anaerobically expressed escherichia coli genesidentified

8
Vol. 173, No. 19 JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, OCt. 1991, p. 6139-6146 0021-9193/91/196139-08$02.00/0 Copyright © 1991, American Society for Microbiology Anaerobically Expressed Escherichia coli Genes Identified by Operon Fusion Techniques MuHYEON CHOE AND WILLIAM S. REZNIKOFF* Department of Biochemistry, 420 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Received 12 February 1991/Accepted 16 July 1991 Genes that are expressed under anaerobic conditions were identified by operon fusion techniques with a hybrid bacteriophage of A and Mu, XplacMuS3, which creates transcriptional fusions to lacZY. Cells were screened for anaerobic expression on XG medium. Nine strains were selected, and the insertion point of the hybrid phage in each strain was mapped on the Escherchia coli chromosome linkage map. The anaerobic and aerobic expression levels of these genes were measured by I-galactosidase assays in different medium conditions and in the presence of three regulatory mutations (fnr, narL, and rpoN). The anaerobically expressed genes (aeg) located at minute 99 (aeg-99) and 75 (aeg-75) appeared to be partially regulated byfnr, and aeg-93 is tightly regulated byfnr. aeg-60 requires a functional rpoN gene for its anaerobic expression. aeg-46.5 is repressed by narL. aeg-65A and aeg-65C are partially controlled byfnr but only in media containing nitrate or fumarate. aeg47.5 and aeg-48.5 were found to be anaerobically induced only in rich media. The effects of a narL mutation on aeg-46.5 expression were observed in all medium conditions regardless of the presence or absence of nitrate. This suggests that narL has a regulatory function in the absence of exogenously added nitrate. Escherichia coli is a facultative bacterium. It can grow aerobically by using oxygen as a terminal electron acceptor or anaerobically either by fermentation or, in the presence of an alternative electron acceptor, by respiration. E. coli has evolved control mechanisms to adapt to these different environments. One manifestation of this regulation was observed in two-dimensional protein gel analysis of the total E. coli proteins. The protein profile showed that the levels of at least 125 proteins were influenced by the choice between aerobic and anaerobic growth conditions (21, 24). Determin- ing the global regulatory mechanisms that control gene expression in response to changes in oxygen availability is a central question in bacterial genetic regulation research. Recent studies have examined the regulation of genes that respond to anaerobic respiratory conditions. The pleiotropic regulatory protein, Fnr, was identified (25). Fnr is a positive and a negative regulator which responds to the availability of oxygen. It is required for the induction of anaerobic respi- ratory enzymes. For example, Fnr positively regulates the expression of nitrate reductase (narGHJI at 27 min) (6, 14), fumarate reductase (frdABCD at 94 min) (12), and dimethyl sulfoxide reductase (dmsABC at 20 min) (9). An example of negative regulation by Fnr is the repression of the aerobic respiratory enzyme NADH dehydrogenase (ndh at 22 min) under anaerobic conditions (26). The genes encoding anaerobic respiration functions are also regulated according to the availability of their substrates and other alternative electron acceptors. For instance, ni- trate reductase is induced by nitrate, but fumarate reductase and dimethyl sulfoxide reductase are repressed by nitrate. The products of the narL and narX genes were found to be required for the anaerobic nitrate induction of nitrate reduc- tase and nitrate-inducible formate dehydrogenase. NarL and NarX were also found to be responsible for the repression of fumarate reductase, dimethyl sulfoxide reductase, and pyru- vate formate-lyase synthesis in response to the presence of nitrate (13, 19, 28, 29). However, some fermentation systems * Corresponding author. show nitrate-mediated regulation independent of narL and narX. The genes of the formate hydrogen lyase pathway, which is necessary for anaerobic fermentative growth of E. coli, are repressed by alternative electron acceptors such as nitrate, fumarate, or trimethylamine-N-oxide. The repres- sion of these genes by nitrate is independent of narL and/or narX (27). The sigma factor 54 (Cr54, encoded by rpoN) for RNA polymerase controls the genes of nitrogen fixation (nif) in Klebsiella pneumoniae (3, 16) and nitrogen metabolism (gln) in E. coli (30). The expression of these genes is programmed by nif-type promoters which have -24 and -12 consensus sequences. a 54 was also found to be responsible for the transcription of some genes that are involved in fermentative growth. The fdhF and hyd-J7 genes of the formate hydrogen lyase system have the nif-type promoter sequence which is recognized by the r54 holoenzyme (3). In an rpoN mutant, these two fermentative genes are not anaerobically ex- pressed. hydB and hydF, which are related to hydrogenase activity, also require CJ54 for their anaerobic expression (17, 18). The functions of these two genes are not yet known. As a general strategy for studying the regulatory mecha- nisms controlling anaerobically expressed genes, we isolated strains that have transcriptional fusions of anaerobically expressed genes to the P-galactosidase structural gene, lacZ. We used a hybrid of bacteriophages lambda and Mu, AplacMu53, which can create transcriptional fusions to the lacZY genes by random insertion in dispensable functions of the E. coli chromosome (7). With this hybrid phage, we could collect a library of anaerobically expressed genes. We could also characterize and categorize the genes by moni- toring the expression of P-galactosidase in different genetic and medium conditions. This procedure grouped the genes according to their regulatory pattern and will help elucidate the overall picture of anaerobic gene expression regulation. Cloning of the gene fused to lacZY was achieved in vivo through aberrant excision of the prophage. This links the flanking chromosomal DNA with the phage DNA. The gene fusion strategy which we used to study genes regulated by anaerobiosis is similar to those described by 6139

Upload: others

Post on 23-Oct-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Anaerobically Expressed Escherichia coli GenesIdentified

Vol. 173, No. 19JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, OCt. 1991, p. 6139-61460021-9193/91/196139-08$02.00/0Copyright © 1991, American Society for Microbiology

Anaerobically Expressed Escherichia coli Genes Identified byOperon Fusion Techniques

MuHYEON CHOE AND WILLIAM S. REZNIKOFF*

Department ofBiochemistry, 420 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Received 12 February 1991/Accepted 16 July 1991

Genes that are expressed under anaerobic conditions were identified by operon fusion techniques with a hybridbacteriophage of A and Mu, XplacMuS3, which creates transcriptional fusions to lacZY. Cells were screened foranaerobic expression on XG medium. Nine strains were selected, and the insertion point of the hybrid phage ineach strain was mapped on the Escherchia coli chromosome linkage map. The anaerobic and aerobic expressionlevels of these genes were measured by I-galactosidase assays in different medium conditions and in the presenceof three regulatory mutations (fnr, narL, and rpoN). The anaerobically expressed genes (aeg) located at minute99 (aeg-99) and 75 (aeg-75) appeared to be partially regulated byfnr, and aeg-93 is tightly regulated byfnr. aeg-60requires a functional rpoN gene for its anaerobic expression. aeg-46.5 is repressed by narL. aeg-65A and aeg-65Care partially controlled byfnr but only in media containing nitrate or fumarate. aeg47.5 and aeg-48.5 were foundto be anaerobically induced only in rich media. The effects of a narL mutation on aeg-46.5 expression wereobserved in all medium conditions regardless of the presence or absence of nitrate. This suggests that narL hasa regulatory function in the absence of exogenously added nitrate.

Escherichia coli is a facultative bacterium. It can growaerobically by using oxygen as a terminal electron acceptoror anaerobically either by fermentation or, in the presence ofan alternative electron acceptor, by respiration. E. coli hasevolved control mechanisms to adapt to these differentenvironments. One manifestation of this regulation wasobserved in two-dimensional protein gel analysis of the totalE. coli proteins. The protein profile showed that the levels ofat least 125 proteins were influenced by the choice betweenaerobic and anaerobic growth conditions (21, 24). Determin-ing the global regulatory mechanisms that control geneexpression in response to changes in oxygen availability is acentral question in bacterial genetic regulation research.Recent studies have examined the regulation of genes that

respond to anaerobic respiratory conditions. The pleiotropicregulatory protein, Fnr, was identified (25). Fnr is a positiveand a negative regulator which responds to the availability ofoxygen. It is required for the induction of anaerobic respi-ratory enzymes. For example, Fnr positively regulates theexpression of nitrate reductase (narGHJI at 27 min) (6, 14),fumarate reductase (frdABCD at 94 min) (12), and dimethylsulfoxide reductase (dmsABC at 20 min) (9). An example ofnegative regulation by Fnr is the repression of the aerobicrespiratory enzyme NADH dehydrogenase (ndh at 22 min)under anaerobic conditions (26).The genes encoding anaerobic respiration functions are

also regulated according to the availability of their substratesand other alternative electron acceptors. For instance, ni-trate reductase is induced by nitrate, but fumarate reductaseand dimethyl sulfoxide reductase are repressed by nitrate.The products of the narL and narX genes were found to berequired for the anaerobic nitrate induction of nitrate reduc-tase and nitrate-inducible formate dehydrogenase. NarL andNarX were also found to be responsible for the repression offumarate reductase, dimethyl sulfoxide reductase, and pyru-vate formate-lyase synthesis in response to the presence ofnitrate (13, 19, 28, 29). However, some fermentation systems

* Corresponding author.

show nitrate-mediated regulation independent of narL andnarX. The genes of the formate hydrogen lyase pathway,which is necessary for anaerobic fermentative growth of E.coli, are repressed by alternative electron acceptors such asnitrate, fumarate, or trimethylamine-N-oxide. The repres-sion of these genes by nitrate is independent of narL and/ornarX (27).The sigma factor 54 (Cr54, encoded by rpoN) for RNA

polymerase controls the genes of nitrogen fixation (nif) inKlebsiella pneumoniae (3, 16) and nitrogen metabolism (gln)in E. coli (30). The expression of these genes is programmedby nif-type promoters which have -24 and -12 consensussequences. a54 was also found to be responsible for thetranscription of some genes that are involved in fermentativegrowth. ThefdhF and hyd-J7 genes of the formate hydrogenlyase system have the nif-type promoter sequence which isrecognized by the r54 holoenzyme (3). In an rpoN mutant,these two fermentative genes are not anaerobically ex-pressed. hydB and hydF, which are related to hydrogenaseactivity, also require CJ54 for their anaerobic expression (17,18). The functions of these two genes are not yet known.As a general strategy for studying the regulatory mecha-

nisms controlling anaerobically expressed genes, we isolatedstrains that have transcriptional fusions of anaerobicallyexpressed genes to the P-galactosidase structural gene, lacZ.We used a hybrid of bacteriophages lambda and Mu,AplacMu53, which can create transcriptional fusions to thelacZY genes by random insertion in dispensable functions ofthe E. coli chromosome (7). With this hybrid phage, wecould collect a library of anaerobically expressed genes. Wecould also characterize and categorize the genes by moni-toring the expression of P-galactosidase in different geneticand medium conditions. This procedure grouped the genesaccording to their regulatory pattern and will help elucidatethe overall picture of anaerobic gene expression regulation.Cloning of the gene fused to lacZY was achieved in vivothrough aberrant excision of the prophage. This links theflanking chromosomal DNA with the phage DNA.The gene fusion strategy which we used to study genes

regulated by anaerobiosis is similar to those described by

6139

Page 2: Anaerobically Expressed Escherichia coli GenesIdentified

6140 CHOE AND REZNIKOFF

Winkelman and Clark (31) and Aliabadi et al. (1) except thatthey used the indirect indicator lactose-MacConkey agarrather than XG (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-,-D-galactopy-ranoside) the direct chromogenic substrate for 3-galactosi-dase. Our fusions are different from those which theyidentified, perhaps reflecting a different level of indicatorsensitivity. Collectively, these and other similar communi-cations demonstrate the power of insertional tagging as anapproach for identifying and analyzing genes which respondto specified environmental stimuli.Nine anaerobically expressed genes were characterized in

detail. The position of each fusion was mapped on the E. colilinkage map, and the effects on lacZ expression offnr, narL,and rpoN mutations were analyzed. The control mode ofeach regulatory system on these anaerobically expressedgenes is discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial and phage strains. All bacterial strains used inthese experiments are derivatives of E. coli K-12 and aredescribed in Table 1. The host strain that was used foroperon fusion mutagenesis was RZ4499, which is a lacZA145deletion derivative of MO. The characterization of the geneassociated with each fusion was done in RZ4500. This strainwas constructed by introducing into MG1655 (2) through P1transduction the lacZA145 deletion mutation from X8302which was linked to a lacI::TnJO marker (22). The TnJO wasremoved by selecting tetracycline-sensitive cells by themethod of Bochner (5). Strain X8302, which carries thelacZA145 deletion, was obtained from Jonathan Beckwith.Hfr strains and TnWO marker mapping kit strains were fromCarol A. Gross (23). RZ8426 (fnr-501), RK5278 (narL215::TnWO), and YMC18 (rpoN: :TnlO) were obtained from CarolA. Gross, Valley Stewart, and Boris Magasanik, respec-tively. The hybrid phage AplacMu53 and helper phageXpMu507 were from Thomas Silhavy.Media and chemicals. LB, M9 minimal, and M63 minimal

media were described previously (15). MLCL medium isM63 minimal medium with 0.03% Casamino Acids and 0.2%lactose. MLCG medium is identical to MLCL except thatlactose is substituted by glucose. The concentration ofantibiotics used was 40 ,g/ml for kanamycin and 15 pug/mlfor tetracycline. 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-,3-D-galactopy-ranoside (XG) in N,N-dimethylformamide was added to givea 40-jxg/ml final concentration in agar medium. Cells werealways grown at 37°C.

Isolation of AplacMu53 insertion strains. Fusion strainswere constructed by infecting RZ4499 with XplacMuS3 andhelper phage XpMu507. Infections were done by the proce-dure of Bremer et al. (7). Infected cells were spread on LBagar containing kanamycin and XG. After 24 h of incubationunder aerobic conditions, blue colonies were picked.

Screening for anaerobically induced strains. The selectedblue colonies were put onto duplicate MLCL agar platescontaining kanamycin and XG in a grid array to test theanaerobic and aerobic expression. One plate was aerobicallyincubated for 12 h, and the other was incubated anaerobi-cally in an anaerobic jar (BBL Microbiology Systems, Bec-ton Dickinson and Co.) for 24 h. Aerobically incubatedplates were kept at 4°C until anaerobically grown cells wereready for comparison. Anaerobic jars were chilled in arefrigerator for 1 h after incubation. The cold plates wereremoved from the jar and treated with chloroform vapor for10 min to stop cell growth. The plates were then incubated at37°C in air to allow the XG blue color to develop by

oxidative dimerization of the indole group. The color devel-opment of these anaerobic plates was checked every 3 h andcompared with the color of aerobically grown cells. Onehundred strains that showed high anaerobic expression ofp-galactosidase were purified and tested again for anaerobicand aerobic lacZ expression on LB, MLCL, and MLCG agarwith XG.

Testing and mapping of fusions. Nine fusions were finallyselected for detailed further study and were moved by P1transduction to RZ4500. This procedure ensured that there isonly one copy of AplacMu53 phage inserted in the chromo-some of the test strain. Anaerobic lacZ expression onLB-XG and MLCL-XG agar was tested again. The operonfusion of XplacMuS3 creates a locked-in type of lysogen. Thenumber of phage that were spontaneously induced wascounted to confirm that the phage insertion was of thelocked-in type. This was done by titering the phage found inthe supernatant of overnight cultures of each strain (22).Mapping of these AplacMu53 insertions onto the E. coli

chromosomal linkage map was done by using Hfr strains anda TnlO marker P1 mapping kit. The procedure followed wasdescribed by Singer et al. (23).

I8-Galactosidase assays. f-Galactosidase assays were per-formed as described by Miller (15), using chloroform and0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate to permeabilize cells. The seedcultures for the inoculation of assay cultures were grownaerobically overnight in M9-glucose medium. Assay medium(4 ml) in a test tube (18 by 150 mm) was inoculated by 1/100dilution with 40 ,ul of seed culture. Each sample culture tubefor anaerobic expression analysis was flushed with a 95%nitrogen-5% carbon dioxide gas mixture for 15 min (totalvolume of gas was more than 1 liter) to remove atmosphericair inside the tube. Anaerobic culture tubes were closed withserum stoppers and incubated on a roller drum. Culturetubes for aerobic expression were shaken on an orbitalshaker at an angle of 60 degrees at 300 rpm. Cultures wereincubated until the cell density reached an optical density at600 nm of 0.2 to 0.7 (requiring four or more generations). Thecultures of cells grown in minimal media had not yetachieved stationary phase since the cell mass increased atleast twofold with further incubation. Cultures of cells grownanaerobically in rich media enter the stationary phase at anoptical density at 600 nm of approximately 0.7. All the assayresults are the average of triplicate samples for each strain.

Characterization of gene regulation. The influence of mu-tations of three anaerobic regulatory genes on the expressionof the operon fusions was tested. The fnr-SO1, narL215::TnJO, and rpoN::TnJO mutations were transferred sepa-rately into each fusion strain by P1 transduction. Anaerobi-cally and aerobically expressed 3-galactosidase activitieswere measured. The media used forfnr and narL mutationalanalysis were M9-glucose, M9-galactose, and M9-glucoseplus 10 mM potassium nitrate or 20 mM sodium fumarate.For the rpoN mutant, LB medium plus 15 mM glutamine wasused.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Isolation and initial characterization of operon fusions. Theinsertion of XplacMu53 phage into chromosomal DNA israndom. If the insertion creates an operon fusion to a geneX, lacZ will be transcribed by the gene X promoter and theresulting colony will be blue on XG-containing agar. About10,000 blue colonies were picked and tested for anaerobicexpression on MLCL-XG agar. A total of 100 strains which

J. BACTERIOL.

Page 3: Anaerobically Expressed Escherichia coli GenesIdentified

ANAEROBICALLY EXPRESSED E. COLI GENES 6141

TABLE 1. E. coli and phage strains used in this study

Strain Genotype Source

E. coliMORZ4499MG1655RZ4500X8302CAG8439YMC18RZ8426RK5278RZ4546.5RZ4546.5FRZ4546.5LRZ4546.5NRZ4547.5RZ4547.5FRZ4547.5LRZ4547.5NRZ4548.5RZ4548.5FRZ4548.5LRZ4548.5NRZ4560RZ4560FRZ4560LRZ4560NRZ4565ARZ4565AFRZ4565ALRZ4565ANRZ4565BRZ4565BFRZ4565BLRZ4565BNRZ4565CRZ4565CFRZ4565CLRZ4565CNRZ4575RZ4575FRZ4575LRZ4575NRZ4593RZ4593FRZ4593LRZ4593NRZ4599RZ4599FRZ4599LRZ4599N

azi-7 relAl rpsL100 spoTI metBIMO lacZA145X- F-X- F- lacZA145F- lacI Z-(oc)A145 YF proC trp SmrMG1655 lacI42::TnJO lacZU118rpoN::TnlOMG1655fnr-SO1 zcj::TnlOnarL215::TnlORZ4500 aeg-46.5::XplacMu53RZ4500 aeg-46.5::XplacMu53 fnr-SO1 zcj: :TnJORZ4500 aeg-46.5::XplacMu53 narL215::TnJORZ4500 aeg46.5::XplacMu53 rpoN::TnlORZ4500 aeg-47.5::XplacMu53RZ4500 aeg-47.5::XplacMu53 fnr-SO1 zcj::TnJORZ4500 aeg-47.5::AplacMu53 narL215: :TnJORZ4500 aeg-47.5::XplacMu53 rpoN::TnIORZ4500 aeg-48.5::XplacMu53RZ4500 aeg-48.5::XplacMu53 fnr-501 zcj::TnlORZ4500 aeg-48.5::XplacMu53 narL25: :TnlORZ4500 aeg-48.5::XplacMu53 rpoN::TnlORZ4500 aeg-60::AplacMu53RZ4500 aeg-60::XplacMu53 fnr-SOI zcj::TnlORZ4500 aeg-60::XplacMu53 narL215::TnlORZ4500 aeg-60::XplacMu53 rpoN::TnlORZ4500 aeg-65A::XplacMu53RZ4500 aeg-65A::XplacMu53 fnr-SOI zcj: :TnlORZ4500 aeg-65A::XplacMu53 narL215::TnlORZ4500 aeg-65A::XplacMu53 rpoN::TnlORZ4500 aeg-65B::XplacMu53RZ4500 aeg-65B::XplacMu53 fnr-SO1 zcj: :TnlORZ4500 aeg-65B::XplacMu53 narL215::TnJORZ4500 aeg-65B::AplacMu53 rpoN::TnlORZ4500 aeg-65C::XplacMu53RZ4500 aeg-65C: :XplacMu53 fnr-SOI zcj::TnlORZ4500 aeg-65C: :XplacMu53 narL215::TnlORZ4500 aeg-65C: :XplacMu53 rpoN::TnlORZ4500 aeg-75::XplacMu53RZ4500 aeg-75::XplacMu53 fnr-SO1 zcj::TnlORZ4500 aeg-75::XplacMu53 narL215::TnlORZ4500 aeg-75::XplacMu53 rpoN::TnlORZ4500 aeg-93::XplacMu53RZ4500 aeg-93::XplacMu53 fnr-SOI zcj::TnlORZ4500 aeg-93::XplacMu53 narL215::TnlORZ4500 aeg-93::XplacMu53 rpoN::TnlORZ4500 aeg-99::XplacMu53RZ4500 aeg-99::XplacMu53 fnr-501 zcj::TnlORZ4500 aeg-99::XplacMu53 narL2J5::TnlORZ4500 aeg-99::AplacMu53 rpoN::TnlO

PhageXplacMu53XpMu5O7

C. GrossThis studyJ. BeckwithC. GrossB. MagasanikC. GrossV. StewartThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis studyThis study

Mu cIts62 ner+ A' 'uvrD' MuS' 'trpAB' 'lacZ+ lacY' lacA'cIts857 Sam7 Mu A+B+

T. SilhavyT. Silhavy

showed high anaerobic expression and low aerobic expres-sion were selected and purified. These strains were testedagain on LB, MLCL, and MLCG plates containing XG.Twenty-two strains which showed the most intense anaero-bic expression compared with their aerobic counterpartswere selected on these plates. The anaerobic expressionlevels of P-galactosidase of these 22 strains were measuredin M9-glucose medium (supplemented with Casamino Acidswhen it was necessary for the anaerobic growth of the cells).Nine strains showing the highest ratio of anaerobic-to-aerobic ,-galactosidase activities were selected for furtherstudy.

,-Galactosidase activities measured in liquid culture assayare displayed in Fig. 1 and 2. These assay results revealedcharacteristic regulatory patterns which were not alwaysobserved on agar plates. A commonly used technique forestimating the level of lacZ expression in cells is to incor-porate the chromogenic substrate XG in agar before colonydevelopment. Although we used this approach to help uschoose our initial isolates, we did not find that the aerobicversus anaerobic expression pattern observed on XG-con-taining agar plates corresponded well with the patternsdisplayed in liquid assays. For instance, one fusion whichappeared promising from the XG-agar tests failed to show

VOL. 173, 1991

Page 4: Anaerobically Expressed Escherichia coli GenesIdentified

aIcGlc+NO3 IGic+Fum

va.wJ J mumw. .i..iJ, .." *X _C _J

3:C C C C

Gic+Na Gkc+FumGlc

I0

_ _*J - b- _j . - _J

C: CC-3 . :C

3'

200

* Uox

E3 uaUnit

100.

0

Strains

d1200

1000 a

800'

* Uox

O3 UanUnit 600-

400

200

_--Jf_ Z Strains

c

_ 6_C. __ * - C-J - ' J

C 6- X _ 6- C a- 3 C 6-

* Uox

E3 Uan

Strains

* Uox

ea Uan

_- _- i _- a _j O.- s- _ O- ' _J- Z _ 39 _ , _- Strainsc. cc- c

- a t

C C C C

f

* Uox

a Uu

Stralns

Unit 100

- - J - * j - j - * _J

C C C C

* Uox

Strains

FIG. 1. Results of ,-galactosidase assays offnr and narL mutants. Average activities of wild-type (wt), fnr, and narL constructs in fourdifferent M9 minimal media are displayed. Aerobic and anaerobic activities are shown next to each other in each case. Average values are

calculated from the results of triplicate samples. P-Galactosidase units are as defined by Miller (15). Ox, aerobic; An, anaerobic. (a) aeg-99is partially controlled by fnr in all medium conditions, and the regulatory response is the same in all medium conditions. Culture time: Ox,5 h; An, 6 h. Fum, fumarate. (b) aeg-75 is also partially controlled by fnr in all media, but the degree of the control is different from one

medium to another. In media supplemented with nitrate,fnr control is strongest. Culture time: Ox, 5.5 h; An, 5.5 h. (c) aeg-93 shows completecontrol byfnr for anaerobic expression. No activity greater than 3 units has been detected for anaerobic cultures of thefnr mutants. This generequires fnr for its anaerobic expression. It also shows derepression by the narL mutation in media supplemented with nitrate. narL mightbe involved in the regulation of this gene. Culture time: Ox, 5.5 h; An, 5.5 h. (d) aeg46.5 is an operon that is strongly repressed by narL in

6142

200 -

Unit

100

0

AnnC

300-

Unit 200

100-

0

200e

Unit 100

b 3W,Glc

r I -i"I

Page 5: Anaerobically Expressed Escherichia coli GenesIdentified

ANAEROBICALLY EXPRESSED E. COLI GENES 6143

differential anaerobic expression in liquid culture (data notshown). Implicit in using XG are some simple assumptions.First, the colonies being compared should grow at approxi-mately the same rate (or a correction factor must be used) sothat the cell density is comparable at the time at which colorintensity is examined. This is not the case in comparingaerobic versus anaerobic growth. Second, the formation ofthe color pigment should be comparable under both growthconditions. This clearly is not the case for XG since oxygenis required for dimerization of the indolyl moieties to give theindigo color. Comparable complications undoubtedly existin other systems; thus, the overreliance on XG may beproblematical.The anaerobic growth of most strains was poor on M9-

glucose, M9-glucose plus fumarate, and M9-galactose agar.This might indicate that there are some secondary metabo-lites produced from fermentation that interfere the anaerobicgrowth of cells on these plates. Almost none of these poorgrowth properties were observed in the fnr or narL mutantderivatives. We do not have clear explanation for theseobservations.

Locating XplacMu inserts on E. coli linkage map. Nineselected lacZY fusions were mapped on the E. coli chromo-somal linkage map by Hfr conjugation and P1 transduction.The results are shown in Fig. 3.

Anaerobically expressed gene 93 (aeg-93) is located at min93 near the genes for fumarate reductase (frd) and fermen-tative formate dehydrogenase (fdhF). aeg-60 is at mini 60close to the hydrogenase (hyd) cluster, the formate hydrogenlyase regulator gene (nIhA), and the anaerobic electrontransport gene (ant). The aerobic respiration control gene(arcA) (11) is close to aeg-99 at min 99. Two genes, aeg-65Aand -65C, are clustered at min 65. Other fusions (aeg46.5,-47.5, 48.5, and -75) were mapped to regions where noknown anaerobically controlled genes are located.For detailed characterization, these nine fusions were

transferred into the RZ4500 strain by P1 transduction.RZ4500 grows very well anaerobically in minimal mediumwithout any additional supplementation. The location ofeach fusion was checked again by testing the linkage withTnJO markers, and anaerobic and aerobic expression wasalso compared on XG-containing agar. The results of thesetests correlated well with that of the originally isolatedstrains. The spontaneous phage induction test gave less thanor close to 100 phage per ml of supernatant. This confirmsthat the inserted phage are all locked-in type (22).fnr regulation. Fnr is a positive regulator for anaerobic

respiratory functions. The role of Fnr in regulating theexpression of the fusion constructs was examined after P1transduction of fnr-501 (a point mutation) into each strainusing the linked marker zcj::TnJO. Transductants were se-lected on tetracycline-containing agar and were tested onM9-glycerol plus nitrate agar for anaerobic growth proper-ties. Those that could not grow on this plate were used forfurther study.The resulting fnr constructs (and the parental strains as

controls) were grown in M9-glucose, M9-glucose plus ni-

trate, M9-glucose plus fumarate, or M9-galactose mediumand examined for P-galactosidase synthesis.As shown in Fig. la, aeg-99 is partially regulated by fnr.

The difference in expression level between wild-type cellsand fnr mutants is almost the same regardless of mediumconditions.The gene associated with aeg-75 shows decreased anaer-

obic expression in the presence of thefnr mutation (Fig. lb).In this case, the decrease in expression is different for eachmedium condition tested. In M9-glucose plus nitrate me-dium, the fnr mutation had the greatest effect on anaerobicexpression.The effect of thefnr mutation on aeg-99 and -75 expression

shows that the anaerobic induction of these two genes ispartially regulated by fnr rather than showing a total aboli-tion of expression as for aeg-93 (Fig. lc). The fnr controlpattern of aeg-99 and -75 does not resemble that of anyknown anaerobic respiratory system genes as the presenceof alternative electron acceptors does not affect their expres-sion. This suggests that aeg-99 and -75 are probably notinvolved in anaerobic respiration with alternative electronacceptors.

aeg-93 is very tightly controlled by fnr, as shown in Fig.lc. With the fnr mutation, anaerobic activity of this gene isless than 3 units in all media. Thefnr mutation decreased theanaerobic expression to levels below that found for aerobicexpression in three media.The fnr mutation has small effects on aeg46.5 except in

M9-glucose plus nitrate medium, in which the anaerobicexpression level decreased fivefold from 52 to 10 units forthe fnr mutant.The aeg-65A and aeg-65C fusions show decreased anaer-

obic expression in the fnr mutant background only when thecells were grown in the presence of an alternative electronacceptor, such as nitrate or fumarate (Fig. le and f). Thispattern is different from that of aeg-75 and aeg-99, for whichthe fnr mutation also exerts its influence when the cells aregrown in media without nitrate or fumarate. aeg-65A andaeg-65C could be involved with anaerobic respiration.narL regulation. The narL product mediates nitrate acti-

vation of the nar and fdn operons and nitrate repression ofthe frd and dms operons. The role of narL in the regulationof aeg fusions was examined by transducing the narL215::TnJO allele into each strain and then examining the level ofP-galactosidase synthesis after growth on M9-glucose me-dium in the presence or absence of nitrate.As indicated in Fig. lc, the Fnr-regulated fusion aeg-93 is

10-fold derepressed in glucose nitrate medium in the pres-ence of a narL mutation. The tightfnr control on aeg-93 andits increased expression in the presence of the narL mutantin M9-glucose plus nitrate medium shows that this gene isdually controlled by fnr and narL, as are the genes ofanaerobic respiratory systems, such as the nar,frd, and dmsgenes. The fumarate reductase system, frdABCD, mapsclose to this gene. But the anaerobic expression level ofaeg-93 in M9-glucose plus fumarate medium was the lowestin all tested media, which suggests that it is not a fusion

all medium conditions. The degree of derepression is highest in media supplemented with nitrate, and the ratio of anaerobic to aerobic activityis 92. In other medium conditions, the narL mutant causes a 30 to 40-fold increase of anaerobic expression. Culture time: Ox, 5.5 h; An, 5.5h. (e) aeg-65A shows fnr gene control of anaerobic expression in the presence of alternative electron acceptors. Introduction of the fnrmutation decreased anaerobic expression to 21 to 40% of wild-type expression. Culture time: Ox, 5.5 h; An, 5.5 h. (f) aeg-65C shows slightcontrol by fnr in media supplemented with an alternative electron acceptor. Culture time: Ox, 6 h; An, 9.5 h.

VOL. 173, 1991

Page 6: Anaerobically Expressed Escherichia coli GenesIdentified

6144 CHOE AND REZNIKOFF

1000-

800

Unit 600

400-

200

* Uox

E3Uan

z z z

~~~00CD~~~~CLCvo . . O. s. r

0

FIG. 2. Results of P-galactosidase assays of rpoN mutants in LBplus 0.015 M glutamine. For aeg-60, the Uan/Uox of the wild type(wt) shows a 52-fold increase in activity by anaerobic conditions,while that of the rpoN mutant shows no increase at all. aeg-60requires rpoN for its anaerobic expression. Results for aeg48.5 and47.5 show that they are not affected by the rpoN mutation but thatthey are anaerobically highly induced when grown in rich medium.Average values are calculated from the results of triplicate samplesfor each case. 1-Galactosidase units are as defined by Miller (15).Ox, aerobic; An, anaerobic.

associated with the function defined by the frd operon. Theother gene that is located close to aeg-93 is the fermentativeformate dehydrogenase gene,fdhF, but it is known thatfdhFis not regulated by fnr. The high activity of the narL mutantin medium with nitrate indicates that this gene is influencedby nitrate utilization and is controlled by the narL regulatoryfunction. It is probable that aeg-93 is involved in an anaer-obic respiration system.A somewhat more unusual effect of the narL mutation was

demonstrated with aeg46.5. This gene was very stronglyderepressed in a narL strain (Fig. ld). The anaerobic-to-aerobic expression ratio of the narL mutant varied from29-fold to 92-fold depending on the growth medium used.This narL effect was most pronounced in M9-glucose plusnitrate medium, in which the anaerobic activity was 1,200units. NarL mediates the activation or the repression bynitrate. Other previously studied narL-regulated genes dem-onstrate narL control only in the presence of nitrate (9, 19,27). The data from aeg46.5 show that the effect of the narLmutation also occurs in the absence of exogenously addednitrate. This derepression by narL in all media suggests thatnarL can function as an anaerobic repressor in the absenceof nitrate. The level of expression of aeg46.5 and aeg-93with narL in nitrate medium was much higher than that ofany other genetic backgrounds and medium conditions.These observations raise the question whether there exists a

condition or a stimulus which will make the expression ofthese two genes in wild-type cells as high as the derepressedlevel manifested by the narL mutant.

All other strains demonstrated no change in anaerobicregulation as a consequence of introducing narL::TnlO.

(W54 holoenzyme regulation. Another regulatory functionwhich was tested is rpoN. The rpoN gene encodes the

rpoN C6A / f n r65Afn

arcB 65B fdnGHI650Cdn

60 47.5

48.5 46.5

h/fhydABEFfhIA, fdvant

FIG. 3. Results of Hfr and P1 transduction mapping analysis ofoperon fusions. The positions of XplacMu53 fusions which aresubject to anaerobic induction are displayed. The possible place-ment error is estimated to be + 1 min after P1 transduction mapping.

alternative sigma factor 54 of RNA polymerase, which isresponsible for the transcription of the genes of nitrogenmetabolism and some genes related to fermentative growth.Therefore, our fusions were examined for their expression inan rpoN background. The relevant strains were constructedby P1 transduction of an rpoN: :TnJO allele and were assayedfor ,B-galactosidase synthesis after growth in LB mediumwith 0.015 M of glutamine supplementation. Glutamine wasadded because the introduction of the rpoN mutation madethe cells grow poorly in LB medium without glutaminesupplementation.The results are presented in Fig. 2. An effect of the rpoN

mutation was observed only for aeg-60. The results for theother two gene fusions are presented for comparison and toshow the anaerobic expression of these genes in complexmedium. The anaerobic expression of aeg-60 is reducedfrom 172 to 2 units by a TnJO insertion mutation in the rpoNgene.Hydrogenase cluster and aeg-60. Some genes known to be

controlled by rpoN are located close to where aeg-60 ismapped. hydB and hydF, which are among the hydrogenasecluster at min 59, are transcribed by the or"' holoenzyme.The hydB and hydF genes are expressed anaerobically, andtheir expression is constitutive. However, under certaingrowth conditions, hydF expression does require the Fnrprotein. The biological functions of hydB and hydF are notknown (21a). The expression of aeg-60 shows high activity ata late phase of growth in the media containing nitrate orfumarate. This late induction of aeg-60 by fumarate andnitrate excludes the possibility of aeg-60 being hydB orhydF.Another gene that is at min 59 and is transcribed by the CrS4

holoenzyme is hyd-J7, which encodes the hydrogenase ofthe formate hydrogen lyase system. hyd-17 is required forhydrogen evolution during fermentative growth and is in-duced by formate, which is the substrate of this enzyme.This gene is known to be repressed by the presence of nitrateor fumarate and is not regulated directly by fnr. However,the induction of hyd-17 is indirectly reduced by the influenceof an fnr mutation (4, 8) because its inducer, formate, is

--U6Ag

J. BACTERIOL.

Page 7: Anaerobically Expressed Escherichia coli GenesIdentified

ANAEROBICALLY EXPRESSED E. COLI GENES 6145

TABLE 2. Summary of ,-galactosidase assay analysis

Gene of Position Apparent regulatoryfusion (min) control

aeg-75 75 Partial activation by fnraeg-99 99 Partial activation by fnraeg-93 93 Tight regulation by fnr; repression by narL

in NO3 mediaaeg-60 60 Requires rpoNaeg46.5 46.5 Repression by narLaeg-65A 65 Partial activation by fnr in NO3 and

fumarate mediaaeg-65C 65 Same as aeg-6SAaeg-47.5 47.5 Anaerobically induced only in rich mediumaeg48.5 48.5 Same as aeg-47.5

produced by pyruvate formate-lyase (pfl) and pfl needs thefunction of the fnr gene for its expression (20). The intro-duction of the fnr mutation did not reduce the expression ofaeg-60 to the extent that is expected for hyd-1 7. I-Galactosi-dase assay results obtained in minimal media showed thatanaerobic expression with the fnr mutation was slightlyreduced only in M9-glucose medium and was not reduced inM9-galactose medium at 6 h of incubation (data not shown).High anaerobic expression in rich medium. Fusions of

aeg47.5 and aeg48.5 fall into a unique class. As shown inFig. 2, these fusions manifest at least a ninefold response toanaerobiosis when grown in rich media. However, they arenot anaerobically induced when grown in minimal media(data not shown) nor is their expression affected by Fnr,NarL, or RpoN.We measured anaerobic P-galactosidase synthesis in M9-

glucose supplemented with 14 amino acids (autoclavable 14amino acid [10]) in the RZ4499 strain background, but therewas no anaerobic induction of aeg47.5 and aeg48.5 (datanot shown). We do not know yet which component of richmedium is responsible for their anaerobic expression.As these two genes show anaerobic expression only in rich

medium, we cannot exclude the possibility that the high levelof anaerobic expression in rich media for these two strains isdependent on cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein-cAMPcomplex (CRP-cAMP). However, 3-galactosidase assays ofcultures grown in galactose medium (where CRP-cAMPshould be present) compared with those from cultures grownin glucose medium show no increase under aerobic condi-tions and less than a threefold increase under anaerobicconditions (data not shown). This suggests that, at least foraerobically grown cells, CRP-cAMP does not stimulate theexpression of these genes.The anaerobic expression of aeg-60, aeg47.5, and aeg-

48.5 was observed in ,3-galactosidase assays done in richmedium. The cell densities of the cultures used for the assayall had an optical density at 600 nm of 0.2 to 0.7. Since theoptical density at 600 nm of this strain is approximately 0.7when the cells reach the stationary phase after anaerobicgrowth in rich medium, it is possible that these genes arestationary-phase-induced genes.The characteristics of the genes associated with each

fusion are summarized in Table 2.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Public Health Service grantGM19670 from the National Institutes of Health and grant CRCR-1-1747 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

REFERENCES1. Aliabadi, Z., F. Warren, S. Mya, and J. W. Foster. 1986.

Oxygen-regulated stimulons of Salmonella typhimurium identi-fied by Mu d(Ap lac) operon fusions. J. Bacteriol. 165:780-786.

2. Bachmann, B. J. 1987. Derivations and genotypes of somemutant derivatives of Escherichia coli K-12, p. 1190-1219. InF. C. Neidhardt, J. L. Ingraham, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, M.Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli andSalmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology. Amer-ican Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.

3. Birkmann, A., R. G. Sawers, and A. Bock. 1987. Involvement ofthe ntrA gene product in the anaerobic metabolism of Esche-richia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 210:535-542.

4. Birkmann, A., F. Zinoni, G. Sawers, and A. Bock. 1987. Factorsaffecting transcriptional regulation of the formate-hydrogen-lyase pathway of Escherichia coli. Arch. Microbiol. 148:44-51.

5. Bochner, B., H. Huang, G. Schieven, and B. N. Ames. 1980.Positive selections for loss of tetracycline resistance. J. Bacte-riol. 143:926-933.

6. Bonnefoy, V., M. Fons, J. Ratouchniak, M. C. Pascal, and M.Chippaux. 1988. Aerobic expression of the nar operon ofEscherichia coli in a fnr mutant. Mol. Microbiol. 2:419-425.

7. Bremer, E., T. J. Silhavy, and G. M. Weinstock. 1985. Trans-posable lambda placMu bacteriophages for creating lacZ operonfusions and kanamycin resistance insertions in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol. 162:1092-1099.

8. Cole, J. A. 1988. Reassessment of the role of the Fnr transcrip-tional activator protein in the expression of formate hydrogen-lyase activity of Escherichia coli K-12. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.55:169-174.

9. Cotter, P. A., and R. P. Gunsalus. 1989. Oxygen, nitrate, andmolybdenum regulation of dmsABC gene expression in Esche-richia coli. J. Bacteriol. 171:3817-3823.

10. Davis, R. W., D. Botstein, and J. R. Roth. 1980. Advancedbacterial genetics, p. 206. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, ColdSpring Harbor, N.Y.

11. Luchi, S., and E. C. Lin. 1988. arcA (dye), a global regulatorygene in Escherichia coli mediating repression of enzymes inaerobic pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:1888-1892.

12. Jones, H. M., and R. P. Gunsalus. 1987. Regulation of Esche-richia coli fumarate reductase (frdABCJJ) operon expression byrespiratory electron acceptors and the fnr gene product. J.Bacteriol. 169:3340-3349.

13. Kalman, L. V., and R. P. Gunsalus. 1990. Nitrate- and molyb-denum-independent signal transduction mutations in narX thatalter regulation of anaerobic respiratory genes in Escherichiacoli. J. Bacteriol. 172:7049-7056.

14. Li, S. F., and J. A. DeMoss. 1988. Location of sequences in thenar promoter of Escherichia coli required for regulation by Fnrand NarL. J. Biol. Chem. 263:13700-13705.

15. Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. p. 351,431. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.

16. Morett, E., and M. Buck. 1989. In vivo studies on the interactionof RNA polymerase-sigma 54 with the Klebsiella pneumoniaeand Rhizobium meliloti nifH promoters. The role of NifA in theformation of an open promoter complex. J. Mol. Biol. 210:65-77.

17. Sankar, P., and K. T. Shanmugam. 1988. Biochemical andgenetic analysis of hydrogen metabolism in Escherichia coli: thehydB gene. J. Bacteriol. 170:5433-5439.

18. Sankar, P., and K. T. Shanmugam. 1988. Hydrogen metabolismin Escherichia coli: biochemical and genetic evidence for a hydFgene. J. Bacteriol. 170:5446-5451.

19. Sawers, G., and A. Bock. 1988. Anaerobic regulation of pyru-vate formate-lyase from Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol.170:5330-5336.

20. Sawers, G., and A. Bock. 1989. Novel transcriptional control ofthe pyruvate formate-lyase gene: upstream regulatory se-quences and multiple promoters regulate anaerobic expression.J. Bacteriol. 171:2485-2498.

21. Sawers, R. G., E. Zehelein, and A. Bock. 1988. Two-dimensionalgel electrophoretic analysis of Escherichia coli proteins: influ-ence of various anaerobic growth conditions and the fnr gene

VOL. 173, 1991

Page 8: Anaerobically Expressed Escherichia coli GenesIdentified

6146 CHOE AND REZNIKOFF

product on cellular protein composition. Arch. Microbiol. 149:240-244.

21a.Shanmugam, K. T. Personal communication.22. Silhavy, T. J., M. L. Berman, and L. W. Enquist. 1984.

Experiments with gene fusions, p. 111. Cold Spring HarborLaboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.

23. Singer, M., T. A. Baker, G. Schnitzler, S. M. Deischel, M. Goel,W. Dove, K. J. Jaacks, A. D. Grossman, J. W. Erickson, andC. A. Gross. 1989. A collection of strains containing geneticallylinked alternating antibiotic resistance elements for geneticmapping of Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev. 53:1-24.

24. Smith, M. W., and F. C. Neidhardt. 1983. Proteins induced byanaerobiosis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 154:336-343.

25. Spiro, S., and J. R. Guest. 1987. Regulation and over-expressionof the fnr gene of Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol. 133:3279-3288.

26. Spiro, S., R. E. Roberts, and J. R. Guest. 1989. FNR-dependentrepression of the ndh gene of Escherichia coli and metal ion

requirement for FNR-regulated gene expression. Mol. Micro-biol. 3:601-608.

27. Stewart, V., and B. L. Berg. 1988. Influence of nar (nitratereductase) genes on nitrate inhibition of formate-hydrogen lyaseand fumarate reductase gene expression in Escherichia coliK-12. J. Bacteriol. 170:4437-4444.

28. Stewart, V., and J. J. Parales. 1988. Identification and expres-sion of genes narL and narX of the nar (nitrate reductase) locusin Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 170:1589-1597.

29. Stewart, V., J. J. Parales, and S. M. Merkel. 1989. Structure ofgenes narL and narX of the nar (nitrate reductase) locus inEscherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 171:2229-2234.

30. Thomas, P. H., and B. Magasanik. 1985. Transcription of gInAby purified Escherichia coli components: core RNA polymeraseand the products of glnF, glnG, and GlnL. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA 82:8453-8457.

31. Winkelman, J. W., and D. P. Clark. 1986. Anaerobically in-duced genes of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 167:362-367.

J. BACTERIOL.