bone&jointscience - smith & nephew

5
Page – 1 Distal radius modeling supports contemporary volar distal radius plate design Charlie Baker 1 , Tobias Schwägli 2 1 Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA 2 Medivation AG, Windisch, Switzerland Research goal To model the variability of distal radius anatomy to support the design of a new volar distal radius plating system. Figure 1: (a) Distal radius models of standard width (25.6 mm ± 1.17); and (b) wide groups (28.9 mm ± 1.34) (c) Design of new volar distal radius plate (D-RAD Standard Left) using the standard width distal radius model. Vol 05 – No 02 – April 2015 Pre-clinical study 1a 25.6 mm 28.9 mm 1b 1c Design rationale Clinical study Economic analysis Registry data Literature review Bone&Joint Science Our Innovation in Focus Type of evidence Clinical relevance Distal radius fracture is one of the most commonly observed orthopaedic injuries. 1,2 Treatment via open reduction and volar plating is common. However, this method can be associated with palmar soft-tissue irritation from plate prominence, due to poor implant design or positioning. Anatomic CT-based modeling can be used in plate design to improve contouring and sizing. This may reduce postoperative complications such as soft-tissue irritation. Key result The population was stratified according to distal radius width ( Figure 1a–b). A mean anatomic model for standard and wide groups was then created using statistical techniques. Each model was then used to design the contour, profile and screw trajectories of the D-RAD SMART PACK™ Single-Use Volar Distal Radius Plating System (Smith & Nephew) ( Figure 1c). Important considerations Cadaver testing validated the fit of this newly developed volar distal radius plating system, confirming the value of the anatomic models. Additional research would be needed to confirm the potential benefits of this design for patients.

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2021

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bone&JointScience - Smith & Nephew

Page – 1

Distal radius modeling supports contemporary volar distal radius plate design

Charlie Baker 1, Tobias Schwägli 2

1 Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA

2 Medivation AG, Windisch, Switzerland

Research goal To model the variability of distal radius anatomy to support the design of a new volar distal radius plating system.

Figure 1: (a) Distal radius models of standard width (25.6 mm ± 1.17); and (b) wide groups (28.9 mm ± 1.34) (c) Design of new volar distal radius plate (D-RAD Standard Left) using the standard width distal radius model.

Vol 05 – No 02 – April 2015

Pre-clinical study

1a

25.6 mm

28.9 mm

1b

1c

Design rationale

Clinical study

Economic analysis

Registry data

Literature review

Bone&JointScience Our Innovation in Focus

Type of evidence

Clinical relevance

Distal radius fracture is one of the most commonly observed orthopaedic injuries.1,2 Treatment via open reduction and volar plating is common. However, this method can be associated

with palmar soft-tissue irritation from plate prominence, due to poor implant design or positioning. Anatomic CT-based modeling can be used in plate design to improve contouring and sizing.

This may reduce postoperative complications such as soft-tissue irritation.

Key result

The population was stratified according to distal radius width (Figure 1a–b). A mean anatomic model for standard and wide groups was then created using statistical techniques.

Each model was then used to design the contour, profile and screw trajectories of the D-RAD SMART PACK™ Single-Use Volar Distal Radius Plating System (Smith & Nephew) (Figure 1c).

Important considerations

Cadaver testing validated the fit of this newly developed volar distal radius plating system, confirming the value of the anatomic models.

Additional research would be needed to confirm the potential benefits of this design for patients.

Page 2: Bone&JointScience - Smith & Nephew

Page – 2Bone&JointScience Vol 05 – No 02 – April 2015

Distal radius modeling supports contemporary volar distal radius plate design

Background

Distal radius fractures are among the most commonly observed skeletal injuries, accounting for approximately 15% of all extremity fractures.1,2 Moreover, these fractures are associated with significant functional impairment.1,2 Volar distal radius plates were introduced to improve fracture reduction, support early postoperative mobilization, and decrease the incidence of soft-tissue irritation.3 However, anatomical variation from patient to patient represents a design challenge that has yet to be addressed. Existing implant design is based on limited knowledge about the target anatomy. Anthropomorphic data from the literature is incomplete. Traditionally implant design and fit has been evaluated on a handful of cadaver specimens. However variability of bone shape is difficult to design for using such a limited sample size. Instead, statistical shape analysis techniques can be used to study anatomy diversity in a population4.

Therefore, an analysis was performed to determine if distal radius anatomical variability within a representative population can be effectively modeled, thereby improving the fit and function of new volar distal radius plate designs.

Methods – Computed tomography (CT) images were produced for 29

human radii (Figure 2a). – The surface points of each distal radius were modeled to allow

for a three-dimensional representation of the anatomy (Figure 2b).

– The width of each distal radius was assessed by measuring the widest anatomical landmark proximal to the watershed line (Figure 3).

– The width distribution of the input population was split into two groups to mimic the sales units of the existing PERI-LOC™ Volar Distal Radius implant. The group was split into either standard (N = 22, 76%) or wide (N = 7, 24%) subgroups.

– Each group of models was then used to generate a mean statistical shape model.

2a 2b

Figure 2: (a) Example CT image of one human radius (b) distal part of radius used for model creation.

Figure 3: Distal radius width distribution among the 29 subjects (top); Grouping of distal radius width distributions. (a) Standard: 25.6mm (± 1.17); (b) Wide: 28.9 (± 1.34) (bottom)

3a

25.6 mm

3b

28.9 mm

Page 3: Bone&JointScience - Smith & Nephew

Page – 3Bone&JointScience Vol 05 – No 02 – April 2015

Distal radius modeling supports contemporary volar distal radius plate design

Figure 5: Cadaveric fluoroscopic design validation

Figure 4: Fixed angle screw trajectories of the D-RAD SMART PACK.

5ºH4

0ºH3

0ºH6 7º

H2

14.3ºH5

21.3ºH1

41ºH1

13ºH2

9.6ºH3

4ºH4

20ºH6 38º

H5

H1

H2 H3 H4

Distal

Left-HandPlate

H5 H6

Results – Analysis suggests that the aforementioned distal radius

modeling technique is a valid, accurate representation of the subject population’s anatomy.

– Each model was used to design the contour, profile and screw trajectories of the newly developed standard and wide four-hole volar distal radius plates included in the D-RAD SMART PACK™ System.

• The contours of the D-RAD SMART PACK Standard and Wide plates conform to the volar distal radius near the watershed line. Distal plate positioning provides support to both the lunate facet and the radial styloid.

• The D-RAD SMART PACK System allows for both fixed and variable angle screw trajectories through the use of the provided instrumentation.

• The divergent fixed angle screw trajectories were designed for optimal placement across a population of specimens using the standard and wide models. Key considerations for fixed angle screw trajectory placement were: supporting the lunate facet, capturing radial styloid fragments, and allowing distal plate placement while avoiding screw placement in the radiocarpal joint. Fixed angle screw trajectories are shown (Figure 4).

• The variable angle trajectory of Variable-Angle Locked Plating (VLP™) allows the surgeon to adapt to individual anatomy and fracture patterns as needed. This VLP technology is the same as used in the PERI-LOC™ VLP systems (Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA).

– The accuracy of the distal radius models was verified during cadaveric implantation and fluoroscopic testing (Figure 5), where 29 plates were matched against cadaver specimens to confirm plate fit.

Page 4: Bone&JointScience - Smith & Nephew

Page – 4Bone&JointScience Vol 05 – No 02 – April 2015

Distal radius modeling supports contemporary volar distal radius plate design

Conclusion

The described distal radius modelling technique has enabled the design of anatomic volar distal radius plates. A morphologic study, cadaveric implantation and fluoroscopic evaluation each showed that the two plate designs (standard and wide) will meet the majority of the population’s anatomical variations. More research is necessary to determine if anatomically-modelled volar distal radius plates can reduce soft tissue irritation.3

Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge Catherine Dunbar and Matt Burns for their editorial

contribution during the preparation of this manuscript.

References1. Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand

Clin. May 2012;28(2):113–125.

2. Nana AD, Joshi A, Lichtman DM. Plating of the distal radius. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. May–Jun 2005;13(3):159–171.

3. Buzzell JE, Weikert DR, Watson JT, Lee DH. Precontoured fixed-angle volar distal radius plates: a comparison of anatomic fit. J Hand Surg Am. Sep 2008;33(7):1144–1152.

4. Kozic N, Weber S, Buchler P, Lutz C, Reimers N, Ballester M, Reyes M. Optimization of orthopaedic implant design using statistical shape space analysis based on level sets. Medical Image Analysis. 2010; 14(3):265-275.

Page 5: Bone&JointScience - Smith & Nephew

Disclaimer Great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of the information contained in the publication. How-ever, neither Smith & Nephew, nor the authors can be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of the information contained in this publication. The statements or opinions contained in editorials and articles in this journal are solely those of the authors thereof and not of Smith & Nephew. The products, procedures, and thera-pies described are only to be applied by certified and trained medical professionals in environments specially de-signed for such procedures. No suggested test or procedure should be carried out unless, in the reader’s professional judgment, its risk is justified. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, we recommend that independent verification of diagnosis, drugs dosages, and operating methods should be made before any action is taken. Although all advertising material is expected to conform to ethical (medical) standards, inclusion in this publication does not constitute a guarantee or endorsement of the quality or value of such product or of the claims made of it by its manu-facturer. Some of the products, names, instruments, treatments, logos, designs, etc. referred to in this journal are also protected by patents and trademarks or by other intellectual property protection laws even though specific reference to this fact is not always made in the text. Therefore, the appearance of a name, instrument, etc. without designation as proprietary is not to be construed as a representation by the publisher that it is in the public domain. This publica-tion, including all parts thereof, is legally protected by copyright. Any use, exploitation or commercialization outside the narrow limits of copyrights legislation, without the publisher’s consent, is illegal and liable to prosecution. This applies in particular to photostat reproduction, copying, scanning or duplication of any kind, translating, preparation of microfilms and electronic data processing and storage. Institutions’ subscriptions allow to reproduce tables of content or prepare lists of articles including abstracts for internal circulation within the institutions concerned. Permission of the publisher is required for resale or distribution outside the institutions. Permission of the publisher is required for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations. Permission of the publisher is required to store or use electronically any material contained in this journal, including any article or part of an article. For inquiries contact the publisher at the address indicated.

Lit.No: 01323 V1 04/15 Produced and published the Scientific & Medical Affairs Department, Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG.

Published April 2015Copyright © 2015 by Smith & NephewSmith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG, Oberneuhofstrasse 10d, 6340 Baar, Switzerland

™Trademark of Smith & Nephew. Certain marks Reg. US Pat. & TM Off. Bone&JointScience is available on Smith & Nephew’s Education and Evidence website, www.smith-nephew.com/education