prokopy - moving the needle on conservation practices

31
Moving the Needle on Conservation Practice Adoption Linda Stalker Prokopy , Ph.D. Purdue University benziecd.org

Upload: soil-and-water-conservation-society

Post on 15-Apr-2017

621 views

Category:

Environment


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Moving the Needle on

Conservation Practice Adoption

Linda Stalker Prokopy, Ph.D.

Purdue University

benziecd.org

Page 2: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Natural Resource Social

Science Lab at Purdue

Surveys

Interviews

Literature reviews

Focus groups

Facilitated meetings

Page 3: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Overview

Problems:

– Picking a watershed

– Getting people engaged in watershed

management

– Reaching individual farmers

The Crux: Asking critical questions and

challenging assumptions

Page 4: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Problem 1: Picking a watershed

Assumption: Limited funds and can’t work

everywhere

Not all watersheds are created equal

Page 5: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Where Programs Succeed

• Paid watershed staff

• Active conservation groups

• Inter-agency trust and collaboration

• Problem salience and awareness

• “Basic” BMPs already adopted

• Some farmers are conservation leaders

Babin et al., In Press, Land Use Policy

Page 6: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Indian Creek, Illinois

Since 2011, over 50% of land is now in

some form of conservation

Images: ctic.orgIndian Creek research funded by Illinois Soybean Association

Page 7: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Indian Creek, Illinois

Problem salience

Cohesive community

Minimal rented land

Small watershed

Dedicated staff

Photos: pantagraph.com; blogs.usda.gov

Page 8: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Problem 2: Getting People

Engaged

Assumption: Need to change status quo

Prokopy et al., 2014, Society and Natural Resources

Page 9: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Indian Creek, Illinois

Photo: ctic.org

Steering Committee

“everyone feels like they’re

part of it”

Page 10: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Indian Creek, Illinois

Steering Committee

Funding

Page 11: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Indian Creek, Illinois

Steering Committee

Funding

Engagement of retailers

“bringing industry into it. . Farmers listen to ag retailers. . It’s their own people they’ve been working with. .”

Page 12: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Partnerships in Indian Creek

“Back to the issue of what do I see as being the key

elements for success? Good working relationships

amongst all of the various entities that can be involved.

And that includes the fertilizer chemical dealers, the

fertilizer chemical association, the various AG groups

and organizations, the fertilizer supply companies…all

the way up and down through the food chain…for the

AG suppliers. And, locally here in the watershed, we’ve

had a very good buy-in amongst the various

organizations… Partnerships and buy-in” – Fertilizer

Dealer

Page 13: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Q: Please indicate how influential the following groups and individuals are when you make decisions about agricultural practices and strategies

Results from a 2012 survey of Midwestern corn producers conducted by Useful to Usable (U2U) and SustainableCorn.org

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Strong Influence

Moderate Influence

Slight Influence

No Influence

No contact

Prokopy et al. 2014. Purdue Extension Publication FNR-488-W; Davidson et al. 2015, Journal of Environmental Quality

Page 14: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Who do non-Extension ag advisors trust for climate information?

Distrust TrustProkopy,

Carlton, et al.,

2015, Climatic

Change

Page 15: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Problem 3: Reaching Individual

Farmers

Mark Tomer, ACPF image

Page 16: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

social networks

Page 17: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

1982-2007: 55 U.S. Studies

looked at BMP adoption

Meta-analysis results published in Prokopy et al., 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation and Baumgart-Getz, Prokopy, Floress, 2012, Journal of Environmental Management.

Page 18: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

1982-2007: 55 U.S. Studies

Overall Finding:

– Very few generalizable trends

However

Age

Page 19: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

1982-2007: 55 U.S. Studies

Overall Finding:

– Very few generalizable trends

However

Farm size

Page 20: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

1982-2007: 55 U.S. Studies

Overall Finding:

– Very few generalizable trends

However

Environmental

attitudes

Page 21: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Attitudes

Three types of farmers:

- motivated by farm as business

- motivated by stewardship concerns

- motivated by off-farm environmental benefits

Reimer, Thompson, Prokopy, 2012, Agriculture and Human Values

Page 22: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

1982-2007: 55 U.S. Studies

Overall Finding:

– Very few generalizable trends

However

Page 23: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Q: Please indicate how influential the following groups and individuals are when you make decisions about agricultural practices and strategies

Results from a 2012 survey of Midwestern corn producers conducted by Useful to Usable (U2U) and SustainableCorn.org

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Strong Influence

Moderate Influence

Slight Influence

No Influence

No contact

Prokopy et al. 2014. Purdue Extension Publication FNR-488-W; Davidson et al. 2015, Journal of Environmental Quality

Page 24: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Do formal networks work?

Study of participants in Adapt-N and On

Farm Network in Indiana

Longer participation = more reports of

changing nitrogen rates and practices

BUT

– the participating farmers were already higher

performing than other farmers

– the participating farmers did not talk to others

about what they learned

Page 25: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Practice Characteristics also

Important

Focus on:• Raising awareness of on-

farm and financial benefits

• Environmental benefits• Compatibility with

current farm practices

Reimer, Weinkauf, Prokopy, 2012, Journal of Rural Studies

Indiana Prairie Farmer

Page 26: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Diffusion of Innovations (Rogers)

Early Majority

34%

Late Majority

34%

Early Adopters

13.5%

Innovators

2.5%

Laggards16%

x - 2sd x - sd x x + sd

knowledge persuasion implementation confirmationdecision

Page 27: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

What motivates maintenance?

Local networks – being connected to

community groups

– Social norm towards BMP maintenance?

Sense of ownership is important

– Hesitancy to participate in government

programs leads to longer term maintenance

Adam Baumgart-Getz, Ph.D. Dissertation, 2010

Page 28: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Early Adopters of Cover Crops

Likely to keep using:

– Years of experience

– Believe trial and error effective means of

learning

– Supportive landlords

Likely to discontinue: self-funders

Dunn et al., In Press, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Page 29: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Takeaways

• Initially select watersheds with greater

chance of success

• Still need trusted innovators to adopt

• Partner with trusted advisors

• Think about maintenance

• How can practice be compatible with

ongoing practices?

• Explore formal networks

• Understand local context and issues

Page 30: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Additional Considerations

Information is necessary but not sufficient

– How disseminate?

Demonstration projects?

Internet?

Twitter?

Money is necessary but not sufficient

We must challenge assumptions, i.e.

– Does citizen science change behaviors?

– Do recognition programs for leading farmers

change behaviors?

Page 31: prokopy - Moving the Needle on Conservation Practices

Contact Information:

Linda Prokopy

[email protected]

http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~lprokopy/

@lprokopy

Photo credit: nasa.gov

Questions?