accelerated community infrastructure programme mokgalaka
TRANSCRIPT
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMME
MOKGALAKA MOKGALAKA
Table of content Defination ACIP & Sub-ProgramsAccumulated allocations and expenditureAllocation and expenditure per sub programNotes per sub programChallengesSummary
Defination & Sub ProgrammeACIP-Accelerated Community Infrastructure
Programme
Sub-divided into 3-Community InfrastructureWater Conservation and Demand
ManagementWaste Water Refurbishment
ACCUMULATED ACIP EXPENDITURE
Regions Allocations R’000
Expenditure R’000
Available budget R’000
Exp %
Gauteng 12,550 3,270 9,280 26
Northern Cape 32,108 7,006 25,102 22
Western Cape 13,000 2,354 10,646 18
Eastern Cape 40,256 14,573 25,683 36
North West 25,500 3,362 22,138 13
Free State 33,690 8,034 25,656 24
Kwazulu Natal 25,000 5,618 19,382 22
Mpumalanga 16,500 5,818 10,682 35
Limpopo 31,285 11,295 19,990 36
Operational 1,500 0 1,500 0
Grand total 231,389 61,330 170,059 27
Accumulated allocation & exp
Gauten
g
Northern
Cape
West
ern Cap
e
Easte
rn Cap
e
North W
est
Free S
tate
Kwazulu Nata
l
Mpumalanga
Limpopo
Operational
Grand to
tal
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
Allocations R’000 Expenditure R’000 Available budget R’000 Exp %
COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE:WATER SUPPLY
Regions Allocation R’000
Expenditure R’000
Available budget R’000
%
North West 2,000 0 2,000 0
Free State 3,000 0 3,000 0
Limpopo 9,195 10,262 (1,067) 111
Total 14,195 10,262 3,993 72
Community Infrastructure
Allocation R’000 Expenditure R’000 Available budget R’000 %
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
North West Free State Limpopo Total
WATER CONSERVATION AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT
Regions Allocations R’000
Expenditure R’000
Available budget R’000
Exp %
Gauteng 12,550 2,594 9,956 21
Northern Cape 14,108 2,722 11,386 19
Western Cape 5,000 0 5,000 0
Eastern Cape 15,166 7,003 8,163 46
North West 13,000 763 12,237 6
Free State 11,000 1,815 9,185 17
Mpumalanga 2,500 0 2,500 0
Limpopo 5,280 0 5,280 0
Total 78,604 14,897 63,707 19
Water Conservation
Gauten
g
Northern
Cape
West
ern Cap
e
Easte
rn Cap
e
North W
est
Free S
tate
Mpumalanga
Limpopo
Total
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
Allocations R’000 Expenditure R’000 Available budget R’000 Exp %
WASTE WATER REFURBISHMENT
Regions Allocations R’000
Expenditure R’000
Available budget R’000
Exp %
Kwazulu Natal 25,000 5,597 19,403 22
Northern Cape 18,000 894 17,106 5
Western Cape 8,000 2,163 5,837 27
Eastern Cape 25,090 6,368 18,722 25
North West 10,500 1,227 9,273 12
Free State 19,690 2,388 17,302 12
Mpumalanga 14,000 2,093 11,907 15
Limpopo 16,810 0 16,810 0
Total 137,090 20,730 116,360 15
Waste Water
Kwazulu Na-tal
Northern Cape
Western Cape
Eastern Cape North West Free State Mpumalanga Limpopo Total 0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
Allocations R’000 Expenditure R’000 Available budget R’000 Exp %
Community Infrastructure• The expenditure is this sub-program is good,
of the allocated R14,195 the expenditure is R10,262 which represent 72%
• The concern though is that only Limpopo is spending and they have also exceeding their budget while North West and Free State have not recorded any expenditure to date.
Water Conservation• The expenditure on water conservation is
relatively low, of the allocated R78,604 only R14,897 have to date been spent representing 19%
• Three regions namely Western Cape, Mpumalanga and Limpopo have not yet recorded expenditure to date while North West and Free State have recorded an expenditure of less than 20%
Waste Water• The expenditure in this sub-program is very
low, of the R137,090 allocation only R20,730 to date have been spent representing 15%
• Limpopo have not yet recorded expenditure while Northern Cape have to date spent less than 10% and North West, Free State and Mpumalanga have an expenditure of less than 20% to date
Summary• The expenditure to date is at 27% after 7
months of the financial year • A recovering plan detailed to the latter on how
projects and expenditure will be fast tracked from regions is needed
• Intervention from Head Office is also recommended
ThanksThe report was done on behalf of Her Excellency Honourable Director:Water Services Infrastructure- Her Majesty Ms E.K Boikanyo