Presentation Evaluation

Faculty of Engineering, UNISEL Faculty of Engineering, UNISELPresentation Evaluation 1 Faculty of Engineering, UNISEL | Error! No text of specified style in document. 1

Name : Matrics No :

Course /CourseCode : Programme :

Topic Presentation :

ELEMENT Poor

(1)

Fair

(2)

Good

(3)

Exceptional

(4)

Marks

Coherence &

Organization

(2)

Difficult to

follow because

there is no

sequence of

information.

No objective,

no purpose, no

examples.

Audience has

difficulty

following

presentation

because student

jumps around.

Some purpose &

a few examples

given but no

clear conclusion.

Student presents

information in

logical sequence

which audience

can follow. Some

purpose, some

examples and

some conclusion

given.

Student presents

information in logical,

interesting sequence

which audience can

follow and appreciate.

Clear purpose and

conclusion. Many

relevant examples

given.

Content

(2)

Content is not

clear;

information

included that

does not

support the

topic in any

way

There is a great

deal of

information that

is not clearly

connected to the

topic

Sufficient

information that

relates to the

topic, many good

points made but

there is an uneven

balance and little

variation

An abundance of

material clearly related

to the topic; points are

clearly made and all

evidence supports

content; varied use of

materials

Subject

Knowledge

(2)

Student does

not have grasp

of information;

student cannot

answer

questions

about subject.

Student is

uncomfortable

with information

and is able to

answer only

elementary

questions, but

fails to elaborate.

Student is at ease

and answers most

questions with

explanations and

some elaboration.

Student demonstrates

full knowledge (more

than required) by

answering all

questions with

explanations and

elaboration.

Creativity

(1)

Repetitive

with little or

no variety;

insufficient

use of

multimedia

Little or no

variation;

material

presented with

little originality

or interpretation

Some originality

apparent; good

variety and

blending of

materials/media

Very original

presentation of

material; uses the

unexpected to full

advantage; captures

audience's attention

Communication

Techniques

(1)

Mumbles,

incorrectly

pronounces

terms, and

speaks too

softly to be

heard.

Student's voice is

low. Student

incorrectly

pronounces

terms. Cannot

hear properly.

Student's voice is

clear. Student

pronounces most

words correctly.

Student uses a clear

voice and correct,

precise pronunciation

of terms. Can hear

clearly.

Presentation Evaluation

Faculty of Engineering, UNISEL Faculty of Engineering, UNISELPresentation Evaluation 1 Faculty of Engineering, UNISEL | Error! No text of specified style in document. 2

Visual Aids

(1)

Student uses

excessive

visual aids or

no visual aids.

Student

occasionally uses

visual aids that

rarely support

the presentation.

Student's visual

aids relate to the

presentation.

Student's visual aids

explain and reinforce

the presentation.

Eye Contact

(1)

No eye contact

and only reads

from notes.

Occasionally

uses eye contact,

but still reads

mostly from

notes.

Maintains eye

contact most of

the time but

frequently returns

to notes.

Student maintains eye

contact with audience,

seldom returning to

notes.

Attire

(1)

Poorly attired;

messy hair;

dirty clothes.

Clean and

attractive but not

proper for

occasion.

Acceptable.

Appropriately dressed

for occasion.

Confidence

(1)

Stammer/long

pauses

throughout

presentation.

Some

confidence, at

times appears

awkward.

Slouch.

Showing

confidence most

of the time.

Speak with

confidence. Stand

straight. Handle

audience easily.

Manners

(1)

Speak and

answer

questions in a

rude manner.

A few times

speak and

answer questions

in a rude manner.

Speak and answer

questions in a

courteous manner

most o the time.

Always speak and

answer in a courteous

manner.

Worthiness

(1)

Fails to

provide any

understanding.

Audience leaves

with a little

understanding on

the topic.

Audience leaves

with some

knowledge

although not so

clear.

Audience leaves with

new ideas and

knowledge.

Audience

Response

(1)

Incoherent;

audience lost

interest and

could not

determine the

point of the

presentation

Some related

facts but went

off topic and lost

the audience;

mostly presented

facts with little

or no

imagination

Presented facts

with some

interesting

"twists"; held the

audience's

attention most of

the time

Involved the audience

in the presentation;

points made in

creative way; held the

audience's attention

throughout

TOTAL / 60 Comments:

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Examiner :

Signature :

Date :