reaction jose y. cueto jr., md, mhped professional regulatory board of medicine
TRANSCRIPT
REACTIONREACTION
Jose Y. Cueto Jr., MD, MHPEdJose Y. Cueto Jr., MD, MHPEd
Professional Regulatory Board of Professional Regulatory Board of MedicineMedicine
Situation: MedicineSituation: Medicine
38 medical schools38 medical schools
Based on institutional passing Based on institutional passing percentage in PLEpercentage in PLE
21 schools: satisfactory performance 21 schools: satisfactory performance 17 schools: poorly performing17 schools: poorly performing
2000-2012 Medical School2000-2012 Medical SchoolAccreditationAccreditation
UP-MlaUP-Mla UERMMMCUERMMMC CIMCIM USTUST SLUSLU FEUFEU XUXU DLSUDLSU
ArticleArticle
Education for Health, Vol. 19, Education for Health, Vol. 19, Number 2, July 2006Number 2, July 2006
Title: “Accreditation of Title: “Accreditation of Undergraduate Medical Training Undergraduate Medical Training Programs: Practices in Nine Programs: Practices in Nine Developing Countries as Compared Developing Countries as Compared with the United States”with the United States”
AuthorsAuthors
Jose Cueto Jr Vanessa C. Burch Nor Azila Mohd Adnan Bosede B. Afolabi, Zalina Ismail Wasim Jafri E. Oluwabunmi Olapade-Olaopa Boaz Otieno-Nyunya
AuthorsAuthors
Avinash Supe Altantsetseg Togoo Ana Lia Vargas Elizabeth Wasserman Page S. Morahan William Burdick Nancy Gary
CountriesCountries ArgentinaArgentina IndiaIndia KenyaKenya MalaysiaMalaysia MongoliaMongolia NigeriaNigeria PakistanPakistan PhilippinesPhilippines South AfricaSouth Africa USAUSA
Accreditation DataAccreditation Data Argentina Argentina (28)(28)
MandatoryMandatory
India India (233)(233)
MandatoryMandatory
Kenya Kenya (2)(2)
MandatoryMandatory
Malaysia Malaysia (13) (13)
VoluntaryVoluntary
Mongolia Mongolia (5) (5)
VoluntaryVoluntary
Nigeria Nigeria (16) (16)
MandatoryMandatory
Pakistan Pakistan (35) (35)
MandatoryMandatory
Philippines Philippines (35) (35)
VoluntaryVoluntary
South Africa South Africa (8) (8)
MandatoryMandatory
USA USA (126)(126)
VoluntaryVoluntary
US SystemUS System
Accrediting body: LCMEAccrediting body: LCME VoluntaryVoluntary Functions as a mandatory systemFunctions as a mandatory system Only graduates of LCME-accredited Only graduates of LCME-accredited
schools can take the USMLEschools can take the USMLE All medical schools accreditedAll medical schools accredited
NAAC for Quality in Higher EducationDr. Madhukar
11
Type of InstitutionsType of Institutions No. of No. of Institutions Institutions (as of Feb 2012)(as of Feb 2012)
Central UniversitiesCentral Universities 4343State UniversitiesState Universities 297297Deemed UniversitiesDeemed Universities 130130Institutions of National Institutions of National ImportanceImportance
6565
Private UniversitiesPrivate Universities 100100TotalTotal 635635
CollegesColleges 3302333023
Higher Education in India – A Glimpse
Source : UGC Annual report 2011 -2012
ObservationObservation
All 233 medical schools in India are All 233 medical schools in India are externally accreditedexternally accredited
All 126 medical schools in the US are All 126 medical schools in the US are externally accreditedexternally accredited
Only 8 out of the 38 PH medical Only 8 out of the 38 PH medical schools have participated in the schools have participated in the external accreditation systemexternal accreditation system
Accrediting Bodies Accrediting Bodies Year Established/Years of Year Established/Years of
ExistenceExistence
PAASCUPAASCU 1957 (56 1957 (56 years)years)
PACUCOAPACUCOA 1973 (40 1973 (40 years)years)
ACSC-AAACSC-AA 1976 (37 1976 (37 years)years)
AACCUPAACCUP 1989 (24 1989 (24 years)years)
ConditionsConditions
1.1. External accreditation must be External accreditation must be voluntary.voluntary.
2.2. It must be independent. It must be independent.
3.3. It must not have government It must not have government participation.participation.
ConditionsConditions
1. It must be voluntary1. It must be voluntary
2. It must be 2. It must be independent.independent.
3. It must not have 3. It must not have government government participationparticipation
1. It must be 1. It must be mandatory.mandatory.
2. It must allow 2. It must allow supervision or some supervision or some oversight function.oversight function.
3. It must allow 3. It must allow government government participation.participation.
The Real Role of The Real Role of Accrediting BodiesAccrediting Bodies
Is the accreditation system Is the accreditation system responsible for the high quality of responsible for the high quality of medical education in our country?medical education in our country?
UST: 400 yearsUST: 400 years UP: 100 yearsUP: 100 years PAASCU: started by Catholic schools PAASCU: started by Catholic schools
in 1957in 1957
57 years57 years
With so many years difference between With so many years difference between the establishment of the schools, and the establishment of the schools, and establishment of accrediting body, the establishment of accrediting body, the role was focused on validating the role was focused on validating the excellent practices of the two schools.excellent practices of the two schools.
But with relatively younger schools, the But with relatively younger schools, the accrediting bodies should have a accrediting bodies should have a developmental role developmental role
Not possible if only 11-15% of HEI’s have Not possible if only 11-15% of HEI’s have voluntarily participated in the systemvoluntarily participated in the system
Side story to our articleSide story to our article
Initially submitted to Academic Initially submitted to Academic MedicineMedicine
Then to Medical TeacherThen to Medical Teacher Eventually to Education for HealthEventually to Education for Health
Reason: the first two wanted revisions Reason: the first two wanted revisions to include the IMPACT of to include the IMPACT of accreditation on the quality of accreditation on the quality of institutions and graduatesinstitutions and graduates
Realities in the Realities in the Philippine SettingPhilippine Setting
Where is the evidence about the Where is the evidence about the IMPACT of external accreditation?IMPACT of external accreditation?
If only 11-15% have volunteered to If only 11-15% have volunteered to participate in the accreditation participate in the accreditation process, how can the system help process, how can the system help the 85% of HEI’s improve their the 85% of HEI’s improve their quality of education and the quality quality of education and the quality of their graduates?of their graduates?
A Study to Determine A Study to Determine ImpactImpact
“Medical Education Accreditation in Mexico and the Philippines: Impact on Student Outcomes”
Marta van Zanten, Danette McKinley, Irene Durante Montiel & Concepcion V Pijano
Medical Education, 2012, 46, 586-592
Study: correlationStudy: correlation
Outcomes (first attempt pass rate on USMLE components and rate of
ECFMG certification) Medical school accreditation
USMLE ComponentsUSMLE Components
Part I: Basic SciencesPart I: Basic Sciences Part II: Clinical SciencesPart II: Clinical Sciences Part II: Performance-basedPart II: Performance-based
Results of the studyResults of the study
Correlation only in Part ICorrelation only in Part I
CONCLUSIONS. These findings support the
value and usefulness of accreditation in Mexico
and the Philippines by linking accreditation to
improved student outcomes
QuestionsQuestions From the perspective of the accrediting From the perspective of the accrediting
bodies, what kind of interventions in the bodies, what kind of interventions in the present accreditation system should be present accreditation system should be adopted?adopted?
How can accreditation help in the reform How can accreditation help in the reform of the educational system?of the educational system?
How can it help the implementation of the How can it help the implementation of the PQF, and its referencing to the AQRF in PQF, and its referencing to the AQRF in 2018?2018?