back to the future anirban basu, chief economist, abc october 27, 2010
Post on 21-Dec-2015
223 views
TRANSCRIPT
Back to the Future
Anirban Basu, Chief Economist, ABC
October 27, 2010
Trading Places
15-Year & 30-Year Fixed Mortgage Rates January 1995 through September 2010
Source: Freddie Mac
Jan-95Jan-96
Jan-97Jan-98
Jan-99Jan-00
Jan-01Jan-02
Jan-03Jan-04
Jan-05Jan-06
Jan-07Jan-08
Jan-09Jan-10
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
15-yr
30-yr
Ra
te
U.S. New Home SalesJanuary 1999 through August 2010
Source: Economy.com, Census Bureau
Jan-99Jul-99
Jan-00Jul-00
Jan-01Jul-01
Jan-02Jul-02
Jan-03Jul-03
Jan-04Jul-04
Jan-05Jul-05
Jan-06Jul-06
Jan-07Jul-07
Jan-08Jul-08
Jan-09Jul-09
Jan-10Jul-10
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
Th
ou
sa
nd
s, S
AA
R
U.S. Housing StartsJanuary 1999 through September 2010
Source: Economy.com
Jan
-99
Au
g-9
9
Ma
r-0
0
Oct
-00
Ma
y-0
1
De
c-0
1
Jul-0
2
Fe
b-0
3
Se
p-0
3
Ap
r-0
4
No
v-0
4
Jun
-05
Jan
-06
Au
g-0
6
Ma
r-0
7
Oct
-07
Ma
y-0
8
De
c-0
8
Jul-0
9
Fe
b-1
0
Se
p-1
0
200
700
1,200
1,700
2,200
2,700
Tho
usan
ds,
SA
AR
Mortgage Banker’s Association Mortgage ApplicationsPurchase Index
January 2006 – September 17, 2010
Source: Economy.com
Jan-
06
Mar
-06
May
-06
Jul-0
6
Sep-0
6
Nov-0
6
Jan-
07
Mar
-07
May
-07
Jul-0
7
Sep-0
7
Nov-0
7
Jan-
08
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-0
8
Sep-0
8
Nov-0
8
Jan-
09
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-0
9
Sep-0
9
Nov-0
9
Jan-
10
Mar
-10
May
-10
Jul-1
0
Sep-1
0150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Source: Federal Reserve Board
Commercial Real Estate LoansJanuary 2001 through September 2010
Jan-
01
Jun-
01
Nov-0
1
Apr-0
2
Sep-0
2
Feb-0
3
Jul-0
3
Dec-0
3
May
-04
Oct-0
4
Mar
-05
Aug-0
5
Jan-
06
Jun-
06
Nov-0
6
Apr-0
7
Sep-0
7
Feb-0
8
Jul-0
8
Dec-0
8
May
-09
Oct-0
9
Mar
-10
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Year
to Y
ear %
Cha
nge
Source: The American Institute of Architects
Architecture Billings IndexDecember 2007 through September 2010
Dec-07
Feb-08
Apr-08
Jun-0
8
Aug-08
Oct
-08
Dec-08
Feb-09
Apr-09
Jun-0
9
Aug-09
Oct
-09
Dec-09
Feb-10
Apr-10
Jun-1
0
Aug-10
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
55.4
50.7
41.7
39.7
45.5
43.4
46.146.8
47.6
41.4
36.2
34.734.1
33.3
35.3
43.742.842.9
37.7
43.1
41.7
43.1
46.1
42.843.4
42.5
44.846.1
48.4
45.846.0
47.948.2
50.4
Source: ABC
ABC’s National Backlog AverageNovember 2008 through July 2010
Nov-08
Dec-08
Jan-0
9
Feb-09
Mar-0
9
Apr-09
May-
09
Jun-0
9
Jul-0
9
Aug-09
Sep-09
Oct
-09
Nov-09
Dec-09
Jan-1
0
Feb-10
Mar-1
0
Apr-10
May-
10
Jun-1
0
Jul-1
05
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
7.1
6.76.6
6.3
6.7
6.26.3
5.7
6.1
5.7
5.9
5.6
5.8
6.0
5.5
6.2
6.5
7.4
7.17.0
7.3
Mo
nth
s o
f B
ackl
og
July 09 - July 10: +19.7%
Nonresidential Construction Put-in-PlaceJune 2006 through August 2010
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Jun-
06
Aug-0
6
Oct-06
Dec-0
6
Feb-0
7
Apr-0
7
Jun-
07
Aug-0
7
Oct-07
Dec-0
7
Feb-0
8
Apr-0
8
Jun-
08
Aug-0
8
Oct-08
Dec-0
8
Feb-0
9
Apr-0
9
Jun-
09
Aug-0
9
Oct-09
Dec-0
9
Feb-1
0
Apr-1
0
Jun-
10
Aug-1
0500
550
600
650
700
750
SAA
R ($
billi
ons)
Oct. 2008: $719.0 billionAug. 2010: $562.7 billion
-21.7%
National Nonresidential Construction Spending by Subsector August 2010 v. August 2009
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Lodging
Manufacturing
Office
Commercial
Religious
Educational
Power
Health care
Communication
Public safety
Transportation
Amusement and recreation
Highway and street
Water supply
Sewage and waste disposal
Conservation and development
-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20
-52.0
-35.4
-31.4-21.3
-16.2
-14.4
-11.7
-9.9
-8.3
-7.8
-4.7
-3.7
1.1
7.4
18.1
18.3
12-month %Change
National Nonresidential Construction Spending by Subsector 2007 through 2010
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000 Manufacturing
Conservation and development
Water supply
Sewage and waste disposal
Highway and street
Power
Communication
Transportation
Amusement and recreation
Public safety
Religious
Educational
Health care
Commercial
Office
Lodging
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Sp
end
ing
($m
illi
on
s)
2007 2010F20092008
-14.7%
-7.8%
+8.9%
+19.1%
Inputs to Construction PPIJanuary 2001- September 2010
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Jan-
01
Jun-
01
Nov-0
1
Apr-0
2
Sep-0
2
Feb-0
3
Jul-0
3
Dec-0
3
May
-04
Oct
-04
Mar
-05
Aug-0
5
Jan-
06
Jun-
06
Nov-0
6
Apr-0
7
Sep-0
7
Feb-0
8
Jul-0
8
Dec-0
8
May
-09
Oct
-09
Mar
-10
Aug-1
0-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
12
-mo
nth
% C
ha
ng
e
Key Commodity PricesJanuary 2001- September 2010
Source: BLS: EIA
-40-30-20-10
01020304050 Iron & Steel PPI
12-m
on
th %
Ch
ang
e
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40 Softwood Lumber PPI
12-m
on
th %
Ch
ang
e
-4-202468
1012 Concrete Products PPI
12-m
on
th %
Ch
ang
e
Jan
-01
Jul-
01
Jan
-02
Jul-
02
Jan
-03
Jul-
03
Jan
-04
Jul-
04
Jan
-05
Jul-
05
Jan
-06
Jul-
06
Jan
-07
Jul-
07
Jan
-08
Jul-
08
Jan
-09
Jul-
09
Jan
-10
Jul-
10
$10$25$40$55$70$85
$100$115$130$145 NYMEX Crude Oil
Do
llar
s p
er B
arre
l
Baltimore-Towson MSA Annual Nonresidential Construction Value
2005-2014*
Source: McGraw Hill
2008Q3: -0.5%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
*Forecast: July 2010 through 2014
Baltimore Market View3rd Quarter 2010
Source: CB Richard Ellis
2008Q3: -0.5%Indicator Office IndustrialRetail
(2nd Quarter)
Inventory (SF) 63,247,311 152,037,196 68,825,300
Overall Vacancy Rate (%) 17.5% 12.7% 6.8%
Quarter Net Absorption (SF)
30,633 NA 114,760
YTD Net Absorption (SF) 65,978 -140,264 466,097
Under Construction (SF)
1,110,641 (8 buildings out of
15 in Harford County)
409,024 144,842
Avg. Asking Dir. Lease Rate ($/SF/YR)
$22.33 $4.40 $22.03
Ferris Bueller’s Day Off
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Net Change in U.S. Jobs, BLSJanuary 2001 through September 2010
Jan
-01
Ma
y-01
Se
p-0
1
Jan
-02
Ma
y-02
Se
p-0
2
Jan
-03
Ma
y-03
Se
p-0
3
Jan
-04
Ma
y-04
Se
p-0
4
Jan
-05
Ma
y-05
Se
p-0
5
Jan
-06
Ma
y-06
Se
p-0
6
Jan
-07
Ma
y-07
Se
p-0
7
Jan
-08
Ma
y-08
Se
p-0
8
Jan
-09
Ma
y-09
Se
p-0
9
Jan
-10
Ma
y-10
Se
p-1
0
-900
-700
-500
-300
-100
100
300
500
Th
ou
san
ds
9/10: -95k
Between September 2009 and September 2010, the nation gained 344 thousand jobs.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
National Nonfarm Employmentby Industry Sector GroupsDecember 2007 v. September 2010
Manufacturing
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities
Construction
Professional and Business Services
Financial Activities
Leisure & Hospitality
Information
Other Services
Government
Mining and Logging
Education & Healthcare
-3500 -2500 -1500 -500 500 1500
-2056, -15.0%
-1924, -7.2%
-1887, -25.2%
-1317, -7.3%
-650, -7.9%
-366, -2.7%
-312, -10.3%
-150, -2.7%
-146, -0.7%
+6, +0.8%
+1052, +5.7%Chart Title
Thousands, SA
All told 7,750K Jobs Lost
Source: Wells Fargo
• U.S. Unemployment Rate: June 10’ =9.5%
Jobs Seekers Ratio by Industry2001 Recovery vs. 2009 Recovery
Construction
Manufacturing
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities
Professional And Business Services
Education and Health Services
Leisure and Hospitality
0 5 10 15 20 25
20.1
6.8
5.2
2.7
2.7
4.5
10.9
5.4
3.2
1.9
0.8
2.4
2001 Recovery2009 Recovery
Ratio: Unemployed/ Job Openings
Source: Wells Fargo
• U.S. Unemployment Rate: June 10’ =9.5%
Peak Unemployment Rate by Industry 2001 Recession vs. 2007 Recession
Construction
Manufacturing
Wholesale & Retail Trade
Transportation and Utlities
Leisure & Hospitality
Education and Health Services
Professional And Business Services
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
27.1%
13.0%
10.5%
11.3%
14.2%
6.7%
12.4%
14.0%
7.4%
6.9%
6.6%
10.0%
4.4%
9.1%
2001 Recession2007 Recession
Unemployment Rate (NSA)
National Construction Employment Monthly Net Change
February 2000 - September 2010
Source: Bureau of Labor StatisticsFeb
-00
Aug-0
0
Feb-0
1
Aug-0
1
Feb-0
2
Aug-0
2
Feb-0
3
Aug-0
3
Feb-0
4
Aug-0
4
Feb-0
5
Aug-0
5
Feb-0
6
Aug-0
6
Feb-0
7
Aug-0
7
Feb-0
8
Aug-0
8
Feb-0
9
Aug-0
9
Feb-1
0
Aug-1
0-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
Mo
nth
ly N
et
Ch
an
ge
(th
ou
sa
nd
s)
Maryland Nonfarm Employmentby Industry Sector Groups (NSA)
September 2009 v. September 2010Absolute Change
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities
Financial Activities
Manufacturing
Other Services
Information
Construction, Mining and Logging
Educational & Health Services
Government
Leisure & Hospitality
Professional & Business Services
-10,000 -5,000 0 5,000 10,000 15,000
-6,100
-6,100
-4,900
-4,400
-200
2,000
8,300
9,100
12,900
13,000Chart Title
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
MD Total: +23.6K; +0.9%
US Total: +344K; +0.3%
Baltimore-Towson MSA Nonfarm Employmentby Industry Sector Groups (NSA)
September 2009 v. September 2010Absolute Change
Construction, Mining and Logging
Other Services
Financial Activities
Manufacturing
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities
Information
Government
Professional & Business Services
Educational & Health Services
Leisure & Hospitality
-16,000 -11,000 -6,000 -1,000 4,000 9,000 14,000
-5,700
-3,200
-2,900
-2,800
-1,200
-300
5,000
5,600
7,000
11,500Chart Title
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Baltimore Total: +12.8K; +1.0%
MD Total: +23.6K; +0.9%
US Total: +344K; +0.3%
Baltimore-Towson MSA Construction EmploymentJanuary 2000 through September 2010
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Jan-
00
Jul-0
0
Jan-
01
Jul-0
1
Jan-
02
Jul-0
2
Jan-
03
Jul-0
3
Jan-
04
Jul-0
4
Jan-
05
Jul-0
5
Jan-
06
Jul-0
6
Jan-
07
Jul-0
7
Jan-
08
Jul-0
8
Jan-
09
Jul-0
9
Jan-
10
Jul-1
0-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
12
-mo
nth
ne
t c
ha
ng
e (
00
0’s
)
Washington, DC MSA Nonfarm Employmentby Industry Sector Groups (NSA)September 2009 v. September 2010
Absolute Change
Financial Activities
Information
Manufacturing
Other Services
Construction, Mining and Logging
Educational & Health Services
Trade, Transportation & Utilities
Leisure & Hospitality
Professional & Business Services
Government
-10,000 -5,000 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000
-4,100
-3,500
-2,800
-1,300
-1,100
9,000
9,600
12,700
15,900
21,700Chart Title
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
DC MSA Total: +59.8K; +2.0%
US Total: +344K; +0.3%
Unemployment Rates, Largest 20 Metros(NSA)August 2010
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Rank MSA UR Rank MSA UR
1Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 6.2 11 Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI 9.8
2Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 7.0 12 St. Louis, MO-IL 9.9
3 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 7.6 13Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 10.4
4 Baltimore-Towson, MD 8.2 14San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 10.6
5 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 8.4 14San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 10.6
6 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 8.5 16Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 12.1
7 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 8.7 17Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 12.6
8New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 8.8 18
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 12.8
9 Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ 9.1 19 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 14.4
10Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 9.4 20
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 14.8
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
• U.S. Unemployment Rate: June 10’ =9.5%
Unemployment Rates, U.S. States (SA) September 2010
Rank State Rate Rank State Rate Rank State Rate
1 NORTH DAKOTA 3.7 18 ALASKA 7.8 34 TENNESSEE 9.4
2 SOUTH DAKOTA 4.4 18 LOUISIANA 7.8 36 NORTH CAROLINA 9.6
3 NEBRASKA 4.6 18 WISCONSIN 7.8 37 ARIZONA 9.7
4 NEW HAMPSHIRE 5.5 21 TEXAS 8.1 38DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 9.8
5 VERMONT 5.8 22 COLORADO 8.2 38 MISSISSIPPI 9.8
6 HAWAII 6.3 22 NEW MEXICO 8.2 40 ILLINOIS 9.9
7 KANSAS 6.6 24 NEW YORK 8.3 41 GEORGIA 10.0
8 IOWA 6.8 25 DELAWARE 8.4 41 OHIO 10.0
8 VIRGINIA 6.8 25 MASSACHUSETTS 8.4 43 INDIANA 10.1
8 WYOMING 6.8 27 ALABAMA 8.9 43 KENTUCKY 10.1
11 OKLAHOMA 6.9 28 IDAHO 9.0 45 OREGON 10.6
12 MINNESOTA 7.0 28 PENNSYLVANIA 9.0 46 SOUTH CAROLINA 11.0
13 MONTANA 7.4 28 WASHINGTON 9.0 47 RHODE ISLAND 11.5
14 MARYLAND 7.5 31 CONNECTICUT 9.1 48 FLORIDA 11.9
14 UTAH 7.5 32 WEST VIRGINIA 9.2 49 CALIFORNIA 12.4
16 ARKANSAS 7.7 33 MISSOURI 9.3 50 MICHIGAN 13.0
16 MAINE 7.7 34 NEW JERSEY 9.4 51 NEVADA 14.4
Recent and Potential Stimulus Measures
• August: $26 billion to aid state payrolls with $10 billion for education and about $16 billion for Medicaid.
• September: Small Business Jobs Act: would create a $30 billion lending fund to help with spending and hiring, and provide $12 billion in tax cuts.
• September: Proposed House bill, Housing Opportunity and Mortgage Equity Act would enable many homeowners to cut their monthly mortgage payments by refinancing at lower mortgage rates or for longer fixed terms or both.
• September: QE2 Possibility: The Federal Reserve is considering new tactics for the purchase of long-term U.S. Treasury securities.• This in addition to the March 2009 measure by the Fed to buy $1.7 trillion worth
of Treasury and mortgage-backed securities over a six to nine month period.
Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Rank State % Rank State % Rank State %
1 Nevada 56.6% 18 Pennsylvania 16.3% 35 Montana 9.3%
2 New Jersey 37.4% 19 Utah 15.6% 36 California 9.1%
3 Illinois 36.1% 20 New York 15.5% 36 Kansas 9.1%
4 Arizona 35.3% 21 Maryland 15.0% 38 Kentucky 9.1%
5 Maine 32.1% 22 Mississippi 14.6% 39 South Dakota 9.0%
6 Vermont 31.1% 23 Washington 13.9% 40 Michigan 8.8%
7 North Carolina 30.5% 24 Rhode Island 13.2% 41 Massachusetts 8.5%
8 Connecticut 29.2% 25 Hawaii 12.9% 42 Alabama 8.2%
9 Oregon 29.0% 26 Texas 12.8% 42 Virginia 8.2%
10 Minnesota 26.4% 27 Oklahoma 12.4% 44 Wyoming 8.0%
11 Wisconsin 25.3% 28 Delaware 11.7% 45 New Mexico 6.0%
12 Georgia 24.3% 29 Ohio 11.6% 46 West Virginia 3.5%
13 New Hampshire 23.4% 30 Louisiana 11.1% 47 Idaho 3.3%
14 South Carolina 22.6% 31 Tennessee 10.0% 48 District of Columbia 1.7%
15 Florida 22.2% 32 Indiana 9.9%
16 Colorado 21.2% 33 Nebraska 9.7%
17 Iowa 18.6% 34 Missouri 9.3%
Projected State Budget Shortfalls for FY 2011As Percentage of FY 2010 Budget
• Alaska, Arkansas, and North Dakota are not anticipated to experience short falls in FY 2011.• Combined gaps of $260 billion for 2011 and 2012. The numbers suggest that when all is said
and done, states will have to deal with total budget shortfalls of some $260 billion for 2011 and 2012 combined.
Election WatchNational Overview: The Cook Political Report
Source: The Cook Political Report
2008Q3: -0.5%House of Representatives Races
Senate Races
Governor Races
• House: Republic net gain of at least 40 seats.• Turnover of 39 seats would tip majority to Republicans.
• Senate: Republican net gain of 7 to 9 seats.• Currently there are 57 D’s, 2 I’s, and 41 R’s.
• Governor: Republican net gain of 6 to 8 seats.• Currently there are 26 D’s and 24 R’s
Return to Oz
• Stimulus, stimulus, stimulus;
• This was the worst of it from a broader economic perspective;
• Recovery for office, retail and other construction components being stimulated indirectly is probably at least two years away (probably more);
• Unemployment will peak between 10.0 and 10.7 percent next year;
• Commodity prices beginning to surge;
• Too soon to tell if broader inflation will be problematic – deflation could be the bigger issue;
&• 2011????