bern scanning laboratory
DESCRIPTION
Bern Scanning Laboratory. Hunting muonless interactions. NC event 179312944. muonless event 179312944. 179312944;391;neut;2007-10-06 11:46:34;1;1;W25;R13;C25; 01011847 179312944;391;neut;2007-10-06 11:46:34;1;1;W25;R13;C24; 01011845 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Bern Scanning Laboratory
Hunting muonless interactions...
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
NC event 179312944
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
muonless event 179312944 179312944;391;neut;2007-10-06 11:46:34;1;1;W25;R13;C25; 01011847 179312944;391;neut;2007-10-06 11:46:34;1;1;W25;R13;C24; 01011845 179312944;391;neut;2007-10-06 11:46:34;1;1;W25;R13;C26; 01011669 179312944;391;neut;2007-10-06 11:46:34;1;1;W25;R14;C25; 01012865 179312944;391;neut;2007-10-06 11:46:34;1;1;W25;R12;C25; 01008954
3 Bricks are developed
179312944 11847 09/10/07 1 0.22
179312944 11845 09/10/07 1 0.15
179312944 11669 09/10/07 1 0.14
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
CS predictions
First step – standart: 6 prediction are found in CSD, - not found in any of three bricks.
Need for more sophisticated approach…
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Veto alignment (pl 57 – veto 58)
500 microns
Two alignments !! Veto was moved during exposure.
Is the situation with CSD the same?If yes => Search area=1x1mm
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Veto dublet deformations
Is the situation with CSD the same?If yes => Angular tolerance ~30 mrad.
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Pl 57 deformations
Z Distance CSD – P57Error up to 300 microns
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Full area scan
IP=300 microns, >3-fold-pre-vertexing
“Pre-vertexing” allows to limit number of SB pathes to 75 (~5%)
Emulsions 57,56,55 + CS0,CS1Full area scan
Total number of tracks not found in CSD: about 1300!
(No angular constraints)
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Scanback of pre-vertexed tracks
Initially 75 tracks, 32 stops, 28 stops to analyse (pl 3-53), 43 passing
No converging stopping tracks…..
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Totalscan around stops
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Visual check : SB path 4248
SB track
Smth. interesting
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Vertex found
Good vertex ! But there is a sign of incoming track (see prev. slide)
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Volume scan around vertex
Tracks are visible in veto => This is NOT a neutrino event, but HE cosmics reaction
577748
2938 1211450
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
After scanback of ~1300 tracks two interesting vertices found
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
After scanback of ~1300 tracks two interesting vertices found
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
NC candidate : volume scanNo additional tracks related to vertex are found
2x2cm x 9 plates
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Check presence of tracks in VD (Veto Dublet)
1st alignment 2nd alignment
Pl 57 Pl 58 Pl 59 Pl 58 Pl 59
662 BT MT(8) - - -
762 BT - - MT(8) -
101 BT BT BT BT -
102 BT BT BT - BT
103 BT MT BT - -
104 BT BT BT - -
201 BT - - BT BT
202 BT BT - BT MT
Confirmed: NOT in VETO !
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
NC candidate 1 : detector view
Hadronic shower CG fit
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
NC candidate 1
Hits in TT correspond to possible interaction=> Likely NC event
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
NC candidate 2 : detector view
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
NC candidate 2
No hits, high IP => unlikely.
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
NC candidates 1,2
Checked presence in the CSD – not found…. .
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Effect on CR density discussion...
If no CSD predictions found for one of reasons, then:
1300 tracks to follow => Not possible in 24h/brickStrong selection (maybe few% of total) still leads to fake events (3)Reduction of CR density by factor 5 would be very desirable…
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Predictions from LNGS => Low momentum shower?
• Volume scan 2x2cm 57 plates• VTX reconstruction with IP<50 microns, min Nseg=2:• 5189 2-prong vertices (!)• 86 3-prong (too many to check) (left as the last chance)• 7 4-prong (incoming tracks -> rejected)• 1 5-prong (all 2 seg tracks, high IP – rejected)
• VTX reconstruction with IP<50 microns, min Nseg=5:• 13 2-prong vertices, 2 correlated with prediction: #1 incoming track reconstructed with the gap of 4 plates, #2 incoming track out of volume (re-scanned bigger volume)
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Summary on the event search
1. Standart prediction search gave no consistent tracks in pl 57,56.2. Volume scan around predicted tracks => Some candidates, rejected for various
reasons.3. Fullarea scan with Veto-in cosmics: 1300 tracks to consider4. Pre-vertexing procedure applied, no converging tracks, however 28 stops. TotalScan
is done visual checks – done. 7-prong CR interaction found, rehearsal of vertex analisys is done on this interaction, all scanning tasks in fully automatic mode.
5. Scanback of all ~1300 tracks from pl57-55, not found in Veto is complete
6. One vertex from external interaction is found and confirmed : - NOT in VETO - YES in TT - NOT in CSD
Extract upstream brick?! Reasonable to say Yes.
Event is not found, but the strategy starts to develop.
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Prediction location
Location in pl 57DX=1mm
NO FOUND ? YES
Scanback withIC at CG of cluster
NO STOPS ? YES
Totalscan 5x5mmx10pl
1 PRONGS ? >1
Visual check
NO CONFIRMED ? YES
Scanforth to VETO
YES FOUND IN VD ? NO
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Scenario for muonless event location
NO CS TRACKS ? YES
NO Located ? YES
Prediction location
Volume scan 2x2cm57pl + VETO
around first TT cluster CG
Find all alignmentsErase tracks, present in VD
Pre-vertexing3 prong, IP<300microns
NO Located ? YES
Prediction location
e- Shower searchIn a volume (+VD!)
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Shower confirmation
Check BT in VETO
YES FOUND IN VD ? NO
Check BT in CSD ?
NO FOUND IN VD ? YES
I. Kreslo, LHEP, Bern
Muonless event location strategy
First picture of the algorithm becomes clear
Worked well for two events so far :
One CR and one neutrino (see next talk by C.Pistillo)
Very time consuming, but very precious (νμCC events,Tau-> e, Tau-h
channels) => firther optimisation (minimisation) is crucial.