strategies for accelerating student success :
DESCRIPTION
Strategies for Accelerating Student Success :. Findings & Recommendations from the Assessment of the Evidence Series. Thomas Bailey Community College Research Center Teachers College/Columbia University RP Group Conference April 14, 2011. Assessment of Evidence Series. Focused on: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Strategies for Accelerating Student Success:
Thomas BaileyCommunity College Research Center
Teachers College/Columbia University
RP Group Conference
April 14, 2011
Findings & Recommendations fromthe Assessment of the Evidence Series
Assessment of Evidence Series
• Focused on: – Developmental education (assessment & placement,
acceleration programs, contextualization of basic skills instruction, innovative math pedagogy)
– Non-academic supports– Program & institutional structures– Online learning– Organizational improvement
• Impacts: Best-quality quantitative research• Implications: Qualitative research, theoretical
literature, practitioner input
Findings & ImplicationsArea Findings / Implications Author(s)Developmental Placement Testing
Tests weakly predictive; little connection between student need & treatment.
Kathy Hughes and Judith Scott-Clayton
Developmental Acceleration Many promising models; for which students? Role of (improved?) pedagogy unclear.
Nikki Edgecombe
Contextualization & Innovative Math Pedagogy
Very promising but not widely used. . . why not? Michelle Hodara and Dolores Perin
Non-AcademicSupport
Mechanisms: creating social relationships, clarifying aspirations & commitment, developing college know-how, and addressing conflicting life demands.
Melinda Karp
Program & Inst. Structure Institutional complexity may adversely affect student decision-making.
Judith Scott-Clayton
Online learning Completion is lower (after controlling for just about everything).
Shanna Jaggars
Organizational Improvement CCs tend to be weak in organizational practices that promote high performance
Davis Jenkins
Organizational Improvement (establishment in programs of study)
To improve completion rates, ccs need to ensure that students get into a college-level program of study as quickly as possible. Most ccs not well organized to do that.
Davis Jenkins
An overarching theme
• Organizational improvement was a stand-alone topic.
• Over time, realized it was integral to all the topics
• To substantially improve:– developmental education– online & face-to-face pedagogy– support provision
• . . . the whole institution needs to be engaged and focused on improving student outcomes.
Four Broad Findings & Recommendations
• #1: Complexity & Structure
• #2: Faculty Engagement
• #3: Academic Alignment & Assessment
• #4: Continuous Improvement
Complexity & Structure• All humans make bad choices in unduly complex
environments.
• College can seem complex and confusing to students, due to:– A bewildering array of options– Lack of information integration – Unnecessary bureaucracy– Tools convenient / inexpensive to the college
E3, no C3,exit
R=3
3
2
1
GK
Exit withoutever enrolling
C3, exit
C3, E2, no C2, exit
C3, C2,exit
C3, C2, E1,no C1, exit
C3, C2, C1, exit
C3, C2, C1E GK, exit
No E3, skip to 2
No E3, skip to 1
No E3, skip to GK
E2, no C2,skip to 1
E1, no C1,skip to GK
C2, skip to GK
E2, no C2, skip to GK
E3, no C3, E2
E3, no C3, E GK
E3, no C3, E1C3, skip to 1
C3, skip to GK
C GKNot enroll, skip
Enroll, then skip
Complete, then skip
Timing of Entry into a Program of Study
Complexity & Structure
• Recommendation: Simplify the structures and bureaucracies that students must navigate.
Complexity & Structure
• Recommendation: Simplify the structures and bureaucracies that students must navigate.– Does not require restricting choice
Complexity & Structure
• Recommendation: Simplify the structures and bureaucracies that students must navigate.– Does not require restricting choice– Re-examine policies, practices, programs,
services:• Why are they in place?• Are they serving their intended function?• Are they aligned with the goal of student success?
Complexity & Structure
• Re-examine policies, practices, services...– Form cross-functional teams of faculty,
student services, staff administrators– Map out student’s experience from first
contact; where & why are students encountering frustration and confusion?
– Develop protocols of recommended practice to support student success at each stage of their experience in college
Faculty Engagement• Substantial organizational improvement
requires strong employee involvement.
• In CCs, student success goals can be hampered by:– lack of faculty/staff engagement– large part-time workforce– organizational silos
Faculty Engagement• Organizations with strong employee
involvement in reform:– Ensure employees have deep understanding
of goals and methods of reform– Empower employees as part of reform– Encourage staff to work in cross-functional
teams– Create challenging yet meaningful goals– Present evidence of successes
Faculty Engagement• Student supports:
– Resources are limited– Yet students underutilize
• Potential solution: integration of supports
• Would require deep and broad faculty & staff support
Faculty Engagement
• Previous attempts to broadly engage faculty have not always been successful
• Perhaps because reforms:– Often focus on student retention / completion
(institutional effectiveness) – Not on student learning (instructional
effectiveness)
Faculty Engagement
• Recommendation: Empower faculty to set challenging and meaningful student learning goals – Include not just content knowledge/skills– Create recommended protocols for
challenging areas
Academic Alignment & Assessment• In K-12, schools effective with disadvantaged
students have “instructional program coherence:”– Well-coordinated, “rationalized” curriculum– Common instructional framework– Clearly defined learning outcomes– Integrated assessments & academic supports
• Colleges do not put strong emphasis on these.
Academic Alignment & Assessment
• Recommendation: Faculty work together to craft learning outcomes. Process would:– Help faculty from different disciplines
communicate and align expectations for reading, writing, & math
– Help part-time instructors understand course goals
– Help students understand program goals & requirements
– Help high schools understand expectations
Continuous Improvement• Practices of high-performance organizations:
– Strong leadership
– Customer focus
– Functional alignment
– Process improvement
– Use of measurement for improvement
– Employee involvement
– Training and professional development
– External linkages
IMPROVED STUDENT LEARNING/COMPLETION
Set learning outcomes/completion goals
Targeted Faculty/Staff Training,
Prof Development
Continuous Improvement
Faculty/StaffInvolvement
LeadershipFocused onOutcomes
External Linkages
Employers
Universities
K-12 Schools
Adult BasicSkills
Non-creditWorkforcePrograms
CommunityGroups
Process Measurement, Alignment, Improvement
Set learning outcomes/completion goals
Measure student learning/progression
Identify learning/achievement gaps
Align practices/policies to improve outcomes
Evaluate and improve alignment efforts
Steps to Redesigning CCs for Completion
1) Engage faculty and staff to examine practices at key stages of students’ experience with the college
2) Redesign and align practices at scale, applying principles of effective practice, to increase rates at which students enter and then complete programs
3) Evaluate changes by comparing college’s past rates of program entry and, by program, rates of completion among concentrators
4) Repeat these steps, rethinking professional development practices, committee structure budgeting and incentives to institutionalize the process
Empower Faculty and Staff to Design/Implement Innovations at Scale
CONNECTIONFrom interest to enrollment
ENTRYFrom enrollment to entry
into program of study
PROGRESSFrom program entry to
75% of program requirements completed
COMPLETIONFrom program completion to credential of value for further education and (for CTE) labor
market advancement
• College readiness prep for hs students
• Early testing
• Strategic dual enrollment
• “Bridges” from ABE to college
• Recruitment materials with program streams clearly mapped out
• Program offerings / requirements clearly mapped out
• Consistent messages to new students
• Prescribed course sequence with required 3-credit college success course
• Dev ed contextualized to program streams
• Course learning outcomes/assessments tied to program outcomes
• Students required to declare major
• Students required to keep up-to-date program completion plan
• Revamped program review process to ensure that programs prepare for further education and career advancement
• Transfer agreements with universities that ensure junior standing
• Regular review of program learning outcomes by employers
• Survey of recent grads for suggestion of way to improve programs
Reports in the Series• Edgecombe, N., Accelerating the academic achievement of students
referred to developmental education: A review of the evidence.• Hodara, M., Reforming mathematics classroom pedagogy: Evidence-based
findings and recommendations for the developmental math classroom.• Hughes, K. & Scott-Clayton, J., Assessing developmental assessment in
community colleges.• Jaggars, S. S., Online learning: Does it help low-income and underprepared
students? • Jenkins, D., Redesigning community colleges for completion: Lessons from
research on high-performance organizations. • Karp, M. M., Toward a new understanding of non-academic student support:
Four mechanisms encouraging positive student outcomes in the community college.
• Perin, D., Facilitating student achievement through contextualization. • Scott-Clayton, J., The shapeless river: Does a lack of structure inhibit
students’ progress at community colleges? • Jenkins, D., Get with the program: Accelerating community college students'
entry into and completion of programs of study.
For more information:
Please visit us on the web at http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu,where you can download presentations, reports,
CCRC Briefs, and sign-up for news announcements.
CCRC is funded in part by: Alfred P. Sloan foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Kresge Foundation, Lumina Foundation for Education, The Ford Foundation, National Science Foundation (NSF), Institute of Education Sciences of
the U.S. Department of Education
Community College Research CenterInstitute on Education and the Economy, Teachers College, Columbia University
525 West 120th Street, Box 174, New York, NY 10027 E-mail: [email protected]: 212.678.3091