road and transportation masterplan · road and transportation masterplan palestine ta 2012013 ps 00...

ROAD AND TRANSPORTATION MASTERPLAN

PALESTINE

TA 2012013 PS 00 F10 IV.5 Public Transport

SEPTEMBER 30,2016

Table

1

2 O

2.1 S

2.2 K

3 P

3.1 P

3.2 P

3.3 P

3.3.1 P

3.3.2 P

3.3.3 P

3.3.4 P

3.4 P

e of Conten

Introduction ..

Overview of P

SWOT Analys

Key-Level Fac

Public Transp

Public Transp

Public Transp

Public Transp

Public Transp

Public Transp

Public Transp

Public Transp

Public Transp

IV.5 -1Road

nts

....................

Public Transp

sis of Existing

ctors Definitio

port Network

ort Spoke-Hu

ort Multi-Mod

ort Network P

port Supply in

port Supply in

port Supply in

port Supply in

ort and Urban

and Transportation

.....................

port Sector .....

g Public Trans

on for Public T

Proposal ......

ub Network ....

dal Supply .....

Proposal Dev

n Phase 1 (20

n Phase 2 (20

n Phase 3 (20

n Phase 4 (20

n Developme

n Master Plan | Pal

.....................

.....................

sport Sector ..

Transport ......

.....................

.....................

.....................

elopment by

016 – 2024) ...

025 – 2031) ...

032 – 2037) ...

038 – 2045) ...

ents. ..............

estine – 30/09/201

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

Phases ........

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

6

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.............. 12

.............. 14

.............. 19

.............. 22

.....................

................. 4

................. 4

................. 4

................. 6

................. 7

................. 7

............... 10

............... 10

............... 25

List o

Figure

Figure

Figure

Figure

Figure

Figure

Figure

Figure

Figure

Figure

Figure

Figure

Figure

Figure

of Figures

1. Public Tr

2. Public Tr

3. Inter-city

4. PT Moda

5. Bus Rap

6. BRT Cor

7. PT Moda

8. BRT Cor

9. BRT Cor

10. PT Moda

11. BRT Cor

12. PT Moda

13. Road-Ba

14. Rail-Base

IV.5 -2Road

ransport Back

ransport Netw

Bus in Munic

al Split (Road

id Transit in Q

rridors Schem

al Split (Road

rridors Schem

rridors Schem

al Split (Road

rridors Schem

al Split (Road

ased PT Traffi

ed PT Traffic

and Transportation

kbone Schem

work (2045) ...

ch, Germany .

and Rail) in P

Quito, Ecuado

me for Ramalla

and Rail) in P

me for East Je

me for Hebron

and Rail) in P

me for Gaza C

and Rail) in P

ic Volume Tre

Volume Tren

n Master Plan | Pal

me ..................

.....................

.....................

Phase 1 (%) .

or ..................

ah-Al Bireh-B

Phase 2 (%) .

erusalem Hub

Hub ............

Phase 3 (%) .

City Hub ........

Phase 4 (%) .

end (2015 – 2

nd (2015 – 20

estine – 30/09/201

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

Beitunia Hub a

.....................

b and Bethlehe

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

2045) (pax) ...

045) (pax) .....

6

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

and Nablus H

....................

em ...............

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

................ 8

.............. 11

.............. 13

.............. 14

.............. 15

ub ......... 15

.............. 19

.............. 20

.............. 21

.............. 21

.............. 22

.............. 23

.............. 24

.............. 24

List o

Tab 1.

Tab 2.

Tab 3.

Tab 4.

Tab 5.

Tab 6.

of Tables

SWOT A

SWOT A

Public Tr

Public Tr

Public Tr

Public Tr

IV.5 -3Road

Analysis of Ex

Analysis of Ex

ransport Supp

ransport Supp

ransport Supp

ransport Supp

and Transportation

isting Public T

isting Public T

ply for Phase

ply for Phase

ply for Phase

ply for Phase

n Master Plan | Pal

Transport: Inf

Transport: Op

1 ..................

2 ..................

3 ..................

4 ..................

estine – 30/09/201

frastructure a

perational and

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

6

nd Fleet .......

d Institutional

....................

....................

....................

....................

................ 4

............... 5

.............. 12

.............. 14

.............. 19

.............. 22

This chfor a resituatio

2

Public integracooperbuses Buses used mlanes nconditioPublic

•

• •

•

2

The folpublic tand Ins

• High an

• Regis2,60gen

• Smallof u

1 Introdu

hapter shows enewed publicon, carried ou

2 Overvi

transport exisated system; orate under a sand shared tausually trave

mode of publicnor signals arons. transport is re

Issuing licengalleries, buDeveloping Monitoring aprograms; Formulatingrelevant sta

2.1 SWOT A

llowing SWOTtransport secstitutional and

Ta

Stren

demand for pubnd Gaza Strip, wh

exceedtration fees are:

00 Nis per year cnerate high incom

A-sized vehicles a

unexpected unre

IV.5 -4Road

uction

the proposalc transport syt with a SWO

iew of Pub

sts both in Weon the contrarsingle and unaxi, furthermol when full or c transport. Pre currently pr

egulated by th

nsing servicesus companiestraining curri

and enhancin

g legislation toakeholders.

Analysis of

T analysis aimctor in West Bd Operational

ab 1. SWOT An

P

ngths

lic transport bothhere patronage ads bus capacity; 100 Nis per yea

cab taxi. Togetheme for Local PubAuthorities; allow for better flest and/or military

and Transportation

for public traystem is introdOT analysis an

lic Transp

est Bank andry, it is compoified system.

ore cab taxi caalmost full alublic Transporesent; stops

he MoT that i

s, machinery,s, technical cecula, and pro

ng traffic safet

o regulate traf

f Existing P

ms at providinank and Gaz topics.

nalysis of Existing

Public Transport

h in West Bank almost ever

r for buses and r with fuel tax

blic Transport

exibility in case y roadblocks.

n Master Plan | Pal

ansport sectorduced with a nd the definiti

ort Sector

Gaza Strip hosed of severSupply is maan be consideong variable

ort routes are are not frequ

s responsible

, garages andentres, drivingviding profesty through gu

ffic and achie

ublic Trans

ng a critical sea Strip. It is fo

g Public Transpo

Infrastructure an

• N

• U• U

• pc

• Faincpub

• pub

estine – 30/09/201

r included in tbrief overviewon of key-lev

howeverit doeral private initainly based onered as a formroutes, while not properly ent and statio

e of:

d workshops, g schools; sional trainingidance broch

eve traffic safe

sport Sector

et of highlightocused on Inf

ort: Infrastructure

nd Fleet

W

eeded small-size

Unscheduled servUnscheduled pu

negative effecpublic transport wcertain only durin

are structure is hicome; furthermorblic transportatio

blic transport Flelife is

6

the NTMP. Thw on the existel factors.

es not work asiatives that don two modes, m of para-transhared taxi isequipped: no

ons are not in

car rent offic

g courses; ures and awa

ety in coordin

r

ts concerningfrastructure a

e and Fleet

Weaknesses

ed vehicles implyoperational cos

vices affect publiblic transport rou

cts on both safetyworking time is nong the day and it

sunset; igh if compared tre, it does not incn or lower fares

and commuteret is old: buses anormally set at 2

he proposal ting

s an o not namely

nsit. s the most o dedicated n very good

es, car

areness

ation with

existing nd Fleet,

y high investmensts; c transport reliab

utes have significy and congestionot defined: servicis not provided a

to customers’ avclude subscriptiofor frequent cust

rs; and shared taxi s20 years;

nt and

bility; cant n; ce is after

erage ons for tomers

service

• Enhapublic

private

• Imprgrow

• Improvfacto

• Agrean

• Mo

• Motran

unions

• Pubavai

• Pu

• A corco

• MoTdefin

• Sever

• Privaincreas

• West Ba bo

Opportu

anced standardsc transport, resue-based transpo

proved public tran

wth and increase jextension of s

ved public transpr, stimulating bot

Tab

Stren

eements, studiesnd can be used toT and Local De

connected oT holds good rensport stakeholdes) allowing for str

transpolic transport infralable and repres

deublic transport ca

framework, nee

Opportu

rpus of reformativontribute to stimuT holds a legal d

nition of new laws

ral international dPNA’s de

te investments insing, involving al

Bank aBank-Gaza Strip oost to national e

IV.5 -5Road

unities

can lead to highlting also more art for the majority

population; nsport can stimuljob opportunitiesservice is consid

port can act as a th social and cult

2. SWOT Analy

Pub

ngths

, plans and datato develop publicpartments are prautomated syste

elationships with ers (i.e. private inrong partnership ort enhancement;astructure are alrent assets for pu

evelopment; an rely on existingeding to be re-org

unities

ve laws already eulate general devdepartment in chas aimed at reform

sector; donors are intereevelopment plann Palestine havelso public transpoand Gaza Strip; Corridor Link re

economy and soc

and Transportation

her demand of affordable than y of Palestinian

ate economic s (i.e. if a night dered); social cohesion tural activities.

ysis of Existing P

blic Transport Op

, are available c transport; rovided with ems; main public nvestors and aimed at public ; ready partially ublic transport

g regulatory ganised.

exists; this can velopment; arge with the ming transport

ested in funding s;

e been recently ort in both West

alisation entails cial cohesion.

n Master Plan | Pal

• Pudiff

• Co

reli• C

• Un

Public Transport:

perational and In

• Mono

• Poo

• Im

•o

• Hig

• T

• H

• Pu

• U

•

• F

• Emdrfin

estine – 30/09/201

ublic Transport Fferent demand a

o

nstraints of moveroadblocks, ca

ability, also with Constrains on im

import nrest and riots ca

transport

: Operational and

nstitutional

W

nopolies giving oon public transpo

therefore tor operational m

companies, caplementation of s

aSigned agreem

obstructed by PNs

gh car accident r

Traffic regulationexisting or

igh number of tamanag

blic transport Suprovoking unce

Unavailability of pborder crossing

• Mobility restr

Funding donors ddevelopment, mployment decrearivers increase (snd a job) affecting

6

Fleet is not used re served by the

of fleet and headw

Threats

ements, operatedn affect negativea re-organised a

mport/export can bof transport tech

an lead to sabotat vehicles and inf

d Institutional

Weaknesses

operators (public/ort routes reducethe quality of servanagement of licausing very oftenstakeholders’ res

are not efficientlyments and MoUs NA’s weak capacisector managemrates, due to poo

road traffic safes and technical rr inappropriate (iaxis affects negatgement and devepervising body is

ertainties in stakecompetencies

public transport a causes delays a

Threats

riction affect socidevelopment

dependence, vitaight hinder prope

ase is directly linksince this represeg negatively pub

traffic condition

efficiently: routessame supply, in

way.

d with checkpoinely public transpoand scheduled seban and/or delayhnologies; age episodes of pfrastructure.

/private) exclusiv the competition vice provided; censed public tran financial lossessponsibilities andy set;

implementation ity of public trans

ment; or control and recety; requirements are.e. road sign); tively public tranelopment; s not currently preholders’ roles ans; automated facilitieand malfunctionin

al and economic; al for public transer planning policked to uncontrollent the easiest w

blic transport andns.

s with terms

nts and ort ervice; y the

public

ve right and

ansport s; d roles

is sport

cord of

e not

sport

resent, nd

es at ng.

c

sport ies; led taxi

way to road

2

The deinfrastrThe materms o

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

As it cocontrib

•

•

•

•

•

2.2 Key-Lev

efinition of keyructure and fleain key-level of infrastructu

Schedule Rproperly schheadway nedemand on Coverage aof West Banthe main traoperational Hierarchy anetwork incservices at dPassengersthe routes sservice andFleet RefurbinternationaNew Modesunedited cobus rapid traMulti-Modaldefine a reaSoft Mobilitypublic transbiking and w

oncerns the inbute to the enh

Service Rulcomposing (bus); Stakeholderother relevalegal and reFare Structutransport neSubsides anwith and disSafety and and at all PT

IV.5 -6Road

vel Factors

y-level factorseet, and institfactors that c

ure and fleet p

Reliability and heduled servieeds to be redeach single r

and Operationnk and Gaza ansport hubs time needs tond Poles: publuding hubs, mdifferent scale

s Facilities: puserving both W the safety ofbishment: pubal best practiss Introductionollective transpansit, light rapity: public tra

al multi-modaly: when possport supply nwalking for wh

nstitutional anhancement of

es: public trathe entire net

r Coordinationant stakeholdeegulatory vulnure: Tariff sysetwork, from tnd Funds: puscourage privaSecurity: conT facilities loc

and Transportation

s Definition

s for public tratutional and o

can contributeprovision follo

Headway: puce, granting aduced and deroutes; nal Time: publStrip, linking and attractor o be extendedblic transport main and seces; ublic transporWest Bank anf customers;blic transport es; : public transpport modes thpid transit); nsport supplyl service incluible, and accoeeds to involvhich ad hoc d

nd operationaf public transp

nsport sectortwork and priv

n:MoT need ters to assign

nus and respostem needs tothe smallest (tblic transport ate-vehicle-btrol on safety

cated along th

n Master Plan | Pal

for Public T

ansport in Weoperational toe to the enhanow:

ublic transporta stronger anefined accordi

lic transport sthe most urbapoles (i.e. und, with a creasupply needs

condary poles

rt passenger fnd Gaza Strip

fleet needs to

port supply nehat have alrea

y needs to inteuding road, raording to topove also the soevelopment p

al aspects, theport in Palest

r regulation nevate initiative

to draw Publicspecific comp

onsibilities’ ovo be defined ftaxi) to the laneeds to be

ased transpoy and security he network.

estine – 30/09/201

Transport

est Bank and pics.

ncement of pu

t supply needd certain reliaing to the exis

supply needs anised areas niversities, hoation of a nighs to be baseds, providing ef

facilities need, in order to im

o offer better

eeds to consiady shown go

eract with othail and maritimography and wo-called soft mpolicies need

e main key-levtine can be su

eeds to be cle: from the sm

c Transport rupetencies to d

verlaps; for all the modrgest (bus); subsidised inrt; needs to be

6

Gaza Strip is

ublic transpor

ds to be basedability; moreovsting and fore

to serve the eto the rural ospitals); more

ht service; d on a hierarcfficient public

d to be providemprove the q

standards, ba

ider the introdood results ab

her transport mme transport; weather condmobility compto be set.

vel factors thaummarised as

early set for aallest (taxi) to

ules in coordidistinct bodies

des composin

n order to be c

enforced both

s focused on

rt sector in

d on a ver ecast

entire area ones with eover

hical transport

ed along all uality of the

ased on

duction of broad (i.e.

modes to

ditions, prising

at can s follows:

all modes o the largest

nation with s, avoiding

ng public

competitive

h on-board

3

The proin the f

• •

The proexistingarea coThe actransposervicetranspoby a se

3

The dedemogmillion million)West Bcities: RGaza Cthem inThe prostructusame lin the NNablusinbounmost pand NaThese locatedgeneraconsideoutsidewhich isystemdemogto the r

1 PCBS, 2 The GoQalqiliyadensity rpeople pGoverno

3 Public

oposal for a pfollowing two

Public TransPublic Trans

oposed systeg demand, imovered by pubchievement ofort network, ine, combining dort.On this coet of maps pro

3.1 Public T

efinition of pubgraphic trends

people live b) and this valu

Bank and GazRamallah, EaCity, Rafah, anto one nationoposed publicring the entireevel of servicNorth of Wests. Five main hd and outbou

populated citieablus. five hubs are

d outside the ating minor buer only the ree the backboninclusion app

m. Public transgraphic paramresults of the

Annual Statisticovernorates of Ga, Salfit and Tubaratios that differ vper km2, while Weorates are those w

IV.5 -7Road

Transport

public transpomain aspects

sport Infrastrusport Service

em considers mproving the lblic transport f these three nvolving bothdifferent – an

oncern, the foloduced for th

Transport S

blic transport s in West Banbetween Westue is expecteza Strip is notast Jerusalemand Khan Younal urban sysc transport sye network, coce. The backbt Bank, where

hubs are locatund systematies, namely: G

e all interconnidentified bac

ut important flelations betwene to catch otears vital for sport urban p

meters, in line survey camp

s-Estimated Popaza City and He

as possess the lovery much amonest Bank’s averawith the highest

and Transportation

t Network P

ort in West Bas:

ucture Netwoe Supply.

equally Westevel of servicsupply. main objectiv urban and nod sometimes llowing parage purpose.

Spoke-Hub

network startnk and Gaza St Bank (around to increaset uniformly sp

m, Hebron, Beunis, in Gaza stem where eaystem unveilsonceived to cobone runs bete it crosses thted along the ic and occasio

Gaza City, Heb

nected each ockbone, whereows of passe

een the five mther primary uthe achievemoles and extrwith what is d

paign carried o

pulation in the Pabron are the mosowest populationg each other: Ga

age density rate snumber of urban

n Master Plan | Pal

Proposal

ank and Gaza

rk;

t Bank and Gace of existing

ves is possibleon-urban areanew for Wes

graphs provide

Network

ts from an attStrip. Accordind 2.93 million up to around

pread2, indeedethlehem, JeriStrip. An ideaach city plays said ideal linover both Wetween Rafah he most urban

backbone, aonal flow of pbron, East Je

other. Moreove other poles

engers. The pmain hubs, on urban poles ament of a souna-urban nodedone for publout simultane

alestinian Territorst populated, on

n rate. The differeaza Strip holds thstands at 468 pen centers.

estine – 30/09/201

a Strip herein

aza Strip andpublic transpo

e only throughas, and a mu

st Bank and Ge detailed info

entive analysng to the PCB

n) and Gaza Sd 13 million ind, today Palescho, Nablus a

al linear axis cs its role and hnear axis and st Bank and Gin the South onised areas bttracting and

people. Theseerusalem, Ram

er, they are aare located,

pattern of connthe contrary nd secondarynd and efficiees are identifieic transport h

eously at the b

ry Mid-Year By Gthe contrary the

ence of populatiohe third highest deople per km2. In

6

presented is

d aims at satisort, and incre

h a widesprealti-modal pub

Gaza Strip – mormation acco

sis of recent aBS currently aStrip (around 2050.1Populstinians live mand Jenin, in could be traceholds its impoturns it into aGaza Strip wiof Gaza Strip

between Hebrgenerating th

e hubs consismallah-Al Bire

also linked witattracting andnections thereit extends alo

y extra-urban nt public traned according

hubs, and accbiggest termin

Governorate, 199Governorates o

on distribution is density rate worldgeneral, the mo

described

sfying easing the

ad public lic transport

modes of ompanied

and future around 4.81 1.88 ation in

mainly in West Bank;

ed to link ortance. a backbone th the and Jenin

ron and he biggest t in the

eh-Beitunia,

th areas d efore do not ong and nodes sport to

cording also nals of

97-2006. f Jericho, confirmed by dwide, 4045 st populated

public tTranspurban p

transport in Wport Survey.Thpoles, follows

IV.5 -8Road

West Bank anhe scheme ofs.

and Transportation

d Gaza Strip.f public transp

Figure 1. Publ

n Master Plan | Pal

. For more deport backbone

lic Transport Bac

estine – 30/09/201

etail, refer to; e, with the lis

ckbone Scheme

6

¶ Annex 12. Pt of hubs and

Public primary

Identifynodes)define constitappropFor this

•

• •

These West Bmultiplebigges

• • •

The soand Gabiggesareas, mobilityThe proboostinon the isolatedThis twsupply

3The spowhich alforms of generallyvarious t

ying public tra) composing tpublic transputive element

priate public trs reason, the

Regional Copoles at anyInter-Hub CInner-Hub C

three levels oBank and Gaze hubs, whicht to the small

Hub-to-HubHub-to-UrbaUrban Prima

o-defined connaza Strip servt part of tertiawhere the wey conditions. oposed publicng economy, other hand, itd, in contact w

wofold objectivthat is illustra

oke-hub distributl traffic moves altransport, with th

y take the shortetransport hubs to

IV.5 -9Road

ansport constthe public tranort network. Ots represents ransport netwfollowing thre

onnections; liy distance and

Connections; lConnections;

of connectionza Strip, struch connectivityest):

b an Primary Poary Poles-to-E

nectivity pattevicing both urbary functions veakest social

c transport neby networkingt acts as a sowith the centrve is achievabated in the fol

tion paradigm (oong spokes to hhe only exceptio

est or fastest routo allow passenge

and Transportation

itutive elemennsport proposOn this concethe next and

work. ee levels of c

nking each ofd then linkinginking the fiveservicing urb

s compose thctured accordy is organised

oles Extra-Urban S

ern allows pubbanised areavital for econogroups live, c

etwork has twg all the majo

ocial cohesionral ones. ble only throullowing parag

r model or netwoub at the center.n of road transpote between two pers to transfer be

n Master Plan | Pal

nts (backbonesal is propaedern, defining t indispensabl

onnectivity ar

f the five hubsg urban poles e hubs to eacan and peri-u

he entire proping to the hub

d in turn into m

Secondary No

blic transport s, where the omic developcurrently in st

wo main objecor economic cn factor, puttin

ugh an attentiraph.

ork) is a system In transportationort, where spokepoints. In public tetween different l

estine – 30/09/201

e, hubs, urbadeutic but not he connectiole step toward

re determined

s to the highewith closest e

ch other, usingurban connect

posed public tb-and-spoke mmultiple scales

odes

network to exmajority of pements is locatrong need fo

ctives: on the centres of Weng the periphe

ve definition o

of connections an, the spoke-hub

e-hub model doestransport, the spoines or transport

6

n poles and esufficient per

ns between thds the definiti

d:

est number ofextra-urban ng the fastest ptions at each

transport netwmodel3, that is, namely (fro

xtend over Weople lives anated, and extrar improvemen

one hand, it aest Bank and Geral areas, cu

of public trans

arranged like a wb model is applicas not apply becaoke-hub model utation modes.

extra-urban r se to hese on of an

f urban nodes. path. hub.

work for s hinged on om the

West Bank nd the a-urban nt of their

aims at Gaza Strip; urrently

sport

wire-wheel, in able to many use drivers

utilizes

3

A multiwhere Road-b

• •

Rail-ba

•

Public and priGaza SPort). Tof all thmaritim

3

The seoperatiphasesorganizOvervi Beforeentire p

3.2 Public T

i-modal transboth road-babased service

Inter-city BuBus Rapid T

ased service c

Inter-city Ra

transport supincipal transpStrip (Y. ArafaTherefore, puhe transport sme transport,

3.3 Public T

everal serviceive at the sams.For this reaszed by phaseiew.

proceeding tproposed sys

IV.5 -10Road

Transport M

port supply issed and unpr

es can be dist

us; Transit, along

consists of:

ail.

pply connectsport infrastructat Regional (Eblic transport

sub-sectors inair transport,

Transport N

s composing me time but deson, the desc

e.For more de

to describe instem is illustra

d and Transportatio

Multi-Modal

s proposed forecedented ratinguished be

g Urban Corrid

cities, townstures located EU-MENA) Ait supply’s mulncluded in theand border c

Network Pro

the overall suevelop and ex

cription of eacetails, refer to:

details the dated in the figu

on Master Plan | Pa

Supply

r public transail-based shaetween:

dor.

and villages in West Bank

irport, New Glti-modality is

e Master Plancrossing point

oposal Deve

upply proposextend accordch shared tran: ¶III – Road a

evelopment oure reported

alestine – 30/09/201

port in West Bred services a

with major bok (New Internaza Commerfurther enhan: road transpos.

elopment b

ed for public ting to the alrensport serviceand Transpor

of public transin the followin

16

Bank and Gaare provided.

order crossingnational Airporcial Port, Gaznced by the inort, rail transp

y Phases

transport do neady introduce herein presertation Master

sport by phasng page.

za Strip,

g points rt) and za Fishing nvolvement port,

not become ed ented is r Plan

e, the

IV.5 -11Road

Figu

d and Transportatio

ure 2. Public Tran

on Master Plan | Pa

nsport Network (2


2045)

16

3

Both ratranspo

• •

Inter-cproposRamalInter-cistationroutes,one hoInter-cdetails, As saidlisted inconnec

LineLLLLLLLLL

LLLLLLiLLiLLLiLLLLLLLLLLLiLi

3.3.1 Public

ail and road-bort supply con

Inter-city BuInter-city Ra

city busesopesed to carry plah-Al Bireh-Bity buses travs and once a, where majorour which maycity rail lineso, refer to: ¶IV

d above, the en the table bect hubs with b

e Number Line 1 Line 2^ Line 3 Line 4^ Line 5 Line 6 Line 7^ Line 8 Line 9

Line 10 ine 11* ine 12* ine 13*

Line 14 ine 15^

Line 16 ine 17^

Line 18 Line 19 ine 20^

Line 21 Line 22 Line 23 Line 24 Line 25 ine 26* ine 27* ine 28*

Line 29 Line 30 ine 31^ ine 32^

IV.5 -12Road

c Transport S

based shared nsists of:

uses network:ail Lines: 4 ST

erate on fixedassengers beBeitunia, Nabvel medium/lot the arrival sr mobility attray however beoperate betw

V.2 Rail Transp

entire inter-citelow. Lines inborder crossin

Ta

HuRamRamRamRamRamRamRamRamRamRamRamRamRamNabNabNabNabNabNabNabNabNabNabNabNabNabNabNabHebHebHebHeb

d and Transportatio

Supply in Pha

service are p

: 62 LINES; TATIONS;

d schedule anetween the fivlus) towns anng distances tation, with a actors are loc subjected to een Ramallahport.

ty bus networdicated with “

ng points.

ab 3. Public Tra

Road-Based

ub mallah mallah mallah mallah mallah mallah mallah mallah mallah mallah mallah mallah mallah blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus blus bron bron bron bron

on Master Plan | Pa

ase 1 (2016 –

proposed for P

nd are organizve main hubs nd villages loc

and stop malimited numb

cated. The provariations ba

h and Nablus

rk is hub-base“^” are Inter-H

ansport Supply fo

d Public Transpo

RRa

RRama

Na


– 2024)

Phase 1. Inde

zed by hub. In(Gaza City, H

cated in Westinly twice: on

ber of further soposed headwased on fluctu, servicing fou

ed and includHub Lines; lin

or Phase 1

ort

Line Ramallah-Tarq

Ramallah-HeRamallah-Beth

Ramallah-East Jeamallah-Bir Zayt

Ramallah-JerRamallah-Na

Ramallah-QalqRamallah-Tulk

Ramallah-JeRamallah-Freija

amallah-Al Jalamallah-Al Karama

Nablus-TarqNablus-He

Nablus-BethNablus-Ram

Nablus-East JeNablus-Bir Zayt

Nablus-JerNablus-QalqNablus-Tulk

Nablus-JeNablus-Sa

Nablus-TuNablus-Freija

Nablus-Al Jalamablus-Al Karama

Hebron-TarqHebron-BethHebron-Ram

Hebron-East Je

16

eed, in this ph

nter-city buseHebron, East t Bank and Gace at the depstops locatedway for inter-cuations in demur stations. F

es 62 lines thes indicate w

Name umiya-Ramallahbron-Ramallah lehem-Ramallah

erusalem-RamallUniversity-Ramaricho-Ramallah

ablus-Ramallah qiliya-Ramallah karm-Ramallah

enin-Ramallah atBCP-Ramallahmeh BCP-RamalBridge BCP-Ramumiya-Nablus bron-Nablus lehem-Nablus

mallah-Nablus erusalem-NablusUniversity-Nabluricho-Nablus qiliya-Nablus karm-Nablus

enin-Nablus alfit-Nablus

ubas-Nablus atBCP-Nablus meh BCP-NablusBridge BCP-Nabumiya-Hebron lehem-Hebron

mallah-Hebron erusalem-Hebron

hase public

es are Jerusalem, aza Strip.

parture along the city bus is

mand. For more

hat are with “*”

h

h lah allah

h lah mallah

s us

s blus

n

LLLiLLLLLLLLLLLLLLiLLLiLLLLLLLLLL

In Phas

4 Source


Line 36 Line 37 Line 38 Line 39 Line 40 Line 41 Line 42 ine 43* ine 44* ine 45*

Line 46 Line 47 Line 48 ine 49^


Line 53 Line 54 Line 55 ine 56* ine 57* ine 58*

Line 59 Line 60 ine 61* ine 62*

INTERCITY RAI

se 1, traffic vo

e: DB Bahn

IV.5 -13Road

HebHebHebHebHebHebHebHebHebHebHebHebHeb

East JeEast JeEast JeEast JeEast JeEast JeEast JeEast JeEast JeEast JeEast JeEast JeEast Je

GazaGazaGazaGaza

R

L LINES (4 STA

Figu

olume genera

d and Transportatio

bron bron bron bron bron bron bron bron bron bron bron bron bron rusalem rusalem rusalem rusalem rusalem rusalem rusalem rusalem rusalem rusalem rusalem rusalem rusalem a City a City a City a City

Rail-based Public

TIONS)

ure 3. Inter-city B

ated by public

on Master Plan | Pa

HeEast

EasEast EastEasEasEas

EasEas

EaEast

East JeEast

G

G

c Transport Supp

Ramallah-Al

Bus in Munich, G

c transport is


Hebron-Bir Hebron-JerHebron-Na

Hebron-QalqHebron-Tulk

Hebron-JeHebron-D

Hebron-DahHebron-SamHebron-Ya

Hebron-FreijaHebron-Jalame

ebron-Al Karama Jerusalem-Tarq

st Jerusalem-HeJerusalem-Betht Jerusalem-Ramst Jerusalem-Bir st Jerusalem-Jerst Jerusalem-Na

st Jerusalem-Qalqst Jerusalem-Tulkast Jerusalem-JeJerusalem-Freijaerusalem-Al JalaJerusalem-Al KaGaza City-Khan

Gaza City-RaGaza City-Bayt HGaza City-Rafa

ply

Bireh-Beitunia, BNablu

Germany4

split as follow

16

Zayt-Hebron richo-Hebron

ablus-Hebron qiliya-Hebron karm-Hebron

enin-Hebron ura-Hebron hriya-Hebron mu’a-Hebron atta-Hebron atBCP-Hebron eh BCP-Hebron Bridge BCP-Hebumiya-East Jerubron-East Jerusalehem-East Jeru

mallah-East JerusZayt-East Jerus

richo-East Jerusaablus-East Jerusaqiliya-East Jeruskarm-East Jerusenin-East JerusaatBCP-East Jeruameh BCP-E. Jearama Bridge BCYounis-Gaza Cit

afah-Gaza City Hanoun-Gaza Cih BCP-Gaza City

Bir Zayt Universitus

ws:

bron usalem alem

usalem salem alem alem alem salem salem lem

usalem rusalem

CP-E.J. ty

ty y

ty, Salfit,

3

Both rotranspo

• • •

Detaile

BU

Bus RaNablusBus Raconsistmainly service

3.3.2 Public

oad-based anort supply con

Inter-city BuBus Rapid TInter-city Ra

ed information

INTERCITY B

US RAPID TRAN

INTERCITY RAI

apid Transit s, with the aimapid Transit st in enhancedon arterial ro

es because of

IV.5 -14Road

Figure

c Transport S

nd rail-based snsists of:

uses network:Transit: 2 COail Lines: 14 S

n is presented

Ta

R

BUS LINES (62 L

NSIT (2 BRT COR

R

L LINES (14 STA

systems are m of creating ssystems, also d bus service oads with freqf their followin

d and Transportatio

4. PT Modal Spl

Supply in Pha

shared servic

: 62 LINES; RRIDORS;

STATIONS;

d in the follow

ab 4. Public Tra

Road-Based Publ

LINES)

RRIDORS):

Rail-based Publi

ATIONS)

proposed forseveral new uknown as BRservicing mu

quent stops alng main chara

5

Total Road

on Master Plan | Pa

lit (Road and Rai

ase 2 (2025 –

ces are propo

wing table.

ansport Supply fo

lic Transport Sup

S

1) Ramallah2

c Transport Sup

Ramallah-Al Nablus, Ba

Qalandiya/AQaba

r the hubs of Rurban corridorRT, are bus-bltiple origin anong the routeacteristics:

95%

5%

Total BRT T


il) in Phase 1 (%)

– 2031)

osed for Phase

or Phase 2

pply

See Table 3 for m

h-Al Bireh-Beitun

2) Nablus (total le

ply

Bireh-Beitunia, Bni Na’im, Bethele

Al Ram, Nablus Natiya, Jenin, and

Ramallah-Al Brs with enhanased mass trnd destinatione. BRT differ f

Total Rail

16

)

e 2. In this ph

more details

nia (total length: ength: 18 km)

Bir Zayt Universitehem, East JeruNorth, Tubas, ZaAl Jalameh BCP

Bireh-Beitunianced mobility ransit system.n pairs, whichfrom traditiona

hase public

18 km)

ty, Salfit, salem, babida,

P

a and conditions. . They h operating al local bus

• • • •

For moCase o Two nethese cCorridopropos

5 FeigenCentury,6 BRT hescale. 7 Source

Dedicated gTraffic signaDedicated laExpedited fa

ore details abof European B

etworks of BRcorridors withors that links tsed for Ramal

Figur

baum, B., Bus R, Reason Foundaeadway is to be d

e: Institute for Tra

IV.5 -15Road

guideway systal prioritizatioanes at intersare collection

out BRT systBRT”).

RT corridors o short headwthem to the cllah-Al Bireh-B

Figu

re 6. BRT Corrido

Rapid Transit andation, 2014. defined accordin

ansportation and

d and Transportatio

tem; n; sections, and;n.5

tems, refer to:

of 18 km eachway6. New railwcity centers. TBeitunia and

ure 5. Bus Rapid

ors Scheme for R

d Managed Lanes

ng to ad hoc in-de

Development Po

on Master Plan | Pa

;

: “The LINE G

h are proposeway stations

The following sfor Nablus Hu

d Transit in Quito

Ramallah-Al Bire

s: Low-Cost High

epth travel dema

olicy


G in Strasbour

ed; multiple-caare included schemes illusub.

o, Ecuador7

eh-Beitunia Hub a

h-Quality Transp

and studies, to be

16

rg: A Success

ar vehicles ruin the new BR

strate the BRT

and Nablus Hub

portation Solution

e carried out at m

sful Study-

n along RT T Corridors

ns for 21st

macro-urban

IV.5 -16Roadd and Transportatio

on Master Plan | Paalestine – 30/09/20116

THE LINE G IN MAIN FEATUR Total Length: 5Patronage ServOperating TimeHeadway: everTotal travel timFleet CharacteVehicle Type: MUrban OperatinInvestment CosEquipment: 12 PROJECT TIM 2011-2012 : re2012 : public h2013 : start of wend of 2013 : e

N STRASBOURG

RES

5.2 km (80% withvice: 15,000 peoe: from 5:15 AM ry 6 mins during e: 14 mins ristics: 11 multi-cMercedes-Benz Cng Speed: 20 kmsts (excluding veStations, 1 P+R

MELINE

gulatory consultaearing works

entry into service

Line G multi-c

IV.5 -17Road

G: A SUCCESSF

h exclusive lanesople (8,000 inhabtill Midnight, 7 dapeak time; every

car vehicles withCitaro G (485,00

m/h ehicles: 4,8 Euro/, 1 Bicycle Parki

ation and launch

.

car vehicle stopp

d and Transportatio

FUL STUDY-CA

) bitants, 6,000 emays/weak y 8 mins during d

a capacity of 1200 Euro)

/Km ng, 1 Car-Sharin

of preliminary st

ping at one of 12

on Master Plan | Pa

ASE OF EUROPE

mployees, 1,500 s

day-non-peak tim

20 passengers

ng Station, 1 Bike

tudies

2 stations located


EAN BRT

students)

me; every 30 mins

e-Sharing Station

d its route; source

16

s during night

n

e: Mercedes Bennz

BRIEF DESCR Line G has bepatronage of 10of tramlines. Ali.e.: priority at quick and easyLine G was con Improve public Provide better business park. Provide direct connections in Help improve a The project hapedestrian syst

THE RESULTS After only two yinauguration incustomers. Nowhow public tranwith a focus on Sources: http://www.en.strhttp://www.cts-strhttps://fr.wikipedihttp://www.mercebenz.de/content/ghttps://www.merc

RIPTION

en operating sin0,000 pax/year, lthough Line G isintersections reg

y boarding also fonceived and des

transport conneconnections to

and frequent cthe railway statio

air quality and red

as the added advtem, in line with a

S

years of planningn November 201wadays, Strasbonsport projects cn high quality and

asbourg.eu/en/tranrasbourg.eu/fr/la-cta.org/wiki/Ligne_Gedes-germany/mpc/mpc_cedes-benz.com/en

IV.5 -18Road

nce 2013, linkingLine G is part of s a road-based pgulated with traffor PRM. igned in order to

ections in and outthe CNRS rese

connections betwon/city centre seduce noise levels

vantage of proviaccessibility stan

Line G

g and one year o3. Providing a ra

ourg is a prime ecan be used as ad excellence in d

nsport-and-environmts/projets-dextensio

G_du_BHNS_de_St

_germany_websiten/mercedes-benz/v

d and Transportatio

g the cities of Stf the wider publicpublic transport sfic lights; off-boa

accomplish the

t of Cronenbourgearch and highe

ween the centractor. s through the use

ding enhanced rndards.

G exclusive lane

of construction wapid and comfor

example of how tan urban projectesign can lead to

ment/innovation-ledon/ligne-g-bus-a-hatrasbourg

e/de/home_mpc/buvehicles/buses/citar

on Master Plan | Pa

trasbourg, Schiltc transport netwoservice, it works rd fare collection

following princip

g, especially the er education ce

al railway statio

e of public transp

road layouts and

s; source: Merce

works, the 5km lortable transport cto adapt BRT to . It shows how tho successful bus

d-projects/bus-rapiaut-niveau-de-servi

s/home/consulting/ro-g-ngt-bus-rapid-t


ingheim and Bisork that is operateas a tram, with w

n; stations’ layou

ple objectives:

Cité Nucléaire antre and to the

n and the secto

port rather than p

d new cycle trac

edes Benz

ng Line G has bconnection, the the context of Ehinking about BRs-based public tra

d-transit/ ice/

/bus_rapid_transit/transit-for-strasbou

16

shheim. Conceived by CTS and iwhich it shares mut designed at le

nd planned housEspace Europé

ors and offer a

private cars.

cks. It also provi

een operating subuses have beeuropean cities, wRT in a holistic aansport.

solutions/strassbururg-video/

ed for an expecs mainly compos

many of its featurvel with the bus

sing estates. éen de l'Entrepr

a greater choice

des a more sec

uccessfully sinceen well-acceptedwhile demonstratand innovative w

rg.html

cted sed res, for

rise

e of

ure

e its by ting

way,

In Phas

3

Both rotranspo

• • •

Detaile

BU

se 2, traffic vo

3.3.3 Public



ed information

INTERCITY B

US RAPID TRAN

INTERCITY RAI

IV.5 -19Road

olume genera

Figure

c Transport S

nd rail-based snsists of:


n is presented

Ta

R

BUS LINES (62 L

NSIT (4 BRT COR

R

L LINES (27 STA

4%

T

d and Transportatio

ated by public

7. PT Modal Sp

Supply in Pha

shared servic


STATIONS.

d in the follow

ab 5. Public Tra

Road-Based Publ

LINES)

RRIDORS):

Rail-based Publi

ATIONS)

18%

Total Road T

on Master Plan | Pa

c transport is

plit (Road and Ra

ase 3 (2032 –

ces are propo

wing table.

ansport Supply fo

lic Transport Sup

S

1) Ramallah2

3) East Jeru

4

c Transport Sup


Qalandiya/AQabatiya, JeArafat Int’l Ai

Port, GazaHebron, New

Total BRT T


split as follow

ail) in Phase 2 (%

– 2037)

osed for Phase

or Phase 3

pply

See Table 3 for m

h-Al Bireh-Beitun

2) Nablus (total leusalem (total len

(total length) Hebron (total le

ply


Al Ram, Nablus Nnin, and Al Jalamrport, Khan Youn

a City, Bayt Hanow West Bank Int’l

78%

Total Rail

16

ws:

%)

e 3.In this pha

more details

nia (total length: ength: 18 km) ngth: 9 km) +Bethh: 9 km) ength: 18 km)

Bir Zayt Universitehem, East JeruNorth, Tubas, Zameh BCP, Rafah nis, Al Nuseirat, oun, Tarqumiya-IAirport, Jericho,

ase public

18 km)

hlehem

ty, Salfit, salem, babida, BCP, Y.

New Int’l Idhna, Damyeh

Two neJerusaCorridopropos

8East Je(total len

etworks of BRalem+Bethleheors that links tsed for East J

rusalem hub is hngth: 18 km) are

IV.5 -20Road

RT corridors oem8, and onethem to the cerusalem+Be

Figure 8. BRT

herein consideredproposed: one in

d and Transportatio

of 18 km eache in Hebron. Ncity centers. Tethlehem and

Corridors Schem

d as the conurban East Jerusalem

on Master Plan | Pa

Br

h are proposeNew railway sThe following s

Hebron.

me for East Jerus

ation including alsm and one in Beth


ridge BCP, Tell A

ed: one in Easstations are inschemes illus

salem Hub and B

so Bethlehem. Thlehem.

16

Al Bayda BCP.

st cluded in the

strate the BRT

Bethlehem

Two different BRT

new BRT T Corridors

T Corridors

In Phasse 3, traffic vo

IV.5 -21Road

F

olume genera

Figure

4%

T

d and Transportatio

Figure 9. BRT Co

ated by public

10. PT Modal Sp

35%

Total Road T

on Master Plan | Pa

orridors Scheme

c transport is

plit (Road and Ra

Total BRT T


for Hebron Hub

split as follow

ail) in Phase 3 (%

61%

Total Rail

16

ws:

%)

3

Both rotranspo

• • •

Detaile

B

Finallyschem

3.3.4 Public



ed information

INTERCITY B

US RAPID TRAN

INTERCITY RAI

, another netwe illustrates th

IV.5 -22Road

c Transport S

nd rail-based snsists in:


n is presented

Ta

R

BUS LINES (62 L

NSIT (5 BRT CO

R

L LINES (33 STA

work of BRT che BRT Corri

Figu

d and Transportatio

Supply in Pha

shared servic


STATIONS.

d in the follow

ab 6. Public Tra

Road-Based Publ

LINES)

ORRIDOR):

Rail-based Publi

ATIONS)

corridors of 1dors propose

ure 11. BRT Corri

on Master Plan | Pa

ase 4 (2038 –

ces are propo

wing table.

ansport Supply fo

lic Transport Sup

S

1) Ramallah2

3) East Jeru

45

c Transport Sup


Qalandiya/AQabatiya, JeArafat Int’l Ai

Port, GazaHebron, New

Bridge BCPFaroun BCP

8 km is propoed for Gaza C

ridors Scheme fo


– 2045)

osed for Phase

or Phase 4

pply

See Table 3 for m

h-Al Bireh-Beitun2) Nablus (total leusalem (total len

(total length) Hebron (total le5) Gaza (total len

ply


Al Ram, Nablus Nnin, and Al Jalamrport, Khan Youn

a City, Bayt Hanow West Bank Int’l

, Tell Al Bayda BP, Azzun, Bayt Ib

Kafr Ra

osed for GazaCity

or Gaza City Hub

16

e 4. In this ph

more details

nia (total length: ength: 18 km) gth: 9 km) + Beth

h: 9 km) ength: 18 km) ngth: 18 km)

Bir Zayt Universitehem, East JeruNorth, Tubas, Zameh BCP, Rafah nis, Al Nuseirat, oun, Tarqumiya-IAirport, Jericho,

BCP; Qalqiliya, Tba, Bal’a/ Anabtaa’l.

a City. The fo

hase public

18 km)

hlehem

ty, Salfit, salem, babida, BCP, Y.

New Int’l Idhna, Damyeh

Tulkarm/ a, Arab/

llowing

In Phas

The derelevanthe evodischa The figvolume

se 4, traffic vo

evelopment ofnt shift in modolution of rail rging road ne

gures presente and the tren

IV.5 -23Road

olume genera

Figu

f multi-modal dal split, whertransport netw

etwork (from 9

ed in the follond of rail-base

43%

T

d and Transportatio

ated by public

ure 12. PT Modal

public transpre rail-based pwork (from 5%95% in Phase

owing page shed public tran

4%

%

Total Road T

on Master Plan | Pa

c transport is

Split (Road and

port network (public transpo% in Phase 1 e 1to 53% in P

how the trendsport volume

Total BRT T


split as follow

Rail) in Phase 4

road and rail-ort volume incto 43% in Ph

Phase 4).

d of road-base.

53%

Total Rail

16

ws:

4 (%)

-based) entaicreases, accohase 4), hence

ed public tran

ls a ording to e

sport

Phase

688729.6

0.0

Phase 1A

e 1Phase 2

IV.5 -24Road

Figure 1

816850

Phase 1

Phase 3

d and Transportatio

13. Road-Based P

Based PT

0.886

41295.5

Phase 2

Phase

on Master Plan | Pa

PT Traffic Volum

Traffic Volume T

69772.9

Phase 3

e 4


me Trend (2015 –

Trend (2015 – 20

830708.8

149412

3 Phas

16

2045) (pax)

045) (pax)

830708

2.3

458180.4

se 4

ail-

.8

Figure 144.R

3

The prealso a relationDevelopublic tdevelolocatedTODis This foand entranspo

• • • • •

The demulti-muse deBank apractisoutcom

• • • •

•

In ordepresen

9The defTransit-Oand coremaking i

3.4 Public T

esentation of brief descriptn, along with opment, commtransportationpment typica

d in both city clocated near

orm of developnhances mobiortation syste

Ensure tranIncrease deCreate pedeMake each Manage par

evelopment ofmodal transpoevelopments, and Gaza Strie capable to

mes:

Increase “loBoost transProvide a ricGenerate reexisting resCreate a se

er to better unnted.

finition advancedOriented Develope commercial aret convenient for

IV.5 -25Road

Transport a

the proposaltion of public tits good effecmonly known n investmentslly focused wcenters and sstations to m

pment utilisesility for local c

ems, the follow

sit to supportensity around estrian-orientestation a cenrking, bus and

f the proposeort network enboth in alreadp, to be urbanallow for a so

ocation efficieit ridership anch mix of houevenue for theidents, and;

ense of place.

nderstand wha

d by architect andpment is a mixedea. TODs mix resresidents and em

d and Transportatio

and Urban D

for public tratransport’s rocts, is shown tas TOD.9In th

s and land-usithin 400m rasuburban sett

make transit cos existing infracommunities.Twing objective

t land uses; transit stationed design; ter for activityd vehicular tra

d public transnvisioned by Ndy urbanised nised. On thi

ound and effic

ncy” so peopnd minimize trusing, shoppine public and p

at TOD is, the

d planner Peter Cd-use communitysidential, retail, omployees to trave

on Master Plan | Pa

Developmen

ansport in Weole in urban dethrough a foche most basic

se practices: itadius of a trantings. onvenient forastructure, opTo integrate laes are identifi

ns;

y; and affic.

sport networkNTMP will creareas, to be eis concern, TOcient territoria

le can walk araffic; ng and transpprivate sector

e study-case

Calthorpe is typicy within an averaoffice, open spacel by transit, bicy


nts.

st Bank and Gevelopment pcus on the so-c terms, TODt is a walkable

nsit station or

people and eptimises use oand use deveed:

k and, at a wideate precious expanded, anOD is herein l planning, ai

nd bike and t

portation choicrs and provide

of Almere, in

cal and conveys ge 2,000-foot wae, and public use

ycle, foot, or car”

16

Gaza Strip coplanning. This-called Transi is a strategy e mixed-use fany public bu

encourage ridof the transit nelopment with

der scale, of topportunities

nd in new zonconsidered aming at the fo

take transit;

ces; e value for ne

the Netherlan

the basic themealking distance oes in a walkable (Calthorpe 1993

omprises s mutual it Oriented to integrate

form of us network,

dership. network

h public

the entire s for land-nes of West s a best ollowing

ew and

nds, is

s of TOD: “A f a transit stop environment,

3: 56).

TRANSIT ORIE MAIN FEATUR Location: The NDate: 1976 TowLand Use: comType of TransitDistance betwePedestrian Con THE CITY OF A Almere is one oand founded thsystem and a sAlmere is centrHague, Rotterdtwo internationindispensably sCurrently, Alme ALMERE’S TR All Almere is accordance witis implemented

ENTED DEVELO

RES

Netherlands wn Foundation; 2

mmercial/employmt: Busway –Bus Reen Transit Stationnectivity: very g

ALMERE

of The Netherlanhirty-seven yearseparated bus-warally located in thdam) in the westnal airports, the strategic locationere is one of the

RANSIT-ORIENT

a transit-orienteth land-use pland in order to serv

IV.5 -26Road

OPMENT IN ALM

2010 BRT Netwoment center – ReRapid Transit on: Optimal walk

good

nds’ famous reclars ago. This neway network that a

he Randstad cont of the Netherlanport of Amsterd

n for business defastest growing c

TED DEVELOPM

ed development,ning. In 2010 a ne the city of Alme

A

d and Transportatio

MERE, THE NET

ork Implementatioesidential – Park

king distance (ran

aimed land projew land provided are deeply interwurbation, the urbnds. Being a param and a pleth

evelopment and ucities in Europe,

MENT

where bus repnew Bus Rapid Tere at local scale

lmere BRT Netw

on Master Plan | Pa

THERLANDS

on ing

nging between 2

ects lying on artifurban designers

woven throughouban region contart of the metropoora of railway aunlimited busineswith over 195,00

presents the fulcTransit starts, to e, covering all the

work Map; source


00 m and 700 m

ficial islands, locs with the oppor

ut the town. ining the four ma

olitan area of Amand motorway coss opportunities.00 inhabitants an

crum of the entsubstitute the fo

e districts of Alm

e: fff.nl

16

m)

ated 25km northrtunity to build b

ajor cities (Amstesterdam, Almere

onnections. This

nd 14,500 busine

tire transport neormer and regula

mere Municipality.

heast of Amsterdboth a normal ro

erdam, Utrecht, Te is in the vicinitys makes Almere

esses.

etwork designedar bus system. B.

am oad

The y of an

d in BRT

Almere’s BRT throughout the allowed along tsignaling at all other types trafwith passengeincorporated in

Sources: http://schrijven.ovhttp://www.fff.nl/dhttp://www.spoorrobthart%20001_http://humantranshttps://english.almhttps://www.goog

is entirely provinetwork, with a

the busways. BRtraffic intersectio

ffic allows busesers boarding andnto urban fabric.

The Centr

vcentraal.nl/foto.phdata/upload/Connexbeeld.nl/sites/defau

_T.jpg sit.org/2010/10/aimmere.nl/ gle.it/maps/place/A

IV.5 -27Road

ided with dedicadistance ranging

RT dedicated lanons, even at vers to run the whold alighting. Fina

ral Road Axis in A

hp?foto=almere/kaaxxion_5-Gooi-Vechult/files/images/BS

mere-netherlands-as

lmere

d and Transportatio

ated lanes alongg between 500 anes do not end wry central and higle system with nlly, buswaysare

Almere; bus stop

art.gif htstreek_2014.pdfM-2008-BB-BRBSM

s-bus-oriented-dev

on Master Plan | Pa

g which buses mand 700m. Privatwhen meeting a jgh-traffic ones. Tear-perfect reliaplanned and d

ps are highlighted

M_station%20Alme

velopment.html


move at moderate car traffic is ajunction, on the cThe absence of bility; indeed, theesigned in full c

d in blue; source

ere%20Centrum%2

16

ate speed and sbsentand bicyclecontrary buses bany interferencee only source of coordination with

e: google maps

20De%20Collectie-

stop relatively ofe circulation arebenefit of pro-acte between BRT a

delay is a problh the aim of be

-

ften not tive and em

eing

road and transportation masterplan · road and transportation masterplan palestine ta 2012013 ps 00...

Documents