civil law review digests assoc

Upload: john-erickson-chua-yap

Post on 03-Jun-2018

240 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    1/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    *WARNING & DISCLAIMER: This compilation contains case digests for Civil Law Review 2. Some of the

    contents are personal digests of the authors and some are gathered through research. Contents may not be

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 1

    CIVIL LAW

    REVIEW 2

    Atty. VIVIANA MARTIN PAGUIRIGAN

    School Year 2013 2014

    ARAAG! "AR#N $.

    %A$ANA! &AN#T% G.

    &A'AYA&AY! $#TSY R.

    ()l*gat*o+, - o+tract, Sale, 'ea,e Part+er,h*/ Age+cy

    re*t Tra+,act*o+, Tort, - aage,

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    2/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    accurate, hence, reading the cases in full text is highly recommended. This is for personal use only and no

    copyright infringement intended.

    LIST OF CASES

    SY 2013 2014

    OBLIGATIONS & CONTRACTSARTICLES 1156- 1246

    Macasaet vs. COA173 SCRA 352Phil. Export vs. Eusebio Cost.et al.!ul" 13# 2$$%&a'uili' vs. CA.2(( SCRA 7)Co*apia +eeral vs. Ara,a7 Phil. %55-eloso vs. otaosa.13 Phil. 7/0a"la vs. Sila' trasit73 Phil. 557ee vs. e +u,*a..1)7 SCRA 2770ar,a'a vs. CA..2() SCRA 1$5

    PC vs. CA..1(1 SCRA 33%Picart vs. S*ith37 Phil )13Cosoli4ate4 0a vs. CA a4 ia,..Sept. 11# 2$$3Sch*i4t, trasport vs. trasport -eture..April 22# 2$$5Real vs. 0elo.!a. 2(# 2$$7Phil. Co**uicatios vs. +lobe &eleco*..Ma" 25# 2$$%S0&C vs. CA2%/ SCRA 2$(Macta Cebu 6tl Airport vs. &u4tu4.ov. 1%# 2$$)So' o vs. 8a9aii Phil. Co..%7 Phil )21Corte, vs. CA.!ul" 12# 2$$(+il vs. CA a4 8eirs o: MatulacSept. 12# 2$$3Spouses Ra"os vs. CA a4 Mira4a..!ul" 1%# 2$$%Cor4ero vs. .S. Maa'e*et evt.Oct. 31# 2$$(

    Calero vs. Cario.1$7 Phil. 5%/&R0 vs. CA.177 SCRA 7))Phil. 0loo*i' Mills vs. CA a4 &R0Oct. 15# 2$$3Coutr" 0aers vs. CA..2$1 SCRA %5)Co*. Cre4it vs. CA..1(/ SCRA 1Pr"ce Corp. vs. Pa'cor.Ma" (# 2$$5Asiatrust evt 0a vs. Cocepts &ra4i'.!ue 2$# 2$$3!iso vs. CA1(% SCRA 33/o vs. ;!S Eco

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    3/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    a'a &elephoe Co vs. CA23$ SCRA 351

    &ras. Paci:ic 64. -s. CA235 SCRA %/%

    Silahis vs. 6AC.1)$ SCRA 21

    racia vs. CA.1(2 SCRA

    753

    0P6 vs. CA =127/@..!ue )# 2$$(

    Citiba vs. Sabeiao.eb. 12# 2$$7Peoples 0a vs. S"vels.1(% SCRA 2%7

    Bou' vs. CA1/( SCRA

    2%7

    PS0a vs. Spouses Maalac =12/[email protected] 2(# 2$$5

    Astro Electroics vs. Phil. Export [email protected]. 23# 2$$3

    Car*elcra:t vs. RC..1)( SCRA 3/3

    Acol vs. PC60a =13$(@.!ul" 25# 2$$(

    &iu vs. Platiu* Plas.eb. 2)# 2$$7

    Avo vs. uaec. 2$#

    2$$(

    Piltel vs. &ecso..Ma" 7# 2$$%

    P0 vs. Pa4illa =13$)@.1/( SCRA 537

    ;C 8ol4i's vs. CA =1311@32/ SCRA (((

    &aa" Recreatio vs. austo [email protected] 12# 2$$5

    lea4o vs. lea4o.March %# 2$$/

    +ilchrist vs. Cu44" =131%@2/ Phil. 5%2

    Motecillo vs. Re"es =1317@!ul" 2(# 2$$2

    racisco vs. 8errera =131)@.ov. 21# 2$$2

    Coroel vs. Costatio [email protected]. 7# 2$$3

    au4icio vs. Arias =131/@..%3 Phil. 27$

    -illaueva vs. CA =131/@..2%% SCRA 3/5

    A4el:a vs. CA =132%@2%$ SCRA 5(5

    Serra vs. CA22/ SCRA(1

    Malbarosa vs. CA =132%@..April 3$# 2$$3

    -4a. e Ape vs. CA [email protected] 15# 2$$5

    Ma"or vs. 0ele.!ue 3# 2$$%

    ARTICLES 1338 1428

    0autista vs. CA..Au'. 11# 2$$%

    au4e 8erae, vs. elos A'eles27 SCRA 127(

    Clau4el vs. CA1// SCRA 113

    0er*a Me*orial vs. Che'..Ma" (# 2$$5

    +u,*a 0ocali' vs. 0oevie.2$( SCRA (()

    Euatorial Realt" vs. Ma":air &heater..2(% SCRA %)3

    Rivera vs. el Rosario =13)1@..!a. 15# 2$$%

    &aa" Recreatio vs. austoApril 12# 2$$5

    Republic vs. avi4 =13)[email protected]'. 1(# 2$$%

    Air race vs. CA =separate [email protected]%5 SCRA %)5

    Chia 0ai' vs. CA =13)[email protected] SCRA 37)

    Ca49alla4er vs. S*ith 0ell &ra4i'.7 Phil. %(1

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 3

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    4/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    -4a. e 0ucio vs. Estate o: 4e eo.15( SCRA 353

    Asia Pro4uctios vs. Pao..2$5 SCRA

    Averia vs. Averia =1%$3@Au'. 13# 2$$%

    Cle*eo vs. obre'at =1%$3@Sept. /# 2$$%

    ir*e vs. 0ual EterprisesOct. 23# 2$$3Su*ipat vs. 0a'a et al =1%$/@Au'. 13# 2$$%

    8ulst vs. PR 0uil4ers...Sept. 3# 2$$7

    8ulst vs. PR 0uil4ersSept. 25# 2$$)

    +ocha vs. 8eirs o: 0aba.Au'. 1/# 2$$3

    oril4a vs. R&C..1(/ SCRA

    351

    Suta" vs. CA.251 SCRA

    %3$

    &eDa Mareti' vs. CA..1%) SCRA 3%7

    0P vs. A4il..1(1 SCRA

    3$7

    ARTICLES 1429 1519

    Roblett vs. CA.2(( SCRA

    71

    0ucto vs. +abar..55 SCRA %//

    Olaco vs. CA.22$ SCRA

    (5(

    Chiao Si' &a vs. CA22) SCRA 75

    +icao vs. +e'ato157 SCRA

    1%1

    Cru, vs. era4o.ec. /# 2$$5

    Pi'ol vs. CA.22( SCRA

    11)

    Portu'al vs. CA15/ SCRA

    17/

    Sache, vs. Ri'os =1%7/@.%5 SCRA 3()

    Eulo'io vs. ApelesSept. 2$#

    2$$/

    Rosario vs. PC6 =1%)%@ov. 11# 2$$5

    Pa'talua vs. -4a. e Ma,ao Sept. 13# 2$$7

    oril4a vs. R&C =1%/1@!a. 2%# 1/)/Ola'uer vs. ocsi =1%/[email protected]. 12# 2$$7

    oris vs. CA =1%/(@..1/3 SCRA

    (/%

    +aisao vs. 6CA =15$%@.!ue )# 2$$(

    a9"ers Publishi' vs. &abora =15$%@..13 SCRA (/%

    ura vs. 6AC.13) SCRA

    %)/

    A,ar vs. Bap4a'o13 SCRA %)(

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 4

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    5/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    ARICLES 1520 1610

    Ra4io9ealth vs. Palileo =15%%@1/7 SCRA 2%5

    u'ui4 vs. CA..171 SCRA

    213

    &orreca*po vs. Ali4o'a =15%%@.eb. 2)# 2$$7

    +urrea vs. Suplico.April 2(#2$$(

    Moles vs. 6AC1(/ SCRA

    777

    -illostas vs. CA.21$ SCRA

    %/1

    Spouses " vs. Arri,a =15%)#5)#5/@..Au'. 17# 2$$(

    e +u,*a vs. &o"ota =15((@..ov. 2/# 2$$(+oo4"ear vs. S" =15((@.ov. /# 2$$5

    -illarica vs. CA =1($1@2( SCRA 1)/

    eal vs. CA.155 SCRA

    3/5

    0uce vs. CA157 SCRA

    33$

    Satos vs. CA17/ SCRA

    3(3

    A4orable vs. 6acala1$3 Phil %)1

    0a4o' vs. Austria.31 Phil. %7$

    0a"ue vs. boloro..1%3 SCRA

    %12" vs. CA.2%(

    SCRA 7$3

    -er4a4 vs. CA..25( SCRA

    5/3

    LEASE

    0P6 vs. o*i'o.ov. 27#

    2$$(

    apil vs. &C =1(5%@.Sept. 2(# 2$$(Parilla vs. Pilar =1(7)@.ov. 3$# 2$$(

    +o ;i' vs. +eroi*o.)1 Phil. %%5

    CMS 6vest*et vs. 6AC13/ SCRA 75

    er*i vs. CA...1/( SCRA

    725

    Matruste vs. CA =1(7)@17/ SCRA

    137

    Ro*a Catholic vs. CA2(/ SCRA

    1%7

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    6/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    PARTNERSHIP

    A'a4 vs. *abato23 SCRA

    1223

    Obillos vs. C6R =17(/@.13/ SCRA

    %3(

    Pascual vs. C6R.1(( SCRA

    5($

    itoDua vs. itoDua =1771

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    7/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    Ester Shippi' ies vs. CA.23% SCRA 7)

    lore4o vs. CA..2(5 SCRA

    (7)

    P0 vs. CA.23) SCRA

    2$

    Si'a

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    8/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    0P vs. RC23( SCRA

    117

    TORTS AND DAAGES

    Pci easi' vs. CP0 =127(@!ul" %# 2$$)

    Ca4iete vs. Macas =217/@..ov. 1%# 2$$)

    Capili vs. Car4aa..ov. 2# 2$$(

    Pro:essioal Services 6c. vs. A'aa.!a. 31# 2$$7

    +la Peoples u*ber vs. 6AC173 SCRA %(5

    A:rica vs. Caltex1( SCRA

    %%)

    ula" vs. CA.2%3

    SCRA 22$

    Custo4io vs. Ca..253 SCRA

    2)3

    ibi vs. 6AC.21%

    SCRA 1(Coca Cola vs. CA227

    SCRA 2/3

    Cit" o: Maila vs. &eotico..22 SCRA 2(7

    +uilatco vs. Cit" o: a'upa171 SCRA 3)3

    +otesco vs. Chatto..21$ SCRA

    1/

    MM&C vs. CA2/)

    SCRA %/5

    +elu, vs. CA..!ul" 2$#

    1/(1

    lores vs. Pie4a =22$(@..ov. 1%#

    2$$)

    -illaueva vs. CP0327 SCRA

    3/1

    6hel4er vs. CA..122 SCRA

    577

    &a vs. CA..23/

    SCRA 311

    +eral4e, vs. CA..23$

    SCRA 321

    People vs. Pra4es.23/ SCRA

    %11

    RCP6 vs. CA1/5SCRA 1%7

    -4a. e Me4ia vs. Crescecia..// Phil. 5$7

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 6

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    9/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    OBLIGATIONS &CONTRACTS

    !LA"IO # ACASAET & ASSOCIATES$ INC% "%COA '()

    PHILIPPINE TOURIS AUTHORITY+.R. o. )37%) Ma" 12# 1/)/

    !ACTS*O 15 Septe*ber 1/77 respo4et Philippie

    &ouris* Authorit" =P&A@ etere4 ito a Cotract :orGProDect esi' a4 Maa'e*et Services :or the4evelop*et o: the propose4 Ha*boa'a +ol: a4Coutr" ClubI i Ha*boa'a Cit" 9ith petitioerco*pa"# but ori'iall" 9ith lavio ; Macasaet aloe.

    4er Article 6- o: sai4 Cotract# petitioer 9as to beetitle4 to seve =7J@ o: the Gactual costructio cost.G

    Pursuat to the :ore'oi' Sche4ule# the P&A*a4e perio4ic pa"*ets o: the stipulate4 pro:essioal:ees to petitioer. A4# upo co*pletio o: the proDect#P&A pai4 petitioers 9hat it perceive4 to be the balaceo: the latterKs pro:essioal :ees.

    6t ture4 out# ho9ever# that a:ter the proDect 9asco*plete4# P&A pai4 Supra Costructio Co*pa"# the*ai cotractor# the a44itioal su* o: P3#1%)#1/).2(represeti' the escalatio cost o: the cotract price 4ue

    to the icrease i the price o: costructio *aterials.

    po leari' o: the price escalatio# petitioerreueste4 pa"*et o: P21/#3$2.%7 a44itioalpro:essioal :ee represeti' seve =7J@ percet o:P3#1%)#1/).2(.O 3 !ul" 1/)5 P&A 4eie4 pa"*et o the 'rou4 thatGthe subDect price escalatio re:erre4 to icrease4 cost o:costructio *aterials a4 4i4 ot etail a44itioal 9oro the part o: petitioer as to etitle it to a44itioalco*pesatio u4er Article -6 o: the cotract.G

    ISSUE* Fhether or ot the price escalatio shoul4 beiclu4e4 i the G:ial actual proDect cost.G

    HELD* &hat a escalatio clause 9as ot speci:icall"provi4e4 :or i the Cotract is o: o *o*et either :or it*a" be cosi4ere4 as alrea4" Gbuilt

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    10/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    PHILIPPINE E+PORT AND !OREIGN LOANGUARANTEE CORPORATION "% "%P% EUSEBIO

    CONSTRUCTION$ INC%G%R% N,% 140047 ./ 13$ 2004

    !ACTS*

    O 11 !ue 1/)1# SO0 a4 the Doit veture-PEC6 a4 AD"al execute4 the service cotract :or thecostructio o: the 6stitute o: Ph"sical &herap" ?Me4ical Rehabilitatio Ceter# Phase 66# i 0a'h4a4#6ra# 9herei the Doit veture cotractor u4ertoo toco*plete the ProDect 9ithi a perio4 o: 5%7 4a"s or 1)*oths. 4er the Cotract# the !oit -eture 9oul4suppl" *apo9er a4 *aterials# a4 SO0 9oul4 re:u4to the :or*er 25J o: the proDect cost i 6rai iar a4the 75J i S 4ollars at the excha'e rate o: 1 iar to3.37777 S ollars.

    &he costructio# 9hich 9as suppose4 to start

    o 2 !ue 1/)1# co**ece4 ol" o the last 9ee o:Au'ust 1/)1. 0ecause o: this 4ela" a4 the slo9pro'ress o: the costructio 9or 4ue to so*e setbacsa4 4i::iculties# the ProDect 9as ot co*plete4 o 15ove*ber 1/)2 as sche4ule4. 0ut i October 1/)2#upo :oreseei' the i*possibilit" o: *eeti' the 4ea4liea4 upo the reuest o: Al Ahli 0a# the Doit veturecotractor 9ore4 :or the ree9al or extesio o: thePer:or*ace 0o4 a4 A4vace Pa"*et +uaratee.

    &he suret" bo4 9as also exte4e4 :or aotherperio4 o: oe "ear# :ro* 12 Ma" 1/)2 to 12 Ma"1/)3.1) &he Per:or*ace 0o4 9as :urther exte4e4t9elve ti*es up to ) ece*ber 1/)(# 9hile the A4vacePa"*et +uaratee 9as exte4e4 three ti*es *ore upto 2% Ma" 1/)% 9he the latter 9as cacelle4 a:ter :ullre:u4 or rei*burse*et b" the Doit veture cotractor.&he suret" bo4 9as lie9ise exte4e4 to ) Ma" 1/)7.

    As o: March 1/)(# the status o: the ProDect 9as51J acco*plishe4# *eai' the structures 9ere alrea4":iishe4. &he re*aii' %7J cosiste4 i electro 5$$pesos o the 3$th o: !ue# 1/$1# a4 the re*ai4er atthe rate o: 1$$ pesos a *oth# pa"able o the 3$th 4a"o: each *oth# util the etire )#$$$ pesos 9as pai4.&he 4e:e4at pai4 %$$ pesos a4 o *ore.

    &he plaiti:: brou'ht this actio i the court to:oreclose a *ort'a'e :or )#$$$ pesos upo certai la4i the Provice o: e"te. A 4e*urrer to the co*plait

    9as overrule4# but to the or4er overruli' it the4e:e4at 4i4 ot except. &he 4e:e4at as9ere4#

    alle'i' that the 4ocu*et# the basis o: the plaiti::sclai*# 9as execute4 throu'h error o his part a4throu'h :rau4 o the part o: the plaiti::. A trial 9as ha4a4 Du4'*et 9as etere4 :or the plaiti:: as pra"e4 :ori its co*plait. &he 4e:e4at *ove4 :or a e9 trial othe 'rou4 that the 4ecisio 9as ot Dusti:ie4 b" theevi4ece# this *otio 9as 4eie4# to its 4eial the4e:e4at accepte4# a4 he has brou'ht the case to theSC :or revie9.

    ISSUE*Fhether the 4ebtor is to be cosi4ere4 to be i

    4e:ault.

    HELD*&his suit 9as co**ece4 o the 12th 4a" o:

    !ue# 1/$3. &here 9as o provisio i the cotract b"9hich# upo :ailure to pa" oe istall*et o: the 4ebt#the 9hole 4ebt shoul4 thereupo beco*e at ocepa"able. Fe are o: the opiio that the obli'atio ca bee:orce4 i this actio :or ol" the a*out 4ue a4pa"able o the 12th 4a" o: !ue# 1/$3.

    &he court belo9 'ave o cre4it :or the pa"*eto: %$$ pesos a4*itte4 b" the co*plait to have bee

    receive4 b" the plaiti::. 6t is allo9e4 iterest upo theetire 4ebt :ro* the 1st 4a" o: !ul"# 1/$1. &he cotract4oes ot provi4e :or the pa"*et o: a" iterest. &hereis o provisio i it 4eclari' expressl" that the :ailure topa" 9he 4ue shoul4 put the 4ebtor i 4e:ault. &here

    9as there:ore o 4e:ault 9hich 9oul4 *ae hi* liable :oriterest util a 4e*a4 9as *a4e. =Civil Co4e# art. 11$$LMaresa# Co*. o Civil Co4e# vol )# p. 5(.@

    ARIANO "ELOSO$ ET AL% "S% ANICETA!ONTANOSA

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 14

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    15/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    G% R% N,% 4874% ' 2$ 1909

    !ACTS*Plaiti::s Mariao# a*iaa# a4 Melchor

    -eloso are the sole la9:ul heirs o: +avio -eloso a40ueavetura -eloso# their :ather a4 brother#respectivel"L 9hile e:e4ats are Aiceta otaosa#

    as 9i4o9 o: Roberto AcaDas# a4 loretia# eoa#Maria# !ua# Ro*ual4o# -iceta# a4 elix# all o: thesura*e o: AcaDas# the la9:ul chil4re o: the 4ecease4Roberto# a4 Este:aia otaosa# *other a4 le'al'uar4ia o: the *ior !ose AcaDas.

    &hat at the 4eath o: +avio -eloso# RobertoAcaDas o9e4 hi* the su* o: 5#$(5 pesos 9hich he ha4borro9e4 prior to the "ear 1))1L i the apportio*et o:the estate# this 4ebt o: 5#$(5 pesos 9et to0ueavetura -eloso as his portioL that i the "ear1))2# Roberto AcaDas# a:ter havi' aco9le4'e4 thetras:er o: his i4ebte4ess b" iheritace to

    0ueavetura -eloso# cotiue4 to receive su*s o:*oe" :ro* the latter o: the sa*e co4itios# that is# asloas# a4 bou4 hi*sel: to *ae aual pa"*ets isu'ar.

    O the 11th o: October# 1))3# the 4ebt o:Roberto AcaDas a*oute4 to 1$#%%/. 1) pesos 9hichrose to 1%#%3/. %$ pesos# 9hich su*# ho9ever# 9asre4uce4 to 12#3(5. 2$ pesos b" the pa"*et o: 2#$7%.2$ pesos o accout. p to the "ear 1)/3 thee:e4ats *a4e pa"*ets a*outi' to (%2. 27 pesos

    9hich re4uce4 the a*out o9i' to 11#722. %3 pesos.

    O the 4eath o: 0ueavetura -eloso# thee:e4ats# as his sole a4 la9:ul heirs# iherite4# a4that sa*e "ear 4ivi4e4 bet9ee the* all his propert"

    9ith the exceptio o: the above

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    16/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    SO!RONIO T% BAYLA "% SILANG TRA!!IC CO%$INC%$

    G%R% N,% L-48195 '() 48196 ' 1$ 1942

    !ACTS*Petitioers istitute4 a actio i the C6 o:

    Cavite a'aist the respo4et Sila' &ra::ic Co.# 6c. to

    recover certai su*s o: *oe" 9hich the" ha4 pai4severall" to the corporatio o accout o: shares o:stoc the" i4ivi4uall" a'ree4 to tae a4 pa" :or u4ercertai speci:ie4 ter*s a4 co4itios that# subscriber:urther a'rees that i: he :ails to pa" a" o: sai4istall*et 9he 4ue# or to per:or* a" o: the a:oresai4co4itios# or i: sai4 shares shall be attache4 or levie4upo b" cre4itors o: the sai4 subscriber# the the sai4shares are to revert to the seller a4 the pa"*etsalrea4" *a4e are to be :or:eite4 i :avor o: sai4 seller#a4 the latter *a" the tae possessio# 9ithoutresorti' to court procee4i's.I

    &he respo4et corporatio set up the 4e:esethat the subscribe4 shares o: stoc o: petitioers ha4alrea4" auto*aticall" reverte4 to the 4e:e4at# a4 theistall*ets pai4 b" the* ha4 alrea4" bee :or:eite4.

    R&C absolve4 the 4e:e4at :ro* the co*plaita4 4eclare4 cacele4 =:or:eite4@ i :avor o: the4e:e4at the shares o: stoc i uestio. 6t hel4 that theresolutio o: Au'ust 1# 1/37# 9as ull a4 voi4# citi'-elasco vs. Poi,at =37 Phil.# )$2@ that Ga corporatio haso le'al capacit" to release a ori'ial subscriber to itscapital stoc :ro* the obli'atio to pa" :or sharesL a4a" a'ree*et to this e::ect is ivali4GCA *o4i:ie4 o: the R&C 4ecisio. 6t hel4> that part o: the

    Du4'*et 4is*issi' plaiti::Ks co*plait is a::ir*e4# butthat part thereo: 4eclari' their subscriptio cacele4 isreverse4. e:e4at is 4irecte4 to 'rat plaiti::s 3$4a"s a:ter :ial Du4'*et 9ithi 9hich to pa" the arrearso their subscriptio.

    Petitioers isist that the" have the ri'ht torecover the a*outs it pai4# 9hile the respo4et a4cross

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    17/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    ALE+ G% LEE$ "% HON% SAL"ADOR P% DE GUAN$R%

    G%R% N,% 90926 ./ 6$ 1990

    !ACTS*O ove*ber )# 1/)3# petitioer Alex 0. ee

    purchase4 :ro* respo4et Motor Cars throu'h its:reelace a'et# oe =1@ uit &o"ota Corolla i:tbac#

    1/)3 *o4el# 9ith the uote4 price o: P1%/#7$$.$$ plus*iscellaeous expeses o: P1$#$33.$$. O the sa*e4ate# petitioer ee as custo*er# si'e4 the vehiclesales or4er. &he 4eliver" o: the subDect vehicle 9as

    9ithi the *oth o: ove*ber# 1/)3.

    6 vie9 o: such or4er# petitioer ee 4eposite4the a*out o: P1#$$$.$$ o ove*ber 1$# 1/)3 asreuire4 i the a:oresai4 price uotatio. &hereupo# oece*ber 15# 1/)3# petitioerKs cousel# Att". oroteoA. a4al# 9rote Mr. icolas O. CarraceDa# !r.# Executive-ice

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    18/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    G%R% N,% 115129% !.' 12$ 1997

    !ACTS*

    &he petitioers 9i:e 9as su::eri' :ro* a4ebilitati' ail*et a4 9ith :ore9ari' o: heri*pe4i' 4eath# she expresse4 her 9ish to be lai4 to

    rest be:ore Christ*as 4a" to spare her :a*il" o: the lo'vi'ils as it 9as al*ost Christ*as. A:ter his 9i:e passe4a9a"# petitioer bou'ht *aterials :ro* herei privaterespo4ets :or the costructio o: her iche. Privaterespo4ets ho9ever :aile4 to 4eliver o a'ree4 ti*ea4 4ate 4espite repeate4 :ollo9

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    19/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    EC6 etere4 ito a cotract 9ith AFASA tou4ertae a costructio o: a tuel :ro* 6po a* to0icti iclu4i' all *aterials# euip*et a4 labor :or thesai4 costructio :or )$$ 4a"s. &he proDect ivolve4 2phases. &he :irst ivolves tuel 9ors a4 the seco4cosists o: out9ors at both e4s o: the tuel.

    As soo as EC6 :iishe4 the tuel 9ors i0icti# it tras:erre4 all its euip*ets to 6po a* to :iishthe seco4 phase o: the proDect.

    &he recor4 sho9s that o ove*ber %#1/(7#t"phoo Fel*i' hit Cetral u,o# passi' throu'h4e:e4ats =PC@ A'at 8"4ro

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    20/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    Exe*plar" a*a'es

    o. As to the uestio o: exe*plar" 4a*a'es#9e sustai the appellate court i eli*iati' the sa*esice it :ou4 that there 9as o ba4 :aith o the part o:PC a4 that either ca the latters e'li'ece becosi4ere4 'ross. 6 ee 8ua io' Electrical

    Euip*et Corp. v. Re"es# =1%5 SCRA 713# 71/@ 9erule4>

    either *a" private respo4et recoverexe*plar" 4a*a'es sice he is ot etitle4 to *oralor co*pesator" 4a*a'es# a4 a'ai because thepetitioer is ot sho9 to have acte4 i a 9ato#:rau4ulet# recless or oppressive *aer =Art. 223%#Civil Co4eL Butu v. Maila Electric Co.# 2 SCRA 377Lracisco v. +over*et Service 6surace S"ste*#7 SCRA 577L +utierre, v. -ille'as# ) SCRA 527L Airrace v. Carrascoso# 1) SCRA 155L Pa Paci:ic=Phil.@ v. Phil. A4vertisi' Corp.# 23 SCRA /77LMarcha v. Me4o,a# 2% SCRA )))@.

    AADO PICART "S% !RAN# SITH$ R%$G%R% N,% L-12219 ' 15$ 1918

    !ACTS*

    Plaiti:: A*a4o Picart 9as ri4i' o his po" othe Carlata 0ri4'e i Sa era4o# a io 9he the

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 20

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    21/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    4e:e4at# ri4i' o his car# approache4. e:e4atble9 his hor to 'ive 9ari'. Plaiti:: *ove4 the horseto the ri'ht istea4 o: *ovi' to the le:t# reasoi' thathe ha4 o su::iciet ti*e to *ove to the ri'ht 4irectio.e:e4at cotiue4 to approach# a4 9he he ha4'otte uite ear# he uicl" ture4 to the le:t. &he horse

    9as :ri'htee4 that it ture4 his bo4" across the bri4'e.8is li*b 9as broe a4 the ri4er 9as thro9 o:: a4 'ot

    iDure4. &he horse 4ie4. A actio :or 4a*a'es 9as :ile4a'aist the 4e:e4at.

    ISSUE*

    Fhether or ot the 4e:e4at i *aeuveri'his car i the *aer above 4escribe4 9as 'uilt" o:e'li'ece such as 'ives rise to a civil obli'atio torepair the 4a*a'e 4oe

    HELD*

    As the 4e:e4at starte4 across the bri4'e# heha4 the ri'ht to assu*e that the horse a4 ri4er 9oul4pass over to the proper si4eL but as he *ove4 to9ar4the ceter o: the bri4'e it 9as 4e*ostrate4 to his e"esthat this 9oul4 ot be 4oeL a4 he *ust i a *o*ethave perceive4 that it 9as too late :or the horse to cross

    9ith sa:et" i :rot o: the *ovi' vehicle. 6 the ature o:thi's this cha'e o: situatio occurre4 9hile theauto*obile 9as "et so*e 4istace a9a"L a4 :ro* this*o*et it 9as o lo'er 9ithi the po9er o: the plaiti::to escape bei' ru 4o9 b" 'oi' to a place o: 'reatersa:et". &he cotrol o: the situatio ha4 the passe4etirel" to the 4e:e4at.

    &he test b" 9hich to 4eter*ie the existece o:e'li'ece i a particular case *a" be state4 as :ollo9s>i4 the 4e:e4at i 4oi' the alle'e4 e'li'et act usethat reasoable care a4 cautio 9hich a or4iaril"pru4et perso 9oul4 have use4 i the sa*e situatio6: ot# the he is 'uilt" o: e'li'ece. Co4uct is sai4 tobe e'li'et 9he a pru4et *a i the positio o: thetort:easor 9oul4 have :oresee that a e::ect har*:ul toaother 9as su::icietl" probable to 9arrat his:ore'oi' the co4uct or 'uar4i' a'aist itscoseueces.

    6t 'oes 9ithout sa"i' that the plaiti:: hi*sel:9as ot :ree :ro* :ault# :or he 9as 'uilt" o: atece4ete'li'ece i plati' hi*sel: o the 9ro' si4e o: theroa4. 0ut as 9e have alrea4" state4# the 4e:e4at 9asalso e'li'etL a4 i such case the proble* al9a"s isto 4iscover 9hich a'et is i**e4iatel" a4 4irectl"resposible. 6t 9ill be ote4 that the e'li'et acts o: thet9o parties 9ere ot cote*poraeous# sice the

    e'li'ece o: the 4e:e4at succee4e4 the e'li'eceo: the plaiti:: b" a appreciable iterval. 4er thesecircu*staces the la9 is that the perso 9ho has thelast :air chace to avoi4 the i*pe4i' har* a4 :ails to4o so is char'eable 9ith the coseueces# 9ithoure:erece to the prior e'li'ece o: the other part".

    THE CONSOLIDATED BAN# '() TRUSTCORPORATION "S% CA '() L%C% DIA & COPANY

    G%R% N,% 138569% S 11$ 2003

    !ACTS*

    Private respo4et .C. ia, istructe4 hise*plo"ee# Calapre# to 4eposit i his savi's accout ipetitioer ba. Calapre le:t the passboo o: .C. ia, to

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 21

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    22/230

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    23/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    O Septe*ber 1//1# S&CO Pte. t4 Si'aporeshippe4 3%5 hot rolle4 steel sheets i coil :ro* the porto: Russia. &he car'oes 9hich 9ere to be 4ischar'e4 iMaila 9ere isure4 9ith 64ustrial 6surace Co*pa".&he cosi'ee ittle +iat Steel Pipe e'a'e4 theservices o: petitioer Sch*i4t &rasport to secure thereuisite clearaces a4 4eliver the car'oes to Caita

    Ri,al.

    Respo4et &rasport -eture o the otherha4 9as e'a'e4 b" Sch*i4t to to9 the bar'ecotaii' the car'oes to the ship"ar4. &he arrastreoperator 9as able to uloa4 ol" 37 out o: the 3%5 coils4ue to icle*et 9eather co4itios. &he bar'ecotaii' the 37 coils pitche4 a4 rolle4 9ith the 9avesa4 evetuall" capsi,e4. Cosi'ee ittle +iat the:ile4 a isurace clai* a'aist 64ustrial 6surace

    9hich i tur :ile4 a co*plait a'aist Sch*i4t torecover the a*out it pai4 to ittle +iat.

    &he &rial Court hol4s Sch*i4t &rasport a4&rasport -eture soli4aril" liable :or the a*out. &he4ecisio 9as a::ir*e4 b" the CA a4 the 4e:ese o::ortuitous evet 9as 4iscre4ite4. 8ece# Sch*i4t&rasport :ile4 this petitio be:ore the SC a'aist &-6#64ustrial 6surace a4 the 0lac Sea.

    ISSUE*

    Fhether or ot the loss o: the car'oes 9as 4ueto a :ortuitous evet# hece# petitioers shoul4 ot behel4 liable

    HELD*

    O. &he Supre*e Court hel4 that 9he a:ortuitous evet occurs# Article 117% o: the Civil Co4eabsolves a" part" :ro* a" a4 all liabilit" arisi'there:ro*>

    AR&. 117%. Except i cases expressl" speci:ie4b" the la9# or 9he it is other9ise 4eclare4 b"stipulatio# or 9he the ature o: the obli'atio reuiresthe assu*ptio o: ris# o perso shall be resposible

    :or those evets 9hich coul4 ot be :oresee# or 9hichthou'h :oresee# 9ere ievitable.

    6 or4er# to be cosi4ere4 a :ortuitous evet#ho9ever# =1@ the cause o: the u:oresee a4uexpecte4 occurrece# or the :ailure o: the 4ebtor toco*pl" 9ith his

    obli'atio# *ust be i4epe4et o: hu*a 9illL =2@ i*ust be i*possible to :oresee the evet 9hich costitutethe caso :ortuito# or i: it ca be :oresee it *ust bei*possible to avoi4L =3@ the occurrece *ust be such asto re4er it i*possible :or the 4ebtor to :ul:ill hisobli'atio i a" *aerL a4 =%@ the obli'or *ust be:ree :ro* a" participatio i the a''ravatio o: theiDur" resulti' to the cre4itor.

    &he priciple e*bo4ie4 i the act o: +o44octrie strictl" reuires that the act *ust be occasioe4solel" b" the violece o: ature. 8u*a itervetio is tobe exclu4e4 :ro* creati' or eteri' ito the cause o:the *ischie:. Fhe the e::ect is :ou4 to be i part theresult o: the participatio o: *a# 9hether 4ue to hisactive itervetio or e'lect or :ailure to act# the 9holeoccurrece is the hu*ai,e4 a4 re*ove4 :ro* therules applicable to the acts o: +o4.

    &he appellate court# i a::ir*i' the :i4i' o:the trial court that hu*a itervetio i the :or* o

    cotributor" e'li'ece b" all the 4e:e4ats resulte4 tothe loss o: the car'oes# hel4 that uloa4i' outsi4e thebrea9ater# istea4 o: isi4e the brea9ater# 9hile astor* si'al 9as up costitutes e'li'ece. 6t thuscoclu4e4 that the proxi*ate cause o: the loss 9as0lac Seas e'li'ece i 4eci4i' to uloa4 thecar'oes at a usa:e place a4 9hile a t"phoo 9asapproachi'. &he loss thus :alls outsi4e the Gact o: +o44octrie.G

    REAL "S% BELO'(.' 26$ 2007

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 23

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    24/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    !ACTS*

    Petitioer -ir'iia Real a4 respo4etSesie4o 0elo both o9e4 a4 operate4 a :ast:oo4stall i the :oo4 court ceter o: PF. A :ire broe out atthe petitioers stall 9hich sprea4 a4 'utte4 other stallsi the area iclu4i' that o: the respo4ets.Respo4et 4e*a4e4 pa"*et :ro* the petitioer but

    the latter re:use4. 8ece# a case :or 4a*a'es 9as :ile4be:ore the M&C.

    Respo4et alle'e4 that petitioer :aile4 toexercise 4ue 4ili'ece i the upeep a4 *aiteaceo: her cooi' euip*ets# as 9ell as the selectio a4supervisio o: her e*plo"eesL that petitioerKse'li'ece 9as the proxi*ate cause o: the :ire that'utte4 the :ast:oo4 stalls. &he petitioer o the otherha4 4eie4 liabilit" o the 'rou4s that the :ire 9as a:ortuitous evet a4 that she exercise4 4ue 4ili'ece ithe selectio a4 supervisio o: her e*plo"ees. M&C

    re4ere4 Du4'*et i :avour o: respo4et 0elo a4 9asa::ir*e4 b" the R&C a4 CA upo appeal.

    ISSUE*

    Fhether or ot the :ire that broe out :ro*petitioers stall is a :ortuitous evet

    HELD*

    O. !urispru4ece 4e:ies the ele*ets o: aG:ortuitous evetG as :ollo9s> =a@ the cause o: theu:oresee a4 uexpecte4 occurrece *ust bei4epe4et o: hu*a 9illL =b@ it *ust be i*possible to:oresee the evet 9hich costitutes the caso :ortuito# ori: it ca be :oresee# it *ust be i*possible to avoi4L =c@the occurrece *ust be such as to re4er it i*possible:or the 4ebtor to :ul:ill his obli'atio i a or*al *aerLa4 =4@ the obli'or *ust be :ree :ro* a" participatio ithe a''ravatio o: the iDur" resulti' to the cre4itor.

    Article 117% o: the Civil Co4e provi4es that operso shall be resposible :or a :ortuitous evet 9hichcoul4 ot be :oresee# or 9hich# thou'h :oresee# 9asievitable. 6 other 9or4s# there *ust be a etireexclusio o: hu*a a'ec" :ro* the cause o: iDur" orloss.

    6t is establishe4 b" evi4ece that the :ireori'iate4 :ro* leai' :u*es :ro* the P+ stove a4

    ta istalle4 at petitioerKs :ast:oo4 stall a4 hee*plo"ees :aile4 to prevet the :ire :ro* sprea4i' a44estro"i' the other :ast:oo4 stalls# iclu4i'respo4etKs :ast:oo4 stall. Such circu*staces 4o otsupport petitioerKs theor" o: :ortuitous evet.

    PHILIPPINE COUNICATIONS "S% GLOBE' 25$ 2004

    !ACTS*

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 24

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    25/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    O Ma" 7# 1//1 Philco*sat +lobe etere4ito a a'ree*et 9hereb" Philco*sat obli'e4 itsel: toestablish# operate provi4e a 60S sta4ar4 0 earthstatio :or the exclusive use o: S 4e:eseco**uicatios A'ec" =SCA@. &he ter* 9as :or ($*oths or 5 "rs 6 tur# +lobe pro*ise4 to pa"Philco*sat *othl" retals.

    At the executio o: the a'ree*et# both partiese9 that *ilitar" 0ases A'ree*et 9as to expire i1//1. Subseuetl"# Philco*sat istalle4 the earthstatio SCA *a4e use o: the sa*e.

    &he seate passe4 a resolutio expressi' its4ecisio ot to cocur i the rati:icatio o: the treat" o::rie4ship. So the RP

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    26/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    "S% COURT O! APPEALS '() YSAEL C% !ERRERO=, 11$ 1995

    !ACTS*

    S0&C a4 Mahit cotracte4 errer to costructi 2$$ 4a"s a buil4i' i cosi4eratio o: 1#7($#$$$.$$.

    errer 9as able to :iish the costructio o: the buil4i'9ithi the prescribe4 ti*e# but icurre4 a44itioalexpeses o: about 3$$#$$$.$$ o top o: the ori'ial cost4ue to 4rastic icreases i costructio *aterials. errer*a4e ti*el" 4e*a4s :or pa"*et o: the icrease4 cost#a4 S0&C a4 a represetative o: a architectural :ir*cosulte4 b" S0&C veri:ie4 errers clai*s :or a44itioalcost. A reco**e4atio 9as the *a4e to settle theclai* :or 2$$#$$$.$$ but S0&C 4i4 ot pa" the a*out#a4 istea4 4eie4 a" liabilit" :or the a44itioal cost.errer the :ile4 a clai* :or breach o: cotract 9ith4a*a'es i the R&C# 9hich rule4 i :avor o: errer#Court o: Appeals a::ir*e4 the 4ecisio.

    ISSUE*

    Fhether or ot S0&C shoul4 be hel4 liable :orthe icrease i the cost o: costructio 4ue to the 4rasticicrease i the cost o: *aterials

    HELD*

    BES. 4er Art 11)2 o: the CC# a co4itioalobli'atio shall be voi4 i: its :ul:ill*et 4epe4s upo thesole 9ill o: the 4ebtor. 4er Art 6V o: the buil4i'cotract it allo9s :or the a4Dust*et o: the cotract priceupo *utual a'ree*et o: the parties.

    6t is the absece o: this *utual a'ree*et thatthe ba is usi' to support its cotetio that it is otliable :or the icrease4 cost# a4 i e::ect this is aobli'atio 4epe4et o S0&Cs sole 9ill# sice itscoset is reuire4 :or the recover" o: the icrease4 cost

    to be allo9e4.

    &his i e::ect allo9s S0&C to acuire thecostructe4 buil4i' at a price that is :ar belo9 its actualcostructio cost# a4 this costitutes uDust erich*et:or S0&C at the expese o: errer. &his is ot allo9e4 b"la9 b" virtue o: Art 22 o: CC.

    F8EREORE# 9ith the above *o4i:icatio irespect o: the a*out o: attore"Ks :ees# the appeale44ecisio o: the Court o: Appeals i CA +.R. C- o%$%5$ is A6RME.

    ACTAN CEBU INT@L AIRPORT "S% TUDTUDN,> 14$ 2008

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 2

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    27/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    !ACTS*Pre4ecessors

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    28/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    !ACTS*8a9aiia

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    29/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    CORTES % COURT O! APPEALS./ 12$ 2006

    !ACTS*

    or the purchase price o: 3.7M# -illa Espera,aevelop*et Corporatio =ve4ee@ a4 Atoio Cortes=ve4or@ etere4 ito a cotract o: sale over the lotslocate4 at 0aclara# ParaNaue# Metro Maila. &heCorporatio a4vace4 to Cortes the total su* o:P1#213#$$$.$$. 6 Septe*ber 1/)3# the parties execute4a 4ee4 o: absolute sale o the :ollo9i' ter*s>&he Corporatio shall a4vace 2.2 M as 4o9pa"*et#a4 Cortes shall lie9ise 4eliver the &C& :or the 3 lots.&he balace o: 1.5M shall be pa"able 9ithi a "ear :ro*the 4ate o: the executio.

    &he Corporatio :ile4 the istat case :orspeci:ic per:or*ace seei' to co*pel Cortes to 4eliverthe &C&s a4 the ori'ial cop" o: the ee4 o: AbsoluteSale. Accor4i' to the Corporatio# 4espite its rea4iessa4 abilit" to pa" the purchase price# Cortes re:use44eliver" o: the sou'ht 4ocu*ets. 6t pra"e4 :or4a*a'es# attore"s :ees a4 liti'atio expeses. Cortesclai*e4 that the o9ers 4uplicate cop" o: the three&C&s 9ere surre4ere4 to the Corporatio a4 it is thelatter 9hich re:use4 to pa" i :ull the a'ree4 4o9pa"*et.

    R&C re4ere4 a 4ecisio resci4i' the salea4 4irecte4 Cortes to retur to the Corporatio thea*out o: P1#213#$$$.$$# plus iterest. CA reverse4 the

    4ecisio a4 4irecte4 Cortes to execute a ee4 o:Absolute Sale cove"i' the properties a4 to 4eliverthe sa*e to the Corporatio to'ether 9ith the &C&s#si*ultaeous 9ith the Corporatios pa"*et o: thebalace o: the purchase price o: P2#%)7#$$$.$$.

    ISSUES*Fhether or ot Cortes 4elivere4 the &C&s a4

    the ori'ial ee4 to the CorporatioO.

    FO there is 4ela" i the per:or*ace o: theparties obli'atio that 9oul4 Dusti:" the rescissio o: thecotract o: sale &8ERE 6S EAB 6 0O&8 PAR&6ES=co*pesatio *orae@

    HELD*

    Cortes avers that he 4elivere4 the &C&sthrou'h the broers so. 8e :urther avers that thebroers so 4elivere4 it to the broer# 9ho i tur4elivere4 the* to the Corporatio.

    Marcosa Sache,s urebutte4 testi*o" is thatshe 4i4 ot receive the &C&s. She also 4eie4

    o9le4'e o: 4eliver" thereo: to her so# Ma".

    Fhat :urther stre'thee4 the :i4i's o: theCourt o: Appeals that Cortes 4i4 ot surre4er thesubDect 4ocu*ets 9as the o::er o: Cortes cousel athe pre

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    30/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    S 12$ 2003

    !ACTS*

    &he case at ha4 revolves arou4 a 4ispute4parcel o: co**ercial la4 ori'iall" co

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    31/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    SPOUSES RAYOS "S% COURT O! APPEALS./ 14$ 2004

    !ACTS*O 1/)5# Spouses Ra"os secure4 a short ter*

    loa :ro* the Philippie Savi's 0a pa"able 9ithi a

    perio4 o: oe "ear i uarterl" istal*ets. 6t 9asevi4ece4 b" a pro*issor" ote a4 the spousesexecute4 a REM over their propert" locate4 i asPias.

    O the sa*e "ear the spouses execute4 a ee4o: Absolute Sale 9ith Assu*ptio o: Mort'a'e over thepropert" 9ith spouses Mira4a. 8o9ever# the spousesexecute4 aother 4ocu*et# a cotract to sell the sai4propert" i :avour o: the respo4ets. Respo4etRo'elio Mira4a the :ile4 a applicatio 9ith PS0 tosecure approval o: his assu*ptio o: the petitioersobli'atio o the loa but such 9as 4isapprove4.

    evertheless# Ro'elio pai4 the :irst a4 seco4 uarterl"istal*et :or the accout o: petitioers.

    Petitoer the receive4 a letter :ro* the bare*i4i' hi* o: the last uarterl" istal*et a4 :eari'that the respo4ets 9ill ot be able to pa" theistal*et# he pai4 the a*out 4ue. 8e the a4vise4 theba ot to tur over the 4uplicate title to respo4ets.

    Respo4ets the :ile4 a case a'aistpetitioers a4 the ba clai*i' that the bacospire4 9ith spouses Ra"os i preveti' hi* :ro*pa"i' the last istal*et a4 i re:usi' to tur over the4uplicate title thereb" preveti' the tras:er o: thepropert" to his a*e.

    ISSUE*Fhether or ot petitioer ha4 uilaterall"

    cacelle4 the cotract 9he he pai4 the last uarterl"istal*et

    HELD*

    O.6t bears stressi' that the petitioers a4 therespo4ets execute4 t9o iterrelate4 cotracts# vi,> the

    ee4 o: Sale 9ith Assu*ptio o: Mort'a'e 4ate4ece*ber 2(# 1/)5# a4 the Cotract to Sell 4ate4!auar" 2/# 1/)(. &o 4eter*ie the itetio o: theparties# the t9o cotracts *ust be rea4 a4 iterprete4to'ether. 4er the t9o cotracts# the petitioers bou4a4 obli'e4 the*selves to execute a 4ee4 o: absolutesale over the propert" a4 tras:er title thereo to therespo4ets a:ter the pa"*et o: the :ull purchase priceo: the propert"# iclusive o: the uarterl" istall*ets4ue o the petitioersK loa 9ith the PS0>

    3. &hat upo :ull pa"*et o: the cosi4eratiohereo:# the SEER shall execute a ee4 oAbsolute Sale i :avor o: the 0BER that thepa"*et o: capital 'ais tax shall be :or theaccout o: the SEER a4 that 4ocu*etar"sta*ps# tras:er tax# re'istratio expeses :othe tras:er o: title iclu4i' the otari,atio a4preparatio o: this Cotract a4 subseue

    4ocu*ets i: a" are to be execute4# real estatetaxes :ro* !auar" 1# 1/)( a4 othe*iscellaeous expeses shall be :or the accouo: the 0BERL the SEER hereb" represetsthat all associatio 4ues has bee pai4 but thasubseuet to the executio o: this Cotract thepa"*et o: the sa*e shall 4evolve upo the0BER.

    Costrui' the cotracts to'ether# it is evi4ethat the parties execute4 a contract to sell and not acontract of sale. &he petitioers retaie4 o9ership

    9ithout :urther re*e4ies b" the respo4ets util the

    pa"*et o: the purchase price o: the propert" i :ullSuch pa"*et is a positive suspesive co4itio# :ailureo: 9hich is ot reall" a breach# serious or other9ise# buta evet that prevets the obli'atio o: the petitioers tocove" title :ro* arisi'# i accor4ace 9ith Article 11)%o: the Civil Co4e.

    &he o

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    32/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    CORDERO "S% !%S% ANAGEENT DE"ELOPENTO=, 31$ 2006

    !ACTS*

    0ele Cor4ero a4 ( others# herei petitioers#

    etere4 ito a cotract to sell 9ith .S. Maa'e*etevelop*et over 5 parcels o: la4 locate4 i asu'bo#0ata'as. 4er the ter*s o: the cotract# a 4o9pa"*et o: P3.5M a4 the pa"*et o: the re*aii'balace i ( uarterl" istal*ets. 8o9ever# respo4et4e:aulte4 :ro* pa"*et. &hus# a:ter 4e*a4i' therespo4ets to pa" the re*aii' a*out# petitioers:ile4 a co*plait :or rescissio o: the cotract 9ith4a*a'es. Respo4et cote4s that the petitioers

    9ere the :irst oes 9ho violate4 the cotract to sell b"preveti' access to the propert" 4espite the pa"*et o:P2.5M 9orth o: earest *oe" a4 that the petitioersre:use4 to execute the :ial cotract o: price.

    &he R&C rule4 i :avour o: petitioers 9hile theCA rule4 i :avour o: the respo4ets. 6 their MR#petitioers cote4 that the cotract to sell *a" besubDect to rescissio u4er Art. 11/1 o: the CC as itivolves reciprocal obli'atios.

    ISSUE*Fhether or ot a cotract to sell *a" be subDect

    to rescissio u4er Art. 11/1

    HELD*

    O. 4er a cotract to sell# the seller retaistitle to the thi' to be sol4 util the purchaser :ull" pa"sthe a'ree4 purchase price. &he :ull pa"*et is a positivesuspesive co4itio# the o

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    33/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    !ACTS*

    ro* the or4er o: the Court o: irst 6stace o:Maila =i Civil Case o. 31%$/@ 4is*issi' hisco*plait# o the 'rou4 o: prescriptio# plaiti::e4erico Calero iterpose4 this appeal 4irectl" to thisCourt o uestios purel" o: la9.

    O !ul" 1)#1/57# 4e:e4at ree9e4 their*otio to 4is*iss# o the 'rou4s that =1@ the a*e4e4co*plait states o cause o: actio =2@ the plaiti::Kscause o: actio# i: a"# is barre4 b" the Statute o:i*itatios =Sec. 1eT# Rule )# Rule o: Court@# a4 =3@ theplaiti::Ks ori'ial co*plait bei' 9ithout cause o:actio# it caot be a*e4e4 a4Qor cure4 b" sai4a*e4e4 co*plait 9hich cha'es plaiti::Ks theor" o:the case. 6 coectio 9ith the seco4 'rou4*etioe4# 4e:e4ats state4>

    Plaiti::Ks ri'ht o: actio accrue4 i the "ear 1/379he the :irst o: plaiti::s alle'e4 various o::ersto 4e:e4ats to sell the propert" at price o::ere4b" bu"ers 9as re:use4 b" 4e:e4ats =Pars. 13a4 1% o: Co*plait@. 6t is patet# there:ore# thatis# te =1$@ "ears :ro* the "ear 1/37.Cosi4eri' that plaiti::Ks co*plait 9as :ile4 oece*ber 21# 1/5(# plaiti::Ks cause o: actio i:a"# is obviousl" ue:orceable a4 barre4 b"the Statue o: i*itatios.

    &o this *otio# plaiti:: :ile4 his oppositio oAu'ust 2# 1/57# to 9hich 4e:e4ats :ile4 a reDoi4er oAu'ust )# 1/57. &o this reDoi4er# plaiti:: :ile4 a couter 1@ 9he there is a stipulatio to the cotrar"# 2@

    9he the obli'or is sue4 :or re:usal to pa" the a'ree4pealt"# a4 3@ 9he the obli'or is 'uilt" o: :rau4. 6these cases# the purpose o: the pealt" is obviousl" topuish the obli'or :or the breach. 8ece# the obli'ee carecover :ro* the :or*er ot ol" the pealt"# but alsoother 4a*a'es resulti' :ro* the o:ul:ill*et o: thepricipal obli'atio.

    6 the preset case# the :irst exceptio appliesbecause Article VV =c@ provi4es that# asi4e :ro* thepa"*et o: the retals correspo4i' to the re*aii'ter* o: the lease# the lessee shall also be liable :or a"a4 all 4a*a'es# actual or coseuetial# resulti' :ro*such 4e:ault a4 ter*iatio o: this cotract.I 8avi'etere4 ito the Cotract volutaril" a4 9ith :ullo9le4'e o: its provisios# PA+COR *ust be hel4bou4 to its obli'atios. 6t caot eva4e :urther liabilit":or liui4ate4 4a*a'es.

    6 this case# PA+CORs breach 9as occasioe4b" evets that# althou'h ot :ortuitous i la9# 9ere i :actreal a4 pressi'. 9e :i4 that PA+COR co4ucte4 aseries o: e'otiatios a4 cosultatios be:ore eteri'ito the Cotract. 6t 4i4 so ot ol" 9ith the PPC# but

    also 9ith local 'over*et o::icials# 9ho assure4 it thatthe proble*s 9ere sur*outable. ie9ise# PA+CORtoo pais to cotes t the or4iaces be:ore the courts#

    9hich coseuetl" 4eclare4 the* ucostitutioal. Otop o: these 4evelop*ets# the 'a*i' corporatio 9asa4vise4 b" the O::ice o: the Presi4et to stop the 'a*esi Ca'a"a 4e Oro Cit"# pro*pti' the :or*er to ceaseoperatios prior to Septe*ber 1//3.

    ASIATRUST DE"ELOPENT CONCEPTS

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 40

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    41/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    TRADING

    !ACTS*

    6 March 1//(# respo4et Cocepts &ra4i'Corporatio obtaie4 :ro* petitioer Asiatrust

    evelop*et Corporatio a cre4it acco**o4atio i thea*out o: P2#$$$#$$$ covere4 b" a loa a'ree*et a4secure4 b" real a4 chattel *ort'a'es.

    &he a*out 9as 4ra9 :ro* a 64ustrial+uaratee oa u4 =6+@ accout opee4 b" thepetitioer i :avor o: the respo4et. O March %# 1/)(#the respo4et execute4 Pro*issor" ote i :avor o: thepetitioer. 4er the pro*issor" ote# the pricipala*out o: P2#$$$#$$$ 9oul4 be char'e4 a iterest o:23J per au*# iclusive o: 1J service :ee. Attache4 toa4 *a4e part o: the pro*issor" ote 9as the sche4uleo: a*orti,atio a'ree4 upo b" the parties. As set :orth ithe sche4ule# the pa"*et o: the loa 9as to be

    a*orti,e4 uarterl" over a perio4 o: te "ears 9ith a t9o

    ... the etire a*out outsta4i' u4er thisote shall i**e4iatel"# 9ithout ee4 :or a" otice#4e*a4# preset*et# protest# or o: a" other act or4ee4# the ri'ht to all o: 9hich is hereb" 9aive4 b" theu4ersi'e4> =i@ beco*e 4ue# pa"able a4 4e:aulte4L=ii@ be subDect to a pealt" euivalet to thirt"

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    42/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    BES. 0" eteri' ito a *e*ora4u* o:a'ree*et# the ba 9aive4 the 4e*a4abilit" o: theetire loa. 0" such 9aiver# Cocept &ra4i' has otbee re4ere4 i 4e:ault# a4 also# the pealt" 9as

    9aive4 u4er the MOA.

    4er the sche4ule o: a*orti,atio cotaie4 ithe pro*issor" ote# the respo4et obli'e4 to pa" the

    pricipal obli'atio i uarterl" a*orti,atios over aperio4 o: te "ears a4 that i case o: 4e:ault# the etirea*out shall be 4ue a4 4e*a4able i its etiret". Othe other ha4# u4er the MOA# a e9 *o4e o: pa"*et

    9as a'ree4 upo# i.e., the pa"*et b" the respo4eto: the iitial a*out o: P15/#25/.1% a4 subseuetpa"*ets o: P15$#$$$ ever" *oth util :ull pa"*et o:the loa obli'atio. &he MOA# i e::ect# re4ere4 theloa o lo'er 4ue a4 4e*a4able i its etiret" at theti*e o: its executio# precisel" because it allo9e4 therespo4et u4er the e9 sche4ule o: pa"*ets to pa"the sa*e b" *othl" istall*ets. 6t bears stressi' thatthe MOA provi4e4 that the *o4e o: pa"*et arose out

    o: the 0A;s liberalit".I &o allo9 the petitioer to collectpealt" char'es as i: the respo4et 9ere i 4e:ault#ot9ithsta4i' the existece o: a e9 pa"*etsche4ule# 9oul4 be icosistet 9ith the a:oresai4a'ree*et.

    6t *ust be stresse4# ho9ever# that the :ore'oi'shoul4 ot be costrue4 as to *ea that the respo4etcoul4 o lo'er be hel4 i 4e:ault a4 that the petitioerco*pletel" 9aive4 collectio o: pealt" char'es i caseo: 4e:ault. o

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    43/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    !ACTS*

    Petitioers# the spouses e9to a4 Salvacio!iso# etere4 ito a Cotract to Sell 9ith privaterespo4et# Robert O. Phillips Sos# 6c.# 9hereb" thelatter a'ree4 to sell to the :or*er a lot at the -ictoria

    -alle" Sub4ivisio i Atipolo# Ri,al :or P55#$$$.$$# 9ithiterest at )#1/(5 per au*# pa"able o a istall*etbasis.

    Petitioers pai4 private respo4ets a 4o9pa"*et o: P11#$$$.$$ o October 2$# 1/(1 a4 :ro*October 27# 1/(1L to Ma" )# 1/(5 a *othl" istall*eto: P533.)5. ue to the :ailure o: petitioers to buil4 ahouse as provi4e4 i the cotract# the stipulate4 pealt"o: P5.$$ per suare *eter 9as i*pose4 to the e::ect thatthe *othl" a*orti,atio 9as icrease4 to P7$7.2%.

    O !auar" 1# 1/((# ebruar" 1# 1/(( a4March 1# 1/((# petitioers :aile4 to pa" the *othl"

    istall*ets 4ue o sai4 4ates althou'h petitioerssubseuetl" pai4 the a*outs 4ue a4 these 9ereaccepte4 b" private respo4et.

    Petitioers :aile4 to pa" :ro* October 1/(( to!auar" 1/(7. O !auar" 11# 1/(7# private respo4etset a letter to petitioers calli' their attetio to the :actthat their accout 9as :our *oths over4ue. &his letter

    9as :ollo9e4 up b" aother letter 9here privaterespo4et re*i4e4 petitioer o: the auto*aticrescissio clause o: the cotract. Petitioers evetuall"pai4 o March 1# 1/(7.

    Petitioers a'ai :aile4 to pa" the *othl"istall*ets 4ue .&hus# private respo4et reture4petitioersK chec a4 i:or*e4 the* that the cotract

    9as cacelle4 9he o April 1# 1/(7 petitioers :aile4 topa" the *othl" istall*et 4ue# thereb" *ai' theiraccout 4eliuet :or three *oths.

    O April 1/# 1/(7# petitioers te4ere4 pa"*et:or all the istall*ets alrea4" 4ue but the te4er 9asre:use4. Petitioers coutere4 b" :ili' a co*plait :orspeci:ic per:or*ace 9ith the Court o: irst 6stace o:Ri,al o Ma" %# 1/(7 a4 cosi'i' the *othl"istall*ets 4ue 9ith the court.

    &he &C re4ere4 Du4'*et i :avor o: privaterespo4et# 4is*issi' the co*plait a4 4eclari' thecotract cacelle4 a4 all pa"*ets alrea4" *a4e b"petitioer :rachise. or4eri' petitioers to pa" P1#$$$.$$as a4 :or attore"Ks :eesL a4 4eclari' the cosi'atioa4 te4er o: pa"*et *a4e b" petitioers as ota*outi' to pa"*et o: the correspo4i' *othl"istall*ets.

    ot satis:ie4 9ith the 4ecisio o: the trial court# petitioersappeale4 to the Court o: Appeals. A'reei' 9ith the:i4i's a4 coclusios o: the trial court# the Court o:Appeals o ove*ber %# 1/7( a::ir*e4 the :or*erKs4ecisio.

    ISSUE*Fhether or ot rescissio o: the cotract a4 the

    :or:eiture o: the pa"*ets alrea4" *a4e b" petitioer isvali4

    HELD*

    BES. RESC6SS6O O CO&RAC& FAS-A6.

    &here is o 4e"i' that i the istat case the

    resolutio or rescissio o: the Cotract to Sell 9as vali4either ca it be sai4 that the cacellatio o: the cotrac9as ie::ective :or :ailure o: private respo4ets to 'ivepetitioers otice thereo: as petitioers 9ere i:or*e4cacelle4 private respo4et that the cotract 9ascacelle4 i the letter 4ate4 April (# 1/(7 =Exh. GG@. AsR.A. o. (5)5(# 9as ot "et e::ective# the otice ocacellatio ee4 ot be b" otarial act# privaterespo4etKs letter bei' su::iciet co*pliace 9ith thele'al reuire*et.

    &he :acts o: K:ee istat case shoul4 be4isti'uishe4 :ro* those i the Palay Inc. case# assuch 4istictio 9ill explai 9h" the Court i sai4 caseivali4ate4 the resolutio o: the cotract. 6 sai4 casethe sub4ivisio 4eveloper# 9ithout i:or*i' the bu"er othe cacellatio o: the cotract# resol4 the lot to aotherperso. &he lot bu"er i sai4 case 9as ol" i:or*e4 othe resolutio o: the cotract so*e six "ears later a:terthe 4eveloper# reDecte4 his reuest :or authorit" to assi'his ri'hts u4er the cotract. Such a situatio 4oes oobtai illess> the istat case. 6 :act# petitioers 9erei:or*e4 o: the cacellatio o: their cotract i Apri1/(7# 9he private respo4et 9rote the* the lette4ate4 April (# 1/(7 =Exh. GG@# a4 9ithi a *oth the"

    9ere able to :ile a co*plait a'aist Private respo4et.

    Fhile the resolutio o: the cotract a4 the:or:eiture o: the a*outs alrea4" pai4 are vali4 a4bi4i' upo petitioers# the Court is covice4 that the:or:eiture o: the a*out o: P5.$$ althou'h it iclu4es theaccu*ulate4 :ies :or petitioersK :ailure to costruct ahouse as reuire4 b" the cotract# is clearl" iiuitouscosi4eri' that the cotract price is ol" P(#173.15 &he:or:eiture o: :i:t" percet =5$J@ o: the a*out alrea4"pai4# or P3#2)3.75 appears to be a :air settle*et. 6arrivi' at this a*out the Court 'ives 9ei'ht to the :acthat althou'h petitioers have bee 4eliuet i pa"i'

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 43

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    44/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    their a*orti,atios several ti*es to the preDu4ice o:private respo4et# 9ith the cacellatio o: the cotractthe possessio o: the lot revie9.... to private respo4et

    9ho is :ree to resell it to aother part". Also# ha4 R.A. o.(5)5(# bee applicable to the istat case# the sa*eperceta'e o: the a*out alrea4" pai4 9oul4 have bee:or:eite4 &orralba [email protected]

    &he CourtKs 4ecisio to re4uce the a*out:or:eite4 :i4s support i the Civil Co4e. As state4 ipara'raph 3 o: the cotract# i case the cotract iscacelle4# the a*outs alrea4" pai4 shall be :or:eite4 i:avor o: the ve4or as liui4ate4 4a*a'es. &he Co4eprovi4es that liui4ate4 4a*a'es# 9hether ite4e4 asa i4e*it" or a pealt"# shall be euitabl" re4uce4 i:the" are iiuitous or ucoscioable AR&.2227. urther#i obli'atios 9ith a peal clause# the Du4'e shalleuitabl" re4uce the pealt" 9he the pricipal obli'atiohas bee partl" or irre'ularl" co*plie4 9ith b" the 4ebtor

    LO "S% #S ECO-!OROR#

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 44

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    45/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    !ACTS*

    Petitioer o# a buil4i' cotractor# or4ere4sca::ol4i' euip*ets :ro* respo4et ;!S 9orthP5%$#%25.)$. 8e pai4 a 4o9pa"*et i the a*out o:P15$#$$$. &he balace 9as *a4e pa"able i te *othl"

    istal*ets. Respo4et 4elivere4 the sca::ol4i's topetitioer. Petitioer 9as able to pa" the :irst t9o *othl"istal*ets. 8o9ever# his busiess# ho9ever#ecoutere4 :iacial 4i::iculties a4 he 9as uable tosettle his obli'atio 4espite 4e*a4s. Petitioer a4respo4et execute4 a ee4 o: Assi'*et# petitioerassi'i' to respo4et his receivables o: P335#%2(.1%:ro* !o*ero Realt" Corp. 8o9ever# 9he therespo4et trie4 to collect :ro* !o*ero# the latter re:use4to hoor the ee4 o: Assi'*et clai*i' that petitioer

    9as also i4ebte4 to it. Respo4et the 4e*a4e4 :ro*the petitioer the pa"*et o: his obli'atio# but petitioerre:use4 to pa" clai*i' that his obli'atio ha4 beeexti'uishe4 9he the" execute4 the ee4 o:Assi'*et. As a result# respo4et :ile4 a actio :orrecover" o: a su* o: *oe" a'aist the petitioer.

    ISSUE*

    Fhether the ee4 o: Assi'*et exti'uishe4the petitioers obli'atio

    HELD*

    O. A assi'*et o: cre4it is a a'ree*et#9hich is i the ature o: a sale persoal propert"#pro4uce4 the e::ects o: a 4atio i pa"*et 9hich *a"exti'uish the obli'atio. 6 4acio e pa'o# as a special*o4e o: pa"*et# the 4ebtor o::ers aother thi' to thecre4itor 9ho accepts it as euivalet o: pa"*et o: aoutsta4i' 4ebt. 6 or4er that there be a vali4 4atio ipa"*et# the :ollo9i' *ust be preset> =1@ &here *ustbe the per:or*ace o: the prestatio i lieu o: pa"*et#

    9hich ca be a cre4it a'aist thir4 persoL =2@ &here*ust be so*e 4i::erece bet9ee the prestatio 4ue a4that 9hich is 'ive i substitutioL =3@ &here *ust be aa'ree*et bet9ee the cre4itor a4 4ebtor that the

    obli'atio is i**e4iatel" exti'uishe4 b" reaso o: theper:or*ace o: a prestatio 4i::eret :ro* that 4ue.&heu4ertai' reall" partaes i oe sese o: the ature o:sale# that is# the cre4itor is reall" bu"i' the thi' orpropert" o: the 4ebtor# pa"*et :or 9hich is to bechar'e4 a'aist the 4ebtors 4ebt. As such# petitioer# asve4or or assi'or# is bou4 to 9arrat the existece a4le'alit" o: the cre4it at the ti*e o: the sale or assi'*et.Fhe !o*ero clai*e4 that it 9as o lo'er i4ebte4 topetitioer sice the latter also ha4 a upai4 obli'atio toit# it essetiall" *eat that its obli'atio to petitioer has

    bee exti'uishe4 b" co*pesatio. 6 other 9or4srespo4et alle'e4 the o

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    46/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    !ACTS*

    Arro"o Spouses@X# obtaie4 a loa o:P5)$#$$$.$$ :ro* petitioer ba to purchase ($J o: thesubscribe4 capital stoc# a4 thereb" acuire thecotrolli' iterest o: private respo4et &a"abas

    Ce*et Co*pa"# 6c. =&CC@. As securit" :or sai4loa# the spouses Arro"o execute4 a real estate*ort'a'e over a parcel o: la4 a -ista propert". &CCthe :ile4 9ith petitioer ba a applicatio a4a'ree*et :or the establish*et o: a ei'ht =)@ "ear4e:erre4 letter o: cre4it =QC@ :or 7#$$$#$$$.$$ i :avor o:&o"o Mea ;aisha# t4. to cover the i*portatio o: ace*et plat *achier" a4 euip*et. po approvalo: sai4 applicatio a4 opei' o: a QC the Arro"ospouses execute4 a Suret" A'ree*et a4 Coveat tosecure the loa acco**o4atio. &he i*porte4 ce*etplat *achier" a4 euip*et arrive4 :ro* !apa a4

    9ere release4 to &CC u4er a trust receipt a'ree*et.&CC# :aile4 to re*it a4Qor pa" the correspo4i'a*out covere4 b" the 4ra9i's. &hus# P0 oti:ie4&CC o: its itetio to repossess# as it later 4i4# thei*porte4 *achier" a4 euip*et :or :ailure o: &CC tosettle its obli'atios u4er the QC. 6 the *eati*e# thepersoal accouts o: the spouses Arro"o# 9hich iclu4e4aother loa o: P1($#$$$.$$ secure4 b" a real estate*ort'a'e over parcels o: a'ricultural la4 o9 as8acie4a 0aco ha4 lie9ise beco*e 4ue. ailure o:Arro"o spouses to pa" the loa# P0 :ile4 a petitio :orextra

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    47/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    PCIBAN# "S% CA

    !ACTS*

    PC60 a4# Maila 0ai' Corporatio =M0C@9ere Doit bi44ers i a :oreclosure sale o: assorte4

    *ii' *achier" a4 euip*et previousl" *ort'a'e4to the* b" the Philippie 6ro Mies# 6c. =P6M@. our"ears later# Atlas a'ree4 to purchase so*e o: theseproperties o9e4 Doitl" b" PC60 a4 M0C# evi4ece4 b"a ee4 o: Sale 9ith the parties a'reei' therei to aiitial 4o9pa"*et o: P12#$$$#$$$.$$ a4 the balaceo: P1)#$$$#$$$.$$ pa"able i six *othl" istall*ets.&he cotract cotaie4 certai provisios expressl"

    9arrati' the properties :ree :ro* all lies a4ecu*braces a4 :reei' Atlas :ro* all clai*s a4ici4etal actios o: the uio AMAF. &he AMAFthe *a4e a clai* 9hich ste**e4 :ro* a labor 4ispute

    9herei AMAF obtaie4 a :avorable Du4'*eta'aist P6M i the a*out o: P%#2/)#3$7.77# 9hich Atlas

    pai4.

    Accor4i' to Atlas# apart :ro* the 4o9pa"*eta4 istall*et pa"*ets it shoul4 be cre4ite4 9ith itspa"*et o: P%#2/)#3$7.77 to AMAF. &hus# Atlasclai*s to have *a4e a overpa"*et a4 that PC60shoul4 rei*burse to it P233#()%.23. Fhe PC60 re:use4to pa"# Atlas sue4 PC60 to obtai rei*burse*et o: thealle'e4 overpa"*et. PC60 cote4e4 that Atlas stillo9e4 it a total o: P/$)#3/).75. 6t also alle'e4 that evebe:ore the 9rit o: 'arish*et 9as serve4 o Atlas# the

    Du4'*et i :avor o: AMAF 9as re4uce4 a4 ha4alrea4" bee partiall" satis:ie4. Atlas coul4 ot cre4it thea*out receive4 b" AMAF i satis:actio o: the Atlasobli'atio to PC60.

    ISSUE*

    Fhether or ot PC60 ca 4e*a4 :ro* Atlas*ore tha 9hat it receive4 :ro* M0C

    Fhether or ot Atlas ca 4e*a4rei*burse*et :ro* PC60 :or the pa"*et *a4e to

    AMAF

    HELD*

    =1@ o. &his case is 4ee*e4 as a Doitobli'atio# 9here there is a cocurrece o: severalcre4itors# or o: several 4ebtors or o: several 4ebtors or o:several cre4itors a4 4ebtors# b" virtue o: 9hich each o:the cre4itors has a ri'ht to 4e*a4# a4 each o: the4ebtors is bou4 to re4er# co*pliace 9ith his

    proportioate part o: the prestatio 9hich costitutes theobDect o: the obli'atio. Article 12$) o: the Civil Co4e*a4ates the eual shari' o: cre4itors i the pa"*eto: 4ebt i the absece o: a" la9 or stipulatio to thecotrar". &here 9as "et o a'ree*et as o: that 4atecoceri' the correspo4i' share o: each cre4itor. 6

    9as ol" o ) March 1/7/ 9he PC60 co**uicate4 toAtlas the perceta'e o: pa"*ets to be re*itte4 to PC60

    a4 M0C. 0e:ore sai4 4ate# Atlas coul4 be secure i thethou'ht that the *atter o: shari' 9as best le:t to thecre4itors to 4eci4e. &he a*out etitle to PC60 isthere:ore a iteral *atter bet9ee it a4 M0C.

    =2@ As :ou4 b" the Court the Du4'*et oAMAFs clai* 9as re4uce4 it toP3#(/7#$%7.77Clearl"# Atlas overpai4 AMAF. 6t i**e4iatel" pai4AMAF# 9ithout *ai' a" ivesti'atio ocosultatio 9ith PC60. Article 123( o: the Civil Co4eapplies i this istace that 9hoever pa"s :or aother*a" 4e*a4 :ro* the 4ebtor 9hat he has pai4# excepthat i: he pai4 9ithout the o9le4'e or a'aist the 9ill o:the 4ebtor# he ca recover ol" iso:ar as the pa"*ehas bee bee:icial to the 4ebtor. PC60 is the 4ebtor ithis case# 9hile Atlas is the thir4 perso 9ho pai4 theobli'atio o: the 4ebtor 9ithout the latters o9le4'ea4 coset. Atlas the *a" ol" recover :ro* PC60 thea*out o: pa"*et 9hich has bee:ite4 the latter. 6: the4ebt has bee pai4 such as i this case# a pa"*et b" athir4 perso 9oul4 costitute a pa"*et o: 9hat is o4ueL his re*e4" 9oul4 be a'aist the perso 9horeceive4 the pa"*et =AMAF@ a4 ot a'aist the4ebtor 9ho 4i4 ot bee:it :ro* the pa"*et.

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 45

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    48/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    CULABA "S% CA '() SAN IGUEL CORP%

    !ACTS*

    &he spouses Culaba 9ere the o9ers o: theCulaba store a4 9ere e'a'e4 i the sale a44istributio o: Sa Mi'uel Corp.s beer pro4ucts. SMC solbeer pro4ucts the Culaba spouses i the a*out o:P2)#(5$.$$ as evi4ece4 b" a &e*porar" Cre4it 6voice.Caluba spouses *a4e a partial pa"*et o: P3#7%$leavi' a upai4 balace o: P2%#/1$. As the" :aile4 topa" 4espite 4e*a4s# SMC :ile4 a actio :or collectioo: a su* o: *oe" a'aist the*. e:e4at ?spouses4eie4 a" liabilit"# clai*i' that the" ha4 alrea4" pai4the plaiti:: i :ull separate occasios. e:e4atspresete4 :our &e*porar" Char'e Sales iui4atio

    Receipts =&CS@. racisco Caluba testi:ie4 that he*a4e the pa"*ets to a SMC supervisor 9ho ca*e ia SMC va. 8e 9as the sho9e4 a list o: custo*ersaccoutabilities 9hich iclu4e4 his accout. SMC thesub*itte4 a publishers a::i4avit to prove that the etireboolet o: &CS Receipts beari' os. 273$1

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    49/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    TONE & CITY DE"ELOPENT CORPORATION "S%CA '() GUILLERO R% "OLUNTAD

    !ACTS*

    Respo4et +uiller*o -oluta4 =+uiller*o@ a4petitioer &o9e Cit" evelop*et Corporatio 9ere

    both e'a'e4 i the costructio busiess. &he" etere4ito a cotract :or the =a@ costructio o: several housi'uits belo'i' to or reserve4 :or 4i::eret i4ivi4ualsL=b@ repair o: several existi' housi' uits belo'i' to4i::eret i4ivi4ualsL a4 =c@ repair o: :acilities# all locate4at the -ir'iia -alle" Sub4ivisio# o9e4 a4 4evelope4b" the petitioer. &he total cotract cost a*oute4 toOe Millio ort" Oe &housa4 &hree 8u4re4 i:t"ie =P1#$%1#35/.$$@ Pesos.

    &he parties a'ree4 that +uiller*o shoul4 bepai4 i :ull b" petitioer the a'ree4 cotract cost upoco*pletio o: the proDect. Pe4i' co*pletio o: the

    proDect# +uiller*o 9as allo9e4 b" petitioer to occup"#:ree o: char'e# oe o: its houses at the -ir'iia -alle"Sub4ivisio.A:ter co*pleti' the costructio a4 repair 9orssubDect o: the cotract# +uiller*o 4e*a4e4 pa"*et :orhis services.

    Fhe petitioer :aile4 to satis:" his clai* i :ull#+uiller*o :ile4 o April 3$# 1//$ a Co*plait :orcollectio a'aist petitioer be:ore the R&C o: Mailaalle'i' that petitioer pai4 hi* ol" the a*out o:P(/#%$$.$$# leavi' a balace o: P/71#/5/.$$ u4er theter*s o: their cotract.

    6 its As9er 9ith Couter

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    50/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    NOEI % CORONEL "S% ENCARNACION C% CAPATIG% R% N,% 157836% ' 26$ 2005

    SM> Exti'uish*et o: Pa"*et

    !ACTS*

    Petitioer cotracte4 t9o loas :ro* respo4eto Septe*ber %# 1//2 a4 October 25# 1//2. &he :irsta*oute4 to P121#$$$.$$ pa"able o or be:oreebruar" %# 1//3 a4 the seco4 a*oute4 toP3(3#$$$.$$ pa"able o or be:ore March 25# 1//3. 6retur# petitioer issue4 respo4et t9o checs :or the:irst a4 seco4 loa. &he t9o loas are e*bo4ie4 it9o ha49ritte istru*ets.

    Petitioer :aile4 to pa" her loas upo *aturit"4espite repeate4 4e*a4s :ro* respo4et. &he t9ochecs she issue4 9ere 4ishoore4 9he presete4 :orpa"*et o ebruar" 1(# 1//3 a4 April 7# 1//3.

    8ece# o Septe*ber 1%# 1//3# respo4et :ile4 aco*plait :or su* o: *oe" a4 4a*a'es 9ithattach*et a'aist petitioer be:ore the Re'ioal &rialCourt o: +ua'ua# Pa*pa'a.

    Petitioer 4eie4 cotracti' the t9o loas i thea*outs o: P121#$$$.$$ a4 P3(3#$$$.$$ :ro*respo4et. She alle'e4 that the Metroba checsrepreseti' the :ore'oi' a*outs 9ere t9o o: severalchecs she issue4 i :avor o: respo4et :or a loaa*outi' to P1.1$1 *illio 9hich she has :ull" pai4.She clai*e4 that 4espite :ull pa"*et# respo4et still4eposite4 the t9o checs because o: a 4ispute bet9eethe* arisi' :ro* respo4ets 4e*a4 :or exorbitata4 a44itioal iterest o the P1.1$1 *illio loa.

    Petitioer alle'e4 :urther that there 9ereistaces 9he respo4et ase4 her to a::ix hersi'ature o bla sheets o: paperY thereb" i*pl"i' thatthe cotets o: Exhibits cotaii' the loa a'ree*ets

    9ere 9ritte b" respo4et o sheets o: paper si'e4 ia4vace b" petitioer.

    &he R&C rule4 i :avor o: respo4et or4eri'hi* to pa". &he CA a::ir*e4 such 4ecisio. 8ece# thispetitio.

    ISSUE*

    Fhether pa"*et 9as *a4e a4 that it 9as :ull"exti'uishe4.

    HELD*

    Petitioer tries to escape resposibilit" b"testi:"i' that it has bee respo4ets practice to as

    her to si' bla sheets o: paper. She 9ats the courto believe that she 4i4 ot o9 o: the cotets oExhibits A

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    51/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    NAGA TELEPHONE CO%$ INC% :NATELCO; ANDLUCIANO % AGGAY "S%

    CA AND CAARINES SUR II ELECTRICCOOPERATI"E$ INC% :CASURECO II;

    G%R% N,% 107112 !.' 24$ 1994

    !ACTS*

    Petitioer a'a &elephoe Co.# 6c. =A&ECO@is a telephoe co*pa" re4eri' local as 9ell as lo'4istace telephoe service i a'a Cit" 9hile privaterespo4et Ca*aries Sur 66 Electric Cooperative# 6c.=CASRECO 66@ is a private corporatio establishe4 :orthe purpose o: operati' a electric po9er service i thesa*e cit".

    O ove*ber 1# 1/77# the parties etere4 ito a

    cotract :or the use b" petitioers i the operatio o: itstelephoe service the electric li'ht posts o: privaterespo4et i a'a Cit". 6 cosi4eratio there:or#petitioers a'ree4 to istall# :ree o: char'e# te =1$@telephoe coectios :or the use b" private respo4et.&he sai4 cotract also provi4e4>

    &hat the ter* or perio4 o: this cotract shall beas lo' as the part" o: the :irst part has ee4 :or theelectric li'ht posts o: the part" o: the seco4 part it bei'u4erstoo4 that this cotract shall ter*iate 9he :ora" reaso 9hatsoever# the part" o: the seco4 part is:orce4 to stop# aba4oe4 sicT its operatio as a publicservice a4 it beco*es ecessar" to re*ove the electricli'htpostL

    A:ter the cotract ha4 bee e:orce4 :or over te=1$@ "ears# private respo4et :ile4 9ith R&C a'aistpetitioers :or re:or*atio o: the cotract 9ith 4a*a'es#o the 'rou4 that it is too oe

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    52/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    12(7 states i our la9 the 4octrie o: u:orsee evets.&his is sai4 to be base4 o the 4iscre4ite4 theor" o:rebus sic statibus i public iteratioal la9L u4er thistheor"# the parties stipulate i the li'ht o: certaiprevaili' co4itios# a4 oce these co4itios ceaseto exist the cotract also ceases to exist. Cosi4eri'practical ee4s a4 the 4e*a4s o: euit" a4 'oo4:aith# the 4isappearace o: the basis o: a cotract 'ives

    rise to a ri'ht to relie: i :avor o: the part" preDu4ice4.

    O the issue o: re:or*atio o: cotract#petitioers alle'e that respo4et courtKs ruli' that theri'ht o: actio Garose ol" a:ter sai4 cotract ha4 alrea4"beco*e 4isa4vata'eous a4 u:air to it 4ue tosubseuet evets a4 co4itios# 9hich *ust beso*eti*e 4uri' the latter part o: 1/)2 or i 1/)3 . . .G iserroeous. 6 re:or*atio o: cotracts# 9hat is re:or*e4is ot the cotract itsel:# but the istru*et e*bo4"i'the cotract. 6t :ollo9s that 9hether the cotract is4isa4vata'eous or ot is irrelevat to re:or*atio a4there:ore# caot be a ele*et i the 4eter*iatio o:

    the perio4 :or prescriptio o: the actio to re:or*.

    Article 11%% o: the e9 Civil Co4e provi4es#iter alia# that a actio upo a 9ritte cotract *ust bebrou'ht 9ithi te =1$@ "ears :ro* the ti*e the ri'ht o:actio accrues. Clearl"# the te =1$@ "ear perio4 is to berecoe4 :ro* the ti*e the ri'ht o: actio accrues 9hichis ot ecessaril" the 4ate o: executio o: the cotract.As correctl" rule4 b" respo4et court# privaterespo4etKs ri'ht o: actio arose Gso*eti*e 4uri' thelatter part o: 1/)2 or i 1/)3 9he accor4i' to Att".uis +eeral# !r. . . .# he 9as ase4 b" =privaterespo4etKs@ 0oar4 o: irectors to stu4" sai4 cotractas it alrea4" appeare4 4isa4vata'eous to =privaterespo4et@ =p. 31# ts# Ma" )# 1/)/@. =Privaterespo4etKs@ cause o: actio to as :or re:or*atio o:sai4 cotract shoul4 thus be cosi4ere4 to have ariseol" i 1/)2 or 1/)3# a4 :ro* 1/)2 to !auar" 2# 1/)/

    9he the co*plait i this case 9as :ile4# te =1$@ "earsha4 ot "et elapse4.G

    Re'ar4i' the last issue# petitioers alle'e thatthere is othi' purel" potestative about the prestatioso: either part" because petitioerKs per*issio :or :reeuse o: telephoes is ot *a4e to 4epe4 purel" o their

    9ill# either is private respo4etKs per*issio :or :reeuse o: its posts 4epe4et purel" o its 9ill.

    PetitioersK alle'atios *ust be uphel4 i this re'ar4. Apotestative co4itio is a co4itio# the :ul:ill*et o:

    9hich 4epe4s upo the sole 9ill o: the 4ebtor# i 9hichcase# the co4itioal obli'atio is voi4. 0ase4 o this4e:iitio# respo4et courtKs :i4i' that the provisio ithe cotract# to 9it>

    =a@ &hat the ter* or perio4 o: this cotractshall be as lo' as the part" o: the :irst part=petitioer@ has ee4 :or the electric li'ht posts o: thepart" o: the seco4 part =private respo4et@ . . ..

    is a potestative co4itio# is correct. 8o9ever# it *ushave overlooe4 the other co4itios i the sa*eprovisio# to 9it>

    . . . it bei' u4erstoo4 that this cotracshall ter*iate 9he :or a" reaso 9hatsoever# thepart" o: the seco4 part =private respo4et@ is :orce4to stop# aba4oe4 =sic@ its operatio as a publicservice a4 it beco*es ecessar" to re*ove the

    electric li'ht post L9hich are casual co4itios sice the" 4epe4 ochace# ha,ar4# or the 9ill o: a thir4 perso. 6 su*the cotract is subDect to *ixe4 co4itios# that isthe" 4epe4 partl" o the 9ill o: the 4ebtor a4 partl"o chace# ha,ar4 or the 9ill o: a thir4 perso# 9hich4o ot ivali4ate the a:ore*etioe4 provisio

    !ALLO*Petitio E6E. CA 4ecisio A6RME.

    TRANS-PACI!IC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES$ INC%"S% CA '() ASSOCIATED BAN#

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 2

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    53/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    G%R% N,% 109172 A..= 19$ 1994

    !ACTS*

    6 1/7/# petitioer applie4 :or a4 9as 'rate4several :iacial acco**o4atios a*outi' to P1.3 Mb" respo4et Associate4 0a. &he loas 9ere

    evi4ece4 a4 secure4 b" :our =%@ pro*issor" otes# areal estate *ort'a'e coveri' three parcels o: la4 a4a chattel *ort'a'e over petitioerKs stoc a4ivetories.able to settle its obli'atio i :ull# petitioer reueste4:or# a4 9as 'rate4 b" respo4et ba# a restructuri'o: the re*aii' i4ebte4ess 9hich the a*oute4 toP1#$57#5$$.$$# as all the previous pa"*ets *a4e 9ereapplie4 to pealties a4 iterests.

    &o secure the re

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    54/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    !ACTS*

    O various 4ates i October# ove*ber a4ece*ber# 1/75# +re'orio 4e eo 4oi' busiessu4er the a*e a4 st"le o: Mar 64ustrial Sales sol4a4 4elivere4 to Silahis Mareti' Corporatio variousite*s o: *ercha4ise covere4 b" several ivoices i the

    a''re'ate a*out o: P22#213.75 pa"able 9ithi thirt"=3$@ 4a"s :ro* 4ate o: the coveri' ivoices.

    Alle'e4l" 4ue to SilahisK :ailure to pa" its accoutupo *aturit" 4espite repeate4 4e*a4s# 4e eo :ile4a co*plait :or the collectio o: the sai4 accoutsiclu4i' accrue4 iterest thereo i the a*out o:P((1.$3 a4 attore"Ks :ees o: P5#$$$.$$ plus costs o:liti'atio.

    &he as9er a4*itte4 the alle'atios o: theco*plait iso:ar as the ivoices 9ere cocere4 butpresete4 as a::ir*ative 4e:esesL aT a 4ebit *e*o :or

    P22#2$$.$$ as ureali,e4 pro:it :or a suppose4co**issio that Silahis shoul4 have receive4 :ro* 4eeo :or the sale o: sprocets i the a*out o:P111#$$$.$$ *a4e 4irectl" to ole Philippies#6corporate4 b" the latter so*eti*e i Au'ust 1/75L a4bT SilahisK clai* that it is etitle4 to retur the stailesssteel scree 9hich 9as :ou4 4e:ective b" its cliet#0or4e 6teratioal# avao Cit"# a4 to have thecorrespo4i' a*out cacelle4 :ro* its accout 9ith4e eo.

    ISSUE*

    Fhether or ot private respo4et is liable to thepetitioer :or the co**issio or *ar'i :or the 4irectsale 9hich the :or*er coclu4e4 a4 cosu**ate4 9ithole Philippies# 6corporate4 9ithout coursi' thesa*e throu'h herei petitioer.

    HELD*

    6t *ust be re*e*bere4 that co*pesatio taesplace 9he t9o persos# i their o9 ri'ht# are cre4itorsa4 4ebtors to each other. Article 127/ o: the Civil Co4eprovi4es that> G6 or4er that co*pesatio *a" be

    proper# it is ecessar"> 1T that each oe o: the obli'orsbe bou4 pricipall"# a4 that he be at the sa*e ti*e apricipal cre4itor o: the otherL 2T that both 4ebts cosisti a su* o: *oe"# or i: the thi's 4ue are cosu*able#the" be o: the sa*e i4# a4 also o: the sa*e ualit" i:the latter has bee state4L 3T that the t9o 4ebts be 4ueL%T that the" be liui4ate4 a4 4e*a4ableL 5T that overeither o: the* there be a" retetio or cotrovers"#co**ece4 b" thir4 persos a4 co**uicate4 i 4ueti*e to the 4ebtor.G

    4oubte4l"# petitioer a4*its the vali4it" o: itsoutsta4i' accouts 9ith private respo4et i thea*out o: P22#213.75 as cotaie4 i its as9er. 0ut

    9hether private respo4et is liable to pa" the petitioea 2$J *ar'i or co**issio o the subDect sale to olePhilippies# 6c. is vi'orousl" 4ispute4. &hiscircu*stace prevets le'al co*pesatio :ro* tai'place.

    &he Court a'rees 9ith respo4et appellatecourt that there is o evi4ece o recor4 :ro* 9hich ica be i:erre4 that there 9as a" a'ree*et bet9eethe petitioer a4 private respo4et prohibiti' thelatter :ro* selli' 4irectl" to ole Philippies6corporate4. e:iitel"# it caot be asserte4 that the4ebit *e*o 9as a cotract bi4i' bet9ee the partiescosi4eri' that the sa*e# as correctl" :ou4 b" theappellate court# 9as ot si'e4 b" private respo4etor 9as there a" *etio therei o: a" co**it*et b"the latter to pa" a" co**issio to the :or*er ivolvi'the sale o: sprocets to ole Philippies# 6c. i the

    a*out o: P111#$$$.$$.

    64ee4# such 4ocu*et ca be tae as sel:

    1. &here *ust be a previous vali4 obli'atio#2. &here *ust be a a'ree*et o: the parties cocere4to a e9 cotract#3. &here *ust be the exti'uish*et o: the ol4 cotract

    a4%. &here *ust be the vali4it" o: the e9 cotract.

    &he ele*ets o: ovatio are patetl" laci' ithe istat case. MaNalac te4ere4 a chec :oP1#2$$#$$$.$$ to PS0a :or the release o: % parcels ola4 covere4 b" &C& os.

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    62/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    ol4 oe. po the other ha4# o speci:ic :or* isreuire4 :or a i*plie4 ovatio# a4 all that isprescribe4 b" la9 9oul4 be a ico*patibilit" bet9eethe t9o cotracts. Fhile there is reall" o har4 a4 :astrule to 4eter*ie 9hat *i'ht costitute to be a su::icietcha'e that ca bri' about ovatio# the touchstoe :orcotrariet"# ho9ever# 9oul4 be a irrecocilableico*patibilit" bet9ee the ol4 a4 the e9 obli'atios.

    either ca MaNalac be 4ee*e4 substitute4ebtor 9ithi the cote*platio o: Article 12/3 o: theCivil Co4e# 9hich states that>

    Art. 12/3. ovatio 9hich cosists isubstituti' a e9 4ebtor i the place o: the ori'ial oe#*a" be *a4e 9ithout the o9le4'e or a'aist the 9illo: the latter# but ot 9ithout the coset o: the cre4itor.Pa"*et b" the e9 4ebtor 'ives hi* the ri'hts*etioe4 i articles 123( a4 1237.

    6 or4er to cha'e the perso o: the 4ebtor# theol4 oe *ust be expressl" release4 :ro* the obli'atio#

    a4 the thir4 perso or e9 4ebtor *ust assu*e the:or*ers place i the relatio. ovatio is everpresu*e4. Coseuetl"# that 9hich arises :ro* apurporte4 cha'e i the perso o: the 4ebtor *ust beclear a4 express. 6t is thus icu*bet o MaNalac tosho9 clearl" a4 ueuivocall" that ovatio has i4ee4tae place. 6 a+dalena -states Inc. v. 'odri+"e#9ehel4 that Gthe *ere :act that the cre4itor receives a'uarat" or accepts pa"*ets :ro* a thir4 perso 9hohas a'ree4 to assu*e the obli'atio# 9he there is oa'ree*et that the :irst 4ebtor shall be release4 :ro*resposibilit"# 4oes ot costitute a ovatio# a4 thecre4itor ca still e:orce the obli'atio a'aist the

    ori'ial 4ebtor.G

    MaNalac has ot sho9 b" co*petet evi4ecethat the" 9ere expressl" tai' the place o: +alicia as4ebtor# or that the latter 9ere bei' release4 :ro* theirsoli4ar" obli'atio. or 9as it sho9 that the obli'atioo: the +alicias 9as bei' exti'uishe4 a4 replace4 b"a e9 oe. &he existece o: ovatio *ust be sho9 iclear a4 u*istaable ter*s.

    +rati' ar+"endo that a e9 obli'atio 9asestablishe4 9ith the acceptace b" the ba o: the PC60Chec a4 its applicatio to the loa accout o: MaNalaco the co4itio that &C& o. %17$12 9oul4 berelease4# this e9 obli'atio ho9ever coul4 ot supplatthe October 13# 1/77 real estate *ort'a'e execute4 b"MaNalac# 9hich# b" all itets a4 purposes# is o9 a4e:uct a4 o

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    63/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    also si'e4 a Cotiui' Suret"ship A'ree*et i:avour o: Phil&rust 0a# as Presi4et o: Astro a4 assuret".

    &herea:ter# Phil'uaratee 9ith the coset o:Astro 'uaratee4 i :avour o: Phil&rust the pa"*et o:7$J o: Astros loa# subDect to the co4itio that upopa"*et# it shall be proportioall" subro'ate4 to the

    ri'hts o: Phil&rust a'aist Astro.

    As a result o: Astros :ailure to pa" 4espite4e*a4s# Phil +uaratee :ile4 a'aist Astro a4 Roxasa co*plait :or su* o: *oe" i the Maati R&C. R&Cre4ere4 Du4'*et 'iats petitioer 9hich 9as a::ir*e4b" the CA.

    ISSUE*

    Fhether or ot Roxas shoul4 be hel4 soli4aril"liable 9ith Astro :or the su* o: *oe"

    HELD*

    BES. &he istat case is oe o: the le'alsubro'atio that occurs b" operatio o: la9# a4 9ithoutee4 o: the 4ebtors o9le4'e. urther# Phil'uaratee#as 'uarator# beca*e the tras:eree o: all the ri'hts o:Philtrust as a'aist Roxas a4 Astro because the'uarator 9ho pa"s is subro'ate4 b" virtue thereo: toall the ri'hts 9hich the cre4itor ha4 a'aist the 4ebtor.I

    Subro'atio is the tras:er o: all ri'hts o: thecre4itor to a thir4 perso# 9ho substitutes hi* i all hisri'hts. 6t *a" either be le'al or covetioal. e'alsubro'atio is that 9hich taes 9ithout a'ree*et but b"operatio o: la9 because o: certai acts. 6staces o:le'al subro'atio are those provi4e4 i Art. 13$2 o: theCivil Co4e. Covetioal subro'atio# o the other ha4#is that 9hich taes place b" a'ree*et o: the parties.

    6 the istat case# Astros loa 9ith Philtrust0a is secure4 b" three pro*issor" otes. &hesepro*issor" otes are vali4 a4 bi4i' a'aist Astro a4Roxas. As it appears o the otes# Roxas si'e4 t9ice>:irst# as presi4et o: Astro a4 seco4# i his persoalcapacit". 6 si'i' his a*e asi4e :ro* bei' the

    Presi4et o: Asro# Roxas beca*e a co

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    64/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    aouce4 i a *eeti' 9ith the e*plo"ees that it 9oul4cease operatios o Au'ust 13# 1/)7# 4ue to serious:iacial losses. Operatios 4i4 cease as aouce4.O Au'ust 17# 1/)7# the uio :ile4 a co*plait 9ith theepart*et o: abor a'aist the petitioers :or ille'allocout# u:air labor practice a4 4a*a'es# :ollo9e4 theext 4a" 9ith aother co*plait :or pa"*et o: upai4

    9a'es# e*er'ec" cost o: livi' allo9aces# holi4a"

    pa"# a4 other bee:its.

    O ove*ber 2/# 1/))# the abor Arbiter4eclare4 the shut4o9 ille'al a4 violative o: thee*plo"eesK ri'ht to sel:

    AR&. (. Ri'hts *a" be 9aive4# uless the 9aiver iscotrar" to la9# public or4er# public polic"# *orals# or'oo4 custo*s# or preDu4icial to a thir4 perso 9ith a ri'htreco'i,e4 b" la9.

    AR&. 13$(. &he cotracti' parties *a" establish suchstipulatios# clauses# ter*s a4 co4itios as the" *a"

    4ee* coveiet# provi4e4 the" are ot cotrar" to la9*orals# 'oo4 custo*s# public or4er# or public polic".

    &he subor4iate positio o: the i4ivi4uae*plo"ee vis/a/vis*aa'e*et re4ers hi* especiall"vulerable to its bla4ish*ets a4 i*portui's# a4eve iti*i4atios# that *a" result i his i*provi4etl" ireluctatl" si'i' over bee:its to 9hich he is clearl"

    etitle4. Reco'i,i' this 4a'er# 9e have cosistetl"hel4 that uitclai*s o: the 9orersK bee:its 9i oestop the* :ro* asserti' the* Dust the sa*e o the'rou4 that public polic" prohibits such 9aivers.

    &hat the e*plo"ee has si'e4 a satis:actioreceipt 4oes ot result i a 9aiverL the la9 4oes ocosi4er as vali4 a" a'ree*et to receive lessco*pesatio tha 9hat a 9orer is etitle4 to recoverA 4ee4 o: release or uitclai* caot bar a e*plo"ee:ro* 4e*a4i' bee:its to 9hich he is le'all" etitle4.

    Release a4 uitclai* is ieuitable a4

    ico'ruous to the 4eclare4 public polic" o: the State toa::or4 protectio to labor a4 to assure the ri'hts o9orers to securit" o: teure.

    All tol4# the co4uct o: the petitioers to9ar4 thee*plo"ees has bee less tha co**e4able. 64ee4# iis reprehesible. irst# the co*pa" ivei'le4 the* to

    9aive their clai*s to co*pesatio 4ue the* o thepro*ise that :uture bee:its 9oul4 be pai4 =a4 to *ae*atters 9orse# there is o sho9i' that the" 9erei4ee4 pai4@. Seco4# it re:use4 to reco'i,e therespo4et uio# su''esti' to the e*plo"ees that the"

    Doi aother uio acceptable to *aa'e*et. &hir4# ithreatee4 the e*plo"ees 9ith the closure o: theco*pa" a4 the actuall" 4i4 so 9he the e*plo"eesisiste4 o their 4e*a4s. All these acts re:lect o thebona fideso: the petitioers a4 u*istaabl" i4icatetheir ill 9ill to9ar4 the e*plo"ees.

    ACOL "S% PHILIPPINE COERCIAL CREDIT CARD

    INCORPORATED./ 25$ 2006

    !ACTS*

    O Au'ust 2$# 1/)2# petitioer Mauel Acoapplie4 9ith respo4et :or a 0aar4 cre4it car4 a4extesio. 0oth 9ere issue4 to hi* shortl" therea:teror several "ears# he re'ularl" use4 this car4purchasi' :ro* respo4etKs accre4ite4 establish*etsa4 pa"i' the correspo4i' char'es :or such

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 4

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    65/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    purchases. Petitioer 4iscovere4 the loss o: his cre4itcar4. A:ter exhausti' all e::orts to :i4 it# o April 1/#1/)7# a Su4a"# he calle4 up respo4etKs o::ice a4reporte4 the loss. &he represetative he spoe to tol4hi* that his car4 9oul4 be i**e4iatel" iclu4e4 i thecircular o: lost car4s.

    A'ai# o April 2$# 1/)7# petitioer calle4 up

    respo4et to reiterate his report o the loss o: his car4.8e iuire4 i: there 9ere other reuire*ets he ee4e4to co*pl" 9ith i coectio 9ith the loss. Respo4etKsrepresetative a4vise4 hi* to put ito 9riti' the oticeo: loss a4 to sub*it it# to'ether 9ith the extesio car4so: his 9i:e a4 4au'hter. Petitioer pro*ptl" 9rote aletter 4ate4 April 2$# 1/)7 co:ir*i' the loss a4 set itto respo4et 9hich receive4 it o April 22# 1/)7.

    O April 21# 1/)7# a 4a" be:ore receivi' the9ritte otice# respo4et issue4 a special cacellatiobulleti i:or*i' its accre4ite4 establish*ets o: theloss o: the car4s o: the eu*erate4 hol4ers# iclu4i'

    petitioerKs. :ortuatel"# it ture4 out that so*ebo4"use4 petitioerKs car4 o April 1/ a4 2$# 1/)7 to bu"co**o4ities 9orth P7(#$(7.2). &he accre4ite4establish*ets reporte4 the ivoices :or such purchasesto respo4et 9hich the bille4 petitioer :or thata*out.

    oetheless# respo4et isiste4 o colleti'a4 alle'e4 that it 9as the *ost practicable proce4ure o:the co*pa". 6t cite4 provisio o. 1 o: the G&er*s a4Co4itios +overi' &he 6ssuace a4 se o: the0aar4G :ou4 at the bac o: the applicatio :or*>xxx 8ol4erKs resposibilit" :or all char'es *a4e throu'h the use o: thecar4 shall cotiue util the expiratio or its retur to the Car4 6ssuer or

    util a reasoable ti*e a:ter receipt b" the Car4 6ssuer o:9ritteotice o: loss o: the Car4 a4 its actual iclusio i the Cacellatio0ulleti. xxx

    R&C rule4 i :avour o: petitioer but 9asreverse4 b" CA. 8ece this istat petitio be:ore theSC.

    ISSUE*Fhether or ot Provisio o. 1 is vali4 a4

    bi4i' o the petitioer 'ive that the cotract 9as oeo: a4hesio

    HELD*

    O. &he :acts o: this case are virtuall" i4etical9ith those o: -rmita0o v. C(. 6 that case# petitioer

    &he Co*pa" a4 the Supervisor *utuall" a'ree>

    (@ Either part" *a" ter*iate this a'ree*et at 9ill# 9ithor 9ithout cause# at a" ti*e upo otice to the other.

    6 the case at bar# the ter*iatio clause o: theSupervisors A'ree*et clearl" provi4es :or t9o 9a"s oter*iati' a4Qor caceli' the cotract. Oe *o4e4oes ot exclu4e the other. &he cotract provi4e4 that ica be ter*iate4 or cacelle4 :or cause# it also state4that it ca be ter*iate4 9ithout cause# both at a" ti*e

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 6

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    69/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    a4 a:ter 9ritte otice. &hus# 9hether or ot theter*iatio or cacellatio o: the SupervisorsA'ree*et 9as :or cause#I is i**aterial. &he ol"reuire*et is that o: otice to the other part". Fhepetitioer Avo chose to ter*iate the cotract# :orcause# respo4et ua 9as 4ul" oti:ie4 thereo:.

    Forth stressi' is that the ri'ht to uilaterall" ter*iate

    or cacel the Supervisors A'ree*et 9ith or 9ithoutcause is euall" available to respo4et ua# subDect tothe sa*e otice reuire*et. Obviousl"# o a4vata'eis tae a'aist each other b" the cotracti' parties.

    PILIPINO TELEPHONE CORPORATION "S% TECSON' 7$ 2004

    !ACTS*

    Mr. &ecso applie4 :or six cellular phoesubscriptios 9ith Pilipio &elephoe Corporatio

    =P6&E@. &he applicatios 9ere approve4 a4 covere4b" six *obilie service a'ree*ets# all o: 9hichprovi4es> -eue o: all suits arisi' :ro* this A'ree*eor a" other suit 4irectl" or i4irectl" arisi' :ro* therelatioship bet9ee P6&E a4 subscriber shall be ithe proper courts o: Maati# Metro Maila. Subscribehereb" expressl" 9aives a" other veues.I

    Mr. &ecso :ile4 9ith the R&C# 6li'a Cit"# aaoel orte# a co*plait a'aist petitioer :or a Su* o:

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 7

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    70/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    Moe" a4 a*a'es.I P6&E *ove4 :or the 4is*issalo: the co*plait o the 'rou4 o: i*proper veue.

    ISSUE*

    Fhether or ot the co*plait 9as :ile4 i the9ro' veue

    HELD*

    Sectio %# Rule %# o: the Revise4 Rules o: CivilProce4ure allo9s the parties to a'ree a4 stipulate i

    9riti'# be:ore the :ili' o: a actio# o the exclusiveveue o: a" liti'atio bet9ee the*. Such aa'ree*et 9oul4 be vali4 a4 bi4i' provi4e4 that thestipulatio o the chose veue is exclusive i ature ori itet# that it is expresse4 i 9riti' b" the partiesthereto# a4 that it is etere4 ito be:ore the :ili' o: thesuit.

    &he provisio cotaie4 i para'raph 22 o: theMobile Service A'ree*et#I a sta4ar4 cotract *a4eout b" petitioer P6&E to its subscribers# apparetl"accepte4 a4 si'e4 b" respo4et# states that theveue o: all suits arisi' :ro* the a'ree*et# or a"other suit 4irectl" or i4irectl" arisi' :ro* therelatioship bet9ee P6&E a4 subscriber# shall be ithe proper courts o: Maati# Metro Maila.I &he a44e4stipulatio that the subscriber expressl" 9aives a"other veueI shoul4 i4icate# clearl" eou'h# the iteto: the parties to cosi4er the veue stipulatio as bei'preclusive i character.

    PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BAN# "S% CAA =1@ 32J!ul" 1/)%TL =2@ %1J Octobe1/)%TL a4 =3@ %)J ove*ber 1/)%T# or 3 ti*es 9ithithe spa o: a si'le"ear.

    ARAFAG HABANA JALAYAJAY Page 50

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    71/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    &his 9as 4oe 4espite the u*erous letters o:reuest *a4e b" PR that the iterest rate beicrease4ol" to 21J or 2%J.PR :ile4 a co*plait a'aistPetitioer 9ith the R&C. &he latter 4is*isse4 the case:or lac o: *erit. Appeal b" PR to CA resulte4 i his:avor. 8ece the petitio :or certiorari u4er Rule %5 o:ROC :ile4 b"P0 9ith SC.

    ISSUE*

    espite the re*oval o: the sur" a9 ceili' oiterest# *a" the ba vali4l" icrease the stipulate4iterest rate o loas cotracte4 9ith thir4 persos aso:te as ecessar" a4 a'aist the protest o: suchpersos

    HELD*

    O. Althou'h u4er Sec. 2 o: P 11(# the

    Moetar" 0oar4 is authori,e4 to prescribe the *axi*u*rate o: iterest :or loas a4 to cha'e such rates9heever 9arrate4 b" prevaili' ecoo*ic a4 socialco4itios# b" express provisio# it *a" ot 4o soo:teer tha oce ever" 12 *othsI. 6: the Moetar"0oar4 caot# *uch less ca P0# e::ect icreases othe iterest rates *ore tha oce a "ear. 0ase4 o thecre4it a'ree*et a4 pro*issor" otes execute4bet9ee the parties# althou'h PR 4i4 a'ree to icreaseo the iterest rates allo9e4 b" la9# o la9 9as passe4

    9arrati' Petitioer to e::ect icrease o the iterestrates o the existi' loa o: PR :or the *oths o: !ul" toove*ber o: 1/)%.either there bei' a" 4ocu*etexecute4 a4 4elivere4 b" PR to e::ect such icrease.

    or escalatio clauses to be vali4 a4 9arratthe icrease o: the iterest rates o loas# there *ustbe>=1@ icrease 9as *a4e b" la9 or b" the Moetar"0oar4L =2@ stipulatio *ust iclu4e a clause :or there4uctio o: the stipulate4 iterest rate i the evet thatthe *axi*u* iterest is lo9ere4 b" la9 or b" theMoetar" boar4.

    6 this case# P0 *erel" relie4 o its o9 0oar4Resolutios# 9hich are ot la9s or resolutios o: theMoetar" 0oar4. espite the suspesio o: the sur"a9# i*posi' a ceili' o iterest rates# this 4oes ot

    authori,e bas to uilaterall" a4 successivel" icreaseiterest rates i violatio o: Sec. 2 P 11(.6creasesuilaterall" e::ecte4 b" P0 9as i violatio o: theMutualit" o: Cotracts u4er Art. 13$). &his provi4esthat the vali4it" a4 co*pliace o: the parties to thecotract caot be le:t to the 9ill o: oe o: thecotracti' parties. 6creases *a4e are there:ore voi4.6crease o the stipulate4 iterest rates *a4e b" P0also cotravees Art. 1/5(. 6t provi4es that# o iterestshall be 4ue uless it has bee expressl" stipulate4 i

    9riti'I. PR ever a'ree4 i 9riti' to pa" iterest

    i*pose4 b" P0 i excess o: 2%J per au*. 6terestrate i*pose4 b" P0# as correctl" :ou4 b" CA# isi4ubitabl" excessive.

    D#C HOLDINGS CORPORATION "S% CAA

  • 8/12/2019 Civil Law Review Digests Assoc

    72/230

    Civil Law Review 2 2013 - 2014

    "ear perio4# petitioer shall serve :or*al 9ritte oticeupo the lessor Ecaracio 0artolo*e o: its 4esire toexercise its optio. &he cotract also provi4e4 that icase petitioer chose to lease the propert"# it *a" taeactual possessio o: the pre*ises. 6 such a evet# thelease shall be :or a perio4 o: six "ears# ree9able :oraother six "ears# a4 the *othl" retal :ee shall beP15#$$$.$$ :or the :irst six "ears a4 P1)#$$$.$$ :or the

    ext six "ears# i case o: ree9al.

    Petitioer re'ularl" pai4 the *othl" retalprovi4e4 :or b" the Cotract to Ecaracio util her4eath i !auar" 1//$. &her