpersonnel in an atmosphere of increasing competition. ResearchManagement, VI, 1963, 355-366.

Scientific mind and the management mina The. Opinion Research Corporation,Princeton, N. J. Sept. 1959.

Shepard, Clovis. Orientations of scientists and engineers. pacifig Sociologi-cal Review, IV (Fall 1961).

Shepard, H. A. Patterns of organi7ation for applied research and development.Journal of Business, XXIX, 1956, 52-58.

Shepard, H. A. Some studies in laboratory management. Armed Forces Manage-

ment 1955, 2-3.

Shepard, H. A. Superiors and subordinates in research, Journal of Business,XXIX, 1956, 261-267.

Shepard, H. A. The dual hierarchy in research. Research Management, I, 1958.

Shepherd, C., & Brown, P. Status, prestige and esteem in a research organization.Administrative Science Quarterly, I, 1956, 340-360.

Sherwin, Chalmers W. The new responsibilities of the scientific communitywithin government. Research Management VIII, 1965, 95-104.

Silkiner, Davis S. A Method to translate organizational effectiveness intooperational data and a test of its practicality. Dissertation Abstracts,1965, 26 (I), 484.

Simon, Herbert A. On the concept of organizational goal. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 1964, 9 (I), 1-22.

00

-13-

Smith, Alfred G. Communication and status: The d namics of a research center.

Eugene, Oregon: U. Oregon,

Smith, Bernard. Handbooks for new employees. Personnel Management, 1962, 44,

101-107.

Smith, Clagett G., & Tannerbaum, Arnold S. Organizational control structure:

A comparative analysis. Human Rela.tions, 1963, 16, 299-316.

Speroff, B. J. Experimental procedures and techniques for evaluating super-

visory performance. Personnel Administration, 1961, 24 (3), 4-10.

Splurge of Research is piling up new problems for management. Business Week,

Jan 4, 1958. pp. 46-50.

Staff report, continued development of technical personnel - Prevention of

obsolescence. Research Management, VIII, 1965, 159-168.

Starry, Allan R. Life history antecedents of success among research and develop-

ment engineers. Dissert. Abstracts 1963, 23 (7), 2587-2588.

Steele, L. Personnel practices in industrial laboratories. Personnel, XXIX,

1953, 469-476.

Stein, Morris I. A transactional approach to creativity. Scientific creativity:

Its reco nition and development. New York: John Wire"7-3-nd Sons, 1963,

Stewart, Naomi, & Sparks, William J. Patent productivity of research chemists

as related to age and experience. Personnel and Guidance Journal 1966,

45, (1), 28-36.

Stolz, R. K. Planning - Key to research success. Harvard Business Review, XXXV,

1957, 82-88.

Stratton, J. A. Science and the process of management. Research Management,

VII, 1964, 79-90.

Tannerbaum, Robert J., Weschler, Irving R., & Massarik Fred. Leadership and

organization: A behavioral science approach, New York: McGraw-Hill,

1961.

Tassel, K. Vn. Managing research and development. ...Rese.arch_janaenent, VIII,

1965, 139-144.

-14-

Taylor, C. W. (ed.). Creativity: Progress and potential. New York: McGraw-

Hill, 1964.

Taylor, C. W. (ed). Widening horizons in creativity. New York: John Wiley

& Sons, 1964.

Taylor, C. W. (ed.). Instructional media and creativity. New York: John

Wiley & Sons, 1966.

Taylor, C. W. Climate for creativity. Rekort on seventh national creativityconference, in print.

Taylor, C. W., and Barron, F. (eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition

and development. New York: John W ey ons, 1

Taylor, C. W., & Ellison, R. L. Biographical predictors of scientificperformance. Science, 155, (3766), March 3, 1967, pp. 1075-1080.

Taylor, C. W. Environment and creativity. In G. Nielson (ed.), Proceedingsof the XIV International Congress of Applied Psychology, Vol. XIV.,Industrial and business psychology (see: 37:4120).

Thistlethwaite. Donald L. Tne college environment as a determinant of

research potentiality. Scientific creativity: Its reco nition and

development. New York: ohn ey ons,

Thurstone, L. L. Criteria of scientific success and the selection ofscientific talent. Widening_horizons in creativity. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1964, 16-76.

Torpev, W. G. The professional employee replies to management. Personnel

Administration, XVII, 1954, 19-26.

Toynbee, Arnold. Is america neglecting her creative minority? Widenin

horizons in creativity. New York: John Wiley & Sons, I

U. S. National Science Foundation, Division of Scientific Personnel andEducation. Trends in the employment and training of sceintists andengineers. WashIngton: Government 15r-int-kg Once, 1056.

U. S. President's Committee on Engineers and Scientists for Federal Govern-ment Programs. Summary report of surve of attitudes of scientists

and enqineers.in government and industry. Washington: overnment

Printing Office, 1957.

Vacca, Louis N. Administrationoof the applied research function. Research

Management, VIII, 1965, pp. 5-26.

11,

-15-

Walton, Eugene. A study of organizational communication systems. PersonnelAdministration, 1963, 26 (3), 46-49.

Wells, P. A. Recent developments in the classification of scientists in thefederal service. Research Management, VI, 1963, 73-80.

White, H. C. A case study of RAZ as a pattern in i.ndustria1 management.Chicago: University of Chicago, Jan., 1960. Mimeographed.

Wolfe, Earle W. Staff evaluations: A key to more effective performance.Journal of Rehabilitation. 1960, 26 (4), 19-22, 37-38.

Woodworth, Donald G. Job satisfaction and personality: A study of researchscientists. Dissertation Abstracts, 1964, 25 (3), 2038-2039.

Wiesner, Jerome B. Federal research and development: Policies and prospects.American Psychologist. 1964, 19 (2), 90-101.

Addendum to a Selected Bibliography ofOrganizational Climate StudiesRelevant to Research Performance

1Taylor, Calvin cAV, Smith William IZ,J (hiolin; Brewster. Factors

which scientists in one nmsearch can',er consider hindrances to

their_s2)21Lahinl, Univeniity of Utah, 1960. 4)Aimeographed)

2Johnson, Le Roy, & Taylor, Calvin W. 411._!an1191_24LJ:11-111.2.21

of .7.ientislts" lobs at one cLovernmcqt laboratory._ University of

Utah; 1960. iviimeographd

3Smith, W. R. Favorable and unfavorable working conditions reported

by scientists at two research :i.enter-1.. In the third (1959)

University of Utah research conference on the identification

of creative scientific talent, 2, W. Taylor, 1959; pp. 250-267.

4Tayle.", Calvin W, Smih, William R & Ghiselino Brewster Product-

ivity and Creativity of Sc:sts at an Air Force research

center, Tn Glenn Finch (Ed.), Personnel and training; research

symposium on Air Force humpm engineering (Publ., 783)

National Academy of ScLence, National Research Council, 1960.

Pp. 133-143.

5Taylor, C. W. Search for a creative climate, Spech delivered at

Seventeenth National :11onference on the Adminit.Lai.in of Research,

Estes Park Colorado, September 11-130 1963.

6Taylor, C. W.. W, H. Githens, W. Blumenfeld, I. E, Kaplan A study

of the work environment in a elcientific laboratory, Report No.

USNRDL MR-24 U. S. Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory, San

Francisco, 24 November 1965. ;Aultilithed)

7Taylor, C, W. Can organizations be creative, too? Chanter in

forthcoming book on Climate for Creativity.. Conference held

at Greensboro, North Carolina, March 23-26, 1966,

8Taylor, C, W, Climate for Creativity.. Conference held at Greensboro,

North Carolina, March 23-26, 1966, Forthcoming 1968 book.

9Taylor, C W. Leadership for Creatlye Or aniza_ional Functioning.

Speech delivered at Hotcl Utah Salt Lake City, Utah on August

25, 1967 for a leadership conference of the National Science

Teachers Association of the Na4-:ional Education Association.

(Mimeographed)