MINUTES:  of  the  7th  regular  meeting  of  the  90th  SRC  held  on  Wednesday  1st  August.  Meeting  held  in  the  Refectory  Room,  Quadrangle  Building.    

   

A.   Meeting  open  at  6:45  pm    

A1.  Election  of  Deputy  Chairperson  The  Chair  proposed  that  Nina  Dillon  Britton  be  elected  Deputy  Chairperson.  Moved:  William  Edwards  Seconded:  Maya  Eswaran  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.  

 B.   Acknowledgement  of  Country  

 The  University  of  Sydney  Students’  Representative  Council  acknowledges  the  traditional  owners  of  this  land  (Sydney),  the  Gadigal  people  of  the  Eora  nation.  We  stand  on  this  land  today  as  beneficiaries  of  an  uncompensated  and  unreconciled  dispossession  that  occurred  over  200  years  ago.  Many  of  the  descendants  of  those  dispossessed  live  just  down  the  road  in  abject  poverty,  and  as  young  people  it  is  important  to  recognise  how  this  history  of  dislocation  and  disenfranchisement  has  contributed  to  the  inequality  we  observe  in  modern  society.  We  acknowledge  both  our  privilege  and  our  obligation  to  redress  the  situation  as  best  we  can:  to  remember  the  mistakes  of  the  past,  act  on  the  problems  of  today,  and  build  a  future  for  everyone  who  now  calls  this  place  home,  striving  always  for  genuinely  practical  and  meaningful  reconciliation.  

 C.   Apologies,  Proxies  and  Leaves  of  Absence  

 Apologies  were  received  from:  James  Gibson  Caitlin  McMenamin  Chanum  Torres  Aaron  Yi  Hao  Zhou    Proxies:  Steven  Wu  to  Mengwei  Yuan  Timothy  Berney-­‐Gibson  to  Dane  Luo    Bella  Pytka  to  James  Newbold  Tim  Seguna  to  Jack  Abadee  Pranay  Jha  to  Nina  Dillon  Britton    

- 2 -

   at  8:28  William  Edwards  left  and  proxies  to  Lara  Sonnenschein      

D.   Changes  to  Membership    

E.   Electoral  Report    E1.  Consideration  of  any  resignations  Mengwei  Yuan  and  Zhuonan  Li  resign  as  International  Students’  Officer  Jazzlyn  Breen  resigns  from  her  role  as  Queer  Officer    Motion:  That  the  Council  accept  the  resignations.  Moved:  Liam  Thorne    Seconded:  Winston  Ma  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.    E2.  Suspensions  Suspension  of  Yi  Man,  Kida  Lin,  and  Yuxuan  Yang.    Yuxuan  Yang  spoke  to  his  suspension  saying  he  was  unwell  and  had  gone  back  home  to  China  promising  to  attend  all  remaining  meetings      Yi  Man  apologised  for  not  attending  the  meetings  said  he  would  attend  all  meetings  from  now  on.  Kida  Lin  was  no  present  to  speak  to  his  absences.    Motion  to  expel  Kida  Lin  from  council  Moved:  Jazzlyn  Breen  Seconded:  Seth  Dias    The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.    motion  to  list  Yuxuan  Yang’s  suspension  Moved:  Dane  Luo  Seconded:  Will  Edwards  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.    Motion  to  lift  the  suspension  of  Yi  Man  Moved:  Yuxuan  Yang  Seconded:  Dane  Luo  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.    

F.   Minutes  of  the  previous  Council  meeting.    Minutes  of  the  5th  regular  meeting  of  the  89th  SRC  held  on  6th  June  were  circulated.    Motion:  that  the  minutes  of  the  6th  June  be  accepted.  Moved:  Winston  Ma  

- 3 -

Seconded:  Seth  Dias  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.    

G.   Business  Arising  from  the  Minutes  There  was  no  business  for  this  item.  

 H.   Question  Time  of  15  minutes,  which  may  be  extended  by  resolution  for  a  further  15  minutes.  

 Procedural  motion  to  move  straight  to  L3.  The  President’s  report.  Moved:  Imogen  Grant  Seconded:  William  Edwards  The  procedural  was  put  and  CARRIED.    

The  President  deferred  the  Chair  to  the  Deputy  Chairperson.    L3.  President’s  Report  Imogen  Grant  tabled  a  written  report:  

 O-­‐Day      Over  the  break  the  SRC  has  been  working  hard  over  the  break  help  students  with  academic  appeals  and  show  cause.  I  have  also  spoken  at  a  number  of  Orientation  events  to  ensure  that  new  students  know  about  the  SRC.  The  stall  was  a  success  with  many  OBs  petitioning  and  running  campaigns  on  Books  Not  Bombs  and  Keep  Ramsay  out  of  USYD.      Radical  Education  Week      Rad  Ed  week  will  spotlight  some  of  the  ('radical')  knowledges  that  are  created,  mobilised  and  sustained  outside  of  academic  institutions,  by  collectives,  community  activists,  and  many  others.  If  you're  critical  or  uncomfortable  about  the  privileged  role  of  academic  institutions  in  generating  knowledge  today,  or  if  you've  ever  been  skeptical  about  using  an  academic  platform  to  dismantle  oppressive  structures,  then  Rad  Ed  Week  is  for  you!      Political  cartoonist  Sam  Wallman  has  created  a  new  logo  for  Radical  Education  Week  which  we  will  be  launching  this  week  (see  below).    

 

- 4 -

We  are  in  the  midst  of  finalising  the  workshop  streams.  Some  standouts  include  ‘Fighting  for  your  rights:  unions  and  your  right  to  strike’,  ‘Queer  agendas:  a  radical  analysis  of  gender,  sexuality  and  liberation’,  ‘The  Radical  Unionism  of  the  NSW  Builders  Labourers'  Federation’,  ‘Just  transitions  and  the  climate  struggle’,  ‘No  pride  in  police:  a  history  of  police  gay  bashings’,  and  ‘Non  Violent  Direct  Action  101’.  We  are  also  co-­‐hosting  a  range  of  workshops  with  the  NTEU.      If  you’re  interested  in  hosting  a  workshop  or  panel  discussion,  please  get  in  touch  with  myself  or  Nina  Dillon  Britton,  or  fill  out  the  EOI  here:  https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScEt4-­‐HHJxq_iwOM6IYJU8yoJzpsovVhm9eFnGTIHIZZG_gGA/viewform.      Camera,  film  software  etc.      The  SRC  Publications  Department  have  purchased  a  new  camera,  microphone,  tripod,  studio  lights  etc.  that  student  activists  can  use.  One  of  the  Publications  Managers,  Amanda,  is  available  to  provide  training  to  activists  in  how  to  shoot  quality  interviews  and  outdoor  shots.    We  also  have  Adobe  Premier  Pro  installed  onto  the  Honi  computers  and  can  show  you  the  basics  of  using  the  software.    As  a  result,  we  now  have  an  equipment  loan  procedure  with  front  office,  whereby  students  need  to  do  a  brief  introduction  on  equipment  use  and  safety  prior  to  being  able  to  loan  equipment.    •  Learn  how  to  set-­‐up  and  use  the  lights  and  backdrop  equipment  •  Learn  basic  camera  and  sound  skills  •  Learn  basic  editing  using  Adobe  Premier  Pro  •  Learn  how  to  publish  your  videos  for  the  use  you  require    EQUIPMENT  available  to  loan  1  x  Camera  +  Tripod  1  x  Microphone  2  x  studio  lights  with  stands  and  reflectors  1  x  studio  backdrop  kit    Standalone  Sexual  Assault  Policy  and  Online  Reporting  Portal    The  University  of  Sydney  has  developed  an  online  portal  for  students  to  report  their  experiences  of  sexual  assault,  and  has  been  criticised  by  student  representatives  as  “unethical  and  irresponsible”  due  to  a  series  of  egregious  flaws.  The  portal  was  thrown  together  in  less  than  a  month  in  order  to  be  released  in  time  for  the  anniversary  of  the  Australian  Human  Rights  Commission  ‘Change  the  Course’  report.    The  portal  times  out  after  ten  minutes,  meaning  that  if  a  survivor  takes  a  break  from  recounting  their  experiences  to  get  a  cup  of  tea  or  go  to  the  bathroom,  then  all  their  information  will  be  deleted  from  the  server  and  they  will  have  to  start  the  reporting  process  again.      Reporting  your  assault  to  the  University  can  be  very  retraumatising  and,  therefore,  it  is  normal  for  survivors  to  want  to  take  breaks  and  tell  their  story  over  multiple  sittings.  Management  went  as  far  to  suggest  that  students  take  screenshots  of  the  portal,  paste  them  into  a  word  document,  fill  

- 5 -

out  the  questions  in  a  word  document  and  then  copy  and  paste  them  back  into  the  portal  in  order  to  circumnavigate  the  time  limit.  We  will  see  an  enormous  attrition  rate  of  people  accessing  the  portal  but  never  finishing  their  report  as  they  will  be  forced  to  write  an  account  of  their  rape  in  a  single  sitting  without  breaks.    It  also  sets  word  limits  on  survivor’s  stories,  only  current  students  and  staff  can  lodge  reports,  and  has  no  clear  safeguards  around  which  staff  can  access  the  portal’s  sensitive  data.      Finally,  the  portal  also  asks  survivors  for  their  gender,  sexuality  and  post-­‐assault  therapeutic  history.  This  is  an  intrusion  and  irrelevant  to  how  the  University  processes  the  complaint.  Students  should  not  feel  like  their  ability  to  lodge  a  complaint  is  conditional  on  their  willingness  to  have  their  privacy  violated.  Asking  about  therapeutic  history  is  as  appropriate  as  asking  about  what  medical  services  they  might  have  accessed  post-­‐assault  such  as  STI  testing  or  abortion.  The  primary  purpose  of  the  reporting  portal  is  for  survivors  to  lodge  complaints  -­‐  not  to  survey  them  for  internal  data  analysis  purposes.    The  Students’  Representative  Council  pushed  for  the  University  to  delay  the  release  of  the  portal  and  to  consult  with  experts  and  staff  in  its  development.  University  management  failed  to  act  on  any  of  the  major  concerns,  instead  pushing  ahead  with  releasing  the  portal.    By  rushing  to  a  portal  fraught  with  problems,  the  University  is  prioritising  the  press  announcement  and  cheap  reputational  wins  above  doing  the  job  properly.    We  have  gone  to  the  media  with  the  story.  As  of  writing  this  report  there  have  been  stories  on  this  botched  portal  in  The  Australian  and  The  Sydney  Morning  Herald.      Claiming  unpaid  pay    I  am  working  with  the  Casework  Manager,  James,  on  creating  resources  on  how  to  claim  your  unpaid  time  from  your  boss.    This  happens  all  the  time,  some  examples  of  this  include:      

•   Having  to  serve  customers  until  your  rostered  finish  time  despite  then  having  to  close  tills  etc.    

•   Completing  tasks  for  short  periods  after  a  rostered  finish.    •   Nightfill  or  early  start  staff  being  required  to  open/shut  the  store  before/after  their  actual  

shit  times.    •   Not  receiving  paid  rest  breaks.    •   Many  others!    

 Number  of  councilors        S  3(a)  of  the  SRC  constitution  says:      “The  number  of  representatives  shall  be  calculated  by  providing  for  one  representative  for  every  one  thousand  (1000),  students  enrolled  in  an  undergraduate  degree,  or  part  thereof,  and  if  the  result  is  an  even  number  by  then  raising  that  number  to  the  next  odd  number,  provided  that  the  

- 6 -

number  of  representatives  shall  be  no  less  than  twenty  nine  (29).”    The  latest  USyd  annual  report  (2017)  records  just  over  34,000  undergrads—which  means  the  number  of  councillors  should  potentially  be  35—two  more  than  the  current  33.    The  undergraduate  population  has  been  over  33,000  since  2012  (33,008  as  recorded  in  the  2012  USyd  report,  published  April  2013).  The  undergraduate  student  population  has  grown  every  year  since  then    S  3(b)  of  the  SRC  constitution  says:      “The  Electoral  Officer  shall  determine  each  year  prior  to  the  Annual  Elections  in  September,  the  number  of  Representatives  under  subsection  (a)  above,  and  the  number  so  determined  shall  remain  unchanged  until  the  next  Annual  Elections.”    William  Edwards  spoke  to  the  report  specifically  on  the  council  numbers,  and  that  they  should  not  be  increased  both  because  the  nomination  for  this  year’s  elections  have  opened  and  also  that  the  council  is  too  large  already.      Jazzlyn  Breen  spoke  to  the  report  and  said  she  was  for  the  changes  to  the  council  numbers.    Karen  Chau  spoke  to  this  and  said  that  phrasing  of  the  clause  is  not  clear  and  is  difficult  to  ascertain  the  meaning  in  both,  whether  it  can  be  applied  this  election,  or  just  next  election.  As  such  she  is  hesitant  to  raise  them  this  year  without  that  clarification.      Vinil  Kumar  spoke  to  the  motion  and  said  that  it  was  important  that  students  were  properly  represented  and  there  is  nothing  for  stopping  this  change  from  happening,  he  was  in  favor  of  adjusting  the  numbers.      Nina  Dillon  Britton  said  she  agreed  with  Vinil  Kumar,  and  that  the  nomination  process  would  not  be  affected  only  how  many  of  them  got  elected.

Imogen  Grant  said  that  the  decision  was  the  Electoral  Officer’s  (EO)  and  that  the  EO  takes  direction  from  the  Council

The  Secretary  to  Council  Julia  Robins  clarified  that  the  EO  does  not  take  lead  or  answer  to  the  council  as  situated  in  the  constitution  and  regulations.      Vinil  Kumar  asked  how  a  change  would  be  conveyed  to  the  council.

Karen  Chau  said  that  she  would  make  a  decision  tonight  contact  the  president  with  the  outcome.      Motion  to  accept  the  report  of  the  President.  Moved:  Seth  Dias  Seconded:  William  Edwards  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.  

   

- 7 -

I.   Visitor’s  Business  Karen  the  EO  spoke  to  the  Council  introducing  herself  to  the  council  an  asked  if  they  have  any  questions.  She  also  gave  the  council  the  EO  email  address,  saying  she  was  happy  to  receive  emails  on  that  and  will  attempt  to  respond  within  24  hours.  During  campaigning,  she  will  be  available  Monday  to  Friday  9-­‐5.  Karen  encouraged  everyone  to  nominate  as  soon  as  possible  and  asked  if  there  were  any  questions.    There  were  no  questions.    

J.   Report  of  the  Undergraduate  Fellow  of  Senate  There  was  no  report  from  the  Undergraduate  Fellow  of  Senate  

 K.   Elections    

K1.  Election  of  1  Queer  Officer    Nomination  received  from  Jazz  Breen  Nominated:  William  Edwards  Seconded:  Maya  Eswaran  There  being  no  other  nominations  Jazzlyn  Breen  was  declared  elected  unopposed    K2.  Election  of  1  International  Students’  Officer    Joint  nomination  received  from  Mengwei  Yuan  and  Jai  Shen  Nominated:  Yuanan  Young  Seconded:  Winston  Ma  There  being  no  other  nominations  Mengwei  Yuan  and  Jai  Shen  were  declared  elected  unopposed  

   

L.   Report  of  the  President  and  Executive    

L1.    Executive  Minutes  There  were  no  minutes  of  the  Executive    

 L2.  Report  of  the  Executive  

Report  of  the  executive  from  the  6th  June  –  31st  July  2018.    

Motion  to  accept  the  report  of  the  Executive.  Moved:  Maya  Eswaran  Seconded:  Seth  Dias  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.  

 M.   Report  of  the  Vice-­‐Presidents    

Adriana  Olguin  Malavisi  tabled  a  written  report:    

- 8 -

It’s  been  a  very  busy  few  weeks.  I’ve  been  focusing  primarily  on  organizing  Welfare  Week,  and  although  it  is  not  as  big  as  I  envisioned,  it’s  no  small  feat.  Student  welfare  is  something  we  don’t  focus  enough  on,  and  it’s  something  which  is  very  important  and  severely  lacking  at  our  university.  The  University  of  Sydney  is  well  known  for  its  lack  of  support  services  and  poor  student  welfare.  I’m  aware  that  things  such  as  welfare  week  don’t  fix  these  issues-­‐  they  don’t  tackle  the  deeply  rooted  issues  within  the  University  that  are  disadvantaging  students,  but  they’re  a  good  first  step.    While  also  using  the  SRC  as  a  platform  to  lobby  the  University  for  better  student  support  services,  an  increase  in  funding  and  proper  training,  and  an  expansion  and  de-­‐centralization  of  services,  we  must  also  provide  the  resources  for  students  who  need  it  now.  This  is  why  I  decided  to  run  welfare  week  to  begin  with,  and  I’m  proud  of  the  way  it’s  turning  out.  As  far  as  organizing,  Welfare  Week  has  been  a  very  tough  but  enlightening  job.  It’s  given  me  a  greater  look  into  the  many  issues  students  struggle  with,  but  it’s  also  given  me  hope  by  showing  me  the  wonderful  work  people  are  doing.  After  inviting  a  number  of  organizations,  we’ve  got  people  like  Unions  NSW,  Twenty10,  the  NUS,  as  well  as  materials  from  ACon,  and  Rape  and  Domestic  Violence  Services.  We’ll  be  having  events,  hopefully  hosted  by  some  of  the  collectives,  and  as  many  people  involved  as  possible.  A  volunteer  form  has  been  put  up  on  the  SRC  Facebook  page  and  linked  in  the  OB  group  for  those  of  you  keen  to  get  involved.  I  really  hope  more  office  bearers  get  involved,  it  would  be  great  to  have  a  good  volunteer  turnout  at  the  stall,  and  I  would  hope  all  office  bearers  support  such  an  initiative.  I  also  hope  that  this  is  just  the  first  of  many  of  these  weeks  to  come.  I  hope  to  see  Welfare  Week  grow  bigger  every  year,  and  hopefully  taken  more  seriously.  I’m  aware  that  there  was  not  a  lot  of  money  allocated  to  such  an  event  this  year,  and  I  worked  with  whatever  I  could  as  it  was  my  fault  for  not  securing  funds  earlier  in  the  year,  but  I  hope  as  the  initiative  grows,  so  does  its  budget.  As  well  as  welfare  week,  I  also  helped  Karen  Chau  and  her  co-­‐organizer  with  getting  the  SRC  involved  in  Radical  Sex  and  Consent  Week.  I’m  very  excited  for  this  week  as  well  and  hope  to  see  a  lot  of  you  there.      Adriana  Olguin  Malavisi  spoke  to  her  report  encouraging  everyone  to  get  involved.    Nina  Dillon  Britton  asked  for  a  clarification  is  CAPS  were  attending  or  sending  materials.    Adriana  Olguin  Malavisi  clarified  that  they  would  be  attending.    

Motion:  that  the  report  of  the  Vice  President  be  accepted.  Moved:  Thomas  Manousaridis  Seconded:  Dane  Luo  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.      N.   Report  of  the  General  Secretaries  

Nina  Dillon  Britton  and  Yuxuan  Yang  tabled  a  written  report  and  the  Annual  Budget.    Budget  is  attached  at  the  end  of  this  document.     Budget 2018 Report

1.   The budget has a small surplus, we’re very proud of this.

- 9 -

2.   We’ve increased our NUS affiliation contribution by $1000 to $64 300. If this budget is passed, it will be the first time the SRC has increased its affiliation fee since before VSU. They’re apparently very excited about this.

3.   We have budgeted for the hiring of a new research officer for the Casework Department. This new officer will better represent students’ interests to the ever more complex behemoth of the University’s management; be able to help office bearers with research for key campaigns; and pursue research projects concerning students’ interests such as affordable housing, welfare benefits and student services.

4.   There are substantial training budgets for both the Legal Service and Casework Department.

a.   This will allow the Casework team to send at least two caseworkers to a international student focused conference at the end of this to better equip themselves with skills to support international students and face the unique challenges that arise for these students.

b.   This will also allow the Legal Service to be able to enrol themselves in a number of online courses that will equip them with skills.

5.   Now for some of the less sexy, but equally important items: a.   We’ve been able to budget for 2 weeks of casual cover for the Administration

Department. This allows the smooth operation of the SRC, allowing students to easily access our vital support services.

b.   There is a new server for the SRC. Our old one was very, very, old. Includes new server $15,221.27.

c.   A new database system for the Legal Service to better organise their caseload.

6.   We were able to commit an additional $650 to the Office Bearers this year. We were unfortunately unable to give everyone exactly what they asked for, as the total amount requested by Office Bearers was more than $20,000 more than that, and we didn’t get an increase in SSAF this year that would allow us to do that.

7.   In dividing this up we took into account three key things: a.   The amount that was requested by OBs and what it was specifically for.

Printing is not included in your budgets, so that was discounted, as was requests for some campaign materials such as canvas and paint that the SRC provides at OB’s requests. Please just ask the front desk if you need these to be re-stocked.

b.   The amount that collective had spent that year – to help estimate how much more money it would need to remain as active as it had been.

c.   The amount of money it received in the past – because this is what many OBs have been working from in budgeting their year.

d.   The amount of money that collective spent last year – to allow us to understand how much money that collective has required in the past for its activities.

8.   Finally we have included a substantial Council Resources Pool for three reasons: a.   Firstly, this council has already spent more than was allocated last year to

the “Executive Expenses” line item. That’s due to investments in shared resources such as the new marquee, which has been used by a number of collectives already and because this Council has passed spending itself.

- 10 -

b.   Secondly, it allows a pool of resources that collectives can apply for where they overspend their budget amount to access. This will still be approved and overseen by the Executive, but allows OBs of particularly active collectives to be able to pursue important campaigns and projects.

c.   Finally, it provides a resource that any councillor, office bearer, member of the executive or indeed member of the SRC can apply for. This provides more equitable access to the SRC’s pool of funding, whilst still being overseen by the council and the executive. To those departments that did not get a budget, this is where funding may be applied for.

   Nina  gave  a  quick  overview  of  the  Budget.      Lily  Campbell  understood  that  some  collectives  asked  for  a  bigger  printing  budget  as  it  is  currently  capped  and  that  while  printing  shouldn’t  be  capped  why  is  ACAR  getting  such  a  lage  budget  when  she  has  seen  no  evidence  they  are  doing  anything.      Jessica  Syed  replied  to  Lily  Campbell  that  this  is  probably  because  she  is  not  a  member  of  ACAR.    Lily  Campbell  replied  asking  why  they  were  getting  so  much  compared  to  Global  Solidarity  who  do  more.      Nina  Dillon  Britton  said  that  the  allocation  were  based  on  the  number  of  activities  they  had  done  in  semester  one  and  their  funding  applications.  Adding  that  Global  Solidarity  and  Social  justice  has  received  a  funding  increase  this  year.  Adding  the  General  Secretaries  have  tried  to  predict  activity  according  to  past  activity  but  those  projections  may  be  wrong.      Madeline  Ward  asked  if  a  collective  wanted  to  dispute  their  allotment  what  would  the  procedure  be?  Or  would  they  need  to  apply  though  the  collective  pool  for  funding?    Nina  Dillon  Britton  Said  it  would  come  from  the  council  pool  and  there  would  reallocation  where  budgets  weren’t  spent.    Dane  Luo  thanked  the  General  Secretaries  for  their  detailed  explination  of  the  budget  and  asked  why  Sexual  Harassment  was  such  a  small  budget  considering  it  was  such  a  prevalent  issue  and  asked  the  same  with  Student  Housing.    Nina  Dillon  Britton  clarified  that  they  didn’t  not  apply  for  funding  and  that  for  the  Sexual  Harassment  Office  much  of  the  work  is  done  with  the  women’s  collective,  with  student  housing  it  was  based  of  their  budget  application.      Connor  Wherrett  asked  about  the  finances  saying  that  UTS  is  always  putting  away  savings  and  this  budget  uses  up  all  its  sundry.        Nina  Dillon  Britton  said  she  was  not  aware  of  UTSSA  processes  but  their  budget  is  much  larger  than  the  SRC’s  and  more  like  that  of  the  USU.  Adding  that  this  is  something  to  be  thought  about  but  there  is  very  little  room  for  movement  on  such  a  small  budget.  

- 11 -

 Madeline  Ward  noted  that  they  have  spent  their  budget  on  Growing  Strong  and  O-­‐Week  alone.    Nina  Dillon  Britton  clarified  that  O-­‐week  shirts  and  publication  did  not  come  out  of  the  collective’s  budget.    Madeline  Ward  noted  concern  about  what  will  happen  when  they  need  more  funding  and  the  procedures  that  will  be  required  for  that,  and  will  it  result  in  a  lack  of  autonomy.      Nina  Dillon  Britton  said  that  she  would  have  preferred  to  have  more  consultation  with  collectives  but  some  budget  requests  were  only  received  this  afternoon.  Adding  that  while  the  budget  is  $400  smaller  than  last  years  applying  for  resource  pool  funding  is  the  same  process  as  any  funding  application.      George  Bishop  thanked  the  General  Secretaries  for  the  budget  but  noted  they  mentioned  paying  the  legal  fees  of  activists  from  a  motion  that  had  failed.      It  was  clarified  that  the  example  way  hypothetical  and  those  fees  has  not  been  paid.      Lily  Campbell  asked  why  the  fees  were  not  paid  when  it  had  been  voted  on  again  and  passed.      Julia  Robins  the  Secretary  to  Council  clarified  that  the  motion  was  deemed  invalid  and  could  have  only  been  voted  on  if  a  rescind  motion  has  been  put,  and  none  had  been  therefore  the  motion  had  failed.        Dane  Luo  asked  why  Welfare  week  was  not  receiving  funding.    Nina  Dillon  Britton  replied  that  none  had  been  requested.      

 Motion:  that  the  report  of  the  General  Secretaries  and  the  budget  be  accepted.  Moved:  Liam  Thorne  Seconded:  Seth  Dias  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED    

N1.  Report  of  the  Standing  Legal  Committee    The  Standing  Legal  Committee  found  no  constitutional  issues  regarding  the  proposed  amendments.  [in  motions  1  and  2]    

Motion:  that  the  report  of  the  Standing  Legal  Committee  meeting  be  accepted.  Moved:  Liam  Thorne  Seconded:  Dane  Luo  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED      O.   Report  of  Committees  and  Officers  

- 12 -

 O1.  Report  of  the  Education  Officers Lily  Campbell  gave  a  verbal  report    Edcon    

•   Books  not  Bombs  campaign  was  launched  across  campus  around  Australia,  this  is  its  official  launch  is  this  week  

•   We  are  focusing  on  the  Ramsay  centre  at  the  moment,  this  is  exemplarity  of  the  dangers  of  the  neoliberal  universities  and  how  they  will  take  money  from  everywhere  regardless  of  compromise.    

•   ran  a  workshop  on  how  to  disarm  to  your  university    SOS  

•   Ran  a  workshop  at  SOS  on  the  disarm  campaign    Ramsey  Centre  

•   There  will  be  a  forum  for  staff  and  students  on  the  Ramsey  Centre  next  week        

EAG  •   Meeting  today  to  plan  semester  •   Have  a  Zine  on  the  way  

   Motion:  that  the  report  of  the  Education  Officers  be  accepted.    Moved:  Liam  Thorne    Seconded:  Maya  Eswaran  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED    

O2.  Report  of  the  Wom*n’s  Officers       Madeline  Ward  gave  a  verbal  report    Madeline  Ward  spoke  to  the  issues  that  have  arisen  around  misconduct  and  that  the  collective  was  still  active  and  meeting  regularly.  She  spoke  about  how  the  safe  access  bill  showed  that  issues  of  decimalisation  are  still  going  to  be  difficult  to  manage  but  that  issues  around  healthcare  access  are  better  received.    Lily  Campbell  asked  that  in  relation  to  the  coming  state  election  the  collective  would  be  putting  pressure  on  the  labour  party  to  bind  on  decimalisation?    Madeline  Ward  responded  saying  this  would  be  difficult  as  there  are  people  like  Greg  Donnelly  who  has  attacked  her  personally  in  parliament  in  the  Labor  Party  who  are  unlikely  to  bind  on  that  issue.      

Motion:  that  the  report  of  the  Wom*n’s  Officers  be  accepted.  Moved:  Maya  Eswaran  

- 13 -

Seconded:  Lily  Campbell  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED    Procedural  motion  to  add  a  Queer  Officers  Report  moved:  Jazzlyn  Breen  Seconded:  Maya  Eswaran  The  procedural  was  put  and  CARRIED    

O3.  Report  of  the  Queer  Officers    

Things  we  have  done    

Film  screening    Queer  Honi    Banner  paints    On  and  off  campus  activism/  protests  Weekly  meetings    200+  collective    Sent  people  to  QC    40  years  of  Mardi  Grass  conference    Attended  other  collectives  events  e.g.  sexual  assault  rally  today    

PLANS  FOR  SEM  TWO    

Mardi  grass  schemes  à  cops  and  corporations  out  of  pride,  have  spoken  to  78ers  about  this,  have  a  collective  group  which  we  are  working  with,  ray  and  I  have  got  funding  to  become  members  of  the  board    

Ramsey  Centre  protest  engagement  –  Western  Civilisation  has  left  its  mark  on  queer  people  all  around  the  world.  (homophobia  as  a  result  of  imperialism  in  Africa,  Australia  etc.)    

Continued  support  of  refugee  activism  (especially  for  queer  refugees)  

Motion:  that  the  report  of  the  Queer  Officers  be  accepted.  Moved:  William  Edwards  Seconded:  Seth  Dias  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED    

P.   Special  Business  There  were  no  items  of  special  business.    

Q.   Motions  of  Notice  Q1.  Changes  to  Regulations  Part  8  Section  15  (c)  Highlighted  in  red  is  what  has  been  changed    Current:  

- 14 -

(c)   For  the  Annual  Elections,  the  following  times  will  be  adhered  to:  (i)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  outside  Fisher  Library  between  the  hours  of  

8:45am  and  5:15pm  on  both  days  of  polling;  (ii)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  outside  the  Jane  Foss  Russell  Building  between  

the  hours  of  8:45am  and  5:15pm  on  both  days  of  polling;  (iii)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  at  Manning  House  between  the  hours  of  

10:45am  and  3:15pm  on  both  days  of  polling;  (iv)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  at  the  Cumberland  College  of  Health  Sciences  

between  the  hours  of  9:45am  and  2:15pm  on  both  days  of  polling;  (v)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  at  the  Conservatorium  of  Music  between  the  

hours  of  9:45am  and  2:15pm  on  the  first  day  of  polling;    (vi)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  at  the  Peter  Nicol  Russell  (PNR)  Building  between  

the  hours  of  11:45am  and  2:15pm  on  the  first  day  of  polling;  (vii)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  at  the  Sydney  College  of  the  Arts  between  the  

hours  of  9:45am  and  2:15pm  on  the  second  day  of  polling.    Amendment:      (c)   For  the  Annual  Elections,  the  following  times  will  be  adhered  to:  

(i)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  outside  Fisher  Library  between  the  hours  of  8:45am  and  6:30pm  on  the  first  day  of  polling  and  8:45am  and  6:00pm  on  the  second  day  of  polling;  

(ii)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  outside  the  Jane  Foss  Russell  Building  between  the  hours  of  8:45am  and  6:00pm  on  both  days  of  polling;  

(iii)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  at  Manning  House  between  the  hours  of  10:45am  and  3:15pm  on  both  days  of  polling;  

(iv)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  at  the  Cumberland  College  of  Health  Sciences  between  the  hours  of  10:30am  and  2:15pm  on  both  days  of  polling;  

(v)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  at  the  Conservatorium  of  Music  between  the  hours  of  12:30pm  and  2:30pm  on  the  first  day  of  polling;    

(vi)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  at  the  Peter  Nicol  Russell  (PNR)  Building  between  the  hours  of  11:30am  and  2:30pm  on  the  first  day  of  polling;  

(vii)   A  polling  booth  shall  be  established  at  the  Sydney  College  of  the  Arts  between  the  hours  of  12:30pm  and  2:30pm  on  the  second  day  of  polling.  

   

Imogen  Spoke  to  the  motion  noting  that  they  would  not  be  implemented  this  year.  Adding  that  she  should  like  there  to  be  more  consultation  with  the  factions  before  these  are  voted  on.    Vinil  Kumar  spoke  in  favour  of  the  changes  in  motions  1  and  2.    

 Maya   Eswaran   agreed   with   Vinil   Kumar   and   Imogen   and   felt   they   should   be   held   over   till   next   year’s  council.      There  being  no  mover  or  seconder  the  motion  LAPSED.    

- 15 -

Q2.  Changes  to  Regulations  Part  8  Section  27  (j)  Highlighted  in  red  is  what  has  been  changed    Current:    (j)   The  EO  shall  be  responsible  for  creating  an  exclusion  zone  of  no  less  than  a  ten  (10)  metres  

radius  from  all  ballot  boxes,  within  which  no  person  shall  display  any  poster,  distribute  leaflets  or  solicit  votes,  or  impede  without  just  cause  the  conduct  of  the  election.  For  the  purpose  of  this  regulation,  impeding  the  conduct  of  the  election  will  include  physically  blocking,  or  causing  to  be  stopped,  any  potential  voter  immediately  outside  the  exclusion  zone.  

 Amendment:    (j)   The  EO  shall  be  responsible  for  creating  an  exclusion  zone  of  at  least  five  (5)  metres  radius  

from  all  ballot  boxes  subject  to  the  EO’s  discretion  and  with  consideration  to  the  safety  of  students,  staff,  and  the  public.  Within  this  space  no  person  shall  display  any  poster,  distribute  leaflets  or  solicit  votes,  or  impede  without  just  cause  the  conduct  of  the  election.  For  the  purpose  of  this  regulation,  impeding  the  conduct  of  the  election  will  include  physically  blocking,  or  causing  to  be  stopped,  any  potential  voter  immediately  outside  the  exclusion  zone.  

 There  being  no  mover  or  seconder  the  motion  LAPSED.    Q3.  Campaign  for  Books  Not  Bombs  and  to  Disarm  USYD!    Preamble  USyd  SRC  activists  attended  the  National  Union  of  Students  Education  Conference  last  week  in  Adelaide.  The  main  purpose  of  the  conference  was  to  discuss  the  new  national  campaign  of  NUS,  called  Books  Not  Bombs.  This  campaign  is  about  highlighting  the  racist  militarism  of  the  Australian  government,  which  is  responsible  for  death  and  destruction  overseas  and  draws  billions  of  dollars  away  from  public  services  like  health  care,  welfare  and  higher  education.  Already  this  year,  higher  education  funding  has  been  cut  by  $2.2  billion  which  includes  a  cap  on  Commonwealth-­‐supported  places,  while  $3.8  billion  has  gone  to  weapons  manufacturers  to  boost  their  exports,  $35  billion  on  a  new  fleet  of  frigates,  $7  billion  on  drones  and  $5  billion  on  tanks.  The  HECS  repayment  threshold  has  been  reduced  to  a  mere  $45,000  annual  income  to  raise  more  money  for  these  crimes.  USyd  SRC  has  already  held  a  successful  campus  rally  on  March  21  to  highlight  these  issues.      Work  on  the  USyd  campus  wing  of  the  campaign,  Disarm  USYD,  has  already  begun.  Disarm  USYD  seeks  to  highlight  the  links  between  our  university  through  investment,  research  and  personnel  to  major  defence  corporations.  Chancellor  Belinda  Hutchinson  sits  on  the  board  of  Thales  Australia,  and  USyd’s  investment  portfolio  includes  substantial  investments  in  Honeywell  and  Lockheed  Martin.  Additionally,  USyd’s  negotiations  with  the  Ramsay  Centre  to  set  up  a  degree  for  Western  Civilisation  shows  another  connection  with  racist  corporate  interests  that  will  come  at  the  cost  of  student  choice  and  academic  freedom.      

- 16 -

This  semester,  Disarm  USyd  will  campaign  against  the  Ramsay  Centre  negotiations  and  demand  USyd  divest  from  defence  companies.  It  will  organise  the  USyd  leg  of  the  National  Launch  Week  of  Books  Not  Bombs  beginning  August  6,  when  a  national  report  will  be  released  detailing  all  findings  about  university  ties  with  military  corporations.      Platform  

1.   The  SRC  endorses  the  campaign  of  the  National  Union  of  Students  for  Books  Not  Bombs.    a.   The  SRC  condemns  the  increase  to  defence  spending  and  recognises  that  the  

Australian  government  is  complicit  in  wars  overseas  and  increasing  military  tensions.  

b.   The  SRC  demands  that  the  federal  government  increases  the  higher  education  budget  to  provide  for  free  and  fully-­‐funded  tertiary  education.    

2.   The  SRC  supports  the  work  of  its  education  activists  on  the  campaign  to  Disarm  USYD.  a.   The  SRC  condemns  the  investment,  research  and  personnel  ties  between  USyd  and  

companies  like  Thales  Australia,  Lockheed  Martin  and  Honeywell  and  demands  that  the  University  cut  these  connections.    

   Action  

1.   The  SRC  will  participate  in  the  National  Launch  Week  of  Books  Not  Bombs  beginning  on  August  6.  To  promote  the  National  Launch  Week,  including  the  findings  of  the  national  report  and  events,  the  SRC  will:  

a.   use  its  social  media  outlets;  b.   reach  out  to  its  members  through  its  contact  lists;  c.   contact  relevant  media  outlets  to  cover  the  Week;  d.   ensure  coverage  in  Honi  Soit.  

2.   Specifically,  the  SRC  will:  a.   promote  and  attend  the  forum  hosted  by  the  Education  Action  Group  and  the  

NTEU  to  oppose  the  Ramsay  Centre  degree  for  Western  Civilisation  on  Wednesday  August  8;    

b.   promote  and  attend  a  stunt  being  organised  for  the  Launch  Week  to  highlight  USyd’s  complicity  in  war.    

   Gina  Elias  spoke  to  the  motion  highlighting  the  amount  that  has  been  spent  on  military  spending  and  the  companies  that  are  contributing  to  universities.  Adding    that  Belinda  Hutchinson  sits  on  the  board  of  one  of  the  arms  companies  with  ties  to  the  university.  She  encouraged  everyone  to  support  the  motion.    Kim  waved  her  speaking  rights  to  Maddie  Clarke    Maddie  Clarke  spoke  the  motion  saying  that  it  was  a  good  campaign  and  was  building  to  a  national  campaign.  She  encouraged  everyone  to  vote  for  the  motion.    Lara  Sonnenschein  spoke  to  the  motion  saying  that  she’s  not  going  to  repeat  herself  and  that  disarm  ANU  had  a  protest  in  Canberra  over  a  meeting  of  arms  developers  there  and  encouraged  everyone  to  get  involved  in  the  campaign.      

- 17 -

Adriana  Olguin  Malavisi  spoke  against  the  motion  saying  there  was  an  issue  with  platform  2  of  the  motion.  Adriana  Olguin  Malavisi  added  that  private  partnerships  are  often  how  the  university  gets  funding  to  do  medical  and  physics  research,  and  that  this  positive  reseach  can’t  bedone  without  their  funding  support.      Thomas  Manousaridis  spoke  against  the  motion  calling  free  education  a  joke  and  that  this  shows  the  wrong  priorities  and  a  focus  on  middle  class  welfare.  Arguing  that  a  focus  on  pushing  against  the  lowering  of  the  HECS  pay  back    threshold  would  be  a  better  campaign.      Lara  Sonnenschein  read  out  previously  motions  that  has  been  passed  with  similar  aims  saying  that  there  is  no  consistence  with  those  arguing  against  it.      Adriana  Olguin  Malavisi  did  not  agree  with  elements  of  the  motion  particularly  platform  2  a.      Lara  Sonnenschein  said  this  is  no  different  to  the  motion  condemning  “partnerships”  they  supported  earlier  in  the  year.      Adriana  Olguin  Malavisi  said  she  did  not  believe  she  or  her  faction  would  have  supported  that  motion.  And  if  they  did  she  does  not  agree  with  that  decision.          Lily  Campbell  spoke  in  support  of  the  motion  at  said  that  the  argument  that  education  was  middle  class  welfare  was  “disgusting”  and  that  the  majority  of  student  were  form  working  class  families.  Adding  that  most  people  with  degrees  do  not  go  into  the  upper  echelons  of  society  but  the  general  workforce  as  often  a  degree  is  a  basic  requirement.  Adding  that  she  had  spoken  to  Adriana  about  this  and  didn’t  know  why  she  would  think  that  companies  profiting  from  murder  are  good  to  work  with  on  medical  research.      Jazzlyn  Breen  said  that  while  labor  right  like  to  talk  about  the  working  class  they  do  so  like  they  are  a  homogenous  group.  Adding  that  she  comes  from  a  working  class  family  and  they  language  used  by  unity  is  not  representative  of  her  experiences  and  speak  more  to  their  lack  of  understanding  of  the  needs  of  these  communities.  And  that  many  people  are  forced  into  role  by  their  circumstances  not  desire.      Nina  Dillon  Britton  agreed  and  echoed  Lily  Campbell’s  comments  adding  that  it  is  those  who  insist  on  those  skills  to  employ  people  who  should  be  paying  a  higher  amount  of  taxes  so  that  people  can  get  those  qualifications,  adding  that  international  students  aren’t  covered  by  HECS  so  can’t  be  included  in  a  middle  class  welfare  argument.      James  Newbold  noted  that  the  impact  of  HECS  debt  occurs  when  people  have  to  start  paying  it  off  adding  that  he  thinks  it  can  be  agreed  that  research  tainted  with  corporate  funding  isn’t  good  research.      Adriana  Olguin  Malavisi  responded  to  Jazzlyn  Breen’s  comments  saying  it  was  presumptuous  to  know  what  her  and  her  factions  backgrounds  were.      Jazzlyn  Breen  said  that  Adriana  Olguin  Malavisi  failed  to  address  any  political  point  and  simply  employed  identity  politics.    

- 18 -

 Jack  Manson  spoke  in  support  of  the  motion  and  Jazzlyn  Breen’s  comments  adding  that  it  is  working  class  people  are  pushed  into  jobs  to  survive  it’s  not  a  choice  and  when  we  apply  this  to  war  it  is  the  working  class  who  are  conscripted  while  the  rich  get  out  of  service.      

Moved:  Gina  Elias  Seconded:  Kim  Murphy  The  motion  was  put  and  FAILED  the  count  was  noted  at  9  for  10  against  and  4  abstentions.    

   Q4.  SAVE  THE  ABC!  PUBLIC  BROADCASTER  IN  PUBLIC  HANDS!    Preamble:  In  June  the  60th  Federal  Council  of  the  Liberal  Party  voted  to  privatise  the  ABC  and  in  the  most  recent  federal  budget  $83m  was  cut  from  the  public  broadcaster.  This  has  lead  to  job  cuts  and  cuts  to  programming  with  the  most  recent  loss  being  ‘The  Checkout’,  a  popular  comedic  consumer  affairs  program.    The  ABC  has  often  been  a  balanced  shining  light  in  a  right  wing,  corporate  media  landscape.  Flagship  current  affairs  programs  such  as  Four  Corners,  Lateline  and  7.30  have  been  key  in  reporting  on  the  big  issues  facing  Australia  and  the  world.  Exposing  and  highlighting  issues  such  as  government  corruption,  the  deplorable  conditions  international  students  face  at  university,  rape  on  campus,  wage  theft,  the  rise  of  racism  and  the  far  right,  income  inequality  and  the  housing  crisis  the  ABC  has  been  critical  in  bringing  student  issues  to  light.  In  addition  to  the  incredibly  important  and  valuable  reporting  the  ABC  does  it  is  the  standard  bearer  for  the  arts  and  TV  in  Australia.  From  platforming  suppressed  voices  through  programs  like  Redfern  Now  and  Riot,  to  supporting  music  through  triple  J  and  Rage  the  ABC  is  central  to  Australia’s  cultural  fabric  and  is  something  we  can’t  afford  to  lose  or  privatise.  Platform:  

1.   The  SRC  believes  in  the  public  ownership  and  proper  funding  of  the  ABC  2.   The  SRC  notes  how  important  the  ABC  is  for  rural  and  regional  communities.  Particularly  

ABC  radio.  3.   The  SRC  acknowledges  that  the  ABC  is  central  to  a  functioning  democracy  4.   The  SRC  supports  the  ABC  being  central  to  story  telling,  music,  arts,  comedy,  children’s  

programming,  current  affairs  and  culture  in  Australia.  5.   Michael  Rowland  and  Virginia  Trioli  are  just  better  journalists  and  breakfast  TV  hosts  than  

Sam  and  Kochie  Action:  

1.   The  SRC  will  support  and  attend  any  actions  in  the  Save  the  ABC  campaign  being  spearheaded  by  several  organisations  including  GetUp!  And  the  MEAA  

2.   The  SRC  will  publicise  Save  the  ABC  content  on  it’  Facebook  page  when  appropriate      

Jack  Mansell  spoke  to  the  motion  saying  that  while  he  doesn’t  see  the  ABC  as  particularly  progressive  it  is  important  to  maintain.      Hersha  Kadkol  spoke  in  favour  of  the  motion  saying  she  was  against  the  privatisation  of  any  public  

- 19 -

resource  but  agreed  with  Jack  Mansell  that  it  is  not  inherently  progressive  and  have  use  dog  whistle  tactics  in  their  journalism.  Adding  that  she  thinks  Triple  J’s  Hack  with  Tom  Tilly  is  a  terrible  show  that  encourages  racists  by  legitimising  them.      Kim  Murphy  spoke  to  the  motion  saying  it  is  deplorable  when  the  government  cuts  funding  to  public  services  but  agreed  that  the  ABC  is  not  progressive  and  this  motion  is  naïve.  Adding  that  many  of  its  shows  like  QandA  are  supposed  to  be  democratic  but  will  not  allow  proper  debate.    Manning  Jeffery  spoke  against  the  motion  saying  that  an  organisation  that  relies  on  public  funding  will  always  skew  left  wing.  And  looks  forward  to  the  privatisation  of  the  ABC.      George  Bishop  spoke  against  the  motion  saying  the  ABD  was  bias  to  the  left  wing  and  that  the  journalists  were  overpaid.  Adding  that  Triple  J  is  not  a  good  radio  station  and  that  the  only  programing  that  should  be  supported  is  the  rural  programming  as  they  need  public  funding.  George  Bishop  noted  he  will  abstain  from  the  motion.      

Moved:  Harry  Gregg  Seconded:  Tom  Manousaridis  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED    

Q5.  STOP  THE  CUTS!  FUND  EDUCATION:    Preamble:  In  the  latest  federal  budget  the  Turnbull  Liberal/National  government  has  taken  another  sledge  hammer  to  higher  education  and  Sydney  University  has  had  funding  cut  again.  The  2018/19  federal  budget  means  the  following  for  Sydney  University  Students:  

•   A  fresh  cut  of  $62m  from  Sydney  University  alone.  •   A  decline  of  2.8%  in  public  funding.  •   Students  will  have  to  start  repaying  HECS  when  they  earn  $44,999.  This  is  only  roughly  

$6,500  above  the  full  time  adult  minimum  wage.  These  disgraceful  attacks  on  students  from  the  federal  government  must  be  opposed  at  every  turn.  They  will  impoverish  students,  saddle  them  with  higher  debt  sooner  and  lock  them  out  of  education.      Platform:  

1.   The  Sydney  University  SRC  condemns  the  Turnbull  Government  for  yet  again  cutting  tertiary  education  funding.  

2.   The  SRC  calls  for  fully  funded  and  free  university  education  for  all  students,  both  domestic  and  international.    

3.   The  SRC  acknowledges  these  cuts  disproportionally  affect  LGBTI  students,  women  students,  students  of  colour,  Aboriginal  and  Torres  Strait  Islander  students,  working  class  students  and  students  from  rural  and  regional  areas.    

4.   The  SRC  acknowledges  the  need  for  a  strong  national  campaign  against  these  attacks  on  higher  education.    

Action:  1.   The  SRC  will  include  its  opposition  to  these  cuts  in  education  campaigns  in  semester  2.  

- 20 -

2.   The  SRC  will  support  the  NUS  ‘Bury  the  Bill’  campaign  which  seeks  to  fight  these  changes  that  will  be  voted  on  in  the  senate  in  August.      

Lily  Campbell  spoke  in  favour  of  the  motion  noting  that  the  challenging  this  with  fighting  these  changes  is  because  they  are  being  implemented  through  back  door  means  which  makes  it  harder  to  bring  people’s  attention  to  them.      Brandon  Hale  spoke  to  the  motion  but  disagreed  with  platform  2  as  he  does  not  support  free  education.  Moved  to  amend  the  motion  to  remove  platform  2.      The  movers  rejected  the  amendment.      The  amendment  was  put  as  for  foreshadowing  motion.      Lara  Sonnenschein  spoke  to  the  motion  agreeing  with  Lily  Campbell  and  noting  that  it  is  funding  cuts  that  drive  the  need  for  private  partnerships.      Moved:  Harry  Gregg  Seconded:  Will  Edwards      Motion  was  put  and  CARRIED  Manning  noted  his  dissent    As  the  motion  passed  the  foreshadowing  motion  LAPSED.      Q6.  Recognising  the  importance  of  promoting  inclusion  and  access  of  students  and  staff  living  with  a  disability,  that  the  SRC:    1.  Urges  the  university  to  install  disability  access  ramps  and/or  lifts  in  Footbridge  Lecture  Theatre  so  that  staff  and  students  can  reach  the  front  of  the  theatre.      2.  Encourages  the  SRC  Executive  to  advocate  accordingly  in  discussions  with  university  decision  makers.    3.  Encourages  the  SRC  Executive  to  seek  further  feedback  and  advice  from  the  Disability  Officers  and  the  SRC  Disabilities  Collective  on  what  would  be  most  helpful  for  students  and  staff  living  with  a  disability  in  relation  to  accessing  Footbridge  Lecture  Theatre.”    George  Bishop  spoke  to  his  motion  covering  its  main  points  and  highlighting  the  struggles  faced  by  students  with  a  disability  adding  that  this  aimed  to  offer  practical  support  to  those  students.  Adding  that  his  inaccessibility  also  affect  teachers  with  a  disability  who  cannot  access  the  stage  area.  Concluding  that  he  was  not  sure  of  the  best  course  of  action  and  felt  that  the  disability  collective  should  be  consulted  to  find  more  areas  where  there  needs  to  be  changes.      Kim  Murphy  cited  issues  with  the  motion  saying  that  she  is  in  support  of  accessible  learning  spaces  but  that  the  mover  of  the  motion  is  a  member  of  the  liberal  party,  a  party  that  has  removed  millions  from  disability  funding  and  she  find  that  this  motion  is  a  part  of  cynical  behaviour  and  will  

- 21 -

vote  it  down  accordingly.    Adriana  Olguin  Malavisi  spoke  in  favour  of  the  motion  saying  that  it  is  a  motion  of  merit  and  that  a  good  motion  focusing  on  student  issues  shouldn’t  be  rejectd  because  of  the  mover’s  political  affiliation.    James  Newbold  spoke  to  the  motion  saying  that  he  agrees  there  is  something  wrong  with  the  movers  but  not  the  motion  and  as  such  the  motion  should  be  supported  as  it  assists  students.        Moved:  George  Bishop  Seconded:  David  Wan  Motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.      Q7.  Ramsay  Centre    Preamble  The  Ramsay  Centre  for  Western  Civilisation  was  created  in  2017  with  part  of  a  $3  billion  bequest  from  health  care  magnate  Paul  Ramsay.  Sydney  University  Vice-­‐Chancellor  Mike  Spence  has  announced  that  the  university  is  in  negotiations  with  the  Ramsay  Centre  over  the  establishment  of  a  degree  in  “Western  Civilisation.”  Tony  Abbott’s  comments  to  the  right-­‐wing  Quadrant  journal  that  the  degree  isn’t  just  “about  Western  civilisation  but  in  favour  of  it,”  indicates  the  ideological  purpose  of  giving  academic  respectability  to  racist  ideas.  In  the  Quadrant  interview,  Abbott  went  on  to  favourably  compare  Paul  Ramsay  with  Cecil  Rhodes,  the  architect  of  South  African  apartheid.    One  of  the  main  excuses  for  the  Ramsay  Centre  has  been  that  it  is  an  opportunity  to  recoup  some  of  the  funding  that  has  been  cut  to  humanities  subjects  in  recent  years.  In  reality,  it  has  been  the  same  people  who  sit  on  the  Ramsay  board,  like  Tony  Abbott  and  John  Howard,  who  have  systematically  gutted  higher  education  funding  over  the  past  two  decades.  Sydney  University  academics,  in  their  open  letter  against  the  Ramsay  Centre,  note  that  the  classics,  languages,  gender  studies  and  normative  philosophy  have  all  suffered  heavily  under  federal  tertiary  education  cuts.    Beyond  the  immediate  concerns  around  the  racist  content  of  the  proposed  degree,  the  NTEU  has  raised  central  concerns  over  academic  freedom.  Ramsay  Centre  CEO  Simon  Haines  has  said  “We  would  not  be  willing  to  hire  somebody  who  is  coming  in  with  a  long  liturgy  of  what  terrible  damage  Western  Civilisation  had  done  to  the  world.”  Tony  Abbott  implied  that  the  Ramsay  Centre  CEO  and  academic  director  would  wield  considerable  influence  over  staffing  and  curriculum  decisions.  This  is  reason  for  great  concern  over  academic  freedom,  integrity  and  independence.  A  Sydney  Morning  Herald  report  notes  that  the  Ramsay  Centre  intends  to  sit  in  on  classes,  monitor  content,  and  have  the  right  to  veto  curriculum  decisions  by  academics  in  any  future  Western  civilisation  degrees.    Platform  

1.   The  SRC  opposes  the  Ramsay  Centre  having  any  presence  on  Sydney  University  campus.  2.   The  SRC  recognises  the  Ramsay  centre  as  a  right  wing,  racist  organisation  with  the  goal  of  

promoting  European  supremacy.    

- 22 -

3.   The  SRC  recognises  the  serious  threat  the  Ramsay  Centre  poses  to  students  and  staff  -­‐  further  privatising  education  and  restricting  academic  freedom.  

Action  1.   All  SRC  councillors  and  OBs  will  attend  the  rally  against  the  Ramsay  Centre  on  15th  August.  

The  SRC  will  also  share  the  rally  event  from  its  main  Facebook  page.  2.   The  SRC  supports  and  will  be  actively  involved  in  the  EAG  Forum  organised  against  the  

Ramsay  centre  on  August  8.  The  event  will  be  shared  from  the  SRC  Facebook  page.        Jack  Mansell  spoke  to  his  motion  noting  that  there  are  a  number  of  issues  with  the  centre  the  biggest  being  that  it  presents  racism  and  culture  wars  as  having  academic  legitimacy.  Noting  that  if  Western  civilisation  defeated  the  Nazi’s  it’s  worth  noting  that  they  also  created  them.  Adding  that  if  the  Centre  is  allowed  to  have  control  over  what  and  how  academics  teach  then  academic  freedom  is  compromised.  The  NETU  has  raised  this  concern.      Maddie  Clark  spoke  to  the  motion  agreeing  with  Jack  Mansell’s  comments  and  adding  that  this  is  an  opportunity  to  better  engage  students  around  issues  of  their  rights  at  university.      Sophie  ______  spoke  in  favour  of  the  motion  and  said  that  the  centre  should  not  be  able  to  determine  academic  content  as  they  should  not  be  able  to  impede  student’s  right  to  learn.  Suggesting  that  this  be  looked  at  with  the  context  of  the  books  not  bombs  campaign  which  shows  that  one  of  the  biggest  reason  we  have  gone  to  war  has  been  western  civilisation.        Manning  Jeffery  spoke  against  the  motion  speaking  in  favour  of  a  free  market  in  education  and  that  if  someone  doesn’t  like  the  ideological  direction  of  the  Ramsey  Centre  they  shouldn’t  do  its  classes  but  there  should  be  a  choice.      An  amendment  was  proposed  by  Vinil  Kumar  to  end  platform  1  with  an  exclamation  mark    Jack  Mansell  responded  to  the  amendment  saying  that  the  idea  that  the  free  market  can  be  applied  to  education  is  appalling.    The  amendment  was  not  amenable  to  the  movers  and  was  withdrawn.      Moved:  Jack  Mansell  Seconded:  Imogen  Grant  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.  Manning  Jeffery  noted  his  dissent      Q8.  Unite  against  Trump    US  President  Donald  Trump  will  be  visiting  Australia  in  mid-­‐November.  Inspired  by  the  scale  of  the  protests  against  his  UK  visit,  organising  for  a  mass  demonstration  has  begun.  Last  Wednesday  night,  the  Unite  Against  Trump  alliance  was  formed,  comprised  of  a  broad  coalition  of  left-­‐wing  politicians,  activists,  unionists  and  students,  all  outraged  at  Trump’s  vile  racism,  sexism,  homophobia  and  war-­‐mongering.    

- 23 -

 The  first  meeting  was  a  success,  with  80  activists  in  attendance  to  discuss  the  campaign  going  forward  and  a  launch  of  the  alliance’s  Facebook  page.  The  alliance  is  open  and  inclusive  to  all  campaign  groups,  unions  and  community  groups  and  individuals  who  want  to  get  involved,  so  we  can  give  Trump  the  biggest  “welcoming”  he  deserves.    The  University  of  Sydney  SRC  should  join  the  United  Against  Trump  alliance  and  be  active  in  the  campaign.  Trump’s  election  has  emboldened  the  far-­‐right  globally,  including  Australia,  and  the  SRC  should  fight  against  all  forms  of  discrimination.  A  mass  mobilisation  not  only  sends  a  message  to  the  far-­‐right  that  their  bigotry  is  not  tolerated,  but  to  the  Australian  government,  that  their  actions  will  not  be  silently  accepted.  Moreover,  the  SRC  needs  to  stand  in  solidarity  with  persecuted  migrants  the  world  over  against  Trump’s  muslim  ban  and  increased  attacks  on  refugees  -­‐  recognising  that  his  inspiration  for  locking  up  children  comes  from  the  bipartisan  Australian  policy  of  torture.  As  David  Shoebridge,  Greens  MP  said,  this  protest  is  “not  just  no  to  Trump,  it's  yes  to  peace  and  equality  because  these  are  the  values  Australians  will  rally  around.”    Platform    

1.   The  SRC  opposes  Donald  Trump  and  every  thing  he  stands  for  2.   The  SRC  condemns  the  Australian  government  for  facilitating  his  visit  and  calls  for  him  to  

be  denied  entry  to  Australia  3.   The  SRC  supports  holding  a  mass  protest  against  Trump’s  visit  

 Action    

1.   The  SRC  will  join  the  Unite  Against  Trump  alliance  and  will  participate  in  the  protest  against  Trump’s  visit  in  November  

2.   The  SRC  will  give  serious  resources  to  organising,  building  and  promoting  the  future  protest  

 Moved:  Sophie  Haslam  Seconded:  Kim  Murphy  The  motion  was  put  and  CARRIED.  Manning  Jeffery  noted  his  dissent    

 Imogen  Grant  moved  from  the  Chair  that  R1  be  held  over  till  next  meeting  so  Harry  Gregg  could  speak  to  his  report.      The  meeting  closed  at  10:02  pm.        

- 24 -

Budget  2018    Summary Total income $1 826 351.00 Total expenditure $1 826 063.36 Net surplus $287.64 Income SSAF (Student Services Amenities Fee) – allocation from University $1 765 351

Sundry – interest earned from our reserves and term deposits $45 000.00

Membership – fee paid by students running for election $5 000.00

Honi ads $11 000.00 Total $1 826 351.00 Expenditure Representation Collectives and Departments Autonomous Collective Against Racism (ACAR) $2 000

Campus Refugee Action Collective (CRAC) $3 200 Disabilities and Carers Collective $2 450 Education Action Group $20 200 Environment Collective $9 500 Indigenous Collective $1 000 International Students' Collective $1 500 Queer Action Collective $3 700 Wom*n's Collective $3 150 Global Solidarity Department $1 500 Intercampus Department - Sexual Harassment Department - Social Justice Department $1 500 Student Housing Department $400 Welfare Department $1 000 Council Resources Pool $6 000

- 25 -

Subtotal $57 100 Student stipends – President, General Secretaries, Wom*n’s OBs, and Education OBs President Stipend $38,836.80 President Superannuation $3,689.50 General Secretaries’ Stipend $25,891.20 General Secretaries’ Superannuation $2,459.66 Wom*n’s Officers’ Stipend $25,891.20 Wom*n’s Officers’ Superannuation $2,459.66 Education Officers’ Stipend $25,891.20 Education Officers’ Superannuation $2,459.66 Subtotal $127 578.89 National Union of Students (NUS) Affiliation fees $64 300.00 Conference – fees and travel subsidies $18 000.00 Subtotal $82 300.00 Elections Electoral Officer (EO) stipend $10 000 Electoral Officer Budget: Polling Booth Attendants (PBAs) wages, PBAs superannuation, Ballot papers, Miscellaneous expenses

$55 000

Subtotal $65 000 O-Week Stalls $4 335.00 Merchandise $7 165 Handbooks $8 000 Subtotal $19 500 Representation: net expenditure $350 478.89 Publications Honi Soit Editors’ stipends $44 000 Printing and discretionary $52 500 Subtotal $96 500

- 26 -

Publications staff expenses Salaries $92, 619.24 Superannuation $11, 814.08 Distribution salary $7,329.17 Other – training, car-parking, miscellaneous expenses, etc. $11,160

Subtotal $219, 422.49 Publications: net expenditure $212 093.32 Welfare Casework Salaries $447,534.18 Superannuation $58,975.48 Other $8 000 Research Officer $29 189.47 Subtotal $543 699.13

Legal Centre Salaries $134 795.70

Superannuation $17 027.54

Other $13 176.77

Conflict registry and training $5 076

Subtotal $170 076

Welfare: net expenditure $713 775.13

Infrastructure Administration Salaries $340,542.82 Superannuation $43 529.99 Casual cover – 2 weeks $2 758 Other $106 000 Subtotal $492 830.81

Bookshop Salaries $33 606.04

- 27 -

Other $14 950

Subtotal $48 556.04

Infrastructure: net expenditure $541 386.85

Total $ 1 826 063.36