pathophysiologie des glomérulonéphrites...
TRANSCRIPT
30/07/2016
1
Pathophysiologie des glomérulonéphrites
extra-membraneuses
Pierre Ronco
Unité INSERM 1155
Service de Néphrologie
Hôpital Tenon
43ème Séminaire d'enseignement du CUEN
6 Juin 2016
Outline of the lecture
• Background and review of recent pathophysiologicaladvances
• From the bench to the bedside
- diagnostic tests
- predictive value of antibodies
- treatment monitoring
• Exogenous antigens
• Perspectives
30/07/2016
2
Membranous Nephropathy
Major cause of nephrotic syndrome and chronic renal failure
Aetiologies of membranous nephropathy
• 30% associated with
:- infections
- cancers
- autoimmune diseases
- drugs
• 70% « idiopathic forms »
Treatment is controversial because of unpredictable outcome vs
side-effects and lack of pathophysiology-driven therapy
•
• Proteinuria as the only biomarker for disease follow-up!
30/07/2016
3
Walter Heymann, Cleveland, 1959
Heymann nephritis
Renal BB IgG deposits Megalin, the target
antigen of HN
In situ formation of immune deposits
Podocytes
Endothelium
Rat: megalin
Human?
GBM
Proteinuria
Activation of
complement
Kerjaschki and Farquhar PNAS 1982, 79:5557 ; Ronco et al J Immunol 1986, 136:125
30/07/2016
4
The case : Hugo D. (male gender)
• 34 Wks of gestation : oligohydramnios and enlarged
kidneys
• 38 Wks : birth
• 1st Days of life : respiratory distress and oligoanuria,
followed by nephrotic range proteinuria and increased
blood pressure
• 4 Wks : CT-guided kidney biopsy
• Negative tests for syphilis, toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus
and hepatitis -B virus infections
• Negative Coombs’ test. Normal levels of complement
components at day 35
Debiec et al. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:2053
Antigen identification from an extreme phenotype :
Neonatal membranous nephropathy
IgG
Infant born with MN and nephrotic
syndromePLACENTA
C5b-9
MOTHER FETUS
Debiec et al. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346:2053
NEP
NEP
NEP
anti-NEP IgG
Blot: anti-NEP mAb
mother control1 2
83
175
1 2
Asymptomatic Transient nephrotic syndrome
NEP : neutral
endopeptidase
30/07/2016
5
III
A A C C T C T A CA A C T C T A C T
Wild-type
A
Wild-type Heterozygote
T C C G A G A A T C C G A G AA T C T G A G A
Heterozygote Homozygote
AA CC TC TAC A A C T C TAC T
7
15
Portugal Netherlands, Morocco,
Germany, Italy
466delCP156fsX169
1342C→TR448X
ATG TGA
7 153 2419exon
MME cDNA
Membranous nephropathy : a monogenic diseaseAll mothers have truncating mutations in MME gene
From antigen identification
to genetic defect
IgG
PLACENTA
anti-NEP IgG
MOTHER
NEP
NEPNEP deficient
FETUS
Genetic defect
Five families
Morocco Netherlands Portugal Germany Italy
Debiec et al. N Engl J Med 2002 and Lancet 2004
Y
GBM
30/07/2016
6
Auto-immune « idiopathic » MN in adults
Principle of pangenomic (GWAS) studies
30/07/2016
7
From polygenic disease
to rare association of common variants
556 Patients ; 2338 controls (Euro MN Consortium = F+UK+NL)
Stanescu et al, New Engl J Med, 2011, 364: 616 ; Coenen et al, J Am Soc Nephrol,
2013,24:677
PLA2R1
HLA-DQA1
No mutation
in PLA2R1
coding sequence
Risk of MN x 80
Are anti-PLA2R antibodies pathogenic?
• Transfer experiments impossible because of lack of expression
of PLA2R in mouse, rat and rabbit podocytes
• Lack of experimental model
• Strong predictive value of anti-PLA2R antibody
• Recurrence after transplantation : « The human model » of
passive Heymann nephritis
• Exceptional case of recurrence related to PLA2R IgG3k mAb
(Debiec et al, JASN 2012, 23:1949)
30/07/2016
8
Direct effect of autoantibodies :
The example of PLA2R
C
G1106S
M292V
H300D
Internalization
Degradation
ROS production and
activation of DNA-
damage pathways
MAPK activation
Lipid mediator
production
N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
CRD FN2D CTLD
Positive regulator
Negative regulator
Extracellular domain
Conformation-dependent epitopes
TMD
CD
Putative PLA2
binding
domain
Debiec et al, Semin Immunopathol 2014, 36:381
A new podocyte antigen in adult patients with
MN : THSD7A
N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
CRD FN2DCTLD
TMD
CDPutative PLA2
binding domainN 1
Conformational epitope is
located in this region
31 mer peptide from this domain
A
B
TMD
CDN
Trombospondin type-1 domains TSDs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
RGD
motif
PLA2R
Thrombospondin type-1 domain containing 7A (THSD7A)
Kao et al, JASN 2014 ,
Sept 9 ;
Fresquet et al,
JASN 2014, Oct 6
Tomas et al, NEJM 2014,
371: 2277
10 % of PLA2R-negative patients with MN
30/07/2016
9
Outline of the lecture
• Background and review of recent pathophysiologicaladvances
• From the bench to the bedside
- diagnostic tests
- predictive value of antibodies
- treatment monitoring
• Exogenous antigens
• Perspectives
Hoxha E et al, NDT 2011, 26:2526
30/07/2016
10
Specificity and sensitivity of PLA2R antibody
Debiec ,Tesar and Ronco; Hofstra JASN 2012 ;
Hoxha et al, NDT 2011, KI 2012; Qin et al, JASN 2011
iMN SLE Cancer HBV GvH DC HC
N=689
70%
Po
siti
ve
fo
r a
nti
-PLA
2R
(%
)
100
75
50
25
N=71
2%
N=21
19%
N=19
15%
N=17
12%
N=90
0%
N=153
0%
« Secondary » MN
Meta-analysis (2014)
- 15 studies, 2212 patients
- Specificity = 99%
(95% CI : 96-100%)
- Sensitivity = 78%
(95% CI :66-87%)
Du et al, PLoSOne 2014, 9:e104936
Antigen detection in biopsy
is more sensitive than serology
Tenon cohort 2000-2014
- n = 106 (84 iMN ; 22 sMN)
- sensitivity PLA2R - Ag : 86%
- ‘’ aPLA2R-Ab : 76%
Pourcine et al, unpublished
Retrospective
diagnosis
Debiec and Ronco, New Engl J Med, 2011, 364 :689 ; Svobodova et al, NDT,
2013, 28:1839 ; Hofstra et al, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2012, 23:1735 ;
Ruggenenti et al, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2015, March 24
30/07/2016
11
There are exceptions…..
Secondary MN and PLA2R
Lupus MN HepB Sarcoidosis
Coincidence of iMN with the associated disease ?
Stehlé T et al, NDT 2015, 30:1047
IgG subclass distribution according
to underlying disease
IgG1 IgG2 IgG3 IgG4
Idiopathic + to +++ + + +++
Lupus +++ +++ ++ ±
Neoplasia +++ +++ + 0 to ++
Recurrent MN in the
allograft
++ ++ + +++
De novo MN in the
allograft
+++ ++ - +
Noël LH et al, Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1988, 46:186 ; Ohtani et al, NDT, 2004,
19:574 ; Qu et al, NDT 2012, 27:1931 ; Debiec, personal data ; Markowitz,
personal data
30/07/2016
12
Management of newly diagnosed MN
Newly diagnosed
Membranous nephropathy
1. Anti-PLA2R & PLA2R Antigen
in kidney biopsy
2. IgG subclasses in biopsy
3. N° inflam. cells per glomeruli
Antibody/Ag (-) OR IgG1-2
predominance OR > 8
inflammatory cells per glomeruli
Secondary MN
Search for cancer
Antibody/Ag (+) AND IgG4
predominance AND inflammatory
cells per glomeruli ≤ 8
Idiopathic MN
Stop investigation except if
personal and hereditary
cancer risk factors
Cambier J and Ronco P,
Clin JASN, 2012 7:1701
High levels of PLA2R-Ab are correlated with :
• A lower rate of remission, either spontaneous or
induced by IS treatment
• A higher risk :
- of occurrence of nephrotic syndrome in non-
nephrotic patients
- of renal function deterioration
• A longer time to remission under IS treatment
Kanigicherla D et al, Kidney Int 2013 83: 940 ;
Hofstra JM et al, JASN 2012 23: 1735 ; Hoxha E et al, JASN 2014 25:1357 ;
Ruggenenti P et al, JASN 2015, March 14; Hoxha E et al, PLoS One 2014 9:e110681
30/07/2016
13
Percent changes in proteinuria, serum
albumin and anti-PLA2R antibody levels
-100
-50
0
50
100
0 6 12 18 241 3 9
months
Anti PLA2R autoantibody
Y = -77.926+0.770*(X^-2-.975)-0.404*(X^3-1.038)
Time to 50% decrease = 0.65 months
24-h Proteinuria
Y = -46.89-99.379*(X^0.5-1.006)+24.376*(X-1.0125)
Time to 50% decrease = 10.5 months
Serum Albumin
Y = 45.91+ 19.810*(ln(X)-0.0124)+0.179*(X^3-1.038)
Time to 50% increase = 11.4 months
Me
an
pe
rce
nt
cha
ng
e v
s b
ase
lin
e
Y =mean percent change vs baseline
X = (time+1)/10
Ruggenenti, Debiec,…, Ronco, Remuzzi, J Am Soc Nephrol 2015 26:2545
13 13 13 12 11 10 9 8 6 4 2
31 31 27 26 24 16 16 12 12 11 10
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
months
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
10 10 10 9 8 8 8 8 6 4 2
31 31 27 26 24 16 16 12 12 11 10
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
Unadjusted HR (95%CI): 7.68 (2.04-28.91 ); p=0.003
Adjusted HR (95%CI): 6.70 (1.68-26.81); p=0.007
Increase YES
Increase NO
Patients at risk
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f p
ati
en
ts w
ith
re
lap
se
of
the
ne
ph
roti
c sy
nd
rom
e
Increase YES
Increase NO
Emergence YES
Emergence NO
Patients at risk
months
Unadjusted HR (95%CI): 7.03 (1.80-27.44 ); p=0.00
Adjusted HR (95%CI): 6.54 (1.57-27.14); p=0.010
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f p
ati
en
ts w
ith
re
lap
se
of
the
ne
ph
roti
c sy
nd
rom
e
Re-emergence YES
Re-emergence NO
PLA2R Ab titer increase or antibody re-emergence is
associated with a high risk of relapse
Ruggenenti, Debiec,…, Ronco, Remuzzi, J Am Soc Nephrol 2015 26:2545
30/07/2016
14
Anti-PLA2R antibodies predict
relapse rate after IS therapy
Bech et al, Clin JASN 2014, 9:1386
• Recurrent : about 50% anti-PLA2R
• De novo : 0
• In patients with a positive test at the time of TP there is
~80% chance of recurrence but 20% have not recurred
for up to 9 years (PPV=83%)
• If the test is negative there is still a 50% chance of
recurrence (NPV=42%)
Debiec et al, Am J Transplant 2011, 11:2144 ;
Debiec et al, JASN 2012, 23:1949 ; Larsen and Walker, Transplantation 2013 ;
Kattah A et al, Am J Transplant, 2015 15:1349
Can anti-PLA2R be useful for the diagnosis and
monitoring of patients with recurrent
and de novo MN?
30/07/2016
15
What should we do in 2016?
• Assess anti-PLA2R antibody in all adult patients with a suspected
diagnosis of MN, starting with the IF test (specificity, 100% ;
sensitivity, 70 to 80%), and anti-THSD7A antibody in PLA2R-
negative patients
• Search for PLA2R antigen in kidney biopsies from all patients with
MN, and for THSD7A in PLA2R-negative biopsies
• Determine Ig subclass in kidney biopsies from all patients with MN
• Monitor anti-PLA2R antibody titer during follow-up and in grafted
patients with MN
Outline of the lecture
• Background and review of recent pathophysiologicaladvances
• From the bench to the bedside
- diagnostic tests
- predictive value of antibodies
- treatment monitoring
• Exogenous antigens
• Perspectives
30/07/2016
16
Antibodies and their targets
Y
Y
PLA2R/THSD7A
Y
Y
NEP
Y Y
Placenta
Maternal alloantibodies
Autoantibodies
A Endogenous antigen
and allo- or autoantibodies
Debiec et al, Semin Immunopathol 2014, 36:381
Planted
antigen Pathogenic
antibodies
Immunization
Y
Y YY
Food Therapeutic proteins Viruses
cBSA Arylsulfatase,
α-glucosidase
Hep B
Exogenous antigen and allo- or
xenoantibodies
B
α-enolase
SOD2
Aldose reductase
• Understand the genetic bases of disease
triggering, spontaneous remission and progression
by next generation sequencing
• Identify additional antigens and T cell populations
involved in triggering and progression
• Design new therapeutic strategies
What’s next ?
30/07/2016
17
33
From the podocyte to new therapeutic
approaches of autoimmune diseases
33
C5b-9 complex
Ubiquitin
proteasome
system
ER
stressDepletion of B-cells
(non specific)
Inhibiting complement
activation
Protecting the podocyte
Eliminating environmental factors:
diet, toxin
Depletion of B-cells
producing pathogenic
antibodies
Development of
antibody traps or
decoys
Reducing
autoantibodies
Inhibitors of ER stress
IgG Debiec et al, Lancet, 2015, 385:1983
Drug designB. Iorga, CNRS Gif
Quantum Rattle
Humbury, PNAS 2015
D. Bazin & C. Sanchez,
Collège de France
The expanding spectrum of human
membranous nephropathies
• Neonatal, alloimmune : NEP
• Early childhood MN : cationic BSA
• Enzymotherapy-induced MN in patients treated with ERT
- a-glucosidase
- arylsulfatase
• « Idiopathic » MN
- 75-85%: PLA2R (+ other specificities : AR, SOD2, enolase…?)
- <10 %: THSD7A (10% of PLA2R negative MN), associated with cancer?
• Secondary MN : Hep B antigens, other antigens to be identified
• Graft MN :
- Recurrent : PLA2R (> 50%)
- De novo : allo-immune
30/07/2016
18
• Substitute molecular signatures for
uniform histological definition : Towards
new ontology…
• ….and personalized medicine, diagnostic
and therapy (specific immunoadsorption)
30/07/2016
19
Bergamo (I)
G. Remuzzi
P. Ruggenenti
Nijmegen (NL)
J. Wetzels
J. Hofstra
UK
R. Kleta (London)
P. Brenchley (Manchester)
CNG (Evry)
D. Bacq-Daian
V. Guigonis (Limoges, F)
A. Bensman (Paris, F)
G. Deschênes (Paris, F)
P. Niaudet (Paris, F)
T. Ulinski (Paris, F)
J. Nauta (Rotterdam, NL)
F. Janssen (Brussels, B)
J. Nortier (Brussels, B)
D. Bockenhauer (London, UK)
M. Kemper (Hamburg, D)
F. Emma, M. Vivarelli (Rome, I)
B. Stengel (Paris, F)
Acknowledgments
Paediatricians