cee 320 spring 2007 intelligent transportation systems (its) cee 320 steve muench
TRANSCRIPT
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7Intelligent Transportation Systems
(ITS)
CEE 320Steve Muench
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Outline
• Need for traffic solutions• Possible solutions• Intelligent Transportation Systems
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Road Use Growth
From the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Statistics 2003
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Changes in Congested Peak-Period Travel
Change in Congested Peak-Period Travel (1982-2000)
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1982 1990 1994 2000
Year
Per
cent
of
Pea
k-P
erio
d T
rave
l in
Con
gest
ion
Los Angeles, CA
Seattle-Everett, WA
Boston, MA
Denver, CO
New York, NY-Northeastern, NJ
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Problems Caused by Congestion
• Increased…– Travel time– Travel cost– Air pollution– Accident risk
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Options
• Construct new roads– Covered in geometric design– Not likely to happen on a large scale
• Reduce Traffic– Travel demand management– Alternative transportation
• Increase existing infrastructure capacity– Uses intelligent transportation systems (ITS)
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Construction Is Part of the Solution
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Option 1: Construction
Highway Construction Cost Sampling
Project Total Cost Lane-Miles
Cost per
Lane-Mile
Route 3, North Boston $395.0 million 42 $9.4 million
I-4 Tampa to Orlando $403.0 million 73 $5.5 million
I-5 Oregon $30.0 million 5.16 $5.8 million
US 26 Sunset Hwy. Oregon $10.6 million 2.24 $4.8 million
US 12 near Walla Walla River $36.4 million 25 $1.5 million
US 101 on Olympic Peninsula $1.8 million 0.8 $2.2 million
General ConclusionHighways cost $1 to $10 million per lane-mile to build
San Francisco’s Embarcadero Freeway: Removed 1991
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Option 2: Alternative Transport
But significant new rail capacity will face the same hurdles as new highway capacity.
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Sounder Commuter Rail
• Tacoma-Seattle– Began 2000– 4 trips each way daily
• Everett-Seattle– Began 2003– 2 trips each way daily
New Slide
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7New Slide
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Seattle-Everett Interurban Railway Co. (1907)
Asahel Curtis Photo Company Collection, University of Washington Digital Collection
New Slide
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Sounder vs. Interurban
Sounder Interurban
Tacoma service 2000 – present 1902 – 1928
Everett service 2003 – present 1910 – 1939
One-way trip time 52 – 58 minutes 70 – 100 minutes
Daily departures from Seattle 6 37
Number of stops 9 30
Top speed 80 mph 60 mph
One-way fare $3.00-$4.00 $0.60inflation adjusted: $12.00
Hauled freight? No Yes
Owner Sound Transit Puget Sound Energy
New Slide
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Option 2: Alternative Transport
SkyTran: Personal MagLev Transporter
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Option 3: Increase Existing Infrastructure Capacity
• An alternative to expensive new highway construction is the implementation of strategies that promote more efficient utilization of transportation infrastructures.
• These strategies are known as the Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), which aims to reduce travel time, ease delay and congestion, improve safety, and reduce pollutant emissions
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Hig
hw
ay C
apac
ity
Full Capacity
How Much Capacity Is There?
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents thanby recurring peak period congestion.H
igh
way
Cap
acit
y
Remaining Effective Capacity
How Much Capacity Is There?
Incidents can comprise 50% of peak period congestion.1 min delay in clearance = 4 to 5 min of traffic backup.
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Work zones: major cost is delay imparted to the traveler
Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents thanby recurring peak period congestion.H
igh
way
Cap
acit
y
Remaining Effective Capacity
How Much Capacity Is There?
Caltrans reports 20% of freeway centerline miles are under construction.
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Work zones: major cost is delay imparted to the traveler
Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents thanby recurring peak period congestion.H
igh
way
Cap
acit
y
Remaining Effective Capacity
How Much Capacity Is There?
Weather: Snow, fog, rain can all restrict capacity
75% of NHS is subject to snow & 100% is subject to rain.
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Work zones: major cost is delay imparted to the traveler
Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents thanby recurring peak period congestion.H
igh
way
Cap
acit
y
Remaining Effective Capacity
How Much Capacity Is There?
Weather: Snow, fog, rain can all restrict capacity
Special events and disasters further restrict capacity
Periodic events can cause further restrict capacity.
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Work zones: major cost is delay imparted to the traveler
Incidents: more delay is caused by incidents thanby recurring peak period congestion.H
igh
way
Cap
acit
y
Remaining Effective Capacity
How Much Capacity Is There?
Weather: Snow, fog, rain can all restrict capacity
Special events and disasters further restrict capacity
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Hig
hw
ay C
apac
ity
Remaining Effective Capacity
How Much Capacity Is There?
ITS
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Five Primary Functional Areas of ITS
• Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS)• Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS)• Commercial Vehicle Operations (CVO)• Advanced Public Transportation Systems (APTS)• Advanced Vehicle Control Systems (AVCS)
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Advanced Traffic Management Systems
Photo from the Human-Computer Interaction Lab: University of Maryland
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
WSDOT Traffic Systems Management Center
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
WSDOT Traffic Systems Management Center
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
WSDOT Traffic Systems Management Center
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
ATMS: Snoqualmie Pass
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Advanced Traveler Information Systems
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
ATIS: trafficgauge
htt
p:/
/ww
w.t
raffi
cgau
ge.c
om
/in
dex.h
tml
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
WAP Traffic
www.wiresoft.net/traffic/seattle
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
ATIS: Traffic Cameras
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Commercial Vehicle Operations
• Apply, pay for and receive permits, registrations, and licenses electronically
• Share of common trucking data across agencies • Exchange information electronically with
roadside enforcement personnel• Electronic “screening” of trucks for safety or
other regulatory violations• Share information across state lines and with
Federal information systems
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
CVO: Weigh-In-Motion System
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Advanced Public Transportation Systems
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
An Example of APTS
http://busview.its.washington.edu/busview_launch.jsp?maps=gif
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
APTS: Bus Signal Priority
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Advanced Vehicle Control Systems
Intelligent Cruise Control (ICC)
System
Lexus LS430/460, ES-350Benz S-Class, E55, AMG, CLS, SL, CLAcura RLAudi A6, A8, Q7Cadillac DTS, STS, XLRHonda LegendInfinity M, Q45Jaguar XK-RBMW 3, 5, 7 SeriesNisan PrimeraRange Rover SportToyota Sienna XLE, AvalonVolkswagon Phaeton, PassatRenault Vel SatisVolvo S80
New Slide
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
VW and Google Earth
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
CE
E 3
20S
pri
ng
200
7
Windows Live Local Street Level