vilmos a. valko and a. peter johnson

1
PDB: 2vu3 Score: -8.16 PDB: 2vtq Score: -8.32 PDB: 2vtp Score: -7.94 Structures very similar to med. chem. optimization end results were also generated having slightly lower estimated scores in SPROUT-HitOpt Vilmos A. Valko and A. Peter Johnson School of Chemistry University of Leeds Leeds, LS2 9JT Keymodule Ltd. www.keymodule.co.uk [email protected] +44 113 343 6595 Readily synthesizable putative ligand structures Reliable high yielding reactions Synthetic Knowledge Base Pool of readily available starting materials Fragment Library fuse spiro new bond SPROUT Built in / user defined reactions: • Amide formation • Ether formation • Ester formation • Amine alkylation • Reductive amination • etc. SynSPROUT Ease of synthesis is a key factor in drug development Build synthetic constraints into structure generation process VIRTUAL SYNTHESIS IN RECEPTOR CAVITY SynSPROUT Scheme List of reactions (between functional groups) Synthetic Knowledge Base Simulate synthetic reaction in the 3D context of receptor site R 23 R 13 CORE R 12 R 22 R 33 R 32 R 31 R 11 R 21 Multiple low energy conformers + detected functional groups Core Structure Monomer Library General Scheme S NH 2 Cl O O NH 2 HO O NH 2 H N Cl OH O HO OH O All possible core + monomer combinations are generated S O O NH HO S O O NH O H N H N H N OH O H N O CORE H N OH O CORE S O O NH HO CORE S O O NH O H N H N CORE S O O NH HO CORE S O O NH O H N O CORE SPROUT Family SPROUT Sophisticated de novo design tool Design new hit compounds from scratch within the active site of your target Build structures using imported fragments – recore as standard feature Excellent synergy with fragment-based hit discovery Predicts binding affinity and synthetic feasibility (via complexity analysis) Proven record of success SPROUT-HitOpt Optimize hit compounds with the target’s active site Synthetic constraints ensure only synthetically accessible structures are generated Two modes of optimization – Core Extension and Monomer Replacement SynSPROUT Generate synthetically accessible ligands by virtual chemistry within protein cavity Use a library of readily available starting materials (monomers) Editable reaction knowledge base SynSPROUT Approach Core Extension in SPROUT-HitOpt Optimization of a CDK2 fragment based on indazole [1] Synthetic Knowledge Base CHEMICAL-LABEL <Carboxylic Acid> C[SPCENTRE=2](=O)-O[HS=1] CHEMICAL-LABEL <Primary Amine> C-N[HS=2];[CONNECTION=1] Steps of formation Hybridization changes Bond type Bond length Dihedral penalty/angle Steps of Joining Rules RULE Amide Formation IF Carboxylic Acid INTER Primary Amine THEN delete-atom 3 change-hybridization 5 to SP2 form-bond - between 1 and 5 DIHEDRAL-ATOMS 2154 DIHEDRAL 00 BOND-LENGTH 1.35 END-THEN O OH H 2 N HN O + 1 2 3 4 5 Identification of reactive functional groups as possible extension points Adding monomers from a user-defined monomer library at the extension points via synthetic reactions Scoring the binding affinity of each core + monomer product to automatically select the best scored conformations Monomer Replacement in SPROUT-HitOpt Identification of monomers through retrosynthetic analysis Replacing the monomers by similar ones taken from a user-defined monomer library, making use of a pre-built structure-based hierarchy of the monomers to improve efficiency Scoring the binding affinity of the modified structures O N H N OH O OH N OH H 2 N Br H 2 N Br Cl O N H N OH Cl Cl Starting Structural Motif Retrosynthetic Analysis Monomers Replace monomeric units by superstructure fragments, redock and rescore Find superstructures of monomers in hierarchy Superstructures [1]: P. G. Wyatt et al. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 16. N H N MW = 118 IC 50 = 185 μM LE = 0.57 Asp145 Asp86 Leu134 Leu83 Phe82 Glu81 Phe80 Lys33 Core Structure Original Hit Manually introduce functional groups Primary amine Carboxylic acid N N OH O NH 2 Monomer Library Generated from Maybridge and Sigma Aldrich compound databases 8334 Carboxylic Acids 6773 Primary Amines 4674 Secondary Amines Core Extension with restriction on movement of pyrazole 3648 combinations were generated Binding affinity score: -8.53 Binding affinity score: -8.61 Two results with high binding affinity score and LE after Core Extension (HO) 2 B (HO) 2 B Cl Monomer Replacement 49,544 structures were generated Two results with high binding affinity score and LE after Monomer Replacement Starting Structural Motif Optimization of a CDK2 fragment based on pyrazole [1] Score: -8.53 LE: 0.29 Score: -8.28 LE: 0.26 Score: -8.80 LE: 0.31 Score: -8.77 LE: 0.29 Amide Formation Reductive Amination Sulphonamide Formation Synthetic Knowledge Base N H N NH NH O O HN N NH O N H F O F F HN N NH O N H O F F NH HN N NH O N H O Cl Cl NH

Upload: others

Post on 18-Oct-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Vilmos A. Valko and A. Peter Johnson

PDB: 2vu3Score: -8.16

PDB: 2vtqScore: -8.32

PDB: 2vtpScore: -7.94

Structures very similar to med. chem. optimization end results were alsogenerated having slightly lower estimated scores in SPROUT-HitOpt

Vilmos A. Valko and A. Peter Johnson

School of ChemistryUniversity of Leeds

Leeds, LS2 9JT

Keymodule Ltd.

www.keymodule.co.uk

[email protected]

+44 113 343 6595

Readily synthesizableputative

ligand structures

Reliable highyielding

reactions

SyntheticKnowledge

Base Pool of readilyavailablestarting

materials

FragmentLibrary

fuse

spiro

newbond

SPROUT Built in / user definedreactions:• Amide formation• Ether formation• Ester formation• Amine alkylation• Reductive amination• etc.

SynSPROUT

Ease ofsynthesis

is a keyfactor

in drugdevelopment

Buildsyntheticconstraints

intostructure

generationprocess

VIRTUAL SYNTHESISIN

RECEPTOR CAVITY

SynSPROUT Scheme

List of reactions (betweenfunctional groups)

SyntheticKnowledge Base

Simulatesynthetic

reaction inthe 3D

context ofreceptor

site

R23

R13

CORER12

R22

R33R32R31

R11

R21Multiple low energyconformers +detected functional groups

Core Structure

Monomer Library General Scheme

S

NH2

ClOO

NH2

HO O

NH2

HN

ClOHO

HO

OH

O

All possible core +monomer combinations

are generated

S

OO

NH

HO

S

OO

NH

O

HN

HN

HN

OH

O

HN

O

CORE

HN

OH

O

CORE

S

OO

NH

HO

CORE

S

OO

NH

O

HN

HN

CORE

S

OO

NH

HO

CORE

S

OO

NH

O

HN

OCORE

SPROUT FamilySPROUT Sophisticated de novo design tool Design new hit compounds from scratch within the active site of your target Build structures using imported fragments – recore as standard feature Excellent synergy with fragment-based hit discovery Predicts binding affinity and synthetic feasibility (via complexity analysis) Proven record of success

SPROUT-HitOpt Optimize hit compounds with the target’s active site Synthetic constraints ensure only synthetically accessible structures are generated Two modes of optimization – Core Extension and Monomer Replacement

SynSPROUT Generate synthetically accessible ligands by virtual chemistry within protein cavity Use a library of readily available starting materials (monomers) Editable reaction knowledge base

SynSPROUT Approach

Core Extension in SPROUT-HitOpt Optimization of a CDK2 fragment based onindazole [1]

Synthetic Knowledge Base

CHEMICAL-LABEL <Carboxylic Acid>C[SPCENTRE=2](=O)-O[HS=1]CHEMICAL-LABEL <Primary Amine>C-N[HS=2];[CONNECTION=1]

Steps of formation Hybridization changes Bond type Bond length Dihedral penalty/angle

Steps of Joining Rules

RULE Amide FormationIF Carboxylic Acid INTER Primary AmineTHEN delete-atom 3

change-hybridization 5 to SP2form-bond - between 1 and 5

DIHEDRAL-ATOMS 2 1 5 4DIHEDRAL 0 0BOND-LENGTH 1.35END-THEN

O

OH

H2N

HN

O

+1

2

3

4

5

Identification of reactive functional groups as possible extension points Adding monomers from a user-defined monomer library at the extension pointsvia synthetic reactions Scoring the binding affinity of each core + monomer product to automaticallyselect the best scored conformations

Monomer Replacement in SPROUT-HitOpt Identification of monomers through retrosynthetic analysis Replacing the monomers by similar ones taken from a user-defined monomerlibrary, making use of a pre-built structure-based hierarchy of the monomers toimprove efficiency Scoring the binding affinity of the modified structures

O

NH

N

OH

O

OH

N

OH

H2N

Br

H2N

Br

Cl

O

NH

N

OH

ClClStarting Structural Motif

Retrosynthetic Analysis

Monomers

Replace monomeric units bysuperstructure fragments,

redock and rescore

Findsuperstructuresof monomers

in hierarchy

Superstructures

[1]: P. G. Wyatt et al. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 16.

NH

N

MW = 118IC50 = 185 μMLE = 0.57

Asp145Asp86

Leu134

Leu83

Phe82Glu81

Phe80

Lys33

Core StructureOriginal Hit

Manuallyintroducefunctional

groups

Primaryamine

Carboxylicacid

N NOH

ONH2

Monomer Library

Generated from Maybridge andSigma Aldrich compounddatabases

8334Carboxylic Acids

6773Primary Amines

4674Secondary Amines

Core Extension withrestriction onmovementof pyrazole

3648 combinationswere generated

Binding affinity score: -8.53 Binding affinity score: -8.61

Two results with high binding affinity score and LE after Core Extension

(HO)2B (HO)2B

Cl

MonomerReplacement

49,544structures were

generated

Two results with high binding affinity score and LE after Monomer Replacement

Starting Structural Motif

Optimization of a CDK2 fragment based onpyrazole [1]

Score: -8.53LE: 0.29

Score: -8.28LE: 0.26

Score: -8.80LE: 0.31

Score: -8.77LE: 0.29

Amide FormationReductive AminationSulphonamide Formation

SyntheticKnowledge Base

NH

N

NH NH

O

O

HN N

NHO

NH

F

O

F F

HN N

NHO

NH

O

F F

NH

HN N

NHO

NH

O

Cl Cl

NH