the engaging leader – part one

68
Strategic Business Leadership Executive Education Seminar THE ENGAGING LEADER – PART ONE. Tim Reynolds, MLHR Executive Director, Walter Center for Strategic Leadership

Upload: reece-walker

Post on 03-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

THE ENGAGING LEADER – PART ONE. Tim Reynolds, MLHR Executive Director , Walter Center for Strategic Leadership. “It’s Like A Brastemp !”. Personal Introduction. Academic – Ohio University & Ohio State - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Strategic Business LeadershipExecutive Education Seminar

THE ENGAGING LEADER – PART ONE.

Tim Reynolds, MLHRExecutive Director, Walter Center for Strategic Leadership

Page 2: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

“It’s Like A Brastemp!”

Page 3: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Personal Introduction • Academic – Ohio University &

Ohio State

• Work Experience – Twenty-Five Years in Human Resources, Talent and Leadership Development

• Companies Worked For - Whirlpool, Abbott Labs, Marathon Oil & Johns-Mansville Corporation.

• Passionate About – Developing Individual and Leadership Potential.

Page 4: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

The Engaging Leader Objectives:

1. To understand the impact leadership can have on employee engagement.

2. To consider concepts and tools leaders can apply.

3. To practice building engagement through alignment, conversation and teaming.

Page 5: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

The Work Of Leaders 5

Page 6: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Start Up Questions

• Are You Currently Leading Others?– Direct Reports– Through Influence

• What Challenges Are You Facing As A Leader?

Page 7: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

What Is Employee Engagement?

7

• Not employee happiness.

• Not employee satisfaction.

• The emotional commitment:– To Your Work– To Your Company– To Give Your

Discretionary Effort

Page 8: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Does Employee Engagement Matter?

• Towers Watson 2012 Global Workforce Study — 32,000 employees across 30 countries — makes the most powerful, bottom line case to date!

• In 50 global companies, Towers Watson found:

o Low Engagement = Avg. Margin < 10%

o High Engagement = Avg. Margin > 14%

8

Page 9: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

What Factors Impact Engagement?

1. Being Part of a Winning Organization.

2. Working for Admired Leaders.3. Having Positive Working

Relationships.4. Doing Meaningful Work.5. Gaining Recognition and

Appreciation.6. Living a Balanced Life.

9Source: The Banff Centre

Page 10: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

What People Say Are The Characteristics of The Most Admired Leaders:

• Honest

• Forward Looking

• Competent

• Inspiring

Page 11: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

What Changes Are Impacting Our Ability to Engage Employees?

11

• Economic • Organizational • Global • Generational • Technological

Organizations have become flat, fast and adaptive to deal with change.

Page 12: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

What Does That Mean For Leaders?

• According to Dr. Boris Groysberg, leaders must engage employees through “Organizational Conversation.”

• Leaders can create mental or emotional proximity.

12

Dr. Boris Groysberg, Professor of Business Administration, Harvard University

Page 13: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Proximity

• The state, quality, sense, or fact of being near or next; closeness.

• Physical proximity is becoming a challenge for leaders and employees

• Mental or emotional proximity appear to be the leadership opportunity

Page 14: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Emotional Proximity Is FirstBuilt Through Trust

• As a leader, how do you build trust?

• As a leader, how do you know people trust you?

Page 15: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

The Engaging Leader Afternoon Sessions

• The Electric Maze Team Engagement Simulation.

• The Engaging Leader Toolbox– High Performance

Teaming– Conversation– Alignment

Page 16: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE
Page 17: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

The Electric Maze

• Developed by Dr. Richard Kimball, Action Learning Associates, Inc.

• Designed for experiential team learning in a complex simulation

• Used for both group and individual development

• Designed around the 3 Ts: Training, Teambuilding and Testing

Page 18: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Simulation Structure

• Overview 10 Min• Strategy Session 7 Min• Activity 12 Min• Strategy Session 5 Min• Activity 12 Min• Debrief 15 Min

Page 19: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Rules• Strategy Sessions (2) and Team Crossing Sessions (2)

• One Person at a Time on the Maze

• Full Team Rotation – all members must take a turn crossing the Maze

• One Square at a time – No Jumping

• Must Enter from the Front – No entry from the sides

• No Touching the Maze when someone is on it

• No use of paper, coins, etc. to highlight the trail

• No Talking once the scenario begins. • Missteps Cost 1 dollar. You have $100 per team.

• All Members Must cross the Maze successfully – if not, the whole team goes back

• Written Material only in the Strategy Session

Page 20: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Debrief QuestionsLarge Group:What Interesting things did you notice during the Maze?

At your tables:What specific lessons will you take back and apply to your team. How will you do that?

Page 21: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Engaging Leadership Lessons• Clear Vision and strategies are critical for

“Alignment”• Good leaders know when to be good followers• Taking a step backwards is painful but often

necessary• Trust = Speed • Team learning is having a “collective

intelligence” that enables organizational learning

• Keep it simple• Learning occurs when we take risks and learn

from our failures and successes• Fear of blame can waste time when facing

uncertainty• Fun and celebration creates learning and

engagement

Page 22: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Teams that engage in healthy conflict…

• Have lively interesting meetings• Put critical topics on the table for discussion • Tackle issues “head on”• Solve real problems quickly• Minimize politics

Page 23: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

The Engaging Leader:Building High Performing Teams

Tammy Reynolds, MSILR

Page 24: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

A little about me…

• Grew up in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

• Have two awesome sons and a husband Tim (who you met earlier)

• Have a big lovable dog• Worked in industry for 20+

years, most recently with Whirlpool Corporation

• Joined Ohio University August 2012

• Love the outdoors – skiing, biking, hiking, kayaking

Page 25: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Sources used for this presentation

Page 26: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

The Good, the Bad, and the UglyDiscuss at your table:

•Think about your best team experience – sports, school, social organization, work place?•What made it great?

•Now think of the worst team•Why was it so bad?

Page 27: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

What Is a Team?

• Groups whose members work on a specific, common goal using their positive synergy, individual and mutual accountability, and complementary skills.

Page 28: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Inattention to Results

Avoidance of Accountability

Lack of Commitment

Fear of Conflict

Absence of Trust

Invulnerability

Page 29: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Lack of Trust

• What are some examples of lack of trust on teams that you have experienced?

Page 30: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Building Teams that Trust

Page 31: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Steven Covey - Trust

Page 32: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Emotional Bank AccountSteven Covey

Group ExerciseAt your tables, discuss deposits and

withdrawals that you might make into the emotional bank account of someone you love

Next, discuss deposits and withdrawals that you might make with fellow teammates at work

Page 33: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Emotional Bank AccountSteven Covey

Page 34: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Teams that trust…

• Admit weaknesses• Ask for help• Accept questions and input regarding their

areas of responsibility• Appreciate and tap into one another’s skills

and experiences• Offer and accept apologies

Page 35: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Inattention to Results

Avoidance of Accountability

Lack of Commitment

Fear of Conflict

Absence of Trust

Artificial Harmony

The Five Dysfunctions of a Teamby Patrick Lencioni

Page 36: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Groupthink

When a group exerts extensive pressure on an individual to align his or her opinion with that of others.

You Tube

Page 37: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Fear of Conflict

Traditional view of conflict - the view that all conflict is bad and must be avoided.

Page 38: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Functional Conflict

• Conflicts that support a group’s goals and improve its performance.

Page 39: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Dysfunctional Conflict

Dysfunctional conflicts - conflicts that prevent a group from achieving its goals(typically interpersonal)

Page 40: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Relationship Between Level of Conflict and Level of Performance

Page 41: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Programmed Conflict

Devil’s advocacy process of assigning

someone to play the role of critic to voice possible objections to a proposal and thereby generate critical thinking and reality testing

Dialectic method process of having two

people or groups play opposing roles in a debate in order to better understand a proposal

Page 42: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Teams that engage in healthy conflict…

• Have lively interesting meetings• Put critical topics on the table for discussion • Tackle issues “head on”• Solve real problems quickly• Minimize politics

Page 43: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Inattention to Results

Avoidance of Accountability

Lack of Commitment

Fear of Conflict

Absence of Trust

Ambiguity

The Five Dysfunctions of a Teamby Patrick Lencioni

Page 44: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Lack of Team Commitment

What does lack of commitment look like:•“Fuzzy” goals, no clear direction•Revisit discussions and decisions over and over again•Encourages second guessing

Page 45: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Social loafing - the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually.

Page 46: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

A team that commits…

Creates clarity around prioritiesMoves forward without hesitationAligns the team members around common

objectives

Page 47: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Inattention to Results

Avoidance of Accountability

Lack of Commitment

Fear of Conflict

Absence of Trust

Low Standards

The Five Dysfunctions of a Teamby Patrick Lencioni

Page 48: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Avoidance of Accountability

• Encourages mediocrity• Misses deadlines and key deliverables

Page 49: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Teams that hold each other accountable

• Ensure poor performers feel pressure to improve

• Identify potential problems quickly by questioning one another’s approaches

Page 50: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Inattention to Results

Avoidance of Accountability

Lack of Commitment

Fear of Conflict

Absence of Trust

Status & Ego

The Five Dysfunctions of a Teamby Patrick Lencioni

Page 51: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Inattention to Results

“The ultimate dysfunction of a team is the tendency of member to care about something other than the collective goals of the group.” (Lencioni, 2002)

•Rarely defeats competitors•Encourages team members to focus on their own careers and individual goals

Page 52: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Teams that focus on results…

• Win!• Retain achievement oriented employees• Minimizes individualistic behavior • Learn to subjugate individual egos and agenda

for the good of the team

Page 53: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Inattention to Results

Avoidance of Accountability

Lack of Commitment

Fear of Conflict

Absence of Trust

Status & Ego

Low Standards

Ambiguity

Artificial Harmony

Invulnerability

The Five Dysfunctions of a Teamby Patrick Lencioni

Page 54: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

How healthy is your team?

• Referring to Lencioni’s model, determine how healthy your team is

• What does your team do well?

• What can it improve upon?

• What one thing will you commit to changing on your team?

Page 55: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

THE ENGAGING LEADER – In Closing

Tim Reynolds, MLHRExecutive Director, Walter Center for Strategic

Leadership

Page 56: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

The Engaging Leader Objectives:

1. To understand the impact leadership can have on employee engagement.

2. To consider concepts and tools leaders can apply.

3. To practice building engagement through alignment, conversation and teaming.

Page 57: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

What Factors Impact Engagement?

1. Being Part of a Winning Organization.

2. Working for Admired Leaders.3. Having Positive Working

Relationships.4. Doing Meaningful Work.5. Gaining Recognition and

Appreciation.6. Living a Balanced Life.

57Source: The Banff Centre

Page 58: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

What Changes Are Impacting Our Ability to Engage Employees?

58

• Economic • Organizational • Global • Generational • Technological

Organizations have become flat, fast and adaptive to deal with change.

Page 59: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

What Does That Mean For Leaders?

• Leaders can create emotional proximity.

• Engagement is fostered through conversation that displays honesty, inspiration, a perspective of the future and knowledge in the present.

59

Dr. Boris Groysberg, Professor of Business Administration, Harvard University

Page 60: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Intimacy: Engaging Individuals

• Being Authentic

• Creating Trust

• Listening Well

• Getting Personal

Page 61: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Building Engagement Through Trust

Buddy – Buddy

High RelationshipLow Results

Standing For Greatness

High RelationshipHigh Results

Off The Hook

Low RelationshipLow Results

Driver

Low RelationshipHigh Results

Source: Gap International

Page 62: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Interactivity: Engaging Through New Opportunities

• Promoting Dialogue• Using Social

Technology

How Do You Message People?

Page 63: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Inclusion: Engaging Others In The Content

Expand Employees’ Roles and Perspectives:

• Thought Leadership

• Storytelling

• Experiential Learning

Page 64: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Seven Engaging Conversations

1. Conversation for being related – relevance to another.2. Conversation for possibility – standing for a future of

possibility. 3. Conversation for opportunity – tactical language for

achieving a possibility.4. Conversation for action – specific who, what, when. 5. Conversation for breakdown – dealing with resistance. 6. Conversation for acknowledgement – genuine expression of

appreciation. 7. Conversation for completeness –being whole.

Page 65: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Shaping Engaging Conversations1. What is the conversation and for whom?2. Create the Context (Possible questions to consider):

1. What is the context you want to create from this conversation?2. What is your Stand for yourself? For them?3. What is the experience or result you want to cause?4. Are you thinking from “Something is Possible”?

3. What is Their World? What is Your World? In other words, think through the concerns, issues, challenges and worries of your audiences. How will you bridge their world with your conversation?

4. What is the intention you have for the conversation?5. What are the specific outcomes you are committed to producing?6. How do you wish to close your conversation?

Page 66: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

Intentionality: Engaging The Organization

• Crafting the Agenda

• Taking a Stand for Possibility

• Building Alignment

Page 67: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

• Is your organization’s strategy being implemented?

• What One Action will you commit to doing to engage others in delivering the strategy of your organization?

Page 68: THE ENGAGING LEADER –  PART ONE

As Leaders, We Need To Practice! Thanks For Engaging With Us.