pdd tcl c 03 off gas final

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 1

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM

SIMPLIFIED PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FOR SMALL-SCALE PROJECT ACTIVITIES (SSC-CDM-PDD)

Version 02

CONTENTS

A. General description of the small-scale project activity B. Baseline methodology C. Duration of the project activity / Crediting period D. Monitoring methodology and plan E. Calculation of GHG emission reductions by sources F. Environmental impacts G. Stakeholders comments Annexes Annex 1: Information on participants in the project activity Annex 2: Information regarding public funding


Revision history of this document Version Number

Date Description and reason of revision

01 21 January 2003

Initial adoption

02 8 July 2005 • The Board agreed to revise the CDM SSC PDD to reflect guidance and clarifications provided by the Board since version 01 of this document.

• As a consequence, the guidelines for completing CDM SSC PDD have been revised accordingly to version 2. The latest version can be found at <http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Documents>.

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 3 SECTION A. General description of the small-scale project activity A.1. Title of the small-scale project activity: Off gases utilisation from C – 03 washing tower in Primary Reformer as fuel, Version 01, 1 November 2005. A.2. Description of the small-scale project activity: Tata Chemicals commissioned its fertiliser division in December 1994, in Babrala in the Badaun district of Uttar Pradesh state in northern India. The complex manufactures urea, a widely used chemical fertiliser, and has an installed capacity of 8,64,600 tonnes per year, which constitutes nearly 12 per cent of the total urea produced by the country's private sector. The complex also houses an ammonia plant with a capacity of 1,520 tonnes per day. The project is implemented in the Babrala fertiliser division. Purpose of the project activity The CO2 supplied in the Ammonia Plant of Tata Chemicals Limited at Babrala, contains about 0.4 ~ 0.6% H2 and about 0.2 ~ 0.3% N2 and the liquid ammonia contains CH4 in traces. A small amount of air is also added in the CO2 before feeding it to Urea reactor, for passivation of the inside surfaces of the high pressure equipments so as to prevent the corrosion from carbamate. As the Ammonia and CO2 are converted to Urea and H2; CH4, N2, O2 do not take part in reaction and have to be vented out from the Urea process. All these gases are vented out from C-03 (MP inerts washing tower) into the atmosphere. This is as per the design of Snamprogetti. The available quantity of the off gas from each unit is 500 Nm3/hr at the pressure of 15 kg/cm2 and temperature 50°C. Therefore the total available quantity from both the units is 1000 Nm3/hr. Under TCL’s energy improvement drive (MANTHAN) and considering CDM opportunities; their team decided to stop the venting of the C – 03 off gases and use the same as fuel in the primary reformer. A system was conceptualized to utilize these gases as a fuel in Primary Reformer in the Ammonia Plant by tapping the entire quantity from C – 03 inerts washing tower. Due to this project was that TCL could recover energy from energy rich gases which were being vented out into the atmosphere. Based on the calorific value of Hydrogen, Methane, and Ammonia that TCL gained around 1.7 Gcal / hr of energy. This resulted in a reduction in fuel consumption and thus a reduction in air emissions. Project’s contribution to sustainable development The project activity contributes to environmental and social aspects and eventually to sustainable development by:

• Saving non - renewable fuel like NG which is a step towards conserving natural resources. • Reducing carbon dioxide emissions. • Preventing the venting of methane and thereby reducing air pollution load.

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 4 A.3. Project participants: Name of Party involved ((host)

indicates a host Party)

Private and/or public

entity(ies) project participants

(as applicable)

Kindly indicate if the Party

involved wishes to be

considered as project

participant (Yes/No)

India (Host)

Ministry of Environmental &

Forest (MoEF), India

Tata Chemicals Limited (Private

entity)

No

Plant Address: Tata Chemicals Limited, Babrala plant, Indira Dham, Babrala 202 521, District Budaun,

Uttar Pradesh. Tel: (05836) 231 263; Fax: (05836) 231 257 / 58.

A.4. Technical description of the small-scale project activity:. A.4.1. Location of the small-scale project activity: India A.4.1.1. Host Party(ies): India A.4.1.2. Region/State/Province etc.: Uttar Pradesh A.4.1.3. City/Town/Community etc: Indira Dham, Babrala, District Budaun – 202 521. A.4.1.4. Detail of physical location, including information allowing the unique identification of this small-scale project activity(ies): The Babrala complex manufactures urea and has an installed capacity of 8,64,600 tonnes per year, which constitutes nearly 12 per cent of the total urea produced by the India's private sector. The complex also houses an ammonia plant with a capacity of 1,520 tonnes per day. This project is implemented at TCL, Indira Dham, Babrala, District Buduan, Uttar Pradesh, India. It is located at a distance of 92 Kms. from Badaun and 110 kms.from Bareilly on Chandausi-Babrala Road. The nearest railway station is Babrala which is 3 kms away. The plant is located at about 150 km from Delhi.

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 5 The project was installed in existing space in the Urea plant of the Babrala fertiliser division. The plant is based on the technology provided by license provider Haldor Topsoe and Snamprogetti.

A.4.2. Type and category(ies) and technology of the small-scale project activity: Type and Category of Project Activity The project meets the applicability criteria of the small-scale CDM project activity category, Type - III: Other Project Activities (D: Methane Recovery) of the ‘Indicative simplified baseline and monitoring methodologies for selected small scale CDM project activity categories’. Main Category: Type III – Other Project Activities Sub Category: D – Methane Recovery

MumbaiMumbai

DelhiDelhi

MithapurMithapur

BabralaBabrala

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 6 As per the provisions of appendix B of simplified modalities and procedures for small scale CDM project activities (version 06), Type III D “comprises of methane recovery from coalmines, agro-industries, landfills, wastewater treatment facilities and other sources”. The project activity is a small scale energy efficiency activity since the measures reduce anthropogenic emissions by sources and directly emit 5.365 kilo tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent annually (see section E.2 for detailed calculations) which is less than 15 kilo tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent annually, the defined threshold for small scale project activity Type – III D (reference Annex B of simplified modalities and procedures for small scale CDM project activities). The baseline and emission reduction calculations from the project would be based on paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of appendix B (version 06, dated 30 Sep 2005) and the monitoring methodology would be based on guidance provided in paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 of III D of the same appendix B A.4.3. Brief explanation of how the anthropogenic emissions of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHGs) by sources are to be reduced by the proposed small-scale project activity, including why the emission reductions would not occur in the absence of the proposed small-scale project activity, taking into account national and/or sectoral policies and circumstances: Without this project, TCL would have continued to vent 1000 m3 / hr of C – 03 off gases of which Methane quantity is 52 m3 / hr. This project eliminates Methane venting and also reduces the Natural Gas consumption as fuel. Prohibiting methane venting and reduction in use of natural gas leads to a reduction in GHG emissions from the baseline scenario. The total project emissions would amount to 5365 tons per year. A.4.3.1 Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period: The project activity would result into CO2 emission reduction of 53,650 tons for 10 years crediting period.

Years Annual estimation of emission reductions in

tonnes of CO2-e

2004 5365

2005 5365

2006 5365

2007 5365

2008 5365

2009 5365

2010 5365

2011 5365


2012 5365

2013 5365

Total estimated reductions (tonnes of CO2 e) 53650

Total no of crediting years 10 Annual average over the crediting period of

estimated reductions (tonnes of CO2 e) 53650

A.4.4. Public funding of the small-scale project activity: There is no public funding for this project. A.4.5. Confirmation that the small-scale project activity is not a debundled component of a larger project activity: According to appendix C of simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project activities, ‘debundling’ is defined as the fragmentation of a large project activity into smaller parts. A small-scale project activity that is part of a large project activity is not eligible to use the simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project activities. According to para 2 of appendix C1 A proposed small-scale project activity shall be deemed to be a debundled component of a large project activity if there is a registered small-scale CDM project activity or an application to register another small-scale CDM project activity:

With the same project participants; In the same project category and technology/measure; Registered within the previous 2 years; and Whose project boundary is within 1 km of the project boundary of the proposed small- scale

activity at the closest point According to above-mentioned points of de-bundling, TCL’s project activity is not a part of any of the above, therefore, considered as small scale CDM project activity. SECTION B. Application of a baseline methodology: B.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline methodology applied to the small-scale project activity:

1 Appendix C to the simplified M&P for the small-scale CDM project activities, http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/pac/ssclistmeth.pdf

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 8 The methodology used for this project is III.D Methane Recovery under the small scale methodologies Type III – Other Project Activities. B.2 Project category applicable to the small-scale project activity: As per the methodology, the project category III.D comprises methane recovery from coalmines, agro-industries, landfills, wastewater treatment facilities and other sources. The measures shall both reduce anthropogenic emissions by sources and directly emit less than 15 kilo tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent annually. Also CO2 emissions from combustion of non-biogenic methane shall be accounted for in the project activity. The project activity at TCL fits the above description as it comprises of methane recovery from C – 03 off gases. The total emissions by source and directly are 5.365 kilo tonnes of carbon dioxide which is less than 15 kilo tonnes of carbon dioxide. Also the origin of the methane is purely non – biogenic. B.3. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered small-scale CDM project activity: The project reduces anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases by sources below those that would have occurred in absence of the registered CDM project activity. As per the decision 17/cp.7 Para 43, a CDM project activity is additional if anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity. Barriers and Additionality Referring to attachment A to appendix B document of “indicative simplified baseline and monitoring methodologies for selected small scale CDM project activity categories”, project participants are required to provide a qualitative explanation to show that the project activity would not have occurred anyway, at least one of the listed elements. should be identified in concrete terms to show that the activity is either beyond the regulatory and policy requirement or improves compliance to the requirement by removing barrier(s); The guidance provided herein has been used to establish project additionality. The barriers that were considered are listed below:

a) Investment barrier b) Technological barrier c) Barrier due to prevailing practice d) Other barriers

TCL had to face various barriers to innovation and implementation that would prevent the installation of the new retrofit technology. The following section addresses some barriers faced by TCL to implement the new retrofit technology in their plant.

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 9 Barrier to innovation This project is the first ever attempt to use C – 03 off gases as fuel in the Primary Reformer in the plant designed on Snamprogetii technology. Even the latest plants of Snamprogetii do not have this feature. The evaluation, design and fabrication of the system to burn the off gases in the primary reformer were based entirely on in-house technical capabilities. This modification project technology is new to India and has now been achieved and implemented for the very first time for a fertiliser plant in India. This is proved from the fact that even the latest plants from Snamprogetti do not have a facility to consume the C – 03 off gases. The technology provider has also agreed in their communication that this is the first of its kind project in India. TCL has taken substantial efforts and also risks developing the project activity. Since the technology is new, the failure of the system may result in the stoppage of plant and / or an accident in the plant, which will result in heavy financial losses. TCL has therefore decided to cross the ‘high-risk’ technological barrier and to go ahead with CDM activity. If project is successful it has good replication potential across the fertilizer industries, particularly where similar urea reactors are functional. Thereby it would ensure that greater amount of CO2 reduction will take place across the globe wherein this technology is successfully applied. Barrier due to prevailing practice The project is not the prevailing practice in fertilizer industry in India (and even other countries) with similar technologies. Therefore TCL lacks the familiarity with such project. The TCL internal documents are available regarding risks associated with project implementation and operation. Technological barriers Since the use of C – 03 off gas as a fuel in the primary reformer is new, the risks associated with the unforeseen circumstances are not identified. The people at TCL are not trained in the aspects of handling these risks. Following are the potential risks identified.

1. During the time of commissioning of project, risk of project not synchronising with the prevailing

production process. TCL has managed to come over the risk eventually. 2. Risk of plant shutdown in future under scenario of malfunctioning of modified system under

abnormal production conditions, for which system is never tested in past. 3. The time lapsed during such production shutdown is likely to be high because TCL employees are

neither experienced, nor trained to handle such issues.

4. The C – 03 off gases contain O2 and H2 in a proportion which falls within the explosive limits of the mixture, still TCL has taken a step towards sustainability keeping in mind the huge risk prevailing due to the stated condition.

Following impacts of CDM fund are identified from the point of view of removal of barriers discussed above.

• CDM fund will provide additional coverage to the risk due to failure of project, shut down of plant and loss of production.

• CDM fund will provide security on account of any hazardous incident occurring due to the project activity.


• CDM funds will provide the training support to TCL employees in understanding operational accuracies and mitigation of risks associated.

• The fund will stimulate R&D efforts in TCL to find methods of mitigating risks and enhance replication of such projects in Fertilizer industry, to promote GHG abatement.

B.4. Description of how the definition of the project boundary related to the baseline methodology selected is applied to the small-scale project activity: As per the methodology the project boundary is the physical, geographical site of the methane recovery facility. In this project activity the project boundary would enclose the primary reformer and the C – 03 off gas inerts washing tower located in the ammonia plant. B.5. Details of the baseline and its development: As per the methodology, the emission baseline is the amount of methane that would be emitted to the atmosphere during the crediting period in the absence of the project activity. Further the baseline shall cover only the capture and flaring that would not have happened in the absence of the project activity. As the Ammonia and CO2 are converted to Urea and H2; CH4, N2, O2 do not take part in the reaction and have to be vented out from the Urea process. All these gases are vented out from C-03 (MP inerts washing tower) into the atmosphere. The project utilizes the entire quantity of the C – 03 off gas as fuel in the primary reformer. Therefore the baseline would be established as the state where the C – 03 off gases are vented out in the atmosphere form the C – 03 tower. Date of Completion: 30 May 2004. Contact Person: Consultants and employees of Tata Chemicals Limited, Babrala Plant, District Buduan, Uttar Pradesh. SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / Crediting period:

Primary Reformer

C 03 Off Gas Flow

Fuel

Project Boundary

C 03

TO VENT

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 11 C.1. Duration of the small-scale project activity: C.1.1. Starting date of the small-scale project activity: 1 June 2004 The project construction started in December 2003 and was commissioned in June 2004. C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the small-scale project activity: 30 years C.2. Choice of crediting period and related information: C.2.1. Renewable crediting period: Not opted. C.2.1.1. Starting date of the first crediting period: Not opted. C.2.1.2. Length of the first crediting period: Not opted. C.2.2. Fixed crediting period: C.2.2.1. Starting date: 1 July 2004 C.2.2.2. Length: 10 years SECTION D. Application of a monitoring methodology and plan: D.1. Name and reference of approved monitoring methodology applied to the small-scale project activity: The methodology used for this project is Main Category: Type III – Other Project Activities Sub Category: D – Methane Recovery Reference:

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 12 The monitoring methodology is based on guidance provided in paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 of III D of the Appendix B of the modalities and procedures for small – scale CDM project activities. “8. The amount of methane recovered and used as fuel or combusted shall be monitored, using flow

meters and analysing the methane content of the combusted gases either online, or with samples taken at least quarterly, and more frequently if the results show significant deviations from previous values.

9. Regular maintenance should ensure optimal operation of flares. The flare efficiency, defined as the

fraction of time in which the gas is combusted in the flare, multiplied by the efficiency of the flaring process, shall be monitored.

10. Flow meters, sampling devices and gas analysers shall be subject to regular maintenance, testing and

calibration to ensure accuracy.”

D.2. Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the small-scale project activity: As per the provisions of paragraph 14 of Draft simplified modalities and procedures for small scale CDM project activities [FCCC/CP/2002/7/Add.3, English, Page 21] the “Project participants may use the simplified baseline and monitoring methodologies specified in appendix B for their project category” if they meet the applicability criteria of small scale CDM project activity. Since the project activity is a small-scale CDM project of Type III D category, the monitoring methodology and plan has been developed in line with the guidance provided in paragraph 8, 9 and 10 of category III.D of Appendix B. Since the project is a methane recovery project, emission reduction quantity totally depends on the quantity of gas used as fuel in the primary reformer and the CH4 content of the gas. The methodology covers the monitoring of gas flow and CH4 content in the boundary. Para 7 of the methodology states, “The amount of methane recovered and used as fuel or combusted shall be monitored, using flow meters and analyzing the methane content of the combusted gases either online, or with samples taken at least quarterly, and more frequently if the results show significant deviations from previous values”. The monitoring process for this project is as follows:

1. The quantity of C – 03 off gas used as fuel in the primary reformer will be monitored, using flow

meters.

2. Analysis of the methane content of the combusted off gas either online, or with samples taken at least quarterly, and more frequently if the results show significant deviations from previous values.

3. Flow meters, sampling devices and gas analyzers shall be subject to regular maintenance, testing and calibration to ensure accuracy.

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 13 D.3 Data to be monitored: D.2.1.1. Data to be collected in order to monitor emissions from the project activity, and how this data will be archived: ID number(Please use numbers to ease cross-referencing to D.3)

Data variable

Source of data

Data unit

Measured (m), calculated (c) or estimated (e)

Recording frequency

Proportion of data to be monitored

How will the data be archived? (electronic/ paper)

Comment

D.3.(a).1 Flow of gas DCS Nm3/hr Measured Every day Total Paper Measured in the plant premises to the best accuracy and will be monitored shift – wise through DCS

D.3.(a).2 CH4 content Analysis report

% Measured Every day Total Paper Measured in the plant premises to the best accuracy and will be monitored through analysis reports.

D.4. Qualitative explanation of how quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) procedures are undertaken: Data

Uncertainty level of data (High/Medium/Low)

Explain QA/QC procedures planned for these data, or why such procedures are not necessary.

D.3.a.1 Low Yes, flow of C – 03 off gas is being monitored through an established procedure. D.3.a.2 Low Yes, the gas analysis for C – 03 off gas is performed through an established procedure.

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 14 D.5. Please describe briefly the operational and management structure that the project participant(s) will implement in order to monitor emission reductions and any leakage effects generated by the project activity:

D.6. Name of person/entity determining the monitoring methodology: TCL, their experts and consultants SECTION E.: Estimation of GHG emissions by sources: E.1. Formulae used: E.1.1 Selected formulae as provided in appendix B: Not applicable E.1.2 Description of formulae when not provided in appendix B: E.1.2.1 Describe the formulae used to estimate anthropogenic emissions by sources of GHGs due to the project activity within the project boundary: Step – 1: Estimate quantity of methane burnt (kg/hr)

Where,

414.2216

1004%×

×=

CHFgQm

General Manager

Manager / Dpty. Gen. Manager

Shift In – charge / Manager

Operator

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 15 Qm = Quantity of methane burnt (kg / hr) Fg = Flow of gases (Nm3 / hr) %CH4 = % Methane content in the off gas Molecular weight of CH4 = 16 Avogadro’s Constant = 22.414 Step – 2: Total Project Emissions (tons / year)

3302475.2 ×××=QmEproject Where, Eproject = Total Project Emissions (tons / year) Qm = Quantity of methane burnt (kg / hr) Based on stoichiometric calculations for Methane combustion (CH4 + 2CO2 = CO2 + 2H2O), complete combustion of 1 kg of Methane (CH4) releases 2.75 kg of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). E.1.2.2 Describe the formulae used to estimate leakage due to the project activity, where required, for the applicable project category in appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project activities No leakage due to project activity E.1.2.3 The sum of E.1.2.1 and E.1.2.2 represents the small-scale project activity emissions: Total project emissions = Eproject because of no leakage. E.1.2.4 Describe the formulae used to estimate the anthropogenic emissions by sources of GHGs in the baseline using the baseline methodology for the applicable project category in appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale CDM project activities: The baseline scenario has been established as the state where TCL would continue to vent the entire quantity of C – 03 off gas in to the atmosphere. Step – 1: Estimate methane flow (kg/hr)

414.2216

1004%×

×=

CHFgFm

Where, Fm = Flow of methane (kg / hr) Fg = Flow of gases (Nm3 / hr) %CH4 = % Methane content in the off gas Molecular weight of CH4 = 16 Avogadro’s Constant = 22.414 Step – 2: Total Baseline Emissions (tons / year)


330241000

21×××= FmEbaseline

Where, Ebaseline = Total Baseline Emissions (tons / year) Fm = Flow of methane (kg / hr) IPCC emission factor for CH4 = 21 E.1.2.5 Difference between E.1.2.4 and E.1.2.3 represents the emission reductions due to the project activity during a given period:

Total emission reduction (Ce) = Total baseline emissions (Ebaseline) – Total project emissions (Eproject)

Ce = Ebaseline – Eproject E.2 Table providing values obtained when applying formulae above: Baseline Emissions:

Date Flow of Gas (Nm3 / hr)

CH4 content (%)

Methane Flow (kg/hr)

Total baseline Emissions (tons / yr)

Fg %CH4 Fm Ebaseline

Yearly 1000 5.2 37.12 6174

Project Emissions:

Date Flow of Gas (Nm3 / hr)

CH4 content (%)

Quantity of Methane burnt (kg/hr)

Total baseline Emissions (tons / yr)

Fg %CH4 Qm Eproject

Yearly 1000 5.2 37.12 808

Emission Calculation:

Date Total Baseline Emissions (tons / yr)

Total Project Emissions (tons / yr)

Total Emission Reduction (tons / yr)

Ebaseline Eproject Ce

Yearly 6174 808 5365

Sample Calculation: (Project Scenario)


hrkgQm /12.37414.22

16100

2.51000=×

×=

yrtonsCe /8083302475.2119.37 =×××=

SECTION F.: Environmental impacts: F.1. If required by the host Party, documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity: The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), Government of India, under the Environment Impact Assessment Notification vide S.O. 60(E) dated 27/01/94 has listed a set of industrial activities in Schedule I of the notification which for setting up new projects or modernization/ expansion will require environmental clearance and will have to conduct an Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) study. . The project activity - Off gases utilisation from C – 03 washing tower in Primary Reformer as fuel does not require any EIA to be conducted as the activity is not included in Schedule I. The project activity consists of pipeline changes to prevent methane venting and to use the methane as fuel in the primary reformer in the existing plant of TCL. Further TCL has already obtained necessary clearances from the State and Central Pollution Control Boards for establishment and operation for its plant Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol requires that a CDM project activity contributes to the sustainable development of the host country. Assessing the project activity’s positive and negative impacts on the local environment and on society is thus a key element for each CDM project. The objective of the project is to eliminate the off gas venting and use that off gas as a fuel. This results in fuel consumption reduction and elimination of methane venting. By this way the project activity reduces environmental impacts related to venting of off gases and fuel consumption. The project activity does not have any significant negative environmental impact at the site. The GHG emission reductions from project activity, benefits the global environment which in turn is a step towards sustainability. SECTION G. Stakeholders’ comments: G.1. Brief description of how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled: The project activity has diverted the flow of off gas from C – 03 to be used as a fuel in the primary reformer in the existing plant of TCL and is a small activity considering the plant as a whole. The project activities has no discernable negative environmental impacts, because the activities are improvement in operational practices and equipment installed are itself relatively small (not requiring major transportation or other energy inputs), and because there are no other contributions to noise, air or water pollution outside the facilities, no stakeholders were identified in particular. G.2. Summary of the comments received: Not received for the project activity.

CDM-SSC-PDD (version 02) CDM – Executive Board page 18 G.3. Report on how due account was taken of any comments received: No comments received.


Annex 1 CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY Organization: Tata Chemical Limited Street/P.O.Box: Indira Dham Building: City: District Budaun State/Region: Uttar Pradesh Postfix/ZIP: 202 521 Country: India Telephone: 05836 – 231 263 FAX: 05836 – 231 257 / 58 E-Mail: URL: http://www.tatachemicals.com/ Represented by: Mr. O P Tripathi Title: Sr Manager – TS & Projects Salutation: Mr. O P Tripathi Last Name: Middle Name: First Name: Department: Mobile: 09412295417 Direct FAX: Direct tel: Personal E-Mail: [email protected]


Annex 2 INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING

No public funding received for the project activity.


Annex 3

List of Abbreviations

CC Climate Change CDM Clean Development Mechanism CER Certified Emission Reductions CO Carbon Monoxide CO2 Carbon di-oxide CP Credit Period Cum Cubic Meter DCS Distributed Control System DOE Designated Operational Entity DPR Detailed Project Report DM De-Mineralised EB Executive Board EIA Environmental Impact Assessment GHG Green House Gas/es GJ Giga Joules GOI Government of India GoUP Government of Uttar Pradesh GWh Giga Watt hour HP High Pressure HR or hr Hour HV High Voltage IPCC Intra-governmental Panel for Climate Change KP Kyoto Protocol km kilo meter KV Kilo Volts KW Kilo Watt KWh Kilo Watt hour LP Low Pressure 1 Lakh 1,00,000 MkWh Million Kilo Watt hour MU Million units MT Metric Ton MW Mega Watt NG Natural Gas NOC No Objection Certificate


p.a. Per annum PDD Project Design Document PFD Process Flow Diagram PLF Plant Load Factor PIN Project Idea Note SSCR Specific Steam Consumption Ratio TCL Tata Chemicals Limited TJ Trillion Joules TPH Tones Per Hour UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UP Uttar Pradesh UPPCB Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board


ANNEX 4

LIST OF REFERENCES

Sr.No Particulars of the references

Kyoto Protocol / UNFCCC Related

1. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

2. Website of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC),

http://unfccc.int

3. UNFCCC Decision 17/CP.7 : Modalities and procedures for a clean development mechanism as defined in article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol.

4. UNFCCC document, Clean Development Mechanism-Project Design Document (CDM-PDD) version 01(in effect as of: August 29, 2002)

5. UNFCCC document : Annex B to attachment 3 Indicative simplified baseline and monitoring methodologies for selected small scale CDM project activity categories ver 01, January 21, 2003.

6. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Document on emission factors. IPCC-1996-Rev.

7. British Standard BS-845-1987 for Indirect Boiler Efficiency Calculations

8. Steam tables to determine enthalpy of steam

9. Phychrometric charts to determine moisture in air based on wet bulb and dry bulb temperatures.

10. National Document to refer fuel emission factor, if any.

Project Related

11. Project scheme documents and records from TCL records

12. Design data supplied by TCL

- - - - -