pp slide set 13 workforce planning
TRANSCRIPT
07/04/2014 Workforce Planning 1
Workforce Planning
07/04/2014 Workforce Planning
Tricordant uses the Tricord™ organisational model to reflect the importance of aligning the organisation’s core purpose (identity) to:
2
Planning the workforce requires alignment across organisational identity,
strategy, systems and culture
Strategy
Systems Culture
ConceptVision
Strategy Goals
ObjectivesValues
SpiritEnergyCulture
TeamworkLanguage
MotivationEthos
Evaluation
Processes Systems
GovernanceInfrastructure
ProjectsPeople Structure
SkillsMeasurement
Reward
FoundationReason
Core PurposeEthic
UniquenessHistoryBrand
Leadership
Identity
• Strategy – including the workforce implications and underpinning values
• Systems – covering the operational processes and required skills and roles to deliver them
• Culture – the ways in which people will need to work together and be measured
07/04/2014 Workforce Planning
Tricordant View of Workforce Planning
Resource Management
High utilisation of staff
- Resource allocation systems
- Flexible resource management
- Performance management
Talent Management
Internal pipeline of capable staff
- Succession Planning- Career Frameworks
- Leadership Development
Workforce Planning
Sourcing of workforce for the long term
- Workforce Strategy and Plans
- Strategic capability frameworks
- Workforce modelling
Focus
Type of Support
Short Term
Medium Term
Long Term
Time Scale
1 year 3 year
07/04/2014 Workforce Planning
Workforce strategy development moves through six stages:
4
Tricordant Approach - Workforce Planning
Wor
kfor
ce S
trat
egy
Dev
elop
men
t
BaselineKnown and
historical dataProbable
Known impacts and changes
Future ScenariosModelling impact of strategy and
external context
Workforce ChallengesExtracting key workforce issues from
supply and dataOptions AnalysisModelling possible
workforce choices based on best practiceStrategy
Develop workforce strategic plan
Supply vs. Demand
Modelling
Workforce Strategy
Development
07/04/2014 Workforce Planning 5
Workforce Models vary by Time & Data Type Text
Qualitative
Short Term Long Term
Research-led Teaching Strategy
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%PUBLIC RESEARCH
PRIVATE RESEARCH
PUBLIC TEACHING
PRIVATE TEACHING
ACADEMIC ENTERPRISE
OTHER SERVICES
Research Intensive Strategy
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%PUBLIC RESEARCH
PRIVATE RESEARCH
PUBLIC TEACHING
PRIVATE TEACHING
ACADEMIC ENTERPRISE
OTHER SERVICES
Research Intensive Research Led Teaching
Professional Formation Strategy
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%PUBLIC RESEARCH
PRIVATE RESEARCH
PUBLIC TEACHING
PRIVATE TEACHING
ACADEMIC ENTERPRISE
OTHER SERVICES
Professional Formation
Knowledge Services Strategy
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%PUBLIC RESEARCH
PRIVATE RESEARCH
PUBLIC TEACHING
PRIVATE TEACHING
ACADEMIC ENTERPRISE
OTHER SERVICES
Knowledge Services
Specialist / Niche
Discipline based and internationally
recognised research with research income making up 40%-50%
of income
Discipline based teaching underpinned
by strong research capabilities, with
teaching making up 60%+ of income
Strategy based on translation of
research knowledge into business / social
application. Supplemented by
other income.
Focus on needs of employers and
individual’s professional careers
through CPD & lifelong learning(75%+ teaching)
Typically small institutions focussed on particular areas of practice e.g. creative arts, agriculture. No archetypal profile.
English Universities - Workforce Plan for all Staff (300,000+ staff)
ASSURANCE8%
INSTALL5%
PROJ ENG20%
SIGNAL DESIGN15%SYSTEMS APPS
ENG7%
SYSTEMS ENG35%
TEST5%
RESEARCH5%
ASSURANCE4%
INSTALL17%
PROJ ENG10%
SIGNAL DESIGN42%
SYSTEMS APPS ENG9%
SYSTEMS ENG6%
TEST12%
FutureMainline now Mass Transitnow
LegacyPotential mix of the future
ASSURANCE8%
INSTALL5%
PROJ ENG18%
SIGNAL DESIGN28%
SYSTEMS APPS ENG3%
SYSTEMS ENG32%
TEST6%
Work dominated by:
Key roles:
Bespoke legacy systems
Signalling DesignerSystems Applications Engineers
Building commodity solutions
Signalling DesignerSystems Applications Engs.Product Development
Bespoke complex control systems
IntegratorProject EngineeringSystems Engineering
Disruptive technology solutions
IntegratorResearcherSystems Engineering
Engineering Firm - Strategic Workforce Plan and Assessment
Design / Project Engineering Actuals vs Ideal Integrator
0
1
2
3
4Product Knowledge
Systems KnowledgeIndustry Knowledge
Customer Focus***
Effective Communication***
Engineering Safety
Safety-Quality-Environment
Installation Management
Installation Delivery
Component Testing
System Testing
Requirements Analysis & System Specification
Schema Design
Systems Thinking
Problem Option AnalysisSubcontract Management
Decision Making Engineering Process
People Management***
Planning***
Monitoring & Change Control***
Risk Management***
Commercial Awareness***
Sense Making
Innovation / Creativity
Calculated Risk Taking
Direction Setting
Act with Integrity
Display Adaptability
Demonstrate Interest in Others
Exhibit self-awareness and develop oneselfDrive for Results
Integrator Ideal Prof ile
Senior Project Eng Manager
Systems Engineering Manager
Design Performance Manager
Government Dept – Succession Planning and Talent Pools
Quantitative
Current Successors
Talent Pool
= Strong desire for career progression in next 12 months (indicated by number in brackets) = Don’t have strong desire for career progression in next 12 months
Government Dept – Analysis of Policy Professional Requirements
07/04/2014 Workforce Planning
The funding body wanted a 10-15 year high level workforce plan for both academic and support staff across the English higher education system.
6
English Universities Long Term Workforce Plan
07/04/2014 Workforce Planning 7
Future HE Workforce Framework:
Supply & Demand Implications of Trends
StructuresManagement
PeopleJobs
The imperativesfor mobility, flexibility and personalisation of employment terms
Impacts of trends in the supply of the future workforce
The importance of effective and strategic leadership of workforce development in HEIs
The changed nature of work and careers in HE and the skills required
SUPPLYDEMAND
07/04/2014 Workforce Planning 8
Stages in supply &demand analysis
Factors driving change in HE(e.g. level of public funding)
Demand for teaching, research, enterprise and other activity
Nos, types and mix of HEIs(based on strategic responses)
Future HE Workforce Demand
JOBS: required capacity, mix of skills (academic / prof. services),patterns of employment
MANAGEMENT requirement
Current HE WorkforceSupply
(PEOPLE)
Structural optionsfor workforce change
(STRUCTURE factors e.g. flexibility of career routes)
Future HE Workforce Supply
DEMAND SUPPLY
Known trends in HE workforce (PEOPLE trends - ageing, feminisation,war for talent)
07/04/2014 Workforce Planning 9
Identification of Strategic Types of Universities & their Workforce Needs
Research-led Teaching Strategy
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%PUBLIC RESEARCH
PRIVATE RESEARCH
PUBLIC TEACHING
PRIVATE TEACHING
ACADEMIC ENTERPRISE
OTHER SERVICES
Research Intensive Strategy
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%PUBLIC RESEARCH
PRIVATE RESEARCH
PUBLIC TEACHING
PRIVATE TEACHING
ACADEMIC ENTERPRISE
OTHER SERVICES
Professional Formation Strategy
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%PUBLIC RESEARCH
PRIVATE RESEARCH
PUBLIC TEACHING
PRIVATE TEACHING
ACADEMIC ENTERPRISE
OTHER SERVICES
Professional Formation
Knowledge Services Strategy
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%PUBLIC RESEARCH
PRIVATE RESEARCH
PUBLIC TEACHING
PRIVATE TEACHING
ACADEMIC ENTERPRISE
OTHER SERVICES
Knowledge Services
Specialist / Niche
Discipline based and internationally recognised research with research income making up 40%-50% of income
Discipline based teaching underpinned by strong research capabilities, with teaching making up 60%+ of income
Strategy based on translation of research knowledge into business / social application. Supplemented by other income.
Focus on needs of employers and individual’s professional careers through CPD & lifelong learning(75%+ teaching)
Typically small institutions focussed on particular areas of practice e.g. creative arts, agriculture. No archetypal profile.
Research Intensive Research Led Teaching
07/04/2014 Workforce Planning 10
Workforce Impactsfor Particular Strategic Types
of University - Identified
Workforce Planning.ppt
Publicly-funded research
(QR grants, research council
awards)
Privately-funded
research (industry/
government/ overseas)
Publicly-funded teaching (HEFCE
T funding and regulated fees)
Privately-funded teaching (contracts and unregulated fees)
Academic enterprise (consultancy,
knowledge transfers, conferences, publishing)
Others (catering,
accommodation, lettings, etc)
Importance (% of total current income)
15% 15% 30% 15% 15% 10%
Positioning* National National National International National NationalImportance (% of total future income)
10% 20% 15% 20% 25% 10%
Positioning* National International National International International NationalStrategic Direction **
Future (2020)
Current (2008)
PORTFOLIO ELEMENTS
Ensure most academic staff are research-active
Recruit senior researchers with strong industry links
Cut back on low reputation and under-recruiting subjects
Provide excellent CPD and post-grad teaching experiences
Recruit staff who are credible in practice and innovation
Knowledge ServicesArchetype Institution
Maintain existing commercial activities
07/04/2014 Workforce Planning
1. Do the three timescales and foci of workforce planning make sense?
2. Are the six stages of workforce strategy development both helpful and logical?
3. How do case studies help demonstrate and show our understanding of workforce planning?
4. What is missing from our workforce planning offer? (e.g. WP decision support / analysis tool)
11
Questions for you