part 7 repelling the enmity of al-barmakee the disgraceful one part 2

A Series of Refutations in Annihilating the Accusations of Those that Claim ash-Shaykh Yahya has Opposed the Salaf in the Usool!

Series Part 7: Is Shaykh Yahya the only one who sees the second adhaan to be an innovation

Repelling the Enmity of al-

Barmakee the Disgraceful One

Part 2

Sure Evidences that the First

Adhaan is from the Issues of

Ijtihaad

Written by:

Abul-Abbaas Yaasir Bin Mahmood Al-Jayjalee

Translated by: Abul-Layth Yusuf Al-Biritaanee



The statement of one of the four caliphs does not take precedence over the statement of other than them regarding the most authentic of the two narrations.

[Al-Musawwadah page 305]

Al-Imaam Al-Waade'ee said:

Not every person of innovation is an innovator, for 'Uthmaan, may Allah be pleased with him, ordered with the first Adhaan of Az-Zawraa'

1, and if Abdullah Bin 'Umar entered a Masjid that the first Adhaan was

being called in he would abandoned it and say: Verily it is a Masjid of innovation. Nevertheless, he did not say that 'Uthmaan is an innovator, rather 'Uthmaan made Ijtihaad, so whoever comes after 'Uthmaan,

and the proof becomes apparent and he (still) blindly follows 'Uthmaan upon this (i.e. the first Adhaan),

then he is to be regarded as an innovator because: blind following in itself is an innovation.

[Ghaaratul-Ashritah 2/99]

Al-Barmakee the Haddaadee2 said: For the people of knowledge have all together without any exception

agreed upon the Adhaan of 'Uthmaan- may Allah be pleased with him- being a Sunnah end of his speech.

Al-Imaam Al-Waade'ee said: Then it is acknowledged from this that the first Adhaan is not a Sunnah. end of his statement

[Answering the Questioner, page 333]

Al-Barmakee said: Then there is no need for the understanding of Ibn Hazm the Dhaahiree3 and (for) the understanding of Yahya Al-Hajooree. end of his speech

Al-Imaam Al-Waade'ee said:

1 Az-Zawraa' was a market place in the city of Madinah.

2 A clarification of the Haddaaddee sect can be found here- http://aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?p=27741

3 The Zhaahiriyyah methodology that Shaykh Bin Baaz- may Allah have mercy upon him- referred to as "the taking of that

which is apparent of the texts and the absence of contemplation regarding the explanation and the analogy. For there is no

analogy according to them, and neither any explanation, rather they assert the apparent of the commands and prohibitions, and

they do not contemplate upon the underlying reasons and meanings, so they were named the Zhaahiriyyah due to this notion"

return to the fatwa of the Shaykh- http://www.ibnbaz.org.sa/mat/276.



And as for the Hadeeth 'Upon you is my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly guided caliphs, hold onto it with your molar teeth' then the best of those who have spoken concerning it, according to what I have come

across is: Abu Muhammad 'Alee Bin Ahmad Bin Sa'eed, may Allah The Most High have mercy upon him,

widely known as Ibn Hazm.

[Answering The Questioner, page 333]

The transgressing Haddaadeeyyah have not stopped, (they are) continuing to attack the 'Ulamaa of the

Ummah and its leaders, and are over-emphasising issues of permitted differing, and are building upon it

harsh rulings from censure, hindering, rebuking and the labelling of innovation, they are not those that take

the statements and their guidelines into consideration. This Al-Barmakee has manifested a proof upon this, due to what he has made evident from ignorance, delirium, oppression and slander (that he wrote) on

the two websites: 'Wahlain' and 'Al-Asharee'.1

Then he accuses 'The Sincere Advisor' 2 (i.e. ash-Shaykh Yahya) with a false accusation oppressively and

aggressively, and that does not increase 'The Sincere Advisor' except in high rank and it does not increase

the Haddaadiyyah except in lowliness and ruin. I have already clarified the misguidance of this 'being' in

what has proceeded with the praise of Allah- concerning the refutations upon him, you will find them gathered together among: 'The Salafi Clarifications Of The Deceptions Of Al-Barmakeyyah' on

Aloloom.net.

And this has already been made clear- with the praise of Allah- in the first part (i.e. of this series, this being

part 2) the falsehood that Al-Barmakee has accused 'The Sincere Advisor' of slandering the Ameerul-

Mu'mineen, 'Uthmaan Bin 'Affaan the martyr, may Allah be pleased with him and make him pleased with

Him, just as it has also been clarified- and the blessing belong to Allah alone- that the reality of this Al-

Barmakee is that he is Haddaadee, eating into Ahlus-Sunnah in the name of the Sunnah, and from the

proofs upon that is:

- His statement that the saying may Allah have mercy upon him upon the people of innovation is an atrocious crime. This is the statement of the Haddaadiyyah, as for Ahlus-Sunnah then they believe in the

permissibility of saying may Allah have mercy upon him to the Muslim, whether he is a Salafi or an innovator. Return to the book: The Unsheathed Sword upon al-Barmakee, the Abandoned one which is distributed on Aloloom.net.

- His rejection of quoting from the people of innovation concerning that which they were proficient in from

the different fields of knowledge, just as his rejection of quoting from Ibn Al-Haaj on the pretext that he is

a grave worshipper, and likewise Sayyid Saabiq and Al-Haytamee and other than them, and I have already

mentioned something from the speech of the 'Ulamaa and their quoting from them in: The Unsheathed Sword upon Al-Barmakee, the Abandoned one and in the first part of Repelling the Enmity of al-Barmakee, the Disgraceful one.

1 The websites are called Al-Wahyain (the two revelations) and is refered to as Al-Wahlain (the two pieces of dirt) due to the dirt

that appears on that website, and Al-Atharee (an attribution to narrations) is refered to as Al-Asharee (an attribution to

insolence). 2 A characteristic that Shaykh Muqbil described Shaykh Yahya as being.



-His declaring of ash-Shaykh Yahya as an innovator without any proof and without having any of the

'Ulamaa precede him. Return back to the book: The Falsification of the Allegations of al-Barmakee- concerning Al-Mujmal (the ambiguous) and Al-Mufassal (the detailed).

Today Al-Barmakee has manifested extreme Haddaadiyyah more severe than the first (i.e. the

Haddaadiyyah that came before him), for he labels (others) as innovators due to issues of permitted

differing. And the Baraamikah have already announced on (Wahlain) in their comments upon the speech of

their 'big Barmakee'; the declaring of ash-Shaykh Yahya being an innovator, may Allah preserve him. For

All praise is for Allah, He who made apparent that what is in their hearts and made evident to the people

their Haddadiyyah and their deviation.

Al-Barmakee Al-Haddaadee said:

And look at the statement of Al-Hajooree in 'The Rulings Of Jum'ah' page 315:

As for who followed him- meaning 'Uthmaan- upon that mistake after the evidence is clarified, then he is

in regards to that an innovator, there is no excuse for him in opposing the Sunnah of the messenger and

his companions.

I say- i.e. Al-Barmakee- Then I swear by Allah this speech is not tolerated by the people of knowledge and

Tawheed, for within it is the labelling of someone as being an innovator and an ignoramus and (within it is)

debasement and accusing them with terrible things. Likewise this is a ruling upon the 'Ulamaa of the

Ummah, all of them together with no exceptions, that they are innovators because, according to Al-

Hajooree, there is no excuse for them in opposing the Sunnah of the messenger and his companions!!

And All praise is for Allah, 'Uthmaan- may Allah be pleased with him- is safe from this declaration of

being an innovator! And it is no surprise that this declaration of innovation emanated from a man who

committed a crime before and accused (some of) the companions as having 'Irjaa!} End of his statement.

I say (i.e. Yaasir Al-Jayjalee): Look Oh Doctor1 to the statement of Al-Imaam Muqbil Al-Waade'ee - may

Allah have mercy upon him- :

Not every person of innovations is an innovator, for 'Uthmaan, may Allah be pleased with him, ordered with the first Adhaan of az-Zawraa', and if Abdullah Bin 'Umar entered a Masjid that the first Adhaan was

being called in then he would abandon it and say: Verily it is a Masjid of innovation. Nevertheless, he did not say that 'Uthmaan is an innovator, rather 'Uthmaan made Ijtihaad, and whoever comes after 'Uthmaan,

if the proof becomes apparent and he (still) blindly follows 'Uthmaan upon this (i.e. the first Adhaan), then

he is to be regarded as an innovator because: blind following in itself is an innovation.


So all of these atrocious words and abominable characteristics which Al-Barmakee al-Haddaadee let burst

fourth, then the first person that it falls on is the sea (i.e. of knowledge) al-Imaam al-Mujaddid al-

Waade'ee- may Allah have mercy upon him- I say to you here as I said to you in part one: and this alone is sufficient in breaking the backs of the Baraamikah and in annihilating their evil, and obliterating their

havoc, however: it is for he who has a heart.

1 Refering to 'Doctor' Al-Barmakee.



As for his statement and he has accused (some of) the companions of having 'Irjaa

Then I say: By Allah (It is) a great lie, and an immense accusation, for the Shaykh- may Allah preserve

him- does not slander anyone from the companions of the messenger of Allah , rather his speech comes

in the course of the history of the innovation of 'Irjaa. For he mentioned that it is the first (thing) what

entered upon the companions who misinterpreted (the texts) regarding drinking alcohol, then they repented

to Allah, Mighty and Exalted be He, due to what had become clear to them from the truth, may Allah be

pleased with them.

And that which is well known is that those companions- may Allah be pleased with them- when they

deemed alcohol to be permissible, they only deemed it to be permissible as ones that misinterpreted the

statement of Allah The Most High:

Those who believe and do righteous good deeds, there is no sin on them for what they ate, if they fear

Allah, and believe and do righteous good deeds, and again fear Allah and believe, and once again fear

Allah and do good deeds with Ihsan (perfection). And Allah loves the good-doers (Al-Maa'idah 93)

Because if they were not considered to have misinterpreted (the verse) then they would have disbelieved-

due to Istihlaal (deeming something permissible that is impermissible), may they be free from this and may

Allah have mercy upon them.

It is well known that erroneous interpretation of the speech of Allah Mighty and Exalted be He, does not

happen except by way of a doubt, and it is preposterous that an erroneous interpretation was not (caused

by) a doubt. So if we contemplate upon this doubt which these companions misinterpreted- may Allah be

pleased with them- we find it to be the very same doubt that entered upon the Murji'ah, however due to the

companions of Allah's messenger being cultivated with an upright cultivation under the supervision of

the best of mankind, it led them to return from their mistake because of what 'Umar Bin Al-Khattaab

informed them- may Allah be pleased with him- and other than him from those who were more

knowledgeable than them. As for the misguided Murji'ah then they hold tight onto this doubt until it led

them to statements that are the utmost degree of falsehood.

Thus it is not permissible for anybody to accuse ash-Shaykh Yahya with slandering the noble companions,

rather he loves them and he says: may Allah be pleased with them upon all of them, and he traverses upon their method.

Ibn Abil-'Izz said in (Sharh ut-Tahaweyyah) page 259 Dar ul-Imaam Maalik print:

And the Shaykh (i.e. At-Tahaawee) - may Allah have mercy upon him- intended by his speech: We do not say that when a person has Eeman then it will not be harmed by any sin which he commits, to oppose the Murji'ah, their doubt had entered upon some of the first generation, so the companions agreed upon killing

them if they did not repent. For Qadaamah Bin Abdullah and a group of people drank alcohol after its

prohibition, misinterpreting Allah the Most Highs statement:



Those who believe and do righteous good deeds, there is no sin on them for what they ate, if they fear

Allah, and believe and do righteous good deeds, and again fear Allah and believe, and once again fear

Allah and do good deeds with Ihsan (perfection). And Allah loves the good-doers (Al-Maa'idah 93)

end of his (i.e. Ibn Abul-'Izz) statement.

The Haddaadee (i.e. Al-Barmakee) said: and now for you oh dear reader I present to you what the people of knowledge convey from the consensus of Ahlus-Sunnah all together, except the Rawaafidh1,

concerning the Adhaan of 'Uthmaan- may Allah be pleased with him, being a Sunnah.

I say: Not every consensus which is conveyed is considered a correct consensus, regarded considerable and

that which is not permissible to oppose. For how many consensuses have been conveyed and in (those

particular) issues there is well known differing? From that which urged the Ulamaa to criticise and follow up these consensuses, concerning that Shaykh Al-Islaam wrote his great book: Criticism of the book 'The Levels of Consensus' and he clarified within it the mistakes of Ibn Hazm concerning his book: The Levels of Consensus, and he, who is he regarding Fiqh and Hadeeth?!! (i.e. Ibn Hazm, how great he was in these issues)

Despite this, the claim of consensus in issues that were differed still occurred, Imaam Ahmad said in his

famous words: Whoever claims consensus has lied!! What will make him know that perhaps they may have differed? So whatever issue has affirmed within it more than (one) statement of the people of knowledge, then there is no consensus regarding it no matter who conveyed it.

Al-Imaam Al-Albaanee- may Allah have mercy upon him- said:

and that is because of two affairs: The First: That it is not possible to establish the Ijmaa (consensus) in its Usoolee2 meaning in other than issues that are known in the religion by way of necessity, as has been implemented by the strong 'Ulamaa, such as Ibn Hazm in (Usool al-Ahkaam), ash-Shawkaanee in (Irshaad

al-Fahool), the Ustaadh Abdul-Wahhaab Khilaaf in his book (Usool ul-Fiqh) and other than them. Imaam

Ahmad has likewise indicated this in his famous words in the refutation upon one who claimed Ijmaa (consensus) and it was narrated by his son Abdullah Bin Ahmad in: Al-Masaail.

The Second: I have examined many of the issues which they have conveyed an Ijmaa (consensus) in, and I have found well known differing within them! Rather I have found that the methodology of the Jamhoor

(majority) was in opposition to what the Ijmaa (consensus) was claimed therein, and had I wished to present examples upon this then it would prolong the speech and it would take us (away) from what we are

discussing.

So it suffices us now that we mention one example, an-Nawawee conveyed an Ijmaa (consensus) of it not being disliked for the funeral prayer (to be preformed) in the times that prayers are disliked (i.e. between

'Asr and Maghrib, Fajr and sun rise etc.)! Although the differing in this is old and well known, and most of

the people of knowledge are upon differing with the presumed consensus. end of his statement from [The Rulings Of The Funeral Prayer] page 173.

1 Extreme Shee'a.

2 Usool, i.e. Usool ul-Fiqh- A science from the sciences of the religion.



I (Yaasir) Say: So this consensus that was conveyed by Imaam an-Nawawee, the author of al-Majmoo'; which is considered one of the greatest books which is returned back to in Fiqh, likewise the author of al-Minhaaj; which is considered to be the best explanation of (Saheeh Muslim) as Imaam Al-Albaanee said in his tape: Who is Considered to be a Disbeliever and who is Considered to be an Innovator. Nevertheless, his conveying of consensus is not accepted if it is affirmed that there is differing within (that

particular) issue.

Imaam al-Albaanee said:

It is not possible to affirm the validity of Ijmaa (consensus) in this issue, even though al-Bayhaqee had narrated it (i.e. an Ijmaa) in his (Sunnan) 4/124 and other than him like Al-Haafidh Ibn Hajr in (Al-Fath), however it is as if he indicated towards it not being affirmed when he said (10/260) concerning the research

about gold rings: for consensus has been conveyed about it being permissibility for women and that which nullifies this consensus will come soon inshallah, and that is because nobody can claim that it is a

consensus that is known within the religion by way of necessity and other than this consensus, from that

which its concept is not possible (to comprehend) let alone its occurrence. And with that Imaam Ahmad-

may Allah have mercy upon him- said:

Whoever claims al-Ijmaa (consensus) then he has lied [for what will make him come to know?] that perhaps the people may have differed

[related by his son Abdullah in Masaailih page 390].

[The etiquettes of Marriage page 166]

I (Yaasir) say: This is Imaam Al-Bayhaqee, the leader of Ahlus-Sunnah in his time, and that is al-Haafidh

Ibn Hajr author of (Fathul-Baaree) the best explanation of (Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree) just as Imaam Al-

Albaanee said in his tape (Who Is The Disbeliever And Who Is The Innovator), despite that their

conveyance of consensus was rejected due to the affirmation of differing in the issue.

Imaam Al-Albaanee said:

Then these narrations are authentic from the companions, they prove that doing five or six 'Takbiraat'1

continued after the prophet in opposition to who claimed consensus upon it being only four. This

statement has been investigated concerning the falsehood of this claim by Ibn Hazm in (Al-Muhalla) 5-

124/125.

end of his speech from [The Rulings Of The Funeral Prayer page 114]

And he (i.e. Imaam Al-Albaanee) said (page 174):

And from what has preceded notifies the falsehood of the consensus which has been mentioned by Ibn Qadaamah in (Al-Mughnee, 2/569) concerning the deceased one attaining reward for recitation that is done

for him, and how can this not be false? And from the foremost of those to oppose this is Imaam ash-

Shaafe'ee, may Allah The Most High have mercy upon him.

And this is another example of where consensus was claimed within which is not correct, and a notification

upon this has already proceeded not too long ago. end of his speech

1The saying of 'Allahu Akbar'.



I (Yaasir) say: Then if Ibn Qadaamah, an-Nawawee, Ibn Hajr and al-Bayhaqee had their conveyance of

consensus rejected when differing was affirmed, then how can al-Barmakee al-Haddaadee's conveyance of

consensus not be rejected concerning an issue in which the revered 'Ulamaa differed, and from the head of

them is the great companion Abdullah Bin 'Umar and his student Naaf'i. And from the contemporaries of

the present time Al-Imaam Al-Mujaddid Muqbil Al-Waade'ee and his student Shaykh Yahya Al-Hajooree?

This is because Consensus is (defined as): The agreement of the Mujtahid's of this Ummah after the

prophet upon a legislative ruling. This is the definition of al-Imaam Ibn 'Uthaymeen, as he said after that: So excluded by our statement 'The agreement' is the presence of differing, even if it was from one person, then we do not form consensus with this (issue). end of his statement

[Al-Usool min Ilm Al-Usool].

So it is known that every issue that has within it occurrence of differing concerning it, then it is not safe for

the one who claims consensus in it. Rather it is from the issues of Ijtihaad which differing in regards to it is

permitted, even if the four caliphs agreed upon it, let alone if it was Ijtihaad of one of them, may Allah be

pleased with them.

Imaam Ash-Shawkaanee said:

The majority also hold the view that the consensus of the four caliphs is not a proof, because they are (only) part of the Ummah. It has been narrated from Ahmad that it is a proof, and also some of the people

of knowledge were upon the opinion that it is a proof due to what has been narrated from what contains this

meaning, like his statement : Upon you is my Sunnah, and the Sunnah of the rightly guided caliphs and his statement: Follow those after me, Abu Bakr and 'Umar and these two Hadeeths are authentic, and that which is similar to them. I answer: that these two Hadeeths are proof that they are people who are

deserving of being followed, not that their statement is a proof against other than them.

[Irshaad al-Fahool page 177]

If you have perceived this, then know that there is from the 'Ulamaa he who does not see the first Adhaan

of the Friday prayer to be Sunnah.

Al-Haafidh Ibn Rajab, may Allah have mercy upon him said:

A'taa disapproved of the first Adhaan, and he said: it was only something added by al-Hajjaaj, he said: 'Uthmaan only used to call the people with it.

This was extracted by Abdur-Razzaaq.

'Amr Bin Deenaar said: Rather it is only 'Uthmaan that added the Adhaan in Madinah, and as for Makkah then the first person to add it was al-Hajjaaj.

He said: And I saw Ibn az-Zubayr, no Adhaan was called for him until he sat at the pulpit, and on the Friday only one Adhaan was called for him.

This was likewise extracted by Abdur-Razzaaq.



And it was narrated by Mus'ib Bin Salaam, From Hishaam Bin Al-Ghaaz, From Naaf'i, from Ibn 'Umar that

he said:

Rather when the messenger of Allah , sat upon the pulpit, (it is then that) Bilaal called the Adhaan. And

when the prophet concluded the sermon he would perform the prayer, and the first Adhaan is an

innovation.

And it has been narrated by Wakee' in his book, from Hishaam Bin Al-Ghaaz that he said:

I asked Naaf'i about the Adhaan on Friday? So he said: Ibn 'Umar said: It is an innovation, and every innovation is misguidance, even if the people perceive it to be something good.

Abdur-Rahmaan Bin Zayd Bin Aslam said:

There was only two Adhaans in the time of the prophet , a Adhaan when he sat upon the pulpit, and a

Adhaan when the prayer commenced. He said: And this last one was something newly invented by the

people after him.

This was gathered by Ibn Abee Haatim

Sufyaan Ath-Thawree said:

There is no Adhaan for Friday until the sun starts to descend from the mid-point of the sky, and when the Muadhin calls the Adhaan then the Imaam stands and begins his sermon, and when he descends then he

commences the prayer. He said: and the Adhaan which was in the time of the messenger of Allah and

Abu Bakr and 'Umar was one Adhaan and an Iqaamah, and this (first) Adhaan which has been added is

a newly invented matter.

Ash-Shaafe'ee said- in regards to what was related by Ibn Abdul-Barr:

It is more beloved to me that the Adhaan on Friday is when the Imaam sits upon the pulpit before him (i.e. in view of the Muadhin). So when he sits then the Muadhin begins the Adhaan, then when he finishes he

(i.e. the Imaam) stands and begins his sermon. He said: And A'taa disapproved that 'Uthmaan brought about

the newly invented second Adhaan and said: It is nothing but something that Mu'awwiyah had brought

about.

Ash-Shaafe'ee said:

Whichever of the two it is, then the Adhaan that was in the time of the prophet and it is the one that when it occurs then the people were prohibited from selling (in the market places)...... up until he said Al-Qaadhee Abu Ya'laa said: That which is recommended is that only one Adhaan is called, and that is after the sitting of the Imaam upon the pulpit, and if it was called after the midday and before the sitting of

the Imaam upon the pulpit then it is permissible, and not disliked, then he mentioned this Hadeeth of As-Saaib Bin Yazeed.



Harb quoted from Ishaaq Bin Raahawiyyah:

That the first Adhaan for Friday is a newly invented matter, 'Uthmaan carried it out, he saw that it (i.e. the

call to prayer) would not be heard except if he increased it to two Adhaans, in order for those far away to

perceive it, and it became a Sunnah, because upon the caliphs is the consideration of the people regarding

these affairs, and what is understood from this it that this returns back to the choice of the leader, and if he

needs it due to the great amount of people then he may do it, and if this is not the case, then there is no

need for it.

[Fath Al-Baaree 5th

Volume 451/454]

Al-Imaam Al-Waade'ee was asked 'is the first Adhaan of Friday an innovation'?

Then he answered:

Al-Bukhaaree narrated in his Saheeh from the Hadeeth of As-Saaib Bin Yazeed, may Allah be pleased with

him, that the prophet had a Muadhin that would call one Adhaan or something with this meaning: Al-

Bukhaaree mentioned it in the chapter of Al-Jummah, that when the people grew large in number, and this

is from the Hadeeth of As-Saaib Bin Yazeed may Allah be pleased with him, 'Uthmaan ordered another call

to be called from Az-Zawraa', and that is a place in a market, and that which 'Uthmaan did, may Allah be

pleased with him, was so that the people prepare themselves and attend the Friday prayer. This was Ijtihaad

from 'Uthmaan, may Allah The Most High be pleased with him, and Ibn 'Umar said, as is found in the

Musannaf of Ibn Abee Shaybah, that the first Adhaan for Friday is an innovation.

And as for the Hadeeth 'Upon you is my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly guided caliphs, hold onto it

with your molar teeth' then the best who has spoken about it, according to what I have come to know of, is

Abu Mohammed 'Alee Bin Ahmed Bin Sa'eed, may Allah The Most High have mercy upon him, widely

known as Ibn Hazm. He said: 'Either that we take all of the Sunnah of the rightly guided caliphs, and that is

not possible because they differed, or either that we reject all of it and that is clear misguidance, because

from their Sunnah is that which agrees with the Sunnah of the messenger of Allah. Or either we take from

their Sunnah that which agrees with the book of Allah and the Sunnah of the messenger of Allah '. He

(i.e. Shaykh Muqbil) said: And this is our statement, Shaykh Al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah The

Most High have mercy upon him, said in his book (At-Tawassal Wal-Waseelah) of which its meaning is:

There is nobody that has a Sunnah along (or equal) with the messenger of Allah .

And likewise Al-Haakim mentioned before Shaykh Al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah as he mentions from Yahya

Bin Aadam that he said:

There is nobody that has a Sunnah along (or equal) with the messenger of Allah . It used to be said: The Sunnah of Abu Bakr and 'Umar, so that it is known that these Sunnah were acted upon in the time of

Abu Bakr and 'Umar, and the Lord of all strength said in his noble book:

This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you

Islam as your religion (Al-Maa'idah 3)



And He the Most High said:

Follow what has been sent down unto you from your Lord, and follow not any Auliya', besides Him. Little

do you remember (Al-A'raaf 3)

As for the Hadeeth Follow those after me, Abu Bakr and 'Umar then this is also not related to the topic, because 'Uthmaan was the first to start this, then what we believe is that the Hadeeth is weak because it is

from the narration of Rubee' Bin Harraash, from Hudhayfah, and he did not hear from Hudhayfah, and also

the slave of Rubee is vague and unknown.

Then it is known from this that the first Adhaan is not Sunnah, and deriving from this is another affair, and

that is the prayer between the two Adhaans. Perhaps some will use the Hadeeth as a proof: between every two Adhaans is a prayer. However I have already explained that the first Adhaan is not affirmed.

When the prophet rose upon the pulpit he would begin his sermon or the saying of as-Salaamu 'Alaikum.

For many Hadeeth are found regarding this, there is not one Hadeeth from them without this speech,

however it is by compilation of its paths, valid as a proof with the degree of 'Hassan' (i.e. sound). So it is

known from this that the first Adhaan is not Sunnah and it is not appropriate that a Muslim acts with it,

rather 'Uthmaan made Ijtihaad and Ijtihaad can be correct or erroneous. The messenger of Allah said:

Upon you is my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly guided caliphs, hold onto it with your molar teeth

And he said:

And beware of newly invented matters, for every newly invented matter is innovation. Rather the

messenger said Verily Allah has prevented repentance upon every person of innovation until he leaves his innovation related by at-Tabaraanee and Ibn Abee 'Aasim from the Hadeeth of Anas and al-Haafidh Al-Mundhiree said: its chain (of narration) is Hassan (sound). end of his statement

[Answering the Questioner page 333].

And he was asked may Allah have mercy upon him: Is every person of Innovation an Innovator? And what

is the correlation between innovation and the innovators?

So he answered:

No, not every person of innovation is an innovator, for 'Uthmaan, may Allah be pleased with him, ordered with the first Adhaan of az-Zawraa', and when Abdullah Bin 'Umar entered into a Masjid that the first

Adhaan was being called in he abandoned it and said: Verily it is a Masjid of innovation. Nevertheless, he did not say that 'Uthmaan is an innovator, rather 'Uthmaan made Ijtihaad, and whoever was after

'Uthmaan, if the proof became apparent and he (still) blindly followed 'Uthmaan upon this (i.e. the first

Adhaan), then he is regarded as an innovator because blind following in itself is an innovation


Whoever wants to pursue an increase in statements of the people of knowledge then he can return to the

book (Ahkaam Al-Jumu'ah) of Shaykh Yahya al-Hajooree, may Allah preserve him, and if it was not for

fear of prolongation then I would have quoted them all.



Al-Barmakee Al-Haddaadee said: Al-Hajooree, as is well known, misinterpreted the Hadeeth of al-Irbaadh Bin Saariyah, may Allah be pleased with him, with a very bizarre interpretation. For he thought

that the intent of the Hadeeth is that 'their method of understanding the book and the Sunnah, for indeed

nobody has a Sunnah along with the messenger of Allah , even if it be the rightly guided caliphs'! And

this is how he said it in his explanation of 'Laamiyyah' of Shaykh Al-Islaam on page 34 end of his statement

I (Yaasir) say: Al-Imaam Al-Mufassir Muhammad al-Ameen ash-Shinqeetee said regarding the explanation

of Surah Muhammad in (Adhwaa' al-Bayaan):

Because the Sunnah of the rightly guided caliphs is the following of the messenger of Allah , and the precedence of his Sunnah above all (other) things. So upon all of us is to act with the like of what they used

to act upon in order that we are those that are followers of the Sunnah of the messenger of Allah and

their Sunnah. end of his statement

Ibn Hazm- may Allah have mercy upon him- said:

So then everyone other than the messenger of Allah is (sometimes) erroneous and (sometimes) correct.

So if somebody says: It has been mentioned from the messenger of Allah : 'Upon you is my Sunnah, and

the Sunnah of the rightly guided caliphs after me'. We say (i.e. to this person): The Sunnah of the caliphs,

may Allah be pleased with them, is (in itself) following his Sunnah , and as for what they did by way of

Ijtihaad then it is not obligatory to follow their Ijtihaad in that. And it is authentic from Abu Bakr, 'Umar,

'Uthmaan, 'Alee, Ibn Az-Zubayr, Khaalid Bin Al-Waleed and other than them: (that they saw) the retaliation

for slapping (correct), however the Hanafees, Maalikees and Shafe'ees do not assert this. end of his statement

[Al-Muhallah 11th

volume page 357/3596]

I have already quoted these two statements in the first part (of this series); however the Haddaadee does not

take heed.

Al-Barmakee al-Haddaadee said:

So 'Alee- may Allah be pleased with him- considered the action of 'Umar- may Allah be pleased with him- a Sunnah and he characterised it as that (i.e. as a Sunnah). So then what did Al-Hajooree do with this

narration!? (the narration) that is an irrefutable proof against him and his Hizb. Al-Hajooree said in

'Ahkaam Al-Jumu'ah', and (this statement) is from the additions of the new print page 448-449:

'Note: The statement of 'Alee, may Allah be pleased with him, caused ambiguity upon some of the people

concerning this issue, when he gave forty lashes to the one who drank alcohol. He (Alee) said: The

prophet gave forty lashes for alcohol, Abu Bakr gave forty lashes and 'Umar (gave) eighty. All of it was

(considered) a Sunnah, and this is more beloved to me. It was gathered by Muslim, number 4432.



And the answer is: It is as has proceeded, that the Sunnah linguistically means 'way', and when the way of the messenger of Allah contradicts with (a way that belongs to) other than him then it is obligatory to take

the way of the messenger of Allah. And when there is only the way of that companion and it has no

contradiction from a statement of other than him, then his statement is a Sunnah that is adhered to.

Therefore the establishment of 'Alee is a beautiful establishment, when he clarified that the action of 'Umar

was Sunnah, and he (i.e. 'Alee) took the Sunnah of the messenger of Allah. We say to these people who

justify (what they follow) with the statement of 'Alee do just as 'Alee did, may Allah be pleased with him. This does not mean that the two Sunnahs are equal and that the abandonment of the Sunnah of the messenger of Allah due to the statement or action of other than him is permissible. So then ponder upon

this and you will be safe from being mistaken between the guidance of the messenger of Allah which is

ordered upon every Muslim, and between the Ijtihaad of other than him that came after him. end of his statement

I (Yaasir) say: the speech of Shaykh Yahya is unobjectionable, Imaam al-Waade'ee said:

And likewise al-Haakim mentioned it before Shaykh al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah, he mentioned from Yahya Bin Aadam that he said: 'There is nobody that has a Sunnah along (or equal) with the messenger of

Allah '.

Rather it used to be said: The Sunnah of Abu Bakr and 'Umar, so that it is known that these Sunnah were

acted upon in the time of Abu Bakr and 'Umar, and the Lord of all might said in his noble book:

This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you

Islam as your religion (Al-Maa'idah 3)

And He the Most High said:

Follow what has been sent down unto you from your Lord, and follow not any Auliya', besides Him. Little

do you remember (Al-A'raaf 3)

end of his statement [Answering the Questioner page 333]

There is no contradiction between that which Al-Haddaadee (al-Barmakee) quoted from the statements of

'The Sincere Advisor' when he said: There is nobody that has a Sunnah along (or equal) with the

messenger of Allah i.e. there is nobody that has a legislation, and when he said: The Sunnah of Abu Bakr i.e. his way, for he made a distinction between the two meanings.

The Alleged Tampering

The Haddaadee (Al-Barmakee) claimed against 'The Sincere Advisor' that he tampered with the speech of

Shaykh al-Islaam, for how atrocious is this accusation and how false it is? For ash-Shaykh Yahya, may

Allah preserve him, does not tamper with the speech of the people of knowledge. For when he quoted the

speech of Shaykh al-Islaam he abridged it to the part that was intended and he put dots to show that he had

removed something from the speech as an abridgement and as a removal of confusion from the reader, and

there is nothing wrong with that as is apparent.



Rather, every single offence was in that which the Haddaadee (al-Barmakee) did from atrocious tampering

with the speech of 'The Sincere Advisor' and other than him from the people of knowledge, upon what I

have clarified in the first part of: Repelling the Enmity of al-Barmakee the Disgraceful one and every single offence was in the awful shameless tampering along with Abdur-Rahmaan Bin Mar'ee (Al-'Adanee)

with the speech of 'The Sincere Advisor' which he narrated to Shaykh 'Ubayd regarding the Islamic

university (of Madinah), upon what Shaykh Yahya has clarified, may Allah preserve him, in: The Clarification to what came in the 'Knowledge Based Notifications' and 'The Correct Criticism'1.

Shaykh Yahya said:

So in this condition, if you study in the Islamic University, then be on high alert (warning) from those who sit with the Hizbees. And all praise is due to Allah, Salafi teachers and students are found, so sit with them

Inshallah `And what is not encompassed in full, is not left off altogether.' And your studying in the Islamic

University with being strongly warned against Hizbees is better than ignorance. And your studying in the

Islamic University with indulgence in Hizbiyyah and innovation and misguidance - then ignorance is better

than this. The ignorance that you are in with your being free from Hizbiyyah, and Hizbiyyah is innovation

and you are upon the Sunnah.... end of his statement

Do you know dear reader what the Hizbees quoted to Shaykh 'Ubayd?!! They only quoted that (part) which

is underlined (from the above passage)!! Is this not from shameless tampering, from desiring fitnah and the

ignition of the fire of enmity and hatred??

Why do the Hizbees collect the speech of Shaykh Yahya, distort it and play around with it?

Is this from the action of Ahlus-Sunnah or the action of the innovators, the people of desires like Al-

Kawtharee and Hasan Saqaaf? Is this the action of the one who loves clarity and purity? Or the one who

loves playing around, distortion and lying?

Shaykh Yahya, may Allah preserve him, said, and he was addressing 'Ubayd Al-Jaabiree:

But perhaps you have been deceived by the speech because of the omission and tampering that occurred (from what you narrated) of my detailed speech in which I said contextually: "The Salafis in it are

strangers." So my speech was transmitted in the beginning of "The Knowledge based notifications" and my

clear examples were omitted along with other than them. From them: "The Islamic University has Salafis

and Hizbees". And from them: 'my answer to the last question from our brothers from Jeddah in which he

asked ' What is your advice to the one who wants to join the Islamic University?"

I said in reply:

"The Islamic University has Hizbees and Salafis in it". And we said after a few phrases in the questions

from Jeddah which he (Shaykh 'Ubayd) narrated from or was narrated to him:

1 This benefitial article can be downloaded from the following link: http://www.aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?t=3508



"So in this condition, if you study in the Islamic University, then be on high alert (warning) from those who

sit with the hizbees. And all praise is due to Allah, Salafi teachers and students are found, so sit with them

if Allah wills. `And what is not encompassed in full, is not left off altogether.' And your studying in the

Islamic University with being strongly warned against Hizbees is better than ignorance. ((And your

studying in the Islamic University with indulgence in Hizbiyyah and innovation and misguidance - then

ignorance is better than this)). The ignorance that you are in with your being free from Hizbiyyah, and

Hizbiyyah is innovation and you are upon the sunnah."

So the speech came in a tampered state, he received from it (the following) words as is in

'Notifications'((And your studying in the Islamic University with indulgence in Hizbiyyah and innovation

and misguidance - then ignorance is better than this) and the clarification before it was deleted - from the

existence of Salafis in the university from amongst students and teachers etc. And my advice to the

aforementioned questioner was that if he studies in the Islamic University to be on alert (warned) from

those who sit with Hizbees; and to sit with the Salafis. This deletion is what surprised me in the first

clarification entitled 'The Knowledge Based Notifications'. And this answer (of mine) was (the same) about

two years back or more. And my reply about a week before Shaykh 'Ubayd's 'Knowledge Based

Notifications' came was no different as I explained in detail in the 'Clear Notification'!!. end of his

statement

Perhaps it has become clear to the reader the obnoxiousness of this Hizb, and that the plotting of the lying

Haddaadiyyah has become clear, and shortly a further explanation will follow- Inshallah- of their condition,

and the refutations upon them will never cease- Inshallah- until they return to the truth and they return from

their Hizbiyyah and leave off from slandering the 'Ulamaa of the Ummah. It has already begun to become

clear that the Mar'iyyah (i.e. the Hizb of Abdur-Rahmaan Bin Mar'ee Al-'Adanee) is from the branches of

al-Haddaadiyyah just as the Bakriyyah (i.e. the Hizb of Saalih al-Bakree) is also from its branches. Shaykh

Muhammad Al-Imaam has already said about the Mar'iyyah that:

it is the new Bakriyyah

[Questions of the people of Qusay'ar]

Rather Ibn Mar'ee acknowledged this himself in the gathering of the Mashaayikh as he said:

I do not disavow that after the Fitnah of al-Bakaree, some people came to me and said 'Al-Bakree has fallen, so now you stand up'

[Mukhtasarul-Bayyaan]

He in reality has actually stood and is very engrossed in these events. If he (i.e. the reader) notices

evidently the connection between the Bakriyyah and the Mar'iyyah, and he increases in certainty when he

knows that al-Bakree was 'The Haddaadee of Yemen' just as Faalih (al-Harbee) was 'The Haddaadee of The

Kingdom (Of Saudi Arabia)'. If you have come to know that: Then know that Ibn Mar'ee and Al-Wasaabee

both give lectures with al-Bakree in his Masjid, rather according to them he is now: from the 'Ulamaa of Ahlus-Sunnah.

So then do not be Foolish Oh Salafi, indeed the calamities encircle you!!!

END

part 7 repelling the enmity of al-barmakee the disgraceful one part 2

Documents

adhaan of uthmaan

speech alimaam alwaadeee

ashshaykh yahya

adhaan of az

almusawwadah page

shaykh http

series of refutations

shaykh bin baaz