the intelligent business and business · pdf file23 white paper 3 defining the...
TRANSCRIPT
A white paper by Dan BurrowsAugust 2011
THE INTELLIGENT BUSINESS AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE
By Joe Bloggs
White Paper
23
White Paper
AbstractThis article discusses the characteristics typical of an ‘intelligent business’; a well
controlled and well understood organisation able to measure its performance based
on factual evidence and base business decisions on sound performance indicators.
From this starting point, the various ways in which a business can recognise its own
need to develop greater intelligence, the rewards offered and challenges faced in
doing so are explored in more detail.
IntroductionEvery business faces its individual challenges on a daily basis; not to mention those
of the week, month and year. Whether a manufacturing business understanding
production requirements for each season, or a service business planning resources for
looming projects; high quality information, available when it’s needed and in a clear
and accurate form is critical to making the right decisions.
Planning for the future is just one part of the intelligent business. Equally, or arguably
more important, is the ability to identify, explain, and understand the contributing
factors involved in degradation or failure in service. Only by examining in detail the
various information streams at one’s disposal can the latter be achieved; a process
often complicated by the complexity and sheer abundance of data in the modern
business.
From staffing levels to finance, from production line machinery performance to
shipping delays, every business’ information comes from different sources, but each
has a key role to play in defining the performance of the organisation as a whole; the
ability to collect, collate, and analyse the various sources in an engaging and accurate
manner is the key to a successful development of a truly intelligent business.
23
White Paper
3
Defining the ‘Intelligent Business’The intelligent business is characterised by its management’s ability to control and
understand its key processes, clearly defined and communicated Key Performance
Indicators, a business strategy supported by and aligned with its core business
systems, and the speed at which it is able to identify, respond to, and resolve issues
which have arisen or are developing. Their management information analyses only
‘out-of-band’ occurrences; in other words, always reporting by exception. The
information delivered is accurate, available in the form required and available when
required; preferably delivered to key consumers, rather than extracted on request.
There exists, in the intelligent business, only ‘one version of the truth’; meaning
that data is collected and collated into a single source, generally known as a ‘data
warehouse’ which forms the core of most Business Intelligence projects. This single
source forms the basis for all reporting, whether by dashboard or scorecard, static
report or data-discovery tool. Its structure supports intuitive drill-downs and the more
complex ‘slice ‘n dice’ capabilities so commonly described by the sales literature for
reporting tools.
Figure 1: The intelligent business
White Paper
45
Naturally, all of the information must come from somewhere, and it is here that the
alignment of business strategy with technology becomes relevant. A well-aligned
business technology and business strategy delivers systems which support and
facilitate the business process, minimise business risk, maximise productivity and
allow the business to concentrate on delivering exceptional products at competitive
prices and providing excellent customer service. Exploiting the information within
these systems allows them to deliver another benefit; that of empowering the
organisation to measure its performance in detail against its objectives, and monitor
progression toward its goals. System-driven information is free from the intuition of
the users, delivering only facts and allowing critical decisions to be made based on
the most up-to-date and accurate information.
Supporting intelligence through technology
Bearing in mind this alignment between technology and strategy, it is important that
systems are designed, implemented, and operated with information outputs borne
in mind. Data should wherever possible be designed and stored to facilitate analysis;
categorising information using a clearly defined taxonomy, for example, greatly
simplifies the process of collating data from different sources. Implementing flexible
systems which can accommodate changing process and information needs facilitates
the management of change within the organisation, and integrating systems allows
every user in every department to see the same data without bridging gaps in
systems with paper, Microsoft Excel, or their own retained knowledge.
Recognising the need to change
Having explained the importance of being or becoming an intelligent business, it
is worthwhile for a moment exploring the traits that define a business needing to
enhance its intelligence; those that best demonstrate the need to develop intelligence
and reporting capability.
Clearly, those things which characterise the intelligent business can be reversed in
order to identify the ‘un-intelligent’ business; at the most basic level, the lack of
control, lack of aligned systems and systems unable to flex in order to accommodate
changing requirements.
As stated above, every business needs information in order to make the decisions
critical to surmounting the challenges they face daily; perhaps the most obvious
driver for developing the intelligent business is to generate the information which
45
White Paper
5
is conspicuous by its absence. Decisions are often made based on an intuition, or
retained knowledge which is often lacking in factual evidentiary support, and may
change based on a person’s perception of performance, understanding (or lack
thereof) of the decision to be made and their own opinion of what is the correct
conclusion. Whilst this may be a valuable method to support decision making in
some cases, consistent, accurate and up-to-date data significantly reduces business
risk.
Delays in retrieving information lead to delays in resolving problems; these can have
a significant impact on a business’ bottom line; consider, for example, the business
whose monthly KPI reports take a week to produce. Whilst this may sound like a long
timescale, it is not untypical or unusual for this to be the case.
An example of this springs to mind from one of Waterstons’ larger clients; for this
client, monitoring their position against competitors and making changes to pricing
and promotions was proving to be a headache. Although well defined KPIs were
in place, accessing the information necessary to monitor performance and revenue
against their competitors was made practically impossible due to the time taken to
extract and manipulate data.
• At this client, a competitor would lower their prices or begin a promotion at
the beginning of the month.
• At the end of the month, our client would undertake their KPI reporting; this
could take a number of days to complete.
• Once the KPI reports were available, our client would be immediately able to
identify a drop off in sales and number of customers.
• Having identified the drop-off, the client would then take action to reduce their
prices, or begin a promotional or marketing campaign. For the remainder of
the month, business would continue as usual.
• Intuitively, the client would be able to identify whether their sales were
returning to previous levels and customer numbers increasing, but it would
not be until the end of the month and the new KPI reports before this could be
confirmed.
Clearly, this is an extreme example, but the frequency and time taken over reporting
in this case means that should the competitor change pricing on 1st January, it
would be early March before the efficacy of our client’s response could be accurately
measured; and what if that response had not been successful? How long might it take
then?
White Paper
67
A solution to this problem might be to report more often; If we assume that the same
reporting which ordinarily takes a week is done more regularly, time will be saved
as the reporting process becomes more streamlined, but it is likely that a side effect
will be repetition in the reporting processes. In the case of our client, their long term
vision included implementing an enterprise Business Intelligence solution. By bringing
together their various data sources and integrating daily information from them, they
are now able to monitor their performance against KPIs with reporting information
which is never more than 24 hours out of date. The effect of changes in competitor
prices and offering can now be responded to within a day of those changes being
made.
In the business which needs intelligence, the management will often say ‘reporting
takes too long’, or ‘we’re never sure whose figures are accurate’. This is a direct result
of the inaccuracies and inconsistencies in reporting and data inherent in a business
where information is produced manually, manipulated by hand, and produced
from disparate, un-integrated systems. Typically, someone in the business will spend
much of their time extracting data from systems, then putting it into a format they
are comfortable with, such as a spreadsheet, and then manipulating it. Repeat this
process many times over for each of the core business systems, and one will end up
with a set of reports based on data which has been, often, mapped by hand and
processed so much that it may be impossible to relate it directly back to its source.
Management control and understanding
Delays, infrequent reporting, manual processing, repetition, system-to-system
data mapping, inaccuracy and inconsistencies in data all add up to the lack of
management control routinely seen within a business with a need to enhance its
intelligence, but there are other factors which typify this kind of business. These are
related to a lack of commonality and alignment between the organisation’s business
strategy and its business systems. Where an IT system does not exist to support a
business process, the data required for reporting is often stored in the most powerful
computer around which is also coincidentally the most difficult to access; the human
brain. This retained knowledge is all too regularly the source of inaccuracy, and also
clearly represents a massive business risk should any horror befall the information-
holder.
Requirements for information are often poorly defined within the business; this can
be as a result of a lack of understanding of what is possible, what data is available,
and what systems can be interrogated for information. It is also often the case that
67
White Paper
7
the required performance measures are not adequately defined or understood, and
that no clear and well-communicated management information strategy exists. As a
result, information is sometimes constructed by an additive process of several source
reports, and quite often in an ad-hoc, undocumented and inconsistent manner.
Additionally, it is typical to find considerable inertia in the information delivery
process. Commonly, one finds that an ad-hoc report has been produced as the
result of a legitimate query and delivered to an end-user. That end-user rarely
communicates back to the producer of the information as to whether or not it has
been used, been useful, or should be produced again. The report then continues
to be delivered on a regular basis, whether it is required or not, with the user never
challenging or reviewing their original requirement; instead they are likely to simply
shred the report!
It is important to recognise that in these situations, the tools and systems used to
generate the reports are rarely ideal. Typically spreadsheets, paper sources, manually
maintained information, and small desktop personal databases form the core of
the information assets held by the business. Spreadsheets and databases do not a
Business Intelligence platform make; however it would be unfair not to recognise
them as important and relevant tools when used in conjunction with that platform,
once it exists.
What can intelligence do for your business?The hallmarks of the intelligent business, as discussed above, do not in themselves
represent the output or delivered benefits of quality reporting and information.
Rather, the many characteristics of the intelligent business can be ‘boiled down’ into
several key benefits which work together to provide the organisation with a solid
basis for measuring and improving performance and productivity, managing costs
and improving quality of products and services.
The first and most important benefit which can be realised is to derive a far greater
understanding of the business as a whole; this encompasses all of the processes which
make up the business, its key drivers and strategic goals, and the means by which
success can be measured and facilitated. By bringing together the various disparate
data sources and integrating their information assets into one central source the
entire organisation benefits from accurate, consistent data. Benefiting from a single
view of the business’ data ‘from end-to-end’ allows better decisions to be made, with
all parties able to take advantage of the ‘single version of the truth’, which provides
factual support for the decision-making process and its stakeholders.
White Paper
89
Trusted Information
Using consolidated information to facilitate decision making is of great value; a
well designed and implemented Business Intelligence platform will deliver high
quality data to the business, spanning systems and data sources, business units, and
personnel roles, but this represents only half the story. In order to derive the greatest
benefits, data quality must not only be proven, but also accepted and trusted by the
business.
This critical change management issue could all too easily lead to the failure or
devaluation of the Business Intelligence project or management information platform;
the organisation must ensure, through communication and the commitment and
buy-in of senior managers that the whole business is made aware of the importance
and value of the information which will be provided by the project, and that the
information can and should be trusted. Only trustworthy data will lead to a successful
project delivery and success in the ongoing use of the platform.
Aligned technology and strategy
Every business has its own set of unique strategic goals and development aims; these
could be to manufacture more products, improve process efficiency and reduce costs,
enhance customer service effectiveness, develop and market new products, or any
number of others. Unfortunately, all too often a lack of alignment between strategy
and systems is identifiable within businesses; as a result one can infer a need to
develop the intelligence and reporting capabilities of that organisation.
Figure 2: The intelligence pyramid
89
White Paper
9
To succeed in achieving the strategic goals, the ability of good quality business
technology to act as an enabler to the business should be exploited; well
implemented, properly integrated systems provide the user day-to-day with all of
the tools they need to do their job and act as a technology accelerator to facilitate
business improvement. They will produce the key information and data needed to
make the right decisions and changes also needed to achieve the business goals. A
direct result of providing staff with good quality information, and communicating a
clear business strategy is that they are provided also with a means to visualise ‘the
bigger picture’ and empowered to make decisions aligned with the overall strategic
objectives of the organisation.
Preparing your business for intelligence
It is important to note that whilst there are numerous different ways to actually
implement a Business Intelligence solution, the process of selecting a technology
platform, vendor, or product is not one which should be undertaken too early.
Different businesses require different solutions, and whilst there are only a few
different overall approaches to delivering Business Intelligence, the choice of the
correct one, and the products which will deliver it, should only be made once certain
pre-requisite tasks are undertaken.
Figure 3: Preparing for intelligence
White Paper
1011
Many businesses do not have a well defined business strategy; it is important that
the Business Intelligence project starts from a well defined baseline, which requires
the business to develop and agree a business strategy and goals against which the
management information platform delivers data used to monitor progression.
Waterstons encourage their clients to undertake an exercise to clarify the business
strategy and its discipline driver (as described by Treacy and Wiersema[1]) in order to
gain the detailed understanding of their business concomitant with the definition of
its goals and objectives. This exercise produces an output in the form of a top-down
strategy map following the principles of Drs. Kaplan and Norton[2][3]. This strategy
map takes a ‘top-down’ approach to the business, identifying its financial drivers, the
perspectives of its customers and internal people, and mapping these to strategic
objectives for learning and growth.
Waterstons’ adaptation of the Kaplan and Norton model includes a further layer for
business technology systems, in which the key systems, supporting infrastructure and
information processes required to align the IT function with the business’ strategic
goals are identified. From the strategy map, a balanced scorecard can be directly
derived, a process and outcome again based on the principles of Drs. Kaplan and
Norton[4].
This method of visualising strategy has been used extensively by Waterstons for a
number of years; not only to drive the creation of balanced scorecards and hence
Figure 4: Understanding the business
1011
White Paper
11
facilitate KPI definition and Business Intelligence strategy, but also to support IT
strategy alignment projects, determine strengths and weaknesses in business and
technology alignment and provide customers with a powerful tool with which to
better understand their business. Using the Kaplan and Norton map as a central
part of the IT strategy allows customers to easily relate business goals to technology
platforms, irrespective of their level of technical understanding; this greatly eases the
process of gaining senior-level buy-in to IT projects, as return on investment can be
easily understood in the context of their business and their specific strategic goals.
Balanced Scorecards alone cannot drive the development of a Business Intelligence
strategy, however; in order to create a far reaching and functional management
information environment, the organisation’s Key Performance Indicators, and the
sources of information necessary to report against them must be identified.
Key Performance Indicators
KPIs must be driven by business needs, not by the information sources and business
systems available; and they must identify what can be done in order to significantly
improve process or increase productivity or performance. They will form a set of
measures which focus on the aspects of performance most critical for the current
and future success of the business; additionally the Business Intelligence solution will
produce information related to the Key Result Indicators which provide information
from which historical performance can be identified.
The KPIs identified must be prioritised for delivery; the Business Intelligence
implementation cannot and will not deliver data to measure performance against
all KPIs at the same time. As data sources are integrated, some KPI measurements
can naturally be delivered quickly, and it is important that the more important and
more valuable are concentrated on before moving through the often extensive list of
performance measures.
Understanding user uniqueness
From the point of view of delivering value, and also to assist with buy-in and
acceptance of the solution, it is important to understand the end-users’ requirements
of the Business Intelligence platform. Initially, an exercise to identify the various
groups represented within the user community should be undertaken; there will
almost always be operational, management and executive groups, but others may
become apparent through this exercise.
White Paper
1213
Each of these user groups will require their information to be delivered in different
forms; the operational user will often need only a small sub-set of the available
data to be provided, and often in a static and ‘non-rich’ fashion. Managers require
information supporting an overview of their area of responsibility, but need the ability
to drill-in in order to answer questions and queries arising from the top-level data.
Executive level users will often wish to be delivered only a high-level overview of the
whole business; showing the performance of individual business units this allows
them to identify at-a-glance any potential or developing performance problems. They
may require and be given the ability to drill-in to the data, although often this level
of detailed exploration will be left in the hands of senior managers with the executive
team looking only at the bigger picture.
Understanding the specific needs of each identified user group, and properly
reviewing, challenging, and documenting their requirements is a useful exercise
which will pay dividends when it comes to selecting a Business Intelligence approach,
products and implementers. Ensuring that the final solution is well matched to the
users’ requirements further assists in smoothing out the change management process
and in gaining the buy-in which will be so critical to the success of the project.
ConclusionsBusiness Intelligence is not the implementation of a product, not the selection of
a system, and certainly not producing information in volume. It is a far-reaching
concept which can have a fundamental and profound effect on a business.
It is sufficient, in order to begin the process of working towards utopia, to begin
with the simplest concepts; understanding your business and its critical success
factors, understanding your people, and understanding the ways in which success
is measured; in recognising the need to develop into an ‘intelligent business’, and
preparing the ground for moving forward into an implementation, no technical
details have been worked out, no products selected, and no overall approach
identified.
Focussing on working towards a ‘Business Intelligence system’ rather than an
‘intelligent business’ cannot deliver the greatest benefits which can be derived;
a software product or platform must be seen not as the means of delivery of an
intelligent business, but solely as a support for the critical elements of that delivery;
a clearly defined set of strategic objectives, and well understood and communicated
performance measures that every member of the business can buy into.
1213
White Paper
13
It is also worth making the point that whilst the purist approach discussed above
takes a linear path to a utopian solution, the real world of Business Intelligence rarely
follows this pattern. Businesses are constantly evolving, and change is an unavoidable
part of any organisation. The business which decides to invest in intelligence must
recognise that putting perfect systems and processes in place to support their
information requirements is an unrealistic and unachievable goal.
A realistic approach to the process is critical; whether tackling the business
department by department, accepting that some manual processes will be involved
in maintaining the data warehouse, or welcoming Excel spreadsheets and Access
databases into the Business Intelligence fold, the pragmatist realises that whilst
striving to achieve perfection is admirable, it is also unattainable.
Moving onward, the business will face key technical challenges as it enters the
conceptual design phase, before undertaking implementation and subsequent
maintenance of the selected management information platform and its constituent
parts. Whilst these challenges can be complex in nature and time-consuming to
solve, a set of clear objectives for the final delivery will simplify and facilitate the
development of a tool which will rapidly take its place at the heart of your business;
moving forward with this knowledge allows any challenge to be overcome.
Perhaps the most important point to be made is that there is no ‘one size fits all’
approach to Business Intelligence, and much less so a ‘typical’ solution. Just as every
business is different, with its own unique strengths and weaknesses, every Business
Intelligence platform, every reporting and management information mandate is
equally unique. Even businesses in the same sector, directly competing for the same
business from the same customers, will have their own requirements of their solution;
whilst there will always be a requirement to measure cost, revenue, profit, and
productivity, the precise means by which this will be achieved can differ wildly.
White Paper
1415
Bibliography[1] The Discipline of Market Leaders: Choose Your Customers, Narrow Your Focus,
Dominate Your Market: Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema, 1995. ISBN: 978-
0201407198
[2] “The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance”: Harvard Business
Review, January 1992
[3] Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes: Robert
Kaplan and David P Norton, 2004. ISBN: 978-1591391340
[4] Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action: Robert Kaplan and David P
Norton, 1996. ISBN: 978-0875846514
1415
White Paper
15
About the Author: Dan Burrows
Senior Consultant | Business Technology
Joined in 2008
Dan joined Waterstons from a varied career background,
working as a mainframe programmer and database
administrator in the insurance industry, and later as a hardware
and software support engineer before a spell in management within the NHS. He
specialises in business consultancy, working primarily in the healthcare and airport
sectors.
Key Specialisms:
• Business Consultancy
• IT Strategy Review
• System Selection
• Business Intelligence and Reporting
• Systems Analysis
• Systems Integration
• Requirements Analysis and Specification
• Information and Data Quality Analysis
Key Projects:
Project management of Business Intelligence platform development for an
international airport
ERP and Service Management system selection project for marine and land-based
engineering firm
Comparative systems analysis for international food manufacturing business