the intelligent business and business · pdf file23 white paper 3 defining the...

16
A white paper by Dan Burrows August 2011 THE INTELLIGENT BUSINESS AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE By Joe Bloggs

Upload: nguyenbao

Post on 08-Mar-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

A white paper by Dan BurrowsAugust 2011

THE INTELLIGENT BUSINESS AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE

By Joe Bloggs

White Paper

23

White Paper

AbstractThis article discusses the characteristics typical of an ‘intelligent business’; a well

controlled and well understood organisation able to measure its performance based

on factual evidence and base business decisions on sound performance indicators.

From this starting point, the various ways in which a business can recognise its own

need to develop greater intelligence, the rewards offered and challenges faced in

doing so are explored in more detail.

IntroductionEvery business faces its individual challenges on a daily basis; not to mention those

of the week, month and year. Whether a manufacturing business understanding

production requirements for each season, or a service business planning resources for

looming projects; high quality information, available when it’s needed and in a clear

and accurate form is critical to making the right decisions.

Planning for the future is just one part of the intelligent business. Equally, or arguably

more important, is the ability to identify, explain, and understand the contributing

factors involved in degradation or failure in service. Only by examining in detail the

various information streams at one’s disposal can the latter be achieved; a process

often complicated by the complexity and sheer abundance of data in the modern

business.

From staffing levels to finance, from production line machinery performance to

shipping delays, every business’ information comes from different sources, but each

has a key role to play in defining the performance of the organisation as a whole; the

ability to collect, collate, and analyse the various sources in an engaging and accurate

manner is the key to a successful development of a truly intelligent business.

23

White Paper

3

Defining the ‘Intelligent Business’The intelligent business is characterised by its management’s ability to control and

understand its key processes, clearly defined and communicated Key Performance

Indicators, a business strategy supported by and aligned with its core business

systems, and the speed at which it is able to identify, respond to, and resolve issues

which have arisen or are developing. Their management information analyses only

‘out-of-band’ occurrences; in other words, always reporting by exception. The

information delivered is accurate, available in the form required and available when

required; preferably delivered to key consumers, rather than extracted on request.

There exists, in the intelligent business, only ‘one version of the truth’; meaning

that data is collected and collated into a single source, generally known as a ‘data

warehouse’ which forms the core of most Business Intelligence projects. This single

source forms the basis for all reporting, whether by dashboard or scorecard, static

report or data-discovery tool. Its structure supports intuitive drill-downs and the more

complex ‘slice ‘n dice’ capabilities so commonly described by the sales literature for

reporting tools.

Figure 1: The intelligent business

White Paper

45

Naturally, all of the information must come from somewhere, and it is here that the

alignment of business strategy with technology becomes relevant. A well-aligned

business technology and business strategy delivers systems which support and

facilitate the business process, minimise business risk, maximise productivity and

allow the business to concentrate on delivering exceptional products at competitive

prices and providing excellent customer service. Exploiting the information within

these systems allows them to deliver another benefit; that of empowering the

organisation to measure its performance in detail against its objectives, and monitor

progression toward its goals. System-driven information is free from the intuition of

the users, delivering only facts and allowing critical decisions to be made based on

the most up-to-date and accurate information.

Supporting intelligence through technology

Bearing in mind this alignment between technology and strategy, it is important that

systems are designed, implemented, and operated with information outputs borne

in mind. Data should wherever possible be designed and stored to facilitate analysis;

categorising information using a clearly defined taxonomy, for example, greatly

simplifies the process of collating data from different sources. Implementing flexible

systems which can accommodate changing process and information needs facilitates

the management of change within the organisation, and integrating systems allows

every user in every department to see the same data without bridging gaps in

systems with paper, Microsoft Excel, or their own retained knowledge.

Recognising the need to change

Having explained the importance of being or becoming an intelligent business, it

is worthwhile for a moment exploring the traits that define a business needing to

enhance its intelligence; those that best demonstrate the need to develop intelligence

and reporting capability.

Clearly, those things which characterise the intelligent business can be reversed in

order to identify the ‘un-intelligent’ business; at the most basic level, the lack of

control, lack of aligned systems and systems unable to flex in order to accommodate

changing requirements.

As stated above, every business needs information in order to make the decisions

critical to surmounting the challenges they face daily; perhaps the most obvious

driver for developing the intelligent business is to generate the information which

45

White Paper

5

is conspicuous by its absence. Decisions are often made based on an intuition, or

retained knowledge which is often lacking in factual evidentiary support, and may

change based on a person’s perception of performance, understanding (or lack

thereof) of the decision to be made and their own opinion of what is the correct

conclusion. Whilst this may be a valuable method to support decision making in

some cases, consistent, accurate and up-to-date data significantly reduces business

risk.

Delays in retrieving information lead to delays in resolving problems; these can have

a significant impact on a business’ bottom line; consider, for example, the business

whose monthly KPI reports take a week to produce. Whilst this may sound like a long

timescale, it is not untypical or unusual for this to be the case.

An example of this springs to mind from one of Waterstons’ larger clients; for this

client, monitoring their position against competitors and making changes to pricing

and promotions was proving to be a headache. Although well defined KPIs were

in place, accessing the information necessary to monitor performance and revenue

against their competitors was made practically impossible due to the time taken to

extract and manipulate data.

• At this client, a competitor would lower their prices or begin a promotion at

the beginning of the month.

• At the end of the month, our client would undertake their KPI reporting; this

could take a number of days to complete.

• Once the KPI reports were available, our client would be immediately able to

identify a drop off in sales and number of customers.

• Having identified the drop-off, the client would then take action to reduce their

prices, or begin a promotional or marketing campaign. For the remainder of

the month, business would continue as usual.

• Intuitively, the client would be able to identify whether their sales were

returning to previous levels and customer numbers increasing, but it would

not be until the end of the month and the new KPI reports before this could be

confirmed.

Clearly, this is an extreme example, but the frequency and time taken over reporting

in this case means that should the competitor change pricing on 1st January, it

would be early March before the efficacy of our client’s response could be accurately

measured; and what if that response had not been successful? How long might it take

then?

White Paper

67

A solution to this problem might be to report more often; If we assume that the same

reporting which ordinarily takes a week is done more regularly, time will be saved

as the reporting process becomes more streamlined, but it is likely that a side effect

will be repetition in the reporting processes. In the case of our client, their long term

vision included implementing an enterprise Business Intelligence solution. By bringing

together their various data sources and integrating daily information from them, they

are now able to monitor their performance against KPIs with reporting information

which is never more than 24 hours out of date. The effect of changes in competitor

prices and offering can now be responded to within a day of those changes being

made.

In the business which needs intelligence, the management will often say ‘reporting

takes too long’, or ‘we’re never sure whose figures are accurate’. This is a direct result

of the inaccuracies and inconsistencies in reporting and data inherent in a business

where information is produced manually, manipulated by hand, and produced

from disparate, un-integrated systems. Typically, someone in the business will spend

much of their time extracting data from systems, then putting it into a format they

are comfortable with, such as a spreadsheet, and then manipulating it. Repeat this

process many times over for each of the core business systems, and one will end up

with a set of reports based on data which has been, often, mapped by hand and

processed so much that it may be impossible to relate it directly back to its source.

Management control and understanding

Delays, infrequent reporting, manual processing, repetition, system-to-system

data mapping, inaccuracy and inconsistencies in data all add up to the lack of

management control routinely seen within a business with a need to enhance its

intelligence, but there are other factors which typify this kind of business. These are

related to a lack of commonality and alignment between the organisation’s business

strategy and its business systems. Where an IT system does not exist to support a

business process, the data required for reporting is often stored in the most powerful

computer around which is also coincidentally the most difficult to access; the human

brain. This retained knowledge is all too regularly the source of inaccuracy, and also

clearly represents a massive business risk should any horror befall the information-

holder.

Requirements for information are often poorly defined within the business; this can

be as a result of a lack of understanding of what is possible, what data is available,

and what systems can be interrogated for information. It is also often the case that

67

White Paper

7

the required performance measures are not adequately defined or understood, and

that no clear and well-communicated management information strategy exists. As a

result, information is sometimes constructed by an additive process of several source

reports, and quite often in an ad-hoc, undocumented and inconsistent manner.

Additionally, it is typical to find considerable inertia in the information delivery

process. Commonly, one finds that an ad-hoc report has been produced as the

result of a legitimate query and delivered to an end-user. That end-user rarely

communicates back to the producer of the information as to whether or not it has

been used, been useful, or should be produced again. The report then continues

to be delivered on a regular basis, whether it is required or not, with the user never

challenging or reviewing their original requirement; instead they are likely to simply

shred the report!

It is important to recognise that in these situations, the tools and systems used to

generate the reports are rarely ideal. Typically spreadsheets, paper sources, manually

maintained information, and small desktop personal databases form the core of

the information assets held by the business. Spreadsheets and databases do not a

Business Intelligence platform make; however it would be unfair not to recognise

them as important and relevant tools when used in conjunction with that platform,

once it exists.

What can intelligence do for your business?The hallmarks of the intelligent business, as discussed above, do not in themselves

represent the output or delivered benefits of quality reporting and information.

Rather, the many characteristics of the intelligent business can be ‘boiled down’ into

several key benefits which work together to provide the organisation with a solid

basis for measuring and improving performance and productivity, managing costs

and improving quality of products and services.

The first and most important benefit which can be realised is to derive a far greater

understanding of the business as a whole; this encompasses all of the processes which

make up the business, its key drivers and strategic goals, and the means by which

success can be measured and facilitated. By bringing together the various disparate

data sources and integrating their information assets into one central source the

entire organisation benefits from accurate, consistent data. Benefiting from a single

view of the business’ data ‘from end-to-end’ allows better decisions to be made, with

all parties able to take advantage of the ‘single version of the truth’, which provides

factual support for the decision-making process and its stakeholders.

White Paper

89

Trusted Information

Using consolidated information to facilitate decision making is of great value; a

well designed and implemented Business Intelligence platform will deliver high

quality data to the business, spanning systems and data sources, business units, and

personnel roles, but this represents only half the story. In order to derive the greatest

benefits, data quality must not only be proven, but also accepted and trusted by the

business.

This critical change management issue could all too easily lead to the failure or

devaluation of the Business Intelligence project or management information platform;

the organisation must ensure, through communication and the commitment and

buy-in of senior managers that the whole business is made aware of the importance

and value of the information which will be provided by the project, and that the

information can and should be trusted. Only trustworthy data will lead to a successful

project delivery and success in the ongoing use of the platform.

Aligned technology and strategy

Every business has its own set of unique strategic goals and development aims; these

could be to manufacture more products, improve process efficiency and reduce costs,

enhance customer service effectiveness, develop and market new products, or any

number of others. Unfortunately, all too often a lack of alignment between strategy

and systems is identifiable within businesses; as a result one can infer a need to

develop the intelligence and reporting capabilities of that organisation.

Figure 2: The intelligence pyramid

89

White Paper

9

To succeed in achieving the strategic goals, the ability of good quality business

technology to act as an enabler to the business should be exploited; well

implemented, properly integrated systems provide the user day-to-day with all of

the tools they need to do their job and act as a technology accelerator to facilitate

business improvement. They will produce the key information and data needed to

make the right decisions and changes also needed to achieve the business goals. A

direct result of providing staff with good quality information, and communicating a

clear business strategy is that they are provided also with a means to visualise ‘the

bigger picture’ and empowered to make decisions aligned with the overall strategic

objectives of the organisation.

Preparing your business for intelligence

It is important to note that whilst there are numerous different ways to actually

implement a Business Intelligence solution, the process of selecting a technology

platform, vendor, or product is not one which should be undertaken too early.

Different businesses require different solutions, and whilst there are only a few

different overall approaches to delivering Business Intelligence, the choice of the

correct one, and the products which will deliver it, should only be made once certain

pre-requisite tasks are undertaken.

Figure 3: Preparing for intelligence

White Paper

1011

Many businesses do not have a well defined business strategy; it is important that

the Business Intelligence project starts from a well defined baseline, which requires

the business to develop and agree a business strategy and goals against which the

management information platform delivers data used to monitor progression.

Waterstons encourage their clients to undertake an exercise to clarify the business

strategy and its discipline driver (as described by Treacy and Wiersema[1]) in order to

gain the detailed understanding of their business concomitant with the definition of

its goals and objectives. This exercise produces an output in the form of a top-down

strategy map following the principles of Drs. Kaplan and Norton[2][3]. This strategy

map takes a ‘top-down’ approach to the business, identifying its financial drivers, the

perspectives of its customers and internal people, and mapping these to strategic

objectives for learning and growth.

Waterstons’ adaptation of the Kaplan and Norton model includes a further layer for

business technology systems, in which the key systems, supporting infrastructure and

information processes required to align the IT function with the business’ strategic

goals are identified. From the strategy map, a balanced scorecard can be directly

derived, a process and outcome again based on the principles of Drs. Kaplan and

Norton[4].

This method of visualising strategy has been used extensively by Waterstons for a

number of years; not only to drive the creation of balanced scorecards and hence

Figure 4: Understanding the business

1011

White Paper

11

facilitate KPI definition and Business Intelligence strategy, but also to support IT

strategy alignment projects, determine strengths and weaknesses in business and

technology alignment and provide customers with a powerful tool with which to

better understand their business. Using the Kaplan and Norton map as a central

part of the IT strategy allows customers to easily relate business goals to technology

platforms, irrespective of their level of technical understanding; this greatly eases the

process of gaining senior-level buy-in to IT projects, as return on investment can be

easily understood in the context of their business and their specific strategic goals.

Balanced Scorecards alone cannot drive the development of a Business Intelligence

strategy, however; in order to create a far reaching and functional management

information environment, the organisation’s Key Performance Indicators, and the

sources of information necessary to report against them must be identified.

Key Performance Indicators

KPIs must be driven by business needs, not by the information sources and business

systems available; and they must identify what can be done in order to significantly

improve process or increase productivity or performance. They will form a set of

measures which focus on the aspects of performance most critical for the current

and future success of the business; additionally the Business Intelligence solution will

produce information related to the Key Result Indicators which provide information

from which historical performance can be identified.

The KPIs identified must be prioritised for delivery; the Business Intelligence

implementation cannot and will not deliver data to measure performance against

all KPIs at the same time. As data sources are integrated, some KPI measurements

can naturally be delivered quickly, and it is important that the more important and

more valuable are concentrated on before moving through the often extensive list of

performance measures.

Understanding user uniqueness

From the point of view of delivering value, and also to assist with buy-in and

acceptance of the solution, it is important to understand the end-users’ requirements

of the Business Intelligence platform. Initially, an exercise to identify the various

groups represented within the user community should be undertaken; there will

almost always be operational, management and executive groups, but others may

become apparent through this exercise.

White Paper

1213

Each of these user groups will require their information to be delivered in different

forms; the operational user will often need only a small sub-set of the available

data to be provided, and often in a static and ‘non-rich’ fashion. Managers require

information supporting an overview of their area of responsibility, but need the ability

to drill-in in order to answer questions and queries arising from the top-level data.

Executive level users will often wish to be delivered only a high-level overview of the

whole business; showing the performance of individual business units this allows

them to identify at-a-glance any potential or developing performance problems. They

may require and be given the ability to drill-in to the data, although often this level

of detailed exploration will be left in the hands of senior managers with the executive

team looking only at the bigger picture.

Understanding the specific needs of each identified user group, and properly

reviewing, challenging, and documenting their requirements is a useful exercise

which will pay dividends when it comes to selecting a Business Intelligence approach,

products and implementers. Ensuring that the final solution is well matched to the

users’ requirements further assists in smoothing out the change management process

and in gaining the buy-in which will be so critical to the success of the project.

ConclusionsBusiness Intelligence is not the implementation of a product, not the selection of

a system, and certainly not producing information in volume. It is a far-reaching

concept which can have a fundamental and profound effect on a business.

It is sufficient, in order to begin the process of working towards utopia, to begin

with the simplest concepts; understanding your business and its critical success

factors, understanding your people, and understanding the ways in which success

is measured; in recognising the need to develop into an ‘intelligent business’, and

preparing the ground for moving forward into an implementation, no technical

details have been worked out, no products selected, and no overall approach

identified.

Focussing on working towards a ‘Business Intelligence system’ rather than an

‘intelligent business’ cannot deliver the greatest benefits which can be derived;

a software product or platform must be seen not as the means of delivery of an

intelligent business, but solely as a support for the critical elements of that delivery;

a clearly defined set of strategic objectives, and well understood and communicated

performance measures that every member of the business can buy into.

1213

White Paper

13

It is also worth making the point that whilst the purist approach discussed above

takes a linear path to a utopian solution, the real world of Business Intelligence rarely

follows this pattern. Businesses are constantly evolving, and change is an unavoidable

part of any organisation. The business which decides to invest in intelligence must

recognise that putting perfect systems and processes in place to support their

information requirements is an unrealistic and unachievable goal.

A realistic approach to the process is critical; whether tackling the business

department by department, accepting that some manual processes will be involved

in maintaining the data warehouse, or welcoming Excel spreadsheets and Access

databases into the Business Intelligence fold, the pragmatist realises that whilst

striving to achieve perfection is admirable, it is also unattainable.

Moving onward, the business will face key technical challenges as it enters the

conceptual design phase, before undertaking implementation and subsequent

maintenance of the selected management information platform and its constituent

parts. Whilst these challenges can be complex in nature and time-consuming to

solve, a set of clear objectives for the final delivery will simplify and facilitate the

development of a tool which will rapidly take its place at the heart of your business;

moving forward with this knowledge allows any challenge to be overcome.

Perhaps the most important point to be made is that there is no ‘one size fits all’

approach to Business Intelligence, and much less so a ‘typical’ solution. Just as every

business is different, with its own unique strengths and weaknesses, every Business

Intelligence platform, every reporting and management information mandate is

equally unique. Even businesses in the same sector, directly competing for the same

business from the same customers, will have their own requirements of their solution;

whilst there will always be a requirement to measure cost, revenue, profit, and

productivity, the precise means by which this will be achieved can differ wildly.

White Paper

1415

Bibliography[1] The Discipline of Market Leaders: Choose Your Customers, Narrow Your Focus,

Dominate Your Market: Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema, 1995. ISBN: 978-

0201407198

[2] “The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance”: Harvard Business

Review, January 1992

[3] Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes: Robert

Kaplan and David P Norton, 2004. ISBN: 978-1591391340

[4] Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action: Robert Kaplan and David P

Norton, 1996. ISBN: 978-0875846514

1415

White Paper

15

About the Author: Dan Burrows

Senior Consultant | Business Technology

Joined in 2008

Dan joined Waterstons from a varied career background,

working as a mainframe programmer and database

administrator in the insurance industry, and later as a hardware

and software support engineer before a spell in management within the NHS. He

specialises in business consultancy, working primarily in the healthcare and airport

sectors.

Key Specialisms:

• Business Consultancy

• IT Strategy Review

• System Selection

• Business Intelligence and Reporting

• Systems Analysis

• Systems Integration

• Requirements Analysis and Specification

• Information and Data Quality Analysis

Key Projects:

Project management of Business Intelligence platform development for an

international airport

ERP and Service Management system selection project for marine and land-based

engineering firm

Comparative systems analysis for international food manufacturing business

Durham OfficeWaterstons LimitedLiddon HouseBelmont Business ParkDurhamDH1 1TW

London Office344-354 Gray’s Inn RoadCamdenWC1X 8BP

0845 094 094 5www.waterstons.com