pre-construction notification (pcn) form gaston... · pre-construction notification (pcn) form ......

1

Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form

A. Applicant Information

1. Processing

1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit

1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 23 33 or General Permit (GP) number:

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No

1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):

401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit

401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization

1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?

For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: Yes No

For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No

1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program.

Yes No

1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below.

Yes No

1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No

2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 203 over Stanley Creek on SR 1935.

2b. County: Gaston

2c. Nearest municipality / town: Stanley

2d. Subdivision name: not applicable

2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: B-4751

3. Owner Information

3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation

3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable

3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): not applicable

3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center

3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598

3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6103

3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785

3h. Email address: [email protected]

Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. _____________ DWQ project no. _______________ Form Version 1.4 January 2009

2

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)

4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify:

4b. Name: not applicable

4c. Business name (if applicable):

4d. Street address:

4e. City, state, zip:

4f. Telephone no.:

4g. Fax no.:

4h. Email address:

5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)

5a. Name: not applicable

5b. Business name (if applicable):

5c. Street address:

5d. City, state, zip:

5e. Telephone no.:

5f. Fax no.:

5g. Email address:

3

B. Project Information and Prior Project History

1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable

1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.347905 Longitude: - 81.46607 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)

1c. Property size: 0.72 acres

2. Surface Waters

2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed project: Stanley Creek

2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV

2c. River basin: Catawba

3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this

application: Local rural. The Catawba Lands Conservancy owns property both north and south of Bridge No. 203.

3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:

0 within construction limits; 0.2 acre within NRTR study area.

3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 245 within construction limits; 750 LF within NRTR study area.

3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge.

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing a 71-foot bridge with a 82-foot, single-span bridge on the existing alignment with an off-site detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.

4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the

Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments:

Yes No Unknown

4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? Preliminary Final

4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known):

Agency/Consultant Company: Other:

4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.

5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for

this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown

5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions.

6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No

6b. If yes, explain.

4

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory

1. Impacts Summary

1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):

Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers

Open Waters Pond Construction

2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a.

Wetland impact number –

Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)

2b. Type of impact

2c.

Type of wetland (if known)

2d. Forested

2e.

Type of jurisdiction

2f. Area of impact

(acres)

Site 1 P T Choose One Yes No

Corps DWQ

Site 2 P T Choose One Yes No

Corps DWQ

2g. Total wetland impacts X Permanent X Temporary

2h. Comments:

3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a.

Stream impact number -

Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)

3b. Type of impact

3c. Stream name

3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)?

3e. Type of

jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ –

non-404, other)

3f. Average stream width (feet)

3g. Impact length (linear feet)

Site 1 P T temporary causeway Stanley Creek PER

INT Corps DWQ 12 27

(<0.01 ac)

Site 1 P T bank stabilization Stanley Creek PER

INT Corps DWQ 12 8

(<0.01 ac)

Site 2 P T fill / stream relocation UT to Stanley Creek PER

INT Corps DWQ 3 170

Site 2 P T associated with fill UT to Stanley Creek PER

INT Corps DWQ 3 10

(<0.01 ac)

3h. Total stream and tributary impacts

178 Perm 37 Temp

(<0.01 ac)

3i. Comments: The loss of stream function from the filling of the tributary to Stanley Creek will be replaced by the proposed ditch to be constructed.

5

4. Open Water Impacts

If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.4a.

Open water impact number – Permanent (P) or

Temporary (T)

4b. Name of

waterbody (if applicable)

4c.

Type of impact

4d. Waterbody

type

4e.

Area of impact (acres)

O1 P T

O2 P T

O3 P T

O4 P T

4f. Total open water impacts X Permanent X Temporary

4g. Comments:

5. Pond or Lake Construction

If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number

5b.

Proposed use or purpose of pond

5c. Wetland Impacts (acres)

5d. Stream Impacts (feet)

5e. Upland (acres)

Flooded Filled Excavated Floode

d Filled Excavated Flooded

P1

P2

5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?

Yes No If yes, permit ID no:

5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):

5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):

5k. Method of construction:

6

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)

If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.

6a.

Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other: Catawba Randleman

6b. Buffer impact

number – Permanent (P) or

Temporary (T)

6c.

Reason for impact

6d.

Stream name

6e. Buffer mitigation required?

6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet)

6g.

Zone 2 impact (square feet)

B1 P T Yes No

B2 P T Yes No

B3 P T Yes No

6h. Total buffer impacts

6i. Comments:

7

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation

1. Avoidance and Minimization

1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.

The proposed bridge is 11 feet longer than the existing bridge; the proposed bridge will span Stanley Creek; the proposed bridge will be at approximately the same grade as the existing structure; an off site detour will be used; bank stabilization will be utilized where the proposed ditch discharges to Stanley Creek to reduce erosion and sedimentation; and 2:1 fill slopes will be used where practicable.

1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.

A temporary causeway will be placed in Stanley Creek and utilized for the removal of the pilings of the existing bridge.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State

2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?

Yes No

If no, explain: In conversations with Steve Kichefski USACE, mitigation is not required for the filling of the UT to Stanley Creek (low quality stream), as it's function will replaced by the proposed ditch.

NCDOT does not propose mitigation for the 8 lf of bank stabilization impact, as it does not require fill in the stream bed and therefore, under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, does not constitute Loss of Waters of the U.S. and is not subject to compensatory mitigation. Furthermore, the proposed bank stabilization is necessary to prevent erosion and sedimentation by preventing bank destabilization and thereby minimizing impacts to the environment.

Mitigation is required by NCDWR for stream impacts greater than 150 LF. Miitigation for 178 LF of stream impact at 1:1 ratio has been obtained from NCDMS.

2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?

Mitigation bank

Payment to in-lieu fee program

Permittee Responsible Mitigation

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank

3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable

3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity

3c. Comments:

4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program

4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes

4b. Stream mitigation requested: 178 linear feet

4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold

4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet

4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres

4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres

4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres

8

4h. Comments: Mitigation for 170 LF im stream impact at 1:1 ratio, for NCDWR.

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan

5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ

6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation?

Yes No

6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.

Reason for impact 6d.

Total impact (square feet)

Multiplier

6e. Required mitigation

(square feet)

Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)

Zone 2 1.5

6f. Total buffer mitigation required:

6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).

6h. Comments:

9

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)

1. Diffuse Flow Plan

1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?

Yes No

1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why.

Comments: If required from 1a, see attached buffer permit drawings. Yes No

2. Stormwater Management Plan

2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A

2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No

2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:

2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:

See attached permit drawings.

2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Certified Local Government DWQ Stormwater Program DWQ 401 Unit

3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review

3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? not applicable

3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply):

Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply Watershed Other:

3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached?

Yes No

4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review

4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply):

Coastal counties HQW ORW Session Law 2006-246 Other:

4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No n/a

5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review

5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No n/a

5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No n/a

10

F. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)

1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No

1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?

Yes No

1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)

Comments:

Yes No

2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?

Yes No

2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No

2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):

3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)

3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?

Yes

No

3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.

Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)

4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.

not applicable

(Version 2.01; Released December 2014)38523.2.1 TIP No.: B-4751 County(ies): Gaston Page 1 of 1

TIP Number: Date:

Phone: Phone:Email: Email:

County(ies):CAMA County?

No

Design/Future: Year: 2035 Existing: Year:

Threatened/Endangered Species? Comments:

Yes NoNo

NoDeck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the

General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)

ac.2 Lane Paved Roadway (Each lane is 10' width) with grass shoulder.

1400

Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?NRTR Stream ID:

Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):

Existing SiteProject Length (lin. miles or feet):

ac.

Surface Water Body (1): Water Supply IV (WS-IV)NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body

N/ABuffer Rules in Effect:

600

2 Lane Paved Roadway (Each lane varies in width from 8.8' to 11.2') with 6 ft. unpaved shoulder.

Waterbody Information

2015

NCDWR Stream Index No.:

38523.2.1

Impairments:Other Stream Classification:

Primary Classification:

Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)

Proposed Bridge spans Jurisdictional stream. Bank Stabilization has been provided where SW ditch discharges in to Stanley Creek.

North Carolina Department of Transportation

Highway Stormwater Program STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

FOR NCDOT PROJECTS

Project Type:

NC DOT Hydraulics Unit Address:

General Project InformationB-4751

WBS Element:

Bridge ReplacementWBS Element:NCDOT Contact:

919-707-6755

Contractor / Designer:

[email protected]

Raleigh, NC 27699

Address:

4/21/2015

GastonStanley

Willam S. Zerman

1590 Mail Service Center

River Basin(s): City/Town:

Typical Cross Section Description:

Surrounding Land Use:

General Project Narrative:(Description of Minimization of Water Quality Impacts)

No

Local Rural

Stanley Creek 11-119-3-(2)

0.079 miProject Description

Proposed Project

Catawba

Supplemental Classification:

Wetlands within Project Limits?

VICINITY MAPOFF-SITE DETOUR

JASON MOORE, PE

GASTON COUNTY

25 50 10050

25 50 10050

5 10 2010

D

T

V

=

=

=

=

=

=

600

1400

5

50

%

%

MPH

ADT

ADT

2015

2035

% *

DUAL 4%

DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY PLANS

* TTST =1%

SUB-REGIONAL TIER

FUNC CLASS=LOCAL RURAL

BEGIN T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751

-L- STA. 13+50.00

END T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751

-L- STA. 17+65.00

CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.

THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT.

BEGIN PROJECT

END PROJECT

BEGIN BRIDGE

END BRIDGE

STANLE

Y CR

EE

K

12

75

NYA K. BOAYUE, PE

MARCH 31, 2015

MARCH 15, 2016

TO MT. HOLLY

TO STANLEY

LENGTH ROADWAY T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751 = 0.063 MI

SR 1935

THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.

TOTAL LENGTH OF T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751 = 0.079 MI

-L-

SR 1935 (WILLOWSIDE DR.)

BRIDGE No. 203 OVER STANLEY CREEK ON

K

GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING & STRUCTURE.

(WILLOWSIDE DR.)

SR 1935(WILLOWSIDE DR.)

-L- STA. 15+11.70

-L- STA. 15+94.30

LENGTH STRUCTURE T.I.P.PROJECT B-4751 = 0.016 MI

0

0

0

PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)

38523.1.2 PE

38523.2.FD1 R/W, UTIL

BRZ-1935(3)

BRZ-1935(3)

PROJECT LENGTH

RIGHT OF WAY DATE:

LETTING DATE:

STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

STATE PROJ. NO. F. A. PROJ. NO. DESCRIPTION

NO.TOTALSHEETS

N.C.SHEET

1

DESIGN DATA Prepared in the Office of:DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

P.E.

SIGNATURE:

SIGNATURE:

P.E.

P.E.

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

PROJECT ENGINEER

PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER

GRAPHIC SCALES

C203673

PLANS

PROFILE (VERTICAL)

HYDRAULICS ENGINEER

ENGINEER

ROADWAY DESIGN

LOCATION:

TYPE OF WORK:

09/08/99

B-4751DIVISION OF HIGHWAYSSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

0

00

See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets

$$$$$$

SY

STIM

E$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

DG

N$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$

US

ER

NA

ME$$$$

1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610

CO

NT

RA

CT:

TIP P

ROJE

CT:

B-4751

STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN ENGINEER

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

OF TRANSPO

RT

ATIO

N

ST

A

TE

OF NORTHC

A

RO

LIN

A

WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT

SHEET 1 OF 5PERMIT DRAWING

Green Meadows

Golf Course

273

16BUS

273

27

27

275

Island

Mountain

pop. 3,248

Stanley

SR 1924

SR 1918

SR 19

35

SR 1918

SR 1934

SR 19

18

SR 1905

SR 1905

SR 19

20

SR 190

5

SR 1919

SR 1916

SR 1914

SR 19

19

SR 19

23

SR 1923

SR 1924

SR 2000

SR 192

2

SR 2000

SR 1905

SR 1951

CS

X

MAI

NLI

NE

CS

X

MAIN

LINE

SR 195

3

SR 19

21

SR 2

003

Creek

Stanley

Dutc

hm

an’s

Creek

Woodlawn

Ave.

Lowland

Dairy

Rd.

Sandy FordRd.

Sandy

Ford

Rd.

WIL

LO

WSID

E

DRIV

E

Dutchm

an’s

Creek

Stanley

Creek

NAD 83

GRAPHIC SCALE

0’ 100’100’

S SSURFACE WATER

DENOTES IMPACTS IN

R:\

Hydra

ulics\

PER

MIT

S_Environ

mental\

Dra

win

gs\

B4751_

Hyd_prm

_wet.dgn

msh

aik

h

5/2

7/2

015

SEE ENLARGEMENT


TS TSIMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

DENOTES TEMPORARY

STS

SURFACE WATERTEMP IMPACTS IN

SURFACE WATERIMPACTS IN

SURFACE WATERIMPACTS IN

SITE 1

SITE 2

(TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY)SURFACE WATER

TEMP IMPACTS IN


SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN

ENGINEER ENGINEER

4B-4751

R/W SHEET NO.8/17/99

$$$$$$

SY

STIM

E$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

DG

N$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$

US

ER

NA

ME$$$$

SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE / ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP

-L- STA. 15+00.83

BEGIN APPROACH SLAB

-L- STA. 15+11.70

BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA. 15+94.30

END BRIDGE

-L- PCC Sta. 16+22.53

22’

02

02

02

02

-L- STA. 16+05.14

END APPROACH SLAB

TYPE-III

TYPE-III

4.2

5’

4.2

5’

TYPE-III

TYPE-III

-L- PC Sta. 10+00.00-L- PC Sta. 12+08.83

-L- PT Sta. 11+15.43

-L- PCC Sta. 16+22.53

-L- PT Sta. 22+35.17

-L- PCC Sta. 19+18.53

-L-

1

2

2

3

410+00

15+00

20+00

NAD 83

AT -L- STA. 13+75 Rt.TIE TO EXISTING DITCH

( Not to Scale)

RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT

STA. 15+05.00 -L- RT.

DETAIL B

Grade

Ditch2’

GEOTEXTILE

Geotextile= 17 syType of Liner= 7 TONS,CL I Rip-Rap

5’min.

1.0’min.

SEE DETAIL BBANK STABILIZATION

-L- STA. 13+75 TO 15+00Rt.LATERAL "BASE" DITCHSEE DETAIL A

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

45.0

0’

EIP

EIP

EIP

12’

GR

AVE

L

STANLEY

CREEK

10’ B

ST

ST

AN

LE

Y C

RE

EK

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

618.47’

INV=

INV=619.88’

BL-4

DONNA K. LYMAN

RICHARD E. RANKIN, JR.CATAWBA LANDS CONSERVANCY,

a North Carolina nonprofit corporation

HUGH M. DUNCAN, JR.

HUGH M. DUNCAN, JR.

SHED

WOOD

SHED

1SFD

20’ BST

MON.

CONC.

SR 1935 WILLOWSIDE DRIVE


INV=619.79’

INV=619.58’

(2)-24" RCP

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

590

600

610

620

630

640

V = 75MPHd

V = 50MPHd

590

600

610

620

630

640

-L- SR 1935

WILLOWSIDE DR.

BEGIN GRADE

-L- STA. 13+50.00

ELEV. = 623.92’-L- STA. 17+65.00

ELEV. = 623.83’

END GRADE

BEGIN BRIDGE END BRIDGE

BM#1 ELEV. = 626.53’

-L- STA. 11+22.13

33.12’ LEFT

RR SPIKE IN 30" BEECH

PI = 14+30.00

EL = 624.02’

(+)0.1250% (-)0.3148%

VC = 160’

K = 364

PI = 17+00.00

EL = 623.17’

(+)1.0154%

VC = 130’

K = 98

-L- STA. 16+16.00-L- STA. 15+16.00

PAY ITEMSTRUCTURE

CLASS II RIP RAP

PAY ITEMSTRUCTURE

CLASS II RIP RAP

RIGHT DITCH

-L- Sta. 15+00.000

(-) 0.6800%(-) 2.8400%

(-) 0.9600%

(-) 4.2000%

BEGIN RT. DITCH GRADE

-L- Sta. 14+00.000

END RT. DITCH GRADE

El = 611.46’

El = 613.63’

DITCH LEGEND

PI =14+25.000

El = 613.46

PI =14+50.000

El = 612.75

PI =14+75.000

El = 612.51

DESIGN DISCHARGE

DESIGN FREQUENCY

BASE DISCHARGE

CFS

YRS

YRS

BASE FREQUENCY

OVERTOPPING ELEVATION

OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY

OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS

CFS

YRS

FT

FT

FT

DESIGN HW ELEVATION

BASE HW ELEVATION

BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA

FT

DATE OF SURVEY

W.S. ELEVATION

AT DATE OF SURVEY FT

= 2000

= 25

= 619.1

= 3559

= 100

= 621.26

= 4668

= 500+

= 623.3

=

= 05/28/14

= 610.2

2:1

1.5:1

1.5:1

610.20’

WSE


( Not to Scale)

2:12:1 D

B

b

LATERAL BASE DITCH

1"/Ft.

FROM -L- STA. 13+75 TO STA. 15+00 Rt.

DETAIL A

b=3.0Ft.

B=2.0Ft.

Min. D=1.0Ft.

Ground

Natural

Slope

Fill

( Not to Scale)


STA. 15+05.00 -L- RT.

DETAIL B

Grade

Ditch2’

GEOTEXTILE


5’min.

1.0’min.



F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

C

F

F

F

C

F

GRAPHIC SCALE

0’ 100’100’

S SSURFACE WATER

DENOTES IMPACTS IN

R:\

Hydra

ulics\

PER

MIT

S_Environ

mental\

Dra

win

gs\

B4751_

Hyd_prm

_wet.dgn

msh

aik

h

5/2

7/2

015

SEE ENLARGEMENT



DENOTES TEMPORARY

STS

SURFACE WATERTEMP IMPACTS IN

SURFACE WATERIMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

IMPACTS IN

SITE 1

SITE 2

(TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY)SURFACE WATER

TEMP IMPACTS IN




ENGINEER ENGINEER

4B-4751


$$$$$$

SY

STIM

E$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

DG

N$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$

US

ER

NA

ME$$$$

SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE / ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP

-L- STA. 15+00.83

BEGIN APPROACH SLAB

-L- STA. 15+11.70


END BRIDGE

-L- PCC Sta. 16+22.53

22’

02

02

02

02

-L- STA. 16+05.14

END APPROACH SLAB

TYPE-III

TYPE-III

4.2

5’

4.2

5’

TYPE-III

TYPE-III

-L- PC Sta. 10+00.00-L- PC Sta. 12+08.83

-L- PT Sta. 11+15.43

-L- PCC Sta. 16+22.53

-L- PT Sta. 22+35.17

-L- PCC Sta. 19+18.53

-L-

1

2

2

3

410+00

15+00

20+00

NAD 83


( Not to Scale)


STA. 15+05.00 -L- RT.

DETAIL B

Grade

Ditch2’

GEOTEXTILE


5’min.

1.0’min.



EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

45.0

0’

EIP

EIP

EIP

12’

GR

AVE

L

STANLEY

CREEK

10’ B

ST

ST

AN

LE

Y C

RE

EK

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

618.47’

INV=

INV=619.88’

BL-4

DONNA K. LYMAN



HUGH M. DUNCAN, JR.

HUGH M. DUNCAN, JR.

SHED

WOOD

SHED

1SFD

20’ BST

MON.

CONC.



INV=619.79’

INV=619.58’

(2)-24" RCP

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

590

600

610

620

630

640

V = 75MPHd

V = 50MPHd

590

600

610

620

630

640

-L- SR 1935

WILLOWSIDE DR.

BEGIN GRADE

-L- STA. 13+50.00

ELEV. = 623.92’-L- STA. 17+65.00

ELEV. = 623.83’

END GRADE


BM#1 ELEV. = 626.53’

-L- STA. 11+22.13

33.12’ LEFT


PI = 14+30.00

EL = 624.02’

(+)0.1250% (-)0.3148%

VC = 160’

K = 364

PI = 17+00.00

EL = 623.17’

(+)1.0154%

VC = 130’

K = 98

-L- STA. 16+16.00-L- STA. 15+16.00

PAY ITEMSTRUCTURE

CLASS II RIP RAP

PAY ITEMSTRUCTURE

CLASS II RIP RAP

RIGHT DITCH

-L- Sta. 15+00.000

(-) 0.6800%(-) 2.8400%

(-) 0.9600%

(-) 4.2000%


-L- Sta. 14+00.000

END RT. DITCH GRADE

El = 611.46’

El = 613.63’

DITCH LEGEND

PI =14+25.000

El = 613.46

PI =14+50.000

El = 612.75

PI =14+75.000

El = 612.51

DESIGN DISCHARGE

DESIGN FREQUENCY

BASE DISCHARGE

CFS

YRS

YRS

BASE FREQUENCY




CFS

YRS

FT

FT

FT

DESIGN HW ELEVATION

BASE HW ELEVATION


FT

DATE OF SURVEY

W.S. ELEVATION


= 2000

= 25

= 619.1

= 3559

= 100

= 621.26

= 4668

= 500+

= 623.3

=

= 05/28/14

= 610.2

2:1

1.5:1

1.5:1

610.20’

WSE


( Not to Scale)

2:12:1 D

B

b

LATERAL BASE DITCH

1"/Ft.

FROM -L- STA. 13+75 TO STA. 15+00 Rt.

DETAIL A

b=3.0Ft.

B=2.0Ft.

Min. D=1.0Ft.

Ground

Natural

Slope

Fill

( Not to Scale)


STA. 15+05.00 -L- RT.

DETAIL B

Grade

Ditch2’

GEOTEXTILE


5’min.

1.0’min.



610

612

612

612

612

612

612

612

612

612

612

612

614

614

614

614

614

614

614

614

614

614

614

614

614

616

616

616

616

616

616

616

616

616

616

616

616

616

616

6166

16

616

616

616

616

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

618

620

620

620

620

620

620

620

620 620

620

620

620

620

620

620620

620

620

620

620

620

620

620

620

620

620

620

620

622

622

622

622

622

622622

622

622

622

622

622

622

622

622

622

622

622

622

622

622

622

624

624

624

624

624

624

624

624

624

624

624

624

624

624

626

626

626

626

626

626

626

626

626

626

626

628

628

628

628

628

628

628

628

628

628

630

630

630

630

630

630

630

630

630

630

630

630 630

630

632

632

632

632

632

634

634

634

634

634

634

636

636

636

638

638

638

640

640

640

640

640

640

642

642

644

646

648

650

650

652

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

C

F

F

F

C

F

RE

VISIO

NS


ENGINEER ENGINEER

R/W SHEET NO.


$$$$$$

SY

STIM

E$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

DG

N$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$

US

ER

NA

ME$$$$

8/17/99


INCOMPLETE PLANSDO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION

IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

ENLARGEMENT

R:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\B-4751_Hyd_prm_wet_enlargement.dgn

mshaikh

5/27/2015

GRAPHIC SCALE

25’ 0’ 25’

B-4751


S SSURFACE WATER

DENOTES IMPACTS IN


DENOTES TEMPORARY

TS S

TEMP IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

15+00

14+00

( Not to Scale)


STA. 15+05.00 -L- RT.

DETAIL B

Grade

Ditch2’

GEOTEXTILE


5’min.

1.0’min.



SITE 1

SITE 2 (TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY)


-L-

+00.00


GATE

IRON

NAD 83

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

RE

VISIO

NS


ENGINEER ENGINEER

R/W SHEET NO.


$$$$$$

SY

STIM

E$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

DG

N$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$

US

ER

NA

ME$$$$

8/17/99


INCOMPLETE PLANSDO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION


ENLARGEMENT

R:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\B-4751_Hyd_prm_wet_enlargement.dgn

mshaikh

5/27/2015

GRAPHIC SCALE

25’ 0’ 25’

B-4751


S SSURFACE WATER

DENOTES IMPACTS IN


DENOTES TEMPORARY

TS S


15+00

14+00

( Not to Scale)


STA. 15+05.00 -L- RT.

DETAIL B

Grade

Ditch2’

GEOTEXTILE


5’min.

1.0’min.



SITE 1

SITE 2 (TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY)


-L-

+00.00


GATE

IRON

610 6

12

612

614

614

614

616

616

616

616

618

618

618

618

620 620

620

620

622

622

622

624

624

624

630

NAD 83

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural

Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts StreamNo. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design

(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)1 15+00 TO 15+05-L-RT STREAMBANK 8 STABILIZATION 1 15+55 TO 15+69 -L- TEMPORARY < 0.01 27 CAUSEWAY

2 13+40 TO 15+02 -L- RT STREAM IMPACT 0.01 < 0.01 170 10

TOTALS*: 0.01 < 0.01 178 37 0

*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts

NOTES:

Revised 2013 10 24 SHEET 1 OF 1

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARYWETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

GASTON COUNTYB-4751

WBS 38523.1.2

NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

4/01/2015

VICINITY M APOFF-SITE DETOUR

JASON MOORE, PE

GASTON COUNTY

25 50 10050

25 50 10050

5 10 2010

D

T

V

=

=

=

=

=

=

600

1400

5

50

%

%

MPH

ADT

ADT

2015

2035

% *

DUAL 4%


* TTST = 1%

SUB-REGIONAL TIER

FUNC CLASS= LOCAL RURAL


-L- STA. 13+ 50.00

END T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751

-L- STA. 17+ 65.00

CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.

THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT.

BEGIN PROJECT

END PROJECT

BEGIN BRIDGE

END BRIDGE

ST

ANLEY

CREE

K

12

75

NYA K. BOAYUE, PE

MARCH 31, 2015

MARCH 15, 2016

TO M T. HOLLY

TO STANLEY

LENGTH ROADW AY T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751 = 0.063 MI

SR 1935

THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.

TOTAL LENGTH OF T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751 = 0.079 MI

-L-

SR 1935 (W ILLOW SIDE DR.)

BRIDGE No. 203 OVER STANLEY CREEK ON

K

GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING & STRUCTURE.

(W ILLOW SIDE DR.)

SR 1935(W ILLOW SIDE DR.)

-L- STA. 15+ 11.70

-L- STA. 15+ 94.30

LENGTH STRUCTURE T.I.P.PROJECT B-4751 = 0.016 MI

0

0

0

PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)

38523.1.2 PE

38523.2.FD1 R/W, UTIL

BRZ-1935(3)

BRZ-1935(3)

PROJECT LENGTH

RIGHT OF W AY DATE:

LETTING DATE:

STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

STATE PROJ. NO. F. A. PROJ. NO. DESCRIPTION

NO.TOTALSHEETS

N.C.SHEET

1

DESIGN DATA Prepared in the Office of:DIVISION OF HIGHW AYS

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

P.E.

SIGNATURE:

SIGNATURE:

P.E.

P.E.

DIVISION OF HIGHW AYS

2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

PROJECT ENGINEER

PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER

GRAPHIC SCALES

C203673

PLANS

PROFILE (VERTICAL)

HYDRAULICS ENGINEER

ENGINEER

ROADW AY DESIGN

LOCATION:

TYPE OF W ORK:

09/08/99

B-4751DIVISION OF HIGHWAYSSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

0

00

See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets

18-A

UG

-2015 0

8:4

9R

:\R

oadw

ay\P

roj\

B4751_R

dy_ts

h.d

gn

$$$$U

SE

RN

AM

E$$$$

1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh N C, 27610

CO

NT

RA

CT

:T

IP P

RO

JE

CT

:B-4

751

STATE HIGHW AY DESIGN ENGINEER

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

OF TRA NSPO

RT

ATIO

N

ST

A

TE

OF NORTHC

A

RO

LIN

A

Green Meadows

Golf Course

273

16BUS

273

27

27

275

Island

M ountain

pop. 3,248

Stanley

CS

X

MAIN

LIN

E

CS

X

MAIN

LINE

Creek

Stanley

Dutchman’s

Creek

Dutchm

an’s

Creek

Stanley

Creek

NAD 83

SR 1924

SR 1918

SR 1935

SR 1918

SR 1934

SR 1918

SR 1905

SR 1905

SR 1920

SR 19

05

SR 19

19

SR 1916

SR 1914

SR 1919

SR 1923

SR 1923

SR 1924

SR 2000

SR 19

22

SR 2000

SR 1905

SR 1951

SR 195

3

SR 1921

SR 2

003

Woodlawn

Ave.

Lowla

nd

Dairy

Rd

.

Sandy FordRd.

Sandy

Ford

Rd.

WIL

LO

WSID

E

DRIV

E

ENGINEER


1-AB-4751

18

-AU

G-2

01

5 0

8:4

9R

:\R

oadw

ay\P

roj\

B4751_R

dy_ts

h.d

gn

$$$$U

SE

RN

AM

E$$$$

8/17/99

ROADW AY DESIGN

CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS

ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY MARKERS ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PLACED BY OTHERS.

RIGHT-OF-WAY MARKERS:

ANY RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY OTHERS.

PROGRESS

UTILITY OWNERS ON THIS PROJECT ARE AT&T AND DUKE ENERGY

UTILITIES:

APPROACHING A BRIDGE.

SECTION PRIOR TO SETTING OF THE SLOPE STAKES FOR THE EMBANKMENT OR EXCAVATION

THE ENGINEER SHALL CHECK THE STRUCTURE END BENT PLANS, DETAILS, AND CROSS-

END BENTS:

MAKE HIS OWN INVESTIGATION AS TO THE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS.

NO SUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD

SUBSURFACE PLANS:

WITH THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO ORDERING GUARDRAIL MATERIAL.

CONSTRUCTION AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD CONSULT

THE GUARDRAIL LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS MAY BE ADJUSTED DURING

GUARDRAIL:

SECTIONS.

SUPERELEVATION IS TO BE REVOLVED ABOUT THE GRADE POINTS SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL

STD. NO. 225.04 USING THE RATE OF SUPERELEVATION AND RUNOFF SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

ALL CURVES ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE SUPERELEVATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH

SUPERELEVATION:

METHOD II.

CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY

CLEARING:

ENGINEER IN ORDER TO SECURE A PROPER TIE-IN.

MAY BE ADJUSTED AT THEIR BEGINNING AND ENDING AND AT STRUCTURES AS DIRECTED BY THE

FUTURE SURFACING AT GRADE POINTS SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL SECTIONS. GRADE LINES

THE GRADE LINES SHOWN DENOTE THE FINISHED ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED OR

GRADING:

REVISED: 10-31-2014

EFFECTIVE: 01-17-2012

GENERAL NOTES: 2012 SPECIFICATIONS

876.02 Guide for Rip Rap at Pipe Outlets

862.03 Structure Anchor Units

862.02 Guardrail Installation

862.01 Guardrail Placement

846.03 Funnel Drain Installation in Shoulder Berm Gutter

846.01 Concrete Curb, Gutter and Curb & Gutter

840.29 Frames and Narrow Slot Flat Grates

840.28 Brick Grated Drop Inlet Type ’D’ - 12" thru 36" Pipe

840.19 Concrete Grated Drop Inlet Type ’D’ - 12" thru 36" Pipe

840.00 Concrete Base Pad for Drainage Structures

DIVISION 8 - INCIDENTALS

654.01 Pavement Repairs

DIVISION 6 - ASPHALT BASES AND PAVEMENTS

422.11 Reinforced Bridge Approach Fills - Sub Regional Tier

DIVISION 4 - MAJOR STRUCTURES

300.01 Method of Pipe Installation

DIVISION 3 - PIPE CULVERTS

225.04 Method of Obtaining Superelevation - Two Lane Pavement

200.02 Method of Clearing - Method II

DIVISION 2 - EARTHWORK

STD.NO. TITLE

are considered a part of these plans:

Dated January, 2012 are applicable to this project and by reference hereby

Highway Design Branch - N. C. Department of Transportation - Raleigh, N. C.,

The following Roadway Standards as appear in "Roadway Standard Drawings"

2012 ROADWAY ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWINGS

REV. 10-30-2012

EFF. 01-17-2012

S-1 THRU S- STRUCTURE PLANS

X-2 THRU X-8 CROSS-SECTIONS

X-1 CROSS-SECTION SUMMARY SHEET

UO-1 THRU UO- UTILITIES BY OTHERS PLANS

UC-1 THRU UC- UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION PLANS

SIGN-1 THRU SIGN- SIGNING PLANS

RF-1 THRU RF- REFORESTATION PLANS

EC-1 THRU EC- EROSION CONTROL PLANS

PMP-1 THRU PMP- PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS

TMP-1 THRU TMP-3 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS

4 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET

3D-1 DRAINAGE SUMMARIES

GUARDRAIL SUMMARY

EARTHWORK, SHOULDER BERM GUTTER AND

3B-1 THRU 3B- PAVEMENT REMOVAL SUMMARY, SUMMARY OF

2 PAVEMENT SCHEDULE AND TYPICAL SECTIONS

1C-1 THRU 1C- SURVEY CONTROL SHEETS

1B CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS

STANDARD DRAWINGS

1A INDEX OF SHEETS, GENERAL NOTES, AND

1 TITLE SHEET

SHEET NUMBER SHEET

INDEX OF SHEETS

Existing Edge of Pavement

Existing Curb

Proposed Slope Stakes Cut

Proposed Slope Stakes Fill

Existing Metal Guardrail

Existing Cable Guiderail

Proposed Guardrail

Equality Symbol

Pavement Removal

Baseline Control Point

RIGHT OF W AY:

Existing Right of W ay Marker

Existing Right of W ay Line

h

Existing Control of Access

Proposed Control of Access

Proposed Right of W ay Line

C

F

Existing Easement Line

Proposed Temporary Construction Easement

Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement

Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement

Proposed Permanent Utility Easement

HYDROLOGY:

Stream or Body of W ater

Hydro, Pool or Reservoir

Flow Arrow

Disappearing Stream

Spring

;

z

v

W

KProposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch

False Sump

Proposed Cable Guiderail

MAJOR:

Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert

Bridge Wing W all, Head W all and End W all

MINOR:

Head and End W all

Pipe Culvert

Footbridge

Paved Ditch Gutter

UTILITIES:

ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:

Existing Power Pole

Proposed Power Pole

P

U/G Power Cable Hand Hole

Power Manhole

Power Line Tower

Power Transformer

Existing Joint Use Pole

Proposed Joint Use Pole

Existing Telephone Pole

Proposed Telephone Pole

Telephone Manhole

Telephone Booth

Telephone Pedestal

U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole

R

}

T

p

Q

l

e

]

/

b

H-Frame Pole O O

POW ER:

TELEPHONE:

Telephone Cell Tower

Recorded U/G Power Line

Recorded U/G Telephone Cable

Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*)

Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit

Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*)

Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable

W ATER:

W ater Manhole

W ater Meter

W ater Valve

W ater Hydrant

Recorded U/G W ater Line

4

I

H

a

TV:

TV Satellite Dish

TV Pedestal

TV Tower

U/G TV Cable Hand Hole

Recorded U/G TV Cable

Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable

Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*)

r

|

I]

GAS:

Gas Valve

Gas Meter

Recorded U/G Gas Line

n

c

SANITARY SEW ER:

Sanitary Sewer Manhole

Sanitary Sewer Cleanout

U/G Sanitary Sewer Line

Recorded SS Forced Main Line

Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*)

d

o

A/G Water

Above Ground Gas LineA/G Gas

Above Ground W ater Line

Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A/G Sanitary Sewer

MISCELLANEOUS:

Utility Pole OF

S3

Utility Pole with Base

Utility Located Object

Utility Traffic Signal Box

Utility Unknown U/G Line

?

CONC

CONC WW

v

vDrainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB

Storm Sewer

Storm Sewer Manhole m

U/G Tank; W ater, Gas, Oil

A/G Tank; W ater, Gas, Oil

BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY:

State Line

County Line

Township Line

City Line

Reservation Line

Property Line

Existing Iron Pin

Property Corner

Property Monument

Existing Fence Line

Proposed W oven Wire Fence

Proposed Chain Link Fence

Proposed Barbed Wire Fence

g

F

123

Existing W etland Boundary

Proposed W etland Boundary

Existing Endangered Animal Boundary

Existing Endangered Plant Boundary

BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:

Area Outline

Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap

Church

School

Dam

Sign

Small Mine

W ell

V

M

WW

S

x

Foundation

S

Building

y

y

VEGETATION:

Single Tree X

Y

Vineyard

Single Shrub

Hedge

W oods Line

Orchard

Vineyard

RAILROADS:

Standard Gauge

RR Signal Milepost

Switch

RR Abandoned

RR Dismantled

S

FLOW

Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*)

Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*)

Designated U/G W ater Line (S.U.E.*)

Designated U/G TV Cable (S.U.E.*)

Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*)

U/G Test Hole (S.U.E.*)

*S.U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering

WLB

EIP

B

ECM

CONC HW

CB

CSX TRANSPORTATION

MILEPOST 35

SWITCH

Cemetery

EXISTING STRUCTURES:

Parcel / Sequence Number

E

AATUR

End of Information E.O.I.

Note: Not to ScaleSHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

1-BB-4751

Abandoned According to Utility Records

WLB

EAB

EPB

RW

RW

RW

CA

E

TDE

PDE

PUE

S

P

P

T

T

TC

TC

T FO

T FO

W

W

TV

TV

TV FO

TV FO

G

G

SS

FSS

FSS

?UTL

Jurisdictional Stream JS

12

/0

5/1

1

Buffer Zone 1

Buffer Zone 2

BZ 1

BZ 2

W etland

Proposed Permanent Easement with

Iron Pin and Cap Marker

Proposed Temporary Utility Easement TUE

Iron Pin and Cap Marker

Proposed Right of W ay Line with

DUEProposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement

AUEProposed Aerial Utility Easement

CRProposed Curb Ramp

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINADIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS

Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.

Geoenvironmental Boring

UST

Known Soil Contamination: Area or Site

Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site

Concrete or Granite R/W Marker

Proposed Right of W ay Line with

CA Concrete C/A Marker

Proposed Control of Access Line with

LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATES

BEG STATE PROJECT 38523.1.1

-L- STA. 13+ 50.00

N = 587640.9329

E = 1389882.2672

END STATE PROJECT 38523.1.1

-L- STA. 17+ 65.00


N = 587986.3893

E = 1389652.7400

NAD 83

NC GRID

CREEKSTANLEY

SR 1918

TO SANDY FORD

RD.

N = 587417.8658

E = 1390062.7619


NCDOT BASELINE M ONUM ENT (BL-4)

N = 587951.7750

E = 1389658.9510


NCDOT GPS M ONUM ENT (B4751-1)

N = 588326.3260

E = 1389514.0560


NCDOT GPS M ONUM ENT (B4751-3)

NOTES:

INFORM ATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.

SITE CALIBRATION INFORM ATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT. IF FURTHER

THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOW S:

HTTP://W W W.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US/PRECONSTRUCT/HIGHW AY/LOCATION/PROJECT/

PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT:

1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING

B4751_LS_CONTROL.TXT

INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL M ONUM ENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROLBY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.

PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM.

NETW ORK ESTABLISHED FROM NGS ONLINE POSITIONING SERVICE (OPUS)

DATUM DESCRIPTIONTHE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT

IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY

NCGS FOR MONUMENT "B4751-1"

NORTHING: 588326.326(ft) EASTING: 1389514.056(ft)

ELEVATION: 629.44(ft)

THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT

(GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.99938118

THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND

LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM

"B4751-1" TO -L- STATION 13+50.00 IS

ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES

VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88

BL-4

BM-1

-L-

W ILLOW SIDE DRIVESR 4751

WILLOW

SIDE DRIVE

SR 4751

-L-

SR 1923

TO W OODLAW N AVE.

B4751-1

B4751-3

****************************************


L STATION 11+22.13 33’ LEFT

N 587437 E 1389989

BM1 ELEVATION = 626.53

****************************************

GPS1 B4751-1 588326.3260 1389514.0560 629.44 21+30.14 18.21 LT

GPS3 B4751-3 587951.7750 1389658.9510 622.80 17+31.86 11.38 LT

4 BL-4 587417.8658 1390062.7619 623.93 10+63.86 16.02 RT

------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------

POINT DESC. NORTH EAST ELEVATION L STATION OFFSET

BL

778.03’

S 28° 14’45.11" E

S 28°14’45.11" E 778.03’’

ELEV.= 626.53’

FROM L STA 11+ 22.13 33’ LEFT

BM #1


6/2/99

18

-AU

G-2

01

5 0

8:4

9R

:\R

oad

way

\Pro

j\B

47

51

_L

S_

1c-1

.dg

n$

$$

$U

SE

RN

AM

E$

$$

$

Location and Surveys

NOTE: DRAW ING NOT TO SCALE

SURVEY CONTROL SHEET B-4751

WITH NAD 83 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF

B-4751 1C-1

24" R

CP

SITE CALIBRATION INFORM ATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT. IF FURTHER

HTTP://W WW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US/PRECONSTRUCT/HIGHW AY/LOCATION/PROJECT/

1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING

INFORM ATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.

INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL

BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.

PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM.

NETWORK ESTABLISHED FROM NGS ONLINE POSITIONING SERVICE (OPUS)

B4751_LS_CONTROL.TXT

NOTES:

THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOW S:

PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT:

SURVEY CONTROL SHEET B-4751

L Permanent Easement (IRON PIN AND CAP)

ALIGN STATION OFFSET NORTH EASTL 13+75.00 30.00 587678.6613 1389892.2705

L 14+00.00 55.00 587713.4381 1389898.2985

L 15+00.00 65.00 587800.7148 1389849.4421

L 15+35.00 30.00 587809.4828 1389800.8229

L 15+35.00 45.00 587817.9978 1389813.1717

L

TYPE STATION NORTH EASTPC 10+00.00 587355.5484 1390084.8024

PT 11+15.43 587450.8934 1390019.7734

PC 12+08.83 587526.3774 1389964.7639

PCC 16+22.53 587864.6854 1389726.6899

PCC 19+18.53 588125.1825 1389587.2733

PT 22+35.17 588433.5367 1389523.4290

DATUM DESCRIPTION

THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT

IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY

NCGS FOR MONUMENT "B4751-1"

NORTHING: 588326.326(ft) EASTING: 1389514.056(ft)

ELEVATION: 629.44(ft)

THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT

(GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.99938118

THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND

LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM

ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES

VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88

"B4751-1" TO -L- STATION 13+50.00 IS

S 28° 14’45.11" E 778.03’’

WITH NAD 83 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF

6/2/99


Location and SurveysENGLISH

$$$$U

SE

RN

AM

E$$$$

R:\

Roadw

ay\P

roj\

B4751_L

S_1c-2.d

gn

18

-AU

G-2

01

5 0

8:4

9

(DESIGN ALIGNM ENTS)L ROW (IRON PIN AND CAP)

ALIGN STATION OFFSET NORTH EASTL 13+00.00 30.00 587617.7441 1389935.7114

L 13+00.00 22.17 587613.1777 1389929.3484

L 16+22.53 -30.00 587847.8286 1389701.8736

L 18+00.00 23.12 588027.8676 1389657.0991

L 18+00.00 30.00 588030.9850 1389663.2294

L

L

L

13+00.00

13+00.00

-30.00 587582.7614 1389886.9650

-22.83 587586.9400 1389892.7876

L 18+00.00 -21.88 588007.4692 1389616.9866

L 18+00.00 -30.00 588003.7879 1389609.7474

16+22.53 30.00 587881.5421 1389751.5063

(ROW M ARKERS)

(PERM ANENT EASEM ENTS)

(PRELIM INARY)

B-4751 1C-2

0.02 0.02

CL

GRADE

POINT

GRADE TO THIS LINE

CL

GRADE

POINT

0.02 0.02

-L- STA. 15+ 11.70 TO 15+ 94.30

DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTIONDO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY PLANS


ROADW AY DESIGNENGINEER ENGINEER

2B-4751PAVEMENT DESIGN

6/2/99

18

-AU

G-2

01

5 0

8:4

9R

:\R

oadw

ay\P

roj\

B4751_R

dy_ty

p.d

gn

$$$$U

SE

RN

AM

E$$$$

C1

E18"

USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1

TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1

TYPICAL SECTION ON STRUCTURE

15’-3"15’-3"

-L- (SR 1935)

*PAVE TO FACE OF GUARDRAIL AS

SHOW N ON SHEET 4.

6’

9’w/GR

0.08

T

VAR 4:1 TO 2:1

6’8’

0.08

4:1

T

2:1

11 BOX BEAM UNITS @ 3’ EA = 33.00’

9’

0.08

T

FDPS

VAR 4:1 TO 2:1

VAR. 0’ TO 5.375’

9’

0.08

T

FDPS

VAR. 0’ TO 5.375’

2:1

E1

C1

E1

C1

E2

TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1A

TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1B

USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1

-L- STA. 14+ 03.75 TO 15+ 07.89 LT.

USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1B

-L- STA. 16+ 15.00 TO 16+ 65.00 LT.

-L- STA. 16+ 65.00 TO 17+ 19.62 LT.

-L- STA. 14+ 29.02 TO 14+ 90.11 RT.

-L- STA. 15+ 98.00 TO 17+ 02.15 RT.

GRADE TO THIS LINE

GRADE TO THIS LINE

IN CONJUNCTION WITH T.S. # 1

IN CONJUNCTION WITH T.S. # 1

**R

VAR. 8.83’ TO 11’ VAR. 9.02’ TO 11.23’

-L- STA. 16+ 02.00 TO 16+ 65.00 RT.

-L- STA. 13+ 50.00 TO BEG. BRIDGE 15+ 11.70

-L- STA. END BRIDGE 15+ 94.30 TO 17+ 65.00

LONG CHORD

*SEE STRUCTURE PLANS DIMENSIONS

*SURFACEW EARINGASPHALT

FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN

NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.

AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 137.5 LBS. PER SQ. YD. IN EACH OF TWO

LAYERS.C1

PROP. APPROX. 2� " ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A,

AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 627 LBS. PER SQ. YD.

PROP. APPROX. 5� " ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.0B,E1

PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.0B,

AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO

THAN 5� " IN DEPTH.

BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATERE2

EXISTING PAVEMENT.U

EARTH MATERIAL.T

P A V E M E N T S C H E D U L E

R CONCRETE SHOULDER BERM GUTTER.

15" RCP-III

15" RCP-III

Slope

Fill

Grade

Ditch2’

GEOTEXTILE

-L- STA. 13+ 75 TO 15+ 00Rt.LATERAL "BASE" DITCHSEE DETAIL A



HYDRAULICSROADW AY DESIGN

ENGINEER ENGINEER

4B-4751


18

-AU

G-2

01

5 0

8:4

9R

:\R

oad

way

\Pro

j\B

47

51

_R

dy

_p

sh

_4

.dg

n$$$$U

SE

RN

AM

E$$$$

SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE / ROADW AY RELATIONSHIP

-L- STA. 15+00.83

BEGIN APPROACH SLAB

-L- STA. 15+11.70


END BRIDGE

-L- PCC Sta. 16+22.53

22’

02

02

02

02

-L- STA. 16+05.14

END APPROACH SLAB

TYPE-III

TYPE-III

4.2

5’

4.2

5’

TYPE-III

TYPE-III

PI Sta 14+15.70

D

L = 413.70’

T = 206.87’

R = 12,500.00’

PI Sta 17+71.08

D

L = 296.00’

T = 148.55’

R = 1,406.00’

PI Sta 10+57.73

D

L = 115.43’

T = 57.73’

R = 1,850.00’

PI Sta 20+78.63

D

L = 316.64’

T = 160.09’

R = 870.00’

02


-L- STA. 13+ 50.00 END T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751

-L- STA. 17+ 65.00

-L- PC Sta. 10+00.00-L- PC Sta. 12+08.83

-L- PT Sta. 11+15.43

-L- PCC Sta. 16+22.53

-L- PT Sta. 22+35.17

-L- PCC Sta. 19+18.53

-L-

00

01

02

25’ INC

TYP.

-L-

1

2

2

3

4

22’

22’

TL-3

TL-3TL-3

TL-3

60’

SE = SEE PLANS

02

+00.00

04

03

02

LT & RT

50’ TRANS.

+15.00

EX. S

E

+75.0

0

EX

. S

E

LT & RT

50’ TRANS.

8:1

8:1

8:1

8:1

25’ INC

+40.00

+22.53

+22.53

+22.53

+22.53

10+00

15+

00

20+00

-L- STA. 15+00.83

BEGIN APPROACH SLAP

-L- STA. 16+05.14

BEGIN APPROACH SLAB

-L- STA. 15+94.30

END BRIDGE

-L- STA. 16+02 TO 16+65 LT.

PROP, SHOULDER BERM GUTTER

REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE

-L- STA. 15+11.70

BEGIN BRIDGE

+00.00

+00.00& 30.00’

EXIST. R/W

60.00’

+50.00

30.00’+50.00

40.00’

40.00’

& 30.00’

EXIST. R/W

+00.00

+35.00+00.00

70.00’

+50.00

30.00’ 45.00’

30.00’ &

30.00’

45.00’

+00.00

& 30.00’

EXIST. R/W

+25.00

40.00’TO 16+65 LT.

-L- STA. 16+15

BERM GUTTER

PROP, SHOULDER

PAY ITEM

STRUCTURE

RIP RAP

CLASS II

30.00’

SE = SEE PLANS

PL COR.

EXIST. R/W

30.00’

PL

0401

0402

0404

0405

0400

0403

15" RCP-III

15" RCP-III

2GI, TYPE D

2GI, TYPE D

2GI, TYPE D

2GI, TYPE D

GEOTEXTILE1 TON 5 S.Y. CL B RIP RAP


AT -L- STA. 13+ 75 Rt.TIE TO EXISTING DITCH

( Not to Scale)

2:12:1 D

B

b

LATERAL BASE DITCH

1"/Ft.

FROM -L- STA. 13+ 75 TO STA. 15+ 00 Rt.

DETAIL A

b= 3.0Ft.

B= 2.0Ft.

Min. D= 1.0Ft.

Ground

Natural

( Not to Scale)


STA. 15+ 05.00 -L- RT.

DETAIL B


5’min.

1.0’min.

T

TT

T

N 62°4

4’02"

W

116.4

5’

N 40°11’08" W155.20’

N 77°2

9’0

6"

W

44.3

5’

N 51°45’0

7" W134.11

’

N 81°00’24"

W

231.80’

N 23°10’25" E

302.98’

N 74°0

8’4

3"

W

552.8

3’

N 15°20’12" E

53.76’

N 54°03’4

7" W

28.51’

S 54°03’4

7" E

125.81’

S 15°13’30" W

110.32’ (R/

W-EIP)

106.44’ (E

IP-EIP)

N 75°3

0’3

0"

W

179.8

8’

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

45.0

0’

EIP

EIP

EIP

12’ GRAVEL

WOODEN PILINGS

WALLS, AND 12" ROUND

W/BST. DECK,TIMBER END

WOODEN BRIDGE

BRIDGE #203

STANLEY

CREEK

10’ B

ST

50 PR

50 PR

50 PR50 PR

50 PR

SER

VIC

E

STANLE

Y CREE

K

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

618.47’

INV=

INV=619.88’

BL-4

DONNA K. LYMAN

DB 1936 PG 944

DB 2302 PG 625



DB 4319 PG 916

DB 4186 PG 900

HUGH M. DUNCAN, JR.

DB 4186 PG 900

HUGH M. DUNCAN, JR.

GATE

MTL

SHED

WOOD

SHED

1SFD

GATE

IRON

COLUMNS

ROCK

18"X18"

SEAT ELEV.=621.18

SEAT ELEV.=621.21

ELEV=642.72’

LOW LINE

B4751-1

ELEV=651.40’

LOW LINE

ELEV=639.55’

LOW LINE

20’ BST

B4751-3

MON.

CONC.

W/ CATV

W/ CATV

W/ CATV

W/ CATV

W/ CATV

(WASHED OUT)50 PR

ABANDONED

AT&T

AT&T

Copper, OVERHEAD

AT&T Corp., 100 PR,


S 75°54’45"

W707.39’


72.84’+28.58

72.94’

+28.58

34.14’

+61.35

INV=619.79’

INV=619.58’

(2)-24" RCP

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

590

600

610

620

630

640

V = 75MPHd

V = 50MPHd

590

600

610

620

630

640

-L- SR 1935

W ILLOW SIDE DR.

BEGIN GRADE

-L- STA. 13+ 50.00

ELEV. = 623.92’-L- STA. 17+ 65.00

ELEV. = 623.83’

END GRADE


BM #1 ELEV. = 626.53’

-L- STA. 11+ 22.13

33.12’ LEFT


PI = 14+30.00

EL = 624.02’

(+)0.1250% (-)0.3148%

VC = 160’

K = 364

PI = 17+00.00

EL = 623.17’

(+)1.0154%

VC = 130’

K = 98

-L- STA. 16+ 16.00-L- STA. 15+ 16.00

PAY ITEM

STRUCTURE

CLASS II RIP RAP

PAY ITEMSTRUCTURE

CLASS II RIP RAP

RIGHT DITCH

-L- Sta. 15+00.000

(-) 0.6800%(-) 2.8400%

(-) 0.9600%

(-) 4.2000%


-L- Sta. 14+00.000

END RT. DITCH GRADE

El = 611.46’

El = 613.63’

DITCH LEGEND

PI =14+25.000

El = 613.46

PI =14+50.000

El = 612.75

PI =14+75.000

El = 612.51

DESIGN DISCHARGE

DESIGN FREQUENCY

BASE DISCHARGE

CFS

YRS

YRS

BASE FREQUENCY




CFS

YRS

FT

FT

FT

DESIGN HW ELEVATION

BASE HW ELEVATION


FT

DATE OF SURVEY

W.S. ELEVATION


= 2000

= 25

= 619.1

= 3559

= 100

= 621.26

= 4668

= 500+

= 623.3

=

= 05/28/14

= 610.2

2:1

1.5:1

1.5:1

610.20’

W SE

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

C

F

F

F

C

F

NAD 83

15" RCP-III

15" RCP-III

Slope

Fill

Grade

Ditch2’

GEOTEXTILE

-L- STA. 13+ 75 TO 15+ 00Rt.LATERAL "BASE" DITCHSEE DETAIL A



HYDRAULICSROADW AY DESIGN

ENGINEER ENGINEER

4B-4751


18

-AU

G-2

01

5 0

8:4

9R

:\R

oad

way

\Pro

j\B

47

51

_R

dy

_p

sh

_4

.dg

n$$$$U

SE

RN

AM

E$$$$

SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE / ROADW AY RELATIONSHIP

-L- STA. 15+00.83

BEGIN APPROACH SLAB

-L- STA. 15+11.70


END BRIDGE

-L- PCC Sta. 16+22.53

22’

02

02

02

02

-L- STA. 16+05.14

END APPROACH SLAB

TYPE-III

TYPE-III

4.2

5’

4.2

5’

TYPE-III

TYPE-III

PI Sta 14+15.70

D

L = 413.70’

T = 206.87’

R = 12,500.00’

PI Sta 17+71.08

D

L = 296.00’

T = 148.55’

R = 1,406.00’

PI Sta 10+57.73

D

L = 115.43’

T = 57.73’

R = 1,850.00’

PI Sta 20+78.63

D

L = 316.64’

T = 160.09’

R = 870.00’

02


-L- STA. 13+ 50.00 END T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751

-L- STA. 17+ 65.00

-L- PC Sta. 10+00.00-L- PC Sta. 12+08.83

-L- PT Sta. 11+15.43

-L- PCC Sta. 16+22.53

-L- PT Sta. 22+35.17

-L- PCC Sta. 19+18.53

-L-

00

01

02

25’ INC

TYP.

-L-

1

2

2

3

4

22’

22’

TL-3

TL-3TL-3

TL-3

60’

SE = SEE PLANS

02

+00.00

04

03

02

LT & RT

50’ TRANS.

+15.00

EX. S

E

+75.0

0

EX

. S

E

LT & RT

50’ TRANS.

8:1

8:1

8:1

8:1

25’ INC

+40.00

+22.53

+22.53

+22.53

+22.53

10+00

15+

00

20+00

-L- STA. 15+00.83

BEGIN APPROACH SLAP

-L- STA. 16+05.14

BEGIN APPROACH SLAB

-L- STA. 15+94.30

END BRIDGE

-L- STA. 16+02 TO 16+65 LT.

PROP, SHOULDER BERM GUTTER

REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE

-L- STA. 15+11.70

BEGIN BRIDGE

+00.00

+00.00& 30.00’

EXIST. R/W

60.00’

+50.00

30.00’+50.00

40.00’

40.00’

& 30.00’

EXIST. R/W

+00.00

+35.00+00.00

70.00’

+50.00

30.00’ 45.00’

30.00’ &

30.00’

45.00’

+00.00

& 30.00’

EXIST. R/W

+25.00

40.00’TO 16+65 LT.

-L- STA. 16+15

BERM GUTTER

PROP, SHOULDER

PAY ITEM

STRUCTURE

RIP RAP

CLASS II

30.00’

SE = SEE PLANS

PL COR.

EXIST. R/W

30.00’

PL

0401

0402

0404

0405

0400

0403

15" RCP-III

15" RCP-III

2GI, TYPE D

2GI, TYPE D

2GI, TYPE D

2GI, TYPE D



AT -L- STA. 13+ 75 Rt.TIE TO EXISTING DITCH

( Not to Scale)

2:12:1 D

B

b

LATERAL BASE DITCH

1"/Ft.

FROM -L- STA. 13+ 75 TO STA. 15+ 00 Rt.

DETAIL A

b= 3.0Ft.

B= 2.0Ft.

Min. D= 1.0Ft.

Ground

Natural

( Not to Scale)


STA. 15+ 05.00 -L- RT.

DETAIL B


5’min.

1.0’min.

T

TT

T

N 62°4

4’02"

W

116.4

5’

N 40°11’08" W155.20’

N 77°2

9’0

6"

W

44.3

5’

N 51°45’0

7" W134.11

’

N 81°00’24"

W

231.80’

N 23°10’25" E

302.98’

N 74°0

8’4

3"

W

552.8

3’

N 15°20’12" E

53.76’

N 54°03’4

7" W

28.51’

S 54°03’4

7" E

125.81’

S 15°13’30" W

110.32’ (R/

W-EIP)

106.44’ (E

IP-EIP)

N 75°3

0’3

0"

W

179.8

8’

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

45.0

0’

EIP

EIP

EIP

12’ GRAVEL

WOODEN PILINGS

WALLS, AND 12" ROUND

W/BST. DECK,TIMBER END

WOODEN BRIDGE

BRIDGE #203

STANLEY

CREEK

10’ B

ST

50 PR

50 PR

50 PR50 PR

50 PR

SER

VIC

E

STANLE

Y CREE

K

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

WOODS

618.47’

INV=

INV=619.88’

BL-4

DONNA K. LYMAN

DB 1936 PG 944

DB 2302 PG 625



DB 4319 PG 916

DB 4186 PG 900

HUGH M. DUNCAN, JR.

DB 4186 PG 900

HUGH M. DUNCAN, JR.

GATE

MTL

SHED

WOOD

SHED

1SFD

GATE

IRON

COLUMNS

ROCK

18"X18"

SEAT ELEV.=621.18

SEAT ELEV.=621.21 B4751-1

20’ BST

B4751-3

MON.

CONC.

W/ CATV

W/ CATV

W/ CATV

W/ CATV

W/ CATV

(WASHED OUT)50 PR

ABANDONED

AT&T

AT&T

Copper, OVERHEAD

AT&T Corp., 100 PR,


S 75°54’45"

W707.39’


72.84’+28.58

72.94’

+28.58

34.14’

+61.35

INV=619.79’

INV=619.58’

(2)-24" RCP

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

590

600

610

620

630

640

V = 75MPHd

V = 50MPHd

590

600

610

620

630

640

-L- SR 1935

W ILLOW SIDE DR.

BEGIN GRADE

-L- STA. 13+ 50.00

ELEV. = 623.92’-L- STA. 17+ 65.00

ELEV. = 623.83’

END GRADE


BM #1 ELEV. = 626.53’

-L- STA. 11+ 22.13

33.12’ LEFT


PI = 14+30.00

EL = 624.02’

(+)0.1250% (-)0.3148%

VC = 160’

K = 364

PI = 17+00.00

EL = 623.17’

(+)1.0154%

VC = 130’

K = 98

-L- STA. 16+ 16.00-L- STA. 15+ 16.00

PAY ITEM

STRUCTURE

CLASS II RIP RAP

PAY ITEMSTRUCTURE

CLASS II RIP RAP

RIGHT DITCH

-L- Sta. 15+00.000

(-) 0.6800%(-) 2.8400%

(-) 0.9600%

(-) 4.2000%


-L- Sta. 14+00.000

END RT. DITCH GRADE

El = 611.46’

El = 613.63’

DITCH LEGEND

PI =14+25.000

El = 613.46

PI =14+50.000

El = 612.75

PI =14+75.000

El = 612.51

DESIGN DISCHARGE

DESIGN FREQUENCY

BASE DISCHARGE

CFS

YRS

YRS

BASE FREQUENCY




CFS

YRS

FT

FT

FT

DESIGN HW ELEVATION

BASE HW ELEVATION


FT

DATE OF SURVEY

W.S. ELEVATION


= 2000

= 25

= 619.1

= 3559

= 100

= 621.26

= 4668

= 500+

= 623.3

=

= 05/28/14

= 610.2

2:1

1.5:1

1.5:1

610.20’

W SE

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

C

F

F

F

C

F

NAD 83

pre-construction notification (pcn) form gaston... · pre-construction notification (pcn) form ......

Documents