surikova maslo presentation

16
Preferable process of Preferable process of entrepreneurship training and entrepreneurship training and e-mentoring for business e-mentoring for business start-up: start-up: A case study of the CReBUS A case study of the CReBUS project project Dr.paed. Dr.paed. Svetlana Surikova Svetlana Surikova Dr.habil.paed. Dr.habil.paed. Irina Maslo Irina Maslo University of Latvia University of Latvia This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. The International Conference “Entrepreneurship Education - A Priority for the Higher Education Institutions – CReBUS” October 8-9, 2012, Bucharest, Romania

Upload: crebusproject

Post on 14-Jan-2015

428 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Surikova maslo presentation

Preferable process of Preferable process of entrepreneurship training and entrepreneurship training and

e-mentoring for business start-up: e-mentoring for business start-up: A case study of the CReBUS projectA case study of the CReBUS project

Dr.paed.Dr.paed. Svetlana Surikova Svetlana SurikovaDr.habil.paed.Dr.habil.paed. Irina Maslo Irina Maslo

University of LatviaUniversity of Latvia

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be

held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

The International Conference “Entrepreneurship Education - A Priority for the Higher Education Institutions – CReBUS”

October 8-9, 2012, Bucharest, Romania

Page 2: Surikova maslo presentation

Empirical research purpose

To identify students/graduates and young entrepreneurs’ learning and support needs in order to develop e-mentoring system of business start-up for CReBUS e-Learning Community.

Page 3: Surikova maslo presentation

Research stages and sample

– research preparation stage(December 2010 January 2011);

– data collection stage (February 2011);– data processing and analysis stage –

(March 2011).

The total research sample size was consisted of 109 students/graduates and 49 entrepreneurs from Romania, Italy, Spain, Austria, and Latvia.

Page 4: Surikova maslo presentation

Theoretical background

• study of important support needs of students for business start-up and factors of negative influence to business start-up (Kailer, 2009);

• case studies of mentoring and e-mentoring of young entrepreneurs and students in environment of networking and peer learning (Deakins et al., 1998; Cull, 2006; Zhang, Hamilton, 2009; Colvin, Ashman, 2010; Stewart, McLoughlin, 2007)

• studies of experience-based learning by doing, reflecting, networking (Deakins et al., 1998; Neck, Greene, 2011; Zhang, Hamilton, 2009; Oganisjana, 2010)

• previous surveys on entrepreneurial issues (EC reports, GEM study, VITA project, INTERACT project, WOMEN@BUSINESS project, etc.)

Page 5: Surikova maslo presentation

Proposed definition

Entrepreneurial environment is a dynamic system of causally interrelated entrepreneurial opportunities of learning/support/mentoring and barriers as challenges for discovering new opportunities.

Page 6: Surikova maslo presentation

Importance of the learning ways for students/graduates and entrepreneurs

Empirical finding 1

3,13

3,22

3,51

3,65

3,13

3,2

3,5

3,64

3,12

3,24

3,55

3,67

2,8 3 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,8

networking

self-directedlearning

experience-basedlearning

learning by doing

Entrepreneurs

Students/graduates

Total

Page 7: Surikova maslo presentation

Understanding of entrepreneurship education and training (by students/graduates)

Empirical finding 2

The most frequently mentioned categories of students/graduates’ understanding of entrepreneurship education and training were the following: – entrepreneurial potential (n=93), – practical skills (n=46)– opportunities of practical experience

(n=44).

Page 8: Surikova maslo presentation

Optimum proportion (in %) between theory and practice in a course of

entrepreneurship education (students/graduates and entrepreneurs)

Empirical finding 3.1

Page 9: Surikova maslo presentation

The comments of students/graduates and entrepreneurs regarding the theory and practice in a course of entrepreneurship education

Empirical finding 3.2

• Universities already offer economics courses – we need practice.

• Doing the practice you learn the theory.• I think that practice is more important

than theory.• It would be useful if the theory is

always supported by real and concrete examples.

• It’s essential to know the theory, but if is not related with a lot of practice, theory means nothing. Theory is something general, but practical things bring the real challenge.

• Theory is necessary to understand how practice works and what the differences are between theory and practice (and practice can be linked with theory).

• It's almost impossible to learn how to be an entrepreneur from books. 90% of time you will need to learn new things just to keep your business going.• Educational system has to give theoretical training and facilitate access to practical experiences out of the educational system.

For entrepreneurs

For students/graduates

Page 10: Surikova maslo presentation

Opinion about an e-mentoring activity

• The e-mentoring activity as value, good idea, good solution had been mentioned the most frequently (n=85) both by the entrepreneurs and students/graduates. However, there were 39 responses throwing doubt upon the effectiveness of e-mentoring.

• About 83% (n=91) of students/graduates were interested in attending an e-mentoring activity for those interested in entrepreneurship, but about 17% (n=18) were not interested.

• About 90% (n=98) of students/graduates were interested to learn from an experienced entrepreneur, but about 10% (n=18) were not interested.

• About 65% (n=32) of entrepreneurs were interested in e-mentoring of a youngster who wanted to start a business, but about 35% (n=17) were not interested.

Empirical finding 4.1

Page 11: Surikova maslo presentation

Hours of e-mentoring activity per week

Empirical finding 4.2

For entrepreneurs

For students/graduates

Page 12: Surikova maslo presentation

Conclusion 1

According to the empirical findings of the CReBUS project research the most important way of learning both for students/graduates and entrepreneurs is learning by doing. Entrepreneurial potential, practical skills and opportunities of practical experience are the most frequently mentioned categories of students’ understanding of entrepreneurship education and training. Italian respondents preferred more practice in a course of entrepreneurship education than respondents from Austria, Romania, Latvia and Spain.

Page 13: Surikova maslo presentation

Conclusion 2

The students/graduates were more interested to learn from an experienced entrepreneur how to start their business than entrepreneurs were interested in e-mentoring of a youngster who wanted to start a business. The e-mentoring activity as value, good idea, good solution had been mentioned the most frequently both by the entrepreneurs and students/graduates.

Page 14: Surikova maslo presentation

Conclusion 3

The following characteristics of preferable process of entrepreneurship training and e-mentoring for business start-up were identified: optimum proportion between theory and practice (e.g. 30% of theory and 70% of practice), preferable attending hours per week (e.g. two hours per week), efficiency and effectiveness of the process, providing of the opportunities of practical experience and learning from successful experienced entrepreneurs.

Page 15: Surikova maslo presentation

Conclusion 4

Efficient and effective process of entrepreneurship training and e-mentoring is a necessary component of entrepreneurial environment. The main objective of the entrepreneurship training and e-mentoring is providing the opportunities of developing entrepreneurial potential and motivation.