the noaa fisheries navigator · the noaa fisheries navigator see cod, page 2 this supplement...

Paid copy, materials provided by the sponsor. COMMERCIAL FISHERIES NEWS • SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT • SEPTEMBER 2016 • 1

MONTH AREA CLOSURES(30 MINUTE SQUARE) CORRESPONDING MAP PANEL

May All Vessels: 125 north of 42°20’ N. lat., 132, 133, 138, 139, 140 May Closure

June All Vessels: 125 north of 42°20’ N. lat., 132, 139, 140, 146, 147 June Closure

July None No Closure

August None No Closure

September None No Closure

October Non-Sector Vessels: 124, 125 October Closure

November All Vessels: Portion of 124, 125 Winter Closure

December All Vessels: Portion of 124, 125 Winter Closure

January All Vessels: Portion of 124, 125 Winter Closure

February None No Closure

March Non-Sector Vessels: 121, 122, 123 March Closure

April None No Closure

Note: Handgear A vessels are exempt from the same closures as sector vessels.

Table 1. Gulf of Maine Cod Protection Closures

The NOAA FISHERIES NAVIGATOR

See COD, page 2

THIS SUPPLEMENT PROVIDED BY NOAA FISHERIES SERVICE'S GREATER ATLANTIC REGIONAL OFFICEOlivia Rugo • Managing Editor • 978-675-2167 • [email protected]

T he Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod protection areas, put in place in 2015, can be confusing for those of us familiar with the old rolling closures. They

get even more confusing when we close common pool trimester Total Allowable Catch (TAC) areas to certain gear types.

What are the GOM Cod Protection Closures?The GOM Cod Protection Closures are

reconfigurations of the GOM rolling closures, and were put in place to protect cod while providing more fishing opportunities to target healthy stocks like haddock. The closures are described in Table 1 and Figure 1 and change each month on the first day of the month. The areas are closed to all Federal commercial vessels, with a few exceptions. Some closures do not apply to sector vessels and limited access Handgear A vessels.

What are the common pool Trimester TAC Closures?At the start of each fishing year or Trimester, there

are no Trimester TAC closures in effect. The common pool trimester TAC area closures are triggered when the trimester TAC for a groundfish stock has been caught. Specific statistical areas close to common pool vessels fishing with certain gears based on which stock’s trimester TAC has been caught. Once an area is closed to certain gear types, the area remains closed until the end of that trimester, and reopens at the start of the next trimester. The areas that will close for each stock, and the gears that the closure will apply to, are listed in Table 2 (next page). The statistical areas are shown in Figure 1.

How do these closures overlap?The GOM Cod Protection Closures

overlap with some of the statistical areas that can be closed as part of the Trimester TAC closures (specifically statistical areas 513, 514, 515, 521, and 522). If there is an active GOM Cod Protection Closure, it supersedes the Trimester TAC closure.

For example, if the trimester TAC for GOM winter flounder has been caught, statistical area 514 will be closed to common pool vessels fishing with trawl gear or gillnet gear. Common pool vessels can still fish in statistical area 514 with hook gear. However, if this trimester TAC closure is in effect in June, when there is an active GOM Cod Protection Closure (which overlaps with part of statistical area 514), no common pool vessel can fish within the June GOM Cod Protection Closure area, regardless of gear type.

Staying on the Water and Out of Trouble: Seasonal Gulf of Maine Cod Protection Areas

È È È È È È È È È È È È È È È È



















È È È È È È È È















































ME

NH

MA

125

133 132

140 139 138

#512

#513

#514

#515

#521 #522

#538

68°W69°W70°W71°W

44°N 44°N

43°N 43°N

42°N 42°N

68°W69°W70°W71°W



































































ME

NH

MA

125

132

140 139

147 146#512

#513

#514

#515

#521 #522

#538

68°W69°W70°W71°W

68°W69°W70°W71°W



































































ME

NH

MA

125 124

#512

#513

#514#515

#521 #522

#538

68°W69°W70°W71°W

44°N 44°N

43°N 43°N

42°N 42°N

68°W69°W70°W71°W



































































ME

NH

MA

125 124

#512

#513

#514#515

#521 #522

#53868°W69°W70°W71°W

44°N 44°N

43°N 43°N

42°N 42°N



































































ME

NH

MA

123 122 121

#512

#513

#514

#515

#521 #522

#53868°W69°W70°W71°W



































































ME

NH

MA116 115 114 113 112 111

125 124 123 122 121 120

133 132 131 130 129 128

140 139 138 137 136 135

147 146 145 144 143

152 151 150

#512#513

#514

#515

#521 #522

#53868°W69°W70°W71°W

44°N 44°N

43°N 43°N

42°N 42°N

MAY CLOSURE

WINTER CLOSURE(Nov, Dec, Jan)

JUNE CLOSURE OCTOBER CLOSURE

MARCH CLOSURE NO CLOSURE(Feb, Apr, Jul, Aug, Sep)

Gulf of MaineCod Protection Closures

30 Minute Square123

Statistical Area#Closure for All Groundfish VesselsClosure for Non-Sectors Vessels(DAS, HB, & Small Vessel only)

Groundfish Closure(Year-round)È È È È È È

È È È È È È

È È È È È È

È È È È È È

È È È È È È

È È È È È È

È È È È È È

È È È È È È

È È È È È È

È È È È È È

È È È È È È

È È È È È È

È È È È È È

Figure 1.

2 • COMMERCIAL FISHERIES NEWS • SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT • SEPTEMBER 2016 Paid copy, materials provided by the sponsor.


H istorically, countless Atlantic Coast streams and rivers from Maine to Florida were characterized as “running silver” each spring with the return

of millions of adult American shad and river herring. But as time marched on, dams were built, sewage wastes were discharged to riverways, and fish harvesting techniques advanced, tragically eliminating or severely decimating the populations of these important fishes that link river and sea ecosystems. American shad are important to both Atlantic Coast commercial and recreational fisheries, while alewife and blueback herring, commonly known as “river herring” or “buckies,” serve as bait for the lobster and striped bass fisheries. These migratory fish require free-flowing streams and rivers in order to access both quantity and quality spawning habitats to sustain their populations and harvest.

The Pawcatuck River in southeastern Rhode Island is an example of a river that used to run silver, but has been severely impacted by the building of dams. In the mid 17th century, Roger Williams wrote about the great abundance of migratory fish runs in the Pawcatuck and the values of these runs to native peoples. The first documented dam was constructed on the lower Pawcatuck in 1762. Construction of dozens more dams

Bringing Back the Great Fish Runs on the Pawcatuck River

N OAA Fisheries, through its Restoration Center (founded 25 years ago as an outcome of the Exxon Valdez oil spill),

has contributed to restoring migratory fish runs by providing funds and technical assistance for removing defunct dams and other barriers. Since 1996, NOAA Fisheries has partnered with states, towns, and NGOs to implement nearly 300 fish passage projects along the Atlantic Coast. Most of these projects, like those completed on the Pawcatuck, are located in in the Northeast region. About 41 percent of these projects have been dam removals, while others have involved culvert replacements, or fish ladder or nature-like fishway installations.

on the main part of the river, or “mainstem” followed, as well as on many of its tributaries like the Wood River. Early dams serviced grist mills that ground grain, saw mills that produced lumber, and fulling mills that produced textiles. A mill village often followed each dam that was built.

But times have changed. While the mill villages

remain or have expanded into towns, most of the mills and dams are degrading and forgotten structures, creating significant liability to their owners and the people living downstream and nearby. Fortunately, programs have been established by federal and state agencies, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to proactively restore migratory fish populations.

The Pawcatuck River flows nearly 25 miles through broad expanses of forested swamps and upland forest in southwestern Rhode Island and a small piece of Connecticut. More than 80 percent of the Pawcatuck watershed

remains forested, and large lakes like the 1,043-acre Worden Pond are located throughout the watershed, creating a total of 1,967 acres of important river-connected ponds. Because of this high proportion of undeveloped watershed, the high water quality of the Pawcatuck has been sustained. According to Chris Fox, Executive Director of the Wood-Pawcatuck Watershed Association (WPWA), “The Pawcatuck River watershed is far less developed in comparison to many other southern New England rivers, making it a great candidate for fish passage restoration. Of all the watershed protection and restoration efforts that WPWA has been engaged in during its 33-year history, restoring migratory fish access throughout this watershed has had the greatest positive impact to the watershed, its residents, and our region’s coastal fisheries.” To attest to the importance of this watershed, WPWA is leading an on-going effort to have the Wood-Pawcatuck River system federally-designated as a Wild and Scenic River.

NOAA Fisheries’ regional scientists have targeted migratory fish passage restoration on the Pawcatuck for nearly two decades due to its high ecological qualities. In 2009, through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), we awarded over $3 million to Rhode Island’s Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC) to restore fish passage at six barriers, three of which were located on the upper Pawcatuck.

The Pawcatuck River and vast wetlands upstream of its confluence with Little Narragansett Bay (Photo: C. Mason)

Continued from page 1Cod protection areas

STOCK STATISTICAL AREA GEAR

GOM cod 513, 514 Trawl, gillnet, longline/hookGB cod 521, 522, 525, 561 Trawl, gillnet, longline/hook

GOM haddock 513, 514, 515 Trawl, gillnet, longline/hookGB haddock 521, 522, 525, 561, 562 Trawl, gillnet, longline/hook

CC/GOM yellowtail flounder 514, 521 Trawl, gillnetGB yellowtail flounder 522, 525, 561, 562 Trawl, gillnet

SNE/MA yellowtail flounder 537, 539, 538, 613 Trawl, gillnetGOM winter flounder 514 Trawl, gillnetGB winter flounder 522, 525, 561, 562 Trawl

Witch flounder 512, 513, 514, 515, 521, 522, 525 TrawlAmerican plaice 512, 513, 514, 515, 521, 522, 525 Trawl

Pollock 513, 514, 515, 521, 522 Gillnet, trawl, longline/hookRedfish 513, 514, 515, 521, 522 Trawl

White hake 513, 514, 515, 521, 522 Gillnet, trawl GOM = Gulf of Maine; GB = Georges Bank; CC = Cape Cod; SNE = Southern New England

Table 2. Common Pool Trimester TAC Area Closures

How do I travel through a closed area?A vessel can travel from a point outside of a

closed area to another open area or to port, or from port to an area outside the closed area, provided that its gear is stowed in accordance with the regulations. Information on travelling through closed areas, also known as transiting, can be found on our website at:

www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/regs/infodocs/gearstowage.pdf.

If you have further questions about the GOM Cod Protection Closures, the Trimester TAC closures, or transiting closed areas, contact the Sustainable Fisheries Division at (978) 281-9315.

Paid copy, materials provided by the sponsor. COMMERCIAL FISHERIES NEWS • SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT • SEPTEMBER 2016 • 3

to the decades-old, poorly functioning Denil fishway at the Potter Hill dam. However, the project partners are developing a plan for a permanent fish passage solution at this 9-foot high dam, last rebuilt in 1903 and not in use since 1958.

Free passage by shad, river herring and other fish species using the Pawcatuck River has been greatly reduced by dam construction and operation for more than 250 years. Now, through the tireless efforts of a consortium of stalwart project partners and supportive dam owners, there is a very bright future for the Pawcatuck. This river will soon be fish-passage friendly throughout the mainstem and watershed, providing access to the high quality spawning and rearing habitats needed to increase the fish runs on this river. These efforts will also help increase the abundance of these important migratory fishes in our New England coastal waters.

For more information, contact James Turek, Habitat Restoration Division, at (401) 782-3338 or email him at [email protected]

projects to link our land protection efforts with restoring access by river herring and American shad to important upstream spawning habitats,” according to Scott Comings, Associate State Director, TNC Rhode Island.

Restoration partner attention is now focused on the two remaining mainstem barriers on the lower Pawcatuck – the Bradford Dyeing and Potter Hill dams. TNC is committed to working with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service other partners, including NOAA Fisheries and design engineer consultant, Fuss & O’Neill, to complete dam removal and fish passage design plans for the timber-crib Bradford Dyeing dam. With USDOI Storm Sandy funds, TNC and partners are

optimistic that supplemental funds will soon be obtained so that the Bradford project can be implemented in the near future. Remaining USDOI Storm Sandy funds will be used by TNC and RIDEM to make temporary fixes

CRMC and NOAA Fisheries joined forces with the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM), the WPWA, The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Save the Bay, American Rivers, Trout Unlimited, other federal agencies, local towns, engineering consultants, and dam owners to infuse additional funds and expertise into timely project assessment, design, and implementation phases.

The first ARRA project was the removal of the Lower Shannock Falls dam in 2010, formerly a cotton mill with timber crib dam, which was owned by two towns. This project was followed by the 2012 construction of a Denil fish ladder with a high-tech eelpass at the upstream Horseshoe Falls dam. This dam, located in the mill village of Shannock, required a design and appearance to well fit with the historic dam structure and village center setting. As a result, the fishway and eelpass were carefully nestled next to the dam and constructed with a wrought-iron cover and a wall façade to be similar in appearance to the existing stone dam and surrounding bedrock.

In 2013, the Kenyon Mill dam, the furthest upriver dam, was removed and a nature-like, step-pool fishway was constructed. The fishway was built to maintain headpond water levels for existing water uses by the mill and residences, while providing effective upstream passage for shad and herring, and safe downstream passage by the fish and for canoers and kayakers. As owner of the dam, Kenyon Industries, a successful textile manufacturer, worked tirelessly with WPWA, NOAA Fisheries and other partners to collaboratively design and complete the last upper Pawcatuck River passage project to lead returning fish into Worden Pond and the headwaters, beyond.

Fish passage restoration in the watershed continues. In late 2015, TNC removed the 6-foot high, concrete and timber White Rock dam, the lowest dam on the Pawcatuck and located in Westerly, Rhode Island. The White Rock dam had been in place since the 1840s, along with an extended one-half mile long mill raceway that diverted most of the flow from the river. The dam was a total barrier to passage, and the high gradient of the raceway creating excessive flows and a velocity barrier to fishes migrating upriver. TNC worked with a team of consultants to remove the dam, restore the channel grades of the downstream river reach, and close off normal river flows to the raceway, but accommodate storm flows. This project was completed with funding from a U.S Department of Interior (USDOI) Storm Sandy grant and collaboration with partners.

“TNC has been working for decades to conserve the Pawcatuck watershed as a special area for the benefit of all Rhode Islanders. In the last few years, we have become more involved in Pawcatuck River connectivity

Kenyon Mill dam (2011) and post-dam removal with nature-like fishway (2013) on upper Pawcatuck River (Photos: J. Turek)

Mid-Atlantic Gillnet Fisheries (Large & Small Mesh)

Area Dates Gear Modifications Required

Dates Gillnet Closure

Large Mesh Gillnet (Mesh Size 7-18 inches)

Waters off New Jersey Management Area Jan. 1- March 31; April 21- April 30 April 1- April 20

Mudhole North Management Area Jan. 1- April 30 Feb. 15- March 15; April 1-April 20

Mudhole South Management Area Jan. 1- Jan. 31; March 16-March 31; April 21- April 30

Feb. 1- March 15; April 1-April 20

Southern Mid-Atlantic Management Area Feb. 1- Feb. 14; March 16- April 30 Feb. 15-March 15

Small Mesh Gillnet (Mesh Size >5 inches to < 7 inches)

Waters off New Jersey Management Area Jan. 1- April 30

Mudhole North Management Area Jan. 1- April 30 Feb. 15- March 15

Mudhole South Management Area Jan. 1- Jan. 31; March 16-April 30 Feb. 1- March 15

Southern Mid-Atlantic Management Area Feb. 1-April 30 -

H PTRP regulations are designed to reduce serious injury and mortality of harbor porpoises in the Northeast sink gillnet

and Mid-Atlantic gillnet fisheries from Maine through North Carolina. Conservation measures are summarized below. They include seasonal pinger requirements, gear modifications, and time/area closures. Nautical charts detailing the management area s can be found on our webpage, at

Northeast Gillnet Fisheries (All)Area Dates Restrictions

Northeast Closure Area August 15- September 13 CLOSUREMid-Coast Management Area September 15- May 31 Pingers Required

Massachusetts Bay Management AreaNovember 1- February 28/29 Pingers Required

March 1-31 CLOSUREApril 1- May 31 Pingers Required

Stellwagen Bank Management Area November 1- May 31 Pingers RequiredSouthern New England Management Area December 1- May 31 Pingers RequiredCape Cod South Closure Area March 1-31 ClosureOffshore Management Area November 1- May 31 Pingers RequiredCashes Ledge Closure Area February 1-28/29 CLOSURE

Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan (HPTRP) Remindershttp://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected/porptrp/outr.html.

For more information, contact the HPTRP Coordinator, Kate Swails, at (978) 282-8481 or visit the HPTRP web page at www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected/porptrp/. If you have questions about gear requirements, please contact the fishery liaison for your area: John Higgins (978) 711-3669 in New England and Glenn Salvador (757) 414-0128 in the Mid-Atlantic.

4 • COMMERCIAL FISHERIES NEWS • SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT • SEPTEMBER 2016 Paid copy, materials provided by the sponsor.


E arlier this year, NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries’ Headquarters office announced internal competitive funding opportunities for projects supporting the

National Catch Share Program and requirements under the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office (GARFO) and Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC) were successful in receiving funding for several projects. These include:

Social and Economic Analysis for New England Groundfish 5-Year Program Review

The Magnuson-Steven Act requires periodic review of catch share programs, and the NEFMC has determined that a program review of the social and economic effects of sector allocation is appropriate. The program review is expected to occur during fiscal year 2017 (October 2016 through September 2017) with the primary purpose of evaluating the extent to which the Council’s goals and objective for the catch share program have been met. Information from the review may be used to determine whether changes may be needed to improve social and economic benefits to achieve Optimum Yield in the fishery. This project will benefit from recent guidance for conducting program reviews as well as experience gained from 5-year program reviews of the Golden Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) program and the general category Scallop IFQ. The experiences of these programs will provide a foundation for analytical best practices, and the assembly and analysis of relevant data and key sources of information.

Further Field Deployment of eClams to Support ITQ Fisheries

As data management in the Northeast Region moves forward, electronic vessel reporting will play a crucial role in data quality, timeliness, and data. The expansion of and support for electronic reporting tools are critical aspects in the ability to modernize commercial fisheries data collections. The Northeast Fisheries Science Center’s

Special Projects Supporting the National Catch Share Program and Requirements under the Magnuson-Stevens Act

A lot of data is needed to manage our fisheries effectively. Barry Clifford, in our Analysis and Program Support Division, is now coordinating

the on-going efforts that we started in 2013, working with our regional Northeast Fisheries Science Center to modernize our fishery dependent data collections.

What is fishery dependent data? It is information on landings, catches and discards, fishing location, and gear type that is submitted by fish dealers and commercial and recreational fishermen. Together, this data is used to inform stock assessments and fisheries regulatory decision-making.

The purpose of this effort, known as the Visioning Project, is to more effectively combine all of our data sources so that they can be stored in one place and used more efficiently. To do so, we envision an electronic trip identifier that will link the data reported by fishermen for each fishing trip to other fisheries dependent data collection systems, such as dealer and observer reports. By better connecting all of these data sources together, we gain a more complete understanding of our fisheries.

So far, we’ve produced a detailed set of recommendations that staff from our Regional Office, Science Center, and the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative

Statistics Program (ACCSP) are working together to implement. These actions include addressing operational issues in our current data collection systems, and developing the systems needed to build the data warehouse that will be kept at ACCSP. Coordination among these three parties is essential to the success of our Visioning Project, and this is where our new Fishery Dependent Data Coordinator, Barry Clifford, comes in!

Barry will work on behalf of both our Regional Office and Science Center to coordinate the Visioning Project and its activities. He will work with our regional and ACCSP staff to ensure clear and timely communication, and continue fulfilling agreed upon goals. Barry has a varied background that includes years of project management experience in the private sector, followed by more than ten years of experience working in various aspects of our region’s fishery data collection program. He brings the technical knowledge and professional experience needed to handle this challenging assignment.

If you have any questions, Barry can be reached at (978) 281-9148, or email him at <[email protected]>.

So Who Manages Our Fisheries Data?!

package is capable of collecting information on fishing effort and catch (kept and discarded) on a haul-by-haul basis, and is integrated with a vessel’s GPS, vessel monitoring system, and depth sounder feeds. Study Fleet vessels also collect bottom temperature data while fishing. This more detailed information is crucial for advancing fisheries science and management, and can also be used by the individual fisherman to improve the efficiency of their operations. This includes applications for understanding species habitat partitioning for bycatch avoidance, and a better understanding of species presence/absence in relation to environmental factors.

Industry-led Fishing Gear Workshop for Non-Fishermen NMFS staff must often consider gear-related issues

when implementing fishery management measures or communicating with the fishing industry, but may lack familiarity with how commercial fishing gears are designed, and operated. With funding received by GARFO, the University of New Hampshire will host two workshops to provide approximately 50 NMFS staff with hands-on experience with commercial fishing gear design, performance, and operation. Workshops will include both shore-side instruction and field demonstrations aboard commercial fishing vessels.

Electronic Technologies Funding to Support Electronic Monitoring Video Review

NMFS is evaluating two applications for Electronic Monitoring involving video cameras in the groundfish fishery - the audit and maximized retention models. The “audit” model uses Electronic Monitoring (EM) to verify industry-reported discards on Vessel Trip Reports. The ‘maximized retention’ model requires vessels to retain select allocated groundfish species and uses EM to verify discard compliance. NMFS is working with The Nature Conservancy, the Gulf of Maine Research Institute (GMRI), sectors, and other components of the fishing industry to explore the audit model in 2016 under an Exempted Fishing Permit. Up to 20 day-trip vessels will participate in the EFP, and NMFS will work to address legal requirements, data integration, and costs through the experimental work. NMFS will also be working with the Environmental Defense Fund and GMRI to explore the maximized retention model beginning in 2017 and focusing on larger offshore trip vessels.

Electronic Monitoring technology will also be deployed on up to 12 vessels actively participating in the Atlantic herring and mackerel mid-water trawl fisheries with the purpose of improving catching accounting over a 16-month period. This project began in the summer of 2016, and is consistent with the objectives of the New England and Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Councils to improve monitoring and to address bycatch in these fisheries. The Atlantic herring and mackerel mid-water trawl fisheries have limited discarding because the contents of the net are pumped directly into the hold of the vessel. Therefore, the operations of these fisheries lends itself to using EM to verify that all catch are retained and brought to port which catch is sampled under an existing portside monitoring program. The goal of the study is to determine the utility of EM for use in this fishery and information learned will help inform the Councils and NMFS in prospective approval and implementation processes.

Data Management Systems and Cooperative Research Branch have recently developed electronic reporting software for the surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries (SFOQ), and are supplying the software and training to the majority of these fleets. Transitioning to electronic reporting will allow for easier error checking resulting in higher data quality for these fisheries, as well as supplying fishery managers with more timely and higher-resolution data for more fine-scale analysis.

Maintain and Enhance Electronic Reporting and Ecosystem Monitoring in Mid-Atlantic and Southern New England Trawl and Gillnet Fisheries

Previous support through the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission provided funds for external partners that have equipped and trained over 70 vessels to use the NEFSC-developed Fisheries Logbook Data Recording System (FLDRS) software for electronic Vessel Trip Reporting (eVTR). With the FLDRS program accounting for the vast majority of all electronic eVTRS that have been successfully transmitted to date, this project will provide additional field support to transition another 60 vessels in the Mid-Atlantic and Southern New England into operational eVTR reporting. Though eVTR can be accomplished with as minimal equipment as an onboard laptop, previous experience has shown that field support to install the necessary software and provide user training and troubleshooting services is invaluable in recruiting and retaining eVTR participants. The FLDRS software has recently been upgraded to resolve technical difficulties experienced with earlier versions, and is ready for release to vessels currently using the software and new vessels who can be encouraged to use it.

In addition to trip-level eVTR reporting, this project is recruiting an additional 15 vessels into the NEFSC’s Cooperative Research Study Fleet. Study Fleet vessels receive a small annual stipend to collect more detailed fishery-dependent data than is required by current Vessel Trip Reports (paper or electronic). The FLDRS software

the noaa fisheries navigator · the noaa fisheries navigator see cod, page 2 this supplement...

Documents