19 mistake proofing techniques

Upload: sigmaval

Post on 16-Oct-2015

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    1/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 1 The British Standards Institution 2008

    Mistake Proofing Techniques

    2

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Learning Objectives

    At the end of this section delegates will be able to:

    Explain the role of Mistake Proofing within Lean Six Sigma

    Recognise that defects can be eliminated (100% of thetime)

    Understand that Mistake Proofing should be focused onprocess steps that rely on operator vigilance andconcentration

    Recognise that simple, low cost devices can be the mosteffective solutions

    Use a simple process for implementing a Mistake Proofingsystem

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    2/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 2 The British Standards Institution 2008

    3

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    History of Error Proofing

    Dr Shigeo Shingo attributed with developing the methods

    Originally called Idiot Proofing but recognised that this label

    could offend workers so changed to Mistake Proofing (Poka

    Yoke in Japanese)

    Literally translated

    Yokeru: to avoid

    Poka: inadvertent errors

    Target of Zero Defects and elimination of QC Inspection

    4

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Human Error

    Humans make mistakes (errors) because of

    - Forgetfulness - Misunderstanding

    - Lack of experience/skills - Lack of concentration

    - Laziness - Lack of standards

    - Rushing - Taking short cuts

    - Malicious intent (deliberate action)

    Errors (can) lead to defects

    Defects are not inevitable and can be eliminated by the useof simple, low cost methods zero defects

    Mistake Proofing should take over repetitive tasks thatdepend on vigilance or memory

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    3/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 3 The British Standards Institution 2008

    5

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Types of Error

    Four main types of error:

    Processing

    1. Omitted Processing - Step in process not carried out

    Eg form not checked, discount not included, invoice not sent, hole not drilled,part not cleaned

    2. Processing Errors - step in process carried out incorrectly

    Eg wrong discount included, invoice sent to wrong address, hole drilled in wrongplace

    Materials

    3. Missing materials/information

    Eg form not filled out completely, order not complete, screw left out4. Wrong materials/information

    Eg wrong form filled out, wrong information supplied, wrong screw used

    6

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Shutdown Process

    Control Process

    Warn Operator

    Shutdown Process

    Control Flow

    Warn Operator

    Functions of Poka Yoke

    EliminateDefects

    Predict Defect(about to occur)

    Detect Defect(occurred)

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    4/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 4 The British Standards Institution 2008

    7

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    ABC Fix Explanation Scenario

    The Problem:

    Automobiles are crossing the

    train tracks and getting hit by

    a train.

    The C Fix:

    Place flashing cross signs at

    the crossing to alert vehicles.

    Dilemma: Vehicles are alerted

    of oncoming trains but can still

    cross. Problem not solved.

    8

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    ABC Fix Explanation Scenario

    The B Fix:

    Place cross gates at crossing to furtherdeter crossing of vehicles.

    Dilemma: Vehicles are alerted and have

    limited crossing ability; however doesnot prevent those who arbitrarily want tocross. Problem deterred but not solved.

    The A Fix:

    Build overpass for vehicles to crosstrain tracks without incident.

    Dilemma: None. Problem solved.

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    5/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 5 The British Standards Institution 2008

    9

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Blade can stay outwithout operatortouching it

    Sharp point

    Rounded point

    Spring loaded--when operatorlets go, the bladegoes back in

    Guard protecting bladeonly releases when

    button is pushed

    Extra safety guardsmake it difficult toaccidentally contact blade

    Original Box Cutter

    Safety Example

    10

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Elevators

    Some common safety features are listed below:

    Doors sensors detect if an object/person is blocking

    entrance, if so they automatically open

    2 separate braking systems used. The first is opened by

    electrical current, if power is lost the brake closes underhigh spring tension. The second is a centrifugal brake

    governing the maximum speed

    A host of switches and sensors control the positioning of

    the elevator

    Acceleration/deceleration alters with weight in carriage

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    6/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 6 The British Standards Institution 2008

    11

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Medicine (Bottles)

    Up to one in five toddlers canopen medicine bottles andchemical containers, even if theyhave child-resistant tops

    Every year 25,000 under-fives aretaken to casualty, suspected ofswallowing substances rangingfrom medicines to householdcleaning products

    One in five are admitted tohospital for treatment

    Child-resistant tops are nowcommonplace on most medicinebottles and household chemicals -but they are child-resistant, notchild-proof

    Source BBC News

    12

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Electrical (Household)

    RCD (Residual Current Device)

    Automatically cuts off power supply if a leakage current to ground isdetected

    Mains Socket

    Earth pin first to make and last to break contact

    Earth pin has to enter socket to move protective shields from Live andNEUTRAL connections

    Shape prevents incorrect fitment

    3 Pin Plug

    Only fits one way round

    Ergonomically designed so it is picked up by the case

    Insulation on Live and Neutral to prevent accidental touching of pins

    If wired correctly and plug pulled out by cable, Live first to pull out,Neutral second, Earth last

    Fuse standard for plug no other fuses will fit. Maximum fuse size 13 amp

    If cover is not in place pins push back and cannot enter socket

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    7/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 7 The British Standards Institution 2008

    13

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Electrical (General) Shapes and colours extensively used to prevent equipment

    being incorrectly connected

    14

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Appliances

    Microwave

    Will not work until the door is shut

    Washing machine

    Will not start until door is closed

    Will not allow door to be opened until cycle is

    complete

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    8/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 8 The British Standards Institution 2008

    15

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Low Brake Pad WarningIndicators Brake pad wear indicators are fitted to

    most modern cars. They are made upof 2 insulated wires which fit in a holeinside the brake pad

    As brake pads wear the insulatedcables become exposed and themetal brake disk connects them like aswitch

    An electrical signal then lights up awarning lamp on the cars dashboardalerting the driver before the brakesfail

    16

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Using Shapes and Colours

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    9/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 9 The British Standards Institution 2008

    17

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Software Warnings andReminders

    18

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Using Dialogue Boxes andSoftware Checks

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    10/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 10 The British Standards Institution 2008

    19

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Using Switches and AutomaticBraking Safety switches need to be pressed and held before the start

    levers will operate.

    Upon release of start lever, brakes automatically come on stoppingthe cutting blades etc

    Safety interlocks or light beams used to automatically shut down orstop processes

    20

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Using Checklists

    Backup generator functional6

    Generator voltage (Min 220v Max 250V)5

    Hydraulic pressure (Min 30 bar Max 40

    bar)

    4

    Ailerons functional3

    Altimeter calibration (+50 Metres)2

    Fuel level (min 1500 Max 2500)1

    Pre-flight Checklist

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    11/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 11 The British Standards Institution 2008

    21

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Visual Prevention Methods

    Some solutions are better

    than others

    Which signs would be the

    most successful in

    preventing different

    nationalities entering the

    incorrect toilet?

    Ladies Gents

    22

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Using Lights, Sounds, Signsand Barriers

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    12/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 12 The British Standards Institution 2008

    23

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Amsterdam Airport: Problem-AirportCleanliness

    Target Practice?!

    Error Proofing and FMEA Complimentary Techniques?

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    13/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 13 The British Standards Institution 2008

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    History of FMEA

    First used in the 1960s in the aerospace industry

    during the Apollo missions

    In 1974, the US Navy developed MIL-STD-1629

    regarding the use of FMEA

    In the late 1970s, driven by product liability costs,

    FMEA moved into U.S automotive applications

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    FMEA Inputs and Outputs

    Inputs

    Process map

    Process history

    Process technical procedures

    Outputs

    List of actions to prevent causes or to detect failure

    modes

    History of actions taken

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    14/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 14 The British Standards Institution 2008

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    FMEA Team

    Team approach is necessary

    Responsible black/green belt leads the team

    Recommended representatives:

    Operators/administrators/supervisors

    Design

    Engineering

    Operations

    Distribution

    Finance

    Information Technology

    Human Resources

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Process

    Step/InputPotential Failure Mode Potential Failure Effects

    S

    E

    V

    Potential Causes

    O

    C

    C

    Current Controls

    D

    E

    T

    R

    P

    N

    Actions

    Recommended

    0 0 0 0

    0 0 0 0

    0 0 0 0

    0 0 0 0

    0 0 0 0

    What istheinput ?

    Whatcan gowrongwiththe

    input?

    Whatcan bedone?

    What isthe

    effecton the

    output?

    What arethe causes?

    How

    bad?

    How

    often?

    How

    well?

    (1-10) (1-10) (1-10)

    Completing an FMEA

    How are

    these foundor

    prevented?

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    15/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 15 The British Standards Institution 2008

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Definition of Terms - Failure Mode

    Definition

    The way a specific process input fails

    Will cause the effect to occur if not corrected orremoved

    Examples

    Temperature too high

    Incorrect PO number

    Surface contamination

    Dropped call (customer service)

    Paint too thin

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Definition of Terms - Effect

    Definition

    Impact on customer requirements

    Generally an external customer focus, but can also includedownstream processes

    Examples

    Temperature too high: paint cracks

    Incorrect PO number: accounts receivable traceability errors

    Surface contamination: poor adhesion

    Dropped call: customer dissatisfaction

    Paint too thin: poor coverage

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    16/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 16 The British Standards Institution 2008

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Definition of Terms - Cause

    Definition

    Sources of process variation that cause the failure mode tooccur

    Identification of causes starts with failure modes associatedwith the highest severity ratings

    Examples

    Temperature too high: thermocouple out of calibration

    Incorrect PO number: typographical error

    Surface contamination: overhead hoist systems Dropped call: insufficient number of CS representatives

    Paint too thin: high solvent content

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Definition of Terms - CurrentControls

    Definition

    Systematised methods / devices in place to prevent ordetect failure modes or causes (before causing effects)

    Prevention consists of failsafing, automated control andsetup verifications

    Controls consist of audits, checklists, inspection,laboratory testing, training, SOPs, preventivemaintenance, etc

    Which is more important to process:

    improvement, prevention or detection?

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    17/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 17 The British Standards Institution 2008

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Definition of Terms - Risk PriorityNumber (RPN)

    Definition

    The output of an FMEA

    A calculated number based on information you provide, regarding:

    Potential failure modes,

    Effects, and

    Current ability of the process to detect the failures before reaching the

    customer

    Calculated as the product of three quantitative ratings, each one

    related to the effects, causes, and controls:

    RPN = Severity X Occurrence X Detection

    Effects

    Effects Causes

    Causes Controls

    Controls

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Risk Priority Number

    Risk Priority Number is not absolute

    Scaling for severity, occurrence and detection can

    be locally developed

    Be aware of customer requirements

    Other categories can be added

    For example, one engineer added an impact score to

    the RPN calculation to estimate the overall impact of the

    failure mode on the process

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    18/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 18 The British Standards Institution 2008

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Definition of Terms

    Severity (of Effect)(1 = Not Severe, 10 = Very Severe)

    Importance of effect on customer requirements

    Could also be concerned with safety and other risks if failure occurs

    Occurrence (of Cause)(1 = Not Likely, 10 = Very Likely)

    Frequency with which a given cause occurs and creates failuremode(s)

    Can sometimes refer to the frequency of a failure mode

    Detection (Capability of Current Controls) (1 = Likely to Detect,

    10 = Not Likely at all to Detect) Ability of current control scheme to detect or prevent:

    The causes before creating failure mode

    The failure modes before causing effect

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Example Rating Scale

    Rating Severity of Effect Likelihood of Occurrence Ability to Detect

    10 Haz ardous without warningVery high:

    Cannot detect

    9 Hazardous with warningFailure is almost inevitable

    Very remote chance of detection

    8 Loss of primary functionHigh:

    Remote chance of detection

    7Reduced primary function

    performance

    Repeated failuresVery low chance of detection

    6 Loss of secondary functionModerate:

    Low chance of detection

    5Reduced secondary function

    performance

    Occasional failuresModerate chance of detection

    4Minor defect noticed by most

    customers

    Moderately high chance of

    detection

    3Minor defect noticed by some

    customers Low:High chance of detection

    2Minor defect noticed by

    discriminating customers

    Relatively few failuresVery high chance of detection

    1 No effect Remote: Failure is unlikely Almost certain detection

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    19/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 19 The British Standards Institution 2008

    37

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Process

    Step

    Key Process

    Input

    Failure Modes -What can go

    wrong? Effects Causes

    Current

    Controls

    Pour into

    glassBeer volume Overflow

    Wasted Beer/

    Wet LapDrunk None

    Glass too small Visual

    Not paying

    attentionNone

    Too much foam

    Bad Taste /

    Don't get as

    drunk

    No tilt Visual

    Pouring too highVisual and operator

    training

    Pouring too fastVisual and operator

    training

    No Foam

    No beer

    mustache/ Poor

    taste

    Fla t beer Expiration date

    Tilted glass Visual

    S low Pour Ope ra tor tra ining

    Empty glass No drink Too drunk None

    Broken Glass Visual

    No Money

    Job / Process

    Excellence - big

    bonus

    No Friends Personality

    A Well-Loved Process FMEA

    38

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    FMEA Hints

    Keep it simple; not complex (no wall charts)

    Must involve a team, no lone ranger

    development

    Update it as you move through the roadmap

    Make sure the FMEA is an action tool, not just a

    document; use the right half of the tool

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    20/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 20 The British Standards Institution 2008

    39

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    POKA YOKE Connection to the FMEA

    Process

    Step/InputPotential Failure Mode Potential Failure Effects

    S

    E

    V

    Potential Causes

    O

    C

    C

    Current Controls

    D

    E

    T

    R

    P

    N

    Actions

    Recommended

    What is the

    process step/

    Input under

    investigation?

    In what ways does the Key

    Input go wrong?

    What is the impact on the Key

    Output Variables (Customer

    Requirements) or internal

    requirements?

    How

    Severeisthe

    effecttothe

    cusotmer?What causes the Key Input to

    go wrong?

    How

    oftendoescause

    orFMo

    ccur?What are the existing controls and

    procedures (inspection and test)

    that prevent eith the cause or the

    Failure Mode? Should include an

    SOP number.

    How

    wellcanyou

    detectcauseorFM? What are the actions

    for reducing the

    occurrance of the

    Cause, or improving

    detection? Should

    have actions only on

    high RPN's or easy

    fixes.

    0

    0

    0

    Good POKA YOKE devices drive down

    occurrence and detection rankings.

    40

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 1Process: Tightening nuts

    Problem: Washers left out before tightening

    Description of process: Operator adds washer and nut, then tightens usingan automatic nut driver.

    Prevent Error/Detect Error

    Shutdown/Control/Warn

    Before improvement: It is possible

    to tighten the nuts even if washersare missing.

    After Improvement:

    Solution:

    (Delete as appropriate)

    (Delete as appropriate)

    Nut, tightened withno washer

    Nut driver

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    21/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 21 The British Standards Institution 2008

    41

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 2Pprocess: Parts Transport LineProblem: Parts supplied upside down toautomatic machinery

    Description of Process: A transportation chute feeds parts from a press into the nextprocess. in the next process parts are mounted in the same position as they arrive.

    Prevent Error/Detect Error

    Shutdown/Control/Warn

    Before Improvement: Operators watchincoming work pieces carefully and removeupside down parts. some are alwaysoverlooked.

    After Improvement:

    Solution:

    (Delete as appropriate)

    (Delete as appropriate)

    Upside DownCorrect Work piece

    42

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 3Process: Inspecting Cassette Tape Decks

    Problem: Inspection Tapes out of Sequence

    Description of Process: When a cassette deck is inspected, the inspector uses a series of cassettesto check the performance of the unit. It is important that the tests are performed in the correct order andthat all tests are done.

    Prevent Error/Detect Error

    shutdown/control/warn

    Before Improvement: A slotted rack wasused to store tapes. If a tape was placed onworkbench or carried off then inspector couldlose track and make errors.

    After Improvement:

    Solution:

    (Delete as appropriate)

    (Delete as appropriate)

    1 2 3 4 5 67

    Storage Rack

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    22/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 22 The British Standards Institution 2008

    43

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 4

    The inspectors foundmedical notes wereconfusing written upwith the same RRinitials for womenneeding a routine recalland those needing arecall recall, an urgent

    reassessment!!!

    44

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 5

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    23/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 23 The British Standards Institution 2008

    45

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 6

    46

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 7

    City Trader buys $1000000000 worth of shares

    instead of $10,000,000.00!

    Accounts pays supplier twice

    Failure to invoice customer for services provided

    Miscalculation in currency exchange

    Your experiences..?

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    24/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 24 The British Standards Institution 2008

    47

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Summary

    Defects can be eliminated

    Target process steps that are repetitive and rely

    on operator vigilance and checking

    Use simple, low cost devices

    Involve the operator in identifying, developing and

    implementing devices

    Devices should be challenge tested by

    introducing error (defect)

    Solutions

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    25/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 25 The British Standards Institution 2008

    49

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 1Process: Tightening Nuts

    Problem: Washers left out before tightening

    Description of Process: Operator adds washer and nut, then tightensusing an automatic nut driver.

    Prevent Error/Detect Error

    Shutdown/Control/Warn

    Before Improvement: It is possibleto tighten the nuts even if washersare missing.

    After Improvement:

    Solution:

    (Delete as appropriate)

    (Delete as appropriate)

    Nut, tightened withno washer

    Nut driver Nut driverStopper

    Washerthickness

    50

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 2Process: Parts transport lineProblem: Parts supplied upside down toautomatic machinery

    Description of Process: A transportation chute feeds parts from a press into the nextprocess. In the next process parts are mounted in the same position as they arrive.

    Prevent Error/Detect Error

    Shutdown/Control/Warn

    Before improvement: Operators watchincoming work pieces carefully and removeupside down parts. Some are alwaysoverlooked.

    After Improvement:

    Solution:

    (Delete as appropriate)

    (Delete as appropriate)

    Upside downCorrect Work piece

    Notch

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    26/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 26 The British Standards Institution 2008

    51

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 3Process: Inspecting Cassette Tape Decks

    Problem: Inspection tapes out of sequence

    Description of Process: When a cassette deck is inspected, the inspector uses a series of cassettesto check the performance of the unit. It is important that the tests are performed in the correct order andthat all tests are done.

    Prevent Error/Detect Error

    Shutdown/Control/Warn

    Before Improvement: A slotted rack wasused to store tapes. If a tape was placed onworkbench or carried off then inspector couldlose track and make errors.

    After Improvement:

    Solution:

    (Delete as appropriate)

    (Delete as appropriate)

    1 2 3 4 5 67

    Storage rack

    52

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 4

    The inspectors foundmedical notes wereconfusing written upwith the same RR

    initials for womenneeding a routine recalland those needing arecall recall, an urgentreassessment!!!

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    27/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 27 The British Standards Institution 2008

    53

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 5

    54

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 6

  • 5/26/2018 19 Mistake Proofing Techniques

    28/28

    Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

    SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 28 The British Standards Institution 2008

    55

    SSG06101ENUK Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

    Poka Yoke Workshop 7

    City Trader buys $1000000000 worth of shares

    instead of $10,000,000.00!

    Accounts pays supplier twice

    Failure to invoice customer for services provided

    Miscalculation in currency exchange

    Your experiences..?