stelara article 0416
TRANSCRIPT
J&J/Janssen’s Stelara stirs uptakedebate given wavering refractoryneed in Crohn’s, niche potential –experts
J&J/Janssen’s Stelara stirs uptakedebate given wavering refractoryneed in Crohn’s, niche potential –experts
Download our mobile app!
Related Articles by Drug
Related Articles by Company
Published 2016-05-05 Proprietary Intelligence
J&J/Janssen’s Stelara for Crohn’s facesexpected high pricing and payer priorauthorisation hurdles, possible co-paysprograms – experts
Reimbursement scenarios differ between IV and SC formulations
Two anti-TNF failures may be prior authorisation requirement
Acceptable out-of-pocket payments vary between patients
Johnson and Johnson (NYSE:JNJ)/Janssen Biotech's Stelara (ustekinumab) for Crohn's
disease (CD) has expected high pricing that could post obstacles to US payer reimbursement,
experts said. Strict prior authorisation (PA) requirements could be prompted as welll by
Stelara's anticipated nonemergency and anticipated refractory/failed anti-TNF therapy
labelling, they added.
Yet, expected patient assistance programmes (PAPs) may ease out-of-pocket payouts, some
said.
Stelara is a human interleukin-12 and -13 antagonist, approved for adults with moderate-to-
severe plaque psoriasis involving large areas of the body whom may benefit from systemic or
phototherapy, as well as adults with active psoriatic arthritis.
On 21 April, this news service reported promising FDA and EMA approval forecasts for CD
despite underwhelming efficacy, yet an uncertain refractory patient need provoked dubious
uptake prospects. Analysts expect an FDA and EMA verdict in 3Q16.
Analysts predict peak sales forecasts of up to USD 800m.
In anticipation of Stelara's potential FDA approval in CD, Janssen will ensure Stelara's broad
accessibility by keeping the net cost in line with current biologic CD therapies, said a company
spokesperson. Anti-TNF therapy such as AbbVie's (NYSE:ABBV) Humira (adalimumab) is CD
standard-of-care.
High price projections
High pricing, like other biologics, will likely be Stelara's greatest reimbursement hurdle, said Dr
Raymond Cross, investigator and director, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Programme, University
of Maryland Medical Centre, Baltimore. Stelara's CD pricing is unlikely to undercut that of its
expensive current psoriasis indication, added Cross. According to public information, Stelara's
psoriasis price is around USD 9,000 for one syringe; it is administered as an initial dose, then
four weeks later and every subsequent 12 weeks. Although pricing will likely be high, CD and
psoriasis are both debilitating, inflammatory conditions, supporting similar reimbursement
pathways, said Dr Michael Epstein, gastroenterologist, Epstein Associates, Annapolis,
Maryland.
Due to their comparable Phase III trial participants, Stelara will likely be priced similarly to
Takeda Pharmaceutical's (TYO:4502) Entyvio (vedolizumab), said Peter Rheinstein, president,
Severn Health Solutions, Baltimore, Maryland. Entyvio is a CD biologic approved for use in
patients failing at least one common treatment, including anti-TNFs. Its public price is around
USD 25,000 for five vials.
Unlike Stelara's subcutaneous (SC) psoriasis formulation, it is intravenous (IV) during CD's
induction phase, preventing at-home administration, said Rheinstein. He added, however, this
may not negatively influence its formulary tier positioning, which will likely be similar to
Enytvio's. Entyvio is categorised as tier 4 or a specialty tier, usually reserved for the most
expensive drugs, according to public information.
Yet, Stelara is SC during its CD maintenance phase, noted Anita Burrell, founder of her New
Jersey-based eponymous consulting firm. The ongoing Phase III IM-UNITI study
(NCT01369355) includes five SC arms, according to ClinicalTrials.gov.
Whilst Stelara's CD IV induction phase price may vary according to patient weight, its
formulation likely supports higher pricing over SC maintenance, said Burrell. UNITI-1 and -2
administered Stelara at 130mg and approximately 6mg/kg doses.
Prior authorisation expected
Further to potential pricing hurdles, PA is another expected issue, said Burrell, Rheinstein and
Rhonda Greenapple, founder, reimbursement consultancy Access First, Bernardsville, New
Jersey. Any nonemergency drug labelled for use after a refractory or failed treatment
response prompts PA possibility, Rheinstein explained.
If reasonably priced with a broad label, payers may recommend Stelara's early administration
View Contacts
View Contacts
View Contacts
View Contacts
*Johnson & Johnson
Abbott Laboratories
Abbvie Inc.
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
*Stelara
Entyvio
Humira
Product Development
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
USA
NCT01369355
Cytokine Suppressor
Interleukin-1 (IL-1) Blocker
Strong evidence
Email Analyst
Company
Drug(s)
Topic
Indications
Country
Clinical Trials
Mechanism(s)
Intelligence Grade
BioPharm Insight - Powered by Infinata (www.biopharminsight.com)
1 of 2
About Alexandra Thompson
Email the journalist team at [email protected]
after anti-TNF therapy refraction or failure, Cross said. Such labelling is unlikely, however, as it
is expected to mirror the narrow patient groups recruited into Stelara's Phase III trials, Cross
added. This news service previously reported Stelara's label will likely indicate refractory or
failed anti-TNF therapy patients as included in Stelara's Phase III UNITI-1 and -2 trials.
Assuming patient anti-TNF intolerance is predictable ahead of treatment, intolerant patients
may be prescribed Stelara first-line, said Greenapple. Cross added, however, diagnostic tests
are insufficiently developed to preassess patient anti-TNF suitability. Patients may be required
to fail at least two anti-TNF therapies before Stelara considerations, said Burrell and
Greenapple.
PA requirements may also be stricter for Stelara than Entyvio due to concerns surrounding the
former's infection risk, said Burrell. One case of Listeria meningitis infection was reported in
Stelara's Phase III UNITI-1 6mg/kg cohort.
Furthermore, anti-TNF refraction numbers likely exceed anti-TNF intolerance, suggesting PA
may favour refractory over intolerant patients initially, said Burrell.
Additional to PA, Stelara's expected steep pricing will likely prompt step edits and quantity
management- patient reassessment a year after treatment refusal, said Burrell.
This news service previously reported physicians may prescribe other anti-TNF therapies over
Stelara due to greater comfort with the former drug class. Postmarket comparative efficacy
trials should assess Stelara's effectiveness relative to second-line anti-TNF therapies, as well
as whether Stelara could mitigate surgery need; however, the latter may be difficult to
demonstrate, said Greenapple. Such trials will unlikely occur due to their cost, long duration
and often strict inclusion criteria hindering recruitment, said Cross.
Co-pay assistance anticipated
Referring to public information, Stelara in psoriasis offers patient co-pay assistance,
supporting a similar outcome for the agent during CD maintenance, said Burrell. Janssen will
offer a number of patient support programs to ensure Stelara's broad accessibility and
affordability, the spokesperson added.
The amount patients will likely be willing to pay out-of-pocket for Stelara for CD varies
according to income and co-pay assistance, said Cross and Epstein. Most will be unwilling to
pay USD 1,000 monthly, however, said Cross. Yet, Epstein argued, CD's unmet need supports
Stelara's use regardless of price. Poorly uncontrolled CD is also expensive, leading to surgery,
repeated hospitalisation and IV feeding, he added.
Psoriasis patients are eligible for manufacturer coupons, allowing co-pays down to zero for the
first six doses, which may also apply in CD, said Burrell, referring to public information. She
added, however, Stelara's CD IV induction dose is a one-off treatment, whilst its SC
maintenance dose is being trialled at eight or 12 weeks, in contrast to psoriasis' every four
weeks, therefore patients could overall pay more for Stelara psoriasis treatment than CD, she
added.
To overcome Stelara's potential pricing hurdles, J&J/Janssen Biotech will likely offer use
incentives, including sample distribution and drug administration training, said Cross.
J&J has a market cap of USD 309.7b.
by Alexandra Thompson in London
© Infinata 2014 Site Map For assistance call BioPharm Insight Support at +1 866 501 6948 or +44 (0) 203 741 1038
2 of 2