portfolio 2.0 full.opt
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
1/62
JAMES CONLEYSyracuse UniversitySchool of Architecture
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
2/62
171 Quail Hollow LaneEast Amherst, NY 14051
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
3/62
INDEX
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.5
3.5
2.2
2.1
3.2
3.1
3.4
3.3
1.1
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
4/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
5/62
1.0 Academic Work
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
6/62
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
HARLEM
MORNINGSIDE GYM
MANHATTANVILLE
Columbia University Expansion
Due to growing needs for medical research, Colum-bia University has undergone plans to create an ad-ditional campus expanding their current universityinto West Harlem. The property for this project wasaccumulated through the use of eminent domainand coordinated efforts of individual purchasersguided by the university.In 2008 the campus plan as design by SOM andVinioli Architects, failed to take advantage of thesites dramatic topography and the design potentialsthat a superblock can afford. This in addition to thehistorically contentious relationship between the Uni-
versity and Harlem, as seen through the 1968 pro-tests and fortress like development of ColumbiasMornigside campus, prompted the desire to de-velop an alternative design which considered thisrelationship and looked to improve upon the currentcampus plan.Inspired out of the desire to make multiple social andinformation based connections, the proposedcampus plan looks to bridge the University more intothe fabric of Upper Manhattan, and to utilize the
superblock, not a divisional tool or urban micro-cosm, but as a means to engender stronger rela-tionships to urban life and improve upon publicaccess to the waterfront and riverside park.
1.1
1.1
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
7/62
MANHATTANCOMMONS
1.1
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
8/62
1.1
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
9/62
1.1
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
10/62
N
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1 IN
2 IN
4 IN
3 IN
5 IN
6 IN
AVERAGE PRECIPITATION
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
AVERAGE RELATIVE HUMIDITY
MORNING
EVENING
AVERAGE TEMPERATURES
90F
80F
70F
60F
50F
40F
30F
20F
10F
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
AVG
DAILYHIGH
DAILYLOW
AVG LOW: 23 DEG F
AVG HIGH: 70 DEG F
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC AVG
MAX 31.4 33.3 42.5 54.9 68 76.8 81.5 79.7 71.9 59.9 47.6 36.6 57
AVG 23.7 25.1 33.8 45.3 57.6 66.7 71.2 69.6 62.1 50.9 40.4 29.7 48
MIN 16 16.9 25.1 35.7 47.2 56.5 60.9 59.4 52.2 41.9 33.2 22.7 39
ANNUAL AVERAGE
TEMPERATURE DATA
Case Study: Willard State Hospital1.2
The Willard State Hospital Administration building, designed in 1971 by Wiener Seligman is a classic exampleof post modernist design in the 1970s. The buildingas currently designed carries a heavy reliance upon me-chanical building systems such as artificial lighting, water intensive utilities, and due to l imited amounts insula-tion a forced air and radiation heating system make up for the heat loss deficit. The project was studied underour group during the advance building systems course to generate a better understanding of mechanical andstructural systems of existing buildings.After analysis of the existing structure was taken into account the projects second phase was to design modifi-cations to the existing building in order to produce greater energy efficiency and heavier reliance upon naturalsystems. The project took a wholistic approach to building design the through coupling passive building sys-tems together whenever possible to enhance material and energy efficiency. The proposed alterations alsomade sure to take into account site weather conditions, through preforming wind and sun studies to test thefeasibility of alternative energy solutions.
1.2
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
11/62
AHU 1: EXPLODED AXONFROM SOUTHWEST CORNER
AHU 2: EXPLODED AXONFROM SOUTHWEST CORNER
GROUND FLR AIR DIST PLAN - 1 / 32 = 1
SECOND FLR AIR DIST PLAN - 1 / 32 = 1
EXISTING HVAC SYSTEM
BASEMENT PLAN - 1 / 32 = 1
AHU 1 AHU 2
NORTH FACADE GLAZING AREA = 60.1%
NORTH FACADE MATERIALS
PORCELAIN STEEL ENAMEL PANELS
GLAZING
REINFORCED CONCRETE
VENTS
NORTH ELEVATION - 1 / 32 = 1
SOUTH FACADE GLAZING AREA = 17.2%
SOUTH FACADE MATERIALS
SOUTH ELEVATION - 1 / 32 = 1
PORCELAIN STEEL ENAMEL PANELS
GLAZING
REINFORCED CONCRETE
VENTS
1.2
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
12/62
GREEN ROOF SYSTEM
TRAYS
ROOT BARRIER
HDPE SUBSTRATE
VAPOR BARRIER
RIGID INSULATION
ABMS CONTROLLED VENTS
OPERABLE INNER LEAF
WINDOWS
AEROGEL IGU
ACCESS DOOR
SUPPLEMENTAL INSULATION
RADIANT FLOOR HEATING /
COOLING COILS
ACCESS GRATE
GRAVEL DRIP STRIP
PROPOSED NORTH FACADE SECTION CEXISTING NORTH FACADE 1 / 32 = 1 - 0
PROPOSED NORTH FACADE 1 / 32 = 1 - 0
BUILT UP BITUMINOUS
ROOFING OVER 2 RIGID
INSULATION ON METAL DECK
PORCELAIN ENAMEL STEEL
PANEL W/ 2 RIGID INSULATION
INTEGRATED LIGHT FIXTURE
DROP CEILING
GLAZING
HYDRONIC HEATING UNIT
CONCRETE FLOOR ON METALDECK
OPEN WEB JOISTS
CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE
WALL
CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE
SLAB
FOOTING
GRADE
EXISTING NORTH FACADE SECTION C
EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION - 1 / 32 = 1 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION - 1 / 32 = 1
PROPOSED SOUTH WALLSECTION
GREEN ROOF SYSTEM
TRAYS
ROOT BARRIER
HDPE SUBSTRATE
VAPOR BARRIER
RIGID INSULATION
ABMS CONTROLLED VENTS
OPERABLE INNER LEAF
WINDOWS
AEROGEL IGU
ACCESS DOOR
SUPPLEMENTAL INSULATION
ABMS VENTS
RADIANT FLOOR HEATING /
COOLING COILS
ACCESS GRATE
ABMS VENTS
GRAVEL DRIP STRIP
EXISTING SOUTH WALLSECTION
BUILT UP BITUMINOUS
ROOFING OVER 2 RIGIDINSULATION ON METAL
DECK
PORCELAIN ENAMEL
STEEL PANEL W/ 2 RIGID
INSULATION
DROP CEILING
GLAZING
CONCRETE FLOOR ONMETAL DECK
W14 SECTION
OPEN WEB JOISTS
GLAZING
CAST IN PLACECONCRETE WALL
CAST IN PLACECONCRETE SLAB
FOOTING
GRADE
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION
PREVAILINGWINDS
PREVAILINGWINDS
EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION
HEAT LOSS
HEAT LOSS HEAT LOSS
HEAT LOSS
1.2
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
13/62
VIEW OF PROPOSED EXTERIOR
RED AND
BLUE ELEMENTSDENOTE SECONDARY
MECHANICAL
VENTILATION SYSTEM
NOTE:
PV SHOWN IN RENDERING
WE PROPOSE A MIX
OF PV AND SHW COLLECTORS;
HOWEVER BUILDING DEMAND IS
UNKNOWN, SO THE RATIO HAS NOTBEEN ESTABLISHED. A FULL PV FIT OUT
WOULD HAVE S GENERATION CAPACITY
OF 17 kW * 365 DAYS * 4.3 SUN HOURS
* 80% DERATE = 21,000 kWh ANNUALLY
1.2
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
14/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
15/62
Hostels blur our conventional sense of privacy. They create an environment wherethe intimate act of sleeping is done amongst strangers, and vulnerability is uncer-tain.
Fueled by this concept the design project explored the gradient nature ofpublic/private space, through strategically mixing various programs together. Theclimax of this dynamism occurs when the intersection of the hostel L and com-mercial slab result in a laundry mat bar; further blurring our understanding ofprivate versus public events. The project offers a below grade performance stagewhich is easily accessible by the public (including the homeless) at all times, andincorporates themed private rooms accessible through the hostel, located belowgrade.The project additionally explored the social environment of the hostel, and the wayin which technology can exceed spatial limitations. Designed into each bed is a
camera and screen which provides access into the hostels interactive networklinking guests together. Allowing architecture to design connections in spacelessenvironment.
NYC Hostel: Public.Private Space1.3
1.3
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
16/62
1.3
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
17/62
Forth Floor: 36 Above Grade
1.3
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
18/62
4 homes |1 courtyard :3 opportunities for exchange
4 homes | 4 courtyard :8 opportunities for exchange
Privatized Housing Model:0 opportunities for exchange
6 homes | 1 courtyard :5 opportunities for exchange
6 homes | 3 courtyard :12 opportunities for exchange
Privatized Housing Model :0 opportunities for exchange
What if a housing complex could be more than just where one dwells? What i f it could leadto sense of community, an exchange of ideas, and a place for entrepreneurial activity? Whatif you could create housing which was not only environmentally sustainable, but economi-
cally sustainable How would this new condition represent itself architecturally, while borrow-ing from proven spatial arrangements of the past?The Capitalist Commune contradictorily merges luxury housing with the business incubatormodel for the development of new sustainable technologies. Using a courtyard as a meansto generate social and intellectual exchange, the housing community aspires to act simulta-neously as a neighborhood and corporation. This hybrid model stationed on a de-industrialized pier in Redhook, NY hopes to rejuvenate the local economy and providesquality housing to the district.
The Capitalist Commune1.4
1.4
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
19/62
1.4
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
20/62
1.4
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
21/62
PRIVATE SPHERE
PUBLIC SPHERE
WORK
WORK
LIVELIVE
DWELL
DAMP
DRY
1.4
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
22/62
Considering architectural issues such as Branding and Event Space, the Under Armourheadquarters makes the transition from the citizen into the athlete as powerful an experi-ence as sporting events themselves. The buildings main entrance stationed at the tip of
a triangular lot doubles as a vomitory, bringing the companys staff and customers into anarena of their own. The monumental entrance doubles as a testing ground for new prod-ucts and staging for athletic events or showcases, allowing for advertisement and sales tooccur on a whole new playing field. This grand foyer allows for not only the creation of newprogramming, but for the company to create an iconic building in downtown Boston.As Under Armour represents the pursuit of the innovation and high performance, thedesign incorporated strategies for high environmental performance. Integrating passivecooling and lighting technology through operable louvers, continual atrium, and doublefacades, the building helps to lighten mechanical loads allowing for improved environ-mental stainability, and creates efficiencies which the company strives for in their own
work.
Under Armour Headquarters1.5
1.5
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
23/62
1.5
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
24/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
25/62
Winter Summer
90
30
311
anodized aluminum sheet
rubber sheathing
ventilation portal
rigid insulation
vapor barrier
interior double glazed glass
mechanically operated ventilation
exterior double glazed glass
gypsum encase steel column
rubber seal
reflective tile
reflective tile
operable louver
1.5
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
26/62
A B C D1 E1 F1 G1 H
a
b
c
d
aa
bb
cc
36 30 30 30 30 22.5 21.5
21.5
27
31
34
15
9
200
202
34.5
137.5
140
41
33.75
33.75
33.75
33.75
25
24.25
225
44
79
48
63.5
DISPLAY
GYMNASIUM
AEROBICS
ROOM
MENSL
OCKERROOM
WOMENSLOCKERROOM
AUDITORIUM
3rd floor|scale 1/8=1
1.5
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
27/62
2nd floor
3rd floor
4th floor
5th floor
6th floor
7th floor
8th floor
ground floor
57 0
69 0
9th floor
81 0
93 0
105 0
42 0
30 0
15 0
0 0
120
120
90
30
90
30
90
60
30
90
30
90
90
30
90
30
1170 1
290
20
16
16
40
80120
r oo f 1 17 0
parking -12 0
sky light glass enclosureparapet wall
ventilation fan
operable glass louver (heat diffusion)
operable glass louver
hung ceiling
truss constructed transfer beam
steel frame construction
glass curtain wall
concrete wall
concrete encased steel column
double facade vestibule
interior glass wall
structural concrete decking
1.5
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
28/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
29/62
2.0 Design|Development
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
30/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
31/62
In accordance with R-6 land zoning, area demographics, local market salesand a desire to maximize land use and value; I am proposing that 253 Pacific St in
Brooklyn, NY becomes the home to 15 new luxury studio condominiums. At a priceof $250,000, these 360 square foot units will be in competitive standing with neighbor-ing co-ops, and better fit the needs of the young single population.
253 Pacific Street, Brooklyn NY 112012.1
Estimated Land Costs: $123.44/sq ft ($750K)Estimated Construction Cost: $250/sq ft
Estimated Market Value: $695/sq ft
R-6 Zoning_FAR: 2.43
LandEstimated Land Costs: $123.44/sq ft
Lot size: 25 X 100 (2,500 sq ft)
Developable land: 6,075 sq ft
Estimated Apt Market Value: $695/sq ft
2.1
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
32/62
1st Floor:
-325 sq ft Studio-836 sq ft 1 Bedroom+1
2nd, 3rd, 4th Floor:
-410 sq ft Studio
-836 sq ft 1 Bedroom+1
2.1
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
33/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
34/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
35/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
36/62
Typical Office Floor [3-12]
1,400 sq ft
1,450sqft
1,700sqft
2,800 sq ft2,200 sq ft
2,300 sq ft
2,450 sq ft
1 Buisness Center2 Hotel Lobby3 Hotel Desk4 Luggage Storage
5 Resturant6 Kitchen7 Hotels Kitchen8 Hotel Office9 Tractor Tralior Below10 Data Center
1
23 3
4
56
7
8
9
10
4,900 sq ft
Hotel Lobby [Floor 2]
1
Hotel Profit & Loss StatementHotel P&L Assump ons
GrossSF Available to Hotel 280,000
NetSF Available to Rooms 174,720
NetSF to Ammenity 105,280
keys 460
GrossSF per Bed 609
NetSF per Room 380
AmmenitySF per Room 229
Maximum Room Nights 167,900
ADR $285
Average Occupancy 80.0%
2.2
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
37/62
STABALIZED / NIGHTS OCC NIGHT / ROOM %
Room Income
Gross Maximum Room Revenue 47,851,500$
Occupied Room Revenue 38,281,200$ $ 582$ 822 83,220$ 74%
Department IncomeSpa,Fitness or Other 5.0% 1,914,060$ $ 41$ 11 4,161$ 4%
Food & Beverage 15.0% 5,742,180$ 384,21$ 34$ 43 $ 11%
Telephone & Other 15.0% 5,742,180$ 384,21$ 34$ 43 $ 11%
Total Gross Revenue 51,679,620$ 743,211$ 583$ 803 $ 100%
Room Expenses
Rooms 20.0% (7,656,240)$ )446,61($ )75($ )64( $ 20%
Department Expenses
Spa & Fitness 80.0% (1,531,248)$ $ )11($ )9( (3,329)$ 4%
F&B (Banquet) 80.0% (4,593,744)$ $ )43($ )72( (9,986)$ 12%
Telephone & Other 65.0% (3,732,417)$ $ )82($ )22( (8,114)$ 10%
Subtotal (17,513,649)$ $ )031($ )401( (38,073)$ 47%
Unallocated Expenses
General & Admin 8.5% (4,392,768)$ $ )33($ )62( (9,549)$ 12%
Sales & Marke ng 10.0% (5,167,962)$ )532,11($ )83($ )13( $ 14%
Repairs & Maintenance 4.0% (2,067,185)$ $ )51($ )21( (4,494)$ 6%
U li es & Services 5.0% (2,583,981)$ $ )91($ )51( (5,617)$ 7%
Subtotal (14,211,896)$ $ )601($ )58( (30,895)$ 38%
Gross Opera ng Profit 39% 19,954,076$ $ 941$ 911 43,378$
Fixed Expeneses
Property Taxes (Allocated) 4.0% (2,067,185)$ $ )51($ )21( (4,494)$ 6%
Insurance 1.0% (516,796)$ )321,1($ )4($ )3( $ 1%
Replacement Reserve 3.0% (1,550,389)$ $ )21($ )9( (3,370)$ 4%
Management Fees 3.0% (1,550,389)$ $ )21($ )9( (3,370)$ 4%
Subtotal (5,684,758)$ )853,21($ )24($ )43( $ 15%
Total Expenses (37,410,303)$ $ )972($ )322( (81,327)$ 100%
Net Opera ng Income 28% 14,269,317$ $ 601$ 58 31,020$ 2.2
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
38/62
1,900 sq ft 2,400 sq ft
864 sq ft 892 sq ft
812 sq ft
2,300 sq ft
GROSS SF NET SF LOSS SF Loss Factor
Total 160,000 144,010 15,990 9.99%
Floor Unit NET SF BEDROOMS BATHS $ PSF TOTAL
39-41 A 1,900 3 2.5 2,150$ 4,085,000$
B 2,400 3 2.5 2,150$ 5,160,000$
C 890 1 1.5 2,050$ 1,824,500$
D 920 1 1.5 2,050$ 1,886,000$E 2,600 3 3.0 2,200$ 5,720,000$
F 820 2 1.5 2,100$ 1,722,000$
SUBTOTAL 61,192,500$
42-44 A 1,900 3 2.5 2,200$ 4,180,000$
B 2,400 3 2.5 2,200$ 5,280,000$
C 890 1 1.5 2,100$ 1,869,000$
D 920 1 1.5 2,100$ 1,932,000$
E 2,600 3 3.0 2,250$ 5,850,000$
F 820 2 1.5 2,150$ 1,763,000$
SUBTOTAL 62,622,000$
45-47 A 1,900 3 2.5 2,250$ 4,275,000$B 2,400 3 2.5 2,250$ 5,400,000$
C 890 1 1.5 2,150$ 1,913,500$
D 920 1 1.5 2,150$ 1,978,000$
E 2,600 3 3.0 2,300$ 5,980,000$
F 820 2 1.5 2,200$ 1,804,000$
SUBTOTAL 64,051,500$
48-50 A 1,900 3 2.5 2,300$ 4,370,000$
B 2,400 3 2.5 2,300$ 5,520,000$
C 890 1 1.5 2,200$ 1,958,000$
D 920 1 1.5 2,200$ 2,024,000$
E 2,600 3 3.0 2,350$ 6,110,000$
F 820 2 1.5 2,250$ 1,845,000$
SUBTOTAL 65,481,000$
51-53 A 1,900 3 2.5 2,400$ 4,560,000$
B 2,400 3 2.5 2,400$ 5,760,000$
C 890 1 1.5 2,300$ 2,047,000$
D 920 1 1.5 2,300$ 2,116,000$
E 2,600 3 3.0 2,450$ 6,370,000$
F 820 2 1.5 2,350$ 1,927,000$
SUBTOTAL 68,340,000$
Gross Income 321,687,000$
Table 38 [Floor 38]
Residential [Floor 39-53]
2.2
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
39/62
Cash Flow
Development Expense
Acquisition (81,756,040)$
Hard Costs (348,581,200)$
Soft Costs (22,452,920)$Marketing Costs (13,585,000)$
Financing Costs (20,165,027)$
Total (486,540,187)$
Capitalization Income
Income From Residence 321,687,000$
Opera ng Income
HOTEL Opera ng Income 12,249,984$
OFFICE Opera ng Income 15,192,684$27,442,668$
Cap Rate 6.25%
439,082,680$
Total Income 760,769,680$
Net 274,229,493$
2.2
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
40/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
41/62
3.0 Design|Build
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
42/62
3.1Dorm Modification
By the second year of college the increased desire for independent living conflicted with the
university policy of mandatory on campus housing. This issue coupled with the accumulation
of books, technology and kitchen supplies amassed amongst the roommates, lead to the
need for greater organization and increased spatial efficiency helping to establish two inde-
pendent zones; one entertainment center, and a kitchenette.
3.1
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
43/62
KITCHEN
Living room Hallway
87
6
168
11
87
ENTERTAINMENT
3.13.1
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
44/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
45/62
15.5
9.011.1
13.7
9.210.8
30.5
18.520.8
29.6
38.9
9.4
33.5
20.6
21.3
9.0
1.7
6.5
7.5
.55.5
30.8
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.8
18.5
33.5
15.8
13.2
40.3
3.1
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
46/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
47/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
48/62
3.2
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
49/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
50/62
3.3 Transitional Space: 325 S Warren St. Syracuse, NYAs a result of Storefront for Syracuses success during the Artstrong Gallery, the buildings
owner approached the group to see if we were willing to produce a mural for a parking garage
that was having its ground floor converted into viable retail storefronts. After some delibera-
tion, we determined that the most time and cost effective solution would be through applying
vinyl adhesive to a wood substrate that could help shield construction work behind the walland help to announce the buildings transition.
3.3
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
51/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
52/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
53/62
3.3
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
54/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
55/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
56/62
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
57/62
3.4
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
58/62
3.5 Flash Park: Near West Side|Syracuse, NY
In Fall of 2010, Syracuse Universitys AIAS chapter hosted a conference entitled: Reclaiming
Architecture, which focused on the marginalization of the architectural profession and
stressed the importance for architects to expand the definitions of practice through becoming
more entrepreneurial in spirit. As a concluding event, 12 students arrived and participated in
a design build exercise which constructed a 2,000 sf park on a portion of an old building foun-dation. The park now sits in an impoverished neighborhood across from a family community
center where many of the children utilize the table, benches and grass to relax outside of the
building.
3.5
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
59/62
3.5
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
60/62
3.5
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
61/62
3.5
-
8/7/2019 portfolio 2.0 full.opt
62/62
3.4