shouhardo care bangladesh evaluation fy2009
DESCRIPTION
SHOUHARDO CARE Bangladesh Evaluation FY2009Bethann Witcher Cottrell, CARECORE Group Spring Meeting, April 30, 2010TRANSCRIPT
USAID Office of Food for PeaceMulti-Year Assistance Programs/Development Assistance Programs
SHOUHARDOCARE BangladeshEvaluation FY2009
Bethann Witcher Cottrell, PresenterFaheem Khan, Project ManagerAnnual CORE Group ConferenceApril, 2010
GoalSustainably reduce chronic & transitory food insecurity of most disadvantaged &
hard-to-reach 400,000 HHs in 18 districts by 2009 (Char, Haor, Coast, Slum)
GoalSustainably reduce chronic & transitory food insecurity of most disadvantaged &
hard-to-reach 400,000 HHs in 18 districts by 2009 (Char, Haor, Coast, Slum)
North Char
Mid CharHaor
Coastal
“I misbehaved and my father told me he would take me to the mainland and put me on a ‘Rickshaw’!”
“I was alone when my child was born - I had to cut the cord myself!”
Goals / Objectives Leading to Higher PlateausGoals / Objectives Leading to Higher Plateaus
SHOUHARDO SOs
SO1: Entitlement & Economic Growth
SO2: Health, Hygiene, Nutrition
SO3: Women Empowerment
SO4: Disaster Management
Economic Growth & Agriculture Development
Democracy
Education & Training
Population & Health
USAID
MDG 1: Eradicate Poverty & Hunger
MDG 2: Universal Primary Education
MDG 3: Women Empowerment
MDG 7: Environmental Sustainability
MDGs
Environment
Disaster Management
Take time to “understand” the context
Well Being Analysis
Community Maps
Community Action Plans
Recognize “needs” are
different!
Focus on3
TiersHousehold
Community
Service Provider
Strengthening“Resiliency”to Disasters
Disaster VolunteersRisk & Resource Maps
Mound Protection Walls
Plinth Raising
Flood Shelter
Early Warning System
Coverage of all 4 regions (32 villages / slums)Coverage of all 4 regions (32 villages / slums)
Unions defined by random selection villagesUnions defined by random selection villages
Unions with key interventions prioritizedUnions with key interventions prioritized
Quantitative data collection from 3,600 HHs (in Quantitative data collection from 3,600 HHs (in line with baseline) line with baseline)
Final Evaluation – process………Final Evaluation – process………
OVERALL IMPACT………………….OVERALL IMPACT………………….
SHOUHARDOSHOUHARDO
44% increase in adequate food provision 44% increase in adequate food provision (5 to7.5months)(5 to7.5months)
33% reduction in stunting33% reduction in stunting
16% increase in dietary diversity16% increase in dietary diversity
128% increase in income128% increase in income
Proven links between each one of these Proven links between each one of these achievements and women’s empowermentachievements and women’s empowerment
MoreNutritious
Food
HigherIncome
BetterServices
BehaviourChangeLess
UnderweightLess
Diarrhea
DietDiversification
HandWashing
BreastFeeding
LessMigration
LessAdvance Labor
LessNon-Formal
Loans MoreAssets
AntenatalCare
Iron/FolicAcid
VitaminA
Immunization
Less“Stunting”
BetterServices
AntenatalCare
Iron/FolicAcid
VitaminA
Immunization
At least 3 antenatal visits- Baseline: 16.4%- Endline: 58.6%- Difference: + 258%
More food intake than usual- Baseline: 6.4%- Endline: 53.7%- Difference: + 744.5%
More daytime rest than usual- Baseline: 25.2%- Endline: 45.9%- Difference: + 82%
- Baseline: 27.8%- Endline: 80.9%- Difference: + 191.3%
- Baseline: 9.7%- Endline: 79%- Difference: + 712.2%
- Baseline: 68.9%- Endline: 84%- Difference: + 22%
BehaviourChange
DietDiversification
HandWashing
BreastFeeding
- Baseline: 89.4%- Endline: 92.7%- Difference: + 3.7%
- Baseline: 81.1%- Endline: 98.7%- Difference: + 21.7%
5.1
5.4
5.6
6.3
6.1
6.4
5.9
5.0
5.3
5.5
5.8
6.0
6.3
6.5
February2006
(Baseline)
Jan/Feb2007
July/Aug2007
Jan/Feb2008
July/Aug2008
Jan/Feb2009
August2009
(Endline)
- Difference: + 14.8%
HigherIncome
LessMigration
LessAdvance Labor
LessNon-Formal
Loans MoreAssets
- Baseline: 42.9%- Endline: 19.6%- Difference: - 54.2%
- Baseline: 15.4%- Endline: 3.9%- Difference: - 74.6%
- Baseline: 48.8%- Endline: 21.4%- Difference: - 56.1%
- Baseline: 697- Endline: 3,356- Difference: + 381.5%
Income in BDT- Baseline: 1,487- Endline: 3,390- Difference: + 128%
Income Sources- Baseline: 1.32- Endline: 1.64- Difference: + 24%
MoreNutritious
Food
LessUnderweight
LessDiarrhea
- Baseline: 22.9%- Endline: 9.1%- Difference: - 60.1%
- Baseline: 55.9%- Endline: 44.2%- Difference: - 20.9%
HHs with 3 square meals/day- Baseline: 32.2%- Endline: 74.1%- Difference: + 130%
HHs with continual stored food- Baseline: 10.3%- Endline: 52%- Difference: + 405.1%
5.2
5.7
6.0
6.2
6.86.9
7.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
February2006
(Baseline)
Jan/Feb2007
July/Aug2007
Jan/Feb2008
July/Aug2008
Jan/Feb2009
August2009
(Endline)
- Difference + 44.1%
Less“Stunting”
StuntingStunting BaselineBaseline EndlineEndline DifferenceDifference
N. CharN. Char 50.9%50.9% 35.1%35.1% - 31.0%- 31.0%
M. CharM. Char 49.4%49.4% 40.5%40.5% - 17.9%- 17.9%
HaorHaor 59.0%59.0% 41.7%41.7% - 29.4%- 29.4%
CoastCoast 43.9%43.9% 26.2%26.2% - 40.2%- 40.2%
GirlsGirls 52.3%52.3% 33.6%33.6% - 35.7%- 35.7%
BoysBoys 51.5%51.5% 38.8%38.8% - 24.6%- 24.6%
UrbanUrban 48.2%48.2% 39.0%39.0% - 18.9%- 18.9%
RuralRural 52.0%52.0% 36.3%36.3% - 30.3%- 30.3%
OverallOverall 51.9%51.9% 36.4%36.4% - 29.9%- 29.9%
Severe Stunting- Baseline: 20.7%- Endline: 12.4%- Difference: - 40.1%
Thank You